![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Contributions of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)/PTH-Related Peptide Receptor Signaling Pathways to the Anabolic Effect of PTH on Bone 1 Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 2 Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA Harvard Medical School * Correspondence and reprint requests to: F R Bringhurst, M.D., Endocrine Unit, Thier 11, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, Phone: (617)726-3966, Fax: (617)726-7543, Email: rbringhurst/at/partners.org Abstract PTH regulates osteoblastic function by activating PTH/PTHrP receptors (PTH1Rs), which trigger several signaling pathways in parallel, including cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) and, via both phospholipase-C (PLC)-dependent and PLC-independent mechanisms, protein kinase C (PKC). These signaling functions have been mapped to distinct domains within PTH(1–34), but their roles in mediating the anabolic effect of intermittent PTH in vivo are unclear. We compared the anabolic effects in mice of hPTH(1–34) with those of two analogs having restricted patterns of PTH1R signaling. [G1,R19]hPTH(1–28) lacks the 29–34 domain of hPTH(1–34) needed for PLC-independent PKC activation, incorporates a Gly1 mutation that prevents PLC activation, and stimulates only cAMP/PKA signaling. [G1,R19]hPTH(1–34) retains the 29–34 domain and activates both cAMP/PKA and PLC-independent PKC. Human PTH(1–34) (40 μg/kg), [G1,R19]hPTH(1–34) (120 μg/kg), and [G1,R19]hPTH(1–28) (800 μg/kg), at doses equipotent in elevating blood cAMP at 10 min and cAMP-dependent gene expression in bone at 6 h after s.c. injection, were administered to 10 week old female C57BL/6J mice 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Acute blood cAMP responses, retested after 4 weeks, were not reduced by the preceding PTH treatment. The three PTH peptides induced equivalent increases in distal femoral bone mineral density (BMD), and, by microCT analysis, distal femoral and vertebral bone volume and trabecular thickness and mid-femoral cortical endosteal apposition. [G1,R19]hPTH(1–34) and hPTH(1–34) increased distal femoral BMD more rapidly and augmented total-body BMD and bone volume of proximal tibial trabeculi to a greater extent than did [G1,R19]hPTH(1–28),. We conclude that cAMP/PKA signaling is the dominant mechanism for the anabolic actions of PTH in trabecular bone and PLC-independent PKC signaling, attributable to the PTH(29–34) sequence, appears to accelerate the trabecular response and augment BMD at some skeletal sites. PTH1R PLC signaling pathway is not required for an anabolic effect of intermittent PTH(1–34) on bone. Keywords: bone formation, PTH/PTHrP Receptor, blood cAMP, Bone densitometry, Bone QCT INTRODUCTION The classical actions of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are mediated by the PTH/PTH related peptide receptor, or type I PTHR (PTH1R), a member of the B subfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Experimental studies in animals and humans have demonstrated that intermittent administration of low doses of PTH by daily subcutaneous injection effectively stimulates cancellous bone formation, whereas continuous high-dose application of the hormone, as occurs during severe hyperparathyroidism, increases bone turnover and net bone resorption, thereby reducing bone mass [6, 7, 15, 17, 18, 20, 28]. The amino-terminal 34 amino acids of PTH have been shown to exert functions identical to the intact hormone [20, 28] to fully activate PTH1R signaling. Activation of the PTH1R initiates several parallel signaling pathways, which include the Gsα-protein dependent cyclic AMP/PKA pathway, both PLC-dependent and PLC-independent PKC pathways [31] and an increase in intracellular Ca++. The relationship between these signaling pathways and the anabolic and catabolic effects of PTH is of intense interest because complete understanding of the relation of specific PTH signaling to changes in bone cell function might enable the design of improved pharmacological agents for the treatment of bone diseases such as osteoporosis. Within the PTH(1–34) amino acid sequence, several key ligand domains have been linked to activation of specific PTH1R signaling responses. Thus, the first two amino-terminal residues of hPTH(1–34) (Ser1-Val2) are known to be required for activation