![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Characterization of a Small Plaque Variant of West Nile Virus Isolated in New York in 2000 1The Arbovirus Laboratories, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Slingerlands, New York 12159 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12201 Corresponding Author: Laura D. Kramer, Arbovirus Laboratories, 5668 State Farm Road, Slingerlands, NY 12159, Email: kramer/at/wadsworth.org Abstract A small-plaque variant (SP) of West Nile virus (WNV) was isolated in Vero cell culture from kidney tissue of an American crow collected in New York in 2000. The in vitro growth of the SP and parental (WT) strains was characterized in mammalian (Vero), avian (DF-1 and PDE) and mosquito (C6/36) cells. The SP variant replicated less efficiently than did the WT in Vero cells. In avian cells, SP growth was severely restricted at high temperatures, suggesting that the variant is temperature sensitive. In mosquito cells, growth of SP and WT was similar, but in vivo in Culex pipiens (L.) there were substantial differences. Relative to WT, SP exhibited reduced replication following intrathoracic inoculation and lower infection, dissemination and transmission rates following oral infection. Analysis of the full length sequence of the SP variant identified sequence differences which led to only two amino acid substitutions relative to WT, prM P54S and NS2A V61A. Keywords: West Nile virus, small plaque variant, wildtype, temperature sensitivity, Culex pipiens, vector competence Introduction West Nile virus (WNV) is an arthropod-borne virus belonging to the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus that exists primarily in a mosquito-avian transmission cycle. WNV, which had been geographically limited to Africa, the Middle East, India, Australasia, and western and central Asia, was first introduced into the northeastern United States in 1999 (Lanciotti et al., 1999) and has since spread throughout the United States, into Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, Latin America, and South America (Austin et al., 2004; Blitvich et al., 2003; Dupuis et al., 2005; Tachiiri et al., 2006). The single-stranded, positive-sense WNV genomic RNA is approximately 11 kb and encodes a single long polyprotein that is post-translationally processed by viral and host cellular proteases into three structural proteins and seven nonstructural proteins (Brinton, 2002). Comparisons of sequence data for full and partial genomes of WNV over the course of the virus spread throughout the U.S. demonstrate that there has been minimal genetic change since its introduction in 1999 (Davis et al., 2004). Although WNV has remained relatively genetically homogeneous in the U.S., a new WNV genotype emerged late in the 2001 transmission season and has gradually established itself as the dominant genotype of WNV in the U.S. (Davis et al., 2005; Ebel et al., 2004). Concurrent with the emergence of this new genotype was the rapid spread of WNV across the U.S. leading to the largest recorded epidemic of arboviral encephalitis in the western hemisphere (CDC 2002). Several studies have confirmed the presence of distinct WNV genetic variants existing at temporal and geographical foci (Beasley et al., 2003; Davis et al., 2004, 2005); for example, small plaque isolates of WNV that exhibited attenuated properties in vitro and in vivo were collected in Texas in 2003 (Davis et al., 2004). Small-plaque variants of other flaviviruses have been isolated in the laboratory. An isolate of dengue virus type 2 exhibited a mixed plaque phenotype in LLC-MK cells, and a small plaque subline selected from the mixed population in primary green monkey kidney cells was temperature sensitive (ts) in LLC-MK cells and attenuated in suckling mice (Eckels et al., 1976). A small plaque antigenic variant of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) was selected in Vero cell culture in the presence of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody, E3.3; this variant exhibited resistance to MAb3.3, but showed neurovirulence and neuroinvasiveness similar to the parental strain (Wu et al., 1997). Chemically mutated JEV, tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), and dengue virus type 4 (DENV-4) have all manifested small plaque phenotypes, ts, and attenuated pathogenicity in mice (Blaney et al., 2001, 2002, 2003; Eastman & Blair, 1985; Hanley et al., 2002; Rumyantsev et al., 2006). Neuroblastoma cell-adapted yellow fever 17D virus exhibited a small plaque morphology, as well as defective cell penetration, poor cell-to-cell spread and reduced growth efficiency, attributed to amino acid substitutions at positions 