• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of thoraxThoraxVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Thorax. Nov 2007; 62(11): 964–968.
Published online May 21, 2007. doi:  10.1136/thx.2006.072256
PMCID: PMC2117109

Survival of HIV‐infected patients in the intensive care unit in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Abstract

Background

Several studies have described improved outcomes for HIV‐infected patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A study was undertaken to examine the outcome from the ICU for HIV‐infected patients and to identify prognostic factors.

Methods

A retrospective study of HIV‐infected adults admitted to a university affiliated hospital ICU between January 1999 and December 2005 was performed. Information was collected on patient demographics, receipt of HAART (no patient began HAART on the ICU), reason for ICU admission and hospital course. Outcomes were survival to ICU discharge and to hospital discharge.

Results

102 patients had 113 admissions to the ICU; HIV infection was newly diagnosed in 31 patients. Survival (first episode ICU discharge and hospital discharge) was 77% and 68%, respectively, compared with 74% and 65% for general medical patients. ICU and hospital survival was 78% and 67% in those receiving HAART, and 75% and 66% in those who were not. In univariate analysis, factors associated with survival were: haemoglobin (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51, for an increase of 1 g/dl), CD4 count (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.58, for a 10‐fold increase in cells/µl), APACHE II score (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.90, for a 10 unit increase) and mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.83).

Conclusions

The outcome for HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU was good and was comparable to that in general medical patients. More than a quarter of patients had newly diagnosed HIV infection. Patients receiving HAART did not have a better outcome.

From the start of the HIV epidemic in the 1980s until the end of 2005, more than 78 400 infections had been diagnosed in the UK. While the number of new HIV infections diagnosed annually continues to rise to more than 7400 per year, the number of HIV‐related deaths has remained constant since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996. In 2005 an estimated 63 500 people were living with HIV infection in the UK.1

Since 1981, admission rates and intensive care unit (ICU) survival rates have fluctuated in HIV‐infected patients requiring critical care support.2 Early in the HIV epidemic, patients with HIV were deemed incurable. ICU death rates were high and long‐term survival rates were low.3,4,5 Excluding patients with HIV infection was perceived as justifiable by clinicians. As a direct result of HAART, in populations who are able to access it there has been a sustained reduction in HIV‐associated morbidity and mortality.6,7,8 HIV infection is now regarded as a chronic disease that may be controlled by HAART when, and if, it is available. Several studies have reported improved ICU outcomes for HIV‐infected patients in the HAART era.9,10,11,12,13,14

It was our perception that outcomes for HIV‐infected patients treated in our ICU were good. We thus performed a retrospective study of all HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU from January 1999 to the end of 2005 to identify admission patterns and outcomes in the post‐HAART era.

Methods

Patients

Consecutive HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU at University College London Hospitals (UCLH) between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005 were identified. HIV infection was either known or first diagnosed while in the ICU. Patients were identified from manual and electronic searches of hospital discharge summaries of HIV‐infected patients and cross‐referenced against the ICU electronic database. Adult patients without known HIV infection admitted to the ICU with general medical conditions between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005 were identified from the ICU electronic database; this group of patients was used to compare outcomes from intensive care. UCLH is a 936‐bed university affiliated teaching hospital with 22 general ICU beds that provides care for a large population of HIV‐infected patients. The study was carried out with the approval of the University College London Hospitals research ethics committee.

Data collection

Demographic information recorded included age, gender, ethnicity and risk factors for acquisition of HIV infection, as well as the patient's awareness of their HIV serostatus on admission to hospital and on admission to the ICU. Patient's receipt of HAART was noted. The final diagnosis made either at the time of death or discharge from the ICU was recorded. Haemoglobin and serum albumin levels were noted and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores on the day of admission to the ICU were calculated. Peripheral blood CD4 counts performed on or within 4 weeks before the ICU admission were also recorded. At this centre the HIV viral load is not normally measured in acutely unwell patients admitted to hospital, but results were available for some patients. No patient began HAART while on the ICU. The length of the ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation (and its duration) and development of pneumothorax (and whether pneumothorax occurred during mechanical ventilation) were recorded. Outcome was described either as death or survival to discharge from the ICU and to discharge from hospital.