of adenylyl cylcase, and use of amino-truncated analogs such as PTH(2–34), PTH(3–38) or desamino-hPTH(1–34) (N-propionyl (2–3)hPTH-amide) in vivo has failed to elicit a full anabolic response, leading to the conclusion that cAMP is responsible for mediating the anabolic response to PTH [11, 22]. Further, carboxyl-terminal truncation, to remove the sequence His32-Asn33-Phe34 (i.e., hPTH(1–31)), precludes activation of membrane-associated PKC(s) but does not impair stimulation of adenylyl cyclase or eliminate the anabolic response in vivo, which has further supported the role of cAMP in the anabolic response [13, 22, 26, 27]. Other evidence suggests that PTH1R-dependent adenylyl cyclase activation alone may not be sufficient to elicit a full anabolic response, however [18, 19], and interpretation of the studies with amino-truncated analogs was clouded by the lack of recognition that the PLC/PKC response to PTH is critically dependent upon the presence of the α-amino group of the amino-terminal Ser1 of hPTH(1–34) – i.e., inactive amino-truncated fragments actually lack both adenylyl cyclase and PLC/PKC responses [26]. Thus, the question of the relative roles of the cAMP vs. PKC-activating PTH1R signaling pathways in mediating the anabolic action of the hormone in vivo remains unsettled. Previous work from our group has demonstrated that substitution of glycine for the native serine at position 1 of hPTH(1–34) dramatically impairs PLC activation without eliminating cAMP generation and, as well, allows for retention of PLC-independent PKC activation as long as the 29–34 domain is present [27, 31]. In the present experiments, we employed two signaling-selective peptides, [Gly1, Arg19]hPTH(1–28) and [Gly1,Arg19]hPTH(1–34), together with PTH(1–34), to investigate, in vivo, the anabolic effects of different signaling pathways generated by PTH and to test the hypothesis that PTH1R-generated PKC signaling, arising via either PLC-dependent or PLC-independent mechanisms, contributes to the anabolic response of bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS Peptides Human PTH(1–34), [Gly1,Arg19]hPTH(1–28) (“G1R19 (1–28)”) and [Gly1,Arg19]hPTH(1–34) (“G1R19 (1–34)”) were synthesized in the Biopolymer Core Laboratory of the Endocrine Unit. All peptides were dissolved in 0.1% TFA, aliquotted, stored frozen at –80°C and subsequently diluted to the appropriate concentrations in vehicle (2% heat-inactivated mouse serum, 0.1N HCl and 0.9% sodium chloride) immediately before injection. PTH peptide concentrations were determined after hydrolysis by amino acid analysis, and purity was confirmed by analytical mass spectroscopy to be greater than 95%. Animals Virgin female C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and stabilized in the MGH animal research facility for 2 weeks before starting the experiments (at age 10 weeks). Mice were housed five per cage, given free access to water, and fed with a standard diet in a room maintained at 22 °C with 60–75% humidity on a 12 h light/dark cycle. Animals were maintained in facilities operated by the Center for Comparative Medicine of the Massachusetts General Hospital in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and protocols were approved by the Institution’s Subcommittee on Research Animal Care. Blood cAMP generation Ten week old female virgin mice were anesthetized with 1.2% avertin (100% avertin was made by dissolving 1 g of 2,2,2-tribromoethanol into 0.63 ml of 2-methyl-2-butanol) at the concentration of 25 μg/g body weight. PTH(1–34), G1R19(1–28) or G1R19 (1–34) was injected subcutaneously (sc) into the interscapular area, and 5, 10 or 30 min later blood was isolated by transection of the carotid artery. Mice were sacrificed by cervical vertebral dislocation shortly after blood collection. Blood samples were anti-coagulated with 7.5 mM EDTA and held at 4 °C pending separation of plasma by centrifugation at 4 °C and subsequent measurement of plasma cAMP by radioimmunoassay (RIA) using a commercial cAMP assay kit (New England Nuclear Corp., Boston, MA). Experimental protocol Mice were randomly subdivided into four groups of 10 mice each and baseline measurements of body weight and bone mineral density (BMD - see below) were performed. PTH peptides (40μg/kg PTH(1–34), 800μg/kg G1R19(1–28), 120μg/kg G1R19 (1–34)) or the same volume of vehicle (50 μl) alone were administered sc 5 days