![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Khan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Analysis of the contribution of cellular and viral RNA to the packaging of APOBEC3G into HIV-1 virions 1Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Viral Biochemistry Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 4, Room 310, 4 Center Drive, MSC 0460, Bethesda, MD 20892-0460, USA Corresponding author.Mohammad A Khan: mkhan/at/niaid.nih.gov; Ritu Goila-Gaur: rgaur/at/niaid.nih.gov; Sandrine Opi: opi/at/marseille.inserm.fr; Eri Miyagi: emiyagi/at/niaid.nih.gov; Hiroaki Takeuchi: htake/at/ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp; Sandra Kao: skao/at/niaid.nih.gov; Klaus Strebel: kstrebel/at/niaid.nih.gov Received May 4, 2007; Accepted July 16, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Efficient incorporation of the cellular cytidine deaminase APOBEC3G (APO3G) into HIV-1 virions is necessary for its antiviral activity. Even though cellular RNAs are known to be non-specifically incorporated into virus particles, we have previously found that encapsidation of APO3G into HIV-1 virions is specifically enhanced by viral genomic RNA. Intracellularly, APO3G was found to form large RNA-protein complexes involving a variety of cellular RNAs. The goal of this study was to investigate the possible contribution of host RNAs recently identified in intracellular APO3G ribonucleoprotein complexes to APO3G's encapsidation into HIV-1 virions. Results Our results show that 7SL RNA, a component of signal recognition particles, and hY1, hY3, hY4, hY5 RNAs were present in intracellular APO3G complexes and were packaged into HIV-1 particles lacking viral genomic RNA unlike APO3G, which was not packaged in significant amounts into genomic RNA-deficient particles. These results indicate that packaging of 7SL or hY RNAs is not sufficient for the packaging of APO3G into HIV-1 virions. We also tested the encapsidation of several other cellular RNAs including β-actin, GAPDH, α-tubulin, and small nuclear RNAs and determined their effect on the packaging of APO3G into nascent virions. Again, we were unable to observe any correlation between APO3G encapsidation and the packaging of any of these cellular RNAs. Conclusion The results from this study support our previous conclusion that viral genomic RNA is a critical determinant for APO3G incorporation into HIV-1 virions. While most cellular RNAs tested in this study were packaged into viruses or virus-like particles we failed to identify a correlation between APO3G encapsidation and the packaging of these cellular RNAs. Background APOBEC3G (APO3G) is a member of the family of cytidine deaminases that in humans include APOBEC1, APOBEC2, seven APOBEC3 variants designated APOBEC3A through 3H, as well as activation-induced deaminase (AID) [1-4]. The protein has potent antiretroviral properties and is expressed in all major target cells susceptible to HIV-1. A crucial prerequisite for antiretroviral activity is the packaging of APO3G into assembling virions. APO3G is efficiently packaged into vif-deficient HIV-1 particles but is largely absent from wild type virions [5-11]. A number of studies have shown that packaging of APO3G into virus-like particles (VLP) is mediated through an interaction with the viral Gag precursor [9,11-17]. In vitro studies demonstrated that the APO3G-Gag interaction is sensitive to RNase-treatment suggesting a possible role of RNA in APO3G encapsidation [9,11,14,17]. Consistent with these studies, we previously observed that efficient packaging of APO3G into vif-deficient HIV-1 particles required the presence of viral genomic RNA [18]. Furthermore, even though small amounts of APO3G were packaged into particles in the absence of viral genomic RNA, such APO3G was sensitive to detergent treatment of the virus and therefore not stably associated with the viral nucleoprotein complex [18]. HIV-1 virions containing genomic RNA packaged approximately 3 times more APO3G and the APO3G found in such virions was largely detergent resistant, indicative of stable association with the viral nucleoprotein complex [18]. Other studies support the significance of viral genomic RNA for the encapsidation of APO3G into HIV-1 particles [16,19,20]. APO3G is an RNA binding protein [21] and recent studies demonstrated that intracellular APO3G can assemble into high molecular mass (HMM) RNA-protein complexes [19,22,23]. Intracellular HMM complexes of APO3G are thought to lack cytidine-deaminase activity and are unable to restrict retrovirus replication [20,22]. Recent analysis of APO3G complexes identified a variety of cellular RNAs including Alu and hY retroelements as well