• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC Oct 29, 2007.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2043144
NIHMSID: NIHMS30336

Asymmetric Broca’s area in great apes

A region of the ape brain is uncannily similar to one linked with speech in humans.

Brodmann’s area 44 delineates part of Broca’s area within the inferior frontal gyrus of the human brain and is a critical region for speech production1,2, being larger in the left hemisphere than in the right14 — an asymmetry that has been correlated with language dominance2,3. Here we show that there is a similar asymmetry in this area, also with left-hemisphere dominance, in three great ape species (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus and Gorilla gorilla). Our findings suggest that the neuroanatomical substrates for left-hemisphere dominance in speech production were evident at least five million years ago and are not unique to hominid evolution.

To our knowledge, no one has assessed whether there is any consistent left–right anatomical asymmetry in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) of any non-human primate. This is surprising because it is known from cytoarchitectonic and electrical stimulation studies that many non-human primates, including the great apes5,6, possess a homologue of area 44. We have therefore investigated whether homologous neuro-anatomical asymmetries are present in area 44 in great apes.

From magnetic resonance images (MRI) obtained from 20 chimpanzees (P. troglodytes), 5 bonobos (P. paniscus) and 2 gorillas (G. gorilla; Fig. 1a), we found that area 44 in these species shows a pattern of morphological asymmetry that has left-hemisphere surface-area predominance similar to the homologous cortical area of humans (mean left, 127.7 mm2±8.1 s.e.; mean right, 104.2 mm2±6.1 s.e.; F(1,25) = 7.45, P=0.011; see supplementary information for details of the statistical analysis, and see Fig. 1b for individual asymmetry measures). In humans, this region is part of Broca’s area, a key anatomical substrate for speech functions, particularly in motor aspects of speech such as articulation and fluency2,7.

Figure 1
Asymmetry of Brodmann’s area 44 in great apes. a, Area 44 (shown in red in the two hemispheres of a chimpanzee brain), which is defined as the portion of cortical surface of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) bounded by the fronto-orbital (FO) and ...

The part possession by great apes of a homologue of Broca’s area is puzzling, particularly considering the discrepancy between sophisticated human speech and the primitive vocalizations of great apes. This may be explained by the contribution that gestures have made to the evolution of human language and speech8. In monkeys, the so-called ‘mirror neurons’ in area 44 seem to subserve the imitation of hand grasping and manipulation, and this neural system may have been specialized initially for gestural and later for vocal communication9. In captive great apes, manual gestures are both referential and intentional10,11, and are preferentially produced by the right hand (which is controlled by the left hemisphere). This right-hand bias is consistently greater when gesturing is accompanied by vocalization10.

From an evolutionary standpoint, therefore, asymmetry in area 44 may be associated with the production of gestures accompanied by vocalizations in great apes, an ability that eventually selected for the development of speech systems in modern humans and perhaps generated more cortical folding in the IFG, leading to expansion of Brodmann’s area 45 in the human brain.

Whatever the function of area 44 in great apes, our finding that these species show a human-like asymmetry not only in posterior (such as the planum temporale12,13) but also in frontal regions, indicates that the origin of asymmetry in language-related areas of the human brain should be interpreted in evolutionary terms rather than being confined to the human species.

Supplementary Material

STable1

Footnotes

Supplementary information accompanies this communication on Nature’s website (www.nature.com).

References

1. Galaburda AM. In: Cerebral Dominance: The Biological Foundations. Geschwind N, Galaburda AM, editors. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1984. pp. 11–25.
2. Foundas AL, Eure KF, Luevano LF, Weinberger DR. Brain Lang. 1998;64:282–296. [PubMed]
3. Amunts K, Schleicher A, Bürgel U, Mohlberg H, Uylings HB, Zilles K. J Comp Neurol. 1999;412:319–341. [PubMed]
4. Broca P. Bull Soc Anat Paris. 1861;2:330–357.
5. von Bonin G. In: The Precentral Motor Cortex. Bucy PC, editor. Univ. Illinois Press; Urbana-Champaign: 1949. pp. 7–82.
6. Bailey P, von Bonin G, McCulloch WS. The Isocortex of the Chimpanzee. Univ. Illinois Press; Urbana-Champaign: 1950.
7. Luria AR. Traumatic Aphasia. Mouton; The Hague: 1970.
8. Corballis MC. Cognition. 1992;44:197–226. [PubMed]
9. Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:188–194. [PubMed]
10. Hopkins WD, Leavens DA. J Comp Psychol. 1998;112:95–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Hostetter AB, Cantero M, Hopkins WD. J Comp Psychol. (in the press)
12. Gannon PJ, Holloway RL, Broadfield DC, Braun AR. Science. 1998;279:220–222. [PubMed]
13. Hopkins WD, Marino L, Rilling JK, MacGregor LA. NeuroReport. 1998;9:2913–2918. [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...