• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of prosciprotein sciencecshl presssubscriptionsetoc alertsthe protein societyjournal home
Protein Sci. Sep 2000; 9(9): 1753–1773.
PMCID: PMC2144714

Modeling of loops in protein structures.

Abstract

Comparative protein structure prediction is limited mostly by the errors in alignment and loop modeling. We describe here a new automated modeling technique that significantly improves the accuracy of loop predictions in protein structures. The positions of all nonhydrogen atoms of the loop are optimized in a fixed environment with respect to a pseudo energy function. The energy is a sum of many spatial restraints that include the bond length, bond angle, and improper dihedral angle terms from the CHARMM-22 force field, statistical preferences for the main-chain and side-chain dihedral angles, and statistical preferences for nonbonded atomic contacts that depend on the two atom types, their distance through space, and separation in sequence. The energy function is optimized with the method of conjugate gradients combined with molecular dynamics and simulated annealing. Typically, the predicted loop conformation corresponds to the lowest energy conformation among 500 independent optimizations. Predictions were made for 40 loops of known structure at each length from 1 to 14 residues. The accuracy of loop predictions is evaluated as a function of thoroughness of conformational sampling, loop length, and structural properties of native loops. When accuracy is measured by local superposition of the model on the native loop, 100, 90, and 30% of 4-, 8-, and 12-residue loop predictions, respectively, had <2 A RMSD error for the mainchain N, C(alpha), C, and O atoms; the average accuracies were 0.59 +/- 0.05, 1.16 +/- 0.10, and 2.61 +/- 0.16 A, respectively. To simulate real comparative modeling problems, the method was also evaluated by predicting loops of known structure in only approximately correct environments with errors typical of comparative modeling without misalignment. When the RMSD distortion of the main-chain stem atoms is 2.5 A, the average loop prediction error increased by 180, 25, and 3% for 4-, 8-, and 12-residue loops, respectively. The accuracy of the lowest energy prediction for a given loop can be estimated from the structural variability among a number of low energy predictions. The relative value of the present method is gauged by (1) comparing it with one of the most successful previously described methods, and (2) describing its accuracy in recent blind predictions of protein structure. Finally, it is shown that the average accuracy of prediction is limited primarily by the accuracy of the energy function rather than by the extent of conformational sampling.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.3M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Abagyan R, Batalov S, Cardozo T, Totrov M, Webber J, Zhou Y. Homology modeling with internal coordinate mechanics: deformation zone mapping and improvements of models via conformational search. Proteins. 1997;Suppl 1:29–37. [PubMed]
  • Abagyan R, Totrov M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 21;235(3):983–1002. [PubMed]
  • Bajorath J, Sheriff S. Comparison of an antibody model with an X-ray structure: the variable fragment of BR96. Proteins. 1996 Feb;24(2):152–157. [PubMed]
  • Benner SA, Cohen MA, Gonnet GH. Empirical and structural models for insertions and deletions in the divergent evolution of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 20;229(4):1065–1082. [PubMed]
  • Blundell TL, Sibanda BL, Sternberg MJ, Thornton JM. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature. 326(6111):347–352. [PubMed]
  • Brower RC, Vasmatzis G, Silverman M, Delisi C. Exhaustive conformational search and simulated annealing for models of lattice peptides. Biopolymers. 1993 Mar;33(3):329–334. [PubMed]
  • Browne WJ, North AC, Phillips DC, Brew K, Vanaman TC, Hill RL. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine alpha-lactalbumin based on that of hen's egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1969 May 28;42(1):65–86. [PubMed]
  • Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. Conformational sampling using high-temperature molecular dynamics. Biopolymers. 1990 Dec;29(14):1847–1862. [PubMed]
  • Bruccoleri RE, Haber E, Novotný J. Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm. Nature. 1988 Oct 6;335(6190):564–568. [PubMed]
  • Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers. 1987 Jan;26(1):137–168. [PubMed]
  • Carlacci L, Englander SW. The loop problem in proteins: a Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach. Biopolymers. 1993 Aug;33(8):1271–1286. [PubMed]
  • Chothia C, Lesk AM. Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Aug 20;196(4):901–917. [PubMed]
  • Chothia C, Lesk AM, Levitt M, Amit AG, Mariuzza RA, Phillips SE, Poljak RJ. The predicted structure of immunoglobulin D1.3 and its comparison with the crystal structure. Science. 1986 Aug 15;233(4765):755–758. [PubMed]
  • Chothia C, Lesk AM, Tramontano A, Levitt M, Smith-Gill SJ, Air G, Sheriff S, Padlan EA, Davies D, Tulip WR, et al. Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature. 1989 Dec 21;342(6252):877–883. [PubMed]
  • Chung SY, Subbiah S. A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology. Structure. 1996 Oct 15;4(10):1123–1127. [PubMed]
  • Claessens M, Van Cutsem E, Lasters I, Wodak S. Modelling the polypeptide backbone with 'spare parts' from known protein structures. Protein Eng. 1989 Jan;2(5):335–345. [PubMed]
  • Cohen BI, Presnell SR, Cohen FE. Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides. Protein Sci. 1993 Dec;2(12):2134–2145. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cohen FE, Abarbanel RM, Kuntz ID, Fletterick RJ. Turn prediction in proteins using a pattern-matching approach. Biochemistry. 1986 Jan 14;25(1):266–275. [PubMed]
  • Collura V, Higo J, Garnier J. Modeling of protein loops by simulated annealing. Protein Sci. 1993 Sep;2(9):1502–1510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Deane CM, Blundell TL. A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins. Proteins. 2000 Jul 1;40(1):135–144. [PubMed]
  • Donate LE, Rufino SD, Canard LH, Blundell TL. Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: a database for modeling and prediction. Protein Sci. 1996 Dec;5(12):2600–2616. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Evans JS, Mathiowetz AM, Chan SI, Goddard WA., 3rd De novo prediction of polypeptide conformations using dihedral probability grid Monte Carlo methodology. Protein Sci. 1995 Jun;4(6):1203–1216. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fechteler T, Dengler U, Schomburg D. Prediction of protein three-dimensional structures in insertion and deletion regions: a procedure for searching data bases of representative protein fragments using geometric scoring criteria. J Mol Biol. 1995 Oct 13;253(1):114–131. [PubMed]
  • Fetrow JS, Godzik A, Skolnick J. Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm: identification of proteins exhibiting the glutaredoxin/thioredoxin disulfide oxidoreductase activity. J Mol Biol. 1998 Oct 2;282(4):703–711. [PubMed]
  • Fidelis K, Stern PS, Bacon D, Moult J. Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng. 1994 Aug;7(8):953–960. [PubMed]
  • Fine RM, Wang H, Shenkin PS, Yarmush DL, Levinthal C. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations. II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations. Proteins. 1986 Dec;1(4):342–362. [PubMed]
  • Finkelstein AV, Reva BA. Search for the stable state of a short chain in a molecular field. Protein Eng. 1992 Oct;5(7):617–624. [PubMed]
  • Flores TP, Orengo CA, Moss DS, Thornton JM. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Sci. 1993 Nov;2(11):1811–1826. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fushman D, Cahill S, Cowburn D. The main-chain dynamics of the dynamin pleckstrin homology (PH) domain in solution: analysis of 15N relaxation with monomer/dimer equilibration. J Mol Biol. 1997 Feb 14;266(1):173–194. [PubMed]
  • Go N. The consistency principle in protein structure and pathways of folding. Adv Biophys. 1984;18:149–164. [PubMed]
  • Greer J. Model for haptoglobin heavy chain based upon structural homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3393–3397. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Guenther B, Onrust R, Sali A, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of the delta' subunit of the clamp-loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell. 1997 Oct 31;91(3):335–345. [PubMed]
  • Higo J, Collura V, Garnier J. Development of an extended simulated annealing method: application to the modeling of complementary determining regions of immunoglobulins. Biopolymers. 1992 Jan;32(1):33–43. [PubMed]
