![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Candelario-Jalil et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Resveratrol potently reduces prostaglandin E2 production and free radical formation in lipopolysaccharide-activated primary rat microglia 1Neurochemistry Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg Medical School, Hauptstrasse 5, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany 2Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA 3Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Freiburg Medical School, Lehenerstrasse 88, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany 4Departamento de Biología Celular, Fisiología e Inmunología. Universidad de Córdoba, Avda Menéndez Pidal s/n. 14004, Córdoba, Spain 5VivaCell Biotechnology GmbH, Ferdinand-Porsche-Str. 5, D-79211 Denzlingen, Germany Corresponding author.Eduardo Candelario-Jalil: ecandelario-jalil/at/salud.unm.edu; Antonio C Pinheiro de Oliveira: antoniocpo/at/yahoo.com.br; Sybille Gräf: sybille.graef/at/mars.uni-freiburg.de; Harsharan S Bhatia: harsharan.bhatia/at/uniklinik-freiburg.de; Michael Hüll: michael.huell/at/uniklinik-freiburg.de; Eduardo Muñoz: fi1muble/at/uco.es; Bernd L Fiebich: bernd.fiebich/at/klinikum.uni-freiburg.de Received April 16, 2007; Accepted October 10, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Neuroinflammatory responses are triggered by diverse ethiologies and can provide either beneficial or harmful results. Microglial cells are the major cell type involved in neuroinflammation, releasing several mediators, which contribute to the neuronal demise in several diseases including cerebral ischemia and neurodegenerative disorders. Attenuation of microglial activation has been shown to confer protection against different types of brain injury. Recent evidence suggests that resveratrol has anti-inflammatory and potent antioxidant properties. It has been also shown that resveratrol is a potent inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 activity. Previous findings have demonstrated that this compound is able to reduce neuronal injury in different models, both in vitro and in vivo. The aim of this study was to examine whether resveratrol is able to reduce prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) production by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated primary rat microglia. Methods Primary microglial cell cultures were prepared from cerebral cortices of neonatal rats. Microglial cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml of LPS in the presence or absence of different concentrations of resveratrol (1–50 μM). After 24 h incubation, culture media were collected to measure the production of PGE2 and 8-iso-PGF2α using enzyme immunoassays. Protein levels of COX-1, COX-2 and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) were studied by Western blotting after 24 h of incubation with LPS. Expression of mPGES-1 at the mRNA level was investigated using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Results Our results indicate that resveratrol potently reduced LPS-induced PGE2 synthesis and the formation of 8-iso-PGF2α, a measure of free radical production. Interestingly, resveratrol dose-dependently reduced the expression (mRNA and protein) of mPGES-1, which is a key enzyme responsible for the synthesis of PGE2 by activated microglia, whereas resveratrol did not affect the expression of COX-2. Resveratrol is therefore the first known inhibitor which specifically prevents mPGES-1 expression without affecting COX-2 levels. Another important observation of the present study is that other COX-1 selective inhibitors (SC-560 and Valeroyl Salicylate) potently reduced PGE2 and 8-iso-PGF2α production by LPS-activated microglia. Conclusion These findings suggest that the naturally occurring polyphenol resveratrol is able to reduce microglial activation, an effect that might help to explain its neuroprotective effects in several in vivo models of brain injury. Background Resveratrol (trans-3,5,4'-trihydroxystilbene) is a polyphenolic compound present in relatively large amounts in grapes and red wine. In smaller quantities, resveratrol is also present in almost 70 plant species, where it has been found to act as an anti-fungicide and confer disease resistance in the plant kingdom [1]. Recently, this natural compound has received a great deal of attention due to its ability to serve as a potent antioxidant [2]. In addition, resveratrol has been proven to possess anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, chemopreventive, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective properties [3-10]. One of the most interesting properties of resveratrol is its ability to confer potent neuroprotection in several models of brain injury, both in vitro [10-12] and in vivo [7,8,13,14]. Resveratrol readily crosses the intact blood-brain barrier as demonstrated in previous studies [7,15]. There is much evidence from recent studies, which indicate