Statistical analysis

Analysis is based on all 113 patient admissions to the ICU, although because of possible bias from inclusion of multiple admissions from some patients, survival rates are given also for first admissions only. All statistical testing was based on logistic regression, with outcome defined by the groups to be compared such as survivors and non‐survivors, and with robust standard errors to acknowledge the multiple admissions from some patients. For duration of ICU admission, duration of mechanical ventilation and CD4 count the log of the value was used in analysis owing to the skewed distribution of these factors. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Version 9 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

One hundred and two HIV‐infected patients were admitted to the ICU on 113 occasions. Nine patients had two admissions and one patient had three admissions. A median of 15 HIV‐infected patients per year (range 10–24) were admitted to the ICU. During the study period 1114 HIV‐infected patients were admitted to UCLH on 2089 occasions. The characteristics of patients with HIV infection admitted to the ICU are shown in table 11.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Characteristics of 102 HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU on 113 occasions from 1999 to 2005*

The median (IQR) APACHE II score in the first 24 h of the ICU admission was 18 (12–23) and the median (IQR) duration of the ICU stay was 3 (2–9) days in those who survived the ICU and 8 (3–14) days in those who died in the ICU. Survival to ICU discharge was 77% (79/102) and survival to hospital discharge was 68% for HIV‐infected patients with their first admission to the ICU. For all admissions of HIV‐infected patients to the ICU, survival to ICU discharge was 76% (86/113) and to hospital discharge was 66%.

ICU diagnoses

Lower respiratory tract infection accounted for 48% of admissions and neurological disease for 14% of admissions (table 22).). Of those with lower respiratory tract infection, 43 (80%) had acute lung injury (defined by Pao2/Fio2 ratio <40 kPa). The median (IQR) Pao2/Fio2 ratio was 17 (13.5–23) kPa. Most of the patients with acute lung injury had either Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) (n = 25; 58%) or bacterial pneumonia (n = 15; 35%). Survival in empirically diagnosed patients was worse than in those with microbiologically confirmed PCP. In mechanically ventilated patients, ICU survival was 69% and hospital survival was 63%. In patients who were not mechanically ventilated, ICU survival was 88% and hospital survival was 72%. Eight of 12 patients with pneumothorax had PCP, two had bacterial pneumonia and two had neurological infection. All patients (except one with PCP) were mechanically ventilated when pneumothorax occurred.

Table thumbnail
Table 2 Diagnoses and survival in 102 HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU on 113 occasions

The majority of ICU admissions in this HIV‐infected cohort were due to community‐acquired and opportunistic infections; however, sepsis related to chemotherapy administered for treatment of malignancy (lymphoma 3; Castleman disease 1) was responsible for four admissions. The in‐ICU mortality in this small group was 50%. Seven admissions (five patients) resulted from complications of chronic liver disease (variceal haemorrhage 5; hepatic encephalopathy 2) caused by co‐infection with hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C. Of these patients, 80% died in the ICU.

Diagnoses were HIV‐associated in 76 episodes (67%). Patients admitted to the ICU with non‐HIV‐related diagnoses had higher median CD4 cell counts than those with HIV‐related disease (260 vs 40 cells/μl; p = 0.08). This probably reflects the fact that a greater number of those with non‐HIV‐related diagnoses were receiving HAART (57% vs 28%; p = 0.005).

