![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology CCL21 Expression Pattern of Human Secondary Lymphoid Organ Stroma Is Conserved in Inflammatory Lesions with Lymphoid Neogenesis From the Rheumatology Unit,* Guy’s, King’s, and St. Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom; the Institute for Molecular Medicine,‡ John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; the Department of Rheumatology,¶ Birmingham University, Birmingham, United Kingdom; the Chair and Division of Rheumatology,† University of Pavia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; and the Institute for Research in Biomedicine,§ Bellinzona, Switzerland Accepted July 19, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract CCL21 is a homeostatic lymphoid chemokine instrumental in the recruitment and organization of T cells and dendritic cells into lymphoid T areas. In human secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs), CCL21 is produced by cells distributed throughout the T zone, whereas high endothelial venules (HEVs) lack CCL21 mRNA. A critical question remains whether the development of ectopic lymphoid tissue (ELT) in chronic inflammation recapitulates the features of SLOs. Thus, we systematically investigated in situ the cellular sources of CCL21 in SLOs and ELTs in several human diseases characterized by lymphoid neogenesis. By in situ hybridization and the use of combinatorial cell markers, we show that CCL21-producing vessels in inflamed tissues systematically display typical markers of lymphatic vessels, whereas, as in SLOs, ectopic HEVs do not synthesize detectable levels of CCL21. We also provide first-time evidence that a common pattern of CCL21 expression by CD45-negative myofibroblast-like cells localized in extra-HEV position and organized in a fibroblastic reticular network similarly characterizes human SLOs and organized ELTs. Altogether, our results demonstrate that in humans the pattern of CCL21 production in SLOs is maintained during inflammation and that the phenotypic and functional properties of stromal cells, found in SLO T-cell areas, are reproduced at ectopic sites. CCL21 is a homeostatic chemokine constitutively produced in secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) where it is involved in CCR7+ naïve and central memory T-cell homing via high endothelial venules (HEVs). CCL21 is also instrumental in the topographical compartmentalization of T cells with CCR7+ mature antigen-bearing dendritic cells (DCs) in the T-cell area.1,2,3 Here, CCL21 directly participates to the immunological synapsis, promoting T-cell co-stimulation in trans by means of a chemokine-mediated tethering and priming on DCs.4 Alongside its constitutive function in SLOs, CCL21 is also sufficient to mediate naïve cell extravasation in nonlymphoid inflamed tissues5 and to promote the constitution of ectopic lymphoid tissue (ELT) in transgenic mice.6,7,8 Accordingly, increased expression of CCL21 is strongly associated to the development of lymphoid-like structures in chronically inflamed human tissues, including the joint synovium in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), salivary glands in Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), and the intestinal mucosa in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). For a review, see Aloisi and Pujol-Borrell.9 Suggesting that CCL21 constitutive function may be ectopically reprogrammed in inflammation, CCL21-expressing cells in ELTs have been shown to compartmentalize with T-cell-rich areas and with mature DCs.10,11,12,13 Although these observations indicate the existence of a functional partnership between CCL21-producing cells with T cells and DCs in the genesis of adaptive responses, a comprehensive characterization of CCL21-producing cells in human lymphoid tissue has not been performed. It is thus unclear whether and to what extent inflammation influences the pattern of CCL21 expression in ELTs or whether the same cellular sources are responsible for CCL21 production in SLOs and ELTs.5,13,14 Although CCL21 is constitutively expressed in murine SLOs by T-zone stromal cells,15 lymphatic vessels, and HEVs16 as an expression of a species-specific difference, we and others have recently demonstrated that human SLO HEVs lack CCL21 mRNA.10,17 Instead, the chemokine is produced by lymphatics and nonendothelial cells (non-ECs) within the T area,17 and translocation of the protein through HEVs has been surmised to mediate T-cell homing,17 in keeping with the process of transcytosis previously demonstrated for CCL19.18 Conversely, as opposed to the extravascular synthesis of CCL21 in human SLOs, in inflamed peripheral tissues it has been suggested that CCL21 may be aberrantly induced in ECs of blood vessels and some HEVs, misdirecting naïve T cells to sites of inflammation and triggering the early events of lymphoid neogenesis.5 Thus, CCL21 production in inflammation would involve specific endothelial differentiation or activation pathways not shared by SLOs and potential target of selective therapies. However, CCL21 is also constitutively produced by lymphatic vessels in peripheral tissues,5,16,19 where it mediates mature DC and T-cell entry into afferent lymphatics, allowing their migration to draining lymph nodes (LNs).20,21,22,23 Importantly, CCL21-mediated exit through the lymphatics has been shown to be amplified both in experimental inflammation24 and in human skin inflammatory diseases.25 In keeping with this concept, CCL21+ lymphatic vessel neoangiogenesis has been described in association with the development of ectopic lymphoid aggregates in renal rejection,26 indicating that the constitutive cellular sources of CCL21 in peripheral tissues and SLOs can participate in CCL21 production in human ELTs. To clarify whether chronic inflammation is associated with the appearance of novel sources of CCL21, or rather the pattern of the chemokine is conserved in secondary and ectopic locations, we performed a comparative expression analysis of CCL21 in human SLOs and in a subset of chronic diseases in which immune cells accumulate and form ELTs, addressing the cellular sources of CCL21 in its constitutive environment and in inflammatory sites. We show that the lymphatic system is the source of endothelial CCL21 in inflamed peripheral tissues and that, as in SLOs, blood vessels or HEVs do not synthesize detectable levels of the chemokine in ELTs. We also show, to our knowledge for the first time, that the extra-endothelial expression of CCL21 by smooth muscle actin-positive (SMA+) stromal cells is a conserved feature in human SLOs and ELTs. Materials and Methods Tissues Synovial samples for in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (IF) were obtained from a total of 27 RA patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria27 undergoing joint replacement, synovectomy, or arthroscopic biopsy. The immunophenotypic analysis of CCL21-expressing cells was extended to other inflammatory lesions including minor salivary glands from SS (n = 21 patients), intestinal biopsies from UC (n = 10 patients) and CD (n = 6 patients), and skin biopsies from psoriasis (n = 4 patients) and lichen planus (n = 3 patients). Patient data, histopathological grading, and treatment schedules are provided in Table 1. Control materials consisted of various normal human SLOs, including two human tonsils, two human mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), two cervical lymph nodes (CLNs), two axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), and one human spleen, obtained from individuals undergoing tonsillectomy, surgical resection for neck, colon, or mammary cancer or surgical resection for abdominal trauma. All LNs were free from cancer metastasis. The constitutive pattern of CCL21 expression was also investigated in noninflamed peripheral tissues, including two normal synovial tissues collected during lower limb amputation, two normal minor salivary glands obtained from individuals with suspected amyloidosis28 (normal histology assessed by routine examination; Congo red-negative), one normal colon obtained during surgical resection for cancer at a minimum of 5 cm from the tumor (normal histology assessed by routine examination), and one normal skin sample obtained from mastectomy. All tissues were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Four additional RA synovial samples selected for the presence of lymphoid aggregates and HEVs, two human tonsils, and one MLN were embedded in OCT and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for comparative staining analysis with paraffin-embedded tissues. All procedures involving patient material were approved by the local ethics committee (code no. 08004598/b).
