![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society of Hematology Immunobiology TCRζdimlymphocytes define populations of circulating effector cells that migrate to inflamed tissues 1Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division and 2Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom Corresponding author.Received December 20, 2006; Accepted January 16, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The T-cell receptor ζ (TCRζ) chain is a master sensor and regulator of lymphocyte responses. Loss of TCRζ expression has been documented in infectious, inflammatory, and malignant diseases, suggesting that it may serve to limit T-cell reactivity and effector responses at sites of tissue damage. These observations prompted us to explore the relationship between TCRζ expression and effector function in T cells. We report here that TCRζdim lymphocytes are enriched for antigen-experienced cells refractory to TCR-induced proliferation. Compared to their TCRζbright counterparts, TCRζdim cells share characteristics of differentiated effector T cells but use accessory pathways for transducing signals for inflammatory cytokine gene expression and cell contact-dependent pathways to activate monocytes. TCRζdim T cells accumulate in inflamed tissues in vivo and have intrinsic migratory activity in vitro. Whilst blocking leukocyte trafficking with anti-TNF therapy in vivo is associated with the accumulation of TCRζdim T cells in peripheral blood, this T-cell subset retains the capacity to migrate in vitro. Taken together, the functional properties of TCRζdim T cells make them promising cellular targets for the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease. Introduction The acquisition of immune responsiveness is mediated through the assembly, expression, and function of antigen receptors at the cell surface.1 In T lymphocytes, the antigen T-cell receptor (TCR) is a multiple subunit complex comprising clonotypic, disulfide-linked α and β antigen recognition chains devoid of signaling motifs associated with the invariant chain subunits CD3γ, δ, and ϵ, and TCRζ.2 These invariant chains assemble in the mature TCR/CD3 complex as noncovalently linked CD3γϵ and CD3δϵ heterodimers and disulfide-linked TCRζ–ζ homodimers and transmit signals inside the cell following TCR ligation-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of immune receptor tyrosine-based activation motifs contained within their extended intracytoplasmic tails.3–5 These phosphotyrosine motifs form docking sites for Syk family tyrosine kinases, such as ζ-associated protein of 70 kDa (ZAP-70), which in turn couple the antigen receptor complex to transmembrane adaptor proteins and downstream signaling pathways.6 The TCRζ subunit differs in its genetic organization, chromosomal localization, and domain structure from the CD3γ, δ, and ϵ invariant chains. Thus, in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells the 16-kDa TCRζ chain subserves a unique role in TCR/CD3 complex assembly by associating with newly synthesized hexameric αβγϵδϵ complexes resulting in the transport and expression of mature αβγϵδϵζ2 complexes to the cell surface.7 Furthermore, metabolic labeling and pulse chase experiments have demonstrated that de novo synthesis of TCRζ is rate-limiting, thereby regulating the amount of TCR/CD3 complex expressed at the cell surface.8,9 In NK cells, the TCRζ chain may form homodimers or heterodimers with the FcϵR common γ chain signaling subunit, which in turn may form signaling complexes with several activating receptors, including NK cell protein 46 (NKp46), NKp30, and the low-affinity IgG receptor FcγRIII (CD16).10,11 In light of these crucial functions the TCRζ chain could be viewed as a master regulator and sensor of innate as well as adaptive immune responses. It follows from this that aberrations in its expression or function should have profound effects on immune function. The events leading to the down-regulation of TCR/CD3 complex expression on serial ligation by peptide/MHC complexes are well documented.12 Less well understood are the molecular mechanisms for the sustained down-regulation of TCRζ observed in chronic bacterial, HIV, and mycobacterial infections, autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, and in solid tumor and hematologic malignancies (reviewed by Baniyash13). That this phenomenon is associated with so many diverse pathologies has raised the possibility that down-regulation of TCRζ may serve to attenuate T-cell activation at sites of tissue damage, thereby limiting the effects of unbridled T-cell reactivity and pathologic effector responses.14,15 Whilst this model is entirely consistent with a central role for antigen in driving autoimmune inflammatory activity, it implies that chronically activated T cells rendered hyporesponsive to TCR engagement through loss of TCRζ expression should play a less prominent role in the established phase of disease.13,14 To gain further insight into the immunobiology of T cells expressing low levels of TCRζ (hereafter, TCRζdim), we explored the relationship between loss of TCRζ expression and T-cell function. Our results shed light on the nature of persistent effector responses of T cells that become refractory to antigenic restimulation during the evolution