![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Holte et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Direct visualization of a significant stenosis of the right coronary artery by transthoracic echocardiography. A case report 1Department of Internal Medicine, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway 2Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway 3Department of Cardiology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author.Espen Holte: es-holte/at/online.no; Johnny Vegsundvåg: johnnyvegsundvag/at/adsl.no; Rune Wiseth: rune.wiseth/at/ntnu.no Received July 26, 2007; Accepted October 1, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Non-invasive imaging of coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography is an emerging diagnostic tool to study the left main (LM), left descending artery (LAD), circumflex (Cx) and right coronary artery (RCA). Impaired coronary circulation can be assessed by measuring coronary velocity flow reserve (CVFR) by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Coronary artery stenoses can be identified as localized colour aliasing and accelerated flow velocities. We report a case with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of a 46-year-old man. With non-invasive imaging of coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), we identified a segment of the mid right coronary artery (RCA) suggestive of stenosis with localized colour aliasing and accelerated flow velocity. We found a high ratio between the stenotic peak velocity and the prestenotic peak velocity, and a pathologic coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) distal to the stenosis in the posterior interventricular descending branch (RDP). Subsequent coronary angiography demonstrated one vessel disease with a stenosis in segment 3 of RCA, which was successfully treated with percutaneos coronary intervention PCI. Two weeks following the PCI procedure he was readmitted to hospital with chest pain. A subacute stent thrombosis was questioned, and repeated echocardiography was preformed. The mid portion of RCA showed normal and laminar flow. The CVFR of RCA measured in the RDP showed normal vasodilatory response, confirming an open RCA without any flow limitation. A repeated coronary angiogram demonstrated only a mild in stent intimal hyperplasia. This case illustrates the value of transthoracic echocardiography as a tool both in the diagnosis and the follow-up of chest pain disorders and coronary flow problems. Transthoracic echocardiography allows both direct visualization of the various coronary segments and assessment of the CVFR. Background Non-invasive imaging of coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography is an emerging diagnostic tool to study the left main (LM), left descending artery (LAD), circumflex (Cx) and right coronary artery (RCA) [1]. Impaired coronary circulation can be assessed by measuring coronary velocity flow reserve (CVFR) by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography [2-4]. Coronary artery stenoses can be identified as localized colour aliasing and accelerated flow velocities [5,6]. We report a case with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), where transthoracic echocardiography showed a significant stenosis of the middle part of the RCA, confirmed by pathologic CVFR measured in the posterior interventricular descending branch (RDP) and by coronary angiography. The stenosis was successfully treated by percutaneos coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stent. The patient was readmitted to hospital 2 weeks later after a new episode of chest pain. Transthoracic echocardiography did not indicate stent related flow reduction with normal CVFR of the RDP. Coronary angiography performed 3 months later demonstrated minor in stent intimal hyperplasia with no significant stenosis. Case presentation A 46-year-old man presented with typical retrosternal chest pain compatible with ACS. ECG was normal while cardiac troponin I was slightly elevated at 0.06 μcg/L(≤ 0.04 μcg/L as normal reference). He was treated with acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, atorvastatin, carvedilol, and subcutaneous enoxaparin. There were no episodes of recurrent chest pain. The patient was admitted to our hospital during a pilot phase of a study comparing transthoracic coronary flow measurements by ultrasound with results obtained at coronary angiography. Accordingly, the patient was examined with an Acuson Sequoia c 512 (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc) ultrasound system connected to a standard 3.5 MHz transthoracic transducer. Left ventricular contractility was normal. With the use of all standard and modified apical, parasternal and subcostal views [5], we identified by colour flow Doppler the LM, the proximal, mid and distal segment of the LAD, the proximal and mid segment of the Cx, the proximal, mid and distal segments of the RCA, and the RDP. The velocity scale was set to 0.24 m/s, but was actively changed. Angle correction was used. Contrast agent was not used. The LM, LAD, proximal and mid segments of the Cx, RDP and proximal segment of RCA showed laminar flow and normal flow velocities, without any signs of colour-aliasing suggestive of stenosis. In the subcostal 4-chamber view we identified a segment of the mid RCA with colour-aliasing (Figure (Figure1),1
