![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Clinical Investigation IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling and the inflammasome are essential in pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice 1Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Embryology, University of Orleans and CNRS, Orleans, France. 2INSERM U620, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France. 3Key-Obs SA, Orleans, France. 4Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan. Address correspondence to: Isabelle Couillin, Molecular Immunology and Embryology, CNRS UMR6218, Transgenose Institute, CNRS, 3B rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orleans, France. Phone: 33-238-25-54-39; Fax: 33-238-25-79-79; E-mail: couillin/at/cnrs-orleans.fr. Received April 2, 2007; Accepted September 12, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The molecular mechanisms of acute lung injury resulting in inflammation and fibrosis are not well established. Here we investigate the roles of the IL-1 receptor 1 (IL-1R1) and the common adaptor for Toll/IL-1R signal transduction, MyD88, in this process using a murine model of acute pulmonary injury. Bleomycin insult results in expression of neutrophil and lymphocyte chemotactic factors, chronic inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis. We demonstrate that these end points were attenuated in the lungs of IL-1R1– and MyD88-deficient mice. Further, in bone marrow chimera experiments, bleomycin-induced inflammation required primarily MyD88 signaling from radioresistant resident cells. Exogenous rIL-1β recapitulated a high degree of bleomycin-induced lung pathology, and specific blockade of IL-1R1 by IL-1 receptor antagonist dramatically reduced bleomycin-induced inflammation. Finally, we found that lung IL-1β production and inflammation in response to bleomycin required ASC, an inflammasome adaptor molecule. In conclusion, bleomycin-induced lung pathology required the inflammasome and IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling, and IL-1 represented a critical effector of pathology and therapeutic target of chronic lung inflammation and fibrosis. Introduction Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal interstitial pneumonitis of unknown cause characterized by sequential episodes of acute lung injury with subsequent scarring, leading ultimately to respiratory failure, and no effective therapy is available (1). IPF is characterized by alveolar epithelial injury and hyperplasia, inflammatory cell accumulation, fibroblast proliferation, and deposition of extracellular matrix with fibrotic lesions. Bleomycin-induced (BLM-induced) inflammation and fibrosis represent an experimental model for IPF. BLM induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis of alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells, leading to chemokine and proinflammatory cytokine secretion, inflammatory cell recruitment, remodeling, and lung fibrosis (2, 3). Tissue injury and acute inflammatory responses lead in human and mouse models to an abnormal repair process with dysregulation of the balance between MMPs and their inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), resulting in degradation of extracellular matrix components and accumulation of collagen with progression to pulmonary fibrosis (4–6). Chronic inflammation and/or the profibrotic cytokine network activate proliferation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, producing MMPs and TIMPs and resulting in disruption of alveolar structure and loss of lung function (7). Circulating fibrocytes derived from bone marrow progenitor cells also contribute to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis (8, 9).
The molecular mechanisms leading to lung injury and inflammation are largely unknown. The degradation of the extracellular matrix components, such as hyaluronan, collagens may be involved in triggering of the inflammatory response as endogenous danger signals. Hyaluronan activates macrophages, dendritic and endothelial cells mediated through TLR4 (10–12) and TLR2 engagement (13). In vivo, hyaluronan was proposed to regulate injury and repair upon BLM administration, through TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 signaling (14). Other hypotheses for the inflammatory response upon lung injury include the formation of elastin degradation products with chemotactic function (15, 16) or the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α or IL-1 (2).
Apoptosis is a crucial step in induction of inflammation and fibrosis, which is mediated by Fas-FasL signaling (17), activating caspase-1 and -3 and leading to production of cytokine and chemokines (18). Activation of inflammatory caspases in the inflammasome complex is an essential step for the processing and maturation of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-18, and IL-33 in response to microbial, stress, or danger signals (19). Upon activation, the inflammasome is formed by a member of the NALP protein family, such as NALP1, NALP2, or NALP3, and the adaptor protein ASC that connects the NALP with caspase-1 (20). Signals and mechanisms leading to inflammasome activation are still poorly understood. The inflammasome is fundamental for microbial detection (19). However, recent findings have demonstrated that the inflammasome is proficient in sensing stress or endogenous danger signals such as extracellular ATP, hypotonic stress, or toxins associated with cell injury (21, 22). IL-1β is a proinflammatory cytokine produced by activated macrophages and epithelial cells, inducing the production of chemokines, TNF-α, IL-6, or MMPs with neutrophil recruitment and fibroblast proliferation (23–25), features that are closely associated with chronic inflammation and structural changes observed in the lungs of patients with chronic fibrotic lung disease (24). IL-1 family members alter the host response to an inflammatory, infectious, or immunological challenge (26, 27). The best known members of this family are IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), and IL-18. IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-18 are highly inflammatory cytokines, and dysregulation of their expression can lead to severe pathological effects. IL-1β is produced as an inactive cytoplasmic precursor (pro-IL-1β, p35) that must be cleaved to generate the mature active form (p17). The IL-1β–converting enzyme, better known as caspase-1, is required for this cleavage (28). IL-1 ligands typically bind to a cellular receptor complex consisting of IL-1 receptor 1 (IL-1R1) and IL-1 receptor accessory protein, with IL-1Ra acting as a natural antagonist of IL-1α/β by trapping IL-1R1 molecules (26).
To further investigate the potential involvement of the innate immune recognition by the TIR family (29, 30) in response to BLM injury and development of chronic inflammation and fibrosis, we studied the role of the MyD88 adaptor protein, the common adaptor of IL-1R1, IL-18R, and most TLR signaling pathways, in a series of relevant gene-deficient mice. We report here that BLM-induced acute lung inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis depended on IL-1R1 and MyD88 signaling, whereas TLR2, TLR4, and IL-18R were dispensable. Further, neutralization of IL-1β by antibody or specific blockage of IL-1R1 antagonist reduced BLM-induced pathology, suggesting a critical role of IL-1 and underlining the potential for such therapies to be effective in pulmonary interstitial diseases. Finally, acute cellular inflammation and IL-1β production in response to BLM are dependent upon the adaptor protein ASC, which is essential for the inflammasome function. These findings provide insights into the molecular processes underlying the inflammatory conditions of BLM-induced lung fibrosis and further support a pivotal role of the inflammasome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung injury diseases.