In Situ Hybridization 35S-labeled sense and anti-sense RNA probes were generated by in vitro transcription (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). The human CCL21 probe corresponded to positions 6 to 368 of the CCL21 sequence (accession number AB002409).29 Hybridization and detection of the hybridized probe were performed as previously described.10,30 IHC IHC on paraffin-embedded tissue sections was performed as previously described in detail.10,30 The following primary antibodies were used: goat anti-human CCL21 (IgG; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), mouse anti-human CD31 (IgG1, clone 1A10; Novocastra, Newcastle-on-Tyne, UK), mouse anti-human CD34 (IgG1, clone QBEnd/10; Novocastra), rat anti-human/mouse peripheral lymph node addressin (PNAd) (IgM, clone MECA 79; PharMingen, San Diego, CA), mouse anti-human lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE-1) (IgG1, clone 8C; provided by D.G. Jackson, Institute for Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK), goat anti-human LYVE-1 (IgG; R&D Systems), mouse anti-human podoplanin (IgG1, clone 4D5aE5E6; Bender MedSystems, Wien, Austria), rat anti-human D6 (IgG2a, clone 196124; R&D Systems), rabbit anti-human CD3 (IgG; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), mouse anti-human CD20 (IgG2a, clone L26; DAKO), mouse anti-human CD21 (IgG1, clone 1F8; DAKO), goat anti-human CXCL13 (IgG, R&D Systems), goat anti-human CCL19 (IgG, R&D Systems), mouse anti-human DC-lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP) (IgG1, clone 104-G4; Immunotech, Marseilles, France), mouse anti-human CD45 (IgG1, clones 2B11 + PD7/26; DAKO), and mouse anti-human SMA (IgG2a, clone 1A4; DAKO). Negative staining control experiments were performed either by omitting the primary antibody or by using a control isotype-matched antibody. For double-staining experiments, dewaxed and rehydrated sections were heated at 96°C in target retrieval solution (DAKO), washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), and incubated with Protein Block Serum Free (DAKO). The first primary antibody was applied, followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (DAKO). Sections were then developed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), blocked in distilled water, washed in TBS, and again incubated in Protein Block Serum Free. The second primary antibody was applied, followed by incubation with biotinylated donkey anti-goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Cambridgeshire, UK) and amplification with streptavidin biotin complex-alkaline phosphatase (DAKO). Sections were developed using New Fuchsin substrate kit (DAKO), counterstained with Meyer’s hematoxylin (Merck, Rahway, NJ) and mounted with Aquamount mounting medium (BDH, Poole, UK). Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in DAKO antibody diluent. IF Double-color IF for CCL21 and PNAd was performed on OCT-embedded frozen samples of four RA synovial membranes, two human tonsils, and one human MLN. Six-μm-thick sections were cut, allowed to dry on glass slides, and fixed for 15 minutes in acetone. Sections were then washed in TBS and incubated with Protein Block Serum Free. Rat anti-human/mouse PNAd was applied, followed by incubation with donkey anti-rat IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). After TBS washing and an additional blocking in 10% human serum diluted in TBS, goat anti-human CCL21 was applied, followed by incubations with donkey anti-goat IgG biotinylated (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and rhodamine Red-X-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Sections were counterstained using DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Sigma) and mounted with fluorescence mounting medium (DAKO). Negative staining control experiments were performed by using a control isotype-matched antibody. Double-color IF for CCL21 or CCL19 and CD45 or SMA on paraffin-embedded sections were performed analogously to IHC experiments. The following secondary antibodies were used: donkey anti-rat IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate for CD45 and SMA and donkey anti-goat IgG biotinylated followed by amplification with Red-X-conjugated streptavidin for CCL21 and CCL19 (all from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). All IF procedures were performed in darkness. Sections were examined by IF microscopy (BX51; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) and confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP2; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Histological Data Evaluation and Quantification The immunocharacterization of CCL21-producing vessels in RA synovium was performed on 3-μm-thick consecutive sections stained for pan-vascular