as mRNAs encoding APO3G, ubiquitin, and protein phosphatase 2A [19,23]. On the other hand, messenger RNA encoding α-tubulin was not identified in APO3G complexes [23]. Similarly, β-actin mRNA was found to be absent from [23] or underrepresented in APO3G complexes [19]. Retroviruses including HIV-1 package small cellular RNAs in addition to two copies of viral genomic RNA [24-32]. It is not clear how cellular RNAs are packaged into virions; however, most cellular RNAs appear to be packaged randomly and independent of genomic RNA [28,32]. Furthermore, the efficiency of encapsidation of most of the cellular RNAs seems to reflect their cellular abundance [28,32,33]. One of the first cellular RNAs identified in murine and avian retroviruses is 7SL RNA [34-39]. 7SL RNA is a critical component of the signal recognition particle and is involved in the recognition of the signal peptide during protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum [40]. More recently, 7SL RNA was also identified in HIV-1 virions [28,32]; however, so far no functional significance has been associated with the presence of 7SL RNA in retroviral particles. The current study aimed at the investigation of the possible involvement of cellular RNAs in the encapsidation of APO3G into HIV-1 virions. We focused on RNAs previously identified in intracellular APO3G complexes (e.g. human Y RNAs [23] or HIV-1 RNA [19]) or previously found in retroviral particles (7SL [27,28,32]; snRNAs (U1-U6) [41]). We also analyzed mRNAs previously reported to be excluded from intracellular APO3G complexes (α-tubulin and β-actin [19,23]) and we randomly chose glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to study APO3G binding and virus encapsidation of its mRNA. Our results confirmed the presence of hY1 and hY3 RNAs in intracellular APO3G complexes. In addition, we identified 7SL RNA, U6 snRNA, and GAPDH mRNA as novel components of intracellular APO3G complexes. Only small amounts of α-tubulin mRNA were recovered from APO3G immune complexes as reported before [23]; On the other hand, β-actin mRNA was clearly associated with APO3G complexes in our analysis thus contrasting earlier reports. Most of these RNAs were also packaged into HIV-1 virions. Interestingly, packaging of hY RNAs appeared to be inhibited by the presence of genomic RNA while packaging of other cellular RNAs including 7SL RNA was largely independent of viral genomic RNA. Taken together, our data strongly support a role of viral genomic RNA in the specific encapsidation of APO3G. Our results also demonstrate that cellular RNAs are not sufficient for the encapsidation of APO3G into HIV-1 particles and for the functional association with viral nucleoprotein complexes. Results Association of APO3G with cellular RNAs Cellular APO3G is present in HMM ribonucleoprotein complexes. Analysis of the RNAs in these complexes revealed the presence of Alu RNAs and small Y RNAs, two of the most prominent non-autonomous mobile genetic elements in human cells [23,42]. We wanted to confirm and extend these observations by further investigating the association of APO3G with other small cellular RNAs such as 7SL RNA, Y RNAs, and U RNAs. Messenger RNAs encoding β-actin, GAPDH, or α-tubulin were included as additional controls for the specificity of APO3G-RNA interactions. HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA-Apo3G-MycHis DNA. Cells were harvested 24 h after transfection, washed with PBS and divided into two fractions: 30% of the transfected cells were used to isolate total cellular RNA as described in Methods; the remaining 70% of the cells were lysed in Triton X-100 lysis buffer. A sample of the lysate (10%) was used as total protein control for the subsequent immunoblot analysis (Fig. (Fig.1A,1A
To rule out non-specific binding of RNAs to the myc-specific antibody in figure figure1B,1B Cellular RNAs are not sufficient to target APO3G into HIV-1 virions Previous studies on murine and avian retroviruses found that these viruses encapsidate a variety of host RNAs [24,25,28-31,33,43]. More recent studies have similarly identified cellular RNAs in HIV-1 particles [28,32]. The experiments described above are both consistent with our previous finding that APO3G has RNA binding properties in vitro [21] and other studies demonstrating association of APO3G with cellular RNAs as well as HIV-1 RNA [19,23]. Furthermore, we and others previously reported that viral genomic RNA enhances the encapsidation of APO3G into HIV-1 virions [16,18]. Contrasting these findings, other reports concluded that Gag is sufficient for the encapsidation of APO3G into VLP [9,11-14,16]. Interestingly, the APO3G-Gag interaction was found to be either RNA independent [13] or to be sensitive to RNase-treatment [14] and several studies concluded that nonspecific RNA was critical for APO3G packaging [9,11]. Thus, the parameters determining APO3G packaging into HIV-1 virions remained unclear and warranted further investigation. In our next experiment, we compared the packaging of APO3G and cellular RNAs into HIV-1 virions or VLP in an attempt to identify a possible correlation between APO3G packaging and encapsidation of cellular RNAs. Four types of particles were analyzed as shown in Fig. Fig.2.2