Results Neutrophil and lymphocyte recruitment in the bronchoalveolar space are MyD88 and IL-1R1 dependent. MyD88, a critical adaptor molecule for most members of the TLR/IL-1R family, has been reported to be involved in TLR-mediated acute lung inflammation (14, 31). To further analyze the implications of the different MyD88-dependent pathways in acute lung injury, we evaluated the airway inflammatory cell response by enumerating the cells recruited in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) after i.n. BLM administration. Total cell counts were increased at days 1, 7, and 11 upon BLM administration in C57BL/6 mice but were lower in MyD88–/– and IL-1R1–/– mice (Figure (Figure1A).1
BLM-induced neutrophil recruitment in the lung is TLR2, -3, -4, and -9 independent. Since neutrophil recruitment was abrogated in the absence of MyD88, the common adaptor of TLRs, we investigated the role of individual TLRs in BLM-induced acute lung inflammation. Mice deficient for TLR2, TLR4, TLR9, as well as TLR3, the only MyD88-independent TLR, showed abundant neutrophil recruitment 24 hours after BLM administration, with no significant difference in comparison with WT mice (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI32285DS1). These data demonstrate that the TLRs tested are dispensable for MyD88-mediated acute neutrophil influx into bronchoalveolar space. To exclude a potential compensation of TLR2 and TLR4, we tested double TLR2/4-deficient mice and found no significant difference from C57BL/6 mice (Supplemental Figure 1B). Identical results were obtained in the absence of the common adaptor protein for TLR2 and -4, TIRAP, using TIRAP-deficient mice (data not shown). We further examined myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity (Supplemental Figure 1C), expression of neutrophil chemotactic factor keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) and IL-6 (Supplemental Figure 1, D and E), and expression of thymus activation–regulated chemokine (TARC), a lymphocyte chemotactic factor (Supplemental Figure 1F), in the lung after BLM-induced lung injury. No significant difference in lung MPO, KC, IL-6, or TARC responses between TLR2/4-deficient and C57BL/6 mice was found. Similar data were obtained for KC, IL-6, and TARC levels in BALF (data not shown). These data demonstrate that TLR-deficient mice, and in particular double TLR2/4-deficient mice, are not protected from BLM-induced lung inflammation, in contrast to MyD88-deficient mice. Therefore, the resistance of MyD88-deficient mice to BLM-induced lung injury appears to be TLR independent, leaving IL-1R–related signaling as a potential pathogenic pathway. Reduced acute inflammation induced by BLM in IL-1R1– but not in IL-18R–deficient mice. Acute stress and injury may activate the inflammasome promoting the processing and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-18 (32, 33), and IL-1 is increased upon BLM injury (34). Since resistance of MyD88-deficient mice to BLM-induced lung injury was TLR independent, we studied further the implication of the IL-1R family in BLM-induced acute lung injury. In fact, IL-1R1–deficient mice display a dramatic reduction of neutrophil recruitment into the bronchoalveolar space at day 1 after BLM administration (Figure (Figure2A).2
Since IL-1 and TNF-α share proinflammatory properties, we investigated the participation of TNF-α, a cytokine that does not use the MyD88 adaptor protein for signaling, using TNF-α–deficient mice (35). The inflammatory response of TNF-α–deficient mice to BLM was not significantly different from that of C57BL/6 mice in terms of increased total cell influx into BALF, induced neutrophil influx into BALF and lung, or KC- and IL-6–enhanced production in lung, suggesting that TNF-α is dispensable for the inflammatory response to BLM (Supplemental Figure 2, A–E).
Further, IL-1β is produced in the lung upon BLM administration (Figure (Figure2D),2 The induction of cytokines and chemokines involved in neutrophil recruitment was evaluated in BALF and lung homogenates of C57BL/6 WT and MyD88- and IL-1R1–deficient mice. IL-1β was augmented in the lung at 24 hours after BLM administration (Figure (Figure2D)2 The production of the neutrophil chemotactic factor KC (Figure (Figure2E)2 Resident cells mediate BLM-induced acute neutrophil recruitment as well as IL-1, IL-6, and KC production into the lung. Since IL-1R1/MyD88 is expressed on a broad range of cells, we next addressed the respective role of bone marrow–derived cells and lung resident cells in the BLM response using mixed bone marrow chimeric mice (31). C57BL/6 WT bone marrow reconstitution of MyD88–/– mice (WT→KO) did not restore neutrophil recruitment to the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in response to BLM (Figure (Figure3A),3
We next determined the chemokine and cytokine production in lung homogenates from chimeric mice. WT bone marrow reconstitution of MyD88-deficient (WT→KO) mice after BLM administration did not restore IL-1β production in lung tissue (Figure (Figure3C),3 Remodeling process induced by BLM injury is IL-1R1 and MyD88 dependent. We extended our analysis of BLM-induced injury and fibrosis by evaluating remodeling factors during the repair process. The gelatinase activities were assessed by the measurement of MMP-9 (gelatinase A) and MMP-2 (gelatinase B) by zymography. MMP-9 (99 kDa) is largely produced by neutrophils, and its activity is associated with neutrophil recruitment (40). MMP-9 activity was significantly upregulated in BALF at day 1 in C57BL/6 mice but not in MyD88–/– mice, and only partially in IL-1R1–/– mice (Figure (Figure4A).4
Attenuation of BLM-induced lung fibrosis in IL-1R1– and MyD88-deficient mice. The net result of BLM-induced tissue injury is chronic inflammation and progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Microscopic investigations at 7 days after BLM administration showed acute inflammatory reactions in the lungs and signs of fibrosis in C57BL/6 mice. The hallmarks of the pathology are severe alveolitis with abundant neutrophils in the alveoli, recruitment of mononuclear cells, and destruction and repair with thickening of the alveolar septae. On day 11, the lung sections also showed extensive fibrotic areas with abundant collagen production (Figure (Figure5B),5
Exogenous IL-1β causes acute and late lung inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis. In order to confirm that IL-1β is central in BLM-induced acute inflammatory response, we first analyzed the effects of exogenous recombinant murine IL-1β (rmIL-1β). Mice treated with rmIL-1β presented a very transient and modest body weight loss in comparison with BLM-treated mice. A single i.n. rmIL-1β administration resulted in acute neutrophil recruitment into BALF at 24 hours in WT mice (Figure (Figure6A),6
To further assess the role of IL-1β in the development of lung fibrosis, we analyzed the effect of exogenous rmIL-1β on the remodeling process. Indeed, 24 hours after IL-1β instillation, MMP-9 activity was upregulated in the BALF of C57BL/6, TLR2/4–/–, and TNF-α–/– mice but not MyD88–/– or IL-1R1–/– mice (Figure (Figure6F).6