At the time of ICU admission the median (IQR) APACHE II scores were similar in patients with and without HIV‐related diagnoses (16 (11–23) and 18 (13–23), respectively), suggesting similar severities of critical illness. The median serum albumin level was lower in those with HIV‐related disease than in those without HIV‐related disease (23 vs 28 g/l; p = 0.001). While the need for mechanical ventilation was identical (62%) among patients with and without non‐HIV‐related illness, the group with HIV‐related illness required mechanical ventilation for a longer period (median (IQR) 8 (3–18) days vs 2 (1–6) days; p = 0.002). Similarly, the median (IQR) duration of ICU admission among those who survived was longer in those with HIV‐related disease than in those without HIV‐related disease (2 (1–4) days vs 5 (3–15) days; p = 0.006).

ICU survival was similar in patients with both HIV‐related and non‐HIV‐related problems (74% and 81%, respectively; p = 0.39). Survival to hospital discharge was not significantly different in those with HIV‐related illness (61%) and in those with non‐HIV‐related disease (76%, p = 0.15).

Use of HAART

On 42 occasions patients were receiving HAART on admission to the ICU. HIV viral loads were measured in 21 patients and were undetectable in 15, [less-than-or-eq, slant]1000 copies/ml in 4 patients and >1000 copies/ml in 2. Median CD4 cell counts were significantly lower in those not receiving HAART (50 vs 150 cells/μl, p = 0.02). Distribution of gender, ethnicity and likely route of HIV acquisition were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation or in the duration of mechanical ventilation in those who were and were not receiving HAART. Survival to ICU discharge in patients who were or were not receiving HAART was similar (78% vs 75%, p = 0.63). Likewise, survival to hospital discharge in those receiving HAART was 67% and 66% in those who were not.

Two patients had immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) having recently commenced HAART. One, with pulmonary tuberculosis, presented with massive mediastinal lymphadenopathy causing stridor; the other, with PCP, had IRIS‐induced respiratory failure. Two patients had HAART‐related lactic acidosis; both were receiving didanosine.

Patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection

Thirty‐one patients had newly diagnosed HIV infection. HIV was first diagnosed after hospitalisation, immediately before admission to the ICU in 17 patients and after ICU admission in 14 (table 33).). The most frequently encountered illnesses were PCP (58%) and tuberculosis (13%). Compared with patients with known HIV infection, those with newly diagnosed HIV infection were more immune suppressed (median CD4 count 20 vs 120 cells/μl; p = 0.02) and had a lower serum albumin level (median 22 vs 25 g/l; p = 0.002). Their ICU admission, if they survived, was also longer (median 6 vs 3 days; p = 0.003) and, if mechanically ventilated, required support for longer (median 11 vs 4 days; p = 0.003).

Table thumbnail
Table 3 Characteristics of 31 patients with a diagnosis of HIV infection made just before or subsequent to admission to the ICU

General medical patients without known HIV infection

During the study period an additional 1346 patients without known HIV infection and who had general medical conditions were admitted to the ICU on 1484 occasions. Their median (IQR) age was 61 (36–71) years and their median (IQR) APACHE II score was 18 (13–24). The overall median (IQR) length of stay in the ICU was 2 (1–5) days. Reasons for admission to the ICU were respiratory disease (429 episodes, 28.9%; 195 pneumonia, 50 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 50 acute severe asthma 50, 84 miscellaneous); cardiovascular disease (314 episodes, 21.2%; 140 dysrythmias, 65 ventricular failure, 58 myocardial infarction, 15 pulmonary embolus, 12 unstable angina, 24 miscellaneous); neurological disease (184 episodes, 12.4%; 93 status epilepticus, 23 intracerebral bleed, 15 subarachnoid haemorrhage, 53 miscellaneous); drug/alcohol overdose (149 episodes, 10%); gastrointestinal (GI) disease (113 episodes, 7.6%; 26 lower GI bleed, 24 oesophageal varices, 23 upper GI bleed, 40 miscellaneous); infection (75 episodes, 5.1%; 68 septic shock, 7 miscellaneous); metabolic (67 episodes, 4.5%; 46 diabetic ketoacidosis, 18 hyponatraemia, 3 miscellaneous); acute renal failure (50 episodes, 3.4%) and miscellaneous (103 episodes, 6.9%). Among these general medical patients, first episode ICU survival was 74% and hospital survival was 65%; overall ICU survival was 76% and survival to hospital discharge was 66%.

