![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Endoglin is required for myogenic differentiation potential of neural crest stem cells 1Center for Molecular Medicine, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Scarborough, Maine 04074 4Corresponding Author: Center for Molecular Medicine; Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 81 Research Drive, Scarborough, ME 04074; USA; Telephone (207) 885-8148; Fax (207) 885-8179; Email varyc/at/mmc.org 2Current address: Dept. of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215. 3Current address: Department of Cell Biology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294. 5These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract Genetic studies show that TGFβ signaling is essential for vascular development, although the mechanism through which this pathway operates is incompletely understood. Here we demonstrate that the TGFβ auxiliary coreceptor endoglin (eng, CD105) is expressed in a subset of neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) in vivo and is required for their myogenic differentiation. Overexpression of endoglin in the neural crest caused pericardial hemorrhaging, correlating with altered vascular smooth muscle cell investment in the walls of major vessels and upregulation of smooth muscle α-actin protein levels. Clonogenic differentiation assay of NCSCs derived from neural tube explants demonstrated that only NCSC expressing high levels of endoglin (NCSCCD105+) had myogenic differentiation potential. Furthermore, myogenic potential was deficient in NCSCs obtained from endoglin null embryos. Expression of endoglin in NCSCs declined with age, coinciding with a reduction in both smooth muscle differentiation potential and TGFβ1 responsiveness. These findings demonstrate a cell autonomous role for endoglin in smooth muscle cell specification contributing to vascular integrity. Keywords: Endoglin, Neural Crest, Transforming growth factor beta, Myogenesis, cardiovascular Introduction Endoglin is an auxiliary receptor that interacts with the TGFβ signaling receptors (Barbara et al., 1999; Cheifetz et al., 1992). Endoglin null embryos die by E11.5 due to defects in vessel formation (Arthur et al., 2000; Bourdeau et al., 1999; Li et al., 1999) characterized by a failure of vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) recruitment and loss of expression of the SMC differentiation marker smooth muscle alpha actin (α-SMA) (Li et al., 1999), whereas endothelial cells appear normal. Endoglin is expressed in stem cell populations including hematopoietic, mesenchymal, and neural stem cells (Chen et al., 2002; Vogel et al., 2003; Zvaifler et al., 2000). Furthermore, endoglin is upregulated in SMCs in response to vascular injury (Ma et al., 2000) and in human atherosclerotic vascular SMCs (Conley et al., 2000). Mutations in both endoglin and the type I TGFβ receptor ALK1 cause hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) types 1 and 2 respectively, disorders characterized by vessel fragility and arteriovenous malformation (McAllister et al., 1994; Pece et al., 1997) suggesting that these proteins play a critical role in vascular homeostasis. TGFβ ligands and receptors play important roles in the specification and development of neural crest-derived cell types (Choudhary et al., 2006; Kaartinen et al., 2004; Shah et al., 1996; Wurdak et al., 2005). The neural crest is a heterogeneous cell population derived from the neural tube and contributes to multiple vital developmental processes. Within the neural crest, a population of cells expressing low affinity nerve growth factor receptor (p75) and lacking expression of myelin P0 protein
Previously, we reported that NCSCs become progressively more gliogenic and less neurogenic with age (Kubu et al., 2002). This transition reflects a decrease in sensitivity to BMP2, and an increase in sensitivity to Delta-Fc. These changes involve altered expression of the BMP type I receptor ALK3 and Notch1 (Kubu et al., 2002; White et al., 2001). Interestingly, NCSCs retain SMC differentiation potential in the presence of both BMP and Delta-Fc, demonstrating that the altered balance between gliogenic and neurogenic fates does not affect SMC differentiation potential. While the age-related loss of neurogenic potential is characterized, the effects of age on SMC myogenic potential of NCSCs remain unknown. Based on the report of SMC defects in endoglin null embryos combined with the previous observation of upregulation of endoglin expression in diseased vascular SMCs and in response to injury, we investigated the hypothesis that endoglin plays a cell autonomous role in vascular SMC development and maintenance of vascular integrity. Materials and Methods Endoglin knockout and transgenic mouse studies Endoglin null C57Bl6 mice were kindly provided by Dr. D. Marchuk (Arthur et al., 2000). Transgenic mouse embryos used in this study were maintained on an FVB background. Mice were maintained according to the NIH standards established in the “Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals”. Protocols and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Maine Medical Center Research Institute. Full length human endoglin cDNA was blunt end ligated into the CAGCAT vector (Yamauchi et al., 1999). Microinjection into fertilized FVB oocytes and other surgical procedures were performed as described (Hofmann et al., 1988). The genotypes of all offspring were analyzed by PCR as well as by chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which was used to normalize the transgene locus CAT activity levels prior to establishment of mouse lines. The Wnt1cre driver mouse was used to achieve conditional expression of endoglin in neural crest stem cells (Jiang et al., 2000). Mating of Wnt1cre with TgEngloxP generated Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP embryos that were genotyped using PCR primers as previously described (Chytil et al., 2002). Briefly, yolk sac genomic DNA was amplified for 35 cycles (94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1.5 min, 72°C for 2 min) in a thermal cycler. The primers were GCTGGTTAGCACCGCAGGTGTAGAG and CGCCATCTTCCAGCAGGCGCACC in the cre coding region and CAGAGTGTCCCCATCCGT and TGGGTATGGGTACTGTGTAGAAGT in the endoglin coding region. Conditional inactivation of Smad4 with simultaneous activation of human endoglin was achieved by breeding Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP on to the Smad4 heterozygous background (Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP;Sm4n/+), and subsequently intercrossing this strain with the Smad4 conditional strain (SM4c/c) (Chu et al., 2004). Embryos of two different genotypes resulting from this mating were analyzed: Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP;Sm4c/+ and Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP;Sm4n/c. The latter configuration is sensitized to conditional inactivation as Wnt1cre-mediated recombination of only a single allele is required to render the Smad4 locus null. This strategy was previously used for complete inactivation of the Smad4 locus in embryonic tissues (Chu et al., 2004). Histological analysis X-gal staining was performed according to standard procedures (Hogan et al., 1994). For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and subsequently dehydrated through a graded ethanol series and paraffin embedded. Five μm sections were stained with H&E for morphological analysis or immunohistochemistry was performed using the following antibodies: PECAM (BD Pharmingen) 1:3000, AP-conjugated α-SMA (Sigma) 1:50, SOX-10 (1:1), and HNK-1 (1:1) (Anderson and Axel, 1986). PECAM staining was performed using the TSA Biotin kit (PerkinElmer) with trypsin antigen retrieval per manufacturer’s instructions. IHC for endoglin was performed using α-human endoglin (SN6h) 1:500 (Dako). This anti-human endoglin antibody was raised against human endoglin, and was selected for its preferential recognition of human endoglin. This reagent preferentially detects human endoglin (Rodriguez-Pena et al., 2002), which was utilized to generate the transgene. Histological staining for α-SMA, SOX-10, and HNK-1 was performed using the Avidin/Biotin kit (Vector Labs) with citrate buffer antigen retrieval (Dako) following the manufacturer’s instructions. SOX-10 immunofluorescence was conducted using Alexa-645 labeled anti-mouse antibody (Molecular Probes) at 1:100 dilution for 1 hour. Fluorescence was imaged using an Axioskop 2 Plus microscope fitted with an AxioCam MRm camera (Zeiss). Immunohistochemistry using α-phospho Smad 1/5/8 (anti-pSmad 1/5/8) and α-phospho Smad 2/3 antibody (anti-pSmad 2/3, Cell Signaling Technology) 1:1000 was performed with citrate retrieval and the TSA signal amplification system (Perkin Elmer). Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Embryos were harvested at E11.5. Whole embryos were dissociated by passing through a 1 mL syringe into RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 1.0% Triton-X100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and processed as described (Koleva et al., 2006). Bound antibodies were visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham). Anti-human endoglin antibody Clone 35 at 1:2000 (BD Transduction) does not efficiently detect mouse endoglin (Rodriguez-Pena et al., 2002), and was used to demonstrate cre-recombination and over expression of the human endoglin transgene in the TgEngloxP embryos. Endogenous levels of α-SMA and Flk-1 were detected using α-SMA antibody at 1:1000 (Sigma) and α-Flk-1 antibody at 1:200 (Santa Cruz) respectively. Neural Crest Cell culture NCSCs were isolated by the method of Stemple (Stemple and Anderson, 1992). In short, neural tubes from E10.5 rat or E9.5 mouse embryos were isolated between presumptive limb buds and plated on 35 mm fibronectin-coated dishes. Crest cells were allowed to migrate away from the tube overnight in a defined medium containing 10% chick embryo extract (CEE). Neural tubes were then removed using a tungsten needle (Morrison et al., 2000). Explant cells were trypsinized and plated at clonal density (50 cells per 35 mm dish) in a growth factor rich medium containing 15% CEE (Morrison et al., 2000) that enhances autonomic phenotype production (referred to as Morrison medium). To identify NCSCs, the cells were live labeled with the 192IgG p75 antibody (Chandler et al., 1982), and the P0 monoclonal antibody against the peripheral myelin protein, P0, was conjugated to phycoerythrin (gift of J. Achelos, Munich).
In polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments, trypsinized crest explants were plated at 500 cells per dish and labeled with the p75 and P0 antibodies. E14 sciatic nerve-derived NCSCs were isolated and cultured according to the method of Morrison (Morrison et al., 1999). Sciatic nerves isolated from E14 embryos, P1 rat pups, and adult (greater than 6 weeks) rats were enzymatically dissociated and labeled with the p75 antibody conjugated to fluorescein and the P0 monoclonal antibody conjugated to phycoerythrin. Cells were sorted using a FACSVantage flow cytometer. The
Clonogenic assays Clonogenic assays were performed according to the original method of Stemple (Stemple and Anderson, 1992). Briefly, NCSCs were plated at clonal density and cultured for up to 14 days in Morrison medium. The resulting clones were fixed in acid ethanol and stained with antibodies against peripherin (Chemicon AB1530, Temecula, CA) to detect neurons (N), α-SMA (Sigma A-2547, St. Louis, MO) to detect myofibroblasts (M), and anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody (Chemicon AB 5040) to detect Schwann cells (S). Clones were scored based on the appearance of just one phenotypic representative (Stemple and Anderson, 1992). The number and percentage of clones containing neurons only (N), glial cells only (G), myofibroblasts only (M), combinations of (N+G), (N+M), (N+G+M), and (G+M) were scored at day 14 unless stated otherwise. Also scored was the production of each representative phenotype in each clone to complement our clonal population assay. Retroviral mediated gene transfer and reconstitution studies Over expression of the genes of interest in NCSCs was achieved by retroviral-mediated gene transfer as described (Verdi and Anderson, 1994). Endoglin was cloned into the pWzl retrovirus (Pear et al., 1993), as previously described (Conley et al., 2004). Virus was produced using the EcoPac-293 packaging cell line (ClonTech). On the day before transfection, the EcoPac-293 cells were split and plated at 2×106 cells per 60 mm dish in DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum. Effectine (Promega) mediated transfection was used to introduce constructs harboring the genes of interest into the packaging cell line. Virus was collected for the next 72 hours, at which time the virus-containing medium was divided in half and concentrated according to the method of Cepko (Cepko et al., 1998). The resulting viral pellet was resuspended in Morrison medium minus CEE. The concentrated viral stock was added to the NCSC cultures in the presence of 4 μg/ml polybrene. Two 2-hour rounds of infection were conducted. Thereafter, the cells were washed, split to clonal density, Morrison medium was applied and clonogenic differentiation assays were conducted. Infection efficiencies as measured by GFP or RFP expression ranged from a low of 3% to a high of over 12%. RT-PCR Total RNA was isolated using the RNA micro-isolation kit (Stratagene). The RNA was treated with DNAse to remove potential genomic contamination and reprecipitated. The resulting RNA was oligo-dT primed and reverse transcribed using superscript II as previously described (Verdi and Anderson, 1994). PCR was performed in the linear range of amplification for each primer set, as empirically determined using total RNA from 50 and 500 cell equivalents. Primers were chosen to have an annealing temperature of approximately 55°C with a 50-60% GC content. The primers were chosen to span an intron/exon border to avoid amplification of any residual genomic DNA Results Endoglin is expressed in the neural crest, in areas along the A/P axis that give rise to vascular smooth muscle cells Endoglin targeted (eng-/-) embryos die by E11.5 due to defects in angiogenesis and cardiac morphogenesis resulting in septation defects suggesting a loss of endocardial to mesenchymal transitions and a possible absence of vascular SMCs (Li et al., 1999). This interpretation was suggested by a loss of α-SMA staining in eng-/- embryos, however α-SMA is first detected in wild type embryos at E11.5 and therefore it is unclear whether loss of endoglin results in a delay or loss of SMC specification and/or differentiation. Since many of the SMCs that invest the large vessels and form the cardiac cushions are derived from the neural crest (Jiang et al., 2000), we sought to characterize a role for endoglin in the neural crest by determining whether endoglin is expressed in neural crest cells in vivo. Using the heterozygous eng mouse with the β-galactosidase cDNA expressed from the eng locus (Arthur et al., 2000), we observed endoglin-expressing cells surrounding the neural tube, a location typical for neural crest cells (Fig. 1A