markers (CD31 and CD34),31,32 HEV markers (PNAd),33 and a subset of markers that have been shown to be specific for the lymphatic endothelium, including LYVE-1, podoplanin, and D6.34,35,36 Because of the heterogeneous distribution of CCL21+ vessels, quantification and immunophenotypic analysis were performed in CCL21 vascular hot spots or areas containing the highest density of CCL21+ vessels, according to a method first used for the estimation of new blood vessel formation in breast tumor.37 Three hot spots per section were selected. In each spot, positive vessels were counted in 10 consecutive fields at high magnification (×400). The median number of counted CCL21+ vessels/sample in the nine samples with the presence of vascular CCL21 (see Results) was 50, with a range of 30 to 202. Of counted CCL21+ vessels 99.2% were recognized by two independent observers on serial sections stained for vascular markers. To confirm the co-localization between CCL21 and lymphatic markers on ECs, in six samples double IF stainings for CCL21 and podoplanin were performed, and vessels were examined inside and outside of hot spots. The immunocharacterization of nonendothelial CCL21-expressing cells as well as CCL19+ cells in human SLOs was assessed for each tissue in 10 consecutive high-power fields (×1000) (median number of counted CCL21+ cells/sample, 178; range, 86 to 242; median number of counted CCL19+ cells/sample, 83; range, 72 to 102). In RA synovium, attributable to heterogeneous distribution of CCL21+ and CCL19+ cells, the analysis was performed according to the hot spot method (median number of counted CCL21+ cells/sample, 43; range, 7 to 100; median number of counted CCL19+ cells/sample, 34; range, 4 to 82). The prevalence of CCL21+SMA+ cells in the synovial lymphoid tissue was evaluated in the 15 samples with lymphoid aggregates (see Results and Table 1) and expressed as the percentage of aggregates of large dimensions (radial cell count from the more centrally located vessel to the identifiable edge of the aggregate >10 cells10) positive for CCL21 and SMA. The total number of large-size aggregates counted was 269, with a median number/sample of 12 (range, 3 to 44). LN Primary Cell Separation and Cell Lines Primary cells from one normal human MLN were obtained by enzymatic digestion with 0.2% collagenase in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (GIBCO, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, Invitrogen) and 100 U/ml penicillin plus 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate (GIBCO, Invitrogen). After 4 hours of incubation at 37°C, cells were collected, washed, and used for cytospin preparations and RNA extraction. RA synovium, spleen, and LN fibroblast cell lines were kindly provided by Debbie Hardie (Department of Rheumatology, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK). IF on Cytospins Double-color IF for CCL21 and SMA on freshly isolated cells and cell lines was performed analogously to IF experiments on frozen tissue samples. Cells were fixed with 2.5% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature and permeabilized with TBS and 0.3% saponin. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Total RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions and was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with the ThermoScript reverse transcriptase-PCR system (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using Hot Start DNA polymerase (Qiagen) in the presence of 0.1× SYBR Green (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) using an Applied Biosystem 7900HT sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A serial dilution of a cDNA from human LN was used for a standard curve. Gene expression was calculated using a standard curve and normalized for the expression of the housekeeping gene β-actin. Primers used were CCL21: forward 5′-CAAGCTTAGGCTGCTCCATC-3′, reverse 5′-TCAGTCCTCTTGCAGCCTTT-3′; and β-actin: forward 5′-CACGGCTGCTTCCAGCTC-3′, reverse 5′-CACAGGACTCCATGCCCAG-3′. Results CCL21-Producing Endothelial Structures in Rheumatoid Synovitis Display Lymphatic Features In keeping with previous reports,5,10,11 we observed high expression of CCL21 in ECs of vascular structures in a proportion of RA synovial tissues. Single cutting level analysis on paraffin sections showed the presence of CCL21+ vessels in 9 of 27 samples, whereas the absence or only the occasional presence of these structures was observed in the other specimens included in the study. Parallel in situ hybridization and IHC experiments on 3-μm-thick consecutive sections demonstrated CCL21 mRNA and protein co-localization in all vessels analyzed (Figure 1, A and B)
