![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, The Rockefeller University Press Article Aberrant lysosomal carbohydrate storage accompanies endocytic defects and neurodegeneration in Drosophila benchwarmer 1Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 3Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 4Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, Flanders Interuniversity Institute of Biotechnology (VIB), University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium 5Division of Pediatrics, University of Leuven, School of Medicine, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Correspondence to Hugo J. Bellen: hbellen/at/bcm.tmc.edu Received December 1, 2004; Accepted June 1, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Lysosomal storage is the most common cause of neurodegenerative brain disease in preadulthood. However, the underlying cellular mechanisms that lead to neuronal dysfunction are unknown. Here, we report that loss of Drosophila benchwarmer (bnch), a predicted lysosomal sugar carrier, leads to carbohydrate storage in yolk spheres during oogenesis and results in widespread accumulation of enlarged lysosomal and late endosomal inclusions. At the bnch larval neuromuscular junction, we observe similar inclusions and find defects in synaptic vesicle recycling at the level of endocytosis. In addition, loss of bnch slows endosome-to-lysosome trafficking in larval garland cells. In adult bnch flies, we observe age-dependent synaptic dysfunction and neuronal degeneration. Finally, we find that loss of bnch strongly enhances tau neurotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner. We hypothesize that, in bnch, defective lysosomal carbohydrate efflux leads to endocytic defects with functional consequences in synaptic strength, neuronal viability, and tau neurotoxicity. Introduction Intact lysosomal function is critical for normal neuronal functioning and survival (Nixon and Cataldo, 1995). In humans, this is most readily illustrated by a group of inherited childhood diseases called lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) (Neufeld, 1991), in which neuronal brain degeneration is a frequent pathological feature (Walkley, 1998). In preadulthood, lysosomal storage, mainly in the form of lipofuscinosis, is the most common cause of neurodegeneration (Cooper, 2003). In LSDs, lysosomes increase in number and size through the gradual intra-lysosomal build up of storage material. In most cases, substrates accumulate due to the loss of lysosomal hydrolytic enzyme activity, although other causes, such as defective efflux of normally degraded constituents by lysosomal transporters, are also known (Eskelinen et al., 2003). Although studies of LSDs have provided tremendous insights into the biochemical details of lysosomal hydrolytic degradation and although the role of sphingolipid accumulation in endocytic membrane sorting is becoming increasingly recognized (Sillence and Platt, 2003), the cellular mechanism by which lysosomal storage disrupts neuronal viability and membrane trafficking is incompletely understood (Futerman and van Meer, 2004). This is important, however, because the tight association of LSDs with neuronal degeneration suggests that similar mechanisms leading to neurological dysfunction might be shared by at least some of these disorders. Furthermore, understanding the link between lysosomal dysfunction and neurodegeneration is likely to be important for highly prevalent neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease. Indeed, endosomal and lysosomal alterations have since long been thought to be an early and prominent feature in Alzheimer's disease (Nixon et al., 2001). In recent years, Drosophila has become an established model system to study neurodegeneration by using endogenous loss-of-function and heterologous toxic gain-of-function or misexpression approaches (Muqit and Feany, 2002; Bonini and Fortini, 2003). However, no Drosophila models exist that conclusively link a primary lysosomal defect with progressive neurodegeneration, although mutants including eggroll and blue cheese have suggested such a causal relationship (Min and Benzer, 1997; Finley et al., 2003). We report here a neurodegenerative mutant called benchwarmer (bnch), and establish bnch as a model for lysosomal storage-related neurodegeneration. bnch appears most similar to LSDs like sialic acid storage disease and Niemann-Pick disease type C, which are caused by defects in the removal or transport of substrate from lysosomes. Since we first reported bnch alleles (Kania, 1996), others have isolated allelic Drosophila mutations in screens for abnormal sexual behavior and larval neuromuscular synapse formation, which were assigned the name spinster and diphthong, respectively (Nakano et al., 2001; Sweeney and Davis, 2002). Besides reported defects in courtship behavior, hypomorphic bnch flies have a decreased adult life span, a reduction of neuronal programmed cell death in the pupal central nervous system. and accumulate neuronal autofluorescent pigments (Nakano et al., 2001). In third instar