360 and 362 in the envelope protein (Chambers & Nickells, 2001; Nickells & Chambers, 2003; Vlaycheva & Chambers, 2002; Vlaycheva et al., 2004, 2005). An Ala to Pro single amino acid substitution in NS2A30 of WNVKUN strain resulted in abortive viral replication with low titer, absence of detectable plaques, and high level INFα/β production in A549 (human alveolar basal epithelial) cells; however, in BHK cells, the strain’s plaque size and replication efficiency were comparable to those of the wild type (Liu et al., 2006). Here we report a small-plaque (SP) variant selected from the mutant spectrum of WNV isolated from an American crow collected in New York in 2000. This variant was characterized in vitro in mammalian, avian, and mosquito cell lines, and in vivo in Culex pipiens (L.) mosquitoes. We demonstrate that this SP variant is attenuated both in vitro and in vivo. Results Isolation and characterization of the small-plaque variant The plaque morphology of the SP variant of WNV, isolated as described in Material and Methods, was compared to the parental wild type strain (WT). In Vero cells, at 72 hours post infection (hpi), WT exhibited a mixed-plaque phenotype, producing both large and small plaques while the SP virus had uniformly small plaques (Fig 1A
In vitro growth kinetics Growth of WT virus and the SP variant was compared in mammalian (Vero), avian (DF-1 and PDE) and mosquito (C6/36) cell lines. In Vero and DF-1 cells, at temperatures at or below 37°C, the SP variant grew to significantly lower titers than did the WT (P<0.01, t-test; Fig 2
The small-plaque phenotype was retained following growth of the SP variant in all cell types at 30°C, 34°C and 37°C. However, in Vero and DF-1 cells at or above 41°C, reversion to a mixed plaque phenotype was observed, with the proportion of plaques larger than 1.0 mm in diameter increasing with increasing temperature (data not shown). In PDE cells, growth of SP at temperatures up to 41°C did not result in a reversion to mixed plaque phenotype, and at 42.5°C no virus was recovered, indicating that SP failed to grow at this latter temperature. In contrast to the results with mammalian and avian cells, SP exhibited replication efficiency similar to that of WT in C6/36 cells, with nearly equal virus titers at all incubation temperatures (Fig 3A
In vivo growth kinetics in Cx. pipiens The ID50 values of WT and SP WNV following intrathoracic (IT) inoculation of Cx. pipiens were not significantly different: 0.5 pfu /mosquito and 2.1 pfu/mosquito, respectively. Growth analyses were performed by inoculation of mosquitoes with ten times the ID50 of each virus to ensure that all mosquitoes became infected. SP grew more slowly than WT in mosquitoes at 15°C, 27°C and 32°C (Fig 3B SP began to exhibit a mixed plaque phenotype in some individual mosquitoes after 2, 5, and 28 dpi at 32°C, 27°C, and 15°C, respectively, but the proportion of mosquitoes in which the phenotype reverted to WT, did not vary significantly among the temperatures examined (Table 1). At each time point, mosquitoes infected with SP that exhibited mixed plaque phenotype usually had higher virus titers than mosquitoes whose SP infection retained the small-plaque phenotype (data not shown).
Vector competence of Cx. pipiens The vector competence of SP in Cx. pipiens was compared to that of WT. At both day 7 and day 14 following peroral infection, the percentage of mosquitoes infected by feeding on SP was significantly lower than for WT (P<0.01), and there was no significant increase in the rate of infection from day 7 to day 14 post-feeding (PF)(Table 2). Dissemination and transmission rates of SP-infected mosquitoes were similar to the rates for WT at day 7, but they were significantly lower than the rates for WT at day 14, resulting in a greater proportion of WT-infected mosquitoes with disseminated virus (71% vs. 12%; p<0.01) and transmitting virus (51% vs. 9%; p<0.01) than those infected with SP. The higher infection, dissemination, and transmission rates for WT were reflected in the titers of virus recovered from bodies of infected mosquitoes (Fig 4
Comparison of WT and SP sequences The complete genome of the SP variant was sequenced and compared to the consensus sequence of the parental WT in order to identify mutations that could be responsible for the observed phenotypic differences. Four nucleotide differences between SP and WT were detected. Two (C1599U and C9660U) of these nucleotide changes were translationally silent, while two (C625U and U3707C) resulted in amino acid changes: a proline to serine change at position 54 (P54S) in the pr region of prM and a valine to alanine change at position 61 (V61A) in the NS2A protein (Table 3).