that ischemic brain injury is potently reduced in resveratrol-treated animals. The first report suggesting that cerebral infarction is significantly diminished by systemic administration of resveratrol comes from Huang et al. [13], using an in vivo model of focal cerebral ischemia in rats. In another study, resveratrol increased the number of CA1 hippocampal neurons surviving a global cerebral ischemic insult [7]. Resveratrol not only reduced neuronal death but also reduced the number of reactive astrocytes and activated microglial cells [7]. The free radical scavenging ability seems to underlie the efficacy of resveratrol against neuronal demise in cerebral ischemia, as suggested in a recent study [16]. In order to explain at the molecular level the mechanisms responsible for resveratrol neuroprotection under ischemic conditions, in vitro models involving neuronal cultures as well as hippocampal slices subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation have been employed. Nitric oxide-related toxicity to cultured hippocampal neurons was dramatically inhibited by resveratrol through a mechanism that seems to be at least partially related to its antioxidant effect [11]. Similarly, resveratrol attenuated cell death in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation through activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3-K)/Akt pathway [17]. The neuroprotective effect of resveratrol is not only restricted to cerebral ischemia. This natural compound also reduced oxidative stress and lesion volume in a model of traumatic brain injury [18] and spinal cord injury [19,20] in rats. Furthermore, resveratrol protected against excitotoxicity induced by kainic acid [8], and oxidative stress and behavioral changes in a rat model of Huntington's disease [21]. In addition, it has been recently demonstrated that resveratrol promotes intracellular degradation of amyloid β peptide via a mechanism that involves the proteasome [22]. Although mounting evidence convincingly demonstrates the potential of resveratrol to provide significant protection against different types of brain injury, the exact molecular mechanisms responsible for these beneficial effects are not fully elucidated. Its antioxidant ability alone can not give an explanation to the wide array of pharmacological properties of this compound. Microglial cells are important protagonists in the cascade of events leading to tissue injury following neurodegeneration and other types of cerebral damage [23-28]. Very few studies have investigated the effects of resveratrol on microglial activation during neuroinflammation. In an earlier study, resveratrol was found to produce a potent suppressive effect on tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and nitric oxide production induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the mouse microglial cell line N9 [29]. These effects are mediated through inhibition of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation and p38 MAPK phosphorylation [29]. Based on these previous reports, the present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of resveratrol on neuroinflammatory events associated to the production of prostaglandin E2 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in activated primary microglial cells. Our findings indicate for the first time that resveratrol is a potent inhibitor of PGE2 production in microglia through a mechanism that involves reduction in the expression of the key enzyme involved in PGE2 formation, namely, microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1). Direct inhibitory effects of resveratrol on cyclooxygenase activity as well as reduction in 8-isoprostane formation are other beneficial effects that contribute to the potent attenuation of microglial activation, and possibly to the neuroprotective efficacy of this natural compound in different models of brain injury. Methods Reagents and Antibodies Trans-resveratrol, Trolox C, α-tocopherol, and LPS (from Salmonella typhimurium) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). LPS was resuspended in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Cell Concepts, Umkirch, Germany) as 5 mg/ml stock, and was used at a final concentration of 10 ng/ml in the culture. The COX-1 inhibitors SC-560 and Valeroyl salicylate (VAS) were obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, USA). Resveratrol, Trolox C, and α-tocopherol were dissolved in absolute ethanol. SC-560 and VAS were dissolved in DMSO and water, respectively. Solvent concentration in the culture media was maintained at less than 0.1%. All agents, used at the given concentrations, do not affect the viability of the cells as observed through a luminescent kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), which measures metabolic ATP levels (data not shown). Antibodies against COX-1 (M-20) and COX-2 (M-19) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Rabbit polyclonal antibody against mPGES-1 was obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA), while the antibody against actin was from Sigma (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Primary rat microglial cell culture Primary mixed glial cell cultures were established from cerebral cortices of one-day neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats as described in details in our previous reports [30-34]. Briefly, forebrains were minced and gently dissociated by repeated pipetting in PBS and filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer (Falcon). Cells were collected by centrifugation (1000 rpm, 10 min), resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum (Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany) and antibiotics (40 U/ml penicillin and 40 μg/ml streptomycin, both from PAA Laboratories, Linz, Austria), and cultured on 10-cm cell culture dishes (5 × 105 cells/plate, Falcon) in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Medium was prepared taking extreme care to avoid LPS contamination [35]. Floating microglia were harvested every week (between 2–7 week) and re-seeded into 75 cm2 culture flask (for RNA extraction and Western blots) or 24-well plates (for 8-isoprostane and PGE2 estimation) to give pure microglial cultures. The following day, cultures were washed to remove non-adherent cells, and fresh medium was added. The purity of the microglial culture was >98% as previously determined by immunofluorescence and cytochemical analysis [35]. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Enzyme Immunoassay Supernatants were harvested, centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min and levels of PGE2 in the media were measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Assay Designs Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA; distributed by Biotrend, Cologne, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Standards from 39 to 2500 pg/ml were used. The sensitivity of this assay is 36.2 pg/ml. Cyclooxygenase Activity Assay To determine any direct inhibitory effect of resveratrol on COX-1 and COX-2 enzymatic activity, an arachidonic acid assay was performed as described [36,37]. Briefly, primary rat microglial cells were plated in 24-well cell culture plates, and pre-incubated with LPS (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. Medium was then removed, and cells washed in serum-free medium. Resveratrol (5–50 μM) was added, and after 15 min pre-stimulation, 15 μM arachidonic acid was supplemented for another 15 min. Supernatants were then used for determination of PGE2 [36]. We also investigated the effects of resveratrol on microglial COX-1 enzymatic activity. Under unstimulated conditions, primary microglial cells only express the COX-1 isoform [34]. Thus, the COX-1 activity assay was conducted exactly as mentioned before without pre-incubation with LPS. RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Total RNA was extracted using the guanidine isothiocyanate method according to Chomczynski and Sacchi [38]. For RT-PCR, 2 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Mannheim, Germany), RNase Inhibitor rRNasin® (Promega), dNTP master mix (Invitek, Berlin, Germany) and random hexamer primers (Promega). PCR was carried out using Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), dNTP master mix (Invitek, Berlin, Germany) and the following primers: rat microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1, mPGES-1 (forward: 5'-ATG ACT TCC CTG GGT TTG GTG ATG GAG -3', reverse: 5'- ACA GAT GGT GGG CCA CTT CCC AGA -3', annealing temperature 65°C, 35 cycles, amplicon size: 459 bp). Primers for rat COX-2 were as follows: forward, 5'-TGC GAT GCT CTT CCG AGC TGT GCT-3' and reverse, 5'- TCA GGA AGT TCC TTA TTT CCT TTC-3', annealing temperature 55°C, 35 cycles, amplicon size: 479 bp). Primers used for amplifying a fragment of 426 bp from rat COX-1 mRNA were: forward, 5'-CGG CCT CGA CCA CTA CCA ATG -3' and reverse, 5'- TGC GGG GCG GGA ATG AAC T-3', annealing temperature 60°C, 30 cycles. Equal equilibration was determined using rat β-actin primers (forward: 5'- ATG GAT GAC GAT ATC GCT -3', reverse: 5'- ATG AGG TAG TCT GTC AGG T -3', 48°C, 30 cycles, product length: 569 bp) or primers for S12 from rat (forward: 5'- ACG TCA ACA CTG CTC TAC A -3', reverse: 5'- CTT TGC CAT AGT CCT TAA C -3', 56°C, 30 cycles, product length: 312 bp). PCR products were separated electrophoretically on a 2% agarose gel. Potential contamination by genomic DNA was controlled by omitting reverse transcriptase and using primers for the housekeeping genes (β-actin or S12) in the subsequent PCR amplification. Only RNA samples showing no bands after this procedure were used for further investigation. Primers were designed using the Primer3 software developed by the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research [39], and synthesized through an in-house facility (Dr. Gabor Igloi, Institute for Biology III, Freiburg, Germany). PCR analysis was performed