![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Kubica et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. A Potential New Pathway for Staphylococcus aureus Dissemination: The Silent Survival of S. aureus Phagocytosed by Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages 1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 2Department of Immunology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 3Department of Cell Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 4Center for Electron Microscopy of the Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany 5Department of Cell Ultrastructure, Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland 6School of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany 7Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America 8Department of Microbiology, Moyne Institute of Preventive Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland Robin May, Academic Editor University of Birmingham, United Kingdom #Contributed equally. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: staphaureus/at/gmail.com (MK); Email: kaniajoanna/at/gmail.com (JK) Conceived and designed the experiments: MK KG JK. Performed the experiments: MK JK MZ AG AM. Analyzed the data: MK JK WR BG KB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JP MK MZ KB. Wrote the paper: JP TF MK JK LS. Received September 9, 2007; Accepted December 10, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Although considered to be an extracellular pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus is able to invade a variety of mammalian, non-professional phagocytes and can also survive engulfment by professional phagocytes such as neutrophils and monocytes. In both of these cell types S. aureus promptly escapes from the endosomes/phagosomes and proliferates within the cytoplasm, which quickly leads to host cell death. In this report we show that S. aureus interacted with human monocyte-derived macrophages in a very different way to those of other mammalian cells. Upon phagocytosis by macrophages, S. aureus persisted intracellularly in vacuoles for 3–4 days before escaping into the cytoplasm and causing host cell lysis. Until the point of host cell lysis the infected macrophages showed no signs of apoptosis or necrosis and were functional. They were able to eliminate intracellular staphylococci if prestimulated with interferon-γ at concentrations equivalent to human therapeutic doses. S. aureus survival was dependent on the alternative sigma factor B as well as the global regulator agr, but not SarA. Furthermore, isogenic mutants deficient in α-toxin, the metalloprotease aureolysin, protein A, and sortase A were efficiently killed by macrophages upon phagocytosis, although with different kinetics. In particular α-toxin was a key effector molecule that was essential for S. aureus intracellular survival in macrophages. Together, our data indicate that the ability of S. aureus to survive phagocytosis by macrophages is determined by multiple virulence factors in a way that differs considerably from its interactions with other cell types. S. aureus persists inside macrophages for several days without affecting the viability of these mobile cells which may serve as vehicles for the dissemination of infection. Introduction S. aureus is a leading etiologic agent of nosocomial and community-acquired infectious diseases. The pathogenesis of staphylococcal disease usually proceeds from a local infection (e.g., wound infection, furuncle and cellulitis) to systemic dissemination (bacteremia) and then to metastatic infections (e.g., endocarditis, osteomyelitis and septic arthritis). Toxinoses (e.g., toxin shock syndrome, scaled skin syndrome, and food-borne gastroenteritis) constitute a separate group of staphylococcal diseases resulting from the local or systemic effects of specific toxins [1], [2]. The public health concern regarding staphylococcal infections is magnified by the increasing prevalence of multiply antibiotic resistant strains such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and glycopeptide-insensitive S. aureus (GISA) [3]. The appearance of vancomycin-resistant strains (VRSA) suggests the possibility of a return to a pre-antibiotic era where 80% of bloodstream infections were fatal. A comprehensive understanding of the pathogenic pathways exerted by S. aureus is urgently needed to aid the design of new therapeutic and preventive treatments. The success of S. aureus as a pathogen is primarily due to its ability to produce a large number of virulence factors. These include several MSCRAMMs (microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules) that bind fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, collagen, vitronectin, and thrombospondin to promote colonization [4]. Host defenses are thwarted by the production of microcapsule, protein A, coagulase, complement inhibitors, fatty acid-metabolizing enzymes and leukocidin while proteases, nucleases, lipases, hyaluronate lyase and staphylokinase facilitate tissue invasion [5]. Secreted toxins (e.g. toxin shock syndrome toxin, enterotoxins and exfoliative toxins) elicit sepsis and/or induce specific toxinoses. Nevertheless, despite the recognition of this plethora of virulence factors, we are still far from identifying exactly which ones are necessary for infection and which ones may be targeted by new therapies [6]. S. aureus can modulate the transcriptional activity of virulence genes in response to environmental changes controlled by global regulatory elements that are of two major types; two-component regulatory systems and the SarA family of DNA binding-proteins [7]. A major two-component regulatory system is encoded by the agr locus which controls the expression of many virulence factors including proteases, MSCRAMMs and toxins in a growth phase and density-dependent manner [8]. The synthesis of many cell-wall associated proteins is stimulated during the initial stages of growth but is repressed post-exponentially. In contrast, the expression of extracellular proteins, including toxins and proteases, is activated during the post-exponential growth phase converting bacteria from adherent to invasive. Several other regulatory loci control the expression of virulence factors by modulating agr expression, including the alternative Sigma factor B (σB) [9], [10]. Such a multi-leveled regulatory system enables S. aureus to express virulence factors under varying conditions, which is of clinical significance since mutants of regulatory loci have severely impaired virulence [11]–[13]. Although S. aureus is considered to be an extracellular, pyogenic pathogen, an emerging body of evidence indicates that intracellular reservoirs of S. aureus may contribute to persistence such as occurs in recurrent staphylococcal rhinosinusitis and to relapses of infection after antimicrobial therapy [2], [14]. Recent in vitro studies have revealed that S. aureus can invade a variety of non-professional phagocytic cells, including keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial and epithelial cells, enterocytes and osteoblasts [15]–[21]. Bacterial uptake is promoted by fibronectin which acts as a bridging molecule between integrin α5β1 on the cell surface and the S. aureus fibronectin-binding proteins [16], [19], [22], [23]. This activates the Src family of protein-tyrosine kinases and stimulates internalization of adherent bacterium by the ‘zipper mechanism’ [24], [25], [26]. Internalized bacteria reside in endosomal vacuoles or are diverted from the endosomal pathway to autophagosomes depending on the cell type invaded and/or the S. aureus strain [27]. Subsequently, S. aureus escapes into the cytoplasm where it eventually kills the host cell through