• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
Ann Rheum Dis. Nov 2007; 66(11): 1508–1512.
Published online Apr 19, 2007. doi:  10.1136/ard.2007.070839
PMCID: PMC2111640

Bone mineral density in patients with recently diagnosed, active rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Objectives

Osteoporosis is a well‐known extra‐articular phenomenon in patients with uncontrolled, long‐standing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the present study, the extent of osteoporosis and reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and the disease‐related and demographic factors that are associated with osteoporosis and reduced BMD were examined in patients with recently diagnosed, active RA.

Methods

BMD of the total hip and the lumbar spine was measured using dual‐energy x ray absorptiometry in 381 patients with recently diagnosed active RA, who had never been treated with DMARDs or corticosteroids. Osteoporosis was defined as a T score [less-than-or-eq, slant]−2.5 SD and reduced BMD as Z score [less-than-or-eq, slant]−1 SD. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect associations of osteoporosis and reduced BMD with disease activity, functional disability, joint damage (Sharp–van der Heijde score) and demographic factors.

Results

Osteoporosis and reduced BMD were found in the spine and/or the hip in 11% and 25%, respectively, of the patients. Longer symptom duration and presence of rheumatoid factor (RF) were the only RA‐specific markers for osteoporosis and reduced BMD. Further, postmenopausal status in women, a low body mass index, familial osteoporosis, and, remarkably, male gender, were independently associated with osteoporosis and reduced BMD.

Conclusion

In patients with recently diagnosed active RA who had never been treated with DMARDs or corticosteroids, BMD seems to be well‐preserved and predominantly related to demographic factors. Longer symptom duration and a positive RF, but not higher disease activity or more joint damage, were related to osteoporosis and reduced BMD.

Keywords: early rheumatoid arthritis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis

Generalised osteoporosis is a well‐known extra‐articular complication in uncontrolled, long‐standing rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1,2,3 Underlining the clinical significance of low bone mineral density (BMD) in RA, the risk of hip4,5,6 and vertebral fractures6,7,8 and the associated morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs are increased in patients with RA.

It is thought that the pathogenesis of both periarticular and generalised osteoporosis and local bone erosions share common pathways.9 This hypothesis has been strengthened by the discovery that osteoclasts, stimulated mostly by the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) pathway, play a central role in all of these processes.10,11,12 A clinical study on patients with early, untreated RA showed that the baseline ratio of RANKL to osteoprotegerin (its natural decoy receptor) is independently predictive for joint damage progression after 5 years of follow‐up.13

Over the past few years, the extent of osteoporosis in patients with established RA has been clarified. The overall occurrence of generalised osteoporosis in patients with long‐standing RA ranges from 7% to 26% in the hip and 19% to 32% in the spine.14,15,16,17,18,19 In a population‐based study of patients with established RA, a twofold increase in osteoporosis was seen in 394 women19 and a twofold increase of reduced BMD in men,20 compared with control groups. Previous studies, performed with patients with established RA, reported disease‐related factors, such as long disease duration, high disease activity, joint damage, functional disability and corticosteroid use, as determinants of osteoporosis or reduced BMD.14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 Hence, patients with long‐standing RA with destructive disease, functional disability or immobilisation, or who are on long‐term corticosteroid treatment are at high risk for osteoporosis.23

Only a few studies focusing on BMD in patients with early RA have been performed; however the disease duration in some was up to 5 years.24,25,26 Very little is known about the extent of osteoporosis and the influence of disease‐associated factors on BMD in patients with recently diagnosed RA.27,28 These data are required in order to unravel the common mechanisms between generalised osteoporosis and RA.

In this paper we present data from the Behandel Strategieen (BeSt) study, a multicentre, randomised clinical trial with a large cohort of patients with recently diagnosed, active, RA, who had never been treated with DMARDs or corticosteroids.29 We evaluated the frequency of osteoporosis in the lumbar spine and total hip and studied the influence of disease and demographic factors on osteoporosis and reduced BMD in recent onset RA that might indicate a common pathway between rheumatoid inflammation and generalised osteoporosis.

