![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Nitrosamines as nicotinic receptor ligands Hildegard M. Schuller, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. Author for Proofs and correspondence: Hildegard M. Schuller, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, 2407 River Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. Phone: 865-974-8217, Fax: 865-974-3727, e-mail: hmsch/at/utk.edu Abstract Nitrosamines are carcinogens formed in the mammalian organism from amine precursors contained in food, beverages, cosmetics and drugs. The potent carcinogen, NNK, and the weaker carcinogen, NNN, are nitrosamines formed from nicotine. Metabolites of the nitrosamines react with DNA to form adducts responsible for genotoxic effects. We have identified NNK as a high affinity agonist for the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) whereas NNN bound with high affinity to epibatidine-sensitive nAChRs. Diethylnitrosamine (DEN) bound to both receptors but with lower affinity. High levels of the α7nAChR were expressed in human small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines and in hamster pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNECs), which serve as a model for the cell of origin of human SCLC. Exposure of SCLC or PNECs to NNK or nicotine increased expression of the a7nAChR and caused influx of Ca2+, activation of PKC, Raf-1, ERK1/2, and c-myc, resulting in the stimulation of cell proliferation. Signaling via the α7nAChR was enhanced when cells were maintained in an environment of 10–15% CO2 similar to that in the diseased lung. Hamsters with hyperoxia-induced pulmonary fibrosis developed neuroendocrine lung carcinomas similar to human SCLC when treated with NNK, DEN, or nicotine. The development of the NNK-induced tumors was prevented by green tea or theophylline. The beta-adrenergic receptor agonist, isoproterenol or theophylline blocked NNK-induced cell proliferation in vitro. NNK and nicotine-induced hyperactivity of the α7nAChR/RAF/ERK1/2 pathway thus appears to play a crucial role in the development of SCLC in smokers and could be targeted for cancer prevention. Keywords: Tobacco nitrosamines, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, small cell lung cancer, pulmonary neuroendocrine cell Introduction Nitrosamines are formed by the nitrosation of simple amine precursors in the mammalian organism. They are characterized by the presence of the N-nitroso group and may be aliphatic or ring structures (Figure 1
Nicotine, from which NNK and NNN are formed by nitrosation in the mammalian organism and during the processing of tobacco, is an agonist for the family of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which are expressed in the majority of mammalian cells. The affinity of nicotine to these receptors is greater than that of their physiological agonist, the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Accordingly, nicotine displaces acetylcholine from these receptors. The resulting hyper stimulation of nicotinic receptor pathways is responsible for the diverse biological effects of nicotine. The biology of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and the interaction of nicotine with these receptors have been extensively studied in the central nervous system as well as muscle tissues. It has thus been shown that nAChRs are comprised of a central ion channel with high permeability for Ca2+ enclosed by subunits termed alpha through delta. Neuronal nAChRs may contain α2 through α9and β2 through β4 subunits whereas the muscle nAChRs contain additionally gamma and delta subunits (Gotti, Fornasari and Clementi, 1997; Wessler, Kirkpatrick and Racke, 1998). In addition to the central nervous system and peripheral nerves of the vagus, nAChRs with subunit compositions of neuronal nAChRs have also been identified in a large number of non-neuronal cells in peripheral organs (Grando, Kawashima and Wessler, 2003). A potential role of nAChRs in smoking-associated lung carcinogenesis was first suggested by a publication from our laboratory in 1989, which showed that nicotine and NNK stimulated the proliferation of cell lines derived from human small cell lung cancer (SCLC) when the cells were maintained in an environment of 10% CO2 and that this response was blocked by the neuronal nAChR antagonist hexamethonium (Schuller, 1989). Two other laboratories subsequently reported nicotine-evoked stimulation of cell proliferation (Cattaneo, Codignola, Vicentini, Clementi and Sher, 1993) or inhibition of apoptosis (Maneckjee and Minna, 1990; Maneckjee and Minna, 1994) in human SCLC cell lines. The initial findings from these three laboratories suggested that nicotine itself may contribute to the development of smoking-associated SCLC and that the nicotine-derived nitrosamine NNK may interact with nicotinic receptor signaling. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the interaction of carcinogenic nitrosamines with nicotinic receptors and their implications for lung cancer as reported in the Second International Symposium on Non-Neuronal Acetylcholine (Mainz, Germany, 2006). Ligand Binding of nitrosamines to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors The tobacco-specific nitrosamines NNN and NNK are nitrosated nicotine derivatives. NNN closely resembles nicotine in structure whereas the formation of NNK from nicotine involves opening of the pyrrolidine ring (Figure 2