Neutralization of IL-1 reduces acute lung inflammation and remodeling induced by BLM. To confirm that IL-1β is a critical mediator of BLM-induced lung pathology, IL-1β neutralizing antibodies and IL-1Ra were given i.p. at the time of BLM administration. The IL-1β neutralizing antibodies reduced neutrophil recruitment in the BALF as well as KC and IL-6 production in the lung at day 1 (data not shown). IL-1Ra dramatically reduced neutrophil influx into BALF at day 1 (Figure (Figure8A).8
BLM-induced acute inflammation is attenuated in ASC-deficient mice. Acute stress and injury induced by BLM may activate the inflammasome promoting the processing and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β. We showed that IL-1β is increased and essential in BLM-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis. Therefore, we hypothesized that the inflammasome may be critical in BLM-induced acute lung injury. In fact, mice deficient for the adaptor molecule ASC, shared by NALP1–3, display an important reduction of total cell influx (Figure (Figure9A)9
Discussion We show here that the acute lung injury induced by BLM administration led to the production of IL-1β, inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis and was dependent upon IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling. Indeed, lung pathology was significantly reduced in IL-1R1– and MyD88-deficient mice, pointing to the essential role of endogenous IL-1 in pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in response to BLM. Confirming that IL-1 acts as a critical mediator, we show that exogenous rmIL-1β recapitulates acute inflammation with alveolar tissue destruction and remodeling, resulting in progressive interstitial fibrosis. The data suggest that BLM-mediated lung injury, inflammation, and fibrosis depend upon IL-1R1 and MyD88 signaling. Importantly, IL-1R1 blockade by the IL-1Ra anakinra attenuates the inflammatory pathology. Finally, both lung IL-1β production and acute inflammation upon BLM administration are dependent on the presence of the ASC adaptor molecule, supporting a critical role of the inflammasome in BLM-induced lung injury. BLM causes lung tissue cell stress and damage, which may lead to the degradation of the extracellular matrix glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan, elastin, collagens, and other matrix components, inducing inflammation. Degradation of extracellular matrix upon tissue injury recently attracted substantial interest for the molecular mechanisms of inflammation (41). Hyaluronan produced upon BLM injury induces inflammation that is perpetuated in the absence of the hyaluronan scavenger receptor CD44 (42). High- and low-molecular fragments seem to have different biological effects (41). Since both TLR2 and TLR4 are activated by hyaluronan in vitro (10–13, 43), hyaluronan-dependent TLR activation may play a role in in vivo inflammation and repair. Here we examine the requirement of individual TLRs for lung inflammation and repair upon BLM exposure. Our data using TLR-deficient mice show that TLR2, -3, -4, and -9 and notably, combined TLR2/4 signaling, are dispensable for BLM lung injury. Therefore, we confirm that neutrophil recruitment in the airways is dependent upon MyD88 signaling but are not able to demonstrate the TLR2/4 dependence reported previously in response to BLM (14). Indeed, Jiang et al. (14) showed a decrease in cellular inflammation in the bronchoalveolar space but an enhanced lung injury with increased cell accumulation within the interstitium in MyD88- and TLR2/4-deficient mice in comparison with WT mice. Our different results could be explained by differences in the dose and the type of BLM used or differences in the genetic background of the genetically modified mouse strains used. A similar discussion on the relative role of TLR2 and TLR4 versus IL-1R1 in MyD88-dependent monosodium urate crystal–induced inflammation is reported in models of gout arthritis (44–46). Therefore the induction of inflammation in response to BLM in mice is TLR2 and TLR4 independent, but this does not exclude a role for TLRs in hyaluronan-mediated regulation of inflammation and fibrosis.
An alternative hypothesis to explain inflammation upon tissue injury is the induction of protease activation, leading to a multitude of peptides including elastin-derived peptides, which have chemoattractive activity, and antibody neutralization of elastin fragments has been shown to prevent inflammation (15). Further, a tripeptide derived from extracellular matrix degradation has been reported to induce CXCR2-dependent lung inflammation (16). In addition, CXCR3 signaling appears to be nonredundant in BLM-induced inflammation and fibrosis (47). Indeed, we show that BLM induced the CXC chemokine KC, confirming that lung injury release of chemoattractive mediators may enhance inflammation.
Here we demonstrate TLR2- and TLR4-independent, MyD88-dependent signaling in BLM-induced lung injury, and we investigate the role of IL-1 and IL-18, both important proinflammatory cytokines, using the MyD88 adaptor for their receptor signaling. In fact, we identify IL-1R1 signaling as pivotal for BLM-induced injury, inflammation, and fibrosis, as IL-1R1–deficient mice but not IL-18R–deficient mice were protected. TGF-β1, a critical mediator of remodeling and fibrotic responses in the lung, was induced in BALF after BLM administration in WT mice but was undetectable in MyD88- or IL-1R1–deficient mice. We demonstrate that IL-1β is produced upon BLM as reported for injured and apoptotic lung epithelial cells (34). As IL-1β production is decreased in MyD88-deficient mice upon BLM administration, the data suggest MyD88-dependent signaling for IL-1β production. The IL-1 receptor family, in particular ST2, the IL-33 receptor, and IL-1Rrp2, also signal through MyD88 and could play a role in BLM-induced IL-1β production and inflammation (37, 48). Moreover, MyD88 was also recently implicated in IFN-γ receptor–induced inflammation by stabilizing IFN-γ receptor–induced cytokine and chemokine mRNA (39). Alternatively, the IL-1R1/MyD88 pathway might be required for optimal IL-1β production via autocrine or paracrine mechanisms that amplify the response.
Reciprocal MyD88-C57BL/6 bone marrow–chimeric mice suggest that MyD88 signaling in radioresistant resident (probably epithelial) cells, rather than in hemopoietic cells, is essential to initiate the inflammatory response in terms of neutrophil recruitment, IL-1β, IL-6, and KC production. Nevertheless, hemopoietic cells seem to contribute to optimal neutrophil inflammation, and this could be related to the production of other neutrophil attractants such as eotaxin an MCP-1, which have been implicated in BLM-induced fibrotic changes and could be produced by hemopoietic cells in an IL-1R1/MyD88–dependent manner (49, 50). IL-1β induced by BLM in epithelial cells triggers a cascade of biochemical events, resulting in the production of several mediators and chemokines including KC and IL-6, inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis.