after 4 h of stimulation with LPS. Western blot analysis For COX-1, COX-2 and mPGES-1 immunoblotting, microglial cells were left untreated or treated with LPS (10 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of resveratrol (1–50 μM) for 24 h. Cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in 1.3x SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)-containing sample buffer without DTT or bromophenol blue containing 100 μM orthovanadate [40]. Lysates were homogenized by repeated passage through a 26-gauge needle. Protein contents were measured using the bicinchoninic acid method (BCA protein determination kit from Pierce, distributed by KFC Chemikalien, Munich, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) was used as a standard. Before electrophoresis, bromophenol blue and DTT (final concentration, 10 mM) were added to the samples. For Western blotting, 60 μg of total protein from each sample were subjected to SDS-PAGE (polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) under reducing conditions. Proteins were then transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) by semi-dry blotting. The membrane was blocked overnight at 4°C using Rotiblock (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and for another hour at room temperature before incubation with the primary antibody. Primary antibodies were goat anti-COX-2, goat anti-COX-1 and rabbit anti-mPGES-1. Primary antibodies were diluted 1:500 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) and 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma). Membranes were incubated with the corresponding primary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. After extensive washing (three times for 15 min each in TBST), proteins were detected with horseradish peroxidase-coupled rabbit anti-goat IgG (Santa Cruz, 1:100,000 dilution) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham, 1:25,000 dilution) using chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). Quantification of the Western blots was performed using ScanPack 3.0 software (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). Equal protein loading and transfer were assessed by subjection of each sample to a Western blot for actin (rabbit anti-actin IgG, diluted 1:5000). All western blot experiments were carried out at least three times. Determination of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) 8-isoprostanes are formed in response to free radical attack on arachidonic acid on membrane phospholipids and are considered as a reliable and highly sensitive measure of free radical formation [41]. Microglial cells were pre-treated for 30 min with different concentrations of resveratrol, Trolox C, α-tocopherol, SC-560, or VAS (see Results and Figures). After 30 min pre-stimulation, cells were added 10 ng/ml LPS for 24 h. Control experiments consisted of cells treated only with the solvent of each compound without LPS. Supernatants were harvested and the levels of 8-iso-PGF2α (IUPAC nomenclature: 15-F2t-IsoP) were measured by an enzyme immunoassay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The standards were used in the range of 3.9 to 500 pg/ml (detection limit of 5 pg/ml). Data analysis Data from at least 3 experiments were used for data analysis. Original data were converted into %-values of LPS control and mean ± S.E.M. were calculated. Values were compared using t-test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test (multiple comparisons). Results In our initial experiments, we investigated the effects of resveratrol on LPS-induced PGE2 production in microglia. As shown in Fig. Fig.1A,1A
These findings prompted us to investigate the ability of resveratrol to reduce COX enzymatic activity in activated microglia. Results from this experiment are shown in Fig. Fig.2.2
Since there are significant changes in gene expression in LPS-activated microglia, including a dramatic upregulation of the PGE2 synthesizing enzymes COX-2 and mPGES-1 [31,34,42], we decided to investigate the effects of resveratrol on the expression of these key enzymes responsible for PGE2 production in LPS-stimulated microglia, at both the mRNA and protein levels. RT-PCR analysis showed that control microglial cells do not express COX-2 or mPGES-1 mRNA under control conditions, but the expression of these enzymes is dramatically induced by addition of LPS to the cultures (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
Since resveratrol has been proven to have potent antioxidant properties, we aimed to determine the efficacy of this compound in reducing free radical production by activated microglia. LPS produced a very significant increase in the formation of 8-iso-PGF2α, a very sensitive marker of cellular free radical generation, as assessed by enzyme immunoassay (Fig. (Fig.5).5