We also analyzed the prM and NS2A sequences of 70 individual plaques of mosquito- and cell culture-derived SP viruses that exhibited phenotypic reversion. From the mosquito-derived viruses, we picked 30 large plaques and 30 small plaques; however, from the cell culture-derived viruses only large plaques were selected as there were no small plaques available for analysis after incubation at 42.5°C). All large plaques from mosquitoes held at 27°C and 32°C, as well as the large plaques from the cell culture-derived viruses, had reverted from the SP sequence to the WT sequence at prM 625 (Table 4); however, half of the small plaques from these mosquitoes also contained the WT sequence at prM 625. Both large and small plaques from one mosquito held at 15°C had reverted to the WT sequence at prM 625. Three large and two small plaques from a second mosquito held at 15°C had reverted to the WT sequence at NS2A 3707 (Table 4), while one large plaque had reverted at both positions. Four plaques from this mosquito, including one large plaque, contained the SP sequence at both prM 625 and NS2A 3707.
Discussion Flaviviruses frequently demonstrate mixed-plaque morphology in cell culture (Butrapet et al., 2000; Davis et al., 2004). Experimentally mutagenized flaviviruses have been found to yield small plaque variants that are ts in cell culture (Eckels et al., 1976) and attenuated in mice (Blaney et al., 2001, 2002, 2003; Hanley et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2006). In this study, SP, a small-plaque viral variant, was selected from the mixed-plaque population of WNV isolated from an American crow collected in NY in 2000. Its replication efficiency in Vero cells was significantly lower than that of WT, and this difference was retained across a wide temperature range. In avian cell lines, SP growth was equal to or slower than WT growth at low temperatures, but at temperatures above 39°C, SP exhibited temperature sensitivity. Both viruses grew equally well in the mosquito cell line, C6/36. Thus, it was surprising to observe that both IT and peroral infection of Cx. pipiens mosquitoes resulted in significantly lower virus titers and infection rates for SP than for WT. Interestingly, although other small-plaque WNV strains have demonstrated a ts phenotype in Vero cell culture (Davis et al., 2004; Wicker et al., 2006), the SP variant characterized here did not. WNV is maintained in a transmission cycle primarily between ornithophilic mosquitoes and passeriform birds. Worldwide, Culex spp. are considered to be the primary vectors for WNV transmission; members of the Cx. pipiens complex are the principal vectors of WNV in northeastern and north central US. The SP variant described here was attenuated in Cx. pipiens following both parenteral and peroral infection, and it exhibited lower dissemination and transmission rates at 14 days following feeding as compared to WT. These results suggest that SP has a defect that blocks cell-to-cell spread. Future studies are planned using the SP variant as a tool to help elucidate the determinants of WNV spread in vivo. The observation that WNV exists as a genetically diverse population in its natural mosquito and avian hosts (Jerzak et al., 2005) is most likely a consequence of the high mutation rate resulting from the error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Domingo et al., 2005). In studies of other flaviviruses where mutations were chemically induced, the small-plaque phenotypes did not appear to be stable with in vitro passaging, but rather demonstrated high rates of reversion. More than 2/3 of ts and/or small-plaque mutants of DENV-4 lost these phenotypes after two rounds of biological cloning (Blaney et al., 2002); similarly, >80% of JEV clones lost the ts phenotype during three rounds of plaque purification (Eastman & Blair, 1985). The WNV SP variant described here was stable through three rounds of plaque purification and two amplification rounds that were carried out before the current experiments were performed. During subsequent growth assays, the small-plaque phenotype was retained in all cell lines except Vero and DF-1 grown at temperatures at or above 41°C. The correlation of the change to a mixed plaque size phenotype with in vitro growth under the stressful condition of high temperature suggests a selective advantage for the larger-plaque phenotype. It was interesting that larger plaques were not generated when SP was grown in PDE cells at 41°C; the lack of change in plaque phenotyope may explain why no virus growth was detected in this cell culture when the temperature was raised to 42.5°C. It is not clear why SP reverted to a mixed-plaque phenotype in DF-1 but not in PDE, since both cell lines are of avian origin. In contrast to the in vitro results, phenotypic reversion to WT