The immunophenotypic analysis of CCL21-producing vessels revealed that all were CD31+, confirming their vascular nature (Figure 1, C and D) To exclude that synovial blood vessel ECs aberrantly expressed CCL21 only in tissues with organized lymphoid aggregates, we analyzed our samples for the presence of specific lymphoid tissue-like features (T-B cell compartmentalization and CD21+ follicular DC networks). These experiments confirmed that CCL21+ vessels both in synovial tissues with diffuse infiltration (n = 12/27, 44.4%) and in those with lymphoid aggregates, with (n = 5/27, 18.5%) or without (n = 10/27, 37.1%) detectable germinal centers (GCs), were 100% positive for LYVE-1 and podoplanin. Similarly, in tonsil paraffin sections, CCL21 was found in the cytoplasm of LYVE-1+podoplanin+ ECs displaying variable D6 expression (Figure 1, P–S) The Lymphatic Nature of CCL21+ Endothelial Structures Is a Shared Feature of Different Human Chronic Inflammatory Diseases To test whether the findings obtained in RA synovitis are applicable to other human chronic inflammatory conditions, we extended the immunocharacterization of CCL21+ vessels to other inflamed tissues. All CCL21+ endothelial structures were LYVE-1+ both in psoriasis (not shown) and in lichen planus (Figure 2, A and B)
The Peri-HEV Synthesis of CCL21 Is Reprogrammed in ELTs Although CCL21 production was not detected in HEV ECs, in some lymphoid aggregates in SS, UC, CD, and RA, CCL21-expressing cells were recognized in an extravascular location, sometimes tightly adherent to the basal side of a proportion of PNAd+ HEV. This pattern was also identified inside highly organized lymphoid clusters as inferred by the presence of follicular DC networks and CXCL13 expression (Figure 3)
To allow a comparison with formalin-fixed tissues, we performed double IF stainings for CCL21 and PNAd on cryosections. These experiments showed CCL21 protein within and at the basal side of HEVs in human SLOs (Figure 4M) SMA+ Stromal Cells Express CCL21 in Peri-HEV Location and in T-Cell-Rich Areas Both in ELTs and Human SLOs To characterize the nature of extra-endothelial CCL21-expressing cells in human SLOs and ELTs, we performed double IHC and IF staining on paraffin-embedded samples. To provide direct evidence of the hematopoietic or stromal nature of CCL21-producing cells, we first examined CCL21 and CD45 staining. These experiments demonstrated that, in human LNs and tonsils, all CCL21+ cells in close proximity to vascular structures with HEV morphology were CD45-negative. CD45-negative, CCL21+ stromal cells were also found scattered within the T-cell areas and unrelated to HEVs. Interestingly, identical results were obtained in RA synovium ELTs, where CCL21+ cells inside the aggregates were mostly CD45-negative, both in peri-HEV location and scattered within lymphoid clusters (not shown). Morphologically, most of CD45-negative CCL21+ cells both in human SLOs and in ELTs were characterized by a spindle-shaped or irregular cell body with branching processes. This pattern is strongly reminiscent to that of fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), pericytes, and myofibroblasts, different subsets of mesenchymal cells capable to trans-differentiate one into another38,39 and sharing the expression of SMA.40,41,42 We thus performed double IHC and IF experiments for CCL21 and SMA in SLOs and ELTs. In human LNs from various anatomical districts (mesenteric, cervical, axillary), we observed stringent co-localization of periendothelial CCL21 and SMA in all areas examined (Figure 5, A–E)
Results in RA ELT were consistent with those obtained in human LNs. Indeed, peri-HEV CCL21-expressing cells were all SMA+ (Figure 5, K–O) Confocal microscopy examinations confirmed CCL21 localization in the cytoplasm of SMA+ cells both in SLOs and RA ELTs (Figure 6, A–D)
SMA+ Cells in Human SLOs and ELTs Express CCL19 and Co-Localize with Mature DCs To compare additional features of SMA+ cells in SLOs and ELTs, we investigated the expression of CCL19, the other known ligand for CCR7, which has been previously reported in FRCs in murine SLOs.15 Interestingly, double IHC and IF experiments revealed the capacity of SMA+ cells both in SLOs and in RA synovium ELT to express CCL19 (Figure 7, A–H)