The ability of resveratrol to inhibit the peroxidase activity of COX-1 is a well-known pharmacological effect of this compound [43,44]. It was then very important to investigate the ability of other COX-1 inhibitors to reduce PGE2 and 8-iso-PGF2α production in microglia activated with LPS. Interestingly, two structurally different highly selective COX-1 inhibitors (SC-560 and VAS) potently reduced PGE2 production (Fig. (Fig.6A6A
Next, we examined the potential effects of SC-560 and VAS on LPS-mediated mPGES-1 expression, which could help to explain if the effects of resveratrol on the reduction in mPGES-1 were mediated by a COX-1 mechanism. RT-PCR analysis reveals that COX-1 inhibition by SC-560 or VAS failed to reduce mPGES-1 expression in LPS-activated primary microglia (Fig. (Fig.7A7A
Since previous studies have shown the ability of antioxidants to modify gene expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in activated microglia [31,45], we studied the effects of Trolox C on LPS-induced COX-2 and mPGES-1 expression. Trolox C slightly reduced mPGES-1 expression, although this effect did not reach statistical significance, as found in the densitometric analysis of three independent experiments (Fig. (Fig.7B).7B Discussion Scientific literature on natural compounds has been recently accumulating an enormous amount of reports describing the neuroprotective ability of natural polyphenolic substances in different models of brain injury both in vitro and in vivo. Resveratrol is one of the most promising compounds, considering recent evidence indicating its potent ability to reduce cerebral damage after ischemia/hypoxia [7,13,17], trauma [18], excitotoxicity [8], and other conditions leading to neuronal demise [19,21]. It is widely accepted that neuroinflammation is a key player in various pathological events associated with brain injury. More specifically, microglial activation and the subsequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, ROS, and prostaglandins play a role of paramount importance in cerebral damage. Inhibition of COX-2 induction and/or activity has been proven to reduce brain injury after ischemia [46-50], excitotoxicity [47,51], and MPTP-induced neurodegeneration [52-54]. The most important mechanisms associated with the toxic effects of enhanced COX activity during neuroinflammation include production of PGE2 [55-59] and formation of free radicals leading to oxidative stress [34,37,60,61]. In the present study, we have found that resveratrol is a potent inhibitor of PGE2 and free radical formation by activated microglial cells. These findings add significant information on the molecular mechanisms involved in the neuroprotective effect of this compound. The ability of resveratrol to reduce PGE2 production comes from the modulation of multiple events in the COX/PGE2 pathway: 1) resveratrol is a potent inactivator of the peroxidase reaction of COX-1 [43], and thus is considered a relatively selective inhibitor of this isozyme; 2) resveratrol significantly diminished LPS-induced expression of mPGES-1 (Figs. (Figs.33 The relative contribution of each of these mechanisms to the overall reduction in PGE2 by resveratrol is difficult to address based on present data. However, some issues deserve further discussion. The ability of resveratrol to inhibit the peroxidase activity of COX-1 is a well-known pharmacological effect of this compound [43,44]. COX-1 is constitutively expressed in microglia under resting conditions, and its expression is not induced by LPS as shown in Figs. Figs.3A3A It has been previously shown that increased COX activity is associated with oxidative damage following different types of brain injury, including excitotoxicity [61,63,64], ischemia [60,65,66], and traumatic brain injury [67]. Furthermore, treatment with COX inhibitors has been proven to significantly reduce IL-1β- and LPS-induced oxidative damage in neuronal and microglial cells, respectively [34,37]. The interesting pharmacological properties of resveratrol in terms of inhibition of COX-1 and direct antioxidant ability, may underlie the dramatic attenuation of PGE2 and free radical production by LPS-activated microglia. It has long been known that free radicals directly increase COX activity and conversely antioxidants reduce COX catalytic activity [68-70]. Based on these reports, one may speculate that maintenance of microglial redox status by resveratrol contributes to the reduction in COX activity and PGE2 production in these cells. This is further supported by our finding that other antioxidants (Trolox C and α-tocopherol) are also able to reduce PGE2 formation (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B An important new observation of the present study is the dramatic reduction in LPS-mediated expression of mPGES-1 in cells treated with resveratrol (Figs. (Figs.33 To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to document the ability of resveratrol to reduce mPGES-1 expression, as shown here in activated microglia. It is of great relevance that resveratrol reduced mPGES-1, but not COX-2 expression (Fig. (Fig.4).4 It has been recently reported that resveratrol