larvae, loss of bnch further causes neuromuscular synaptic overgrowth that is due to increased TGF-β signaling (Sweeney and Davis, 2002). Overexpression of the human homologue in human embryonic kidney cells results in nonapoptotic autophagic/necrotic cell death (Yanagisawa et al., 2003), and loss of the Zebrafish homologue, not really started (nrs), leads to embryonic lethality characterized by accumulation of opaque substances in the yolk (Young et al., 2002). Although these studies have revealed developmental functions of bnch in synaptic growth, decreased programmed cell death, and late endosomal/lysosomal function, its role in the adult nervous system remains uncharacterized. Here, we demonstrate that loss of bnch leads to lysosomal carbohydrate storage, synaptic defects, subsequent progressive neuronal degeneration, and enhanced tau-mediated toxicity. Ultrastructural, electrophysiological, histological, and endocytic tracer analysis suggest that these phenotypes result from aberrant lysosomal function and defects in endocytic membrane trafficking. Results bnch is a semi-lethal locus encoding a highly conserved predicted sugar transporter of the major facilitator superfamily We identified the bnch mutation in an enhancer detector screen for genes expressed in the nervous system (Kania et al., 1995): P{LacW}[25/11] is inserted 19 bp upstream of the transcription start site of CG8428 (Fig. 1
Bnch has been reported as a transporter-like protein with 8 putative transmembrane domains (Nakano et al., 2001; Sweeney and Davis, 2002; Young et al., 2002). However, we found a predicted 12-transmembrane domain structure, and homology searches identify significant similarity to transporters of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) (Fig. 1 By imprecise P-element excision, small deletions (Δ29, Δ31, Δ86) were generated that disrupt transcription of CG8428 (Fig. 1 Complementation analysis with our excision alleles, point mutations, and the reported bnch[Δ2B] null allele (Sweeney and Davis, 2002) reveals that our bnch alleles are null, or at least strong loss-of-function alleles (Fig. 1 bnch germline clones reveal oogenesis defects associated with defective mobilization of carbohydrates from yolk β-spheres Developmental gene expression of bnch suggests an important maternal component during early stages of embryonic development (http://genome.med.yale.edu/Lifecycle/) (Arbeitman et al., 2002) that is possibly responsible for the late lethal phase associated with zygotic loss of bnch. Moreover, in zebrafish, loss of the bnch homologue nrs results in early embryonic lethality and defective yolk metabolism (Young et al., 2002). To uncover early developmental consequences of loss of bnch in Drosophila, we generated germline clones. In the absence of bnch in the germline, few eggs are laid and none become fertilized. The eggs are small, varying from 1/3 to 2/3 of wild-type size (Fig. 2, A and D
Because bnch is implicated in late-endosomal/lysosomal function and because degradation of yolk protein and carbohydrates in the lysosome-related yolk spheres is crucial for Drosophila oogenesis (DiMario and Mahowald, 1987), we labeled bnch mutant mature oocytes using Lysotracker. Interestingly, we found that the size of acidic vesicles in the bnch-deficient ooplasm is dramatically increased compared with wild type (Fig. 2, B and C During the last stages of Drosophila oogenesis, protein and carbohydrate reserves are compartmentalized in two different types of yolk spheres and can be differentiated histologically using the periodic acid Schiff (PAS) method (Gutzeit et al., 1994). We therefore performed PAS staining in bnch mutant and control mature oocytes. Although control ooplasm contained similarly sized PAS-negative protein containing α-spheres and PAS-positive carbohydrate containing β-spheres (Fig. 2, E and E Together, our germline clonal analyses indicate that bnch is required for oogenesis and female fertility. At a subcellular level, bnch functions in this process in a subtype of ooplasmic yolk spheres that is specialized in regulated degradation of yolk carbohydrates, but not proteins. Given the lysosomal localization of Bnch (Sweeney and Davis, 2002) and in agreement with its predicted role as a possible sugar transporter, we hypothesize that the oogenesis and fertility defects caused by maternal loss of bnch are related to defective efflux of nutritional carbohydrates from yolk spheres. bnch mutant eyes accumulate membranous inclusions corresponding to late endosomal, autophagic, and lysosomal structures Previous studies have suggested a role for bnch in late endosomal/lysosomal membrane trafficking and neuromuscular synapse growth (Nakano et al., 2001; Sweeney and Davis, 2002). To examine the subcellular and developmental consequences of zygotic loss of bnch in the visual system, we performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies of adult homozygous eyes. Because bnch escaper frequencies are generally low and escapers have a short life span, we used the eyFLP system to generate clones in the retina and the lamina (Fig. 3
