![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007, American Society of Plant Biologists A Trafficking Pathway for Anthocyanins Overlaps with the Endoplasmic Reticulum-to-Vacuole Protein-Sorting Route in Arabidopsis and Contributes to the Formation of Vacuolar Inclusions1[W][OA] Department of Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology and Plant Biotechnology Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 *Corresponding author; e-mail grotewold.1/at/osu.edu. 2These authors contributed equally to the article. Received July 3, 2007; Accepted September 24, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Plants produce a very large number of specialized compounds that must be transported from their site of synthesis to the sites of storage or disposal. Anthocyanin accumulation has provided a powerful system to elucidate the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with the intracellular trafficking of phytochemicals. Benefiting from the unique fluorescent properties of anthocyanins, we show here that in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), one route for anthocyanin transport to the vacuole involves vesicle-like structures shared with components of the secretory pathway. By colocalizing the red fluorescence of the anthocyanins with green fluorescent protein markers of the endomembrane system in Arabidopsis seedlings, we show that anthocyanins are also sequestered to the endoplasmic reticulum and to endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicle-like structures targeted directly to the protein storage vacuole in a Golgi-independent manner. Moreover, our results indicate that vacuolar accumulation of anthocyanins does not depend solely on glutathione S-transferase activity or ATP-dependent transport mechanisms. Indeed, we observed a dramatic increase of anthocyanin-filled subvacuolar structures, without a significant effect on total anthocyanin levels, when we inhibited glutathione S-transferase activity, or the ATP-dependent transporters with vanadate, a general ATPase inhibitor. Taken together, these results provide evidence for an alternative novel mechanism of vesicular transport and vacuolar sequestration of anthocyanins in Arabidopsis. The accurate delivery and sequestration of chemically reactive and potentially toxic metabolites pose a significant challenge for plant cells, which can simultaneously accumulate hundreds of different phytochemicals, derived from both primary and secondary metabolism. Establishing the cellular and molecular mechanisms that participate in the trafficking of phytochemicals within and between plant cells poses an important biological problem, with significant implications for the engineering of plant metabolism. Anthocyanins are one of the major classes of plant pigments and serve multiple ecophysiological functions (Grotewold, 2006). Anthocyanins are synthesized from the general phenylpropanoid pathway by the action of a metabolon loosely associated with the cytoplasmic face of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and likely forming a multienzyme complex (Winkel-Shirley, 1999; Winkel, 2004). Once synthesized, anthocyanins accumulate in a large central vacuole; this localization is necessary to prevent oxidation (Marrs et al., 1995) and for anthocyanins to function as pigments. In vivo anthocyanin coloration is significantly affected by factors that influence vacuolar pH (Yoshida et al., 1995), the presence of copigments (Forkmann, 1991), and the formation of anthocyanic vacuolar inclusions (AVIs; Markham et al., 2000). Thus, anthocyanins (or anthocyanin precursors) need to be transported from the cytoplasmic surface of the ER to the vacuole. Over the past few years, several factors that affect proper sequestration of anthocyanins have been identified. Perturbation in modifications of the core anthocyanidin skeleton required for uptake by the transporters leads to accumulation of the flavonoid in the cytoplasm. In maize (Zea mays), impairment of the UDP-Glc:cyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase gene BRONZE1 (BZ1) suppresses anthocyanin accumulation (Larson and Coe, 1977; Fedoroff et al., 