Patients and methods

Study design

All measurements were performed in the setting of the BeSt study.29 This was a multicentre, randomised clinical trial designed to compare the effectiveness of four different treatment strategies in patients with recently diagnosed, active RA. The BeSt study was conducted by rheumatologists participating in the Foundation for Applied Rheumatology Research in 18 peripheral and 2 university hospitals in the western part of the Netherlands. The medical ethics committee at each participating centre approved the study protocol and all patients gave written informed consent prior to participation in the study.

In total, 508 patients who met the definition of RA as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria, were included in the trial. Other inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years, symptom duration <2 years, and active disease with [gt-or-equal, slanted]6 swollen joints out of 66 possible and [gt-or-equal, slanted]6 tender joints out of 68 possible, and either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate [gt-or-equal, slanted]28 mm/hour or a score on the Visual Analogue Scale for Global Health, reported by the patient, of [gt-or-equal, slanted]20 mm on a scale of 0–100 mm (0, best; 100, worst). Exclusion criteria were previous treatment with DMARDs other than antimalarials, concomitant treatment with an experimental drug, malignancy within the previous 5–6 years, bone marrow hypoplasia, levels of serum liver enzymes (aspartate/alanine aminotransferases) >3 times the upper limit of normal, serum creatinine >150 mmol/l or estimated creatinine clearance <75%, diabetes mellitus, alcohol and/or drug misuse, pregnancy, planning conception during the study period or inadequate contraception.

BMD measurements

In 381 patients, BMD of the lumbar spine (L2–L4 anteroposterior view) and total hip was measured at baseline in 14 of 20 centres participating in the BeSt trial, in which dual energy x ray absorptiometry was available. The BMD measurements were carried out using a densitometer (Hologic 4500 QDR (Hologic, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) in eight centres and a Lunar DPX‐L (Lunar, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) in six centres). Osteoporosis, defined as T score (number of SD from the mean of young, healthy perople) [less-than-or-eq, slant]−2.5 SD and reduced BMD, defined as Z score (number of SD from the mean of healthy age‐matched and gender‐matched people) [less-than-or-eq, slant]−1 SD were determined according to locally used reference populations provided by the manufacturers. In the centres with Lunar equipment, the UK or US spine and hip references were used, and in centres with Hologic equipment, the Hologic spine reference group and the National Health and Examination Survey femur reference population were used. Absolute values of BMD, measured with the two densitometers, are not comparable because of calibration differences.30 However, if there are no differences in the mean T and Z scores between the different equipments and reference populations, the two measurement methods are probably reliable and interchangeable.31

Demographic and clinical variables

Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained partly by self‐report questionnaires and partly by interview and clinical examinations that were performed by specially trained research nurses. The following variables were collected: age, gender, race, height, weight, symptom duration, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, age at menopause and premature menopause (<40 years), current smoking and alcohol status, previous clinical fractures, osteoporosis in first‐degree relatives, estimated daily calcium intake and use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and bisphosphonates. Disease assessment was made using the Disease Activity Score (DAS), based on the number of swollen joints and the Ritchie Articular Index for pain in tender joints, the visual analogue scale for patient global assessment of disease activity (0–100 mm) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Functional ability as measured by the Dutch validated Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and laboratory tests (C‐reactive protein (CRP), 25‐OH vitamin D level and serum IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), defined as positive or negative according to locally applied assays and cut‐off points) were obtained. Radiographic joint damage according to the Sharp–van der Heijde score was rated independently by two physicians, who remained blinded to patient‐specific data and treatment group, was assessed. The intraobserver coefficients were 0.93 and 0.94, and the interobserver coefficient was 0.93. For this study, the mean of the baseline scores of the two assessors was used for analysis. A patient was classified as having erosive disease if the mean erosion score was >0.5.