Particles were produced by transfecting HeLa cells with appropriate plasmid DNAs in the presence of APO3G. Viruses were purified and concentrated as described in Methods. Aliquots were used for immunoblot analysis to determine viral protein content and to verify APO3G packaging (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
Equal numbers of particles, as judged by reverse transcriptase activity, were used for extraction of RNA, which was then used for RT-PCR using a series of primers as shown in figure figure3C3C Packaging of hY RNAs requires the NC zinc finger domains The increased packaging of hY RNAs into particles lacking genomic RNA could indicate a competitive mechanism in which viral genomic RNA competes for a common packaging domain. Since viral genomic RNA is packaged through an interaction with the NC zinc finger domain, we investigated the impact of zinc finger mutations on the packaging of hY RNAs. In addition, we assessed the impact of zinc finger mutations on the packaging of genomic RNA and 7SL RNA as well as APO3G (Fig. (Fig.4).4
For RT-PCR analysis, C-HelpΔVif RNA from figure figure3C3C 7SL RNA does not promote SRP54 encapsidation 7SL RNA (also referred to as SRP RNA) is a component of the signal recognition particle (SRP), which is critical for the targeting of nascent secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (for review see [46]). SRP54 is one of six protein subunits that constitute mammalian SRPs and is responsible for high affinity assembly of 7SL RNA into the SRP complex (reviewed in [47]). Given the fact that 7SL RNA was efficiently packaged into HIV-1 virions, we wanted to test whether intracellular high affinity 7SL RNA-SRP54 interactions would result in the recruitment of SRP54 rather than APO3G into HIV-1 virions. First, we verified the association of 7SL RNA with SRP54 in normal HeLa cells. For that purpose, HeLa cell lysates were adsorbed to SRP54 reactive autoantibodies and immunoprecipitation of SRP54 was confirmed by immunoblotting using an SRP54-specific antibody (Fig. (Fig.5A,5A
Next, the packaging of SRP54 protein into HIV-1 virions was tested. Virus particles were produced as described for figure figure33 Discussion There is general agreement in the literature that APO3G can severely impair replication of HIV-1 and other primate lentiviruses lacking functional Vif proteins. It is also uncontested that the antiviral activity of APO3G – with the notable exception of resting CD4+ T cells [22] – requires the encapsidation of APO3G into nascent virions (for review see [48,49]). However, the mechanism of APO3G encapsidation is not fully understood. In vitro studies demonstrated the ability of APO3G to interact with viral Gag protein and the nucleocapsid region of the viral Gag precursor was identified as the likely APO3G binding site [9,12-14,16]. Consistent with this model, studies on virus-like particles demonstrated efficient packaging of APO3G in the absence of viral genomic RNA [9,11-14,16] although some of these studies proposed that non-specific cellular RNA may contribute to APO3G encapsidation [9,11,14,16]. Our own data confirm the importance of NC for encapsidation as APO3G was not encapsidated into a zinc finger mutant (Fig. (Fig.4).4 The current study was stimulated by recent reports on the presence of cellular 7SL RNA and snRNAs in HIV-1 virions or retroviral particles [28,32,41] as well as the characterization of cellular RNAs associated with intracellular APO3G [19,23]. Our goal was to test the possible contribution of these or other host RNAs towards the packaging of APO3G into HIV-1 particles. Of the four hY RNAs previously identified in APO3G complexes [23], hY3 was clearly identified in APO3G complexes while hY1 and hY4 only weakly interacted with APO3G in our analysis (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B U6 snRNA was previously identified in RSV particles [41]. Interestingly, however, U1, U2, and U4 snRNA, all of which were identified in our HIV preparations, were either absent from RSV particles or only present in trace amounts [41]. While it is possible that RSV and HIV differ in the packaging