plaque sizes was observed at all incubation temperatures, from 15°C to 32°C, after infection of live mosquitoes with SP. SP virus that exhibited a mixed plaque phenotype after recovery from mosquitoes often had titers similar to those of WT, although phenotypic reversion of SP in vitro did not appear to restore replication efficiency to WT levels. Small plaque variants commonly are found in natural populations. We have isolated seven additional small plaque variants from other WNV isolates collected in NY from 2000–2004, each having mutations different from those detected in the particular SP variant characterized in this study (data not shown). Using site-directed mutagenesis, Davis et al. demonstrated that a mutation in the NS4B protein (E249G) in combination with either a mutation in the NS5 protein (A804V) or three mutations in the 3′ UTR (A10596G, C10774U, A10799G) were sufficient to produce the small plaque, ts, and attenuated phenotypes exhibited by six viruses isolated in Texas in 2003 (Davis et al., 2004; Davis et al., 2007). Other work has shown that WNV containing only the E249G mutation in NS4B exhibited smaller plaques, slower growth kinetics, and decreased RNA synthesis as compared to the wild-type virus (Puig-Basagoiti et al, 2007). These data illustrate that different mutations in the WNV genome can produce virus variants with small plaque phenotypes. The SP sequence contained four nucleotide changes from the sequence of WT. Two of these changes resulted in amino acid substitutions, a P54S change in the prM protein and a V61A change in the NS2A protein. The prM protein plays a crucial role in virus assembly and transportation and exhibits a chaperone-like activity critical for proper folding and maturation of the viral E protein (Brinton, 2002). A deletion at the cleavage site of prM of TBEV did not influence virus replication and release from infected BHK cells, but the progeny virus lost the ability to infect new BHK cells; infectivity was restored by the addition of trypsin (Elshuber et al., 2003). A different mutation in prM of TBEV reduced particle secretion, but did not affect envelope protein folding or the chaperone-like activity of prM (Yoshii et al., 2004). NS2A is a small hydrophobic protein that plays an important role in virus replication (Brinton, 2002) and is a major inhibitor of interferon promoter-driven transcription (Liu et al., 2005). A single amino acid substitution in the NS2A (A30P) region of a Kunjin isolate (WNVKUN) resulted in attenuation of both neurovirulence and neuroinvasiveness (Liu et al., 2006). Sequencing of the SP mixed plaque population revealed that 35 out of 40 large plaques from mosquitoes and cells had reverted to the WT sequence at prM 625, three reverted to the WT sequence at NS2A 3707, and one reverted at both positions (Table 4). These data suggest that the prM mutation in SP may contribute to its small plaque phenotype, although the NS2A mutation may also be involved. However, 14 out of 30 small plaques also reverted at prM 625 and two reverted at NS2A 3707, indicating that genotypic reversion at either of these positions is not sufficient to restore the WT plaque size phenotype. In addition, as the entire genomes of the plaque-purified viruses were not sequenced, we cannot evaluate the potential contributions of any other sequence changes that may be present. Studies are currently underway to determine the relative contributions of the prM and NS2A amino acid changes to the SP phenotypes observed here; this information should enable the potential mechanism of attenuation of the SP variant to be clarified. Materials and Methods Viruses and Cells African green monkey kidney cells (Vero, ATCC #CCL-81) were grown in minimal essential medium (MEM; Gibco, Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100µg/ml of streptomycin. Aedes albopictus cells (C6/36; ATCC #CRL-1660) were grown in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM L-glutamine, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100 µg/ml of streptomycin. Chicken embryo fibroblasts (DF-1; ATCC #CRL-12203) were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; ATCC, Manassas, VA) with 10% FBS, 4mM L-glutamine, 4.5g/L glucose, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100µg/ml of streptomycin. Peking duck embyro fibroblasts (PDE; ATCC #CCL-141) were grown in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100µg/ml of streptomycin. The WT WNV strain 3356K was isolated in Vero cell culture from the kidney of an American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) collected in New York in 2000 and passed twice in Vero cells to amplify the virus. The SP variant was selected from the first Vero cell passage, and then subjected to two sequential rounds of plaque purification (total of three plaque-to-plaque