1984). Mutations in the maize BZ2 gene, which encodes a glutathione (GSH) S-transferase (GST), prevent vacuolar localization of anthocyanins and brown oxidation products accumulate (hence, the name BZ2; Marrs et al., 1995). Similarly, the petunia (Petunia hybrida) AN9 gene encodes a GST and, despite the low identity between AN9 and BZ2, BZ2 complements AN9 mutants (Alfenito et al., 1998). Interestingly, the GST enzymatic activity of AN9 is not required for the AN9-dependent vacuolar sequestration of anthocyanins, suggesting that AN9/BZ2 serves as ligandins most likely for stabilization, but possibly also for escorting anthocyanins (e.g. cyanidin 3-glucoside) from the ER to the tonoplast (Mueller et al., 2000). Identification of the ZmMRP3 (maize tonoplast-localized multidrug resistance-associated protein), induced by the C1 and R anthocyanin regulators (Bruce et al., 2000), provides an additional player in a model involving carrier and transporter proteins in the trafficking of anthocyanins from the ER surface to the vacuole (Goodman et al., 2004). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutants in TRANSPARENT TESTA19 (TT19) affect both anthocyanin accumulation in vegetative tissues and proanthocyanidin (PA) accumulation in seed coats. TT19 encodes a GST and AN9 complements the anthocyanin, but not the PA defect of the tt19 mutant (Kitamura et al., 2004). Whereas TT19 and AN9/BZ2 may function similarly by stabilizing/escorting anthocyanins, the TT19 mutant has a distinctive phenotype in the seed coat, where PA precursors accumulate in cytoplasmic membrane-wrapped structures (Kitamura et al., 2004). This contrasts with the phenotype of mutations in the TT12 locus, encoding a multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter involved in PA vacuolar sequestration in which the PA precursors are evenly distributed in the cytoplasm (Debeaujon et al., 2001). Plant cells contain at least two different types of vacuolar compartments (Paris et al., 1996), which are most often referred to as the lytic and the protein storage vacuoles (PSVs). PSVs can be compound organelles, evidenced by the presence in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) seeds of a subvacuolar membrane-bound compartment containing organic acids and proteins (Jiang et al., 2001). The secretory pathway is responsible for the vacuolar transport of proteins through the interaction of specific sorting signals in the proteins and vacuolar-sorting receptors. The major route of vacuolar protein transport is from the ER through the trans-Golgi network (TGN) complex, a route that is shared among all eukaryotes (Neumann et al., 2003; Vitale and Hinz, 2005). However, a direct trafficking route from the ER to the vacuole exists in plants, which was first identified for the transport of proteins targeted to the PSV by large vesicles known as precursor-accumulating vesicles (Hara-Nishimura et al., 1998). Spindle-shaped ER bodies (Matsushima et al., 2003) provide additional possible vehicles for the transport of proteins, rubber, or oil from the ER to the vacuole by a mechanism resembling autophagy (Herman and Schmidt, 2004). Whether ER bodies are involved in the transport of PAs or anthocyanins from the ER to the vacuole remains unclear, but the localization of Arabidopsis flavonoid biosynthetic enzymes to large electron-dense cytoplasmic structures and to the tonoplast (Saslowsky and Winkel-Shirley, 2001) suggests that mechanisms other than cytoplasmic flavonoid carrier proteins are at play in the subcellular trafficking of anthocyanins. Most significant in highlighting a vesicular transport for flavonoids is the recent description of the tapetosomes as ER-derived structures that store ER-derived flavonols for their delivery to the Brassica pollen surface upon tapetal cell death (Hsieh and Huang, 2007). Taking advantage of unique red fluorescent and colored properties of anthocyanins, we describe here the colocalization of anthocyanins with vesicle-like structures containing a protein marker (GFP-Chi) for the PSV in Arabidopsis. Consistent with a TGN-independent ER-to-vacuole vesicular transport of anthocyanins, Brefeldin A (BFA), a Golgi-disturbing agent (Dinter and Berger, 1998), has no effect on the accumulation of anthocyanins and the red fluorescent anthocyanins are detected in ER compartments identified by GFP fused to an ER retention signal (GFP-HDEL). We describe the accumulation of anthocyanins in the vacuole in neutral red (NR)-staining subvacuolar compartments. In sharp departure from what has been observed in other plants, treatment with ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport inhibitors does not significantly decrease the amount of anthocyanins. However, vanadate, a fairly general inhibitor of ATPases, including ABC transporters, induces a dramatic increase of anthocyanin-filled subvacuolar structures. Our results indicate that Arabidopsis cells accumulating high levels of anthocyanins utilize components of the protein secretory trafficking pathway for the direct transport of anthocyanin pigments from the ER to the vacuole and provide evidence for the existence of novel subvacuolar compartments for their storage. RESULTS Induction of Anthocyanin Accumulation in Arabidopsis Seedlings To induce high anthocyanin levels in young seedlings, we grow seeds for 2 to 3 d under high light conditions in plain liquid Suc medium without a nitrogen source (anthocyanin inductive condition; see “Materials and Methods”). If tt5 seedlings are grown in similar conditions (Fig. 1A
Novel Fluorescent Properties of Arabidopsis Anthocyanins The fluorescence provided by the ring-stacking interaction of flavonol and flavone aglycones with diphenylboric acid (DPBA) has been utilized to investigate the localization of several flavonoids (Buer and Muday, 2004; Peer and Murphy, 2006; Vargo et al., 2006; Hsieh and Huang, 2007). However, DPBA does not fluoresce with anthocyanins, prompting us to seek another means for cytoplasmic visualization of these compounds. To determine whether anthocyanins fluoresce in a spectral range that would allow the visualization of these compounds in the presence of GFP markers of the endomembrane trafficking system, we investigated the fluorescence properties of Arabidopsis anthocyanins. Mutant tt5 seedlings grown in anthocyanin inductive conditions in the absence of naringenin showed no fluorescence in the red channel when excited at 488 and 544 nm of the argon-ion and helium-neon lasers, respectively (emission >565 nm; Fig. 2A
To demonstrate that red fluorescence was due to the anthocyanidins/anthocyanins and not to another pathway intermediate, acid-hydrolyzed methanol extracts from wild-type (Ler) and tt5 seedlings were separated on a cellulose thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate. As previously described (Dong et al., 2001), a single spot corresponding to cyanidin was observed, which was absent in tt5 seedlings (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Under UV light (approximately 254 nm), this spot fluoresces red. The cyanidin spot of the TLC plate was imaged using confocal laser-scanning microscopy using the same excitation and emission wavelengths as used for microscopy of the seedlings. Cyanidin-loaded cellulose fluoresced red when excited at 488/544 nm and visualized using the long-pass emission filter of 565LP. No fluorescence was observed using the 515- to 530-nm emission filter. The blank sample, a cellulose spot below the origin, did not fluoresce (Supplemental Fig. S1B). To conclusively prove that the red fluorescence observed during microscopy did come from the anthocyanin/anthocyanidin, we measured the emission spectra from the cyanidin spot isolated from the TLC plate using fluorescence spectrophotometry. The cyanidin spot was extracted from the cellulose plate using 95% ethanol. Absorption and fluorescence spectra (Fig. 2B Anthocyanins Share a Golgi-Independent, Vesicular Trafficking Pathway with Proteins Targeted to the PSV The plant secretory system involves multiple pathways for the transport of proteins to the vacuole (Carter et al., 2004), and GFP fusion markers (Chalfie et al., 1994) permit distinguishing between them (Neuhaus, 2000; Di Sansebastiano et al., 2001). To establish whether the ER or ER bodies are a possible initial site of anthocyanin accumulation, as previously suggested for maize (Grotewold et al., 1998) and recently described for flavonols in Brassica and Arabidopsis tapetum cells (Hsieh and Huang, 2007), Arabidopsis seedlings transformed with GFP-HDEL (Haseloff et al., 1997), where HDEL corresponds to an ER-retention signal sequence, were grown under anthocyanin inductive conditions, with (+N) or without (−N) naringenin (Fig. 3