The high affinity of NNK to the α7nAChR and of NNN to epibatidine-sensitive nAChrs observed by us in human SCLC and PAC cell lines, respectively, was also reported in human oral keratinozytes and bronchial epithelial cells during this symposium by Dr. Grando (Arredondo, Chernyavsky, Jolkovsky, Pinkerton and Grando, 2006a). The concentration of nicotine in the maistream smoke of cigarettes is on average 5,000–10,000 times higher than that of NNK and about 2,000 to 3,000 times higher than that of NNN (Hecht and Hoffmann, 1988). The prevalence of nicotine over NNK in tobacco products is counteracted by the significantly higher affinity of NNK to the α7nAChR and the higher affinity of nicotine to epibatidine-sensitive receptors, which are considerably more numerous in mammalian organs, including the lungs. Upon simultaneous exposure to nicotine and NNK, the nitrosamine will therefore likely bind to α7nAChRs while nicotine binds to epibatidine-sensitive nAChRs. In addition, the extremely high affinity of NNN to epibatidine-sensitive nAChRs will lead to binding of this nitrosamine to this receptor family in smokers while nicotine will only bind to these receptors if binding sites are still available after NNN binding has saturated. In addition, available figures on relative exposure levels of NNN, NNK, and nicotine in smokers are based on the concentration of these agents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke while not including the amounts of nitrosamines formed endogenously from nicotine in the mammalian organism. These amounts can be substantial and can also show considerable inter-individual variations, pending on the presence of other factors that facilitate the endogenous nitrosation of nicotine, such as non-tobacco nitrosating agents. Collectively, these findings suggest that many of the biological effects that have been reported as the result of exposure to nicotine in smokers are in reality caused by interaction of nitrosamines with nAChRs. Nitrosamine-induced signaling via nAChRs and lung cancer Lung cancer is commonly classified into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SCLC is comprised of neuroendocrine cells that express neuroendocrine markers such as L-dopa decarboxylase, serotonin, mammalian bombesin, calcitonin, neuron-specific enolase, and others (Gazdar, Helman, Israel, Russell, Linnoila, Mulshine, Schuller and Park, 1988). SCLC frequently demonstrates amplification of c-myc and harbors mutations in the retinoblastoma and p53 genes, while not expressing point mutations in k-ras (Salgia and Skarin, 1998). Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNECs), which function as hypoxia-sensitive chemoreceptors in the lungs (Cutz and Jackson, 1999), share numerous phenotypic and functional features with SCLC cells and are the putative cell type of origin of this lung cancer. Any lung cancer that cannot be classified as SCLC is diagnosed as NSCLC, a heterogeneous family of cancers. The three major histological NSCLC types are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma, with adenocarcinoma predominating. Contrary to SCLC, these cancers do not express amplification in c-myc. By contrast, activating point mutations in k-ras are common as are inactivating mutations in p53 (Mitsudomi, Viallet, Mulshine, Linnoila, Minna and Gazdar, 1991; Salgia and Skarin, 1998). Squamous cell carcinomas are thought to arise from the pseudostratified epithelial lining comprised of basal cells, ciliated cells and mucous cells of large airways. By contrast, most adenocarcinomas are believed to originate from the simple epithelial lining comprised of Clara cells and ciliated cells of small airways while a small subset of these cancers may also arise from alveolar epithelial type II cells. Smoking is the single best-identified risk factor for all lung cancers. In addition, exposure to ionizing radiation and chloromethyl ethers, both of which cause pulmonary fibrosis, further enhance the risk of smokers to develop SCLC (Cook, Miller and Bunn, 1993; Devesa, Bray, Vizcaino and Parkin, 2005). Some of our early studies have shown that NNK, DEN and