transfers), followed by two rounds of amplification in Vero cells. The cell culture supernatants from the second round Vero cell amplification of WT and SP were clarified by centrifugation at 3220×g for 10 min, supplemented with 20% FBS, and aliquots were stored at −80°C as virus stocks. All in vitro experiments and in vivo mosquito inoculation studies were performed using the second round Vero-amplified virus stocks. For the mosquito vector competence studies, second round Vero-amplified virus stocks of WT and SP were amplified once in C6/36 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 plaque forming units (pfu)/cell, based on Vero cell titer, and were harvested at 96 hrs post-infection, as described above. Mosquitoes Culex pipiens were originally collected as egg rafts in Pennsylvania in 2004 by M Hutchinson (Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection) and were colonized at the Arbovirus Laboratories, Wadsworth Center. Mosquitoes were maintained as previously described (Ebel et al., 2005) in 12”×12”×12” cages at 27°C with 16:8 hours light:dark photoperiod and provided 10% sucrose ad lib. Measurement of Plaque Size WT and SP viral stocks were inoculated onto Vero cells in 6-well culture plates as described previously (Payne et al., 2006). After staining with neutral red, plaques were examined at 72 hours post-infection using a Zeiss Stemi 2000-C stereo microscope, and images were captured with a Zeiss Axiocam MRC digital camera. Plaque sizes were measured using AxioVision 3.0 software (Zeiss, Germany). For analysis, 200 individual plaques were measured for each virus. In vitro growth kinetics Vero, C6/36, DF-1, and PDE cells were seeded in Costar 6-well culture cluster plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY) at 37°C, 28°C, 39°C, and 37°C respectively, in 5% CO2. Confluent cell monolayers were inoculated with virus at an MOI of 0.01, based on Vero cell titer. After 1 hr of viral adsorption, the inoculum was removed and the monolayers were washed and overlayed with 3 ml of the appropriate maintenance medium containing 2% FBS. Vertebrate cells were incubated at each of the following temperatures: 30°C, 34°C, 37°C, 40°C (39°C for DF-1 and PDE), 41°C, and 42.5°C (Vero, DF-1, PDE). Mosquito cells were incubated at 26°C, 28°C, 30°C, and 34°C. The temperatures for virus adsorption were the same as the incubation temperature used subsequently in all growth curve experiments. Samples were harvested at 12 (for PDE), 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hrs post-infection into media containing 20% FBS and were stored at −80°C. All growth curves were performed using triplicate wells. Plaque assays were conducted as described above. Viral titers were calculated and expressed as log10pfu/0.1ml. Determination of mosquito ID50 Four groups (n=20 each) of six-day old Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were inoculated IT essentially as previously described (Rosen & Gubler, 1974) with approximately 10, 1, 0.1 or 0.01 pfu of either SP or WT. Inoculated mosquitoes were maintained at 27°C, with a 16:8 light:dark photoperiod, and were provided with a 10% sucrose solution ad lib on cotton wicks. On day 7 post-inoculation, mosquitoes were individually frozen in 1.0 ml of mosquito diluent (MD: PBS with 20% FBS, 100units/ml penicillin, 100µg/ml streptomycin, 0.25µg/ml fungizone, and 10µg/mL gentamicin) for subsequent trituration and screening on Vero cell culture to determine infection rates at each dose. In vivo growth kinetics in Cx. pipiens Six-day old Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were inoculated IT with WT or SP at ten times the ID50 and maintained at 15°C, 27°C or 32°C, as described above. Immediately following inoculation, 5 mosquitoes were placed individually in 1.0 ml mosquito diluent and stored at −80°C for subsequent trituration and titration on Vero cells. At each subsequent timepoint, 10 mosquitoes per virus strain were harvested, as described above. Vector competence of Cx. pipiens Four- to six-day old female Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were deprived of sucrose solution for approximately 44 hrs and then allowed to feed for one hr on gauze pledgets soaked with defibrinated goose blood containing 108.4 pfu/ml of either WT or SP virus supplemented with 2.5% sucrose. Fully engorged mosquitoes were removed to pint cartons, incubated at 27°C under a 16:8 light:dark photoperiod, and provided a 10% sucrose solution ad lib on cotton wicks. After 7 and 14 days post feeding (PF), mosquito salivary secretions were collected in capillary tubes charged with 50% sucrose plus fetal bovine serum (1:1), as previously described (Ebel et al., 2005) to estimate transmission rates. Bodies and legs were placed in separate microfuge tubes with 1.0 ml mosquito