To confirm that IL-1 represents a key mediator of the lung pathology observed, we administered locally to naive mice either IL-1β alone or IL-1β–neutralizing antibodies together with BLM. A single i.n. dose of rmIL-1β recapitulated most of the lung injury, inflammation, and repair parameters seen after BLM treatment, suggesting that IL-1β is indeed a key pathogenic factor. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental model demonstrating directly that a single IL-1β administration induces lung inflammation and remodeling, progressing to fibrosis. Nevertheless, IL-1β induces less inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis than BLM. This may be due to the lower cytotoxicity of IL-1β in comparison to BLM and to the regulation of IL-1β effects, in particular via TNF-α and via TLR2 and TLR4. IL-1 is a critical inflammatory cytokine and may indeed be responsible for lung pathologies (26). Adenoviral gene transfer of human IL-1β (AdIL-1β) initiated neutrophil inflammation and fibrosis (51). Further, IL-1β is expressed in chronically inflamed and fibrotic tissues (26, 34, 52–54). IL-1Ra was reported to prevent or revert pulmonary fibrosis but to have no effect on acute and chronic inflammation elicited in mice by silica or BLM (55). Finally, AdIL-1β together with TNF-α induces TGF-β and Smad3, which are critical in fibrogenesis. In fact, absence of Smad3 abrogates fibrosis induced by AdIL-1β (56).
In the BLM model, overt inflammation with tissue damage precedes the repair process, leading to fibrosis, and the pathological process is under the control of several factors. TNF-α and IL-18 were reported to play a role in BLM lung inflammation and fibrosis (57–60), which we could not confirm using TNF-α– and IL-18R–deficient mice. In particular, TNF-α was believed to be the essential inflammatory cytokine in pulmonary fibrosis and anti–TNF-α, but not anti–IL-1, neutralizing therapies were used in clinical trials in the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nevertheless, TNF-α seems particularly important in resolving the experimental BLM-mediated inflammation and fibrosis (61). The present results demonstrate that endogenous IL-1 is crucial and nonredundant in BLM induced pathology, rather than TNF-α as proposed before (57, 58, 62). In fact, exogenous IL-1β recapitulates acute inflammation and remodeling induced by BLM with alveolar tissue destruction, resulting in progressive interstitial fibrosis. Furthermore, several recent reports suggest that phenotypes associated with MyD88 deficiency are not necessarily due to defective TLR signaling but rather to IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling (46, 63–65).
Finally, IL-1R1 blockade with IL-1Ra (anakinra) dramatically attenuated lung inflammation induced by BLM. Previous studies using IL-1Ra treatment in mice reported either an inhibitory effect of IL-1Ra on fibrosis but not on acute or chronic inflammation induced by BLM (55) or no effect of IL-1Ra on BLM-induced fibrosis (66). To our knowledge, no further studies have attempted to resolve this conflict. Nevertheless, there is still no available treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, from which patients die 3 or 4 years after the onset of the fibrotic phase. We and others showed that IL-1β is not only a proinflammatory cytokine but is also profibrotic (25, 51). IL-1β is associated with autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases in humans and plays a central role during the tissue destructive phase of these diseases. Moreover, IL-1 neutralization is very efficient in treating several destructive diseases such as systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, hereditary periodic fever syndromes, and gout arthritis (67–74). This illustrates the pleiotropic role of IL-1β and the potential of IL-1 neutralization in the resolution of severe diseases. Our results documenting the prominent role of IL-1 in BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis in an experimental murine model representing several aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are in support of reconsidering IL-1 neutralization in treatment of severe human lung fibrosis.
A crucial part of the innate immune response is the assembly of the inflammasome, a cytosolic complex of proteins that activates caspase-1 to process the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. The adaptor protein ASC is essential for inflammasome function, binding directly to caspase-1 (75, 76). The inflammasome may be involved as a crucial innate sensor of danger signals generated by lung injury, and the new family of pathogen-recognition receptors, the NACHT-LRRs, including NALPs, may have a complementary role to that of TLRs (19). We show here that IL-1β production and lung inflammation in response to BLM are dependent upon the adaptor protein ASC, demonstrating for what we believe to be the first time a pivotal role of the inflammasome in BLM-induced lung injury. Therefore, our data suggest that activation of the inflammasome rather than TLRs is critical to produce mature IL-1β in response to danger signals induced by acute lung injury. We demonstrate that IL-1β maturation by the inflammasome and IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling are crucial steps of innate immune and pathologic responses in lung injury. The endogenous danger signals leading to inflammasome activation upon BLM are not known. Our findings open important fields and questions upon the nature of receptors involved in sensing endogenous dangers signals and in assembly of the inflammasome upon lung injury.
In an attempt to summarize our data, we propose the model presented in Figure Figure10.10
In conclusion, we implicate the inflammasome rather than TLRs in the sensing of the danger/stress signal, leading to the production of IL-1β, and demonstrate that IL-1 is a critical inflammatory mediator of acute inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis upon BLM lung injury. Therefore, the data point to a pivotal role of IL-1 in the innate immune response and underline the importance of IL-1 and IL-1R signaling as potential therapeutic targets in inflammatory and fibrotic lung disease. These findings provide insight into the molecular processes underlying the inflammatory conditions of BLM-induced lung fibrosis and further support a pivotal role of the inflammasome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary chronic diseases. Methods Mice. MyD88–/– (77), IL-1R1–/– (78), IL-18R–/– (79), TLR4–/– (80), TLR2–/– (81), TLR2–/–TLR4–/–, TLR3–/– (82), TLR9–/– (83), TRIF–/– (84), TNF-α–/– (35), or ASC–/– (75) mice were used. MyD88–/–, TNF-α–/–, TLR2–/–, TLR4–/–, and double-deficient TLR2–/–TLR4–/– mice were backcrossed 10 times on the WT C57BL/6 genetic background and 7 times for IL-1R1–/– and TLR3–/– mice. Littermate controls were used for ASC–/– backcrossed only 3 times on the WT C57BL/6 genetic background. All mice, including control C57BL/6 (MyD88+/+), were bred in our animal facility at the Transgenose Institute (CNRS, Orleans, France). For experiments, adult (6–10 weeks old) animals were kept in sterile, isolated ventilated cages. All animal experiments complied with the French Government’s ethical and animal experiment regulations and were approved by the Comité Régional d’Ethique pour l’Expérimentation Animale (Tours, France). All animals had access to water and food ad libitum before and after exposure.