Statistical analysis

The demographic and disease‐related variables in relation to the occurrence of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in the different measurement sites were analysed by regression analyses adjusted for possible confounders. Potential contribution of the variables, as independent risk factors of osteoporosis or reduced BMD, was evaluated by stepwise multivariate regression analyses, performed as forward (conditional) procedures. All results were adjusted for age, gender, race, menopausal status, current smoking and alcohol status, except adjustment for themselves. Additionally, symptom duration, joint damage, RF status, DAS and HAQ were adjusted for each other. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) obtained by regression analyses were corrected into relative risks using the formula of Zhang et al to interpret the magnitude of the associations more appropriately.32 All tests were two‐tailed and p[less-than-or-eq, slant]0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

BMD measurements were available for 381 patients: lumbar spine for 378, left total hip for 329 and right total hip for 30 patients. For 22 patients, no total hip measurement was performed; two of these due to bilateral hip prosthesis and others due to logistic reasons. Three patients did not have spine measurements taken.

Table 11 shows the characteristics of the 381 patients with BMD measurements. There were no significant differences in the demographic and disease variables between the group of patients with BMD measurements and the group without BMD measurements (n = 127) (data not shown). There were no significant differences in the mean T and Z scores and in the frequencies of osteoporosis and reduced BMD as a result of measurements with different equipments and references (data not shown). The study population consisted mainly of postmenopausal women, aged 55 years, with recent onset RA and median symptom duration of 23 weeks. All patients had active disease with a mean (SD) DAS of 4.4 (0.9), and 72% of the patients had erosive disease. The mean calcium intake per day was 926 mg, and 7% and 2% of the patients received calcium and vitamin D supplements, respectively. Five patients (1%) used bisphosphonates and 21% of the women (had) used HRT. The mean T score was −0.4 SD and the mean Z score was 0.3 SD in both the hip and the spine.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Demographic, laboratory and clinical characteristics of the 381 patients who received BMD measurement

Prevalence of osteoporosis/reduced BMD

The overall frequency of osteoporosis was 9% in the spine, 4% in the total hip and 11% in either the spine or the hip. The proportion of all patients having reduced BMD was 19% for the spine, 14% for the hip and 25% for either the spine or the hip (table 22).). More men than women had reduced BMD and more postmenopausal than premenopausal women had osteoporosis in the measured sites. With increasing age, the frequency of osteoporosis and reduced BMD also increased, except for the highest age group.

Table thumbnail
Table 2 Prevalence of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in the spine L2–4, total left hip or either

Determinants of osteoporosis/reduced BMD

All variables listed in table 11 were entered into regression analyses and adjusted for possible confounders. Longer symptom duration before inclusion was associated with osteoporosis and reduced BMD in the hip and the presence of RF was associated with reduced BMD in the spine. DAS, HAQ and SHS were not related to osteoporosis or reduced BMD in the spine or the hip (table 33).). Postmenopausal status, a low BMI and current smoking were associated with osteoporosis, and male gender, a low BMI, familial (first‐degree relative) osteoporosis and current smoking were associated with reduced BMD in the measured sites (data not shown). Variables that showed significant associations in the regression analyses, adjusted for possible confounders, were entered into a multiple regression analyses. Longer symptom duration and positive RF were independently associated with osteoporosis and reduced BMD in the hip and with reduced BMD in the spine, respectively. Postmenopausal status and low BMI remained related with osteoporosis in the spine or the hip. Male gender, low BMI and familial osteoporosis were independently associated with reduced BMD in the spine or the hip (table 44).

Table thumbnail
Table 3 Regression analysis of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in the spine and the hip (dependent variables) and disease variables (independent variables)
Table thumbnail
Table 4 Multivariate regression analysis of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in the spine and the hip (dependent variables) and demographic and disease variables (independent variables)

Discussion

In this large cross‐sectional study, we examined BMD in a large group of patients with recent onset, active RA, who had never been treated with DMARDs or corticosteroids. We found that approximately 11% of both men and women with RA had an osteoporosis (T score [less-than-or-eq, slant]−2.5 SD) and 32% of the men with RA and 22% of the women with RA had reduced BMD (Z score [less-than-or-eq, slant]−1 SD). The independent disease‐related determinants of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in these patients were longer symptom duration and the presence of RF.