the induction of apoptosis [15], [18], [20], [28], [29]. Although secretion of α-toxin by internalized bacteria has been shown to kill host cells [18], [30] it is becoming increasingly apparent that other signals from internalized, metabolically active staphylococci are required to induce apoptosis and that this process requires multiple virulence factors [29], [31]–[33]. Professional phagocytes such as neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells are designed to actively engulf microbes and kill them. Only a few types of microbial pathogen can survive phagocytosis by neutrophils and macrophages and they do so by using a several distinct mechanisms to avoid destruction in phagolysosomes [34], [35]. Surprisingly, S. aureus also appears to be resistant to bactericidal attack inside the phagocytic vacuoles of neutrophils which can contain viable intracellular bacteria when isolated from sites of infection [36]–[38]. Recent in vitro studies confirmed the high level of resistance of S. aureus to killing by neutrophils [39]. Furthermore neutrophils can create an environment in vivo that promotes intracellular growth of S. aureus and contributes to dissemination during infection [40]. Neutrophils, however, are unlikely cells to carry bacteria from the focus of infection into the circulation since they are short-lived [41]. Macrophages are far better suited to this purpose because they are long lived and mobile cells that take phagocytosed material to the lymphoid tissue [42], [43]. If carrying live S. aureus macrophages may contribute to the ability of the organism to invade the vascular system from localized infection sites [44]. However, very little is known about the interaction of S. aureus with macrophages. S. aureus is able to survive in mice and rat macrophages [45]–[48]. In addition, Elliott et al. [49] have demonstrated short-term survival of S. aureus inside human alveolar macrophages. However, none of these investigations have addressed specifically which bacterial factors are important for intracellular persistence. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term ability of S. aureus to survive uptake by human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs). We found that significant numbers of S. aureus cells which had avoided killing during the first 4–5 days post-phagocytosis were suddenly able to lyse the macrophages in which no signs of apoptosis or necrosis were previously demonstrated. Furthermore these newly escaped S. aureus cells were then able to proliferate abundantly in the conditioned media. Bacterial survival and escape from phagocytes was dependent not only on α-hemolysin, but also on functional agr and σB loci, as well as on the expression of sortase A and the metalloprotease, aureolysin. Thus S. aureus survived inside macrophages in a metabolically active form until the intracellular environment become suitable for escape. Our findings suggest that the ability of S. aureus to survive phagocytosis by human macrophages may contribute to dissemination of the infection and may be detrimental to the host. Results Infection of macrophages by S. aureus does not damage adherent phagocytes Previous reports have shown that hMDMs and murine macrophages that have ingested virulent bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Shigella flexnerii, Burkholderia pseudomallei, Yersinia ssp., Salmonella typhimurium, die by cytolytic processes that involve cell swelling, plasma membrane disintegration and karyolysis or by apoptosis [50]–[55]. Contrary to this we have found that the phagocytosis of opsonised S. aureus strain Newman by hMDMs in ratios bacteria to macrophages of up to 50:1 (multiplicity of infection, MOI = 50), led to a prolonged, survival of bacteria in phagocytes (see below) that did not affect the viability of the host cells. Indeed hMDMs maintained an intact plasma membrane up to 5 days post-phagocytosis as discerned by a lack of staining with propidium iodide (Fig. 1A
The integrity of the plasma membrane of hMDMs infected with different MOIs of S. aureus was shown by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released into the culture media at 2 h and 24 h post-phagocytosis. As shown in Fig. 1D = 25 and 50. The loss of cells was higher at MOI = 100, correlating well with the recorded cytotoxicity (Fig. 1DThe bactericidal functions of infected macrophages are preserved That the metabolic activity of the infected macrophages was maintained suggested that the bactericidal functions of these cells was also undisturbed. In order to verify this assertion we compared the respiratory burst response of control and infected hMDMs after the phagocytosis of latex beads and live bacteria. As shown in Fig. 2
S. aureus persists inside macrophages until the cells lyse Cultured hMDMs engulfed S. aureus strain Newman efficiently, with the majority of bacteria being internalized by 2 h. To determine the intracellular survival/killing rate of S. aureus cells the infected hMDMs were lysed at specific time points post-phagocytosis and plated onto TSA. The intracellular survival of S. aureus was dependent on the MOI. At MOI = 5 or 10 all of the intracellular bacteria were killed by 3 days postphagocytosis (data not shown). Conversely, at MOI = 25 the number of viable intracellular staphylococci decreased gradually between day 1 and day 5 by approximately five orders of magnitude compared to day 0 (Fig. 3A
A burst of live S. aureus in the conditioned media may indicate that the bacteria either suddenly proliferated intracellularly, with large numbers of bacterial cells being released into the media after hMDM lysis, or that a small number of surviving intracellular bacteria escaped intracellular confinement and multiplied vigorously in the media, killing the hMDMs in the process. To discern between these two vastly different possibilities we have simultaneously monitored live bacteria in media, and also cell membrane damage. In four independent experiments we found that proliferation of S. aureus in the conditioned medium clearly preceded any significant cell damage as measured by the release of LDH (Fig. 3B Experiments monitoring the survival of S. aureus strain Newman inside hMDMs were repeated a total of 76 times with cells obtained from a number of different donors. Despite some minor variations in CFU on individual days we found a consistently high level of phagocytosis, a reproducible decrease in cultivable bacteria 4–5 days post-phagocytosis, and the sudden growth of S. aureus on day 5–6 which occurred simultaneously with, or proceeding, macrophages lysis. An occasional deviation from the pattern shown in Fig. 3A Analysis of the data in Fig. 3A Priming macrophages with interferon-γ helps the cells eradicate intracellular S. aureus Interferon-γ (IFNγ) plays an essential role in stimulating cells to eliminate intracellular pathogens [57]. Therefore we checked the effect of IFNγ on the course of hMDMs infection with three different S. aureus strains. As can be clearly seen in Fig. 4
S. aureus persists in intracellular vacuoles The strategies employed by obligate intracellular pathogens to avoid intracellular killing by professional phagocytes can be broadly categorized as immediate escape from the phagosome into the cytoplasm or modification of the phagosome preventing it from fusing with lysosomes [58], [59]. In order to investigate the intracellular localization of staphylococci we have analyzed hMDMs infected with S. aureus strain Newman by transmission electron microscopy. Macrophages engulfed the bacteria by forming phagocytic cups (Fig. 5B