In keeping with Page and colleagues,11 SMA+CCL21+ cells in synovial ELT were found in close association to DC-LAMP+ mature DCs, which are known to express CCR7,43 suggesting a role for the ectopic stroma through the production of lymphoid chemokines in the regulation of local immune interactions (Figure 7I) Discussion In this article, we provide evidence that, as in human SLOs, CCL21 endothelial production in chronically inflamed tissues is confined to the lymphatic apparatus and that neither flat-walled blood vessels nor HEVs of ELTs produce detectable levels of the chemokine. Our data demonstrate that the expression pattern of CCL21 within the blood vascular system is conserved across the spectrum of human lymphoid tissues, being associated with peri-ECs. This lends further support to the notion of the existence of conserved programs regulating lymphoid structural organization in homeostasis and inflammation. In keeping with this concept, we demonstrate that extra-endothelial CCL21 is expressed by stromal cells displaying a myofibroblast-like phenotype both in human SLOs and ELTs. The characterization of CCL21-producing vessels performed in this work relies on the use of a combination of markers specific for the lymphatic endothelium that have recently become available, such as LYVE-1,34 podoplanin,35 and D6.36 CCL21+ vessels in RA synovitis all expressed LYVE-1 and podoplanin, irrespectively to their localization and association with the ELT. They also were CD31+31,32 and displayed variable levels of CD34, a pan-vascular marker that is often absent from normal tissue lymphatics but can be up-regulated in certain pathological conditions, such as in tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis.44 The combinatorial phenotype that we report here clearly indicates the lymphatic nature of CCL21+ vascular structures. In keeping with this, we demonstrated that synovial CCL21+ lymphatics can express variable levels of D6, a lymphatic promiscuous chemokine receptor that functions as a scavenger receptor for the internalization and neutralization of inflammatory chemokines.36,45 By demonstrating the lymphatic nature of CCL21-producing vessels in a subset of inflamed peripheral tissues from different diseases and of different embryological origin, we provide evidence that chronic inflammation and ectopic lymphoid neogenesis are not intrinsically associated with aberrant up-regulation of CCL21 in blood vessel and HEV endothelium. This result is in keeping with the notion that human SLO HEVs, differently from mouse, do not synthesize the chemokine10,17 and suggests the existence of a common organizational program active in human SLOs and ELTs. Supporting this point of view, our data indicate that, inside ectopic lymphoid aggregates of inflamed peripheral tissues, the distribution of CCL21 reproduces the anatomical relationship with HEVs characterizing human SLOs,10,17 with periendothelial localization of CCL21-producing cells and possible luminal localization of the protein through transcytosis.17 Passive absorption or transcytosis might thus explain the decoration of some blood vessels with CCL21 that was noticed here and in previous reports when frozen sections are used46,47,48 and justify the presence of naïve cells demonstrated in inflammatory sites.5 It should be emphasized that our results do not exclude that a low rate of CCL21 transcription can be present in inflamed blood vessels, as postulated by Carlsen and colleagues17 in SLO HEV. However, the data reported here, based on the analysis of different tissues from different diseases, demonstrate that the level of expression of CCL21 in the blood vascular compartment is similar between SLOs and ELTs and that aberrant up-regulation of CCL21 in the blood vessel endothelium is not a systematic feature of human chronic inflammation. One of the main differences between SLOs and ELTs is the fact that, whereas SLOs also function to maintain immunosurveillance under homeostatic conditions, ELT development and function is triggered by pathological and immunological stimuli. We thus considered the possibility that, although CCL21-producing cells share a similar relationship with T cells and HEVs, the cellular sources of the chemokine could be different in terms of their stromal or hematopoietic origin in SLOs and ELTs. Our data demonstrate that CCL21 is expressed by CD45−, SMA+ cells both in SLOs and ELTs, indicating a common stromal origin of these cellular subsets. This pattern, which constituted the bulk of CCL21 expression in human LNs and in RA ELT, was less developed in tonsils where CCL21+ SMA-negative cells were frequently observed, indicating that myofibroblast precursors or other cell types, such as DCs, may contribute to CCL21 production in specific conditions.14,46,49 The existence of additional levels of regulation controlling SMA and CCL21 expression was also emphasized by the fact that both in normal as well as in inflamed tissues SMA+ cells can be recognized in the absence of CCL21. Our data, combined with previous observations in mice,15 also provide evidence that, differently from ECs, the extravascular cellular sources of CCL21 are not only conserved across human lymphoid tissues but also across species. Indeed, it has been shown that in murine SLOs, the cell type responsible for CCL21 production is represented by gp38+ FRCs that ensheathe the meshwork of