nicotine stimulate the proliferation of human lung cancer cells with neuroendocrine features, an effect blocked by the broad-spectrum antagonist for neuronal nAChRs, hexamethonium (Schuller, 1989). To further elucidate the cellular signaling involved, we used NNK-exposed SCLC cells and fetal hamster PNECs, with nicotine-exposed cells (1 μM) serving as positive controls. Using in vitro kinase Raf-1 activation assays and Western blotting, we found that a very low concentration of only 100 pM NNK caused significant activation of Raf-1 and phosphorylated the extracellular signal regulated kinases ERK1/2 in both cell systems (Jull, Plummer and Schuller, 2001). These effects were completely blocked by αBTX (20 nM), by the PKC inhibitor sphingosine (10 μM), or by the serotonin uptake inhibitor, imipramine (1 μM). The addition of serotonin (100 pM) to the cultured cells mimicked the effects of nicotine or NNK on Raf-1/ERK1/2 activation and cell proliferation (Schuller, Jull, Sheppard and Plummer, 2000), suggesting that the autocrine growth factor serotonin mediated some of these responses. In support of this interpretation, analysis by enzyme immunoassays assays of serotonin released into the culture medium detected significant release of this biogenic amine in cells treated with nicotine or NNK. Exposure of the cells to 10% CO2, as opposed to the standard environment of 5% CO2, used to culture these cells also caused serotonin release and enhanced their responsiveness to NNK or nicotine (Plummer, Sheppard and Schuller, 2000; Schuller, 1998). Cell proliferation analyzed by [3H]thymidine incorporation assays correlated with the observed signaling responses, with significant stimulation of DNA synthesis in SCLC cells and PNECs exposed to 100 pM NNK or 1 μM nicotine that was enhanced by 10% CO2 and completely inhibited by αBTX, imipramine, sphingosine or the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (Jull, Plummer and Schuller, 2001; Plummer, Sheppard and Schuller, 2000; Schuller, 1994; Schuller, 1998). In addition, NNK-induced proliferation of SCLC cells was significantly reduced by the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist, isoproterenol, presumably via cAMP-induced inhibition of Raf (Plummer, Dhar, Cekanova and Schuller, 2005). NNK also phosphorylated the transcription factor c-myc in a time-dependent manner (Jull, Plummer and Schuller, 2001). This finding has recently been extended by another laboratory that reported growth-promoting cooperation of Bcl2 and c-myc via phosphorylation at specific sites by NNK in SCLC cells (Jin, Gao, Flagg and Deng, 2004). In addition, these investigators showed that NNK induced ERK1/2-dependent phosphorylation of mu- and m- calpains as well as the secretion of these calpains, and that theses effects stimulated cell migration and invasion (Xu and Deng, 2004). However, in the absence of control experiments with serotonin uptake inhibitors, it is not clear if the observed phosphorylations of Bcl2, c-myc, or calpains were mediated via signaling of the α7nAChR or indirectly in response to nAChR-mediated serotonin release and re-uptake. Contrary to many other cell surface receptors, which are downregulated by chronic exposure to agonists, the α7nAChR is upregulated in smokers and after experimental exposure to nicotine (Peng, Gerzanich, Anand, Wang and Lindstrom, 1997). In analogy to these reports, NNK upregulated the expression of α7nAChR mRNA in hamster PNECs (Plummer, Sheppard and Schuller, 2000). These findings suggest that NNK significantly contributes to the “paradoxical upregulation” of the a7nAChr observed in smokers. Collectively, these findings suggest that NNK and nicotine-induce mitogenic signaling in SCLC and PNECs via PKC, Raf-1, and c-myc (Figure 4
Studies in monkeys (Sekhon, Jia, Raab, Kuryatov, Pankow, Whitsett, Lindstrom and Spindel, 1999) and in cell lines derived from a variety of normal lung cell types and from different histological types of lung cancer have identified nAChRs of many different subunit compositions, including the α7 subunit, in normal bronchial epithelial cells (Arredondo, Chernyavsky and Grando, 2006b). In addition, expression of the α7nAChR has been reported in small airway epithelial cells, in a lung squamous cell carcinoma and several but not all investigated PAC cell lines, and in a panel of diverse NSCLC tissue samples, including large cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, PAC and carcinoid (Plummer, Dhar and Schuller, 2005). Studies with bronchial epithelial cells BEP2D, which express a wide range of nAChR types, revealed that NNK and NNN both stimulated cell proliferation and malignant transformation, effects primarily mediated via α7nAChRs by NNK and via α3nAChRs by NNN (Arredondo, Chernyavsky and Grando, 