Predictors of survival in HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU

In univariate analysis, factors predicting survival to ICU discharge were haemoglobin (odds ratio (OR) = 1.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.51) for a 1 g/dl increase, p = 0.02), CD4 cell count (OR = 1.59 (95% CI 0.98 to 2.58) for a 10‐fold increase in cells/µl, p = 0.06), APACHE II score (OR = 0.51 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.90) for a 10 unit increase, p = 0.02) and mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.29 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.83), p = 0.02). Patients' age, gender, ethnicity, HIV risk factor, awareness of their HIV status before admission, receipt of HAART, admission to the ICU with an HIV‐associated diagnosis, albumin, Pao2/Fio2 ratio >40 and development of pneumothorax were not associated with survival. In multivariate analysis the strength of all associations was reduced and no factors were found to be significant.

Discussion

In this study of HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU, survival to ICU discharge was 77% and survival to hospital discharge was 68% for first admissions; the equivalent figures for all admissions were 76% and 66%, respectively, and 67% were admitted with HIV‐related illnesses. By contrast, over the same time period (first episode) ICU and hospital survival for general medical admissions to the ICU was 74% and 65%, respectively, and overall ICU and hospital survival was 76 and 66%, respectively. Although univariate analysis identified that haemoglobin, CD4 cell count, APACHE II score and need for mechanical ventilation predicted ICU survival of HIV‐infected patients, multivariate analysis showed that no factor remained associated with survival, so we do not view any of these four factors as having a dominant association. Two groups with particularly poor survival following admission to the ICU were those with complications of chronic liver disease caused by hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C co‐infection, and those with sepsis related to chemotherapy for treatment of HIV‐related malignancy. However, these groups are small when compared with all HIV admissions to the ICU and the apparent poor outcome may be similar to that seen early in the AIDS epidemic with management of PCP before clinicians gained expertise in management of severe disease.

This study found no difference in ICU survival between those admitted with and without HIV‐related disease. Over the past decade antiretroviral therapy has revolutionised the management of HIV infection, reducing disease progression and improving long‐term survival.6,7 The improvement in the survival of HIV‐infected patients in the ICU has been ascribed to the availability of HAART.9 Our data show no evidence that HAART improves either ICU or hospital survival. However, only 37% of patients in this study were receiving HAART on admission to the ICU; among those patients in whom HIV viral loads were measured, values were undetectable in the majority and low in the rest, suggesting that these patients were taking HAART and were gaining some immunological benefit. By contrast, 25% of patients were receiving HAART in a study from the San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH).9 It is possible that the beneficial effects of HAART are negated by the greater severity of critical illness, as suggested by higher median APACHE II scores (24 vs 16) in our patient cohort compared with those reported from SFGH.9 In addition, differences between our patient group and that from SFGH may explain these contradictory findings. Almost twice as many of our patients (67%) were admitted to the ICU with HIV attributable disease compared with 37% in SFGH. We recently described improved survival of critically ill HIV‐infected patients in our institution attributable to advances in care of the critically ill, particularly the adoption of protective ventilation strategies.15 While HAART is undoubtedly effective, it is potentially toxic16,17,18,19 and may precipitate life‐threatening IRIS.

The major limitations of this study are its retrospective nature, the relatively small sample size and acquisition of data from a single centre. In addition, variability in ICU admission policies over the study period is a further confounder. This is unlikely as there were no changes in ICU admission policy. While no data are held on HIV‐infected patients who were refused admission to the ICU on the grounds of physician‐perceived futility, this group is likely to be small.