Intracellular survival of S. aureus depends on functional agr and sigB loci, but not on sarA The intracellular survival of S. aureus in neutrophils, as well as in non-professional phagocytes, depends on multiple virulence factors, including global regulators of gene expression [32], [40]. Therefore we compared the uptake and intracellular killing/survival of S. aureus strains deficient in agr, sarA or sigB. First we examined the survival of S. aureus strain 8325-4 in which an 11bp deletion in the rsbU gene renders the sigB operon essentially non-functional [60]. Macrophages cleared intracellular 8325-4 within two days, apparently by killing the bacteria in phagolysosome (Fig. 6A
The significance of agr and sarA was studied using isogenic mutants of S. aureus Newman. The inactivation of agr eliminated the ability of S. aureus to survive within hMDMs. By the second day of infection no viable bacteria were apparent in cell lysates, indicating that the engulfed S. aureus had been completely destroyed (Fig. 6D Expression of α-toxin, MSCRAMMs, and aureolysin, but not other proteases, contributes to S. aureus persistence in macrophages SarA and agr differentially regulate the expression of virulence factors, especially surface-associated proteins (MSCRAMMs) and secreted enzymes [8]. In addition, it has previously been established that α-hemolysin is vital for the escape of S. aureus from phagosomes into the cytoplasm of infected, non-professional phagocytes [15], [62]. Therefore we examined the effects of inactivation of hla (Fig. 7
In comparison to the wild-type, which persisted intracellularly for 5 days before lysing macrophages, hla-deficient mutant was eradicated by day 2 (Fig. 7 Of the three major extracellular proteases only aureolysin was shown to have a role in the survival of S. aureus inside macrophages (Fig. 8A Discussion In this study we detail findings that confirm previous observations that S. aureus can survive phagocytosis by macrophages [45], [47], [49]. Most importantly, however, our data shows for the first time that this bacterium can not only persist for several days inside macrophages, but ultimately is able to escape the intracellular confinement and proliferate rapidly in the conditioned media. Throughout the course of intracellular infection with each S. aureus strain tested (Newman, COL, and SH1000) macrophages showed no signs of necrosis until the day of lysis. In the case of strain Newman, the plasma membrane of infected macrophages maintained their integrity for up to 5 days with mitochondria remaining functional and cells actively metabolizing lipids (Fig. 1 The kinetics of intracellular killing of bacteria, and the timing of the escape of internalized S. aureus into the conditioned medium were consistent and reproducible for a given staphylococcal strain, despite the fact that macrophages were derived from many different donors. The occasional deviations from typical patterns of intracellular survival and cell lysis (Fig. 3A By examining TEM micrographs of infected macrophages several important observations were made. First, S. aureus was engulfed by the formation of typical phagocytic cups (Fig. 5B In comparison to well studied intracellular pathogens such as Shigella flexneri, Chlamydia spp., Mycobacterium spp., Legionella pneumophila, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and Brucella abortus we know little about how S. aureus can survive phagocytosis. Recently, it has been shown that the subversion of autophagy by S. aureus internalized by HeLa cells and fibroblasts can be central to intracellular endurance in non-professional phagocytes [27]. However, in the case of macrophages, we have neither observed in our TEM micrographs multilamellar structures attached to, or fused with the membranes of S. aureus vacuoles, nor double membranes enveloping the bacteria which are the main morphological criteria for autophagosomes. Conversely, S. aureus was consistently found inside well defined single-membrane vacuoles. Intracellular persistence of S. aureus in non-professional phagocytes depends on the expression of the global regulatory locus agr, and on the alternative sigma factor, sigB, but not on sarA [32]. In contrast to our findings with macrophages it has previously been demonstrated that sarA is required for the survival of staphylococci upon phagocytosis by neutrophils [40]. SarA was not only dispensable for intracellular persistence in human macrophages, but the sarA mutant survived inside phagocytes with higher numbers of viable cells and initiated proliferation at least one day prior to that of the parental strain (Fig. 6 In contrast to the sarA mutant, strains lacking SigB were efficiently killed with bacteria being totally eradicated within 48 h. The importance of SigB was emphasized when comparing 8325-4, which contains a natural mutation in the rsbU locus that renders sigB essentially non-functional, and its derivative SH1000, which has restored SigB function. Strain 8325-4 was unable to survive engulfment by macrophages whereas SH1000 was the most aggressive of all S. aureus strains tested in surviving this challenge. It is not yet possible to identify which factors controlled by SigB are vital for S. aureus survival since it is a pleiotropic regulator that modulates the expression of large numbers of genes, including those encoding virulence factors and proteins involved in the environmental stress response [71], [72]. Strains defective in sigB lack the golden pigmentation that is characteristic of S. aureus, which has been shown to be essential in protecting S. aureus against reactive oxygen species [73]. It is possible that lack of pigment may be directly responsible for the efficient killing of strain 8325-4 and the Newman sigB mutant. The agr locus has previously been shown to be absolutely essential for the intracellular survival of S. aureus in a variety of different cell types by facilitating the escape of bacteria from the endosome into the cytoplasm [32], [33], [74]. Here we show that it is indispensable for survival in macrophages. Although at least 100 genes are differentially regulated by agr [75], it's most significant impact on intracellular survival may be via the regulated expression of α-toxin. However, while S. aureus, with the help of α-toxin, escapes endosomes within hours of engulfment by non-professional phagocytes, it persists in membranous compartments in macrophages for up to 5 days. This suggests that hla expression by S. aureus inside macrophages may be regulated differentially compared to other cell types where significant amounts of toxin are produced immediately following invasion facilitating the prompt escape of bacteria into the cytoplasm and eventually triggering cell death by activation of caspase-dependent or independent apoptosis [30], [76]–[78]. α-toxin may work at two different stages by first facilitating disintegration of the vacuolar membranes that confine S. aureus and second by lysing the plasma membrane and facilitating escape from the cytoplasm into the conditioned medium. The effective eradication of the S. aureus hla mutant before any visible damage to the phagosomal membrane argues that lysing both vacuolar and cytoplasmic membranes is a major role of this toxin. The metalloprotease aureolysin, the V8 serine protease (SspA) and staphopain B (SspB), are each produced in vivo following phagocytosis by human neutrophils [77] but only the first contributed to the survival of S. aureus in macrophages. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that SspA and SspB have an effect on S. aureus survival because they are activated in a cascade-like manner, initiated by aureolysin [79]. In the absence of the metalloprotease, SspA and SspB occur as proteolytically-inactive zymogens. Possibly the proteases retard endosome maturation by cleaving one or more host protein. Alternatively, they may target proteins regulating the antibacterial response of macrophages. Both these possibilities are the focus of ongoing research in our laboratories. Finally, the anchoring of MSCRAMMs to the cell wall also contributes to S. aureus survival and/or escape from intracellular confinement as the sortase A-deficient mutant of strain Newman was efficiently killed by macrophages. The observation that the S. aureus protein A deficient strain was attenuated in intracellular persistence to the same degree as the srtA mutant, suggests the importance of protein A in surviving confrontations with macrophages. This is in agreement with the known importance of protein A for S. aureus virulence [80]. Additional surface protein(s) may also contribute to survival, but the fact that Newman is defective in its net fibronectin binding capacity due to point mutations in the two major fibronectin-binding genes (fnbA and fnbB) [81], argues against the importance of these adhesins in the process of intracellular persistence of S. aureus in macrophages. In summary, it is evident that the mechanism for survival of S. aureus inside macrophages differs considerably from its interactions with other cells types. S. aureus preserves the integrity of the macrophage, using it as an intracellular niche, rather than destroying it. Nothing is yet known about how macrophages affect transcriptional regulation of intracellular S. aureus or why bacteria do not quickly escape from phagosomes as they do from other cells. However from the data presented here, it is clear that intracellular S. aureus can survive within human macrophages for several days until a point where bacteria escaped the intracellular confinement, proliferated in the conditioned medium and killed cells. In comparison to the more stealthy strategy of conversion to small colony variants, which allows for survival for months or even years [82], it would appear that hiding within macrophages is a short-term solution. Nevertheless, it may provide S. aureus with an advantage since, as is the case for L. monocytogenes and M. tuberculosis, infected mobile macrophages can serve as vehicles for the dissemination of infection [83]–[85]. This would explain the ability of S. aureus to invade the circulation from localized sites of infection and to disseminate systemically. Materials and Methods Reagents Acridine orange, propidium iodide, ethidium bromide, Bodipy 493/503 were from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen). FCS (Fetal Calf Serum), gentamycin, erythromycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, sodium cacodylate trihydrate, RNase A, proteinase K, bovine serum albumin (BSA), saponin, recombinant human interferon γ (IFNγ), tryptic soy agar (TSA), tryptic soy broth (TSB), lysostaphin and agarose were obtained from Sigma. RPMI 1640 and CMF-PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) and Ficoll-Paque were obtained from Gibco and Amersham Bioscience, respectively. LDH Kit was obtained from Promega. Genomic DNA Prep Plus Kit was purchased from A&A Biotechnology and Taq recombinant polymerase was obtained from MBI Fermentas. Cell culture hMDMs were obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Briefly, PBMCs were isolated from human blood using a Ficoll-Paque density gradient and plated at 3×106/well in 24-well plates (Sarstedt) in RPMI1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 µg ml−1 gentamycin (Sigma), and 10% autological human serum. After 24 h, non-adherent PBMCs were removed by washing with complete medium, and adherent cells were routinely cultured in this medium for 7 days with fresh medium changed every 2 days [86]. For some experiments hMDMs were cultured for 14 days. Bacterial strains, storage and growth conditions The laboratory S. aureus strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. The strains were stored in TSB medium containing glycerol (50% v/v) at −80°C. Cultures were inoculated from stocks into 10 ml media. S. aureus strains were grown overnight under constant rotation (180 rpm) to stationary growth phase at 37°C. If required, media were supplemented with antibiotics at the following concentration: erythromycin at 5 µg ml−1 or 10 µg ml−1; tetracycline at 2 µg ml−1. The bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation (5,000×g, 8 min), washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in PBS to the desired OD600nm. For some experiments, staphylococci were opsonized by incubation at 37°C for 30 min in heat inactivated FCS, washed and resuspended in PBS. Accuracy of preparation of bacterial samples for phagocytosis assay was routinely verified by plating dilutions on agar plates and counting colonies to determine CFU per ml. Occasionally, viability of staphylococci used to incubate with hMDMs was evaluated using a LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™ bacterial viability kit from Molecular Probes and found >90% viable.
Phagocytosis assay and samples preparations A suspension of S. aureus in PBS was added to 3×105 hMDMs cultured in RPMI1640 medium containing L-glutamine and 10% heat inactivated human autologous serum in the 24-well culture plate to the final amount of 1.5×106 CFU, 3×106 CFU, 7.5×106 CFU, 1.5×107 CFU, and 3×107 CFU (the ratio bacteria : hMDM = from 5 1 to 100 1, multiplicity of infection, MOI = 5, 10, 25, 50 and 10, respectively). hMDMs and staphylococci were co-cultured for 2h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Phagocytosis was stopped by putting the plates on ice and washing the hMDMs cultures twice with ice-cold PBS to remove non-phagocytosed bacteria. Any remaining extracellular bacteria were killed by overnight culturing hMDMs in RPMI1640 medium containing gentamycin (50 µg ml−1). Then, the medium was changed again to fresh media without antibiotic and the cultures were maintained for up to 8 days with medium changes every second day.Initial samples for determination of colony-forming ability of S. aureus present in culture medium and internalized by macrophages, as well as samples for microscopic examinations, PCR analysis, and hMDMs viability assessment were all taken immediately after cells were washed out of free non-phagocytosed bacteria, before medium was supplemented with gentamycin. Consecutive samples were taken every 24h for up to 8 days or until S. aureus escaped into the conditioned medium and cells were lysed as evaluated by light microscopical inspection. All samples were prepared in triplicates. Since the opsonization of S. aureus with heat-inactivated serum (inactive complement) prior to bacterial co-culturing with macrophages did not affect the rate of phagocytosis (data not show) we assumed that the presence of serum in the culture medium during phagocytosis yielded enough opsonins to facilitate the efficient phagocytic uptake of S. aureus by macrophages. Therefore all experiments described in this paper were performed without prior opsonization. IFN γ treatment hMDMs were preincubated overnight with 100 U/ml interferon γ (activated hMDMs). Then, the cells were exposed to S. aureus (Newman, ATCC 25923 or COL strain) at MOI 25. Simultaneously, the non-stimulated cells were incubated with the same S. aureus strain and regarded as a control. After 2 hours of phagocytosis, extracellular bacteria were killed by adding the gentamycin to the culture medium and the cultures were continued as described above. Directly after phagocytosis and at consecutive days post-phagocytosis, intracellular bacteria released by cell lysis were analyzed for colony forming ability. Assay for colony-forming ability of engulfed bacteria PBS-washed hMDMs directly after 2h incubation with S. aureus and infected cell cultures at consecutive days post-phagocytosis were lysed by treatment with ice-cold water. The lysates were plated at serial dilutions in sterile PBS on TSB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight or for 2 days and the number of colonies (CFU) was enumerated. In parallel, the presence of viable staphylococci in the conditioned media was also determined by the colony-forming assay. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) measurement-Cytotoxicity Assays To assess the effect of S. aureus on cell necrosis, the LDH release assay was performed using the CytoTox96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cytotoxicity was calculated with the formula: % cytotoxicity = (experimental value−low control)×100/(high control–low control), where low control is assay medium plus cells and high control is assay medium (plus 2% Triton X-100) plus cells to define the maximum LDH release. The spontaneous release was always up to 10% of the maximum release. Relative amounts of LDH release was measured (absorbance at 490 nm) using an ELISA plate reader. All assays were performed in triplicate.MTT Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay To quantify mitochondrial activity of infected hMDMs the MTT tetrazolium dye reduction assay was applied. Cultures of control and S. aureus infected hMDMs at different times post-phagocytosis were incubated with the MTT (monotetrazolium) reagent (Sigma) for 3 h at 37°C. Then, a detergent solution was added to lyse the cells and solubilize crystals of formazan produced by mitochondria. The samples were read using an ELISA plate reader at a wavelength of 570 nm. The amount of color produced was directly proportional to the number of viable cells. All assays were performed in triplicate. Respiratory burst assay Control hMDMs, and S. aureus-infected cells on 4th day post-phagocytosis, were washed twice with PBS and scraped into TBS buffer. Cell suspensions (0.5×106 in 0.6 ml of TBS) were incubated at 37°C for 5 min with 10 µM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) obtained from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Leiden, The Netherlands). Next, live S. aureus (107 CFU) or latex beads (1.7–2.2 µm, Sphero Nile Red BD Bisciences Pharmingen) were added to macrophage suspensions. At differing time intervals aliquots were withdrawn and subjected to flow cytometric analysis. The fluorescence and light-scattering properties of cells was determined using FACScan Cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The green fluorescence of DCF was observed using wavelengths of 521 nm (emission), and 488 nm (excitation). The mean fluorescence intensity of cells was quantitatively analyzed. Fluorescence staining and confocal microscopy hMDMs cultured on glass coverslips were placed into 6 well plates. Both, control and infected with S. aureus (Newman strain) cells were fixed for 30 min at room temperature with 8% paraformaldehyde in 200 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, then washed with CMF-PBS. The fixed cells were treated with RNase A at 4°C, overnight. After incubation with RNase, 10 µg ml−1 acridine orange (AO) was added to the samples. Green fluorescence corresponds to nucleic acids of host cell DNA as well as to nucleic acids of bacteria. Cells were examined using the Bio-Rad MRC1024 confocal system, interfaced with a Nikon Diaphot (Nikon, Amsterdam) inverted microscope equipped with argon and krypton-argon lasers, 3 detection channels and a Nikon PlanApo 60x oil immersion lens. Images were taken in the line-averaging mode and at a pinhole setting of one Airy unit. Every fluorescence image shown is an extended focus calculated as the zero-projection from stacks of single images taken at an interval of 0.2 µm. Image resolution was 512×512 pixels. AO interacts with DNA and RNA, having green fluorescence with an emission maximum at 525 nm when bound to DNA; upon association with RNA, its emission is shifted to ~650 nm (red luminescence). Also, the cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) at a final concentration 5 µg ml−1. Propidium binds to DNA and RNA, having red fluorescence with an emission maximum at 620 nm. The cells were also stained with BODIPY493/503 at final concentration 5 µM. The BODIPY fluorophore is specific for neutral, cytoplasmic lipids and used as tracer for lipid droplets and nonpolar liquids. Images were recorded using a LSM 510 Meta confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with helium-neon and argon lasers. To distinguish vivid bacteria with intact cell walls from dead bacteria with compromised membranes, the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability kit was used. The kit provides two different nucleic acid stains-SYTO 9 and propidium iodide, which, mixed in proper ratios, give fluorescence signals indicative of alive or dead bacteria. Cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 to allow PI to bind to the dead bacteria and macrophage DNA (Fig. 3D Transmission electron microscopy Infected or non-infected adherent hMDMs cultured on 6-well plates, were trypsinized with 10% trypsin-EDTA (Sigma). After 10 minutes at 37°C, the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and pelleted at 4°C. The cells were then fixed with Karnovsky solution (2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, 30 min at room temperature, washed in the same buffer lacking the fixative and post-fixed in 2% osmium tetraoxide for 1h [87]. The pellets were dehydrated through serial incubation in graded series of ethanol solutions (30%, 60%, 90%, and 100%) and finally embedded in Epon. The sections were counter-stained with uranyl acetate, lead citrate and examined with a Zeiss electron microscope. MLVF (Multiple-locus VNTR fingerprinting) and PCR analysis Total DNA of the isolates for PCR and MLVF typing were performed as described by Sabat et al. [56]. For DNA extraction, cell lysates were resuspended in 100 µl of lysis buffer (6 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 M NaCl, 0.1 M Na2EDTA, 0.5% Brij 58, 1% N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt). Lysostaphin and RNase A were then added to concentrations of 50 µg ml−1 and 60 µg ml−1, respectively, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. A Genomic DNA Prep Plus kit used according to the manufacturer's instructions was applied to purify total DNA. The purified DNA was diluted 1 10 with sterile water and stored at −20°C until required. PCR primers are listed in Table 2. The primers were designed based on the completed and unfinished S. aureus genomes available from The Institute for Genomic Research (http://www.tigr.org) (COL strain), the University of Oklahoma (http://www.genome.ou.edu) (strain 8325), the Sanger Institute (http://www.sanger.ac.uk) (strains MRSA252 and MSSA476), and Juntendo University (http://www.juntendo.ac.jp) (strains Mu50 and N315). Multiplex amplifications were performed in mixtures containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs and 0.05 U of Taq recombinant polymerase per µl. The final reaction volume of 20 µl contained 0.5 µM each of clfB-F and clfB-R, 1 µM each of clfA-F, clfA-R, sdrCDE-F, sdrCDE-R, spa-F, spa-R, sspA-F and sspA-R as well as 1 µl template DNA. The amplification of DNA fragments was performed with an initial denaturation (94°C, 5 min), followed by 20 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 30 sec), annealing (55°C, 30 sec) and extension (72°C, 30 sec) with a single final extension step (72°C, 5 min). The amplified products were separated using a 2% TAE agarose gel (Sigma) and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. The amplification of 16S rRNA fragments was run: a denaturation step at 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 60 sec at 45°C, 10 sec at 72°C, with a final extension at 72°C for 3 minutes.