In the lamina, bnch mutant cartridges also accumulated large membranous inclusions, mainly in the glial cell bodies (Fig. 3 The membranous cytoplasmic inclusions are morphologically highly heterogeneous and vary in size from 0.2 to 2.5 μm (Fig. 4
A second population of inclusions, found in the photoreceptors but not in the laminar glia, consists of organelles with a single limiting membrane surrounding many small regularly shaped internal vesicles (Fig. 3 These data suggest that loss of bnch in eyFLP clones does not cause striking developmental defects in the visual system. However, the accumulation of enlarged lysosomes with partially degraded contents suggests important defects in lysosomal degradation. In the endocytotically highly active photoreceptors (Stark et al., 1988), this primary lysosomal defect is accompanied by a dramatic expansion and accumulation of MVBs. Abnormal membranous inclusions and decreased synaptic vesicle endocytosis at the bnch larval neuromuscular junction In neurons, late endosomes and lysosomes are predominantly located in the soma (Parton et al., 1992). However, the nerve terminal produces significant amounts of endocytic and autophagic cargo destined for degradation (Hollenbeck, 1993). It is assumed that these prelysosomal organelles (Parton et al., 1992; Hollenbeck, 1993) undergo retrograde axonal transport and that their cargo is degraded in lysosomal compartments along the axon and in the soma (Overly et al., 1995; Overly and Hollenbeck, 1996). At the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of bnch mutants, however, Sweeney and Davis (2002) reported an expanded presynaptic vesicular compartment that is acidic as evidenced by Lysotracker staining. Interestingly, at the larval NMJ we observe abnormal ultrastructural membrane compartments in the cytoplasm of bnch mutant boutons (Fig. 5
To determine if the observed ultrastructural defects in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments functionally impair exocytosis and/or endocytosis at the bnch larval NMJ, we stimulated the motor neurons and recorded excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) of abdominal muscles. In 1 mM Ca2+ the amplitude of EJPs in bnch transheterozygotes is slightly but statistically not significantly decreased compared with controls. Hence, bnch barely affects exocytosis in this paradigm (Fig. 5 To test the possibility of impaired synaptic vesicle recycling and endocytosis more directly, we incubated third instar fillets with FM1-43, a dye that is internalized into vesicles during clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Betz et al., 1992). To distinguish between the readily releasable pool (RRP) and reserve pool (RP) of synaptic vesicles, we used an FM1-43 labeling protocol to first load the total recycling pool (RRP plus RP) and subsequently selectively unload the RRP (Kuromi and Kidokoro, 2002). Interestingly, in bnch mutant boutons, we observed a significant nearly 20% decrease in uptake of FM1-43 compared with controls, whereas unloading of the RRP was similar in bnch mutants and controls (Fig. 5, G and H bnch mutations affect endosome-to-lysosome trafficking in garland cells Our ultrastructural analysis in the visual system reveals a dramatic accumulation of abnormal inclusions suggestive of a primary lysosomal defect. Moreover, the accumulation of MVBs in mutant photoreceptors is consistent with a decreased rate of endosome-to-lysosome trafficking, and at bnch mutant neuromuscular synapses we find defects consistent with impaired synaptic vesicle recycling at the level of endocytosis. To further test if bnch mutations affect dynamic aspects of endocytosis, we performed endocytic tracer uptake experiments in live larval garland cells (Fig. 6
Synaptic function is impaired in the visual system of bnch escapers and age-dependently deteriorates in bnch eye mosaics To examine the functional consequences of loss of bnch at visual synapses, we performed electroretinogram (ERG) recordings (Fig. 7
In adult bnch escapers, ERGs recorded <4 d after eclosion are also abnormal (Fig. 7 Together, these results demonstrate that loss of bnch leads to defects in visual synaptic transmission that deteriorate in an age-dependent manner. bnch mutations cause age-dependent neurodegeneration associated with carbohydrate-containing granules Because adult homozygous bnch escapers exhibit progressive behavioral defects and because bnch mutant eyes show progressive visual synaptic defects, we studied the morphology of their central nervous system. Previously, loss of bnch has been reported to cause a longer abdominal ganglion in adult hypomorphic flies due to decreased developmental programmed cell death (Nakano et al., 2001). Similar to Nakano et al. (2001), we also observe a longer abdominal ganglion in 4-d-old bnch escapers (unpublished data). However, sagittal histological sections through the abdominal ganglion reveals vacuolization of the tissue (see online supplemental data, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200412001/DC1), suggesting that neuronal degeneration occurs after the developmental apoptotic defect responsible for the abnormally long ventral ganglion. In agreement, we observe severe neuronal loss in histological sections of brains of bnch null pharate adults and escapers. This neuronal loss is characterized by a significant decrease in the number of neuronal cell bodies and severe vacuolization in cortical brain layers (Fig. 8, A and B