In the past decade the epidemiology of HIV infection in the UK has changed, with a greater number of cases diagnosed in those born overseas (particularly in sub‐Saharan Africa) who acquired infection by heterosexual contact.1 This is reflected in the change in demographics seen in the HIV‐infected population admitted to this ICU since the mid 1990s.20 The proportion of black Africans has increased from 14.3% to 42.5%, and the number of HIV infections attributable to heterosexual contact from 15% to 50%. Of note, the proportion of admissions related to intravenous drug use has remained constant at 10–11%. Comparison of HIV‐infected patients admitted to ICUs in London in the mid 1990s20 with the present cohort shows an improvement in survival rates. A decade ago ICU and hospital survival rates of 67% and 44% were reported;20 by comparison, in the present study we report overall ICU and hospital survival rates of 76% and 68%, respectively. This improvement is similar to ICU and hospital survival rates of 70–77% and 61–71%, respectively, reported from other centres.9,10,11,12,13,21,22 However, care is needed when making comparisons between institutions, given differences in HIV‐infected population demographics and variations in ICU admission criteria and clinical practice.

We found the most frequent cause of ICU admission was lower respiratory tract infection (48%), complicated by acute lung injury in 80% of cases; PCP was the major cause and the outcome was worse in those with empirically diagnosed infection.15 While opportunistic and community‐acquired infection continues to predominate, the spectrum of disease is evolving. The emergence of HIV‐infected patients with end‐stage liver disease caused by co‐infection with hepatotropic viruses and those undergoing aggressive chemotherapy for malignancy will in future impact increasingly upon ICU resources. Given the apparent high mortality among this group of patients admitted to the ICU, issues of treatment futility and cost‐benefit are germane.

The Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme of 129 647 patients admitted to general ICUs in the UK reported ICU and hospital survival rates of 79.7% and 71.4%, respectively.23 These data compare favourably with outcomes in our study. The median APACHE II score of the ICNARC group (16.5) was similar to that of our HIV‐infected cohort (18), suggesting a similar illness severity,23 although there was a clear age difference (median age 39 vs 63 years in the ICNARC cohort).

In common with studies from several centres in North America and Europe,9,10,11,12,22 HIV infection was first diagnosed in the ICU in a proportion of patients in our study. A recent audit of deaths among HIV‐infected adults carried out by the British HIV Association identified that >20% of deaths in 2005 were in individuals in whom HIV infection was diagnosed too late for effective treatment.24 These data underscore the need for development of strategies to encourage individuals to undergo HIV testing in order to obviate the need for ICU and its attendant costs.

In the light of the evolution of the HIV epidemic in UK and its continuing demand on critical care services, it is important to ascertain the cost‐benefit ratio of ICU support for critically ill HIV‐infected patients. Long‐term outcomes for ICU survivors in both quantitative and qualitative terms are vital in guiding such decisions.25 In a recent study from Paris, survival rates among HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU in the HAART era were 85.3% and 70.8% at 12 and 24 months, respectively.12 No studies have described longer follow‐up for HIV‐infected ICU survivors and none have addressed qualitative issues.

In summary, this study shows that HIV‐infected patients admitted to the ICU in the HAART era have outcomes comparable with those of general medical patients. Over a quarter of patients had HIV infection newly diagnosed either just before or during the ICU admission. Patients receiving HAART did not have a better outcome. Physicians and intensivists should be aware of the complications of HIV infection that may result in admission of HIV‐infected patients to the ICU.

Abbreviations

HAART - highly active antiretroviral therapy

ICU - intensive care unit

IRIS - immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

PCP - Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia

Footnotes

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: Professor R F Miller is Co‐Editor and Dr A J Copas is Associate Editor (Statistics) of Sexually Transmitted Infections, part of the BMJ Publishing Group.