  • Huynen M, Doerks T, Eisenhaber F, Orengo C, Sunyaev S, Yuan Y, Bork P. Homology-based fold predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. J Mol Biol. 1998 Jul 17;280(3):323–326. [PubMed]
  • Janin J, Rodier F. Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts. Proteins. 1995 Dec;23(4):580–587. [PubMed]
  • Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol. 1999 Apr 9;287(4):797–815. [PubMed]
  • Jones S, Thornton JM. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol. 1997 Sep 12;272(1):133–143. [PubMed]
  • Jones S, van Heyningen P, Berman HM, Thornton JM. Protein-DNA interactions: A structural analysis. J Mol Biol. 1999 Apr 16;287(5):877–896. [PubMed]
  • Alwyn Jones T, Kleywegt GJ. CASP3 comparative modeling evaluation. Proteins. 1999;Suppl 3:30–46. [PubMed]
  • Jones TA, Thirup S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 1986 Apr;5(4):819–822. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983 Dec;22(12):2577–2637. [PubMed]
  • Kasuya A, Thornton JM. Three-dimensional structure analysis of PROSITE patterns. J Mol Biol. 1999 Mar 12;286(5):1673–1691. [PubMed]
  • Kick EK, Roe DC, Skillman AG, Liu G, Ewing TJ, Sun Y, Kuntz ID, Ellman JA. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. Chem Biol. 1997 Apr;4(4):297–307. [PubMed]
  • Kidera A. Enhanced conformational sampling in Monte Carlo simulations of proteins: application to a constrained peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Oct 10;92(21):9886–9889. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kinoshita K, Sadanami K, Kidera A, Go N. Structural motif of phosphate-binding site common to various protein superfamilies: all-against-all structural comparison of protein-mononucleotide complexes. Protein Eng. 1999 Jan;12(1):11–14. [PubMed]
  • Kleywegt GJ. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 29;285(4):1887–1897. [PubMed]
  • Koehl P, Delarue M. A self consistent mean field approach to simultaneous gap closure and side-chain positioning in homology modelling. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Feb;2(2):163–170. [PubMed]
  • Kwasigroch JM, Chomilier J, Mornon JP. A global taxonomy of loops in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jun 21;259(4):855–872. [PubMed]
  • Lessel U, Schomburg D. Similarities between protein 3-D structures. Protein Eng. 1994 Oct;7(10):1175–1187. [PubMed]
  • Levitt M. Molecular dynamics of native protein. II. Analysis and nature of motion. J Mol Biol. 1983 Aug 15;168(3):621–657. [PubMed]
  • Levitt M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jul 20;226(2):507–533. [PubMed]
  • Lu Y, Valentine JS. Engineering metal-binding sites in proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Aug;7(4):495–500. [PubMed]
  • Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):83–85. [PubMed]
  • Mandal C, Kingery BD, Anchin JM, Subramaniam S, Linthicum DS. ABGEN: a knowledge-based automated approach for antibody structure modeling. Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Mar;14(3):323–328. [PubMed]
  • Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000;29:291–325. [PubMed]
  • Martin AC, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins. 1997;Suppl 1:14–28. [PubMed]
  • Martin AC, Cheetham JC, Rees AR. Modeling antibody hypervariable loops: a combined algorithm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(23):9268–9272. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Martin AC, Thornton JM. Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies. J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 15;263(5):800–815. [PubMed]
  • Mas MT, Smith KC, Yarmush DL, Aisaka K, Fine RM. Modeling the anti-CEA antibody combining site by homology and conformational search. Proteins. 1992 Dec;14(4):483–498. [PubMed]
  • Mattos C, Petsko GA, Karplus M. Analysis of two-residue turns in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 20;238(5):733–747. [PubMed]
  • Melo F, Feytmans E. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol. 1997 Mar 21;267(1):207–222. [PubMed]
  • Mezei M. Chameleon sequences in the PDB. Protein Eng. 1998 Jun;11(6):411–414. [PubMed]
  • Mosimann S, Meleshko R, James MN. A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins. Proteins. 1995 Nov;23(3):301–317. [PubMed]
  • Moult J, Hubbard T, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III. Proteins. 1999;Suppl 3:2–6. [PubMed]
  • Moult J, James MN. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search. Proteins. 1986 Oct;1(2):146–163. [PubMed]
