• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Aug 2007; 176(4): 2421–2425.
PMCID: PMC1950642

Hybridization in Large-Bodied New World Primates

Abstract

Well-documented cases of natural hybridization among primates are not common. In New World primates, natural hybridization has been reported only for small-bodied species, but no genotypic data have ever been gathered that confirm these reports. Here we present genetic evidence of hybridization of two large-bodied species of neotropical primates that diverged ~3 MYA. We used species-diagnostic mitochondrial and microsatellite loci and the Y chromosome Sry gene to determine the hybrid status of 36 individuals collected from an area of sympatry in Tabasco, Mexico. Thirteen individuals were hybrids. We show that hybridization and subsequent backcrosses are directionally biased and that the only likely cross between parental species produces fertile hybrid females, but fails to produce viable or fertile males. This system can be used as a model to study gene interchange between primate species that have not achieved complete reproductive isolation.

HYBRIDIZATION can be viewed as either a breakdown of species boundaries that could eventually result in the loss of pure parental species or a creative force that can lead to the formation of new recombinant lineages (Arnold 1997; Dowling and Secor 1997; Barton 2001; Mallet 2005; Arnold and Meyer 2006). Regardless of which view is taken, studies of hybridization are crucial for understanding the basis of reproductive isolation and the origins of biodiversity (Coyne and Orr 2004). Hybridization among metazoans has traditionally been viewed as an unusual event, but a variety of genetic studies in the past few decades have shown that this phenomenon is rather common, especially between closely related taxa (Mallet 2005). Among primates, natural hybridization occurs in at least 26 of ~233 Old World species (e.g., baboons, guenons, macaques, lemurs) in which hybridization occurs at intraspecific (Groves 1978; Lernould 1988), interspecific (Phillipsconroy and Jolly 1986; Samuels and Altmann 1986; Struhsaker et al. 1988; Watanabe and Matsumura 1991; Bynum et al. 1997; Evans et al. 2001; Wyner et al. 2002), and even intergeneric levels (Dunbar and Dunbar 1974; Jolly et al. 1997). Among neotropical primates, only 8 of ~132 New World species have been suggested to form hybrids in the wild (Coimbra-Filho et al. 1993; Peres et al. 1996; Mendes 1997) and these include only small-bodied and very recently separated taxa. Furthermore, of the few reported cases of interspecific hybridization in the wild (Silva et al. 1993; Mendes 1997), the taxonomic status of the species is questionable.

Here we present evidence of hybridization of two large-bodied neotropical primates, Alouatta palliata and A. pigra. These are morphologically (Lawrence 1933; Smith 1970), socially (Crockett and Eisenberg 1987; Treves 2001; Van Belle and Estrada 2006), behaviorally (Crockett and Eisenberg 1987; Neville et al. 1988; Whitehead 1995), and genetically (Cortés-Ortiz et al. 2003) distinct howler monkey species that diverged ~3 MYA (Cortés-Ortiz et al. 2003). A. palliata is currently found from southern Veracruz in Mexico through the central part of Guatemala and the southern part of Belize, continuing to the south through Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, and the Pacific coast of Colombia and Ecuador. On the other hand, A. pigra is confined to the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico, Belize, and the central and eastern part of Guatemala (Figure 1). Although A. palliata and A. pigra are allopatric in most of their range, Smith (1970) reported an area of sympatry in the state of Tabasco, Mexico. Currently this area is highly deforested and only small patches of vegetation with various degrees of disturbance can be found. During a series of expeditions, we surveyed the area where sympatry had been reported and found troops with individuals of both A. palliata and A. pigra (based initially on morphological characters), as well as individuals that possessed morphological features of both species. Using a multilocus approach, we present genetic data that show that these howler monkeys are hybridizing in Mexico.

Figure 1.
Geographic distribution of A. palliata and A. pigra, and approximate location of troops sampled. Letters represent different troops. Localities: open circles contain A. palliata individuals, solid circles contain A. pigra individuals, and shaded circles ...