To investigate the possible transport route of anthocyanins from the ER bodies to the vacuole, we utilized intact plants (Fig. 4, A–D GFP-Chi grown in anthocyanin inductive conditions for 3 d show green fluorescence provided by GFP-Chi in discrete structures that could correspond to the ER and to small peripheral vacuoles (Fig. 4A
δ-Tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP) was previously shown to localize to vegetative storage protein- and pigment-accumulating vacuoles (Jauh et al., 1999). Consistent with this, we observed that δ-TIP-marked vacuoles accumulated anthocyanins as seen in the colocalization of red anthocyanin fluorescence in vacuoles with δ-TIP-GFP in epidermal cells (Fig. 4, I–L To explore whether anthocyanins would also colocalize with components of the secretory pathway that utilize the TGN for transport from the ER to the vacuole, we utilized Arabidopsis lines expressing an N-terminal vacuolar-sorting determinant from the barley aleurain fused to GFP (Ale-GFP; Di Sansebastiano et al., 2001). Epidermal cells of 35S Ale-GFP-expressing seedlings grown under anthocyanin inductive conditions (Fig. 4, M–PTo conclusively establish that the observed vesicular trafficking of anthocyanins did not involve the TGN, we investigated the effect of BFA, a Golgi-disturbing agent (Driouich et al., 1993; Satiat-Jeunemaitre et al., 1996), on the accumulation of anthocyanins and the formation of AVIs. After incubating 2.5-d-old tt5 seedlings with BFA (10 μg/mL) for 1 h, we added 100 μm naringenin and measured the amount of anthocyanins that accumulated after 24 h. No difference was observed in the levels of anthocyanins when comparing BFA-treated and nontreated seedlings, nor did we observe any effect of BFA on the formation of the AVIs (Fig. 5A
Anthocyanin-Accumulating Subvacuolar Structures in Arabidopsis The normally low anthocyanin pigment accumulation of Arabidopsis vegetative green tissues is dramatically enhanced in PAP1-D plants, resulting from the overexpression of the PAP1 R2R3-MYB anthocyanin regulator (Borevitz et al., 2000; Tohge et al., 2005). Yet, the PAP1-D pigmentation phenotype is usually not observed until plants are 2 to 3 weeks old. The microscopic observation of pigmented tissues in the PAP1-D plants revealed, in a fraction of the pigmented epidermal cells, the presence of small anthocyanin inclusions that appeared as rounded spherical structures, apparently within the large central vacuole (Fig. 6A
NR provides a vital vacuolar stain that diffuses through membranes, but is trapped in the acidic vacuolar compartment by protonation (Ehara et al., 1996; Di Sansebastiano et al., 1998). Staining of PAP1-D leaves with NR showed the presence of NR-staining bodies in over 70% of epidermal cells. These NR-staining bodies were similar in shape and size to the anthocyanin inclusions, but were present in wild type in a larger number of cells (Fig. 6B To determine whether the anthocyanin inclusions were inside the vacuole or whether they corresponded to a separate NR-staining acidic compartment, vacuoles were isolated from PAP1-D plants (see “Materials and Methods”). The NR-staining and anthocyanin-accumulating bodies were always observed inside the large central vacuole (Fig. 6, C and D Participation of ABC Transporters and GSTs on AVI Formation Vanadate significantly reduces anthocyanin accumulation in maize cells (Marrs et al., 1995). To investigate the effect of vanadate in the accumulation of anthocyanins and in the formation of AVIs in Arabidopsis, tt5 seedlings were grown in anthocyanin inductive conditions for 2.5 d and treated with 1 mm vanadate 1 h prior to the addition of 100 μm naringenin. Whereas anthocyanins take longer to accumulate in the vanadate-treated seedlings compared to the untreated control (Fig. 5A