References

1. Health Protection Agency A complex picture – HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom: 2006. London: The UK Collaborative Group for HIV and STI Surveillance, Health Protection Agency, http://www.hpa.org.uk/publications/2006/hiv_sti_2006/contents.htm (accessed 5 March 2007)
2. Morris A, Creasman J, Turner J. et al Intensive care of human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients during the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002. 166262–267.267 [PubMed]
3. Wachter R M, Luce J M, Turner J. et al Intensive care of patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Outcome and changing patterns of utilization. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986. 134891–896.896 [PubMed]
4. Schein R M, Fischl M A, Pitchenik A. et al ICU survival of patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Crit Care Med 1986. 141026–1027.1027 [PubMed]
5. Smith R L, Levine S M, Lewis M L. Prognosis of patients with AIDS requiring intensive care. Chest 1989. 96857–861.861 [PubMed]
6. Palella F J, Delaney K M, Moorman A C. et al Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection: HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998. 338853–860.860 [PubMed]
7. Valdez H, Chowdhry T K, Asaad R. et al Changing spectrum of mortality due to human immunodeficiency virus: analysis of 260 deaths during 1995–1999. Clin Infect Dis 2001. 321487–1493.1493 [PubMed]
8. Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C. et al Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet 2003. 36222–29.29 [PubMed]
9. Morris A, Wachter R M, Luce J. et al Improved survival with highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV‐infected patients with severe Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. AIDS 2003. 1773–80.80 [PubMed]
10. Narasimhan M, Posner A J, DePalo V A. et al Intensive care in patients with HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Chest 2004. 1251800–1804.1804 [PubMed]
11. Vincent B, Timsit J F, Auburtin M. et al Characteristics and outcomes of HIV‐infected patients in the ICU. Impact of the highly active antiretroviral treatment era. Intensive Care Med 2004. 30859–866.866 [PubMed]
12. Casalino E, Wolff M, Ravaud P. et al Impact of HAART advent on admission patterns and survival in HIV‐infected patients admitted to an intensive care unit. AIDS 2004. 181429–1433.1433 [PubMed]
13. Khouli H, Afrasiabi A, Shibli M. et al Outcome of critically ill human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Intensive Care Med 2005. 20327–333.333 [PubMed]
14. Palacios R, Hildalgo A, Reina C. et al Effect of antiretroviral therapy on admissions of HIV‐infected patients to an intensive care unit. HIV Med 2006. 7193–196.196 [PubMed]
15. Miller R F, Allen E, Copas A. et al Improved survival for HIV infected patients with severe Pneumocystis jirovecii is independent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Thorax 2006. 61716–721.721 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Dean G, Williams D I, Churchill D R. et al Transient clinical deterioration in HIV patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia after starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: another case of immune restoration inflammatory syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002. 1651671–1672.1672 [PubMed]
17. Wislez M, Bergot, Antoine M. et al Acute respiratory failure following HAART introduction in patients treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002. 164847–855.855 [PubMed]
18. Masur H. Management of patients with HIV in the intensive care unit. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006. 396–102.102 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Huang L, Quartain A, Jones D. et al Intensive care of patients with HIV infection. N Engl J Med 2006. 355173–181.181 [PubMed]
20. Gill J K, Greene L, Miller R. et al ICU admission in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus – a multicentre survey. Anaesthesia 1999. 54727–732.732 [PubMed]
21. Nickas G, Wachter R M. Outcomes of intensive care for patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Intern Med 2000. 160541–547.547 [PubMed]
22. Afessa B, Green B. Clinical course, prognostic factors, and outcome prediction for HIV patients in the ICU. The PIP (Pulmonary complications, ICU support, and prognostic factors in hospitalized patients with HIV) study. Chest 2000. 118138–145.145 [PubMed]
23. Harrison D A, Brady A R, Rowan K. Case mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the intensive care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme database. Crit Care 2004. 8R99–111.111 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. British HIV Association (BHIVA) http://www.bhiva‐clinical‐audit.org.uk (accessed 28 February 2007)
25. Williams T A, Dobb G J, Finn J C. et al Long‐term survival from intensive care: a review. Intensive Care Med 2005. 311306–1315.1315 [PubMed]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...