Administration of BLM, IL-1β, IL-1 neutralizing antibody, or IL-1Ra. BLM sulfate (300 μg or 15 mg/kg) from Bellon Laboratories in saline, mr IL-1β (0.25 μg or 1 μg) from R&D Systems in saline, or saline alone were given through the airways by nasal instillation in a volume of 40 μl under light ketamine-xylasine anesthesia. The IL-1β neutralizing antibody (provided by H. Gram Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) and the IL-1Ra (Amgen) were injected at 100 μg i.p. at the time of BLM administration. BALF. After incision of the trachea, a plastic cannula was inserted and airspaces were washed using 0.3 ml of PBS solution heated to 37°C. The rib cage was then gently massaged to enable maximum cell collection. The fluid was collected by careful aspiration. This procedure was performed 10 times, and the recovery of the total lavage exceeded 95%. The samples collected were dispatched in 2 fractions: the first (1 ml corresponding to the 2 first lavages) was used for mediator measurement, and the second for the cell determination (4 ml). The first fraction was centrifuged (600 g for 10 minutes), and supernatant was fractionated and kept at –80°C until mediator determination. The cell pellet was then resuspended in 0.4 ml PBS, pooled with the second fraction, and maintained at 4°C until cell determination.
Lung homogenization. After BAL was performed, the whole lung was removed and placed inside a microtube (Lysing matrix D; Q Bio Gene) with 1 ml PBS, total lung tissue extract was prepared using a Fastprep system (FP120, Q Bio Gene), the extract was then centrifuged and the supernatant stored at –80°C before mediator measurement, MPO, or collagen assay with Sircol Collagen Assay (France Biochem Division). MPO activity in lung. Lung tissue MPO activity was evaluated as described (85). In brief, the right heart ventricle was perfused with saline to flush the vascular content, and lungs were frozen at –20°C until use. Lung was homogenized by polytron and centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellets were resuspended in 1 ml PBS containing 0.5% hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (HTAB) and 5 mM EDTA. Following centrifugation, 50 μl of supernatants were placed in test tubes with 200 μl PBS-HTAB-EDTA, 2 ml Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS), 100 μl o-dianisidine dihydrochloride (1.25 mg/ml), and 100 μl H2O2 0.05%. After 15 minutes of incubation at 37°C in an agitator, the reaction was stopped with 100 μl NaN3 1%. The MPO activity was determined as absorbance at 460 nm against medium.
Cell count and determination. Total cell count was determined in BALF using a particle counter (Z2 Coulter; Beckman Coulter). Differential cell counts were performed on cytospin preparations (Cytospin 3; Thermo Shandon) after staining for 4 minutes in May-Grünwald stain (MG-1L; Sigma-Aldrich) and 8 minutes in 95% Giemsa stain (GS-500; Sigma-Aldrich). Differential cell counts were made on 100 cells using standard morphological criteria. Mediator measurements. IL-1β, KC, IL-6, TARC, and TIMP-1 levels in BALF or lung homogenate were determined using ELISA assay kits (Mouse DuoSet for IL-1β, KC, IL-6, TARC, and TIMP-1; R&D Systems), except for the experiments described in Figures Figures22 Bone marrow transplantation to obtain mixed chimera. Recipient mice underwent a lethal total-body irradiation as reported before (86, 87). Fresh, unseparated bone marrow cells (2 × 106 per mouse) were injected into the lateral tail vein of the irradiated recipient mice 24 hours after lethal irradiation. Blood was collected in EDTA-containing tubes at regular intervals, and the hematological parameters were determined with a Technikon H1E analyzer. The reconstituted mice were used 3 months after bone marrow transplantation. Further, in some experiments we used GFP-expressing donor cells (88), in order to control the extent of reconstitution, as previously described (31). The current protocol yielded more than 95% of blood circulating leukocytes of donor origin as assessed by green fluorescence of the peripheral blood using flow cytometry.
Zymographic analysis of MMPs. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were determined by gelatin zymography. Briefly, nonreduced supernatant samples of BALF (15 μl) and standards (161-0305; Bio-Rad) were loaded onto 7% polyacrylamide gels (wt/vol) incorporating 0.1% (wt/vol) gelatin substrate. Proteins were subjected to electrophoresis at 20–30 mA for 3 hours. The gel was then washed twice in 2.5% Triton (vol/vol), rinsed 3 times quickly with distilled water, and placed in distilled water 3 times for 20 minutes. Each wash was performed using gentle stirring. Gels were incubated overnight at 37°C in 50 mM Tris buffer (containing 5 mM CaCl2 and 2 μM ZnCl2). Finally, gels were stained in Coomassie Blue and then destained progressively until bands of lysis (enzyme activity) in the gels appeared as regions of negative staining. The areas of lysis were analyzed using a densitometric analyzer (Bio-profil; Vilbert Lourmat), images were taken, and band densities were measured.
Lung collagen measurements. Aliquots of lung homogenate (50 μl) were then assayed for lung collagen levels and compared with a standard curve prepared from bovine skin using the Sircol collagen dye binding assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biocolor Ltd.). Histology. After BAL and lung perfusion, the large lobe was fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for standard microscopic analysis. Sections (3 μm) were stained with H&E or Chromotrope Aniline Blue as described previously (89). The severity of the morphological changes (infiltration by neutrophils and mononuclear cells and destruction and thickening of the alveolar septae and fibrosis) were assessed semiquantitatively using a score of 0–5 by 2 independent observers.
Statistics. Statistical evaluation of differences between the experimental groups was determined by Mann-Whitney U test using Prism software. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Supplemental data Click here to view.(154K, pdf) Acknowledgments We acknowledge the skilled technical assistance of Marielle Maret and Virginie Vasseur. We thank Virginie Pétrilli and Jürk Tschopp for the gift of the ASC-deficient mice strain. The authors are grateful to François Erard for scientific discussion. Grant support was received from the French Ministère de l’Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie, the Fondation de la Recherche, and CNRS. The work was also supported by grants from Le Studium and Fondation de la Recherche Médicale.
