• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of prosciprotein sciencecshl presssubscriptionsetoc alertsthe protein societyjournal home
Protein Sci. Jul 1996; 5(7): 1325–1338.
PMCID: PMC2143456

The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer?


Structurally similar but sequentially unrelated proteins have been discovered and rediscovered by many researchers, using a variety of structure comparison tools. For several pairs of such proteins, existing structural alignments obtained from the literature, as well as alignments prepared using several different similarity criteria, are compared with each other. It is shown that, in general, they differ from each other, with differences increasing with diminishing sequence similarity. Differences are particularly strong between alignments optimizing global similarity measures, such as RMS deviation between C alpha atoms, and alignments focusing on more local features, such as packing or interaction pattern similarity. Simply speaking, by putting emphasis on different aspects of structure, different structural alignments show the unquestionable similarity in a different way. With differences between various alignments extending to a point where they can differ at all positions, analysis of structural similarities leads to contradictory results reported by groups using different alignment techniques. The problem of uniqueness and stability of structural alignments is further studied with the help of visualization of the suboptimal alignments. It is shown that alignments are often degenerate and whole families of alignments can be generated with almost the same score as the "optimal alignment." However, for some similarity criteria, specially those based on side-chain positions, rather than C alpha positions, alignments in some areas of the protein are unique. This opens the question of how and if the structural alignments can be used as "standards of truth" for protein comparison.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.8M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):164–170. [PubMed]
  • Chothia C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature. 1992 Jun 18;357(6379):543–544. [PubMed]
  • Chothia C, Lesk AM. Evolution of proteins formed by beta-sheets. I. Plastocyanin and azurin. J Mol Biol. 1982 Sep 15;160(2):309–323. [PubMed]
  • Finkelstein AV, Ptitsyn OB. Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns? Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1987;50(3):171–190. [PubMed]
  • Fischer D, Bachar O, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. An efficient automated computer vision based technique for detection of three dimensional structural motifs in proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1992 Feb;9(4):769–789. [PubMed]
  • Fischer D, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. A 3D sequence-independent representation of the protein data bank. Protein Eng. 1995 Oct;8(10):981–997. [PubMed]
  • Gerstein M, Sonnhammer EL, Chothia C. Volume changes in protein evolution. J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 4;236(4):1067–1078. [PubMed]
  • Godzik A, Skolnick J. Flexible algorithm for direct multiple alignment of protein structures and sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Dec;10(6):587–596. [PubMed]
  • Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 5;227(1):227–238. [PubMed]
  • Godzik A, Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Regularities in interaction patterns of globular proteins. Protein Eng. 1993 Nov;6(8):801–810. [PubMed]
  • Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol. 1993 Sep 5;233(1):123–138. [PubMed]
  • Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 1992 Jul 2;358(6381):86–89. [PubMed]
  • Lesk AM, Chothia C. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J Mol Biol. 1980 Jan 25;136(3):225–270. [PubMed]
  • Orengo CA, Flores TP, Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. Recurring structural motifs in proteins with different functions. Curr Biol. 1993 Mar;3(3):131–139. [PubMed]
  • Russell RB, Barton GJ. Structural features can be unconserved in proteins with similar folds. An analysis of side-chain to side-chain contacts secondary structure and accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1994 Dec 2;244(3):332–350. [PubMed]
  • Russell RB, Barton GJ. Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins. 1992 Oct;14(2):309–323. [PubMed]
  • Sali A, Blundell TL. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J Mol Biol. 1990 Mar 20;212(2):403–428. [PubMed]
  • Saqi MA, Sternberg MJ. A simple method to generate non-trivial alternate alignments of protein sequences. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jun 20;219(4):727–732. [PubMed]
  • Vogt G, Etzold T, Argos P. An assessment of amino acid exchange matrices in aligning protein sequences: the twilight zone revisited. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jun 16;249(4):816–831. [PubMed]
  • Zuker M. Suboptimal sequence alignment in molecular biology. Alignment with error analysis. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 20;221(2):403–420. [PubMed]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...