Vascular defects are associated with endoglin over expression in the neural crest To determine if eng-/- embryos exhibit defective SMC specification or differentiation, we performed converse in vivo gain of function analysis to determine if increased endoglin expression affected the specification or differentiation of SMCs derived from the neural crest. For these studies, we generated a cre-inducible transgenic mouse line conditionally expressing endoglin (TgEngloxP) (Fig. 2A
Histological analysis of serial transverse sections through the outflow tract and major vessels revealed hemorrhaging into the pericardial cavity (Figs. 2F,H Endoglin over expression does not effect the migration of NCSCs Previous work implicates endoglin in the regulation of cell migration (Conley et al., 2004; Guerrero-Esteo et al., 1999), and therefore we determined if the vascular defects were due to inhibition of migration of neural crest-derived SMC precursors to major vessels and the outflow tract of the developing heart. TgEngloxP mice were bred with R26R mice bearing a cre-inducible LacZ reporter (TgEngloxP;R26R) (Jiang et al., 2000; Soriano, 1999). These mice were subsequently bred to the Wnt1cre driver, to label endoglin-over expressing neural crest cells and their derivatives. Analysis of transverse sections through the heart region of E12.5 embryos revealed little effect of endoglin over expression on the number of neural crest cells in this region using this technique (Figs. 3A-E
Endoglin over expression in NCSCs results in aberrant vascular SMC development The loss of blood vessel integrity in Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP embryos could be due to a disturbance in development of the vascular SMC layer. Indeed, examination of the major vessels surrounding the hearts of E12.5 Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP;R26R embryos using the SMC marker, α-SMA and the endothelial specific marker, PECAM revealed disorganization of SMCs (Figs. 3F,G The effects of endoglin over expression on neural crest-derived SMCs are potentially Smad-independent Neural crest smooth muscle specification is thought to be regulated by TGFβ- and Smad-dependent signaling (Chen and Lechleider, 2004). Because endoglin acts as an auxiliary cell-surface receptor that interacts with TGFβ and BMP ligands (Barbara et al., 1999), we wanted to ascertain whether the cardiovascular defects in Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP embryos could be directly due to hyperactivation of TGFβ or BMP signaling. Therefore, we looked to see if endoglin was effecting Smad activation. The degree of activation of BMP and TGFβ signaling in neural crest-derived structures was assayed by immunohistochemical staining for phosphorylated forms of the Smad transcription factors, which are the most thoroughly characterized effectors of TGFβ signaling. Immunohistochemistry using an antibody that recognizes the phosphorylated receptor-restricted Smads, pSmad 1/5/8, which mediate BMP signaling (Figs. 4A,B
To verify that the effect of endoglin over expression in the neural crest is independent of hyperactivation of the canonical TGFβ and BMP signaling pathways, we generated compound mutant mice in which endoglin was over expressed and Smad4 was simultaneously inactivated in neural crest cells (Wnt1cre;Sm4c/n;TgEngloxP) (Chu et al., 2004). Smad4 is required for the canonical signaling responses to the TGFβ-, activin- and BMP-related ligands (Shi and Massague, 2003), and represents a tractable target for conditional inactivation of Smad-dependent TGFβ receptor signaling. If endoglin over expression hyperactivated canonical TGFβ signaling, we predicted that inactivation of Smad4 should ameliorate the cardiovascular defects seen when endoglin is over expressed in NCSCs. However, if