Because the prevalence of osteoporosis is dependent on many population‐specific factors, such as genetics, race, age and gender, it is important to compare our data on the prevalence of osteoporosis with data in the general Dutch population. Versluis et al showed in a cohort of 449 Dutch postmenopausal women, with a mean age of 67 years, that osteoporosis was present in the femoral neck in 7%, which is in accordance with our results (osteoporosis in the hip in 6% of postmenopausal women, mean age 61 years).33 In addition, Smeets‐Goevaers showed the presence of osteoporosis in the lumbar spine in 13% of 1079 Dutch postmenopausal women with a mean age of 51 years, which matches the prevalence of osteoporosis in the spine in our postmenopausal women (12%).34 These agreements might suggest that the prevalence of osteoporosis in our patients with recently diagnosed, untreated RA is not increased compared with the general Dutch population; however, comparison of these populations should be treated with caution, owing to differences in demographic characteristics, especially in age. In accordance with our results, Keller et al showed in 227 patients with RA with a mean disease duration of 6 months, who had never been treated with DMARDs, that BMD values did not differ significantly between patients with RA and controls.27 However, the proportion of patients with reduced BMD (Z score [less-than-or-eq, slant]−1 SD; 45% of women and 51% of men) was higher than in the reference population (16%), even in this early stage of the disease. Unfortunately, no data exist on the prevalence of reduced BMD in the general Dutch population; however, compared with the population of Keller et al, reduced BMD in our population seems to be less frequent (32% of men and 22% of women). In addition, Forslind et al showed in 134 women with RA with mean disease duration of 6 months, who had never been treated with DMARDs, that BMD was similar to that of age‐matched controls, whereas the BMD in the 70 men with RA was lower than the controls.28 Hence, despite the poor prognostic markers in our study, with RF present in 64% and erosions in 72% of the patients after a median symptom duration of 23 weeks, BMD is fairly well preserved in the very early stages of the disease. This could be explained by the fact that generalised osteoporosis is more associated with long‐standing, destructive and disabling RA,35 whereas early RA is associated with periarticular osteoporosis.3 This is further supported by the fact that longer symptom duration is independently associated with more generalised osteoporosis in studies, including the present one.14 In contrast, other studies have found lower BMD in patients with early RA than in the reference population.24,25,26 However, in these studies, methodological aspects varied, such as the sample size, the selection of patients (with disease duration up to 5 years) and the (non‐)treatment of RA and osteoporosis. In our study, none of the patients had been treated for RA (at baseline) and only 5 of the 381 patients had been using bisphosphonates for a few months, which did not affect the analyses.

Symptom duration and the presence of RF were the only RA‐specific markers for osteoporosis and reduced BMD in this study. It is known that seropositive RA is associated with more aggressive joint disease and is more commonly complicated by extra‐articular manifestations than is seronegative RA.36,37,38,39,40 Previous studies showed an independent association between the presence of RF and osteoporosis or reduced BMD in established and recent onset RA.20,27 This suggests that there might be a common pathway between (future) local bone involvement in RA and generalised osteoporosis with osteoclasts, stimulated mostly by the RANKL pathway playing a crucial role in the pathogenesis.11,12,13 However, although joint damage, disease activity and functional disability were related to lower BMD in several studies of patients with established14,15,17,18,19 and early24,25,26 RA, these were not associated with osteoporosis or reduced BMD in the present study of patients with recently diagnosed RA. This could be explained by the very short disease duration of our patients, and follow‐up might reveal associations between these disease‐related variables and BMD.

In agreement with previous studies, osteoporosis and reduced BMD were independently associated with the well‐known risk factors of low BMI, postmenopausal status and familial osteoporosis.1,14,16,17,18,19,41 In this study, we also, remarkably, found greater reduction in BMD in the spine in men than in women. After adjustment was made for confounders, such as menopausal status for women, age was not associated with osteoporosis or reduced BMD in both men and women. However, it was remarkable that the highest age group had a lower prevalence of BMD reduction than the younger groups. This could be due to degenerative changes in the lumbar spine, the smaller number of patients and selection of the fittest patients.