A major function of plant ABC transporters, particularly from the MRP family, is to pump conjugates of potentially toxic compounds with GSH to the vacuole (Klein et al., 2006). To establish the participation of GSH or GSTs in the accumulation of anthocyanins and in the formation of AVIs, we treated tt5 seedlings grown in anthocyanin inductive conditions with 100 μm naringenin and with 1 mm buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), which depletes cellular GSH levels, or with 0.1 mm 1-chloro-2-4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB), a common GST substrate that saturates the enzymes, decreasing the activity on other substrates. Similarly, as observed with vanadate, both treatments resulted in significant increase in the accumulation of AVIs, but without the bathochromic shift (Fig. 6, E–H DISCUSSION Despite the fundamental importance for plants to properly transport and sequester phytochemicals, little is known about the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in these processes. Taking advantage of novel anthocyanin red autofluorescence properties in combination with protein markers for the secretory pathway, we describe here a TGN-independent ER-to-vacuole vesicular anthocyanin-trafficking route shared with proteins targeted to the PSV. We also uncover the presence of novel Arabidopsis anthocyanin-accumulating subvacuolar structures that resemble the anthocyanoplasts/AVIs present in the pigmented tissues of many other plant species. Establishing trafficking pathways for anthocyanins has been complicated by the fact that the color of the compounds depends on the proper conditions (pH and modifications) furnished by the vacuole. Anthocyanin extracts from red cabbage (Brassica oleracea) were previously shown to fluoresce with peaks at 363, 434, and 519 nm (Drabent et al., 1999). Our studies, however, identified significant fluorescence in vivo for total anthocyanins and for individual pigments above 565 nm (Fig. 2 Taking advantage of the fluorescent properties of anthocyanins, we exposed a trafficking mechanism for these compounds from the ER to the vacuole that involves membrane-bound structures that initially contain the ER marker GFP-HDEL (Fig. 3 In many plant species, anthocyanins accumulate in the vacuole in discrete structures described by a variety of names (Pecket and Small, 1980; Nozzolillo and Ishikura, 1988; Nozue et al., 1993; Kubo et al., 1995; Markham et al., 2000; Conn et al., 2003; Irani and Grotewold, 2005; Zhang et al., 2006). We found here that intravacuolar anthocyanin-accumulating inclusions are also present in Arabidopsis, particularly in cells induced to accumulate high anthocyanin levels, either as a consequence of the expression of the PAP1 regulator or by the addition of the pathway intermediate, naringenin. These inclusions stained heavily with NR (Fig. 5 To investigate the possibility that an autophagic mechanism (Marty, 1978) is involved in the formation of the subvacuolar structures, we looked into whether a mutation in the ATG7 locus (atg7-1 in the Wassilewskija [Ws] genetic background) affects the formation of the NR-staining structures or the formation of AVIs. ATG7 encodes the Arabidopsis E1-like ATP-dependent activating enzyme required for autophagy (Doelling et al., 2002), previously known as APG7 (Klionsky et al., 2003). We could not detect any significant difference in the number of NR-staining subvacuolar structures or AVIs (under anthocyanin inductive conditions) between atg7-1 and Ws (data not shown). However, Ws seedlings accumulated less anthocyanins and had a significantly lower number of AVIs when compared to Ler or Columbia seedlings (data not shown), indicating that natural variation among accessions influences the physiology of these subvacuolar compartments, something that needs to be taken into consideration when comparing mutants. To further eliminate a possible role of autophagy, we investigated the effect of 3-methyladenine (3-MA), a potent autophagy inhibitor in animal (Seglen and Gordon, 1982) and plant (Takatsuka et al., 2004) cells, on anthocyanin accumulation and AVI formation. 