reduces COX-2 expression in mouse BV-2 microglial cells through a mechanism that possibly involves inhibition of NF-κB activation [77]. Our present findings are not in line with these previous observations. The reasons for these discrepancies are not known, but might be related to different cell types and species (mouse BV-2 versus primary rat microglia). At this point we have not yet identified the exact signal transduction pathway involved in resveratrol's effects on mPGES-1 expression. However, present findings will inspire new investigations in order to elucidate the differential signal transduction pathways responsible for the expression of mPGES-1 and COX-2 in microglia. This is of importance since this could lead to the discovery of new targets for attenuating microglial activation and PGE2 synthesis. Because of the downstream position of mPGES-1 in the PGE2-synthesizing cascade, selective pharmacological blockade of its expression, as shown here for resveratrol, would affect only the pro-inflammatory PGE2, and would not decrease the production of other physiologically important prostanoids. Although COX-2 inhibitors have been highly marketed in the last five years including clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease, there are also important side effects associated with this new group of drugs [78,79]. Thus, it is of paramount importance our finding that resveratrol specifically reduced mPGES-1 without affecting COX-2 levels. Recent evidence indicates that enhanced expression and activity of mPGES-1 is a critical pathological event during inflammation, both in the CNS and in the periphery. Mice lacking the mPGES-1 gene are protected against stroke-induced injury [80] and display reduced pain hypersensitivity and inflammation [81,82]. Conclusion In summary, we are proposing here that significant attenuation of PGE2 and free radical production by activated microglia might contribute to the neuroprotective effects of resveratrol. This study gives further support to the potential use of resveratrol as a therapeutic agent to reduce microglial activation following different types of brain injury. Abbreviations LPS (lipopolysaccharide); ROS (reactive oxygen species); PGE2 (prostaglandin E2); COX (cyclooxygenase); mPGES-1 (microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1); EIA (enzyme immunoassay); DTT (1,4-Dithio-DL-threitol); BSA (bovine serum albumin); ANOVA (analysis of variance); 8-iso-PGF2α (8-iso-prostaglandin F2α); VAS (Valeroyl Salicylate). Competing interests The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions ECJ designed the study, performed 8-iso-PGF2α assay, Western blot and RT-PCR analysis, partly directed the work, reviewed the data, and wrote the manuscript. ACPO, SG and HSB performed Western blot and RT-PCR analysis. MH and EM provided consultation and reviewed the data. BLF directed the work, contributed to the design of the study, reviewed the data and helped to write the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements The skillful technical assistance of Ulrike Götzinger-Berger and Brigitte Günter is greatly acknowledged. Eduardo Candelario-Jalil was supported by a research fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Bonn, Germany). Antonio Carlos Pinheiro de Oliveira was supported by the CAPES Foundation. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Clin Biochem. 1997 Mar; 30(2):91-113.
[Clin Biochem. 1997]Life Sci. 2000 Jan 14; 66(8):663-73.
[Life Sci. 2000]Carcinogenesis. 2001 Aug; 22(8):1111-7.
[Carcinogenesis. 2001]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May; 993():276-86; discussion 287-8.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May; 993():276-86; discussion 287-8.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003]Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Mar; 141(6):997-1005.
[Br J Pharmacol. 2004]Brain Res. 2002 Dec 27; 958(2):439-47.
[Brain Res. 2002]Neurochem Res. 2004 Nov; 29(11):2105-12.
[Neurochem Res. 2004]Life Sci. 2001 Jul 20; 69(9):1057-65.
[Life Sci. 2001]Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Oct; 131(4):711-20.
[Br J Pharmacol. 2000]Neurobiol Dis. 2006 Oct; 24(1):170-82.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2006]Mol Cell Biochem. 2007 Jan; 294(1-2):137-44.
[Mol Cell Biochem. 2007]J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jul; 40(1):138-45.
[J Vasc Surg. 2004]Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2006 Oct; 27(10):1317-25.
[Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2006]Neurochem Res. 2004 Nov; 29(11):2105-12.
[Neurochem Res. 2004]Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Sep; 17(5-6):485-92.
[Behav Pharmacol. 2006]J Neuroinflammation. 2004 Jul 30; 1(1):14.
[J Neuroinflammation. 2004]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jan; 8(1):57-69.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007]Int Immunopharmacol. 2005 Jan; 5(1):185-93.
[Int Immunopharmacol. 2005]Glia. 1996 Oct; 18(2):152-60.