per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Body weight was measured every two weeks and BMD measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (total body, total femur and central femoral metaphysis) were performed at baseline, and at the second and fourth weeks after initiating PTH treatment. Prior to sacrifice, mice in each group were subdivided into two subgroups (5 mice each) for measurement of the acute blood cAMP response to PTH challenge. For this purpose, mice in one subgroup were injected with vehicle alone while their counterparts were administered the same PTH peptide (and dose thereof) that they had received throughout the preceding 4 weeks (except that the “re-treatment” subgroup of previous control mice received PTH(1–34) at 40 μg/kg). Plasma isolation and cAMP measurement were performed as described above. Upon sacrifice, femoral and lumbar vertebral bones were separated, cleaned of soft tissue, fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin (pH 7.2) for 48 h and then stored in 70% ethanol until further use. BMD measurement Mouse BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry using a Lunar PIXImus II densitometer (GE Medical System Luna, Madison, WI) following instructions provided by the manufacturer. In brief, mice were anesthetized and placed on a measuring tray with all four limbs extended but within the field of the detector. Outcome assessments included total body (skull excluded) and total femur BMD (g/cm2) [1, 5]. After sacrifice, DXA measurements of the excised right femurs were used to determine bone mineral content (BMC, g) and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) of the isolated bones. μCT analysis Quantitative microcomputed tomography (μCT40, Scanco Medical AG, Basserdorf, Switzerland) was used ex vivo to assess three-dimensional (3D) trabecular bone morphology in the 5th lumbar vertebrae and distal femoral metaphysis and cortical bone geometry at the mid-femoral diaphysis using an 12 μm isotropic voxel size [2, 3]. Morphometric variables were computed from the binarized images using direct, three-dimensional techniques that do not rely on any prior assumptions about the underlying structure [8–10]. For trabecular bone regions, we assessed the bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, μm), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm−1), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, μm). For cortical bone at the femoral midshaft, we measured the average total cross-sectional area inside the periosteal envelope (TA, mm2), the cortical bone area and medullary area within this same envelope (BA, mm2 and MA, mm2, respectively), and the average cortical thickness (CortTh, μm). Measurement of mRNA regulation by real-time RT-PCR Six week old female C57BL/6J mice were injected with PTH(1–34), G1R19(1–28) or G1R19(1–34) as described above. Six hours later, animals were sacrificed, femurs were dissected and RNAs were rapidly isolated from bone using an Rneasy kit (Qiagen, MD). Briefly, bone tissue was extracted into 1 ml of lysis buffer using a motorized homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, NY) for 20 sec. Femoral bone marrow was homogenized in lysis buffer by repeated passage through a 20-gauge syringe needle. Insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation (microcentrifuge, 1000 rpm), and total RNA in the supernatant then was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression levels of mRNAs for RAMP3 and Nr4a2, two genes found in preliminary in vitro experiments to be strongly regulated in osteoblasts by PTH and forskolin but not by phorbol ester, were measured by two-step real-time RT-PCR. Briefly, the first strand of cDNA was synthesized using a SuperScript First-Strand kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carisbad, CA). For each gene, specific PCR primer pairs (RAMP3/fw, 5′-tgcaccttcttccactgttg -3′; RAMP3/re, 5′-aggttgcaccacttccagac -3′. Nr4a2/fw, 5′-cggtttcagaagtgcctagc -3′; Nr4a2/re, 5′-ttgcctggaacctggaatag -3′; GAPDH/fw, 5′-tgtcgtggagtctactggtg-3′; GAPDH/re, 5′-gcattgctgacaatcttgag-3′) were designed and synthesized by Sigma-Genosys (Woodlands, TX). The PCR reactions (94 C, 20 sec; 60 C, 20 sec; 72 C, 20 sec) were performed on an Opticon instrument (OPTICON® 2,CFD-3220; MJ Research, Inc., Waltham, MA) using a QuantiTectTM SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Gene