of cellular RNAs, it is also possible that the greater sensitivity of the RT-PCR approach used in our study versus the northern blot analysis employed in the RSV analysis contributed to the different findings. Of note, 7SL RNA despite being packaged in molar excess relative to viral genomic RNA [28] did not promote the packaging of SRP54 protein (Fig. (Fig.3B)3B Conclusion We have demonstrated that vif-defective HIV-1 particles package a variety of cellular RNAs. Most of the cellular RNAs tested, except hY RNAs, were packaged independent of viral genomic RNA. Packaging of hY RNAs was NC-dependent and inhibited by viral genomic RNA. In all experiments, APO3G packaging correlated well with the presence of viral genomic RNA but not with the presence of any of the cellular RNAs tested. Thus, our data do not support a model in which APO3G is packaged through non-specific or specific interaction with cellular RNAs. In particular, we can rule out that packaging of 7SL RNA is sufficient for the encapsidation of APO3G. Instead, we propose that packaging of APO3G into virus particles is mediated through interaction with viral genomic RNA. Methods Plasmids The vif-defective molecular clone pNL4-3ΔVif [50] was used for the production of vif-defective HIV-1 virus stocks. Plasmid pC-HelpΔVif was used for the production of vif-defective Ψ- virus-like particles (VLP). These particles contain undetectable levels of viral genomic RNA [18]. Plasmid pNL4-3mS.1ΔVif carries mutations in stem-loop 1 of the 5'-untranslated region [51] and was constructed by subcloning the mutated stem-loop 1 region into the vif-defective pNL4-3 vector [18]. NL4-3mS.1ΔVif particles are Ψ+ but do not support the encapsidation of APO3G [18]. A vif-defective variant of DB653 [45] was constructed by transferring the Gag region of DB653 into pNL4-3Vif(-) using standard cloning techniques. The structures of these constructs are schematically shown in figure figure2.2 Tissue culture and transfection HeLa cells, which do not express endogenous APO3G, were propagated in Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). For transfection, HeLa cells were grown in 25 cm2 flasks to about 80% confluency. Cells were transfected using LipofectAMINE PLUS™ (Invitrogen Corp, Carlsbad CA) following the manufacturer's recommendations. A total of 5 μg of plasmid DNA per 25 cm2 flask (5 × 106 cells) was generally used. Cells were harvested 24 h post transfection. Preparation of virus stocks Virus stocks were prepared by transfecting HeLa cells with pNL4-3ΔVif, pC-HelpΔVif, or pNL4-3mS.1ΔVif DNAs in the presence or absence of APO3G expression vector as indicated in the text. Virus-containing supernatants were harvested 24 h after transfection. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation (5 min, 1500 rpm) and clarified supernatants were filtered (0.45 μm) to remove residual cellular contaminants. For immunoblot analysis of viral proteins and RNA extraction, virus-containing supernatants (7 ml) were concentrated by ultracentrifugation through 2 ml of 20% sucrose in PBS as described previously [7]. Antisera APO3G was identified using a polyclonal rabbit serum against a synthetic peptide comprising the 17 C-terminal residues of APO3G. Serum from an HIV-positive patient (APS) was used to detect HIV-1-specific capsid (CA) proteins. Tubulin was identified using an α-tubulin-specific monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis MO). SRP54 protein was detected with a SRP54-specific monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Immunoprecipitation of APO3G was done using a polyclonal antibody raised against the myc tag (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO). A human SRP54-reactive autoimmune serum was used for immunoprecipitation of SRP54 protein (kind gift of Frederick W. Miller, NIEHS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Immunoblotting HeLa cells transfected with APO3G were used to detect cellular APO3G expression and untransfected HeLa cells were used for the detection of endogenous SRP54 protein by immunoblotting with appropriate antibodies. For immunoblot analysis of cellular proteins, whole cell lysates were prepared as follows. Cells were washed once with PBS, suspended in 450 μl/107 cells with X-100 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100). For Western blot analysis 50 μl aliquot was taken and mixed with equal volume of sample buffer (4% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 25 mM Tris-HCL, pH 6.8, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and 0.002% bromphenol blue). Proteins were solubilized by boiling for 5 min at 95°C with occasional vortexing of the samples to shear chromosomal DNA. Residual insoluble material was removed by centrifugation (2 min, 15,000 rpm in an Eppendorf Minifuge). For immunoblot analysis of virus-associated proteins, concentrated viral pellets were suspended in a 1:1 mixture of PBS and sample buffer and boiled. Cell lysates and viral extracts were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and reacted with appropriate antibodies as described in the text. Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Bioscience). Immunoprecipitation analysis HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA-APO3G-MycHis. Cells were harvested at 24 h post transfection cell lysates were prepared as follows: Cells were divided into two unequal fractions (30% and 70%). The larger fraction was used for immunoprecipitation studies and the smaller fraction was used for RNA extraction (see below). For immunoprecipitation, cells were washed once with PBS and lysed in 450 μl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH7.5, 150 mM, NaCl 0.5% and Triton X-100). The cell extracts were clarified by centrifugation (13,000 × g, 3 min) and the supernatant was incubated on a rotating wheel for 1 h at 4°C with protein A-Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis MO) coupled with (IP) or without (Ctrl) anti-myc rabbit polyclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis MO). Immunocomplexes were washed three times with wash buffer (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100 (pH 7.4). Bound proteins were eluted form beads by heating in sample buffer for 5 min at 95°C and analyzed by immunoblotting using antibodies as indicated in the text. For immunoprecipitation of APO3G-RNA complexes, cell extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation by antibody covered beads or control beads as described above and washed three times with RNA-protein binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 25 mM KCl, 7 mM 2-Mercaptoethanol, 5% Glycerol and 0.1% NP-40). Bound RNA was then extracted as described below. RNA extraction Total cellular RNA was extracted from untransfected and transfected HeLa cells using the RNeasy RNA extraction kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. To isolate RNA from immunocomplexes, beads were washed three times with RNA-protein binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 25 mM KCl, 7 mM 2-Mercaptoethanol, 5% Glycerol and 0.1% NP-40). RNA was then extracted using RNeasy RNA extraction kit. For isolation of SRP54-associated RNA, SRP54 was precipitated with SRP54-reactive human autoantibodies derived from a patient with polymyositis ([53]; gift of Frederick W Miller, NIEHS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). RNA was then extracted from the immunocomplexes as before RT-PCR RNA extracted from cells, viruses, or immunocomplexes was treated with RNase-free DNase I (10 units, 30 min, 37°C) prior to the RT-PCR reaction. RNA concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry. RT-PCR was performed using equal amounts of RNA and the one-step RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Primers for the amplification of specific RNAs are listed in table 1. RNA was first reverse transcribed at 50°C for 30 minutes followed by 30 PCR cycles (denaturation at 94°C; 15 sec; annealing at 55°C, 30 sec; and extension at 72°C, 1 min) and one 10-minute extension cycle at 72°C. RT-PCR products were mixed with DNA loading buffer (EDTA 20 mM, TAE 5×, Glycerol 50% and 0.002% Bromphenol Blue dye), electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels, and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. A DNA size marker was run in parallel. Competing interests The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions M.K. conceived the study, was leading the execution of the experiments, and participated in the writing of the manuscript. K.S. coordinated and supervised the study and was involved in the writing of the manuscript. R.G., S.O., E.M., H.T., and S.K. participated in virus production and sample preparation and provided critical comments on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Frederick Miller (NIEHS, NIH) for providing SRP54-reactive human autoimmune serum. We thank Jared Clever and Tristram Parslow for the mS.1 mutant. Plasmid DB653 was a generous gift of Robert Gorelick (AIDS Vaccine Research Program, NCI). Part of this work was supported by a grant from the NIH Intramural AIDS Targeted Antiviral Program to K.S. and by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIAID to K.S. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Feb; 22(2):367-77.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2005]Trends Genet. 2003 Apr; 19(4):207-16.