Acknowledgments We thank the anonymous blood donors for making this study possible. We are also indebted to Dr. Jerzy Doliwa-Dobrucki (Division of Cell Biophysics, Jagiellonian University) for his invaluable help with confocal microscopy, fruitful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. Footnotes Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Funding: This work was supported by the Commission of the European Communities, specific RTD program "Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources", Project QLRT-2001-01250 "Novel non-antibiotic treatment of staphylococcal diseases", grants from the State Committee for Scientific Research (MNiSW, Warsaw, Poland) (KBN 6PO4A 060 19; 2P04A 049 28; 2PO4A 011 26 , 6PO4A 011 27 to KG, JK, MZ and MK respectively) and the European Molecular Biology Organization for a research fellowship (ASTF 103-05) awarded to MK. JP is a recipient of a Subsydium Profesorskie awarded by the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP, Warsaw, Poland). TJF would like to acknowledge support from Science Foundation Ireland, the Health Research Board and The Wellcome Trust. References 1. Archer GL. Staphylococcus aureus: A well-armed pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1179–1181. [PubMed] 2. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. New Engl J Med. 1998;339:520–532. [PubMed] 3. Zetola N, Francis JS, Nuermberger EL, Bishai WR. Community-acquired meticillin-resistant: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:275–286. [PubMed] 4. Foster TJ, Hook M. Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6:484–488. [PubMed] 5. Foster TJ. Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:948–958. [PubMed] 6. Lindsay JA, Holden MT. Staphylococcus aureus: superbug, super genome? Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:378–385. [PubMed] 7. Cheung AL, Bayer AS, Zhang G, Gresham H, Xiong YQ. Regulation of virulence determinants in vitro and in vivo in Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004;40:1–9. [PubMed] 8. Novick RP. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:1429–1449. [PubMed] 9. Bischoff M, Entenza JM, Giachino P. Influence of a functional sigB operon on the global regulators sar and agr in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:5171–5179. [PubMed] 10. Bronner S, Monteil H, Prevost G. Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus: complexity and applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;28:183–200. [PubMed] 11. Abdelnour A, Arvidson S, Bremell T, Ryden C, Tarkowski A. The accessory gene regulator (agr) controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in a murine arthritis model. Infect Immun. 1993;61:3879–3885. [PubMed] 12. Booth MC, Cheung AL, Hatter KL, Jett BD, Callegan MC, et al. Staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) in conjunction with agr contributes to Staphylococcus aureus virulence in endophthalmitis. Infect Immun. 1997;65:1550–1556. [PubMed] 13. Cheung AL, Eberhardt KJ, Chung E, Yeaman MR, Sullam PM, et al. Diminished virulence of a sar-/agr- mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in the rabbit model of endocarditis. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1815–1822. [PubMed] 14. Clement S, Vaudaux P, Francois P, Schrenzel J, Huggler E, et al. Evidence of an intracellular reservoir in the nasal mucosa of patients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus rhinosinusitis. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1023–1028. [PubMed] 15. Bayles KW, Wesson CA, Liou LE, Fox LK, Bohach GA, et al. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus escapes the endosome and induces apoptosis in epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1998;66:336–342. [PubMed] 16. Fowler T, Wann ER, Joh D, Johansson S, Foster TJ, et al. Cellular invasion by Staphylococcus aureus involves a fibronectin bridge between the bacterial fibronectin-binding MSCRAMMs and host cell beta-1-integrins. Eur J Cell Biol. 2000;79:672–679. [PubMed] 17. Hess DJ, Henry-Stanley MJ, Erickson EA, Wells CL. Intracellular survival of Staphylococcus aureus within cultured enterocytes. J Surg Res. 2003;114:42–49. [PubMed] 18. Menzies BE, Kourteva I. Internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by endothelial cells induces apoptosis. Infect Immun. 1998;66:5994–5998. [PubMed] 19. Nair SP, Bischoff M, Senn MM, Berger-Bachi B. The sigma B regulon influences internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by osteoblasts. Infect Immun. 2003;71:4167–4170. [PubMed] 20. Nuzzo I, Sanges MR, Folgore A, Carratelli CR. Apoptosis of human keratinocytes after bacterial invasion. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000;27:235–240. [PubMed] 21. Peacock SJ, Foster TJ, Cameron BJ, Berendt AR. Bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins and endothelial cell surface fibronectin mediate adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to resting human endothelial cells. Microbiology. 1999;145:3477–3486. [PubMed] 22. Dziewanowska K, Patti JM, Deobald CF, Bayles KW, Trumble WR, et al. Fibronectin binding protein and host cell tyrosine kinase are required for internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999;67:4673–4678. [PubMed] 23. Sinha B, Francois PP, Nusse O, Foti M, Hartford OM, et al. Fibronectin-binding protein acts as Staphylococcus aureus invasin via fibronectin bridging to integrin alpha5beta1. Cell Microbiol. 1999;1:101–117. [PubMed] 24. Agerer F, Lux S, Michel A, Rohde M, Ohlsen K, et al. Cellular invasion by Staphylococcus aureus reveals a functional link between focal adhesion kinase and cortactin in integrin-mediated internalisation. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2189–200. [PubMed] 25. Fowler T, Johansson S, Wary KK, Hook M. Src kinase has a central role in in vitro cellular internalization of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5:417–426. [PubMed] 26. Lowy FD, Fant J, Higgins LL, Ogawa SK, Hatcher VB. Staphylococcus aureus-human endothelial cell interactions. J Ultrastruct Mol Struct Res. 1988;98:137–146. [PubMed] 27. Schnaith A, Kashkar H, Leggio SA, Addicks K, Kronke M, et al. Staphylococcus aureus subvert autophagy for induction of caspase-independent host cell death. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:2695–2706. [PubMed] 28. Jones D, Walev I, Berger T, Liebetrau M, Palmer M, et al. Novel path to apoptosis: small transmembrane pores created by staphylococcal alpha-toxin in T lymphocytes evoke internucleosomal DNA degradation. Infect Immun. 1994;62:1304–1312. [PubMed] 29. de Silva MC, Zahm JM, Gras D, Bajolet O, Abely M, et al. Dynamic interaction between airway epithelial cells and Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;287:L543–L551. [PubMed] 30. Haslinger B, Strangfeld K, Peters G, Schulze-Osthoff K, Sinha B. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin induces apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: role of endogenous tumour necrosis factor-alpha and the mitochondrial death pathway. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5:729–741. [PubMed] 31. Esen M, Schreiner B, Jendrossek V, Lang F, Fassbender K, et al. Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus induced apoptosis of human endothelial cells. Apoptosis. 2001;6:431–439. [PubMed] 32. Haslinger-Loffler B, Kahl BC, Grundmeier M, Strangfeld K, Wagner B, et al. Multiple virulence factors are required for Staphylococcus aureus-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1087–1097. [PubMed] 33. Wesson CA, Liou LE, Todd KM, Bohach GA, Trumble WR, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Agr and Sar global regulators influence internalization and induction of apoptosis. Infect Immun. 1998;66:5238–5243. [PubMed] 34. Amer AO, Swanson MS. A phagosome of one's own: a microbial guide to life in the macrophage. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5:56–61. [PubMed] 35. Staali L, Bauer S, Morgelin M, Bjorck L, Tapper H. Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria modulate membrane traffic in human neutrophils and selectively inhibit azurophilic granule fusion with phagosomes. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:690–703. [PubMed] 36. Kapral F, Shayegani F. Intracellular survival of staphylococci. J Exp Med. 1959;110:123–138. [PubMed] 37. Melly M, Thomison J, Rogers D. Fate of staphylococci with human leukocytes. J Exp Med. 1960;112:1121–1130. [PubMed] 38. Rogers DE, Tompsett R. The survival of staphylococci within human leukocytes. J Exp Med. 1952;95:209–230. [PubMed] 39. Voyich JM, Braughton KR, Sturdevant DE, Whitney AR, Said-Salim B, et al. Insights into mechanisms used by Staphylococcus aureus to avoid destruction by human neutrophils. J Immunol. 2005;175:3907–3919. [PubMed] 40. Gresham HD, Lowrance JH, Caver TE, Wilson BS, Cheung AL, et al. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus inside neutrophils contributes to infection. J Immunol. 2000;164:3713–3722. [PubMed] 41. Savill J, Haslett C. Fate of Neutrophils. In: Hellewell PG, Williams TJ, editors. Immunopharmacology of Neutrophils. Academic Press Inc.; 1994. pp. 295–314. 42. Bellingan GJ, Caldwell H, Howie SEM, Dransfield I, Haslett C. In vivo fate of the inflammatory macrophageduring the resolution of inflammation: inflammatory macrophages do not die locally, but emigrate to the draining lymph nodes. J Immunol. 1996;157:2577–2585. [PubMed] 43. Harmsen AG, Muggenburg BA, Snipes MB, Bice DE. The role of macrophages in particle translocation from lungs to lymph nodes. Science. 1985;230:1277–1280. [PubMed] 44. Petti CA, Fowler VG., Jr Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. Cardiol Clin. 2003;21:219–233. [PubMed] 45. Baughn R, Bonventre PF. Phagocytosis and intracellular killing of Staphylococcus aureus by normal mouse peritoneal macrophages. Infect Immun. 1975;12:346–352. [PubMed] 46. Hebert A, Sayasith K, Senechal S, Dubreuil P, Lagace J. Demonstration of intracellular Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mastitis alveolar cells and macrophages isolated from naturally infected cow milk. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;193:57–62. [PubMed] 47. Jakab GJ, Green GM. Defect in intracellular killing of Staphylococcus aureus within alveolar macrophages in Sendai virus-infected murine lungs. J Clin Invest. 1976;57:1533–1539. [PubMed] 48. Michailova L, Stoitsova S, Markova N, Kussovski V, Jordanova M, et al. Interaction of alveolar macrophages with Staphylococcus aureus and induction of microbial L-forms during infection in rats. Int J Med Microbiol. 2000;290:259–267. [PubMed] 49. Elliott GR, Peterson PK, Verbrugh HA, Freiberg MR, Hoidal JR, et al. Influence of subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin, cephalothin, and clindamycin on Staphylococcus aureus growth in human phagocytic cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:781–784. [PubMed] 50. Ali F, Lee ME, Iannelli F, Pozzi G, Mitchell TJ, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae-associated human macrophage apoptosis after bacterial internalization via complement and Fc-gamma receptors correlates with intracellular bacterial load. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1119–1131. [PubMed] 51. Koterski JF, Nahvi M, Venkatesan MM, Haimovich B. Virulent Shigella flexneri causes damage to mitochondria and triggers necrosis in infected human monocyte-derived macrophages. Infect Immun. 2005;73:504–513. [PubMed] 52. Monack DM, Raupach B, Hromocky AE, Falkow S. Salmonella typhimurium invasion induces apoptosis in infected macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:9833–9838. [PubMed] 53. Monack DM, Mecsas J, Ghori N, Falkow S. Yersinia signals macrophages to undergo apoptosis and YopJ is necessary for this cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:10385–10390. [PubMed] 54. Sun GW, Lu J, Pervaiz S, Cao WP, Gan YH. Caspase-1 dependent macrophage death induced by Burkholderia pseudomallei. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1447–1458. [PubMed] 55. Zychlinsky A, Prevost MC, Sansonetti PJ. Shigella flexneri induces apoptosis in infected macrophages. Nature. 1992;358:167–169. [PubMed] 56. Sabat A, Krzysztoń-Russjan J, Strzałka W, Filipek R, Kosowska K, et al. New method for typing Staphylococcus aureus strains: multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of polymorphism and genetic relationships of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1801–1804. [PubMed] 57. Decker T, Muller M, Stockinger S. The yin and yang of type I interferon activity in bacterial infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:675–687. [PubMed] 58. Gruenberg J, van der Goot FG. Mechanisms of pathogen entry through the endosomal compartments. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:495–504. [PubMed] 59. Rosenberger CM, Finley B. Phagocyte sabotage:disruption of macrophage signalling by bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:385–396. [PubMed] 60. Giachino P, Engelmann S, Bischoff M. Sigma(B) activity depends on RsbU in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:1843–1852. [PubMed] 61. Horsburgh MJ, Aish JL, White IJ, Shaw L, Lithgow JK, et al. sigmaB modulates virulence determinant expression and stress resistance: characterization of a functional rsbU strain derived from Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:5457–5467. [PubMed] 62. Shompole S, Henton KT, Liou LE, Dziewanowska K, Bohach GA, et al. Biphasic intracellular expression of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors and evidence for Agr-mediated diffusion sensing. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:919–927. [PubMed] 63. Alexander EH, Rivera FA, Marriott I, Anguita J, Bost KL. Staphylococcus aureus-induced tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand expression mediates apoptosis and caspase-8 activation in infected osteoblasts. BMC Microbiol. 2003;2:3–5. 64. Haslinger-Loffler B, Wagner B, Bruck M, Strangfeld K, Grundmeier M, et al. Staphylococcus aureus induces caspase-independent cell death in human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1089–1098. [PubMed] 65. Mempel M, Schopp C, Hojka M, Fesq H, Weidinger S, et al. Invasion of human keratinocytes by Staphylococcus aureus and intracellular bacterial persistence represent haemolysin-independent virulence mechanisms that are followed by features of necrotic and apoptotic keratinocyte cell death. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:943–51. [PubMed] 66. Baran J, Weglarczyk K, Mysiak M, Guzik K, Ernst M, et al. Fas (CD95)-Fas ligand interactions are responsible for monocyte apoptosis occurring as a result of phagocytosis and killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2001;69:1287–1297. [PubMed] 67. Weglarczyk K, Baran J, Zembala M, Pryjma J. Caspase-8 activation precedes alterations of mitochondrial membrane potential during monocyte apoptosis induced by phagocytosis and killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2004;72:2590–2597. [PubMed] 68. Stuart LM, Ezekowitz RA. Phagocytosis: elegant complexity. Immunity. 2005;22:539–550. [PubMed] 69. Underhill DM, Ozinsky A. Phagocytosis of microbes: complexity in action. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:825–852. [PubMed] 70. Stuart LM, Deng J, Silver JM, Takahashi K, Tseng AA, et al. Response to Staphylococcus aureus requires CD36-mediated phagocytosis triggered by the COOH-terminal cytoplasmic domain. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:477–485. [PubMed] 71. Bischoff M, Dunman P, Kormanec J, Macapagal D, Murphy E, et al. Microarray-based analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus sigmaB regulon. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4085–4099. [PubMed] 72. Shaw LN, Aish J, Davenport JE, Brown MC, Lithgow JK, et al. Investigations into sigmaB-modulated regulatory pathways governing extracellular virulence determinant production in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:6070–6080. [PubMed] 73. Liu GY, Essex A, Buchanan JT, Datta V, Hoffman HM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus golden pigment impairs neutrophil killing and promotes virulence through its antioxidant activity. J Exp Med. 2005;202:209–215. [PubMed] 74. Qazi SN, Counil E, Morrissey J, Rees CE, Cockayne A, et al. agr expression precedes escape of internalized Staphylococcus aureus from the host endosome. Infect Immun. 