expression was normalized to that of GAPDH measured in the same sample, and then expressed as a fold increase over control. Tibial trabecular bone histomorphometry Excised left tibiae were dehydrated in graded acetone and embedded in methylmethacrylate. Four-μm-thick sagittal sections of the central regions of the tibiae were cut with a Shandon microtome (Waltham, MA) and calcified bone tissue was demonstrated by von Kossa staining. Bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular bone number (TbN) and trabecular bone thickness (TbTh) were measured on the trabecular area of proximal tibia in a region between 0.5 and and 2.5 fields (@200X) distal to the growth plate using a digitizing image analysis system and a morphometric program, OsteoMeasure (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Atlanta, GA), at a magnification of 200X. All parameters were calculated and expressed according to standard formulae and nomenclature. Statistical analysis All data analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA). The significance of differences in BMDs, and quantitive μCT between time/treatment groups was determined based on analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant differences were indicated, group means were compared using Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test. RESULTS Relative in vivo biopotency of PTH(1–34), G1R19(1–28) and G1R19(1–34) Previous in vitro studies from our group have demonstrated, by comparison with hPTH(1–34), that neither G1R19(1–28) nor G1R19(1–34) can activate PLC, that G1R19(1–34) (but not G1R19(1–28)) can activate PLC-independent/PKC signaling, and that both peptides retain the ability to elicit cAMP/PKA signaling via activation of rodent PTH1Rs [31]. The goal of the present studies was to assess the potential involvement of PTH1R-generated PKC signaling, arising via either a PLC-dependent or PLC-independent mechanism, in the anabolic effects of PTH in vivo. We first determined the doses of these two analogs required to induce a cAMP response in vivo equivalent to that of PTH(1–34) by measuring the initial blood cAMP response to injected peptides as a function of time and dose. As shown in Figure 1A
To determine if these acute cAMP responses were sustained throughout 4 weeks of intermittent PTH peptide administration, we retested the plasma cAMP responses to each of these PTH peptides at the conclusion of the bone-anabolic protocol, 24 h after the preceding sc dose of PTH peptide (or vehicle - see Methods). As shown in Figure 1E To examine a more delayed cAMP-dependent PTH response in vivo, we measured the expression in femoral bones at 6 h after PTH peptide injection of mRNAs encoding Receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 3 and nuclear receptor 4a2 (Nr4a2), two genes we found to be upregulated by PTH and forskolin, but not by phorbol ester, in isolated osteoblasts in vitro. As shown in Figure 1F Effects of PTH(1–34), G1R19(1–28) and G1R19(1–34) on BMD To assess the anabolic effect on bone of PTH(1–34) and the two analogs, G1R19 (1–34) and G1R19 (1–28), we measured total body BMD in normal female mice after 2 and 4 weeks of intermittent treatment with these peptides at doses (40, 120 and 800 μg/kg, respectively) that produced equivalent plasma cAMP responses in vivo. The results are depicted in Figure 2A
Total femur BMD, which includes cortical bone in the mid-shaft and trabecular bone in both distal and proximal metaphyses, was measured in vivo (baseline, 2 and 4 weeks) as well as ex vivo (4 weeks) (Figure 2B Compared to total femoral BMD, the responses to PTH at the distal femur were larger and occurred earlier (significant at 2 weeks) (Figure 2C Effects of PTH(1–34), G1R19(1–28) and G1R19(1–34) on microstructure of vertebral and femoral bone MicroCT analysis of bone microstructure performed on trabecular bone at the 5th lumbar vertebrae from PTH(1–34)-treated mice showed expected increases, relative to vehicle-treated controls, in BV/TV (17.1%), trabecular thickness (TbTh) (6.0%) and connectivity density (ConnD) (41.7%) (Table 1). Treatment with the G1R19(1–34) or G1R19(1–28) analog also increased BV/TV (17.5% and 12.3%, respectively), TbTh (4.0% and 3.9%) and ConnD (44.9% and 27.6%). The effect of G1R19(1–34) on vertebral ConnD was greater than that of G1R19(1–28), although this difference was not seen in distal femur (see below).