[Trends Genet. 2003]Cell. 2003 Jul 11; 114(1):21-31.
[Cell. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20; 279(34):35822-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(21):12058-61.
[J Virol. 2004]J Virol. 2006 Jun; 80(12):5992-6002.
[J Virol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 29; 281(39):29105-19.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17; 103(42):15588-93.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]PLoS Pathog. 2007 Feb; 3(2):e15.
[PLoS Pathog. 2007]J Virol. 1981 Aug; 39(2):471-80.
[J Virol. 1981]J Virol. 2007 Jun; 81(12):6623-31.
[J Virol. 2007]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]Virology. 1979 Apr 15; 94(1):146-61.
[Virology. 1979]Virology. 1969 Jan; 37(1):124-31.
[Virology. 1969]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17; 103(42):15588-93.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 29; 281(39):29105-19.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Virol. 2005 Nov; 79(21):13528-37.
[J Virol. 2005]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]J Virol. 2007 Jun; 81(12):6623-31.
[J Virol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17; 103(42):15588-93.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(6):2032-41.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]J Virol. 1981 Aug; 39(2):471-80.
[J Virol. 1981]J Virol. 1991 Jan; 65(1):71-80.
[J Virol. 1991]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]Cell. 1978 Dec; 15(4):1371-81.
[Cell. 1978]Virology. 1979 Apr 15; 94(1):146-61.
[Virology. 1979]J Virol. 1998 Nov; 72(11):8873-83.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 2005 May; 79(9):5870-4.
[J Virol. 2005]J Virol. 2000 Oct; 74(19):8980-8.
[J Virol. 2000]J Virol. 2005 May; 79(9):5870-4.
[J Virol. 2005]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(21):12058-61.
[J Virol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20; 279(34):35822-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Virology. 2004 Oct 25; 328(2):163-8.
[Virology. 2004]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(21):11841-52.
[J Virol. 2004]Annu Rev Biochem. 2001; 70():755-75.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 2001]Annu Rev Biochem. 2004; 73():539-57.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 2004]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]AIDS Rev. 2006 Jul-Sep; 8(3):148-57.
[AIDS Rev. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 31; 281(13):8309-12.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(21):12058-61.
[J Virol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 13; 279(33):34083-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]J Virol. 2007 Jun; 81(12):6623-31.
[J Virol. 2007]RNA. 2004 Feb; 10(2):299-307.
[RNA. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 29; 281(39):29105-19.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17; 103(42):15588-93.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]RNA. 2004 Feb; 10(2):299-307.
[RNA. 2004]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]J Virol. 1996 Jan; 70(1):494-507.
[J Virol. 1996]J Virol. 2005 May; 79(9):5870-4.
[J Virol. 2005]J Virol. 1997 May; 71(5):3407-14.
[J Virol. 1997]J Virol. 2000 Oct; 74(19):8980-8.
[J Virol. 2000]J Virol. 2003 Nov; 77(21):11398-407.
[J Virol. 2003]J Virol. 2003 Nov; 77(21):11398-407.
[J Virol. 2003]Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8(2):R39.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17; 103(42):15588-93.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]RNA. 2006 Apr; 12(4):542-6.
[RNA. 2006]RNA. 2004 Feb; 10(2):299-307.
[RNA. 2004]Oncology. 2003; 64(4):416-22.
[Oncology. 2003]