of immune responses. They also have implications for cell-based therapies aimed at achieving long-term remission in patients with chronic inflammatory disease. Patients, materials, and methods Healthy donors and patients Laboratory staff members, aged 22 to 45 years of age, were enrolled as healthy donors. All patients were recruited from the Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust (London, United Kingdom). CMV reactive lymphocytes were obtained from HLA-B*0702+ patients with chronic myeloid leukemia selected by CMV seropositivity. Single donor plateletpheresis residues were obtained from the North London Blood Transfusion Service (Colindale, United Kingdom). Patients with severe, active seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) meeting the American College of Rheumatology revised classification criteria for RA,16 and requiring anti-TNF therapy, were recruited to the study. Prior to anti-TNF therapy, all patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in addition to methotrexate and sulfasalazine, with or without hydroxychloroquine and low-dose prednisolone. Peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) lymphocytes were obtained from patients with RA, psoriatic arthritis, or reactive arthritis who attended the clinic with a flare of disease requiring therapeutic arthrocentesis. Synovial mononuclear cell suspensions were prepared from RA synovial tissue obtained at joint replacement surgery as described.17 Written, informed consent was obtained from all participating donors and patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all protocols were approved by the Riverside Research Ethics Committee, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust. Human lymphocytes PB lymphocytes (PBLs) from heparinized peripheral venous blood (or mononuclear cells from SF) were obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation (specific density 1.077 g/mL; Nycomed Pharma, Oslo, Norway) and used immediately for flow cytometric analysis. Where relevant, additional aliquots were prepared and frozen until required. PB monocytes and T cells were purified by elutriation (JE6; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) in 1% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), as described,17 and purity assessed by flow cytometry. Single-cell suspensions of synovial membrane mononuclear cells were prepared as described.17 Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μM 2-ME, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 25 mM HEPES (complete medium). Antibodies and recombinant cytokines The following antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences PharMingen (San Diego, CA): anti–CD8-APC, anti–CD28-FITC, anti–CD45RA-APC, anti–TNFα-FITC, anti–IFNγ-FITC, and anti–IL-10–APC. Anti–CD45RO-FITC was obtained from Serotec (Oxford, United Kingdom), mouse IgG1-FITC and anti–CD3-FITC from Sigma (St Louis, MO), mouse IgG1-PE and anti–TCRζ-PE (TIA2, which recognizes a cytoplasmic domain epitope) from Immunotech (Coulter, Hialeah, FL), and mouse IgG–PerCP, anti–CD3-PerCP, anti–CD4-PerCP, anti–CD8-PerCP, anti–CD16-FITC, and anti–CD56-FITC from Becton Dickinson (San Jose, CA). Anti–TCRζ-FITC (clone 6B10.2, which recognizes a transmembrane epitope of TCRζ) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The anti-CD3ϵ antibody used for stimulation (clone OKT3) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Human recombinant TNF-α and IL-2 were generous gifts of Prof W. Stec (Centre of Molecular Studies, Lodz, Poland) and Dr P. Lomedico (Hoffman-La Roche, Nutley, NJ), respectively. All other cytokines were purchased from PeproTech EC (London, United Kingdom) or R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany). Flow cytometry Cells were stained by standard methods and analyzed using an LSR BD FACScan analyzer and CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). For analysis of TCRζ and intracellular cytokine expression, cells were fixed with 2% formaldehyde and permeabilized in buffer containing 10 μg/mL saponin, according to established protocols.18 The efficiency of permeabilization was determined by uptake of trypan blue (always > 99%). T-cell stimulation and effector responses For proliferation, unfractionated PBLs were labeled with 5 μM CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) prior to stimulation in complete medium with plate bound OKT3 (2 μg/mL) with or without soluble anti-CD28 (2 μg/mL). Cells were harvested at the indicated times, stained with specific antibodies to TCRζ (TIA2-PE), together with anti-CD3, anti-CD4, or anti-CD8 conjugated to PerCP and analyzed by flow cytometry. CMV-reactive PBLs were stimulated with specific pp65 CMV peptide (amino acid sequence: TPRVTGGGAM, from Proimmune, Oxford, United Kingdom) in the presence of 50 U/mL IL-2 and 10 ng/mL IL-7 for up to 8 days prior to staining with anti-TCRζ (6B10.2-FITC), HLA-B7-tetramer-PE (Proimmune), and anti–CD8-APC and analysis by flow cytometry. Cytokine-activated T cells were generated from elutriated T cells over 8 days using IL-2 (25 ng/mL), TNF-α (25 ng/mL), and IL-6 (100 ng/mL) as described.17 Cytokine expression was determined by staining fixed and permeabilized PBL with directly conjugated anticytokine antibodies (all from BD Biosciences