Because we found a role for Bnch in mobilizing carbohydrates from yolk spheres during oogenesis and because bnch mutant neuronal tissue accumulates abnormal lysosomal inclusions, we also stained the nervous system of 4-d-old bnch escapers using the PAS method for carbohydrates. Interestingly, although no obvious defects were observed in 1-d-old flies (unpublished data), 4-d-old flies showed a loss of retinal structural integrity associated with the accumulation of PAS-positive granules (Fig. 8, C and D To further address whether the observed neuronal loss has a progressive character, we tested if the lesions worsen in an age-dependent manner in adult flies. Because bnch adult escapers eclose at low frequencies and die after a few days, we generated bnch eye mosaics (Newsome et al., 2000) and studied the progressive nature of bnch-associated neuronal loss in adult eye clones. Although the external morphology of bnch eyes appears macroscopically normal, histological light microscopy sections reveal vacuoles throughout the retina in 1-d-old flies (Fig. 8 Together with the ultrastructural demonstration of abnormal multilamellar inclusions, these data suggest that loss of bnch leads to progressive neurodegeneration associated with the accumulation of carbohydrate-storing lysosomes. Loss of bnch dose-dependently enhances tau toxicity Our phenotypic analysis and the possible role of bnch as a sugar carrier suggest strong similarities between bnch and a subclass of neurodegenerative LSDs that are caused by defective efflux of lysosomal substrates. In humans, sialic acid storage disorder and Niemann-Pick disease type C are caused by defective efflux of acidic sugars and cholesterol, respectively (Walkley, 2001), and in both diseases the pathological hallmarks of LSD are accompanied by tauopathy in the form of neurofibrillary tangles (Autio-Harmainen et al., 1988; Auer et al., 1995). However, the question of whether neurofibrillary tangles constitute a pathogenic lesion in such disorders is controversial (German et al., 2001; Treiber-Held et al., 2003). To test the possibility of whether defective lysosomal function due to loss of bnch is able to trigger tauopathy, we used a reported tauopathy fly model that expresses the longest four repeat isoform of human wild-type tau in the eye (GMR-htau4R) (Jackson et al., 2002). This model behaves as a genetically sensitized system that allows the identification of genetic modifiers of tau-mediated neurodegeneration by assessing roughening of the eye as a quantitative readout of tau toxicity. We combined this model with the eyFLP system to generate homozygous bnch eyes that simultaneously express one copy of the GMR-htau4R transgene and compared such eyes with several controls. As shown in Fig. 9
Discussion A Drosophila model for human neurodegenerative lysosomal efflux disorders Although mutations in the human homologues of bnch are not a known cause of human disease, the present study suggests that the bnch mutant phenotype is very closely related to the human neurodegenerative LSDs. Together with the reported subcellular lysosomal localization of Bnch (Sweeney and Davis, 2002), the present demonstration of progressive neurodegeneration characterized by dramatic ultrastructural lysosomal abnormalities links a primary lysosomal defect to neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Not only are the ultrastructural characteristics highly similar to the lesions observed in human LSDs, but the predicted molecular nature of the Bnch protein as a lysosomal transporter protein further suggests similarity with a subset of LSDs that are caused by defective efflux of substrates from lysosomes. Interestingly, the human protein sialin, which is defective in sialic acid storage disease (Verheijen et al., 1999), is very similar to bnch as it is an MFS transporter of the ACS subfamily (Pao et al., 1998). Based mainly on the accumulation of autofluorescent pigments, previous studies have emphasized the similarities between bnch phenotypes and LSDs called neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (Nakano et al., 2001; Sanyal and Ramaswami, 2002; Sweeney and Davis, 2002). In addition, here we point out the striking similarities between bnch and human lysosomal efflux disorders. More specifically, from both a molecular mechanistic and phenotypic point of view, bnch appears similar to sialic acid storage disease, a lysosomal acid sugar efflux disorder with severe neurodegeneration characterized by neuronal accumulation of abnormal lysosomes including lipofuscin pigments and neurofibrillary tangles (Autio-Harmainen et al., 1988). Given our data suggesting a role of bnch in lysosomal carbohydrate metabolism, it is tempting to propose bnch as a candidate gene for either the molecularly