3-MA functions by inhibiting the PI3K enzyme necessary for the nucleation of preautophagic structures (Thompson and Vierstra, 2005). Treatment of 3-d-old tt5 seedlings grown in anthocyanin inductive conditions with 10 mm 3-MA and 100 μm naringenin resulted in similar anthocyanin levels and number of AVIs (data not shown), yet affected, as expected, the distribution of the GFP-Chi marker (Supplemental Fig. S3). These results led us to conclude that a classical autophagic mechanism is unlikely to be involved in the formation of AVIs. The existence of a vesicular-type transport of anthocyanins from the ER to the vacuole provides an alternative to models that involve AN9/BZ2-like GST carrier proteins and/or tonoplast transporters for the cytoplasmic and tonoplast trafficking of these compounds, respectively (Alfenito et al., 1998; Mueller et al., 2000; Mueller and Walbot, 2001; Goodman et al., 2004). Interestingly, whereas the tt19 mutation completely abolishes anthocyanin and PA accumulation (Kitamura et al., 2004), perturbing the formation or vacuolar uptake of GSH conjugates (GS-X) with CDNB or BSO or inhibiting ABC transporters with vanadate increases the number of AVIs (Fig. 7 The results presented here provide a new perspective with regard to ER-to-vacuole trafficking and vacuolar sequestration of anthocyanin pigments, and maybe of other vacuole-targeted phenolic compounds as well. Whereas our results do not rule out the existence of other mechanisms for transport of anthocyanins to the vacuole, such as the interplay of GSTs and tonoplast transporters (Goodman et al., 2004), they highlight the existence of vesicular transport of anthocyanins with properties shared with the secretory pathway. Cellular, molecular, and genetic tools are becoming increasingly available in Arabidopsis to further dissect the mechanisms by which anthocyanins are transported and sequestered in the vacuole. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Materials and Growth Conditions GFP-HDEL (Haseloff, 1999), GFP-Chi (Di Sansebastiano et al., 1998), and Ale-GFP (Di Sansebastiano et al., 2001) were used as GFP-expressing lines. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CHI (tt5-1), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (tt6), dihydroflavonol reductase (tt3), and PAP-1D seeds were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. For induction of anthocyanins in seedlings (anthocyanin inductive conditions), seeds were surface sterilized and plated in water containing 3% Suc. After 2 d of stratification at 4°C, seeds were germinated for 2 to 4 d at 25°C ± 2°C in continuous cool-white light (GE F30T12-CW-RS) at approximately 100 ± 10 μmol m−2 s−1 on a rotary shaker at 100 rpm. For naringenin treatments, seedlings were allowed to grow for 2.5 d and then naringenin (Aldrich) was added to a final concentration of 100 or 200 μm from a 100 mm stock (in ethanol). Treatments with various chemicals were carried out after seedlings were germinated for 2.5 d (unless otherwise indicated). Seedlings were preincubated with each inhibitor (Sigma) for 1 h at 25°C ± 2°C before the addition of naringenin. Only 3-MA was added 12 h before the naringenin treatment. The final concentrations were 1 mm for vanadate (stock solution 1 m sodium orthovanadate in water), 10 μg/mL for BFA (stock solution 10 mg/mL in ethanol), and 10 mm for 3-MA (stock solution 1 m in water). Each treatment was done at least in triplicate. Soil-sown seeds were stratified at 4°C for 2 d and transferred to a growth chamber at 22°C ± 2°C with a 16-h dark/8-h light photoperiod. Anthocyanin Extraction, Analysis, and Quantification After different treatments, seedlings were harvested, rinsed with water, and lyophilized for 2 d. Dry weight was measured and 50% methanol was added to get a final suspension of 50 μg/μL (w/v). Two volumes of acidic methanol (1% HCl in 50% MeOH) were added and absorption read at 530 nm using a Cary 50 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Varian) in 40-μL quartz microcuvettes. The fluorescence spectra of anthocyanins were determined on a Flex station spectrofluorimeter (Molecular Devices), with readings taken at 10-nm intervals. Aglycones were obtained by boiling the methanolic extracts containing 1 m HCL for 20 min. For TLC