PharMingen), after stimulation for 6 hours at 37°C with 20 ng/mL phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and 200 ng/mL ionomycin (both from Sigma). Golgistop (containing monensin, from BD Biosciences PharMingen) was added for the last hour of stimulation. Specificity of staining was confirmed using isotype-specific control antibodies and by ligand-blocking experiments using the corresponding recombinant cytokine. For CD28 stimulation of TCRζdim cells, T cells were cocultured with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with CD80 or CD86 (generously provided by Dr D. Sansom, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom) for 24 hours, and supernatants harvested and assayed for IFN-γ or IL-10 expression by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA; BD Biosciences PharMingen). Cell contact-dependent activation of monocytes by TCRζbright or TCRζdim T cells fixed in PBS containing 0.05% glutaraldehyde and neutralized with an equal volume of buffer containing 0.2 M glycine was performed as described.17 Stimulation of monocytes with LPS (10 ng/mL) in the absence of T cells was used as a positive control. Culture supernatants were harvested after 24 hours and assayed for TNF-α levels by ELISA (BD PharMingen). Transendothelial migration of PBLs or elutriated T cells 24 hours after plating over monolayers of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) previously stimulated with 10 ng/mL TNF-α for 48 hours was performed essentially as described.19 Numbers of migrating TCRζbright or TCRζdim T cells were determined by flow cytometry. Assessment of clinical response Patients with active RA requiring anti-TNF treatment as part of their standard care were identified according to national guidelines. All patients were treated with intravenous infusions of infliximab (3 mg/kg) at week 0, 2, 6, and then 8 weekly thereafter, while continuing existing disease-modifying drug therapy. At baseline and at the indicated times disease activity and response to therapy were determined using the disease activity score (DAS), which includes the 28 joint count (DAS28).20 At baseline, all patients had DAS28 scores of more than 5.1. Good, moderate, and poor responses were defined according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) DAS response criteria at 14 and 30 weeks.21 PBLs were obtained at the indicated times after starting therapy and frozen prior to analysis. Statistical analysis Differences in phenotype between TCRζbright and TCRζdim subsets were determined by pair-wise analyses using the Wilcoxon signed rank test or Student t test, according to sample distribution. Correlations between changes in TCRζ expression and disease activity were determined by linear regression analysis. The limit for statistical significance was set at .05. Results To study TCRζ expression at the single-cell level in mixed populations of PBLs from healthy donors we adapted quantitative flow cytometric assays first developed to study deficient ζ-chain expression in T cells from patients with cancer.22 The TCRζ chain has a short 9 amino acid extracellular domain, so we used mouse monoclonal antibodies (clones TIA-2 or 6B10) that detect cytoplasmic domain epitopes of the ζ chain in T cells after fixing and permeabilization. Both antibodies recognize phosphorylated as well as unphosphorylated forms of the TCRζ chain, implying that any loss of signal is not due to activation-induced phosphorylation of the ζ-chain polypeptide (data not shown). As expected, staining of PBLs from healthy donors defined distinct lymphocyte subsets, including populations of CD3+TCRζ+ cells, CD3−TCRζ+ cells, and a double-negative population of monocytes and B cells that do not express TCRζ (Figure 1
The relationship between antigen engagement and reduced levels of TCRζ reported previously suggested that TCRζ expression should discriminate between subsets of naïve and memory T-cell subsets defined by conventional cell surface markers. To this end, we stained healthy donor PBLs with antibodies specific for CD45RA or CD45RO to define subsets of naïve and memory T cells, respectively, and then compared the expression of these markers on TCRζbright and TCRζdim cell subsets. Histogram plots from a representative experiment, shown in Figure 1 To examine the functional consequences of TCRζ expression on TCR responsiveness, we stained fresh PBLs from healthy donors with carboxy-fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and tracked the proliferative capacity of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets in response to stimulation with OKT3, or OKT3 and anti-CD28 in combination. At the indicated times cells were harvested, stained for TCRζ expression, and analyzed by CFSE dye dilution. Although little proliferation was detected within the first few days of TCR stimulation, dividing T cells could be detected at subsequent time points, and these were uniformly TCRζbright (Figure 2