endoglin were operating in a distinct pathway, inactivation of Smad4 would either have no effect on, or could exacerbate the Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP phenotype. Indeed, we found exacerbation of the Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP phenotype upon simultaneous inactivation of Smad4. Wnt1cre;Sm4c/n;TgEngloxP embryos demonstrated characteristic defects in the outflow tract, persistent truncus arteriosus, in which there was a loss of septation of the aorta and pulmonary trunk which form the outflow tract (Fig. 4H Endoglin expression affects SMC specification To further understand the role of endoglin in SMC differentiation from neural crest, we performed whole embryo immunoprecipitation of α-SMA at E11.5 followed by immunoblot analysis. Immunoblotting demonstrated that total protein levels of α-SMA were consistently higher in the Wnt1cre;TgEngloxP embryos compared to the wild type control embryos (Fig. 4I Endoglin is required for SMC differentiation potential of NCSCs To further understand the functional role of endoglin in SMC differentiation from neural crest stem cells, we performed clonogenic differentiation assays (Stemple and Anderson, 1992). The SMC differentiation potential of
Reconstitution of endoglin expression restores SMC differentiation potential in NCSCCD105- The observation that NCSCCD105- were impaired in their capacity for SMC differentiation established a correlation between the levels of endoglin expression and SMC differentiation potential. Interestingly, reconstitution of endoglin expression in NCSCCD105- by retroviral transduction restored SMC differentiation potential, compared to either control-transduced or uninfected NCSCCD105- (Fig. 5B Endoglin null NCSCs exhibit loss of SMC potential We next sought to determine whether endoglin was required for the myogenic differentiation potential of NCSCs. To address this question, NCSCs were isolated from E9.5 eng-/-, eng+/-, and wild type (eng+/+) neural tube explants. Clonogenic differentiation assays demonstrated that eng-/- NCSCs were deficient in their SMC differentiation potential as compared to eng+/+ and eng+/- clones (Fig. 5C NCSCs undergo age-related loss of SMC differentiation potential and endoglin expression As previously described, the neurogenic potential of NCSCs decreases as gliogenic potential increases during development (Kubu et al., 2002; White et al., 2001). Therefore, we determined whether myogenic potential of NCSCs was also affected during development and in the adult. Comparison of the myogenic potential of NCSCs derived from E10.5 neural tube explants and E12.5 and adult (>6 weeks) sciatic nerve explants showed that in adult NCSCs, there was a significant (p≤.025) decline in ability to form M-Containing clones into adulthood compared with those isolated at E10.5. This result suggested that myogenic potential decreased with age (Fig. 6A
Studies addressing NCSC maturation demonstrated quantitative changes in the expression of genes in the pathways involved in instructive signaling events (Kubu et al., 2002; White et al., 2001). The loss of neurogenic potential is associated with a loss of the expression of the BMP type I receptor ALK3, and enhanced gliogenic differentiation is correlated with an increase in Notch expression (Kubu et al., 2002; Morrison et al., 1999; White et al., 2001). Therefore, we asked whether there is a similar age-related decline in TGFβ signaling components and subsequent SMC differentiation potential of NCSCs. Interestingly, the age-related loss of SMC differentiation potential in NCSCs did not correlate with changes in mRNA levels of the type I receptors for TGFβ1, ALK1, or ALK5 which remained unchanged (Fig. 6D Taken together, these findings demonstrate that endoglin expression decreases with age in NCSCs, which correlates with a decrease in responsiveness to TGFβ1 and SMC differentiation potential. Discussion Appropriate specification of stem cell fates is essential for normal vertebrate development. NCSCs give rise to a variety of cell types, including neurons, glia, and the SMCs of the major vessels and outflow tract of the heart (Fig. 7
