![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Spee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Major HGF-mediated regenerative pathways are similarly affected in human and canine cirrhosis 1Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands 2Department of Morphology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium Corresponding author.#Contributed equally. Bart Spee: B.Spee/at/vet.uu.nl; Brigitte Arends: B.Arends/at/vet.uu.nl; Ted SGAM van den Ingh: t.s.g.a.m.vandeningh/at/wanadoo.nl; Tania Roskams: tania.roskams/at/uz.kuleuven.ac.be; Jan Rothuizen: J.Rothuizen/at/vet.uu.nl; Louis C Penning: L.C.Penning/at/vet.uu.nl Received December 19, 2006; Accepted July 31, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background The availability of non-rodent animal models for human cirrhosis is limited. We investigated whether privately-owned dogs (Canis familiaris) are potential model animals for liver disease focusing on regenerative pathways. Several forms of canine hepatitis were examined: Acute Hepatitis (AH), Chronic Hepatitis (CH), Lobular Dissecting Hepatitis (LDH, a specific form of micronodulair cirrhosis), and Cirrhosis (CIRR). Canine cirrhotic samples were compared to human liver samples from cirrhotic stages of alcoholic liver disease (hALC) and chronic hepatitis C infection (hHC). Results Canine specific mRNA expression of the regenerative hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signaling pathway and relevant down-stream pathways were measured by semi-quantitative PCR and Western blot (STAT3, PKB, ERK1/2, and p38-MAPK). In all canine groups, levels of c-MET mRNA (proto-oncogenic receptor for HGF) were significantly decreased (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, ERK1/2 and p38-MAPK were increased in CH and LDH. In the human liver samples Western blotting indicated a high homology of down-stream pathways between different etiologies (hALC and hHC). Similarly activated pathways were found in CIRR, hALC, and hHC. Conclusion In canine hepatitis and cirrhosis the major regenerative downstream pathways were activated. Signaling pathways are similarly activated in human cirrhotic liver samples, irrespective of the differences in etiology in the human samples (alcohol abuse and HCV-infection). Therefore, canine hepatitis and cirrhosis could be an important clinical model to evaluate novel interventions prior to human clinical trials. Background Chronic hepatitis (CH) and end-stage cirrhosis (CIRR) are an increasing medical problem, affecting over 5% of the world population [1,2]. The best-studied animal model for these liver diseases is tetracarbon-induced fibrotic liver diseases inflicted in rats [3]. Many more models have been devised to mimic liver diseases in man; the time-course of the development however, is not always comparable to the human situation [4-8]. Furthermore, the variability in the affected human population regarding, sex, age, social factors, eating- and drinking behavior, body weight etc. is not fully covered in standardized laboratory conditions. Dogs have liver diseases which are clinically highly comparable with the human counterparts and both species have a high resemblance at the genetic level [9,10]. In contrast to rodent models, hepatitis in these dogs is not deliberately induced. Previous studies already showed a high resemblance between man and dogs in the formation of fibrosis during liver diseases [11]. Furthermore dogs share many years in close proximity of humans exposing them to the same environmental and biological stresses. Recently, detailed clinical and histological diagnostic standards have been published for all liver diseases of dogs [12]. Corroborating the histological similarities between human and dogs, examples are provided in Figure Figure1.1
Liver regeneration is a complex interplay of different factors [14]. One of the main growth factors identified in liver regeneration is Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF). HGF activates the proto-oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase c-MET and subsequent down-stream pathways, including the anti-apoptotic protein kinase-B (PKB/Akt) cascade, the proliferative MAP-kinase pathway (ERK1/2 and p38MAPK), and the STAT3 signaling (signal transducers and activators of transcription) [15-17]. At present, a comparison between these regeneration signal transduction pathways in human and canine livers is missing, hampering the application of dogs as (pre-) clinical model animals for human medicine. We have analyzed HGF-mediated regeneration signaling in canine samples from dogs with Acute Hepatitis (AH), Chronic Hepatitis (CH), and Lobular Dissecting Hepatitis (LDH, a specific form of micronodulair cirrhosis similar to neonatal hepatitis in human hepatology) [18,19], and CIRR. The cirrhotic samples were compared to two human cirrhotic diseases with different etiologies; HCV-induced (hHC) and alcohol-induced (hALC). This study will elucidate the potential of (non-experimental) dogs to bridge between toxin-induced rodent models and human clinical situation. Results HGF/c-MET signaling pathways involved in liver regeneration in dogs with AH, CH, CIRR, and LDH Statistically significant differences (ANOVA) were identified in the expression of mRNA encoding HGF (P < .001) and c-MET (P < .001). Towards healthy control samples HGF mRNA levels were significantly induced in CH, LDH, and CIRR, three-, five-, and five-fold, respectively (Figure (Figure2A).2A