Analysis of distal femurs by μCT showed even greater effects of hPTH(1–34) treatment, with increases vs. controls in BV/TV, TbTh and ConnD of 36.0%, 12.4% and 63.3%, respectively (Table 1). These effects again were mimicked by the G1R19(1–34) and G1R19(1–28) analogs, and the effect of the G1R19(1–34) analog on BV/TV and ConnD at this site was particularly prominent in comparison to either hPTH(1–34) or G1R19(1–28) (Table 1). Examination by μCT of cortical architecture at the mid-femur showed that intermittent treatment with hPTH(1–34) increased bone area (8.0%) without altering total cross-sectional area (i.e. increased % bone area/total area) and also increased cortical thickness (8.1%) (Table 2). Similar changes in cortical bone occurred following treatment with the G1R19(1–34) and G1R19(1–28) analogs.
Effects of PTH(1–34), G1R19(1–28) and G1R19(1–34) on microstructure of proximal tibial trabecular bone Bone microstructure of proximal tibia at 4 weeks was analyzed by von Kossa staining and histomorphometric quantification. As shown in Figure 3
DISCUSSION In this study, we administered signal-selective analogs of PTH(1–34) to 10 week old female C57BL/6J mice to investigate the involvement of specific PTH1R signaling pathways in the anabolic effect of PTH on bone. Via PTH1Rs, PTH(1–34) activates Gαs/cAMP/PKA and Gαq/PLC/PKC pathways but also can activate PKC via a PLC-independent mechanism that requires the presence of the PTH(29–34) sequence. Early work with PTH analogs in vivo had led to the conclusion that cAMP-dependent pathways are uniquely important in the anabolic action of PTH(1–34). This concept was supported by findings that cAMP-defective analogs such as PTH(2–34) or PTH(3–38) were inactive in vivo whereas C-truncated analogs lacking PKC activity, such as PTH(1–31), retained the anabolic action [11, 22]. At the time, however, it was not yet appreciated that an intact PTH N-terminus is required for PLC-dependent PKC activation and that PTH1Rs can increase PKC activity via multiple mechanisms, triggered by either the N- or C-terminal regions of the ligand [25, 26, 29, 31]. In this regard, PKC signaling via PTH1Rs has been related to induction of osteoblastic bone formation [16, 24], especially PKC stimulated by the PTH(29–34) portion of the ligand [14, 21]. G1,R19(1–28) lacks the 29–34 domain of hPTH(1–34) required for PLC-independent PKC activation and incorporates a Ser1 to Gly1 mutation that blocks PLC activation (the Arg19 change improves binding affinity that otherwise is compromised by the C-terminal truncation) [27]. This peptide can no longer activate PKC via either PLC-dependent or PLC–independent mechanisms but can fully activate cAMP production via PTH1Rs, albeit with somewhat reduced potency [26, 31]. The related G1,R19(1–34) analog, which retains the 29–34 domain, was shown to activate both cAMP/PKA and (PLC-independent) PKC but is incapable of PLC activation [31]. The strategy used in the current study was to administer each of these analogs to mice, in an intermittent-treatment protocol, at doses that would activate cAMP/PKA signaling in vivo to the same extent as standard PTH(1–34) (40 μg/kg/d) and then to seek differences in skeletal responses that could be attributable to loss of one or both of the PKC-activation mechanisms normally available to the PTH1R in bone cells. Bioequivalent doses of the two analogs were selected on the basis of comparable stimulation of plasma cAMP levels 10 min after sc peptide administration and of cAMP-dependent mRNA upregulation in long bones at a later time (6 h). Further, the acute cAMP responses to PTH(1–34) and each of the two G1,R19-substituted analogs at the conclusion of the 4-week anabolic protocol were found to have remained comparable and, in contrast to the loss of cAMP responsiveness in isolated osteoblasts induced by continuous PTH exposure in vitro [12, 23], were not desensitized relative to the response seen in control animals not previously exposed to exogenous PTH. We have strived to carefully establish in vivo bioequivalent doses for the three PTH peptides used, with respect to the cAMP response that they share in common. The various approaches used are inherently limited, however, and we cannot exclude with certainty the possibility that these analogs