  • Nakajima N, Higo J, Kidera A, Nakamura H. Free energy landscapes of peptides by enhanced conformational sampling. J Mol Biol. 2000 Feb 11;296(1):197–216. [PubMed]
  • Oliva B, Bates PA, Querol E, Avilés FX, Sternberg MJ. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J Mol Biol. 1997 Mar 7;266(4):814–830. [PubMed]
  • Pascarella S, Argos P. Analysis of insertions/deletions in protein structures. J Mol Biol. 1992 Mar 20;224(2):461–471. [PubMed]
  • Pellequer JL, Chen SW. Does conformational free energy distinguish loop conformations in proteins? Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2359–2375. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Perona JJ, Craik CS. Structural basis of substrate specificity in the serine proteases. Protein Sci. 1995 Mar;4(3):337–360. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ponder JW, Richards FM. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol. 1987 Feb 20;193(4):775–791. [PubMed]
  • RAMACHANDRAN GN, RAMAKRISHNAN C, SASISEKHARAN V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J Mol Biol. 1963 Jul;7:95–99. [PubMed]
  • Rao U, Teeter MM. Improvement of turn structure prediction by molecular dynamics: a case study of alpha 1-purothionin. Protein Eng. 1993 Nov;6(8):837–847. [PubMed]
  • Rapp CS, Friesner RA. Prediction of loop geometries using a generalized born model of solvation effects. Proteins. 1999 May 1;35(2):173–183. [PubMed]
  • Reczko M, Martin AC, Bohr H, Suhai S. Prediction of hypervariable CDR-H3 loop structures in antibodies. Protein Eng. 1995 Apr;8(4):389–395. [PubMed]
  • Ring CS, Kneller DG, Langridge R, Cohen FE. Taxonomy and conformational analysis of loops in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 5;224(3):685–699. [PubMed]
  • Ring CS, Sun E, McKerrow JH, Lee GK, Rosenthal PJ, Kuntz ID, Cohen FE. Structure-based inhibitor design by using protein models for the development of antiparasitic agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3583–3587. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ringe D, Petsko GA. Mapping protein dynamics by X-ray diffraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1985;45(3):197–235. [PubMed]
  • Rosenbach D, Rosenfeld R. Simultaneous modeling of multiple loops in proteins. Protein Sci. 1995 Mar;4(3):496–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rosenfeld R, Zheng Q, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Computing the structure of bound peptides. Application to antigen recognition by class I major histocompatibility complex receptors. J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 5;234(3):515–521. [PubMed]
  • Rufino SD, Donate LE, Canard LH, Blundell TL. Predicting the conformational class of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: application to comparative modelling. J Mol Biol. 1997 Mar 28;267(2):352–367. [PubMed]
  • Russell RB, Sasieni PD, Sternberg MJ. Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol. 1998 Oct 2;282(4):903–918. [PubMed]
  • Rychlewski L, Zhang B, Godzik A. Fold and function predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. Fold Des. 1998;3(4):229–238. [PubMed]
  • Sali A. 100,000 protein structures for the biologist. Nat Struct Biol. 1998 Dec;5(12):1029–1032. [PubMed]
  • Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 5;234(3):779–815. [PubMed]
  • Samudrala R, Moult J. A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure. J Mol Biol. 1998 May 29;279(1):287–302. [PubMed]
  • Sánchez R, Sali A. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins. 1997;Suppl 1:50–58. [PubMed]
  • Sánchez R, Sali A. Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Apr;7(2):206–214. [PubMed]
  • Sánchez R, Sali A. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13597–13602. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sánchez R, Sali A. ModBase: a database of comparative protein structure models. Bioinformatics. 1999 Dec;15(12):1060–1061. [PubMed]
  • Sander C, Schneider R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins. 1991;9(1):56–68. [PubMed]
  • Shenkin PS, Yarmush DL, Fine RM, Wang HJ, Levinthal C. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ringlike structures. Biopolymers. 1987 Dec;26(12):2053–2085. [PubMed]