It followed from this that after TCR stimulation in vitro, antigen-reactive T cells should reside in the TCRζdim compartment. To test this directly, we analyzed fresh PBLs from HLA-B*0702+ CMV-reactive donors after stimulation with specific CMV peptide and tracked antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with fluorescent HLA-B7/p65 MHC-peptide tetramers. In a representative experiment, the proportion of tetramer-positive T cells increased from less than 3% prior to stimulation to almost 10% after 8 days of culture (Figure 2 A characteristic feature of effector T cells is their capacity to produce cytokines. Current paradigms of T-cell differentiation suggest that T cells undergo a complex series of epigenetic events to acquire stable transcriptional competence for cytokine gene expression.23 These events depend on signals integrated from both the antigen T-cell receptor and cytokine receptors that induce the expression and activation of lineage-specific transcription factors.24 We therefore explored whether TCRζdim T cells that had already engaged antigen in vivo were competent for cytokine gene expression when compared to TCRζbright cells from the same donor. To test this, fresh PBLs were stimulated in vitro for 6 hours with phorbol ester and calcium ionophore. This stimulus, in contrast to anti-TCR antibodies, allowed us to assess competence for cytokine gene expression by activating T cells through pathways independent of TCRζ expression. Monensin was added to cultures for the last hour of stimulation prior to harvesting and staining using specific antibodies for CD3ϵ and TCRζ in combination with the indicated anticytokine antibody. Representative histogram plots are shown for each cytokine (Figure 3
The results described thus far indicated that circulating TCRζdim T cells were enriched for cells that had previously engaged antigen and that were primed for cytokine production. However, the proliferative responses of T cells to TCR engagement shown in Figure 2
To test whether TCRζdim T cells could reciprocally activate monocytes, TCRζbright or TCRζdim T cells were fixed prior to incubation with elutriated monocytes and supernatants harvested 24 hours later and assayed for monocyte-derived TNF-α production. Monocytes or T cells alone produced little or no TNF-α, whereas LPS stimulation induced abundant TNF-α (Figure 4 This effector phenotype, being reminiscent of RA synovial T cells,17 prompted us to compare expression of TCRζ in paired PB and SF T cells from patients with an acute flare of inflammatory arthritis who attended a clinic. TCRζ expression profiles were notable in several respects. First, a significant proportion of SF T cells had negligible levels of TCRζ expression, equivalent to that detected in the CD3ϵ−TCRζ− double-negative cell population, and yet surface expression of CD3ϵ was spared (Figure 5
We reasoned that accumulation and persistence of PB TCRζdim effector T cells in anti-TNF responders might explain why disease flares occur on withdrawing anti-TNF therapy, after which TCRζdim T cells would migrate back to the synovial joint compartment and reinitiate a local inflammatory response. Ethics precluded further investigation in patients, and so we opted to study transendothelial migration of TCRζdim T-cell subsets in vitro. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that by 24 hours about 20% to 25% of PBLs from healthy donors migrate across TNF-stimulated endothelial monolayers cultured in the Transwell. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that cells migrating to the lower chamber expressed lower levels TCRζ. This was true for both T-cell and NK cell subsets (Figure 6
Finally, we asked whether TCRζdim cells accumulating in PB retain the capacity to migrate despite anti-TNF therapy. To this end, the migratory competence of PB cells obtained from RA patients with active disease at baseline was compared with cells acquired after 14 weeks of anti-TNF treatment. Although the results demonstrated a trend toward reduced migration of CD8+TCRζdim T cells and a significant reduction in migration of the CD3−TCRζ+ NK cell subsets, the capacity of CD3+ and CD4+TCRζdim T-cell subsets to migrate across activated endothelium in vitro was not influenced by anti-TNF treatment in vivo (Figure 7
Discussion It seems likely that T cells expressing low levels of TCRζ define polyclonal populations of antigen-experienced T cells in vivo based on their cell surface phenotype, tetramer staining, cytokine expression, proliferative responses, and migratory competence. Even though their accumulation in inflamed tissues appears consistent with this, we cannot yet account for the heterogeneity of this TCRζdim population. This subset will include populations of T cells that have very recently engaged antigen, perhaps explaining their refractoriness to TCR restimulation, but also T cells in which loss of TCRζ expression persists over time. Our data seem consistent with this because during an acute inflammatory response TCRζdim cells are depleted from the PB compartment and enriched in inflamed tissue; TNF blockade reverses this. Furthermore, transendothelial migration experiments demonstrated an enhanced propensity for circulating TCRζdim T cells to migrate when compared to their TCRζbright counterparts, implying that migration is associated with, and perhaps even facilitated by, loss of TCRζ expression in peripheral lymphoid organs. We suggest that on migration to tissues in vivo this subset would be exposed to an inflammatory milieu where hypoxia, reactive oxygen intermediates, depletion of essential nutrients, inflammatory cytokines, and activated cells of