may somehow elicit qualitatively different responses with respect to cAMP generation or action or that the effectivenss for activation of PLC-independent PKC by G1,R19(1–34) in vivo may differ from that of a cAMP-equivalent dose of hPTH(1–34). The effects of these PLC-deficient PTH analogs on bone were evaluated by total body, total femur and distal femur BMD measurements in vivo, by terminal μCT microstructural analysis of vertebrae, distal femur and femoral midshaft and by histomorphometric quantification of proximal tibial trabeculi. The actions of all three PTH peptides tested were comparable on most standard measures of the response of trabecular bone – i.e. distal femoral BMD, %BV/TV (distal femur, vertebrae) and TbTh (distal femur, proximal tibia and vertebrae). Some differences in microarchitecture (ConnD), in favor of inducing a more plate-like structure, were observed with G1,R19(1–34) versus the other two peptides (Table 1), but these were not consistent between vertebra and femur and thus are of uncertain significance. These results suggest that the cAMP/PKA response to the PTH1R activation is the major determinant of the anabolic response of trabecular bone, a conclusion concordant with observations of others [1, 11, 18, 22, 30] [4]. μCT analysis of cortical bone at the mid-femoral shaft showed that PTH decreased medullary area and increased bone area, cortical thickness and the ratio of bone to total area without altering total cross-sectional area – changes consistent with a predominant endosteal apposition of new bone and consistent with other reports of intermittent PTH action in cortical bone of female mice [3]. These structural changes in cortical bone were induced equivalently by PTH(1–34) and the two G1,R19-substituted analogs, again consistent with a dominant role of the cAMP/PKA PTH1R signaling pathway. Several observations did point to the possibility of unique in vivo effects of PKA-independent signaling on bone, however. Thus, compared with G1,R19(1–28), both PTH(1–34) and G1,R19(1–34) increased total body BMD to a greater extent (Figure 2A Collectively, these findings provide evidence that the cAMP/PKA response to PTH1R activation is the dominant mechanism that drives the anabolic response. However, the PLC-independent PKC pathway, stimulated by PTH peptides that incorporate the (29–34) sequence, appears to accelerate the pace of net bone accretion in trabecular bone, increase the extent of the response at sites captured by measurements of total body BMD and augment the size and number of trabeculae subjacent to the growth plate in weight-bearing bones like the tibia. Our data argue against an important role for PLC-dependent PTH1R signaling in the anabolic effects on bone of intermittent exogenous PTH administration. Further study of the possible mechanism of PLC-independent PKC signaling in skeletal responses to PTH is warranted. Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Institutes of Health awards DK11794, DK02889, DK65032 and S10-RR17868. We thank Dr. Henry Kronenberg for critical review of the manuscript. Vaida Glatt, Clare Colleen Thomas and Janet Saxton provided valuable technical assistance. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References 1. Bouxsein ML, Fajardo RJ. Cortical stability of the femoral neck and hip fracture risk. Lancet. 2005;366:1523–4. [PubMed] 2. Bouxsein ML, Palermo L, Yeung C, Black DM. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and vertebral fracture risk in elderly women: a prospective analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:358–65. [PubMed] 3. Bouxsein ML, Pierroz DD, Glatt V, Goddard DS, Cavat F, Rizzoli R, Ferrari SL. beta-Arrestin2 regulates the differential response of cortical and trabecular bone to intermittent PTH in female mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:635–43. [PubMed] 4. Calvi LM, Sims NA, Hunzelman JL, Knight MC, Giovannetti A, Saxton JM, Kronenberg HM, Baron R, Schipani E. Activated parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor in osteoblastic cells differentially affects cortical and trabecular bone. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:277–86. [PubMed] 5. Ferrari SL, Pierroz DD, Glatt V, Goddard DS, Bianchi EN, Lin FT, Manen D, Bouxsein ML. Bone response to intermittent parathyroid hormone is altered in mice null for {beta}-Arrestin2. Endocrinology. 