undefined lysosomal neutral hexose or N-acetylhexosamine transporter systems (Mancini et al., 1990). Lysosomes are present at the presynaptic terminal and function in synaptic vesicle recycling Despite their high rates of membrane turnover, presynaptic terminals are not known to contain active lysosomal-degradative compartments (Nixon and Cataldo, 1995). Nevertheless, the local regulation of endocytosis at the nerve terminal is crucial for the function of synapses in the nervous system due to its role in synaptic vesicle recycling (Murthy and De Camilli, 2003). However, the extent to which endosomal compartments impinge on the synaptic vesicle cycle is not completely understood and controversial. Together with the previously reported observation that bnch mutant NMJ boutons accumulate expanded acidic organelles (Sweeney and Davis, 2002), our ultrastructural and physiological data indicate that nerve terminals contain degradative compartments that are important for normal synaptic function. Aberrant lysosomal sugar storage accompanies endocytic defects, neurodegeneration, and enhanced tau neurotoxicity Besides severe neurodegeneration and alterations in lysosomal morphology, our phenotypic analysis of bnch mutants indicates morphological and functional alterations in endocytic compartments. The evidence comes mainly from cell types that have high rates of membrane trafficking. First, in the photoreceptors, known for their high rate of membrane turnover and endocytosis (Stark et al., 1988), loss of bnch induces a dramatic increase in number and size of enlarged late endosomal MVBs, suggestive of a block downstream of the late endosomal compartment. Second, we observed reduced endosome-to-lysosome trafficking in bnch mutant garland cells, a cell type with high rates of fluid phase endocytosis. Third, at bnch mutant NMJ synapses, we observed defects in endocytosis and synaptic vesicle recycling, further suggesting functional abnormalities in extralysosomal membrane compartments. In contrast with hrs mutants, in which a specific functional endosomal defect leads to phenotypes suggestive of increased receptor tyrosine kinase signaling (Lloyd et al., 2002), loss of bnch does not seem to result in phenotypes indicative of a downstream defect in a specific pathway. However, as bnch most likely functions at the level of lysosomal degradation, the cellular consequences of loss of bnch are expected to be highly pleiotropic, simultaneously affecting upstream autophagic and endocytic pathways that converge at the level of the lysosome. In addition, because Bnch, as a potential mobilizer of lysosomal carbohydrate reserves, is also highly expressed in glial cells, it is possible that the neurodegeneration seen in the bnch nervous system can be partially caused by lack of trophic sugar support of neurons by glia. Our observation that loss of bnch is a potent enhancer of tau neurotoxicity gives some clues as to how lysosomal dysfunction might lead to neurodegeneration. It is well established that tau is on the final common pathway in a wide range of human neurodegenerative diseases (Hardy et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2001), and our results give experimental in vivo evidence that alterations in lysosomal membrane compartments are able to induce tauopathy. Together with the fact that tauopathy has been reported in sialic acid storage disease (Autio-Harmainen et al., 1988) and is a highly consistent finding in Niemann-Pick disease type C (Auer et al., 1995), our results suggest a link between lysosomal function and tau pathology. Materials and methods Fly stocks, mitotic recombination, and phenotypic rescue The P{LacW}[25/11] insertion was obtained from I. Kiss (Kania et al., 1995). The P{LacW} [Δ29], [Δ31] and [Δ86] alleles were generated through imprecise excision and mapped by Southern blot. The l(2R)W5[11F5, N, E14.1, and P] alleles were obtained from Ruth Steward (Liu et al., 1999). For the studies in the eye, l(2R)W5[11F5, N, and E14.1] alleles and bnch[Δ2B] (provided by G. Davis and S. Sweeney) were recombined onto a P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D chromosome and crossed to yw P{ry[+t7.2]=ey-FLP.N}2 P{GMR-lacZ.C(38.1)}TPN1; P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D P{w[+t*ry[+t*]=white-un1}47A l(2)cl-R11[1]/CyO-KrGFP (obtained from Barry Dickson) (Newsome et al., 2000). For rescue of the degenerative defects in the eye the phenotypes of yw; P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D bnch[N]/P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D P{y[+t7.7] ry[+t7.2]=Car20y}44B, P{w[+mC]=GMR-hid}SS2, l(2)cl-R[1]; ey-Gal4, UAS-FLP/UAS-Spin-GFP and yw; P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D bnch[N]/P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D P{y[+t7.7] ry[+t7.2]=Car20y}44B, P{w[+mC]=GMR-hid}SS2, l(2)cl-R[1]; ey-Gal4, UAS-FLP/+ were compared. UAS-Spin-EGFP was given by S. Sweeney (Sweeney and Davis, 2002). For generation of germ line clones we used the ovoD technique and recombined the alleles l(2R)W5[11F5, N, P, and E14.1] and bnch[Δ2B] onto a P{w[+mW.hs]=FRT(w[hs])}G13(42B) chromosome (Chou and Perrimon, 1996). The gl-tau2.1 line (Jackson et al., 2002) expressing human 4-repeat tau in the eye was provided by George Jackson and is referred to as GMR-htau4R throughout the manuscript. For the tau interaction study yw; P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D spin[Δ2B]/CyO; gl-tau2.1/TM6b males were crossed to yw P{ry[+t7.2]=ey-FLP.N}2 P{GMR-lacZ.C(38.1)}TPN1; P{ry[+t7.2]=neoFRT}42D P{w[+t* ry[+t*]=white-un1}47A l(2)cl-R11[1]/CyO-KrGFP females and eye morphology of the progeny was compared. Photographs of the eyes are shown as a composite image from a Z-stack captured using a microscope (model MZ16; Leica) with a camera (Magnafire; Optronics) driven by InFocus v1.6 software (Meyer Instruments). The composite image was generated using the maximum local contrast algorithm in the ImagePro Plus v4.5.1 software (MediaCybernetics) and refined using Lucis Pro v5.0 software (Image Content Technology). DNA sequencing Genomic DNA was prepared from various alleles of l(2R)W5 in trans to another l(2R)W chromosome using Puregene (Gentra). PCR primers were designed using a modified Primer3 algorithm (http://flypush.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu/primer/) (Zhai et al., 2003). PCR reactions were performed using HotstarTaq (QIAGEN). Sequences were analyzed using Seqman II (DNAStar). Topology analysis The membrane topology of Bnch was predicted using the combined TMHMM/SignalP predictor Phobius (Kall et al., 2004). Lysotracker and PAS staining of ovaries After feeding flies on grape juice agar and fresh yeast paste for several days, ovaries were dissected in Schneider's Drosophila medium (SDM; GIBCO BRL). Ovarioles were gently separated and incubated for 15 min at RT in SDM with added Lysotracker (Molecular Probes, Inc.), diluted according to the manufacturer's instructions. After washing, ovarioles were mounted in SDM for confocal microscopy. Images were captured with a confocal microscope (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and processed with Amira 2.2 software and Adobe Photoshop 7. For PAS staining, ovaries were dissected and then fixed, dehydrated, and embedded as the adult flies (see below). Images were obtained using a light microscope (model BX61; Olympus) and AnalySIS 3.2. imaging software. ERG recordings For ERG recordings, flies were immobilized with nail polish. A sharp glass reference electrode was inserted in the thorax, while a sharp recording electrode, filled with 3 M NaCl, was placed on the eye (Alawi and Pak, 1971). Light flashes of 1 s or 500 ms were delivered using a halogen lamp. We performed recordings on at least seven flies per genotype. Data were digitized and stored on a PC with pClamp and analyzed with Clampfit and Microsoft Excel. TEM TEM preparation of adult eye retinae and laminae were performed as described previously (Fabian-Fine et al., 2003). 1-d-old flies were dissected and fixed at 4°C in 2% PFA; 2% glutaraldehyde; 0.1 M sodium cacodylate; 0.005% CaCl2, pH 7.2, and postfixed in 2% OsO4. 50-nm thin sections were stained in 4% uranyl acetate and 2.5% lead nitrate. Larvae were dissected in fixative and prepared for TEM as described previously (Verstreken et al., 2002). Data were captured with an electron microscope (model JEM-1010; JEOL), and images were processed in Photoshop 7 (Adobe) and assembled in CorelDRAW 12 (Corel). Larval NMJ electrophysiology and FM1-43 dye uptake Third instar larval muscle recordings were performed as described in the online supplemental data (Verstreken et al., 2002). Larvae were dissected and recordings were performed in modified HL3 (mM): NaCl (110), KCl (5), NaHCO3 (10), Hepes (5), sucrose (30), trehalose (5), CaCl2 (1), and MgCl2 (20) (pH 7.2). For FM1-43 experiments, larvae were incubated in modified HL3 with 1.5 mM CaCl2 and 10 μm FM1-43FX. Preparations were nerve stimulated at 2× threshold at 30 Hz for 5 min; the FM1-43 dye was left in the bath for an additional 5 min. Such a labeling protocol is assumed to label vesicles in the RRP (exo/endo recycling pool) as well as in the RP (Kuromi and Kidokoro, 2002). Preparations were then extensively washed with 0 Ca2+ solution and boutons in the stimulated segment were imaged with a confocal microscope (model 510; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.). To unload the RRP (but not the RP), preparations were subsequently incubated in 90-mM KCl solution with 1.5 mM CaCl2 (in modified HL3 with 25 mM NaCl to preserve osmolarity) for 5 min. After extensive washing in 0 Ca2+ solution, the same synapses were imaged again. Quantification of FM1-43 fluorescence after loading or unloading was performed as described previously (Verstreken et al., 2003; Koh et al., 2004). FM1-43 data were captured with an upright confocal microscope (model 510; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.), processed with Amira 2.2 using the projection view module with bilinear interpolation (Template Graphics Software, Inc.), and images were processed in Photoshop 7 (Adobe) and assembled in CorelDRAW 12 (Corel). Histological stainings and sections of the adult nervous system