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood and/or hair samples were collected from A. palliata and A. pigra individuals from sites in Tabasco, Mexico and other areas throughout Mexico (Figure 1). Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Primers for eight microsatellite loci [Ap68 (Ellsworth and Hoelzer 1998), Ap74 (Ellsworth and Hoelzer 1998), PEPC8 (Escobar-Páramo 2000), and MapPairs (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) loci D5S111, D6S260, D8S165, D14S51, and D17S804] were used to identify diagnostic alleles in each species and to identify hybrid individuals on the basis of the presence of these alleles. We used primers CB1-5′ and CB2-3′ (Palumbi 1996) to amplify a region of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene and/or primers LCO-CO2-L and LCO-CO3-H (Cortés-Ortiz et al. 2003) to amplify a fragment of the ATP-synthase 6 and 8 genes (ATPase). A fragment of the Y chromosome Sry gene was amplified using primers SW2 (Whitfield et al. 1993) and SRY (Moreira 2002). To determine whether hybridization and subsequent crosses are directionally biased, we used a chi-square goodness-of-fit test to compare the observed frequencies of genotypes of hybrid individuals to those expected if all possible crosses among hybrids and backcrosses with parental species occur. We also estimated the probabilities of observing the detected genotypes on the basis of equal proportions of alleles/haplotypes in the parental species.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We genotyped 104 individuals of A. palliata and A. pigra and putative hybrid individuals for the eight microsatellite loci. These individuals include 40 A. palliata and 28 A. pigra individuals from outside of the putative hybrid zone and 36 individuals from within this zone (Figure 1). On the basis of the genotypes of A. palliata and A. pigra outside of the zone, three loci contained alleles that were distinct for each species (Ap68, D5S111, and D8S185) (Table 1). Sequences of these alleles confirmed that size differences are due to differences in the number of repeat units. The two species shared alleles at the other loci examined or potentially diagnostic alleles occurred at low frequencies in one or the other species. Several alleles showed clines in allele frequencies through the hybrid zone. We also sequenced a 307-bp region of the mitochondrial cytb gene and/or an 817-bp fragment of the ATPase locus from the same 104 individuals listed above (GenBank accession nos. DQ875685DQ875741 and DQ875611DQ875672, respectively). Sequences from the two parental species have fixed differences at 14 sites for the cytb fragment and 46 sites for the ATPase fragment, and each locus showed ~5% sequence divergence among species. On the basis of these levels of sequence divergence, A. palliata and A. pigra likely separated ~3 MYA (Cortés-Ortiz et al. 2003).

TABLE 1
Frequencies of alleles of microsatellite loci of populations of A. palliata and A. pigra from outside and within the putative hybrid zone (including hybrids)

In total, 23 individuals from the putative hybrid zone wholly possessed alleles of either A. palliata (n = 11) or A. pigra (n = 12) and contained the respective species' mitochondrial haplotype; this suggests that individuals of both parental species are nearly equally abundant within the hybrid zone. Thirteen other individuals were identified as hybrids on the basis of mitochondrial and microsatellite data (Table 2). The hybrid individuals included seven adult females, one infant female, and five adult males. Twelve individuals possessed microsatellite alleles, diagnostic of both parental species, although no individuals were F1 hybrids (Table 2). The lack of F1's may be because these individuals are ephemeral, or the hybrid zone is old, or it could reflect a low incidence of hybridization of pure parental forms (see Goodman et al. 1999). All adult hybrids contained the mitochondrial haplotype of A. pigra. The infant was the only hybrid that possessed A. palliata's haplotype. The presumed mother of this infant (based on genotypic data and the fact that the female was carrying the infant) was pure A. palliata based on the genetic markers used here and her appearance and occurred with a hybrid male that was likely the father of this infant based on the genotypic evidence. Hybrid individuals occurred in fragmented habitats where the two species' distributions overlap and were members of “mixed troops” that contained individuals of both parental species and in some cases individuals with unique or intermediate morphologies (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
General appearance of Alouatta palliata, A. pigra, and hybrid individuals. (A) A. palliata male from within the hybrid zone; (B) hybrid male that occurred with an A. palliata female and a hybrid female (note that males A and B belonged to different neighboring ...
TABLE 2
Hybrid individuals in the area of species overlap that showed mixed A. palliata and A. pigra character states

We attempted amplifications of a region of the Sry gene with genomic DNA of 4 A. palliata males, 2 A. palliata females, 3 A. pigra males, and 2 A. pigra females from outside of the putative hybrid zone and all 13 individuals from within the hybrid zone that were characterized as hybrids. Amplifications were successful only with genomic extractions of males; this and the fact that direct sequencing of amplification products yielded chromatograms without double peaks or other ambiguities strongly imply that the gene amplified occurs on the Y chromosome in these individuals. The sequences obtained from individuals outside of the hybrid zone were ~821 bp in length and showed fixed differences at three sites among species (GenBank accession nos. DQ875673DQ875684). All male hybrid individuals (n = 5) possessed the Sry gene of A. pigra (Table 2).

