![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Michigan State University Journal compilation © 2007 Federation of European Microbiological Societies Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from human and non-human sources using a single multiplex PCR 1Department of Large Animal Sciences and Epidemiology, and National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA 2Department of Large Animal Sciences and Epidemiology, and National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, MN, USA Section Editor: Stefan Schwarz Correspondence: Mahdi Saeed, Michigan State University, 165 Food Safety and Toxicology building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Tel.: +517 432 9517; fax: +517 432 0976; e-mail: saeedama/at/cvm.msu.edu Received April 4, 2007; Revised June 5, 2007; Accepted June 8, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Simplified multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) was developed using one-shot multiplex PCR for seven variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) markers with high diversity capacity. MLVA, phage typing, and PFGE methods were applied on 34 diverse Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from human and non-human sources. MLVA detected allelic variations that helped to classify the S. Enteritidis isolates into more evenly distributed subtypes than other methods. MLVA-based S. Enteritidis clonal groups were largely associated with sources of the isolates. Nei's diversity indices for polymorphism ranged from 0.25 to 0.70 for seven VNTR loci markers. Based on Simpson's and Shannon's diversity indices, MLVA had a higher discriminatory power than pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), phage typing, or multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Therefore, MLVA may be used along with PFGE to enhance the effectiveness of the molecular epidemiologic investigation of S. Enteritidis infections. Keywords: Salmonella Enteritidis, MLVA, VNTR, PFGE, molecular epidemiology Introduction Salmonella infections are estimated to cause 1.4 million cases and more than 500 deaths a year in the United States (Mead et al., 1999) and economic losses caused by salmonellosis are projected to be from $0.5 to $2.3 billion per year. Currently, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is the most common Salmonella serotype encountered in foodborne salmonellosis in Europe and is one of the most common Salmonella serotypes recovered from human infections in North America. Phage typing is the most common method used for subtyping of S. Enteritidis but is available only at a small number of laboratories. However, phage types may be unstable and several S. Enteritidis strains do not conform to any of the specific phage types in current use (Rankin & Platt, 1995). Furthermore, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which is currently the gold-standard technique for subtyping bacterial isolates associated with common foodborne infections, is laborious, requires precise standardization, and is also of limited effectiveness in subtyping S. Enteritidis isolates (Hudson et al., 2001; Liebana et al., 2001; Swaminathan et al., 2001; Lukinmaa et al., 2004; Hyytia-Trees et al., 2006). The changing epidemiology of S. Enteritidis infections requires typing methods of high discriminatory power, that are reproducible, stable, easy to interpret, and compare between laboratories. Recently, DNA sequence-based methods such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) have been commonly used in subtyping of bacteria with high conserved sequences, as genome sequence data are available at GenBank (Lukinmaa et al., 2004; Maiden, 2006). However, MLST is laborious and time-consuming and had limited ability to resolve genetic diversity between S. enterica serovars compared with PFGE (Fakhr et al., 2005; Torpdahl et al., 2005). Recently, multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) has been proposed as an alternative to PFGE for subtyping of a number of pathogenic bacteria, especially highly clonal groups of microorganisms including Francisella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis, Escherichia coli O157 : H7, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, and Coxiella burnetii (Keim et al., 2000; Farlow et al., 2001; Klevytska et al., 2001; Lindstedt et al., 2003b, 2004a, b; Overduin et al., 2004; Ramisse et al., 2004; Svraka et al., 2006). MLVA is based on the detection of short sequence repeats that vary in copy number (i.e. variable number of tandem repeats or VNTR) in the microbial genome at various regions. The VNTR are often highly polymorphic with variation in both the number of repeat units and by sequence heterogeneity among individual units (van Belkum, 1999). MLVA typing of S. Enteritidis has been described previously (Boxrud et al., 2007). The objectives of this report were to describe the optimization of this MLVA to enable performing a one-shot multiplex PCR for seven VNTR markers with high diversity and to compare its discriminatory power with PFGE and phage typing on a diverse group of S. Enteritidis isolates. Materials and methods Bacterial strains Thirty-four S. Enteritidis strains originally isolated from a variety of sources from 1978 to 2004 were used in this study (Table 1). The strains represent the major phage types identified in the United States and include a variety of PFGE profiles, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and distinct multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) types. The strains were selected to represent various host and tissue sources including humans, chickens, eggs, mice, cows, wild animals, and the environment (chicken farms). The S. Enteritidis strains were phage typed at the National Veterinary Service and CDC laboratories (Ward et al., 1987). These strains were also analyzed for attachment and invasiveness to Hep-2 tissue culture cells, antimicrobial resistance profiling using the NARMS panel of 12 antimicrobials in a ‘Sensititer’ system, and MLEE to screen the isolates for 18 housekeeping enzymes were performed as described earlier (Saeed et al., 2006). PFGE for the isolates was performed at the Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Laboratories following the PulseNet standardized protocol (Ribot et al., 2002).