Western blot analysis on STAT3, PKB/Akt, ERK1/2, and p38MAPK in canine liver homogenates In Figure Figure33
Western blot analysis on human cirrhotic explant samples after alcohol abuse (hALC) and after hepatitis C virus infection (hHC) Western blot analysis on HGF in hALC and hHC samples showed a detectable 80 kDa HGF in all samples with minor quantitative differences (Figure (Figure4).4
Discussion To investigate if hepatic regenerative signal transduction pathways are similarly affected in liver diseases between man and dogs, the expression of HGF and c-MET was measured. Furthermore, Western blot analysis was used to show (de)activation of important signaling pathways of liver regeneration. This provided insight into major regeneration pathways in AH, CH, LDH, CIRR. A comparison between canine cirrhosis and human cirrhotic samples with different etiologies provided additional information on the suitability of the canine-model. The increased mRNA levels of HGF and the decreased levels of c-MET mRNA in fibrotic canine diseases (CH, LDH, and CIRR), were in line with publications from human samples [20]. Together this suggests that HGF-mediated regeneration in human cirrhosis is similarly affected in canine CH, LDH, and CIRR. The reduced c-MET protein levels indicate a utilization of c-MET which is degraded through endocytosis after phosphorylation. Intracellular degradation is dependent on the interaction with Cbl ubiquitin ligases [21]. Semi-quantitative hepatocyte proliferation studies on canine samples with a Ki67 antibody indicate a moderate hepatocyte proliferation in CH; whereas cirrhotic samples (CIRR and LDH) as well as healthy samples are virtually negative (data not shown). Similar results have been described in human chronic and cirrhotic liver samples, irrespective of the etiology [22,23]. This indicates the ability of hepatocytes to proliferate after c-MET activation in more chronic stages while cirrhotic samples do not complete the cell-cycle of which the cause remains to be elucidated. To further substantiate the molecular comparison between human and canine fibrotic livers the activation status of HGF/c-MET downstream signaling components involved in regeneration was analyzed. HCV cirrhotic samples had high levels of Ser-phosphorylated STAT3 compared to alcohol induced cirrhotic samples. This HCV-induced up regulation of STAT3 phosphorylation was shown before in man and rodent models in vivo as well as in vitro studies on cell-lines [24,25]. In other studies the levels of STAT phosphorylation indicated phosphorylated STAT3 protein in HCV affected cirrhotic livers compared to primary biliary cirrhotic samples and healthy tissue [26]. In the canine samples including the healthy control biopsies STAT3-Ser phosphorylation was strongly present. The levels of STAT3-Tyr phosphorylation were the lowest in AH and strongest in LDH. As the amount of STAT3-Tyr phosphorylation indicates the DNA binding capacity of the protein, the pathways seems to be activated in fibrotic diseases and not in acute hepatitis. Next to STAT3 phosphorylation, HCV induces ERK1/2 phosphorylation [27]. In the canine samples, an up regulation of the levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 was observed in CH and LDH. Finally, the increase in p38MAPK phosphorylation as observed in CH, LDH, and CIRR has been described in fibrotic tissues in man [28]. In general, HGF/c-MET downstream signaling in CH, LDH, and CIRR is to a high degree comparable with the molecular data obtained from human clinical samples. Surgical animal models for liver regeneration, such as partial hepatectomy (PH), represent an over-simplification by the absence of inflammation or overperfusion; furthermore, all hepatocytes are stimulated by PH to enter the G1 phase simultaneously. Toxic models induced by dimethylnitrosamine, CCl4, acetominophen, or thioacetamide can represent chronic as well as acute/fulminant hepatitis [29-31]. Toxic models are better clinical models as hepatotoxins can be used to selectively induce centrolobular and periportal necrotic lesions and thus mimic clinical liver diseases. However, toxin-induced