If matings of hybrids are random and occur among all possible combinations of hybrids and parental species, we expect to find equal frequencies of the four possible genotypes of males and the two possible genotypes of females at the maternally inherited mitochondrial locus and the paternally inherited nuclear locus located on the Y chromosome of males. Although sample sizes are small, the chi-square goodness-of-fit tests suggest that the observed frequencies of males' and females' genotypes differed significantly from these expectations (Table 3). Moreover, probabilities of detecting 12 adult hybrids with the mitochondrial haplotype of A. pigra (P = 2.4 × 10−4), 12 hybrid individuals with the mitochondrial haplotype of A. pigra plus 1 hybrid individual with the mitochondrial haplotype of A. palliata (P = 1.6 × 10−3), and all 5 hybrid males with the Sry gene of A. pigra (P = 3.1 × 10−2) are low. These patterns imply that the direction of hybridization and subsequent backcrosses is strongly biased. Only crosses between A. pigra females or hybrid females carrying the mitochondrial haplotype of A. pigra and A. palliata males or hybrid males with the Sry gene of A. palliata occur and give rise to female offspring (Figure 3). However, no male hybrids with the Sry gene of A. palliata were observed and so, in accordance with Haldane's rule (Haldane 1922), the data strongly suggest that the aforementioned crosses fail to produce viable males. Furthermore, on the basis of the low probability of detecting only the mtDNA haplotype of A. palliata in 12 adult hybrid individuals, A. palliata females and A. pigra males or hybrid males either mate infrequently or typically fail to produce viable offspring. Nonetheless, the genotypes of the hybrid infant and its suspected parents imply that this infant (S157, Table 2) was produced from a backcross between a male hybrid (S154, Table 2) and a female A. palliata. This demonstrates that such matings occur and that female offspring are produced. However, because no adult females were observed with the mitochondrial haplotype of A. palliata, we suspect that such crosses are uncommon or this infant is either infertile or will not survive to reproductive age.

Figure 3.
Possible outcomes of crosses between A. palliata (Apa) and A. pigra (Api) males and females, according to the specific identification of mitochondrial and Y chromosome markers. See text for explanation.
TABLE 3
Observed and expected frequencies of genotypes if all possible crosses among hybrids and backcrosses with parental species are equally likely

We are currently investigating the potential role of morphological, behavioral, genetic, and cytogenetic differences as causes of the bias in direction of hybridization of these species. This work should advance our understanding of the speciation process and origins of reproductive isolation among primates, as well as the role of hybridization in primate evolution (Arnold and Meyer 2006). Moreover, study of the presence of hybrids in fragmented and intact forest tracts will reveal whether human-induced forest fragmentation has instigated hybridization by confining members of both species to small areas and limiting access to conspecific mates.

Acknowledgments

The Secretaría del Medioambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico, and the Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente, Panama, are gratefully acknowledged for providing the collecting, export, and import permits that made our research possible. This research was supported by the PROMEP Ph.D. scholarship no. UVER 98-11-019 and PROMEP 103.5/03/1154EXB-9 to L.C.-O., by the Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana. Financial support was also provided by the Smithsonian Molecular Systematics program and by the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan.

Notes

Sequence data for this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. DQ875611DQ875741.