DNA isolation Strains were cultured overnight at 37°C on tryptic soy agar plates. A generous loopful of each culture was suspended in 200 μL distilled water. For DNA extraction, cell suspensions were heated to 98°C on a heat block for 5 min and then immediately cooled on ice for 5 min. Cell suspensions were centrifuged (20 000 g, 5 min), and supernatants were used as the DNA template for PCR amplification. DNA quantification was measured with a NanoDrop© ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Rockland, DE), after which diluted samples (1 : 100–1 : 300 sterile DI water) were prepared and the remainder was frozen at −20°C in 30% glycerol for later use. VNTR loci and multiplex PCR Tandem repeat loci and their primers were based on the genome sequences of S. Enteritidis LK5, S. Enteritidis PT4, and S. Typhimurium LT2 strains as described previously (Boxrud et al., 2007). A primer set for SE7 locus was redesigned in this study to yield a PCR amplicon that can be analyzed with the Beckman 600-bp DNA size marker and that can be separated by capillary electrophoresis under the same condition from amplicons of the other loci. Seven VNTR loci selected for MLVA were amplified in a single multiplex PCR with seven primer sets (SE1, SE2, SE3, SE5, SE7, SE8, and SE9) using forward primers labeled with a WellRED dye (Sigma-Proligo, Boulder, CO) at the 5′ end and nonlabeled reverse primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) described in Table 2. A master mix was made for 20 μL reactions containing the following components: 10 μL of 2 × Qiagen multiplex PCR Master mix, 2 μL of MgCl2 (25 mM), 2 μL of 10 × primer mix (0.3–1.5 μM per each primer), 3 μL of the dilute DNA template (0.1–1.0 ng μL−1), and RNase-free water to a volume of 20 μL. Samples were loaded into a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems). PCR was performed with predenature of 95°C for 15 min, then 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 90 s, 72°C for 90 s followed by a final elongation of 60°C for 30 min.