Footnotes Nonstandard abbreviations used: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BALF, BAL fluid; BLM, bleomycin; IL-1R1, IL-1 receptor 1; IL-1Ra, IL-1 receptor antagonist; KC, keratinocyte-derived chemokine; MPO, myeloperoxidase; rm, recombinant murine; TARC, thymus activation–regulated chemokine; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Citation for this article: J. Clin. Invest. 117:3786–3799 (2007). doi:10.1172/JCI32285
References 1. Gross T.J., Hunninghake G.W. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:517–525. [PubMed] 2. Piguet P.F. Cytokines involved in pulmonary fibrosis. Int. Rev. Exp. Pathol. 1993;34:173–181. [PubMed] 3. Keane M.P., Strieter R.M., Belperio J.A. Mechanisms and mediators of pulmonary fibrosis. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2005;25:429–463. [PubMed] 4. Beeh K.M., Beier J., Kornmann O., Buhl R. Sputum matrix metalloproteinase-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloprotinease-1, and their molar ratio in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and healthy subjects. Respir. Med. 2003;97:634–639. [PubMed] 5. Manoury B., et al. The absence of reactive oxygen species production protects mice against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Res. 2005;6:11. [PubMed] 6. Madtes D.K., Elston A.L., Kaback L.A., Clark J.G. Selective induction of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001;24:599–607. [PubMed] 7. Lagente V., et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in the development of airway inflammation and remodeling. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2005;38:1521–1530. [PubMed] 8. Hashimoto N., Jin H., Liu T., Chensue S.W., Phan S.H. Bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;113:243–252. doi: 10.1172/JCI200418847. [PubMed] 9. Phillips R.J., et al. Circulating fibrocytes traffic to the lungs in response to CXCL12 and mediate fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;114:438–446. doi: 10.1172/JCI200420997. [PubMed] 10. Termeer C., Sleeman J.P., Simon J.C. Hyaluronan — magic glue for the regulation of the immune response? Trends Immunol. 2003;24:112–114. [PubMed] 11. Jameson J.M., Cauvi G., Sharp L.L., Witherden D.A., Havran W.L. Gammadelta T cell-induced hyaluronan production by epithelial cells regulates inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:1269–1279. [PubMed] 12. Taylor K.R., et al. Hyaluronan fragments stimulate endothelial recognition of injury through TLR4. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:17079–17084. [PubMed] 13. Scheibner K.A., et al. Hyaluronan fragments act as an endogenous danger signal by engaging TLR2. J. Immunol. 2006;177:1272–1281. [PubMed] 14. Jiang D., et al. Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat. Med. 2005;11:1173–1179. [PubMed] 15. Houghton A.M., et al. Elastin fragments drive disease progression in a murine model of emphysema. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116:753–759. doi: 10.1172/JCI25617. [PubMed] 16. Weathington N.M., et al. A novel peptide CXCR ligand derived from extracellular matrix degradation during airway inflammation. Nat. Med. 2006;12:317–323. [PubMed] 17. Dosreis G.A., Borges V.M., Zin W.A. The central role of Fas-ligand cell signaling in inflammatory lung diseases. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2004;8:285–293. [PubMed] 18. Kuwano K., et al. Attenuation of bleomycin-induced pneumopathy in mice by a caspase inhibitor. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2001;280:L316–L325. [PubMed] 19. Martinon F., Tschopp J. NLRs join TLRs as innate sensors of pathogens. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:447–454. [PubMed] 20. Tschopp J., Martinon F., Burns K. NALPs: a novel protein family involved in inflammation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:95–104. [PubMed] 21. Mariathasan S., et al. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440:228–232. [PubMed] 22. Martinon F., Petrilli V., Mayor A., Tardivel A., Tschopp J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440:237–241. [PubMed] 23. Barnes P.J. Mediators of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 2004;56:515–548. [PubMed] 24. Sasaki M., et al. Differential regulation of metalloproteinase production, proliferation and chemotaxis of human lung fibroblasts by PDGF, interleukin-1beta and TNF-alpha. Mediators Inflamm. 2000;9:155–160. [PubMed] 25. Raines E.W., Dower S.K., Ross R. Interleukin-1 mitogenic activity for fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells is due to PDGF-AA. Science. 1989;243:393–396. [PubMed] 26. Dinarello C.A. Interleukin-1. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1997;8:253–265. [PubMed] 27. Dunne A., O’Neill L.A. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal transduction during inflammation and host defense. Sci. STKE. 2003;2003:re3. [PubMed] 28. Burns K., Martinon F., Tschopp J. New insights into the mechanism of IL-1beta maturation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003;15:26–30. [PubMed] 29. Akira S., Uematsu S., Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;124:783–801. [PubMed] 30. Beutler B., et al. Genetic analysis of host resistance: toll-like receptor signaling and immunity at large. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006;24:353–389. [PubMed] 31. Noulin N., et al. Both hemopoietic and resident cells are required for MyD88-dependent pulmonary inflammatory response to inhaled endotoxin. J. Immunol. 2005;175:6861–6869. [PubMed] 32. Ogura Y., Sutterwala F.S., Flavell R.A. The inflammasome: first line of the immune response to cell stress. Cell. 2006;126:659–662. [PubMed] 33. Martinon F., Glimcher L.H. Gout: new insights into an old disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116:2073–2075. doi: 10.1172/JCI29404. [PubMed] 34. Cavarra E., et al. Early response to bleomycin is characterized by different cytokine and cytokine receptor profiles in lungs. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2004;287:L1186–L1192. [PubMed] 35. Marino M.W., et al. Characterization of tumor necrosis factor-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997;94:8093–8098. [PubMed] 36. Martin M.U., Wesche H. Summary and comparison of the signaling mechanisms of the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1592:265–280. [PubMed] 37. Schmitz J., et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23:479–490. [PubMed] 38. Towne J.E., Garka K.E., Renshaw B.R., Virca G.D., Sims J.E. Interleukin (IL)-1F6, IL-1F8, and IL-1F9 signal through IL-1Rrp2 and IL-1RAcP to activate the pathway leading to NF-kappaB and MAPKs. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:13677–13688. [PubMed] 39. Sun D., Ding A. MyD88-mediated stabilization of interferon-gamma-induced cytokine and chemokine mRNA. Nat. Immunol. 2006;7:375–381. [PubMed] 40. Manoury B., et al. Macrophage metalloelastase (MMP-12) deficiency does not alter bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. J. Inflamm. (Lond.). 2006;3:2. [PubMed] 41. Noble P.W., Jiang D. Matrix regulation of lung injury, inflammation, and repair: the role of innate immunity. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2006;3:401–404. [PubMed] 42. Teder P., et al. Resolution of lung inflammation by CD44. Science. 2002;296:155–158. [PubMed] 43. Termeer C.C., et al. Oligosaccharides of hyaluronan are potent activators of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2000;165:1863–1870. [PubMed] 44. Liu-Bryan R., Liote F. Monosodium urate and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals, inflammation, and cellular signaling. Joint Bone Spine. 2005;72:295–302. [PubMed] 45. Scott P., Ma H., Viriyakosol S., Terkeltaub R., Liu-Bryan R. Engagement of CD14 mediates the inflammatory potential of monosodium urate crystals. J. Immunol. 