References

  • Arnold, M. L., 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Arnold, M. L., and A. Meyer, 2006. Natural hybridization in primates: One evolutionary mechanism. Zoology 109: 261–276. [PubMed]
  • Barton, N. H., 2001. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 10: 551–568. [PubMed]
  • Bynum, E. L., D. Z. Bynum and J. Supriatna, 1997. Confirmation and location of the hybrid zone between wild populations of Macaca tonkeana and Macaca hecki in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Am. J. Primatol. 43: 181–209. [PubMed]
  • Coimbra-Filho, A. F., A. Pissinatti and A. B. Rylands, 1993. Experimental multiple hybridism among Callithrix species from eastern Brazil, pp. 95–120 in Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematic, Ecology and Behaviour, edited by A. B. Rylands. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Cortés-Ortiz, L., E. Bermingham, C. Rico, E. Rodríguez-Luna, I. Sampaio et al., 2003. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the Neotropical monkey genus, Alouatta. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26: 64–81. [PubMed]
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr, 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Crockett, C. M., and J. F. Eisenberg, 1987. Howlers: variations in group size and demography, pp. 54–68 in Primate Societies, edited by B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham and T. Struhsaker. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Dowling, T. E., and C. L. Secor, 1997. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 593–619.
  • Dunbar, R. I. M., and P. Dunbar, 1974. On hybridization between Theropithecus gelada and Papio anubis in the wild. J. Hum. Evol. 3: 187–192.
  • Ellsworth, J. A., and G. A. Hoelzer, 1998. Characterization of microsatellite loci in a New World primate, the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata). Mol. Ecol. 7: 657–666. [PubMed]
  • Escobar-Páramo, P., 2000. Microsatellite primers for the wild brown capuchin monkey Cebus apella. Mol. Ecol. 9: 107–108. [PubMed]
  • Evans, B. J., J. Supriatna and D. J. Melnick, 2001. Hybridization and population genetics of two macaque species in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Evolution 55: 1686–1702. [PubMed]
  • Goodman, S. J., N. H. Barton, G. Swanson, K. Abernethy and J. M. Pemberton, 1999. Introgression through rare hybridization: a genetic study of a hybrid zone between red and sika deer (genus Cervus) in Argyll, Scotland. Genetics 152: 355–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Groves, C. P., 1978. Phylogenetic and population systematics of the mangabeys (Primates: Cercopithecoidea). Primates 19: 1–34.
  • Haldane, J. B. S., 1922. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12: 101–109.
  • Jolly, C. J., T. Woolley-Barker, S. Beyene, T. R. Disotell and J. E. Phillips-Conroy, 1997. Intergeneric hybrid baboons. Int. J. Primatol. 18: 597–627.
  • Lawrence, B., 1933. Howler monkeys of the palliata group. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 75: 313–354.
  • Lernould, J. M., 1988. Classification and geographical distribution of guenons: a review, pp. 54–78 in A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons, edited by A. Gautier-Hion, F. Bourliere, J. P. Gautier and J. Kingdon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Mallet, J., 2005. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 229–237. [PubMed]
  • Mendes, S. L., 1997. Hybridization in free-ranging Callithrix flaviceps and the taxonomy of the Atlantic forest marmosets. Neotrop. Primates 5: 6–8.
  • Moreira, M. A. M., 2002. SRY evolution in Cebidae (Platyrrhini: Primates). J. Mol. Evol. 55: 92–103. [PubMed]
  • Neville, M. K., K. E. Glander, F. Braza and A. B. Rylands, 1988. The howling monkeys, genus Alouatta, pp. 349–453 in Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, edited by R. Mittermeier, A. B. Rylands, A. Coimbra-Filho and G. B. A. Fonseca. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC.
  • Palumbi, S. R., 1996. Nucleic acids II: The polymerase chain reaction, pp. 205–247 in Molecular Systematics, edited by D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Peres, C., J. L. Patton and M. N. F. da Silva, 1996. Riverine barriers and gene flow in Amazonian saddle-back tamarins. Folia Primatol. 67: 113–124. [PubMed]
  • Phillipsconroy, J. E., and C. J. Jolly, 1986. Changes in the structure of the baboon hybrid zone in the Awash National Park, Ethiopia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 71: 337–350.
  • Samuels, A., and J. Altmann, 1986. Immigration of a Papio anubis male into a group of cynocephalus baboons and evidence for a anubis-cynocephalus hybrid zone in Amboseli, Kenya. Int. J. Primatol. 7: 131–138.
  • Silva, B. T. F., M. I. C. Sampaio, H. Schneider, M. P. C. Schneider, E. Montoya et al., 1993. Protein electrophoretic variability in Saimiri and the question of its species status. Am. J. Primatol. 29: 183–193.
  • Smith, J. D., 1970. The systematic status of the black howler monkey, Alouatta pigra Lawrence. J. Mammal. 51: 358–369.
  • Struhsaker, T. T., T. M. Butynski and J. S. Lwanga, 1988. Hybridization between redtail (Cercopithecus ascanius schmidti) and blue (C. mitis stuhlmanni) monkeys in the Kibale Forest, Uganda, pp. 477–497 in A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons, edited by A. Gautier-Hion, F. Bourliere, J. P. Gautier and J. Kingdon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Treves, A., 2001. Reproductive consequences of variation in the composition of howler monkey (Alouatta spp.) groups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 61–71.
  • Van Belle, S., and A. Estrada, 2006. Demographic features of Alouatta pigra populations in extensive and fragmented forest, pp. 121–142 in New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior, and Conservation, edited by A. Estrada, P. Garber, M. Pavelka and L. Luecke. Kluwer Academic Press, New York.
  • Watanabe, K., and S. Matsumura, 1991. The borderlands and possible hybrids between 3 species of macaques, M. nigra, M. nigrescens, and M. hecki in the northern peninsula of Sulawesi. Primates 32: 365–369.
  • Whitehead, J. M., 1995. Vox Alouattinae—a preliminary survey of acoustic characteristics of long-distance calls of howling monkeys. Int. J. Primatol. 16: 121–144.
  • Whitfield, L. S., R. Lovell-Badge and P. N. Goodfellow, 1993. Rapid sequence evolution of the mammalian sex-determining gene SRY. Nature 364: 713–715. [PubMed]
  • Wyner, Y. M., S. E. Johnson, R. M. Stumpf and R. Desalle, 2002. Genetic assessment of a white-collared x red-fronted lemur hybrid zone at Andringitra, Madagascar. Am. J. Primatol. 67: 51–66. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...