Furthermore, we showed that similar to neurogenic differentiation potential of NCSCs, SMC differentiation potential decreased with age. However, the loss of potential correlated with a loss of endoglin expression, not with loss of the TGFβ type I receptors ALK1 or ALK5. These data agree with recent findings that human mesenchymal stem cells expressing endoglin demonstrated the capacity for SMC differentiation potential (Roura et al., 2006), suggesting that endoglin may have a general role in SMC differentiation of stem cell populations. Endoglin has been extensively studied in endothelial cells; however, an important role in SMC differentiation is suggested by the phenotype of the null mouse (Arthur et al., 2000; Bourdeau et al., 1999; Li et al., 1999). Eng-/- embryos die by E11.5 due to defects in angiogenesis characterized by failure of SMC differentiation and investment accompanied by normal endothelial development (Arthur et al., 2000; Bourdeau et al., 1999; Li et al., 1999). From analysis of the endoglin loss of function phenotype, it is unclear whether endoglin plays an essential cell autonomous role in SMC, or if impaired SMC development is secondary to a lack of endoglin expression in the endothelium. For the first time, data presented in this study demonstrate an intrinsic, cell autonomous role for endoglin in SMC precursors. Over expression of endoglin in neural crest cells resulted in pronounced hemorrhaging in cranial vessels and the pericardial cavity. Hemorrhaging and aberrant SMC’s in the wall of the vessels did not appear to be associated with cell death or proliferation as measured by TUNEL and phospho histone H3 staining, respectively. Hemorrhaging into the pericardial sac could have resulted from defects in the junction between the smooth muscle and the myocardium, arising from perturbation of the secondary heart field with altered patterning of the atrial pole (Waldo et al., 2005). Lineage tracing studies demonstrated that migration of endoglin over expressing NCSCs to vessel walls is comparable with wild type, arguing against a migration defect as the origin of the vascular phenotype. Furthermore, skewing of NCSC fates secondary to endoglin over expression is unlikely because we show that NCSCCD105+ and NCSCCD105- were both capable of producing neuronal and glial cells. This finding was corroborated in vivo because endoglin specifically affected neural crest-derived SMC; whereas other neural crest derivatives including craniofacial structures, branchial arches, and dorsal root ganglion (data not shown) were grossly normal. Importantly, hemorrhaging was not observed in the trunk vessels, where the contribution of NCSCs to SMC is absent. Hemorrhaging was ostensibly due to decreased vascular integrity secondary to disorganization of SMCs in the walls of major vessels, an area populated by Wnt1-expressing cells. In addition, SMC disorganization was accompanied by an apparent increase in the number of SMCs. Upregulation of α-SMA expression in endoglin-expressing NCSCs is consistent with data suggesting enhanced SMC differentiation. We cannot exclude the possibility of an increase in total α-SMA protein expression in the same number of SMC. However, over expression of endoglin using the SM22αcre driver had no effect on total protein levels of α-SMA. This observation suggests that the effect of endoglin expression on SMC differentiation is specific to stem cell populations and does not impact committed progenitors. An explanation for the disorganization and rounded morphology of SMCs secondary to endoglin over expression is alteration in the cell adhesive properties. Previously, we demonstrated: i) a role for endoglin in regulating cell adhesion through interactions with the focal adhesion protein, zyxin, and ii) subsequent modulation of the levels of p130Cas and Crk in sites of focal adhesion (Conley et al., 2004). Like endoglin, Ephrin B2 is highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells with lower levels of expression seen in vascular SMCs. Conditional inactivation of Ephrin B2 in SMCs results in impaired mural cell attachment surrounding the vessels due to an apparent lack of focal adhesions and altered Crk-p130Cas signaling (Foo et al., 2006). More recently, mice in which Notch signaling was specifically inactivated in derivatives of the neural crest exhibited aortic arch patterning