2006;177:6370–6378. [PubMed] 46. Chen C.J., et al. MyD88-dependent IL-1 receptor signaling is essential for gouty inflammation stimulated by monosodium urate crystals. . J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116:2262–2271. doi: 10.1172/JCI28075. [PubMed] 47. Jiang D., et al. Regulation of pulmonary fibrosis by chemokine receptor CXCR3. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;114:291–299. doi: 10.1172/JCI200416861. [PubMed] 48. Togbe D., et al. TLR4 gene dosage contributes to endotoxin-induced acute respiratory inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006;80:451–457. [PubMed] 49. Huaux F., et al. Role of Eotaxin-1 (CCL11) and CC chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) in bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2005;167:1485–1496. [PubMed] 50. Yara S., et al. FTS reduces bleomycin-induced cytokine and chemokine production and inhibits pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2001;124:77–85. [PubMed] 51. Kolb M., Margetts P.J., Anthony D.C., Pitossi F., Gauldie J. Transient expression of IL-1beta induces acute lung injury and chronic repair leading to pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;107:1529–1536. [PubMed] 52. Pan L.H., Ohtani H., Yamauchi K., Nagura H. Co-expression of TNF alpha and IL-1 beta in human acute pulmonary fibrotic diseases: an immunohistochemical analysis. Pathol. Int. 1996;46:91–99. [PubMed] 53. Phan S.H., Kunkel S.L. Lung cytokine production in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Exp. Lung Res. 1992;18:29–43. [PubMed] 54. Johnston C.J., et al. Early and persistent alterations in the expression of interleukin-1 alpha, interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA levels in fibrosis-resistant and sensitive mice after thoracic irradiation. Radiat. Res. 1996;145:762–767. [PubMed] 55. Piguet P.F., Vesin C., Grau G.E., Thompson R.C. Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) prevents or cures pulmonary fibrosis elicited in mice by bleomycin or silica. Cytokine. 1993;5:57–61. [PubMed] 56. Bonniaud P., et al. TGF-beta and Smad3 signaling link inflammation to chronic fibrogenesis. J. Immunol. 2005;175:5390–5395. [PubMed] 57. Piguet P.F., et al. Resistance of TNF/LT alpha double deficient mice to bleomycin-induced fibrosis. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 1997;78:43–48. [PubMed] 58. Ortiz L.A., et al. Expression of TNF and the necessity of TNF receptors in bleomycin-induced lung injury in mice. Exp. Lung Res. 1998;24:721–743. [PubMed] 59. Okamoto M., et al. Interleukin 18 (IL-18) in synergy with IL-2 induces lethal lung injury in mice: a potential role for cytokines, chemokines, and natural killer cells in the pathogenesis of interstitial pneumonia. Blood. 2002;99:1289–1298. [PubMed] 60. Fujita M., et al. Overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha produces an increase in lung volumes and pulmonary hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2001;280:L39–L49. [PubMed] 61. Kuroki M., et al. Repression of bleomycin-induced pneumopathy by TNF. J. Immunol. 2003;170:567–574. [PubMed] 62. Miyazaki Y., et al. Expression of a tumor necrosis factor-alpha transgene in murine lung causes lymphocytic and fibrosing alveolitis. A mouse model of progressive pulmonary fibrosis. . J. Clin. Invest. 1995;96:250–259. [PubMed] 63. Miller L.S., et al. MyD88 mediates neutrophil recruitment initiated by IL-1R but not TLR2 activation in immunity against Staphylococcus aureus. Immunity. 2006;24:79–91. [PubMed] 64. Su S.B., et al. Essential role of the MyD88 pathway, but nonessential roles of TLRs 2, 4, and 9, in the adjuvant effect promoting Th1-mediated autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 2005;175:6303–6310. [PubMed] 65. Fremond C.M., et al. IL-1 receptor-mediated signal is an essential component of MyD88-dependent innate response to mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J. Immunol. 2007;179:1178–1189. [PubMed] 66. He B., Zhao G.R., Liu X.M. The effect of IL-1 receptor antagonist on bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis [In Chinese]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1994;17:21–23, 61. [PubMed] 67. Hawkins P.N., Lachmann H.J., Aganna E., McDermott M.F. Spectrum of clinical features in Muckle-Wells syndrome and response to anakinra. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:607–612. [PubMed] 68. Hoffman H.M., et al. Prevention of cold-associated acute inflammation in familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Lancet. 2004;364:1779–1785. [PubMed] 69. Fitzgerald A.A., Leclercq S.A., Yan A., Homik J.E., Dinarello C.A. Rapid responses to anakinra in patients with refractory adult-onset Still’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1794–1803. [PubMed] 70. Pascual V., Allantaz F., Arce E., Punaro M., Banchereau J. Role of interleukin-1 (IL-1) in the pathogenesis of systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and clinical response to IL-1 blockade. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:1479–1486. [PubMed] 71. Matsubara T., et al. A severe case of chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous, articular syndrome treated with biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2314–2320. [PubMed] 72. Kalliolias G.D., Georgiou P.E., Antonopoulos I.A., Andonopoulos A.P., Liossis S.N. Anakinra treatment in patients with adult-onset Still’s disease is fast, effective, safe and steroid sparing: experience from an uncontrolled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007;66:842–843. [PubMed] 73. So A., Desmedt T., Revaz S., Tschopp J. A pilot study of IL-1 inhibition by anakinra in acute gout. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007;9:R28. [PubMed] 74. Belkhir R., et al. Treatment of familial Mediterranean fever with anakinra. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007;146:825–826. [PubMed] 75. Mariathasan S., et al. Differential activation of the inflammasome by caspase-1 adaptors ASC and Ipaf. Nature. 2004;430:213–218. [PubMed] 76. Martinon F., Burns K., Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol. Cell. 2002;10:417–426. [PubMed] 77. Kawai T., Adachi O., Ogawa T., Takeda K., Akira S. Unresponsiveness of MyD88-deficient mice to endotoxin. Immunity. 1999;11:115–122. [PubMed] 78. Labow M., et al. Absence of IL-1 signaling and reduced inflammatory response in IL-1 type I receptor-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 1997;159:2452–2461. [PubMed] 79. Hoshino K., et al. Cutting edge: generation of IL-18 receptor-deficient mice: evidence for IL-1 receptor-related protein as an essential IL-18 binding receptor. J. Immunol. 1999;162:5041–5044. [PubMed] 80. Hoshino K., et al. Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene product. J. Immunol. 1999;162:3749–3752. [PubMed] 81. Takeuchi O., et al. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity. 1999;11:443–451. [PubMed] 82. Alexopoulou L., Holt A.C., Medzhitov R., Flavell R.A. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature. 2001;413:732–738. [PubMed] 83. Takeshita F., et al. Cutting edge: role of toll-like receptor 9 in cpg dna-induced activation of human cells. J. Immunol. 2001;167:3555–3558. [PubMed] 84. Hoebe K., et al. Identification of Lps2 as a key transducer of MyD88-independent TIR signalling. Nature. 2003;424:743–748. [PubMed] 85. Arbour N.C., et al. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat. Genet. 2000;25:187–191. [PubMed] 86. Muller M., et al. Correction or transfer of immunodeficiency due to TNF-LT alpha deletion by bone marrow transplantation. Mol. Med. 1996;2:247–255. [PubMed] 87. Ryffel B., et al. Lack of type 2 T cell-independent B cell responses and defect in isotype switching in TNF-lymphotoxin alpha-deficient mice. . J. Immunol. 1997;158:2126–2133. [PubMed] 88. Okabe M., et al. ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;407:313–319. [PubMed] 89. Couillin I., et al. Arthropod-derived histamine-binding protein prevents murine allergic asthma. J. Immunol. 2004;173:3281–3286. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 16; 345(7):517-25.