In our large cohort of patients with early, active and mostly erosive RA, who had never been treated with DMARDs or corticosteroids, we found that longer symptom duration and the presence of RF, predictive for aggressive joint disease, was associated with osteoporosis and reduced BMD, suggesting that these events might share a common pathway. However, a comparison with Dutch population‐based cohorts suggests that the prevalence of osteoporosis in our patients overlaps with that of the Dutch population, indicating that generalised osteoporosis in recently diagnosed RA is predominantly related to the well‐known risk factors unrelated to disease, such as postmenopausal status, presence of familial osteoporosis and a low BMI. Further studies will be performed in the BeSt cohort to evaluate the effect of disease activity, joint damage progression and antirheumatic medication, including the use of corticosteroids and TNF inhibitors, on BMD loss.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the patients as well as the following rheumatologists (other than the authors) who participated in the Foundation for Applied Rheumatology Research (all locations are in The Netherlands): W M de Beus, MD (Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague); M H W de Bois, MD (Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague); G Collée, MD (Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague); J A P M Ewals, MD (Haga Hospital, The Hague); A H Gerards, MD (Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam); B A M Grillet, MD (De Honte Hospital, Terneuzen); J H L M van Groenendael, MD (Franciscus Hospital, Roosendaal); K H Han, MD (Medical Center Rijnmond‐Zuid, Rotterdam); J M W Hazes, MD (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam); H M J Hulsmans, MD (Haga Hospital, The Hague); M H de Jager, MD (Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht); P J S M Kerstens, MD (Jan van Breemen Institute, Amsterdam); M V van Krugten, MD (Walcheren Hospital, Vlissingen); H van der Leeden, MD (retired); M F van Lieshout‐Zuidema, MD (Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp); A Linssen, MD (Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem); P A H M van der Lubbe, MD (Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam); C Mallée, MD (Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem); H K Markusse, MD (deceased); D van Schaardenburg, MD (VU Medical Center, Amsterdam and Jan van Breemen Institute, Amsterdam); P E H Seys, MD (Lievensberg Hospital, Bergen op Zoom); R M van Soesbergen, MD (retired); P B J de Sonnaville, MD (Oosterschelde Hospital, Goes); I Speyer, MD (Bronovo Hospital, The Hague); J Ph Terwiel, MD (Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp); A E Voskuyl, MD (VU Medical Center, Amsterdam); M L Westedt, MD (Bronovo Hospital, The Hague); S ten Wolde, MD (Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem); D van Zeben, MD (Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam). We would also like to thank all other rheumatologists and trainee rheumatologists who enrolled patients in this study, A H Zwinderman for his statistical advice and J C Roos for his advice about the measurement methods for bone mineral density.

Abbreviations

BeSt - Behandel Strategieen

BMD - bone mineral density

BMI - body mass index

CRP - C‐reactive protein

DAS - Disease Activity Score

DMARD - disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug

HAQ - Health Assessment Questionnaire

HRT - hormone replacement therapy

RA - rheumatoid arthritis

RANKL - receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand

RF - rheumatoid factor

Footnotes

The BeSt trial was supported by a grant of the Dutch College for Health Insurance Companies (CVZ). Schering‐Plough and Centocor provided additional funding. The funding sources were not involved in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Competing interests: Professor Dr F C Breedveld was paid for expert testimony for Centocor in 1996 and was a paid speaker in a Schering‐Plough‐sponsored symposium. Dr C F Allaart was a paid speaker in a Schering‐Plough‐sponsored symposium in 2006.