2006). These studies also confirmed the earlier reported (Schuller and Orloff, 1998) very high affinities of NNK for the α7nAChR and of NNN to epibatidine-sensitive nAChRs in radio-ligand binding assays. Nicotine and NNK-induced attenuation of apoptosis via activation of the serine/threonine kinase, AKT (West, Brognard, Clark, Linnoila, Yang, Swain, Harris, Belinsky and Dennis, 2003) as well as activation of NFkappaB associated with upregulation of cyclin D1 (Ho, Chen, Wang, Pestell, Albanese, Chen, Chang, Jeng, Lin, Liang, Tseng, Lee, Lin, Chu, Chen, Lee, Tso, Lai and Wu, 2005) are additional α7nAChR-mediated signaling events that have been reported in immortalized human bronchial and small airway epithelial cells. Both of these cell types express the EGFR and its associated mitogenic and anti-apoptotic signaling pathways. It remains to be elucidated if the reported α7nAChR-mediated effects on NFkappaB, cyclin D1 and AKT include cross-talk with the EGFR, upregulation of the EGFR and/or the nAChR-mediated release and re-uptake of EGF. It has been shown that nicotine upregulates the EGFR in an EGF-dependent manner in cervical cancer cell lines while also uupregulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in these cells (Lane, Gray, Mathur and Mathur, 2005; Mathur, Mathur and Young, 2000). These findings are complemented by a recent report that nicotine-induced stimulation of the α7nAChR in endothelial cells causes the release of VEGF and transactivated the VEGF receptor (Heeschen, Weis, Aicher, Dimmeler and Cooke, 2002). Conclusions and future directions The data summarized in this review suggest an important role of nitrosamine-induced cellular signaling via the α7nAChR in the development of smoking-associated SCLC and possibly, other histological types of lung cancer. In accord with one of the physiological roles of this receptor as a regulator for the release of neurotransmitters, hormones and growth factors, much of the observed cellular signaling in response to NNK-induced α7nAChR stimulation in SCLC cells and their putative cells of origin, PNECs, appears to be caused by the release and re-uptake of serotonin. In NSCLCs and their putative cells of origin, large, and small airway epithelial cells, the reported signaling responses to NNK, nicotine, or NNN mediated by the α7nAChR and epibatidine-sensitive nAChRs may involve transactivation and upregulation of the EGFR, with or without the concomitant release and re-uptake of EGF, a hypothesis warranting future studies. The very high affinities of NNK to the α7nAChR and of NNN to epibatidine-sensitive nAChRs strongly suggest that these two nitrosamines play important roles in a host of biological effects that have to this date been attributed to nicotine. An important aspect of nAChR biology is the fact that the functions of these receptors are cell type-specific and that their expression levels and sensitivity can be modulated by a host of factors in the human environment. Exposure to nicotine or NNK by smoking or second-hand smoke upregulates the α7nAChR, as does a hypoxic environment. Both of these conditions are met in smokers who develop chronic non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases prior to the onset of lung cancer. Pending on their medical history, there will therefore be significant inter-individual variations in the levels of expression and sensitivity of this receptor in identical types of cells. Similar to other nicotinic receptor ligands, NNK also binds as a high affinity agonist to β-adrenoreceptors (β-ARs) and has been shown to stimulate the proliferation of small airway epithelial cells and the adenocarcinomas derived from them via PKA-dependent transactivation of the EGFR (Laag, Majidi, Cekanova, Masi, Takahashi and Schuller, 2006; Schuller, 2002). Again, the expression and sensitivity of these receptors are greatly influenced by exposure to agonists (downregulation) widely used for the treatment of asthma, antagonists (upregulation), widely used as anti-hypertensive agents as well as agents that increase intracellular cAMP, such as caffeine and theophylline (sensitization). Whether or not cellular responses to NNK are mediated by nAChR or β-AR signaling will thus vary considerably from one individual to the next. This heterogeneity of nicotinic and beta-adrenergic receptor expression and sensitivity is still maintained in cell lines derived from human patients, a fact often overlooked by the scientific community. In order to arrive at the design of effective lung cancer prevention and treatment strategies, diagnostic tools for the identification of hyperactive signaling pathways in the individual patient are urgently needed. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Crit Rev Toxicol. 1996; 26(2):163-81.