defects, pulmonary artery stenosis, and ventricular septal defects (High et al., 2007). Immunohistochemical examination of mutant arteries revealed disruption of the smooth muscle architecture that is similar to that seen in Figure 3 Although TGFβ1 is implicated in SMC differentiation in vitro (Chen and Lechleider, 2004; Shah and Anderson, 1997), recent studies in vivo suggest TGFβ1 signaling in neural crest does not specify SMCs. Surprisingly, conditional inactivation of ALK5 and TβRII in the neural crest results in normal SMC differentiation (Choudhary et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2006). Thus in vivo, it appears that factors other than TGFβ1 specify SMC from neural crest. Interestingly, Wnt1cre conditional inactivation of the putative BMP receptor ALK2 results in impaired SMC differentiation (Kaartinen et al., 2004). We showed by anti-phospho Smad 2/3 and anti-phospho Smad 1/5/8 antibody immunostaining that endoglin over expression had no apparent effect on canonical TGFβ or BMP receptor signaling. Furthermore, a compound mutant in which the Smad4 transcription factor is inactivated simultaneously with endoglin over expression suggests that there is no epistatic relationship between these two genes, indicating that they operate in distinct pathways. In this regard, our data suggesting the lack of involvement of canonical signaling is consistent with recent studies indicating that α-SMA expression in response to TGFβ involves Smad-independent signaling (Chen et al., 2006). These results support our hypothesis that endoglin plays a Smad-independent role in SMC differentiation from NCSCs in vivo. Involvement of endoglin in non-canonical signaling was previously suggested based on the phenotypic comparison between the eng-/- and TAK1-/- mouse strains (Jadrich et al., 2006). TAK1 is a non-canonical Smad-independent effector of TGFβ signaling. Similar to the eng-/- mouse, SMC development was impaired with normal endothelial cell development (Jadrich et al., 2006), thereby raising the possibility that TAK1 may act downstream of endoglin. Accumulating evidence suggests that the precursors of HHT lesions may occur early in human development (Mei-Zahav et al., 2006; Morgan et al., 2002). Our data suggest that vascular smooth muscle precursor cells that are deficient in endoglin may contribute to the formation of lesions that can appear later in life. By elucidating the molecular mechanisms through which endoglin functions, we will better understand the process of SMC differentiation and homeostasis. These findings may provide further insight into the vascular disorder HHT, which is caused by haploinsufficiency of endoglin with resulting vascular fragility. Moreover, we propose that these insights may be applicable to other stem cell populations with SMC differentiation potential such as mesenchymal stem cells, which also express endoglin (Vogel et al., 2003; Zvaifler et al., 2000) and are involved in vasculogenesis (Gojo et al., 2003). Acknowledgments The authors thank Anne Harrington and the Mouse Transgenic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Core Facility for production of the transgenic mice, and Kathleen Carrier and the Histology Core Facility for expert preparation of embryo sections. We thank Dr. D. Anderson for anti-SOX-10 and anti-HNK-1 antibodies. This work was supported in part by NIH/NCRR grants P20 RR 18789 (JMV and LHO), and P20 RR 15555 (CPHV) from the COBRE program of the National Center for Research Resources, and R01-HL083151 from the NIH National Heart , Lung, and Blood Institute (CPHV). Abbreviations Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 8; 274(2):584-94.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1992 Sep 25; 267(27):19027-30.
[J Biol Chem. 1992]Dev Biol. 2000 Jan 1; 217(1):42-53.
[Dev Biol. 2000]J Clin Invest. 1999 Nov; 104(10):1343-51.
[J Clin Invest. 1999]Science. 1999 May 28; 284(5419):1534-7.
[Science. 1999]Dev Biol. 2006 Jan 15; 289(2):420-9.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Cell. 1996 May 3; 85(3):331-43.
[Cell. 1996]Trends Genet. 1997 Jul; 13(7):276-80.
[Trends Genet. 1997]Exp Cell Res. 1995 Jun; 218(2):405-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 1995]Cell. 2000 May 26; 101(5):499-510.