References

1. Deodhar A A, Woolf A D. Bone mass measurement and bone metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Br J Rheumatol 1996. 35309–322.322 [PubMed]
2. Westhovens R, Dequeker J. Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. Z Rheumatol 2000. 59(suppl 1)33–38.38 [PubMed]
3. Green M J, Deodhar A A. Bone changes in early rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001. 15105–123.123 [PubMed]
4. Cooper C, Coupland C, Mitchell M. Rheumatoid arthritis, corticosteroid therapy and hip fracture. Ann Rheum Dis 1995. 5449–52.52 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Huusko T M, Korpela M, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R. Threefold increased risk of hip fractures with rheumatoid arthritis in Central Finland. Ann Rheum Dis 2001. 60521–522.522 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Van Staa T P, Geusens P, Bijlsma J W J, Leufkens H G M, Cooper C. Clinical assessment of the long‐term risk of fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006. 543104–3112.3112 [PubMed]
7. Spector T D, Hall G M, McCloskey E V, Kanis J A. Risk of vertebral fracture in women with rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ 1993. 306558 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Peel N F, Moore D J, Barrington N A, Bax D E, Eastell R. Risk of vertebral fracture and relationship to bone mineral density in steroid treated rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1995. 54801–806.806 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Sambrook P N. The skeleton in rheumatoid arthritis: common mechanisms for bone erosion and osteoporosis? J Rheumatol 2000. 272541–2542.2542 [PubMed]
10. Gravallese E M, Manning C, Tsay A, Naito A, Pan C, Amento E. et al Synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis is a source of osteoclast differentiation factor. Arthritis Rheum 2000. 43250–258.258 [PubMed]
11. Takayanagi H, Iizuka H, Juji T, Nakagawa T, Yamamoto A, Miyazaki T. et al Involvement of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand/osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis from synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000. 43259–269.269 [PubMed]
12. Hofbauer L C, Khosla S, Dunstan C R, Lacey D L, Boyle W J, Riggs B L. The roles of osteoprotegerin and osteoprotegerin ligand in the paracrine regulation of bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res 2000. 152–12.12 [PubMed]
13. Geusens P P, LAndewe R BM, Garnero P, Chen D, Dunstan C R, Lems W F, Stinissen P, van der Heijde D MFM, van der Linden S, Boers M. The ratio of circulating osteoprotegerin to RANKL in early rheumatoid arthritis predicts later joint destruction. Arthritis Rheum 2006. 541772–1777.1777 [PubMed]
14. Sinigaglia L, Nervetti A, Mela Q, Bianchi G, Del Puente A, Di Munno O. et al A multicenter cross sectional study on bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis. Italian Study Group on Bone Mass in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 2000. 272582–2589.2589 [PubMed]
15. Tengstrand B, Hafstrom I. Bone mineral density in men with rheumatoid arthritis is associated with erosive disease and sulfasalazine treatment but not with sex hormones. J Rheumatol 2002. 292299–2305.2305 [PubMed]
16. Lodder M C, Haugeberg G, Lems W F, Uhlig T, Orstavik R E, Kostense P J. et al Radiographic damage associated with low bone mineral density and vertebral deformities in rheumatoid arthritis: the Oslo‐Truro‐Amsterdam (OSTRA) collaborative study. Arthritis Rheum 2003. 49209–215.215 [PubMed]
17. Forsblad D H, Larsen A, Waltbrand E, Kvist G, Mellstrom D, Saxne T. et al Radiographic joint destruction in postmenopausal rheumatoid arthritis is strongly associated with generalised osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003. 62617–623.623 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Lodder M C, de Jong Z, Kostense P J, Molenaar E T, Staal K, Voskuyl A E. et al Bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: relation between disease severity and low bone mineral density. Ann Rheum Dis 2004. 631576–1580.1580 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch J A, Halse J I, Kvien T K. Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 394 patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum 2000. 43522–530.530 [PubMed]
20. Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch J A, Halse J I, Kvien T K. Reduced bone mineral density in male rheumatoid arthritis patients: frequencies and associations with demographic and disease variables in ninety‐four patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis Register. Arthritis Rheum 2000. 432776–2784.2784 [PubMed]