Fly heads were fixed in 1.25% glutaraldehyde in PBT for 1–2 h on ice and dehydrated. After equilibration in xylene-paraffin, the heads were incubated in paraffin at 58°C for 3–4 h. The heads were then reoriented in melted paraffin blocks and allowed to solidify. The blocks were cooled down on ice and sliced into 10-μm sections with a microtome. The sections were then rinsed in distilled water and stained with hematoxylin (Gill's formulation #1; Fisher Scientific) for 3 min and de-stained in tap water for 5 min. The stain was fixed in a 0.25% HCl solution in 70% ethanol. After a series of tap water and distilled water rinses, the sections were counterstained in eosin (Y solution; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 min and de-stained in ethanol. Slides were then transferred into xylene and mounted in Permount (Fisher Scientific). Images were captured using a microscope (Axiophot; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.). For PAS staining, adult flies were fixed overnight in 4% formaldehyde in PBS. To facilitate entry of fixative and subsequent solvents during dehydration and embedding, several openings were made in the head, thorax, and abdomen. Flies were dehydrated through ethanol series, methylbenzoate and paraffin embedded. Sections of 10 μm were made on a microtome (model 5040; Bright Instruments). PAS staining was performed as described previously (Gutzeit et al., 1994). For light microscopy of adult retina, specimens were dissected, fixed, mounted, and stained with toluidine blue as described previously (Tomlinson and Ready, 1987). Images were captured using a microscope (Axiophot; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.). Endocytic tracer studies Garland cell uptake studies were performed by incubating cells in Schneider's medium containing 0.2 mg/ml Alexa 488–conjugated avidin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 50 nM Lysotracker. Live cells were imaged and data were captured with an upright confocal microscope (model 510; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.), processed with Amira 2.2 using the projection view module with bilinear interpolation (Template Graphics Software, Inc.), and images were processed in Photoshop 7 (Adobe) and assembled in CorelDRAW 12 (Corel). Online supplemental material The supplemental figure contains histological sagittal sections stained with the PAS method of the ventral ganglion of a bnch transheterozygous escaper (B) at the same level as the control (shown in A). Numerous vacuoles typical for neurodegeneration can be observed in the bnch ventral ganglion (arrows). Online supplemental material available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200412001/DC1. Acknowledgments We thank Ruth Steward, George Jackson, Sean Sweeney, and Graeme Davis for sharing reagents. We thank Peter Robin Hiesinger, Hubert Carchon, Eva Beke, and Jason Clements for technical help and discussions. This work was supported by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation and the National Institutes of Health to H.J. Bellen. H.J. Bellen is an Investigator and K.K. Norga was a Physician Postdoctoral Associate of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and is now Senior Clinical Investigator of the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders. B. Dermaut is a Long-term Postdoctoral Fellow of the Human Frontier Science Program. Notes B. Dermaut and K.K. Norga contributed equally to this paper. A. Kania's present address is Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal, Avenue des Pins Ouest 110, Montréal H2W 1R7, Québec, Canada. Abbreviations used in this paper: ACS, anion/cation subfamily; bnch, benchwarmer gene; EJP, excitatory junctional potential; ERG, electroretinogram; LSD, lysosomal storage disorder; MFS, major facilitator superfamily; MVB, multivesicular bodies; NMJ, neuromuscular junction; RP, reserve pool; RRP, readily releasable pool; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; PAS, periodic acid Schiff. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Trends Neurosci. 1995 Nov; 18(11):489-96.
[Trends Neurosci. 1995]Annu Rev Biochem. 1991; 60():257-80.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 1991]Brain Pathol. 1998 Jan; 8(1):175-93.
[Brain Pathol. 1998]Curr Opin Neurol. 2003 Apr; 16(2):121-8.
[Curr Opin Neurol. 2003]Trends Cell Biol. 2003 Mar; 13(3):137-45.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2003]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar; 3(3):237-43.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002]Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003; 26():627-56.
[Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003]Curr Biol. 1997 Nov 1; 7(11):885-8.
[Curr Biol. 1997]J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15; 23(4):1254-64.
[J Neurosci. 2003]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 21(11):3775-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Cell Death Differ. 2003 Jul; 10(7):798-807.
[Cell Death Differ. 2003]Dev Dyn. 2002 Mar; 223(2):298-305.
[Dev Dyn. 2002]Genetics. 1995 Apr; 139(4):1663-78.