collagen fibers (lymphoid reticular network) extending from the capsule throughout the node and encircling HEVs15 and providing a tight regulation of chemokine and antigen delivery within SLOs.40,50 Further studies have shown that murine FRCs also express CCL19,15 ERTR7,51 desmin, and SMA,40 a reliable marker of myofibroblasts.42 Although the specific features of this apparatus in human SLOs have been less extensively investigated,39,52 our observations strongly indicate that CD45−, CCL21+, SMA+ fibroblastoid cells, which we have identified in human SLOs, represent FRCs as suggested by their phenotypic marker expression, their dendroid morphology, and their reticular distribution throughout the T area and among the subcapsular sinus and HEVs. The inability to detect CCL21 expression in human SLO SMA+ fibroblast cell lines in basal conditions or on in vitro stimulation with tumor necrosis factor-α and lymphotoxin, which have been shown to be required for normal expression of CCL21 in mouse spleen,53 is in keeping with previous reports in murine LN FRCs.51 This suggests that human myofibroblast-like cells may lose the capacity to express CCL21 because of in vitro transdifferentiation or, alternatively, that cell-contact-dependent interactions are required for the process to take place. To our knowledge, no data at present demonstrate the possible developmental plasticity of the FRC network in human ELTs, despite experimental models of ectopic lymphoid neogenesis indicating that gp38+ and ERTR7+ stromal cell networks can arise ectopically, such as in the pancreas of CCL21 and CXCL13 transgenic mice.7,54 The recognition that the stromal scaffold of the ELT in RA can acquire CCL21, CCL19, and SMA expression associated with the organization in an intra-aggregate meshwork connecting and encircling vascular structures indicates that a vestige of the lymphoid FRC network can be induced in human inflammation. Consistent with this, increased myofibroblast conversion has been reported in synovial fibroblasts derived from high-inflammation tissues in association to high expression of T cell/B cell and antigen-presenting cell genes.55 Further ultrastructural studies are required to understand the actual competence of SMA+ fibroblastoid cells to organize functional networks and mediate antigen and chemokine delivery in human inflammatory ELTs. In conclusion, our results indicate that CCL21 production in inflamed tissues is promoted by amplification of physiological mechanisms and ectopic reprogramming of SLO constitutive bioactivities. Our data, combined with the recent demonstration of the co-stimulatory capacity of CCL21 in T-DC interactions,4 also emphasize the role of the tissue stroma as a third actor in the constitution of the immunological synapsis in human lymphoid tissue, suggesting the mechanisms of lymphatic and smooth muscle-positive myofibroblast differentiation in inflammation as a possible tool to interfere specifically with peripheral adaptive immune responses. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Professor Costantino Pitzalis, M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.P., Head of Centre, Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, 2nd Floor, John Vane Science Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, St. Bartholomew’s and Royal London School of Medicine, London E1 2AD UK. E-mail: pitzalis/at/qmul.ac.uk. Supported by the Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Charity, the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, the Arthritis Research Campaign, the Helmut Horten Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the European Commission-6th Framework Programme for Research (Innochem). A.M. and S.B. contributed equally to this work. Current address of A.M.: Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, John Vane Science Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, St. Bartholomew’s and Royal London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
J Exp Med. 1999 Feb 1; 189(3):451-60.
[J Exp Med. 1999]J Immunol. 2001 Jan 1; 166(1):361-9.
[J Immunol. 2001]J Exp Med. 1998 Jul 6; 188(1):181-91.
[J Exp Med. 1998]Nat Immunol. 2006 Oct; 7(10):1101-8.
[Nat Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2003 May 1; 170(9):4638-48.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2003 May 1; 170(9):4638-48.
[J Immunol. 2003]Gut. 2006 Feb; 55(2):220-7.
[Gut. 2006]Gastroenterology. 2003 Oct; 125(4):1060-76.
[Gastroenterology. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7; 97(23):12694-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 6; 95(1):258-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Eur J Immunol. 2005 May; 35(5):1347-59.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Blood. 2005 Jul 15; 106(2):444-6.