[Crit Rev Toxicol. 1996]Crit Rev Toxicol. 1996; 26(2):199-211.
[Crit Rev Toxicol. 1996]Prog Neurobiol. 1997 Oct; 53(2):199-237.
[Prog Neurobiol. 1997]Life Sci. 2003 Mar 28; 72(18-19):2009-12.
[Life Sci. 2003]Biochem Pharmacol. 1989 Oct 15; 38(20):3439-42.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1989]Cancer Res. 1993 Nov 15; 53(22):5566-8.
[Cancer Res. 1993]Cell Growth Differ. 1994 Oct; 5(10):1033-40.
[Cell Growth Differ. 1994]Cancer Res. 1993 Nov 15; 53(22):5566-8.
[Cancer Res. 1993]Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 May 1; 55(9):1377-84.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1998]Exp Lung Res. 2000 Mar; 26(2):121-35.
[Exp Lung Res. 2000]Int J Oncol. 2000 Mar; 16(3):513-8.
[Int J Oncol. 2000]J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct; 132(10):653-63.
[J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006]Carcinogenesis. 1988 Jun; 9(6):875-84.
[Carcinogenesis. 1988]Cancer Res. 1988 Jul 15; 48(14):4078-82.
[Cancer Res. 1988]J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar; 16(3):1207-17.
[J Clin Oncol. 1998]Oncogene. 1991 Aug; 6(8):1353-62.
[Oncogene. 1991]Curr Probl Cancer. 1993 Mar-Apr; 17(2):69-141.
[Curr Probl Cancer. 1993]Biochem Pharmacol. 1989 Oct 15; 38(20):3439-42.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1989]J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec; 127(12):707-17.
[J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001]Eur J Pharmacol. 2000 Mar 30; 393(1-3):265-77.
[Eur J Pharmacol. 2000]Exp Lung Res. 2000 Mar; 26(2):121-35.
[Exp Lung Res. 2000]Neurotoxicology. 1994 Winter; 15(4):877-86.
[Neurotoxicology. 1994]Mol Pharmacol. 1997 May; 51(5):776-84.
[Mol Pharmacol. 1997]Exp Lung Res. 2000 Mar; 26(2):121-35.
[Exp Lung Res. 2000]Cancer Res. 1993 Nov 15; 53(22):5566-8.
[Cancer Res. 1993]Nature. 1993 Sep 9; 365(6442):153-5.
[Nature. 1993]Chest. 1997 Sep; 112(3):779-84.
[Chest. 1997]Cancer Res. 1990 Mar 15; 50(6):1960-5.
[Cancer Res. 1990]J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Mar; 58(3):673-80.
[J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977]Cancer Biol Ther. 2006 May; 5(5):511-7.
[Cancer Biol Ther. 2006]Respir Res. 2005 Apr 4; 6():29.
[Respir Res. 2005]J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct; 132(10):653-63.
[J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006]Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 May 1; 55(9):1377-84.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1998]Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Jun 1; 205(2):133-48.
[Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005]