From a modified apical 2-chamber view the CVFR was measured both in the RDP and the distal segment of LAD, and hyperaemic flow was obtained by venous infusion of adenosine (140 μcg/kg/min). The CVFR of the LAD was normal (Table 1), indicating that the LAD was open with good microvascular function and without any significant stenosis. The CVFR value of 1.17 measured in the RDP was clearly pathologic (Table 1, Figure Figure2),2
Subsequent coronary angiography demonstrated one vessel disease with a stenosis in segment 3 of the right coronary artery (Figure (Figure3).3
Two weeks following the PCI procedure the patient was readmitted to hospital with chest pain. ECG and level of cardiac troponin I was normal. A subacute stent thrombosis was questioned, and a repeated echocardiography was performed. The mid portion of the RCA was thoroughly scanned, with findings of normal and laminar flow without any colour flow aliasing, suggestive of no flow impairment at the stented segment. Repeated CVFR of the RDP showed a normal vasodilatory response (Table 1, Figure Figure5),5
Discussion Several recent reports have documented the feasibility of visualizing most segments of the main coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography [1,5]. By this technique, coronary stenoses typically show local flow acceleration and turbulence expressed as colour aliasing by colour flow Doppler and accelerated flow velocities across the stenosis [5,6]. To assess the severity of the stenoses, flow acceleration can be quantified by comparing flow velocities at the site of aliasing with nearest upstream non-accelerated prestenotic flow velocities [5,7]. A maximal-to-prestenotic peak diastolic flow velocity ratio greater than 2.0 predicts significant stenosis with high sensitivity and specificity [5]. Our patient demonstrated in the mid RCA a significantly accelerated flow velocity of 1.39 m/s (Figure (Figure1)1 In normal coronary arteries without an epicardial flow-limiting stenosis, CVFR is controlled by the microcirculatory resistances, and coronary hyperemia can be induced by vasodilatory drugs and physiologic stimuli decreasing the resistances of microcirculation. Hemodynamic significant epicardial coronary stenoses create strong proximal resistances that are higher than that opposed from the microcirculation, and reduce the CVFR [8]. Several recent reports have documented the feasibitity of transthoracic echocardiography (with the pulsed Doppler sample volume placed distally to the flow-limiting stenosis) of estimating the CVFR [2-4,8]. A CFVR value of less than 2 has been widely adopted to indicate one or more hemodynamic significant stenoses located more proximally in the coronary artery [8], documented for the LAD [4] and RDP [3]. Our patient showed pathologic CVFR of the RDP (Table 1, Figure Figure2)2 With the use of transthoracic echocardiography, both direct visualization of formerly angioplasty-treated segments [9] and CVFR measurements [10] have been reported as suitable methods of follow-up of treated stenoses. After a successful PCI treatment of the stenosis in the mid RCA, our patient presented with chest pain suggestive of possible restenosis. However, both direct visualization of this segment and CVFR measurement of the RDP (Table 1, Figure Figure5)5 Conclusion This case illustrates the value of transthoracic echocardiography as a tool both in the diagnosis and the follow-up of chest pain disorders and coronary flow problems. Transthoracic echocardiography allows both direct visualization of the various coronary segments and assessment of the CVFR of the LAD and RCA. With the use of these techniques, we were able to correctly identify a hemodynamic significant stenosis of the mid RCA. When the patient was readmitted with chest pain we could exclude flow limitation in the stented segment by transthoracic ultrasound examination of the RCA. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2003 Nov 17; 1():16.
[Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2003]J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov; 32(5):1251-9.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998]Am J Cardiol. 2003 Dec 15; 92(12):1389-93.
[Am J Cardiol. 2003]J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Jun; 18(6):679-85.
[J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005]J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Dec; 13(12):1091-9.
[J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000]J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Jun; 18(6):679-85.
[J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005]Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2003 Nov 17; 1():16.
[Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2003]J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Jun; 18(6):679-85.
[J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005]J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Dec; 13(12):1091-9.
[J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jan; 35(1):164-8.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000]Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005 Mar 25; 3():8.
[Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005]J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov; 32(5):1251-9.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998]Am J Cardiol. 2003 Dec 15; 92(12):1389-93.
[Am J Cardiol. 2003]J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Dec; 16(12):1252-7.
[J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003]Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004 Jan; 5(1):51-64.
[Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004]Am J Cardiol. 2003 Feb 15; 91(4):412-7.
[Am J Cardiol. 2003]