[Blood. 2005]J Exp Med. 2001 May 7; 193(9):1105-12.
[J Exp Med. 2001]Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar; 31(3):315-24.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1988]Arthritis Rheum. 1993 May; 36(5):691-7.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1997 Aug 1; 272(31):19518-24.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Eur J Immunol. 2005 May; 35(5):1347-59.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov; 52(11):3448-59.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2005]Eur J Immunol. 2005 May; 35(5):1347-59.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov; 52(11):3448-59.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2005]J Histochem Cytochem. 1998 Feb; 46(2):165-76.
[J Histochem Cytochem. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10; 99(25):16069-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]J Cell Biol. 1991 Jul; 114(2):343-9.
[J Cell Biol. 1991]J Cell Biol. 1999 Feb 22; 144(4):789-801.
[J Cell Biol. 1999]Am J Pathol. 1999 Feb; 154(2):385-94.
[Am J Pathol. 1999]Eur J Immunol. 2005 May; 35(5):1347-59.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]J Immunol. 2003 May 1; 170(9):4638-48.
[J Immunol. 2003]Eur J Immunol. 2005 May; 35(5):1347-59.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]J Immunol. 2002 May 15; 168(10):5333-41.
[J Immunol. 2002]Blood. 2005 Jul 15; 106(2):444-6.
[Blood. 2005]Blood. 2005 Jul 15; 106(2):444-6.
[Blood. 2005]Arthritis Res Ther. 2005; 7(5):R1113-23.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2003 Jul; 163(1):165-74.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]Immunity. 2005 Jan; 22(1):19-29.
[Immunity. 2005]J Histochem Cytochem. 1989 Mar; 37(3):315-21.
[J Histochem Cytochem. 1989]J Pathol. 2003 Jul; 200(4):500-3.
[J Pathol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7; 97(23):12694-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]J Immunol. 2002 May 15; 168(10):5333-41.
[J Immunol. 2002]J Immunol. 1998 Sep 15; 161(6):3096-102.
[J Immunol. 1998]J Cell Biol. 1999 Feb 22; 144(4):789-801.
[J Cell Biol. 1999]Am J Pathol. 1999 Feb; 154(2):385-94.
[Am J Pathol. 1999]Am J Pathol. 2001 Mar; 158(3):867-77.
[Am J Pathol. 2001]J Histochem Cytochem. 1998 Feb; 46(2):165-76.
[J Histochem Cytochem. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10; 99(25):16069-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Eur J Immunol. 2005 May; 35(5):1347-59.
[Eur J Immunol. 2005]Blood. 2005 Jul 15; 106(2):444-6.
[Blood. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2002 Apr; 160(4):1445-55.
[Am J Pathol. 2002]J Immunol. 2003 Jun 15; 170(12):6320-8.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2006 May 15; 176(10):5735-9.
[J Immunol. 2006]Gastroenterology. 2003 Oct; 125(4):1060-76.
[Gastroenterology. 2003]Am J Pathol. 2002 Apr; 160(4):1445-55.
[Am J Pathol. 2002]Immunol Cell Biol. 2005 Oct; 83(5):525-35.
[Immunol Cell Biol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7; 97(23):12694-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Immunity. 2005 Jan; 22(1):19-29.
[Immunity. 2005]J Exp Med. 2000 Nov 20; 192(10):1425-40.
[J Exp Med. 2000]J Exp Med. 2004 Sep 20; 200(6):783-95.
[J Exp Med. 2004]J Pathol. 2003 Jul; 200(4):500-3.
[J Pathol. 2003]J Immunol. 2002 Jul 1; 169(1):424-33.
[J Immunol. 2002]Immunity. 2000 May; 12(5):471-81.
[Immunity. 2000]Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb; 52(2):430-41.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2005]Nat Immunol. 2006 Oct; 7(10):1101-8.
[Nat Immunol. 2006]Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Feb; 37(2):217-29.
[Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974]J Immunol. 2003 May 1; 170(9):4638-48.
[J Immunol. 2003]