diluent, homogenized using a rapid high speed mechanical homogenizer (Mixer Mill MM300; Qiagen, Valencia, CA) for 30 s at 24 cycles/s, and clarified by centrifugation (4 min at 5796 × g). Bodies, legs, and salivary secretions were screened or titrated in Vero cell culture to determine infection, dissemination, and transmission rates, respectively. Genome sequencing and analysis Nucleotide sequencing of the full genome of SP and WT was conducted as described (Davis et al., 2005). Briefly, viral RNA was extracted directly from 100 µl of the second round Vero-amplified virus stocks using the QiaAMP viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen,Valencia, CA). The genomic RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified in 16 overlapping fragments using one-step RT-PCR (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RT-PCR products were electrophoretically separated on a 1.5% agarose gel, and bands of the appropriate size were excised and gel purified using the QiaQuick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Full-length sequencing was carried out using multiple pairs of overlapping primers and was performed using an ABI 373 or 377 automated sequencer according to the manufacturer protocols. A comprehensive description of the amplification and sequencing primers is available from the corresponding author. Sequences were compiled and edited using the SeqMan module of the DNAStar software package (DNAStar, Inc., Madison, WI) with a minimum of two-fold redundancy throughout for sequence data to be considered complete. Sequences were aligned using MegAlign within DNAStar, and changes between the SP variant and WT sequence were documented. Sequence analysis of revertant SP virus from mosquitoes and cells Virus derived from SP infected mosquitoes by IT inoculation (two mosquitoes from each incubation temperature) or harvested from Vero or DF-1 cells incubated at 42.5°C with reverted plaque phenotype, were plated on Vero cells. Ten plaques (five large and five small plaques) were picked from each mosquito-derived virus, and five large plaques were picked from cell culture-derived viruses. Viral RNA extraction, RT-PCR, sequencing, and sequence analysis were conducted as described above. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge Pamela Chin for overseeing mosquito rearing and the excellent technical assistance provided by Amy Lovelace, Alexander Ciota, Linda Styer, and Ann Payne, as well as other members of Arbovirus Laboratories, in assisting with cell culture work. We thank the Wadsworth Center Media and Tissue Culture Facility for providing cells and media for this work and the Wadsworth Center Sequencing Core for providing sequencing data. This work was supported partially by federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health (contract number NO1-AI-25490). Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Science. 1999 Dec 17; 286(5448):2333-7.
[Science. 1999]Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Jul; 9(7):853-6.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 2003]Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Aug; 73(2):474-6.
[Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005]Int J Health Geogr. 2006 May 16; 5():21.
[Int J Health Geogr. 2006]Virology. 2004 Dec 5; 330(1):342-50.
[Virology. 2004]Infect Immun. 1976 Nov; 14(5):1221-7.
[Infect Immun. 1976]Virus Res. 1997 Oct; 51(2):173-81.
[Virus Res. 1997]J Virol. 2001 Oct; 75(20):9731-40.
[J Virol. 2001]Virology. 2002 Aug 15; 300(1):125-39.
[Virology. 2002]Arch Virol. 2003 May; 148(5):999-1006.
[Arch Virol. 2003]J Virol. 2000 Apr; 74(7):3011-9.
[J Virol. 2000]Virology. 2004 Dec 5; 330(1):342-50.
[Virology. 2004]Infect Immun. 1976 Nov; 14(5):1221-7.
[Infect Immun. 1976]J Virol. 2001 Oct; 75(20):9731-40.
[J Virol. 2001]Virology. 2002 Aug 15; 300(1):125-39.
[Virology. 2002]J Gen Virol. 2005 Aug; 86(Pt 8):2175-83.
[J Gen Virol. 2005]Virus Res. 2005 Feb; 107(2):129-39.
[Virus Res. 2005]Virology. 2002 Aug 15; 300(1):125-39.
[Virology. 2002]J Virol. 1985 Sep; 55(3):611-6.
[J Virol. 1985]Virology. 2004 Dec 5; 330(1):342-50.
[Virology. 2004]J Virol. 2007 Jun; 81(11):6111-6.
[J Virol. 2007]Virology. 2007 Apr 25; 361(1):229-41.
[Virology. 2007]J Gen Virol. 2003 Jan; 84(Pt 1):183-91.
[J Gen Virol. 2003]J Gen Virol. 2004 Oct; 85(Pt 10):3049-58.
[J Gen Virol. 2004]J Virol. 2005 Feb; 79(3):1934-42.
[J Virol. 2005]J Virol. 2006 Mar; 80(5):2396-404.
[J Virol. 2006]J Med Entomol. 2005 Sep; 42(5):838-43.
[J Med Entomol. 2005]J Virol Methods. 2006 Jun; 134(1-2):183-9.
[J Virol Methods. 2006]Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974 Nov; 23(6):1153-60.
[Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974]J Med Entomol. 2005 Sep; 42(5):838-43.
[J Med Entomol. 2005]Virology. 2005 Nov 25; 342(2):252-65.
[Virology. 2005]