experiments, anthocyanidins were extracted by adding one-fourth of the original volume of isoamyl alcohol and separated on cellulose TLC plates (5,730/6; Merck) in a presaturated chamber with water:formic acid:HCl (10:30:3). HPLC analysis of flavonoids and anthocyanins was carried out by separating 20 μL of the methanolic extract on a C-18 column using a Waters Alliance 2695 separations module equipped with a 2996 photodiode array detector and a fluorescence detector (Waters Corporation). Flavonoids were separated using solvent A: 5% formic acid in water; solvent B: 5% formic acid in acetonitrile; 0 to 30 min, 95% A to 70% A, linear gradient; 30 to 35 min, 70% A to 95% A, linear gradient. Chromatograms and spectra were extracted and analyzed with Empower software (Waters Corporation). Protoplast and Vacuole Isolation Plant tissue (0.4 g) was sliced into pieces with a razor blade and incubated for 2 h at 25°C in the solution containing 2% (w/v) cellulase Onozuka R-10 (KARLAN) and 1% (w/v) macerozyme R-10 (KARLAN) dissolved in 4 mL of enzyme incubation medium (0.8 m mannitol, 60 mm MES, and 5 mm MgCl2, pH 5.5). Digested tissues were filtered through one layer of Miracloth (Calbiochem). Protoplasts were centrifuged at 600 rpm in a swing bucket centrifuge (Marathon 21000R; Fisher Scientific) for 10 min at 4°C. Vacuole isolation was then performed as previously described (Di Sansebastiano et al., 1998). Microscopy NR (Sigma) was dissolved in water and used at a final concentration 1 mg/mL. Seedlings, protoplasts, and vacuoles were incubated with NR for 20 min at room temperature. For quantifying the number of AVIs, the same area of abaxial epidermal cells of cotyledons was always observed, or cells were counted in the entire abaxial surface. Samples were examined using a PCM-2000/Nikon Eclipse 600 laser-scanning microscope (Nikon) equipped with an argon and helium-neon laser (Ex 488, 544). To visualize GFP and anthocyanins, a 515/30-nm band-pass emission filter (EM515/30HQ) and 565-nm long-pass filter (E565LP) were used, respectively. Light microscopy observations were made with a Nikon Eclipse 600 microscope equipped with Nomarski differential interference contrast optics. Images were captured and processed with a SPOT 2 slider CCD camera and the associated software (Diagnostic Instruments). All images were further processed using Adobe Photoshop software (Adobe Systems). Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We are very grateful to Gian-Pietro Di Sansebastiano for kindly providing us with Arabidopsis seeds expressing GFP-Chi and Ale-GFP; to Jed Doelling, Allison Smith, and Richard Vierstra for the atg7-1 seeds; to Satoshi Kitamura for the tt19 seeds and for sharing with us unpublished information; and to the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center for supplying us with numerous other seed stocks. We thank the Ohio State University Plant-Microbe Genomics Facility for partially financing the Metabolomics Laboratory, Biao Ding for technical assistance with microscopy, and Angela Rowe for technical assistance. Notes 1This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. MCB–0139962 to E.G.). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Erich Grotewold (grotewold.1/at/osu.edu). [W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA]Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006; 57():761-80.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006]Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004; 55():85-107.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004]Nature. 1995 Jun 1; 375(6530):397-400.
[Nature. 1995]Phytochemistry. 2000 Oct; 55(4):327-36.
[Phytochemistry. 2000]Biochem Genet. 1977 Feb; 15(1-2):153-6.
[Biochem Genet. 1977]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun; 81(12):3825-3829.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984]Nature. 1995 Jun 1; 375(6530):397-400.
[Nature. 1995]Plant Cell. 1998 Jul; 10(7):1135-49.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Plant Physiol. 2000 Aug; 123(4):1561-70.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Cell. 1996 May 17; 85(4):563-72.
[Cell. 1996]J Cell Biol. 2001 Dec 10; 155(6):991-1002.