2005;146:1854–62. [PubMed] 6. Finkelstein JS, Arnold AL. Increases in bone mineral density after discontinuation of daily human parathyroid hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog administration in women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1214–9. [PubMed] 7. Finkelstein JS, Klibanski A, Arnold AL, Toth TL, Hornstein MD, Neer RM. Prevention of estrogen deficiency-related bone loss with human parathyroid hormone-(1-34): a randomized controlled trial. J Amer Med Assoc. 1998;280:1067–73. 8. Hildebrand TLA, Muller R, Dequeker J, Ruegsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1167–1174. [PubMed] 9. Hildebrand TRP. new method for the model independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Micros. 1997;185:67–75. 10. Hildebrand TRP. Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 1997;1:5–23. 11. Hilliker S, Wergedal JE, Gruber HE, Bettica P, Baylink DJ. Truncation of the amino terminus of PTH alters its anabolic activity on bone in vivo. Bone. 1996;19:469–77. [PubMed] 12. Jongen JW, Willemstein-van Hove EC, van der Meer JM, Bos MP, Juppner H, Segre GV, Abou-Samra AB, Feyen JH, Herrmann-Erlee MP. Down-regulation of the receptor for parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related peptide by PTH in primary fetal rat osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1218–25. [PubMed] 13. Jouishomme H, Whitfield JF, Gagnon L, Maclean S, Isaacs R, Chakravarthy B, Durkin J, Neugebauer W, Willick G, Rixon RH. Further definition of the protein kinase C activation domain of the parathyroid hormone. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:943–9. [PubMed] 14. Kim TY, Vargas V, Mayer H, Somjen D, Kaye AM. Selective anabolic effects of muteins of mid-region PTH fragments on skeletal tissues of prepubertal rats. Bone. 2002;30:78–84. [PubMed] 15. Meng XW, Liang XG, Birchman R, Wu DD, Dempster DW, Lindsay R, Shen V. Temporal expression of the anabolic action of PTH in cancellous bone of ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:421–9. [PubMed] 16. Miao D, Tong XK, Chan GK, Panda D, McPherson PS, Goltzman D. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide stimulates osteogenic cell proliferation through protein kinase C activation of the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:32204–13. [PubMed] 17. Mitlak BH, Williams DC, Bryant HU, Paul DC, Neer RM. Intermittent administration of bovine PTH-(1–34) increases serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations and spinal bone density in senile (23 month) rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:479–84. [PubMed] 18. Mohan S, Kutilek S, Zhang C, Shen HG, Kodama Y, Srivastava AK, Wergedal JE, Beamer WG, Baylink DJ. Comparison of bone formation responses to parathyroid hormone(1–34), (1–31), and (2–34) in mice. Bone. 2000;27:471–8. [PubMed] 19. Murrills RJ, Matteo JJ, Samuel RL, Andrews JL, Bhat BM, Coleburn VE, Kharode YP, Bex FJ. In vitro and in vivo activities of C-terminally truncated PTH peptides reveal a disconnect between cAMP signaling and functional activity. Bone. 2004;35:1263–72. [PubMed] 20. Reeve J, Meunier PJ, Parsons JA, Bernat M, Bijvoet OL, Courpron P, Edouard C, Klenerman L, Neer RM, Renier JC, Slovik D, Vismans FJ, Potts JT., Jr Anabolic effect of human parathyroid hormone fragment on trabecular bone in involutional osteoporosis: a multicentre trial. Br Med J. 1980;280:1340–4. [PubMed] 21. Rihani-Bisharat S, Maor G, Lewinson D. In vivo anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) 28–48 and N-terminal fragments of PTH and PTH-related protein on neonatal mouse bones. Endocrinology. 1998;139:974–81. [PubMed] 22. Rixon RH, Whitfield JF, Gagnon L, Isaacs RJ, Maclean S, Chakravarthy B, Durkin JP, Neugebauer W, Ross V, Sung W, Willick GE. Parathyroid hormone fragments may stimulate bone growth in ovariectomized rats by activating adenylyl cyclase. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1179–89. [PubMed] 23. Sugimoto T, Ikeda K, Kano J, Yamaguchi T, Fukase M, Chihara K. Cross-talk of parathyroid hormone-responsive dual signal transduction systems in osteoblastic osteosarcoma cells: its role in PTH-induced homologous desensitization of intracellular calcium response. J Cell Physiol. 