models do not represent the full range of changes seen in human liver diseases [32]. Comparison between canine and human diseases was obtained by using cirrhotic human samples derived from alcohol abuse or hepatitis C infection, two of the most common causes of hepatitis in the Western world [33,34]. As in humans, chronic hepatitis in dogs is associated with progressive fibrosis, reduction in liver size and regeneration, and finally disruption of the liver architecture (cirrhosis), which may cause portal hypertension, ascites, and portosystemic encephalopathy [35]. Although histologically highly comparable to their human counterparts, the etiology of canine hepatitis is largely unknown [36]. However, human samples (hALC and hHC) showed the same degree of activation in the signal transduction pathways, irrespective of the different underlying etiology. Therefore, despite unknown etiology in dogs the underlying mechanisms are similarly activated. Conclusion This study is the first to measure expression profiles of crucial pathways of liver regeneration in canine liver diseases in comparison with man. Previously, a high similarity of affected fibrotic pathways between human- and canine-liver diseases was found [11]. Combining these measurements on fibrotic- and regenerative-signaling pathways, privately owned dogs may help to fill in the gap between toxin-induced rodent models and human diseases. Furthermore, this study provides the basis to analyze more acute forms of hepatitis such as (sub)acute hepatitis in dog. Taken together, these results indicated that CH, LDH, and CIRR are suitable spontaneous large animal models to evaluate the clinical application of therapies such as cell transplantation or the administration of growth factors. Methods Animals All samples were obtained from privately owned canines of different breeds referred to our veterinary clinic. All procedures were approved by Utrecht University's Ethical Committee, as required under Dutch legislation. Each disease group (n = 11 dogs) was compared to age-matched healthy control dogs (n = 12), without clinical signs of hepatitis or other disease (histopathology did not reveal any abnormalities). Liver biopsies were obtained (ultrasound-guided) from all dogs under local anesthesia with a true cut 14G biopsy needle, preceded by ultrasonographic evaluation of the liver to exclude non-homogeneous hepatic changes. Two formalin-fixed biopsies were embedded in paraffin, sliced, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin-, van Gieson-, and reticulin-stain according to Gordon and Sweet. All histological examinations were performed by one experienced, certified veterinary pathologist. Two other biopsies were snap-frozen and stored at -70°C until molecular analysis. Human patients All liver samples were obtained from surgical patients transplanted at the Department of Abdominal Transplantation in the University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. The procedures were approved by Leuven University's Ethical Committee, as required under Belgian legislation. Human explant samples were collected directly after surgery and immediately snap-frozen. All patients, predominantly male, were presented with micronodular cirrhosis. The Alcoholic Cirrhosis (hALC) group contained five patients (n = 5) characterized by cirrhosis with neutrophil infiltrations, alcohol related morphological changes (hepatocyte ballooning, Mallory bodies, necrosis), and in some cases steatosis and increased iron deposition. The Hepatitis C (hHC) group contained four patients (n = 4) characterized by cirrhosis with neutrophil infiltrations, lymphoid follicles and aggregates. All cases were presented with hepatocyte decay, apoptosis/necrosis, regeneration, and fibrosis. Quantitative PCR Quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) was performed on HGF and c-MET. The abundance of mRNA was determined by reverse transcription followed by real-time quantitative PCR using appropriate primers (Table 1), as described previously [37]. For each experimental sample, two endogenous reference genes (GAPDH and HPRT) were included. The use of two reference genes is sufficient for reliable data [38]. Results were normalized according to the average amount of the endogenous references. The relative gene-expression of each gene-product was used as the basis for all comparisons. The results were assessed for normality and homogeneity of variances using, respectively, the Kolmogorov Smirnoff and the Levene tests. The data were normally distributed and variances complied; therefore differences between means were determined by One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by the (2-sided) Dunnett post-test analysis of all groups towards control (healthy) samples. A P-value < 0.05 indicated significant changes.