2001;69:7074–7082. [PubMed] 75. Dunman PM, Murphy E, Haney S, Palacios D, Tucker-Kellogg G, et al. Transcription profiling-based identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes regulated by the agr and/or sarA loci. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:7341–7353. [PubMed] 76. Bantel H, Sinha B, Domschke W, Peters G, Schulze-Osthoff K, et al. alpha-Toxin is a mediator of Staphylococcus aureus-induced cell death and activates caspases via the intrinsic death pathway independently of death receptor signaling. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:637–648. [PubMed] 77. Burlak C, Hammer CH, Robinson MA, Whitney AR, McGavin MJ, et al. Global analysis of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exoproteins reveals molecules produced in vitro and during infection. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1172–1190. [PubMed] 78. Menzies BE, Kourteva I. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin induces apoptosis in endothelial cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000;29:39–45. [PubMed] 79. Shaw L, Golonka E, Potempa J, Foster SJ. The role and regulation of the extracellular proteases of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology. 2004;150:217–228. [PubMed] 80. Grundmeier M, Hussain M, Becker P, Heilmann C, Peters G, et al. Truncation of fibronectin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman leads to deficient adherence and host cell invasion due to loss of the cell wall anchor function. Infect Immun. 2004;72:7155–7163. [PubMed] 81. Gómez MI, Lee A, Reddy B, Muir A, Soong G, Pitt A, Cheung A, Prince A. Staphylococcus aureus protein A induces airway epithelial inflammatory responses by activating TNFR1. Nat Med. 2004;10:842–848. 82. Proctor RA, von Eiff C, Kahl BC, Becker K, McNamara P, et al. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:295–305. [PubMed] 83. Drevets DA. Dissemination of Listeria monocytogenes by infected phagocytes. Infect Immun. 1999;67:3512–3517. [PubMed] 84. Join-Lambert OF, Ezine S, Le Monnier A, Jaubert F, Okabe M, et al. Listeria monocytogenes-infected bone marrow myeloid cells promote bacterial invasion of the central nervous system. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:167–180. [PubMed] 85. Russell DG. Who puts the tubercle in tuberculosis? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:39–47. [PubMed] 86. Guzik K, Bzowska M, Smagur J, Krupa O, Sieprawska M, et al. A new insight into phagocytosis of apoptotic cells: proteolytic enzymes divert the recognition and clearance of polymorphonuclear leukocytes by macrophages. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:171–182. [PubMed] 87. Karnovsky MJ. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1965;27:137–138a. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 May; 26(5):1179-81.
[Clin Infect Dis. 1998]N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 20; 339(8):520-32.
[N Engl J Med. 1998]Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 May; 5(5):275-86.
[Lancet Infect Dis. 2005]Trends Microbiol. 1998 Dec; 6(12):484-8.
[Trends Microbiol. 1998]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Dec; 3(12):948-58.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005]Trends Microbiol. 2004 Aug; 12(8):378-85.
[Trends Microbiol. 2004]FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004 Jan 15; 40(1):1-9.
[FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Jun; 48(6):1429-49.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2001 Sep; 183(17):5171-9.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004 May; 28(2):183-200.
[FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004]Infect Immun. 1993 Sep; 61(9):3879-85.
[Infect Immun. 1993]J Clin Invest. 1994 Nov; 94(5):1815-22.
[J Clin Invest. 1994]N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 20; 339(8):520-32.
[N Engl J Med. 1998]J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 15; 192(6):1023-8.
[J Infect Dis. 2005]Infect Immun. 1998 Jan; 66(1):336-42.
[Infect Immun. 1998]Microbiology. 1999 Dec; 145 ( Pt 12)():3477-86.
[Microbiology. 1999]Eur J Cell Biol. 2000 Oct; 79(10):672-9.
[Eur J Cell Biol. 2000]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002 Feb; 5(1):56-61.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002]Cell Microbiol. 2006 Apr; 8(4):690-703.
[Cell Microbiol. 2006]J Exp Med. 1959 Jul 1; 110(1):123-38.
[J Exp Med. 1959]J Exp Med. 1952 Feb; 95(2):209-30.
[J Exp Med. 1952]J Immunol. 2005 Sep 15; 175(6):3907-19.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Infect Dis. 2003 Oct 15; 188(8):1119-31.
[J Infect Dis. 2003]Nature. 1992 Jul 9; 358(6382):167-9.
[Nature. 1992]J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 41(4):1801-4.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2003]Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 Sep; 5(9):675-87.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2005]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jul; 7(7):495-504.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 May; 4(5):385-96.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003]Cell Microbiol. 2005 Aug; 7(8):1087-97.
[Cell Microbiol. 2005]J Immunol. 2000 Apr 1; 164(7):3713-22.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Bacteriol. 2001 Mar; 183(6):1843-52.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]J Bacteriol. 2002 Oct; 184(19):5457-67.
[J Bacteriol. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Jun; 48(6):1429-49.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]Infect Immun. 1998 Jan; 66(1):336-42.
[Infect Immun. 1998]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Aug; 49(4):919-27.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]Infect Immun. 1975 Aug; 12(2):346-52.
[Infect Immun. 1975]J Clin Invest. 1976 Jun; 57(6):1533-9.
[J Clin Invest. 1976]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov; 22(5):781-4.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982]J Surg Res. 2003 Sep; 114(1):42-9.
[J Surg Res. 2003]Br J Dermatol. 2002 Jun; 146(6):943-51.
[Br J Dermatol. 2002]Immunity. 2005 May; 22(5):539-50.
[Immunity. 2005]J Cell Biol. 2005 Aug 1; 170(3):477-85.
[J Cell Biol. 2005]J Immunol. 2000 Apr 1; 164(7):3713-22.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2007 Jan 26; 282(4):2695-706.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]Cell Microbiol. 2005 Aug; 7(8):1087-97.
[Cell Microbiol. 2005]J Immunol. 2000 Apr 1; 164(7):3713-22.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul; 186(13):4085-99.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2006 Sep; 188(17):6070-80.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]J Exp Med. 2005 Jul 18; 202(2):209-15.
[J Exp Med. 2005]Cell Microbiol. 2005 Aug; 7(8):1087-97.
[Cell Microbiol. 2005]Infect Immun. 1998 Nov; 66(11):5238-43.
[Infect Immun. 1998]Infect Immun. 2001 Nov; 69(11):7074-82.
[Infect Immun. 2001]J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec; 183(24):7341-53.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]Cell Microbiol. 2003 Oct; 5(10):729-41.
[Cell Microbiol. 2003]Cell Microbiol. 2007 May; 9(5):1172-90.
[Cell Microbiol. 2007]Microbiology. 2004 Jan; 150(Pt 1):217-28.
[Microbiology. 2004]Infect Immun. 2004 Dec; 72(12):7155-63.
[Infect Immun. 2004]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr; 4(4):295-305.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Infect Immun. 1999 Jul; 67(7):3512-7.
[Infect Immun. 1999]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Jan; 5(1):39-47.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007]Cell Death Differ. 2007 Jan; 14(1):171-82.
[Cell Death Differ. 2007]J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 41(4):1801-4.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2003]