[N Engl J Med. 2001]Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1993; 34 Pt B():173-81.
[Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1993]Crit Rev Immunol. 2005; 25(6):429-63.
[Crit Rev Immunol. 2005]Respir Med. 2003 Jun; 97(6):634-9.
[Respir Med. 2003]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001 May; 24(5):599-607.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001]Trends Immunol. 2003 Mar; 24(3):112-4.
[Trends Immunol. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 23; 279(17):17079-84.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Immunol. 2006 Jul 15; 177(2):1272-81.
[J Immunol. 2006]Nat Med. 2005 Nov; 11(11):1173-9.
[Nat Med. 2005]J Clin Invest. 2006 Mar; 116(3):753-9.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]J Cell Mol Med. 2004 Jul-Sep; 8(3):285-93.
[J Cell Mol Med. 2004]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001 Feb; 280(2):L316-25.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001]Trends Immunol. 2005 Aug; 26(8):447-54.
[Trends Immunol. 2005]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Feb; 4(2):95-104.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003]Nature. 2006 Mar 9; 440(7081):228-32.
[Nature. 2006]Cell. 2006 Feb 24; 124(4):783-801.
[Cell. 2006]Annu Rev Immunol. 2006; 24():353-89.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2006]Nat Med. 2005 Nov; 11(11):1173-9.
[Nat Med. 2005]J Immunol. 2005 Nov 15; 175(10):6861-9.
[J Immunol. 2005]Cell. 2006 Aug 25; 126(4):659-62.
[Cell. 2006]J Clin Invest. 2006 Aug; 116(8):2073-5.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004 Dec; 287(6):L1186-92.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22; 94(15):8093-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002 Nov 11; 1592(3):265-80.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002]Immunity. 2005 Nov; 23(5):479-90.
[Immunity. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 2; 279(14):13677-88.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Nat Immunol. 2006 Apr; 7(4):375-81.
[Nat Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2005 Nov 15; 175(10):6861-9.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Inflamm (Lond). 2006 Feb 22; 3():2.
[J Inflamm (Lond). 2006]Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006 Jul; 3(5):401-4.
[Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006]Science. 2002 Apr 5; 296(5565):155-8.
[Science. 2002]Trends Immunol. 2003 Mar; 24(3):112-4.
[Trends Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2006 Jul 15; 177(2):1272-81.
[J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2000 Aug 15; 165(4):1863-70.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Clin Invest. 2006 Mar; 116(3):753-9.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]Nat Med. 2006 Mar; 12(3):317-23.
[Nat Med. 2006]J Clin Invest. 2004 Jul; 114(2):291-9.
[J Clin Invest. 2004]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004 Dec; 287(6):L1186-92.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004]Immunity. 2005 Nov; 23(5):479-90.
[Immunity. 2005]J Leukoc Biol. 2006 Sep; 80(3):451-7.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2006]Nat Immunol. 2006 Apr; 7(4):375-81.
[Nat Immunol. 2006]Am J Pathol. 2005 Dec; 167(6):1485-96.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Clin Exp Immunol. 2001 Apr; 124(1):77-85.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 2001]Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1997 Dec; 8(4):253-65.
[Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1997]J Clin Invest. 2001 Jun; 107(12):1529-36.
[J Clin Invest. 2001]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004 Dec; 287(6):L1186-92.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004]Pathol Int. 1996 Feb; 46(2):91-9.
[Pathol Int. 1996]Radiat Res. 1996 Jun; 145(6):762-7.
[Radiat Res. 1996]Int J Exp Pathol. 1997 Feb; 78(1):43-8.
[Int J Exp Pathol. 1997]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001 Jan; 280(1):L39-49.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001]J Immunol. 2003 Jan 1; 170(1):567-74.
[J Immunol. 2003]Exp Lung Res. 1998 Nov-Dec; 24(6):721-43.
[Exp Lung Res. 1998]J Clin Invest. 1995 Jul; 96(1):250-9.
[J Clin Invest. 1995]Cytokine. 1993 Jan; 5(1):57-61.
[Cytokine. 1993]Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1994 Feb; 17(1):21-3, 61.
[Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1994]Science. 1989 Jan 20; 243(4889):393-6.
[Science. 1989]J Clin Invest. 2001 Jun; 107(12):1529-36.
[J Clin Invest. 2001]Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb; 50(2):607-12.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2004]Nature. 2004 Jul 8; 430(6996):213-8.
[Nature. 2004]Mol Cell. 2002 Aug; 10(2):417-26.
[Mol Cell. 2002]Trends Immunol. 2005 Aug; 26(8):447-54.
[Trends Immunol. 2005]Immunity. 1999 Jul; 11(1):115-22.
[Immunity. 1999]J Immunol. 1997 Sep 1; 159(5):2452-61.
[J Immunol. 1997]J Immunol. 1999 May 1; 162(9):5041-4.
[J Immunol. 1999]J Immunol. 1999 Apr 1; 162(7):3749-52.
[J Immunol. 1999]Immunity. 1999 Oct; 11(4):443-51.
[Immunity. 1999]Nat Genet. 2000 Jun; 25(2):187-91.
[Nat Genet. 2000]Mol Med. 1996 Mar; 2(2):247-55.
[Mol Med. 1996]J Immunol. 1997 Mar 1; 158(5):2126-33.
[J Immunol. 1997]FEBS Lett. 1997 May 5; 407(3):313-9.
[FEBS Lett. 1997]J Immunol. 2005 Nov 15; 175(10):6861-9.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Immunol. 2004 Sep 1; 173(5):3281-6.
[J Immunol. 2004]