[J Cell Biol. 2001]Ann Bot. 2003 Aug; 92(2):167-80.
[Ann Bot. 2003]Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jul; 10(7):316-23.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2005]Plant Cell. 1998 May; 10(5):825-36.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Histochem Cell Biol. 1998 May-Jun; 109(5-6):571-90.
[Histochem Cell Biol. 1998]Plant Cell. 1992 Mar; 4(3):333-47.
[Plant Cell. 1992]Plant Cell. 2004 May; 16(5):1191-205.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Biochem Pharmacol. 2006 Sep 14; 72(6):681-92.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 2006]Plant Cell. 2007 Feb; 19(2):582-96.
[Plant Cell. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2001 Sep; 127(1):46-57.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Plant Cell. 2000 Dec; 12(12):2383-2394.
[Plant Cell. 2000]Plant J. 2005 Apr; 42(2):218-35.
[Plant J. 2005]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Dec; 7(6):701-7.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Science. 1994 Feb 11; 263(5148):802-5.
[Science. 1994]Plant Physiol. 2001 May; 126(1):78-86.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Plant Cell. 1998 May; 10(5):721-40.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Plant Cell. 2007 Feb; 19(2):582-96.
[Plant Cell. 2007]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(4):449-57.
[Plant J. 1998]Plant Physiol. 2001 May; 126(1):78-86.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]J Exp Bot. 2003 Jun; 54(387):1577-84.
[J Exp Bot. 2003]Plant Cell. 1999 Oct; 11(10):1867-82.
[Plant Cell. 1999]Plant Physiol. 2001 May; 126(1):78-86.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]J Exp Bot. 2003 Jun; 54(387):1577-84.
[J Exp Bot. 2003]Plant Physiol. 1993 Apr; 101(4):1363-73.
[Plant Physiol. 1993]J Microsc. 1996 Feb; 181(Pt 2):162-77.
[J Microsc. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 22; 101(25):9497-501.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Plant Cell. 2000 Dec; 12(12):2383-2394.
[Plant Cell. 2000]Plant J. 2005 Apr; 42(2):218-35.
[Plant J. 2005]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(4):449-57.
[Plant J. 1998]Nature. 1995 Jun 1; 375(6530):397-400.
[Nature. 1995]FEBS Lett. 2006 Feb 13; 580(4):1112-22.
[FEBS Lett. 2006]Plant Cell Physiol. 2003 Jul; 44(7):661-6.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2004 Nov; 136(3):3440-6.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]J Exp Bot. 2003 Jun; 54(387):1577-84.
[J Exp Bot. 2003]Phytochemistry. 2000 Oct; 55(4):327-36.
[Phytochemistry. 2000]Biotechnol Lett. 2003 Jun; 25(11):835-9.
[Biotechnol Lett. 2003]BMC Plant Biol. 2005 May 20; 5():7.
[BMC Plant Biol. 2005]BMC Plant Biol. 2006 Dec 17; 6():29.
[BMC Plant Biol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Feb; 75(2):852-856.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978]J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 6; 277(36):33105-14.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Dev Cell. 2003 Oct; 5(4):539-45.
[Dev Cell. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Mar; 79(6):1889-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982]Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Mar; 45(3):265-74.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2004]Plant Cell. 1998 Jul; 10(7):1135-49.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Plant Physiol. 2000 Aug; 123(4):1561-70.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Plant Cell. 2004 Jul; 16(7):1812-26.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Plant J. 2004 Jan; 37(1):104-14.
[Plant J. 2004]Nature. 1995 Jun 1; 375(6530):397-400.
[Nature. 1995]Plant Cell. 2004 Jul; 16(7):1812-26.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Methods Cell Biol. 1999; 58():139-51.
[Methods Cell Biol. 1999]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(4):449-57.
[Plant J. 1998]Plant Physiol. 2001 May; 126(1):78-86.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(4):449-57.
[Plant J. 1998]