Immunoblot analysis Twenty micrograms of pooled protein extracts (n = 6 dogs per group, randomly chosen) was separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham-Biosciences, Cleveland, OH). The procedure for immunodetection was based on an ECL-Western blot analysis system, as previously described [39]. Primary antibodies are depicted in Table 2. Densitometric analysis was performed with a Geldoc2000 system with QuantityOne 4.3.0 software (Biorad). Human samples (protein load twenty micrograms) were analyzed separately; the immunoblot analysis was the same as for the dog protein extracts.
Abbreviations AH – Acute Hepatitis; CH – Chronic Hepatitis; HGF – Hepatocyte Growth Factor; LDH – Lobular Dissecting Hepatitis; CIRR – Cirrhosis; ERK1/2 – Mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) 1 and 3; hALC – cirrhotic stage of alcoholic liver disease; hHC – cirrhotic stage of chronic hepatitis C infection; p38-MAPK – Mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) 14; PH – Partial Hepatectomy; PKB – Protein Kinase B; Q-PCR – Quantitative real-time PCR; STAT3 – Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3. Competing interests Despite this research was partially funded by the animal health company Intervet International, the authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interests. Authors' contributions BS and BA contributed equally in writing the manuscript. BS performed the Q-PCR measurements. BA performed all Western blot experiments. TI examined the histochemical samples described in this manuscript. TR provided the human liver samples and participated in the study design. JR and LP participated in the study design and coordination of the different experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements The authors thank Dr. Libbrecht for the (description of) the human samples. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Ann Hepatol. 2006 Jan-Mar; 5(1):16-24.
[Ann Hepatol. 2006]Methods Mol Med. 2005; 117():237-50.
[Methods Mol Med. 2005]Int J Exp Pathol. 2006 Feb; 87(1):1-16.
[Int J Exp Pathol. 2006]Dig Dis. 2005; 23(3-4):181-94.
[Dig Dis. 2005]Genome Res. 2005 Dec; 15(12):1706-16.
[Genome Res. 2005]Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Dec; 5(12):900-10.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2004]Liver Int. 2006 Aug; 26(6):716-25.
[Liver Int. 2006]Cell. 2006 Jan 27; 124(2):229-31.
[Cell. 2006]J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Oct; 197(4):634-59.
[J Am Coll Surg. 2003]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Dec; 4(12):915-25.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Sep 19; 309(2):298-304.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003]Vet Pathol. 1983 Mar; 20(2):179-88.
[Vet Pathol. 1983]J Vet Intern Med. 1994 May-Jun; 8(3):217-20.
[J Vet Intern Med. 1994]Liver Int. 2004 Aug; 24(4):335-44.
[Liver Int. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Apr; 14(4):1346-54.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2003]Hepatology. 1996 Jun; 23(6):1468-75.
[Hepatology. 1996]Liver Int. 2006 May; 26(4):424-32.
[Liver Int. 2006]J Exp Med. 2002 Sep 2; 196(5):641-53.
[J Exp Med. 2002]Oncogene. 2001 May 3; 20(20):2606-10.
[Oncogene. 2001]Hepatology. 2003 Oct; 38(4):879-89.
[Hepatology. 2003]Am J Physiol. 1999 Mar; 276(3 Pt 1):G629-38.
[Am J Physiol. 1999]J Hepatol. 1998 Apr; 28(4):608-14.
[J Hepatol. 1998]Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Apr; 11(4):393-400.
[Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999]Liver Int. 2006 Aug; 26(6):716-25.
[Liver Int. 2006]