Capillary electrophoresis The PCR products were purified using MultiScreen™ 96-well plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA) with hydrated Sephadex and loaded into a Beckman CEQ 8000 automated DNA sequencer (Beckman-Coulter) according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol. The fragment size for each locus was determined by combining 1.0 μL of PCR product, 38.5 μL sample loading solution, and 0.5 μL of CEQ 600-bp DNA size standard (Beckman-Coulter) to each sample well. The conditions for capillary separation of fragments for all loci included a capillary temperature of 35°C, denature temperature of 90°C, duration of 120 s, injection voltage of 2.0 kV, duration of 30 s, separation voltage of 7.5 kV, and separation duration of 50 min. DNA sequencing To verify the genetic basis of the results from MLVA, the copy number variations of tandem repeats for distinct alleles at all seven VNTR loci were analyzed by direct sequencing. After VNTR amplification using nonfluorescently labeled primers, the PCR products were purified using QIAquick PCR purification kits (QIAGen Inc., Valencia, CA). The forward and reverse strands of the purified PCR amplicons were sequenced using a Beckman CEQ 8000 DNA sequencer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and GenomeLab DTCS Quick Start kit (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol. After sequences were aligned to create contigs using SeqMan (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI), the numbers of tandem repeats were counted using a tandem repeats finder software (accessible at http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html) (Benson, 1999). The copy numbers were rounded to the nearest integer and entered into the MLVA profiles. Diversity and discriminatory power For the evaluation of the discriminatory capacity of the allelic variation at each VNTR marker, Nei's diversity index was calculated as 1–Σ (allele frequency)2. The probability that another S. Enteritidis isolate in the population has the same MLVA type was measured by multiplying the frequency of each allele for seven loci, which assumes that the alleles occur at random in genotypes. Simpson's diversity (1-D) and Shannon's diversity (H′) indices were calculated to evaluate the discriminatory power of subtyping methods as described previously (Boxrud et al., 2007). Cluster analysis After sequencing verification process, the allele scores based on the fragment size were converted into repeat numbers of the seven loci and entered into bionumerics software (Applied-Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium) as character data for cluster analysis. A dendrogram was generated using the categorical coefficient and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) of the bionumerics software (version 4.5). This categorical parameter implies that the same weight is given to any multistate character at each locus, whatever the repeat number is (Ramisse et al., 2004). A minimum-spanning tree (MST) was also generated using the categorical coefficient of the software to calculate the distance matrix. In case of equivalent solutions in terms of calculated distance, the highest number of single locus variants (SLVs; in case two types have an equal distance to a linkage position in the tree, the type that has the highest number of SLVs is linked first) associated was used as the priority rule for linking types in the tree. Creation of hypothetical types (missing links) was allowed to introduce hypothetical types as branches of the MST, causing the total spanning of the tree to decrease significantly. Results and discussion The MLVA method has been optimized for the typing of a diverse group of 34 S. Enteritidis isolates. Diversity of 34 S. Enteritidis isolates is demonstrated by 10 different phage types, several patterns of attachment and invasiveness, and antimicrobial resistance expressed by six isolates, including four isolates with multi-drug resistance (Table 1). MLEE type (ET) 3 was the most common among the 34 S. Enteritidis isolates. Ten PFGE patterns were identified using XbaI enzyme while 11 PFGE patterns were identified using BlnI enzyme. Combined patterns of the two enzymes resulted in 13 distinct PFGE genotypes. Tandem repeat sequences and diversity for VNTR loci are shown in Table 2. The genetic diversity estimates for seven loci ranged from 0.25 for SE9 to 0.70 for SE5. MLVA distinguished 13 different types among the 34 S. Enteritidis isolates from diverse sources (Fig. 1
The probability that another S. Enteritidis isolate with the same MLVA profile based on seven VNTR markers occurs in the population ranged from 0.038 to 0.00001 (Fig. 1a An MST analysis was conducted to develop a model for the evolutionary steps in the divergence of the S. Enteritidis MLVA genotypes (Fig. 1b MLVA has been reported to produce larger numbers of subtypes of E. coli O157 (Noller et al., 2003; Keys et al., 2005; Hyytia-Trees et al., 2006) and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (Lindstedt et al., 2003a) than does PFGE. A previous study on S. Enteritidis (Boxrud et al., 2007) demonstrated that MLVA yielded higher discriminatory power than did PFGE when tested using a panel of human clinical isolates of S. Enteritidis recently isolated from Minnesota. In the present study, the higher discriminatory power of MLVA for S. Enteritidis enabled the resolution of 18 S. Enteritidis isolates from diverse sources, but with identical PFGE patterns, into seven MLVA types. These S. Enteritidis MLVA types were largely clustered by source of isolation irrespective of their multiple phage types, which can serve as a useful epidemiologic tool in the investigation of S. Enteritidis infections (Fig. 2