  • Shepherd AJ, Gorse D, Thornton JM. Prediction of the location and type of beta-turns in proteins using neural networks. Protein Sci. 1999 May;8(5):1045–1055. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sibanda BL, Blundell TL, Thornton JM. Conformation of beta-hairpins in protein structures. A systematic classification with applications to modelling by homology, electron density fitting and protein engineering. J Mol Biol. 1989 Apr 20;206(4):759–777. [PubMed]
  • Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):859–883. [PubMed]
  • Sippl MJ. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins. 1993 Dec;17(4):355–362. [PubMed]
  • Smith KC, Honig B. Evaluation of the conformational free energies of loops in proteins. Proteins. 1994 Feb;18(2):119–132. [PubMed]
  • Sudarsanam S, DuBose RF, March CJ, Srinivasan S. Modeling protein loops using a phi i + 1, psi i dimer database. Protein Sci. 1995 Jul;4(7):1412–1420. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Summers NL, Karplus M. Modeling of globular proteins. A distance-based data search procedure for the construction of insertion/deletion regions and Pro----non-Pro mutations. J Mol Biol. 1990 Dec 20;216(4):991–1016. [PubMed]
  • Tanner JJ, Nell LJ, McCammon JA. Anti-insulin antibody structure and conformation. II. Molecular dynamics with explicit solvent. Biopolymers. 1992 Jan;32(1):23–32. [PubMed]
  • Thanki N, Zeelen JP, Mathieu M, Jaenicke R, Abagyan RA, Wierenga RK, Schliebs W. Protein engineering with monomeric triosephosphate isomerase (monoTIM): the modelling and structure verification of a seven-residue loop. Protein Eng. 1997 Feb;10(2):159–167. [PubMed]
  • Topham CM, McLeod A, Eisenmenger F, Overington JP, Johnson MS, Blundell TL. Fragment ranking in modelling of protein structure. Conformationally constrained environmental amino acid substitution tables. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jan 5;229(1):194–220. [PubMed]
  • Tramontano A, Chothia C, Lesk AM. Structural determinants of the conformations of medium-sized loops in proteins. Proteins. 1989;6(4):382–394. [PubMed]
  • Tramontano A, Lesk AM. Common features of the conformations of antigen-binding loops in immunoglobulins and application to modeling loop conformations. Proteins. 1992 Jul;13(3):231–245. [PubMed]
  • Vajda S, Delisi C. Determining minimum energy conformations of polypeptides by dynamic programming. Biopolymers. 1990 Dec;29(14):1755–1772. [PubMed]
  • van Vlijmen HW, Karplus M. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 11;267(4):975–1001. [PubMed]
  • Vasmatzis G, Brower R, Delisi C. Predicting immunoglobulin-like hypervariable loops. Biopolymers. 1994 Dec;34(12):1669–1680. [PubMed]
  • Wang J, Kollman PA, Kuntz ID. Flexible ligand docking: a multistep strategy approach. Proteins. 1999 Jul 1;36(1):1–19. [PubMed]
  • Wei L, Huang ES, Altman RB. Are predicted structures good enough to preserve functional sites? Structure. 1999 Jun 15;7(6):643–650. [PubMed]
  • Wintjens RT, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Automatic classification and analysis of alpha alpha-turn motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jan 12;255(1):235–253. [PubMed]
  • Wojcik J, Mornon JP, Chomilier J. New efficient statistical sequence-dependent structure prediction of short to medium-sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jun 25;289(5):1469–1490. [PubMed]
  • Wu SJ, Dean DH. Functional significance of loops in the receptor binding domain of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIIIA delta-endotoxin. J Mol Biol. 1996 Feb 2;255(4):628–640. [PubMed]
  • Xu LZ, Sánchez R, Sali A, Heintz N. Ligand specificity of brain lipid-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1996 Oct 4;271(40):24711–24719. [PubMed]
  • Zheng Q, Kyle DJ. Multiple copy sampling: rigid versus flexible protein. Proteins. 1994 Aug;19(4):324–329. [PubMed]
  • Zheng Q, Kyle DJ. Accuracy and reliability of the scaling-relaxation method for loop closure: an evaluation based on extensive and multiple copy conformational samplings. Proteins. 1996 Feb;24(2):209–217. [PubMed]
  • Zheng Q, Rosenfeld R, DeLisi C, Kyle DJ. Multiple copy sampling in protein loop modeling: computational efficiency and sensitivity to dihedral angle perturbations. Protein Sci. 1994 Mar;3(3):493–506. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zheng Q, Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Determining protein loop conformation using scaling-relaxation techniques. Protein Sci. 1993 Aug;2(8):1242–1248. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...