[Glia. 1996]Glia. 2005 Aug 15; 51(3):199-208.
[Glia. 2005]J Neurosci. 1989 Jan; 9(1):183-94.
[J Neurosci. 1989]J Neurochem. 2003 Jul; 86(1):173-8.
[J Neurochem. 2003]J Neuroimmunol. 2006 May; 174(1-2):39-51.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2006]Glia. 2005 Aug 15; 51(3):199-208.
[Glia. 2005]Anal Biochem. 1987 Apr; 162(1):156-9.
[Anal Biochem. 1987]Nature. 1970 Aug 15; 227(5259):680-5.
[Nature. 1970]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31; 95(7):3449-54.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Eur J Biochem. 1997 Feb 1; 243(3):726-31.
[Eur J Biochem. 1997]Glia. 2005 Aug 15; 51(3):199-208.
[Glia. 2005]J Neurochem. 2005 Sep; 94(6):1546-58.
[J Neurochem. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 21; 279(21):22727-37.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Bioorg Med Chem. 2005 Nov 1; 13(21):5981-5.
[Bioorg Med Chem. 2005]Eur J Biochem. 1997 Feb 1; 243(3):726-31.
[Eur J Biochem. 1997]Biochem J. 2003 Mar 1; 370(Pt 2):459-67.
[Biochem J. 2003]Brain Res. 2002 Dec 27; 958(2):439-47.
[Brain Res. 2002]Life Sci. 2001 Jul 20; 69(9):1057-65.
[Life Sci. 2001]Neurobiol Dis. 2006 Oct; 24(1):170-82.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2006]Mol Cell Biochem. 2007 Jan; 294(1-2):137-44.
[Mol Cell Biochem. 2007]Neurochem Res. 2004 Nov; 29(11):2105-12.
[Neurochem Res. 2004]J Neurosci. 1997 Apr 15; 17(8):2746-55.
[J Neurosci. 1997]Ann Neurol. 2003 Aug; 54(2):155-62.
[Ann Neurol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30; 98(3):1294-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Am J Pathol. 1999 Sep; 155(3):995-1004.
[Am J Pathol. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29; 100(9):5473-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 21; 279(21):22727-37.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Neurochem. 2005 Sep; 94(6):1546-58.
[J Neurochem. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 21; 279(21):22727-37.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Bioorg Med Chem. 2005 Nov 1; 13(21):5981-5.
[Bioorg Med Chem. 2005]Glia. 2005 Aug 15; 51(3):199-208.
[Glia. 2005]Brain Res. 2002 Oct 4; 951(2):218-26.
[Brain Res. 2002]J Neurochem. 2005 Jun; 93(6):1561-7.
[J Neurochem. 2005]Eur J Pharmacol. 2000 Mar 3; 390(3):295-8.
[Eur J Pharmacol. 2000]J Neurochem. 2002 Jun; 81(5):1028-34.
[J Neurochem. 2002]J Neurochem. 2003 Aug; 86(3):545-55.
[J Neurochem. 2003]Neurosci Res. 2003 Oct; 47(2):245-53.
[Neurosci Res. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Feb 14; 296(2):382-5.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973]Free Radic Biol Med. 2002 Mar 15; 32(6):503-11.
[Free Radic Biol Med. 2002]J Neurosci Res. 2001 Oct 15; 66(2):163-70.
[J Neurosci Res. 2001]In Vivo. 2004 May-Jun; 18(3):351-6.
[In Vivo. 2004]J Neurochem. 2004 Feb; 88(4):939-47.
[J Neurochem. 2004]J Neurochem. 2005 Sep; 94(6):1546-58.
[J Neurochem. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 20; 275(42):32783-92.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Nov 30; 38(6):633-8.
[J Biochem Mol Biol. 2005]J Med Chem. 2006 Nov 30; 49(24):7182-9.
[J Med Chem. 2006]Curr Pharm Des. 2000 Nov; 6(17):1725-36.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2000]J Rheumatol. 2006 Jul; 33(7):1403-8.
[J Rheumatol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 1; 103(31):11790-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 6; 279(32):33684-95.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22; 100(15):9044-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]