[Genetics. 1995]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 21(11):3775-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 21(11):3775-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Dev Dyn. 2002 Mar; 223(2):298-305.
[Dev Dyn. 2002]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Mar; 62(1):1-34.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998]Development. 1999 Oct; 126(20):4477-88.
[Development. 1999]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Science. 2002 Sep 27; 297(5590):2270-5.
[Science. 2002]Dev Dyn. 2002 Mar; 223(2):298-305.
[Dev Dyn. 2002]J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul; 105(1):199-206.
[J Cell Biol. 1987]J Cell Sci. 1995 Dec; 108 ( Pt 12)():3645-7.
[J Cell Sci. 1995]Eur J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb; 63(1):52-60.
[Eur J Cell Biol. 1994]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 21(11):3775-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]J Neurocytol. 1988 Aug; 17(4):499-509.
[J Neurocytol. 1988]J Cell Biol. 1992 Oct; 119(1):123-37.
[J Cell Biol. 1992]J Cell Biol. 1993 Apr; 121(2):305-15.
[J Cell Biol. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11; 92(8):3156-60.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]J Neurosci. 1996 Oct 1; 16(19):6056-64.
[J Neurosci. 1996]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Neuron. 2004 Jul 22; 43(2):193-205.
[Neuron. 2004]J Neurosci. 1992 Feb; 12(2):363-75.
[J Neurosci. 1992]Neuron. 2002 Jul 18; 35(2):333-43.
[Neuron. 2002]J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug; 97(2):499-507.
[J Cell Biol. 1983]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 21(11):3775-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Development. 2000 Feb; 127(4):851-60.
[Development. 2000]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar; 3(3):237-43.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Curr Opin Neurol. 2001 Dec; 14(6):805-10.
[Curr Opin Neurol. 2001]Acta Neuropathol. 1988; 75(5):481-90.
[Acta Neuropathol. 1988]Acta Neuropathol. 1995; 90(6):547-51.
[Acta Neuropathol. 1995]J Comp Neurol. 2001 May 7; 433(3):415-25.
[J Comp Neurol. 2001]J Pathol. 2003 May; 200(1):95-103.
[J Pathol. 2003]Neuron. 2002 May 16; 34(4):509-19.
[Neuron. 2002]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Nat Genet. 1999 Dec; 23(4):462-5.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Mar; 62(1):1-34.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jun; 21(11):3775-88.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):335-8.
[Neuron. 2002]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Acta Neuropathol. 1988; 75(5):481-90.
[Acta Neuropathol. 1988]J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 25; 265(21):12380-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1990]Trends Neurosci. 1995 Nov; 18(11):489-96.
[Trends Neurosci. 1995]Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003; 26():701-28.
[Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]J Neurocytol. 1988 Aug; 17(4):499-509.
[J Neurocytol. 1988]Cell. 2002 Jan 25; 108(2):261-9.
[Cell. 2002]Nat Neurosci. 1998 Sep; 1(5):355-8.
[Nat Neurosci. 1998]Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24():1121-59.
[Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001]Acta Neuropathol. 1988; 75(5):481-90.
[Acta Neuropathol. 1988]Acta Neuropathol. 1995; 90(6):547-51.
[Acta Neuropathol. 1995]Genetics. 1995 Apr; 139(4):1663-78.
[Genetics. 1995]Development. 1999 Oct; 126(20):4477-88.
[Development. 1999]Development. 2000 Feb; 127(4):851-60.
[Development. 2000]Neuron. 2002 Oct 24; 36(3):403-16.
[Neuron. 2002]Genetics. 1996 Dec; 144(4):1673-9.
[Genetics. 1996]Neuron. 2002 May 16; 34(4):509-19.
[Neuron. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16; 100(19):10860-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]J Mol Biol. 2004 May 14; 338(5):1027-36.
[J Mol Biol. 2004]Science. 1971 Jun 4; 172(987):1055-7.
[Science. 1971]J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 19; 23(33):10732-44.
[J Neurosci. 2003]Cell. 2002 Apr 5; 109(1):101-12.
[Cell. 2002]Cell. 2002 Apr 5; 109(1):101-12.
[Cell. 2002]Neuron. 2002 Jul 18; 35(2):333-43.
[Neuron. 2002]Neuron. 2003 Nov 13; 40(4):733-48.
[Neuron. 2003]Neuron. 2004 Jul 22; 43(2):193-205.
[Neuron. 2004]Eur J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb; 63(1):52-60.
[Eur J Cell Biol. 1994]Dev Biol. 1987 Sep; 123(1):264-75.
[Dev Biol. 1987]