1994;158:374–80. [PubMed] 24. Swarthout JT, Doggett TA, Lemker JL, Partridge NC. Stimulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases and proliferation in rat osteoblastic cells by parathyroid hormone is protein kinase C-dependent. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:7586–92. [PubMed] 25. Takasu H, Bringhurst FR. Type-1 parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) receptors activate phospholipase C in response to carboxyl-truncated analogs of PTH(1–34). Endocrinology. 1998;139:4293–9. [PubMed] 26. Takasu H, Gardella TJ, Luck MD, Potts JT, Jr, Bringhurst FR. Amino-terminal modifications of human parathyroid hormone (PTH) selectively alter phospholipase C signaling via the type 1 PTH receptor: implications for design of signal-specific PTH ligands. Biochemistry. 1999;38:13453–60. [PubMed] 27. Takasu H, Guo J, Bringhurst FR. Dual signaling and ligand selectivity of the human PTH/PTHrP receptor. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:11–20. [PubMed] 28. Valenta A, Roschger P, Fratzl-Zelman N, Kostenuik PJ, Dunstan CR, Fratzl P, Klaushofer K. Combined treatment with PTH (1–34) and OPG increases bone volume and uniformity of mineralization in aged ovariectomized rats. Bone. 2005 29. Whitfield JF, Morley P, Willick GE, MacLean S, Ross V, Barbier J, Isaacs RJ. Stimulation of femoral trabecular bone growth in ovariectomized rats by human parathyroid hormone (hPTH)-(1-30)NH(2). Calcif Tissue Int. 1999;65:143–7. [PubMed] 30. Whitfield JF, Morley P, Willick GE, Ross V, Barbier JR, Isaacs RJ, Ohannessian-Barry L. Stimulation of the growth of femoral trabecular bone in ovariectomized rats by the novel parathyroid hormone fragment, hPTH-(1–31)NH2 (Ostabolin). Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;58:81–7. [PubMed] 31. Yang D, Guo J, Divieti P, Bringhurst FR. Parathyroid hormone activates PKC-delta and regulates osteoblastic differentiation via a PLC-independent pathway. Bone. 2006;38:485–96. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Apr; 84(4):1214-9.
[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999]J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Apr; 11(4):421-9.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1996]J Bone Miner Res. 1992 May; 7(5):479-84.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1992]Bone. 2000 Oct; 27(4):471-8.
[Bone. 2000]Br Med J. 1980 Jun 7; 280(6228):1340-4.
[Br Med J. 1980]Br Med J. 1980 Jun 7; 280(6228):1340-4.
[Br Med J. 1980]Bone. 2006 Apr; 38(4):485-96.
[Bone. 2006]Bone. 1996 Nov; 19(5):469-77.
[Bone. 1996]J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Aug; 9(8):1179-89.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1994]J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Jun; 9(6):943-9.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1994]Biochemistry. 1999 Oct 12; 38(41):13453-60.
[Biochemistry. 1999]J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1999]J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1999]Bone. 2006 Apr; 38(4):485-96.
[Bone. 2006]Lancet. 2005 Oct 29-Nov 4; 366(9496):1523-4; author reply 1524-5.
[Lancet. 2005]Endocrinology. 2005 Apr; 146(4):1854-62.
[Endocrinology. 2005]Osteoporos Int. 2002 May; 13(5):358-65.
[Osteoporos Int. 2002]J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Apr; 20(4):635-43.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2005]J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jul; 14(7):1167-74.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1999]Bone. 2006 Apr; 38(4):485-96.
[Bone. 2006]Bone. 1996 Nov; 19(5):469-77.
[Bone. 1996]J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Aug; 9(8):1179-89.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1994]Endocrinology. 1998 Oct; 139(10):4293-9.
[Endocrinology. 1998]Biochemistry. 1999 Oct 12; 38(41):13453-60.
[Biochemistry. 1999]Calcif Tissue Int. 1999 Aug; 65(2):143-7.
[Calcif Tissue Int. 1999]Lancet. 2005 Oct 29-Nov 4; 366(9496):1523-4; author reply 1524-5.
[Lancet. 2005]Bone. 1996 Nov; 19(5):469-77.
[Bone. 1996]Bone. 2000 Oct; 27(4):471-8.
[Bone. 2000]J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Aug; 9(8):1179-89.
[J Bone Miner Res. 1994]Calcif Tissue Int. 1996 Feb; 58(2):81-7.
[Calcif Tissue Int. 1996]