21. Kroot E J, Nieuwenhuizen M G, Waal Malefijt M C, van Riel P L, Pasker‐de Jong P C, Laan R F. Change in bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the first decade of the disease. Arthritis Rheum 2001. 441254–1260.1260 [PubMed]
22. Haugeberg G, Orstavik R E, Uhlig T, Falch J A, Halse J I, Kvien T K. Bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a population‐based cohort of 366 patients followed up for two years. Arthritis Rheum 2002. 461720–1728.1728 [PubMed]
23. Lems W F, Dijkmans B A C. Should we look for osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 1998. 57325–327.327 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Laan R F, Buijs W C, Verbeek A L, Draad M P, Corstens F H, van de Putte L B. et al Bone mineral density in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: influence of disease activity and functional capacity. Ann Rheum Dis 1993. 5221–26.26 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Shenstone B D, Mahmoud A, Woodward R, Elvins D, Palmer R, Ring F. et al Bone mineral density in nonsteroid treated early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1994. 53681–684.684 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Gough A K, Lilley J, Eyre S, Holder R L, Emery P. Generalised bone loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 1994. 34423–27.27 [PubMed]
27. Keller C, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. Bone mineral density in women and men with early rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2001. 30213–220.220 [PubMed]
28. Forslind K, Keller C, Svensson B, Hafstrom I. Reduced bone mineral density in early rheumatoid arthritis is associated with radiological joint damage at baseline and after 2 years in women. J Rheumatol 2003. 302590–2596.2596 [PubMed]
29. Goekoop‐Ruiterman Y P, Vries‐Bouwstra J K, Allaart C F, van Zeben D, Kerstens P J, Hazes J M. et al Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005. 523381–3390.3390 [PubMed]
30. Kolta S, Ravaud P, Fechtenbaum M, Dougados M, Roux C. Accuracy and Precision of 62 densitometerd using a European Spine Phantom. Osteoporos Int 1999. 1014–19.19 [PubMed]
31. Tothill P, Hannan W J, Wilkinson S. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X‐ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. British Journal of Radiology 2001. 74166–176.176 [PubMed]
32. Jun Zhang M B, Kai F Yu. What's the Relative Risk? JAMA 1998. 2801690–1691.1691 [PubMed]
33. Versluis R G J A. Petri H, van de Ven CM, Scholtes ABJ, Papapoulos SE, Springer MP. Prevalentie van osteoporose bij postmenopauzale vrouwen in een huisartspraktijk. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999. 14320–24.24 [PubMed]
34. Smeets‐Goevaers C G, Lesusink G L, Papapoulos S E, Maartens L W, Keyzer J J, Weerdenburg J P, Beijers L M, Zwinderman A H, Knottnerus J A, Pols H A, Pop V J. The prevalence of low bone mineral density in Dutch perimenopausal women: the Eindhoven Perimenopausal Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 1998. 8404–409.409 [PubMed]
35. Als O S, Gotfredsen A, Riis B J, Christiansen C. Are disease duration and degree of functional impairment determinants of bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 1985. 44406–411.411 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Egeland T, Munthe E. The role of the laboratory in rheumatology. Rheumatoid factors. Clin Rheum Dis 1983. 9135–160.160 [PubMed]
37. Jacoby R K, Jayson M I, Cosh J A. Onset, early stages, and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical study of 100 patients with 11‐year follow‐up. Br Med J 1973. 296–100.100 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Westedt M L, Herbrink P, Molenaar J L, de Vries E, Verlaan P, Stijnen T. et al Rheumatoid factors in rheumatoid arthritis and vasculitis. Rheumatol Int 1985. 5209–214.214 [PubMed]
39. Vittecoq O, Pouplin S, Krzanowska K, Jouen‐Beades F, Menard J F, Gayet A, Daragon A, Tron F, Le Loet X. Rheumatoid factor is the strongest predictor of radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis in a three‐year prospective study in community‐recruited patients. Rheumatology 2003. 8939–946.946 [PubMed]
40. Van Zeben D, Hazes J M, Zwinderman A H, Cats A, van der Voort E A, Breedveld F C. Clinical significance of rheumatoid factors in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of a follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis 1992. 91029–1035.1035 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Henderson L B, Adams J S, Goldstein D R, Braunstein G D, Rotter J I, Scheuner M T. A familial risk profile for osteoporosis. Genet Med 2000. 2222–225.225 [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...