Simpson's diversity index and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of subtyping methods were calculated in Table 3. Shannon's diversity index (H′) for MLVA was compared with other subtyping methods. Diversity indices of both Simpson and Shannon's were significantly higher in MLVA than other subtyping methods (Table 3). Although PFGE and MLVA grouped the 34 S. Enteritidis isolates into 13 types (Fig. 1a
Molecular subtyping methods that can be used to relate disease-causing pathogens to their probable sources are needed. PFGE has been the standardized method used in PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping network for the epidemiological investigation of several foodborne pathogens. However, a combination of PFGE and phage typing has been applied for the characterization of S. Enteritidis isolates from different sources (Liebana et al., 2001, 2002). PFGE subtyping of S. Enteritidis did not result in diverse profiles because the genomes of S. Enteritidis are highly similar (Hudson et al., 2001; Liebana et al., 2001). In this study, the previously described MLVA method for S. Enteritidis subtyping has been optimized, so that it may be performed as a single multiplex PCR followed by DNA fragment analysis. In epidemiologic investigations, the sensitivity and effectiveness of a laboratory method, along with other information, to identify the source of infectious agents, are vital if early control and preventive measures against the disease. If the host adaptation leaves a print of particular variation in even one locus of the VNTR, MLVA is more likely to help in tracing back the S. Enteritidis to its source than PFGE and phage tying. Because the identification of sources of foodborne pathogens is important for the control of foodborne diseases, the high discriminatory power of MLVA can be of significant value in the epidemiologic investigation of outbreak and sporadic cases of S. Enteritidis infection (Boxrud et al., 2007). Further study may be needed to compare allele distribution or genetic diversity for each locus of S. Enteritidis isolates from different sources for tracing purposes. Among the limitations of this study is the relatively small number of S. Enteritidis isolates; for example, the small numbers of samples used in an MST-based cluster may not be adequate to construct a valid population modeling. In conclusion, the MLVA method has been optimized based on a single multiplex PCR using seven VNTR markers with high diversity capacity. Tandem repeat numbers for each locus were verified after the sequencing step. This method can be used along with PFGE to enhance the effectiveness of the molecular epidemiologic investigation of S. Enteritidis infections. Acknowledgments This study was funded, in part, with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) National Institute of Health (NIH), US Department of Health and Human Services under contract N01-AI-30058. Dr Thomas Besser and the Washington State University ZRU team are thanked for providing part of the S. Enteritidis isolates for this project. Statement Reuse of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 Sep-Oct; 5(5):607-25.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 1999]Epidemiol Infect. 1995 Apr; 114(2):227-36.
[Epidemiol Infect. 1995]Avian Dis. 2001 Oct-Dec; 45(4):875-86.
[Avian Dis. 2001]J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan; 39(1):154-61.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2001]Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 May-Jun; 7(3):382-9.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 2001]APMIS. 2004 Nov-Dec; 112(11-12):908-29.
[APMIS. 2004]Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006 Spring; 3(1):118-31.
[Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006]J Bacteriol. 2000 May; 182(10):2928-36.
[J Bacteriol. 2000]J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Sep; 39(9):3186-92.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2001]J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Sep; 39(9):3179-85.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2001]Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2003 Dec 10; 2():12.
[Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2003]J Microbiol Methods. 2004 Nov; 59(2):163-72.
[J Microbiol Methods. 2004]J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 45(2):536-43.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2007]Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Oct; 99(2):291-4.
[Epidemiol Infect. 1987]J AOAC Int. 2006 Mar-Apr; 89(2):504-11.
[J AOAC Int. 2006]Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Apr; 8(4):387-91.
[Emerg Infect Dis. 2002]J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 45(2):536-43.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2007]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 15; 27(2):573-80.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 45(2):536-43.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2007]J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec; 42(12):5722-30.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2004]J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec; 41(12):5389-97.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2003]J Appl Microbiol. 2005; 98(4):928-40.
[J Appl Microbiol. 2005]Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006 Spring; 3(1):118-31.
[Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006]J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 41(4):1469-79.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2003]J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 45(2):536-43.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2007]J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan; 39(1):154-61.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2001]J Appl Microbiol. 2002; 92(2):196-209.
[J Appl Microbiol. 2002]Avian Dis. 2001 Oct-Dec; 45(4):875-86.
[Avian Dis. 2001]J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 45(2):536-43.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2007]