[Cell. 2000]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):57-71.
[Neuron. 2001]Dev Biol. 2000 Jan 1; 217(1):42-53.
[Dev Biol. 2000]Dev Biol. 1999 Aug 1; 212(1):191-203.
[Dev Biol. 1999]Science. 1988 Mar 11; 239(4845):1277-81.
[Science. 1988]Development. 2000 Apr; 127(8):1607-16.
[Development. 2000]Cell. 1986 Dec 26; 47(6):1079-90.
[Cell. 1986]Hypertension. 2002 Nov; 40(5):713-20.
[Hypertension. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 1; 281(35):25110-23.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Hypertension. 2002 Nov; 40(5):713-20.
[Hypertension. 2002]Cell. 2000 May 26; 101(5):499-510.
[Cell. 2000]Cell. 1999 Mar 5; 96(5):737-49.
[Cell. 1999]Neuron. 1994 Dec; 13(6):1359-72.
[Neuron. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 15; 90(18):8392-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Neuron. 1994 Dec; 13(6):1359-72.
[Neuron. 1994]Science. 1999 May 28; 284(5419):1534-7.
[Science. 1999]Development. 2000 Apr; 127(8):1607-16.
[Development. 2000]Dev Biol. 2000 Jan 1; 217(1):42-53.
[Dev Biol. 2000]Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003 Nov; 6(4):210-9.
[Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003]Cell. 1999 Mar 5; 96(5):737-49.
[Cell. 1999]Hypertension. 2002 Nov; 40(5):713-20.
[Hypertension. 2002]Eur J Cell Biol. 1999 Sep; 78(9):614-23.
[Eur J Cell Biol. 1999]Development. 2000 Apr; 127(8):1607-16.
[Development. 2000]Cell. 2006 Jan 13; 124(1):161-73.
[Cell. 2006]Circ Res. 2004 May 14; 94(9):1195-202.
[Circ Res. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 8; 274(2):584-94.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Cell. 2003 Jun 13; 113(6):685-700.
[Cell. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 2; 270(22):13460-9.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]Dev Biol. 2006 Jan 15; 289(2):420-9.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 14; 94(21):11369-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):57-71.
[Neuron. 2001]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):57-71.
[Neuron. 2001]Cell. 1999 Mar 5; 96(5):737-49.
[Cell. 1999]Circ Res. 2004 May 14; 94(9):1195-202.
[Circ Res. 2004]Exp Cell Res. 1997 Feb 1; 230(2):169-80.
[Exp Cell Res. 1997]Dev Biol. 2000 Jan 1; 217(1):42-53.
[Dev Biol. 2000]J Clin Invest. 1999 Nov; 104(10):1343-51.
[J Clin Invest. 1999]Science. 1999 May 28; 284(5419):1534-7.
[Science. 1999]Dev Biol. 2005 May 1; 281(1):78-90.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Cell. 2006 Jan 13; 124(1):161-73.
[Cell. 2006]J Clin Invest. 2007 Feb; 117(2):353-63.
[J Clin Invest. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jul 30; 279(31):32858-68.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Circ Res. 2004 May 14; 94(9):1195-202.
[Circ Res. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 14; 94(21):11369-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Dev Biol. 2006 Jan 15; 289(2):420-9.
[Dev Biol. 2006]BMC Dev Biol. 2006 Nov 1; 6():51.
[BMC Dev Biol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2006 Jan 20; 281(3):1765-70.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Development. 2006 Apr; 133(8):1529-41.
[Development. 2006]Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jun; 160(6):596-601.
[Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006]Pediatrics. 2002 Jan; 109(1):E12.
[Pediatrics. 2002]Haematologica. 2003 Feb; 88(2):126-33.
[Haematologica. 2003]Arthritis Res. 2000; 2(6):477-88.
[Arthritis Res. 2000]Exp Cell Res. 2003 Aug 1; 288(1):51-9.
[Exp Cell Res. 2003]Hypertension. 2002 Nov; 40(5):713-20.
[Hypertension. 2002]