myeloid lineage each contribute to chronic down-regulation of TCRζ expression.25,30–33 Therein, aberrant TCR signals and their functional sequelae may be perpetuated. We still do not fully understand which extracellular cues sustain the effector function of TCRζdim T cells and how these apparently dysfunctional cells contribute actively to pathogenic processes, besides the apparent imbalance of TCR-dependent arrest of cell motility and competing chemokinetic “go” signals promoting adhesion and migration. One possibility is that TCRζ-deficient TCR/CD3 complexes are capable of transmitting signals to induce and sustain inflammatory cytokine gene expression through compensatory up-regulation of the FcϵRIγ signaling subunit, as first described in intraepithelial lymphocytes of TCRζ-deficient mice.34,35 Indeed, T cells from TCRζ-deficient mice are fully competent to differentiate into IFN-γ–producing Th1 cells,36 a finding consistent with the enrichment for IFN-γ and TNF-α expression in human TCRζdim T cells (Figure 3 A direct link between the loss of integrity of signaling from the TCR/CD3 complex and the generation of a repertoire of arthritogenic T cells has recently been reported in SKG mice.39 A spontaneous mutation in ZAP-70, which uncouples membrane proximal TCR signal transduction, impairs thymic selection leading to a peripheral repertoire of autoreactive T cells, which, among other tissues, targets synovial joints manifesting as a symmetrical and destructive polyarthritis.39 There are striking similarities between CD4+ T cells from SKG mice and TCRζdim T cells, not least of which being their profound hyporesponsiveness to TCR engagement, skewed T-helper cell differentiation favoring expression of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and (in our hands) IL-17, in combination with a robust capacity to activate monocytes. These T-cell–monocyte interactions likely play a major role in promoting the chronic, excessive cytokine drive characteristic of both autoimmune arthritis in SKG mice and RA.17,40–42 Given the strong predilection to migrate to inflammatory tissues coupled with their effector phenotype, TCRζdim T cells should now be considered a valid cellular target for treating a wide range of chronic inflammatory diseases. Acknowledgments This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust, the Arthritis Research Campaign, and the British Heart Foundation. The authors gratefully acknowledge Eugenio Macchiarulo for help with the tetramer staining and Jane Douglas for collecting clinical data. Footnotes The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. Authorship Contribution: Z.Z., C.L.G., A.-C.V., A.F., S.O., P.I. and A.R. performed research; P.A., A.V., and C. McClinton collected data; C. Monaco, F.M.-B., F.D., T.J.V., and F.M.B analyzed data; and Z.Z., C.L.G., and A.P.C. designed the research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Z.Z. and C.L.G. contributed equally to this study. Correspondence: Andrew P. Cope, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, 1, Aspenlea Rd, Hammersmith, London W6 8LH, United Kingdom; e-mail: andrew.cope/at/imperial.ac.uk. References 1. Germain RN, Stefanova I. The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:467–522. [PubMed] 2. Klausner RD, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Bonifacino JS. The T cell antigen receptor: insights into organelle biology. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:403–431. [PubMed] 3. Cosson P, Lankford SP, Bonifacino JS, Klausner RD. Membrane protein association by potential intramembrane charge pairs. Nature. 1991;351:414–416. [PubMed] 4. Irving BA, Weiss A. The cytoplasmic domain of the T cell receptor zeta chain is sufficient to couple to receptor-associated signal transduction pathways. Cell. 1991;64:891–901. [PubMed] 5. Letourneur F, Klausner RD. Activation of T cells by a tyrosine kinase activation domain in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 epsilon. Science. 1992;255:79–82. [PubMed] 6. Samelson LE. Signal transduction mediated by the T cell antigen receptor: the role of adapter proteins. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:371–394. [PubMed] 7. Manolios N, Letourneur F, Bonifacino JS, Klausner RD. Pairwise, cooperative and inhibitory interactions describe the assembly and probable structure of the T-cell antigen receptor. EMBO J. 1991;10:1643–1651. [PubMed] 8. Minami Y, Weissman AM, Samelson LE, Klausner RD. Building a multichain receptor: synthesis, degradation, and assembly of the T-cell antigen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:2688–2692. [PubMed] 9. Sussman JJ, Bonifacino JS, Lippincott-Schwartz J, et al. Failure to synthesize the T cell CD3-zeta chain: structure and function of a partial T cell receptor complex. Cell. 1988;52:85–95. [PubMed] 10. Lanier LL, Yu G, Phillips JH. Co-association of CD3 zeta with a receptor (CD16) for IgG Fc on human natural killer cells. Nature. 1989;342:803–805. [PubMed] 11. Moretta A, Bottino C, Vitale M, et al. Activating receptors and coreceptors involved in human natural killer cell-mediated cytolysis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:197–223. [PubMed] 12. Valitutti S, Muller S, Cella M, Padovan E, Lanzavecchia A. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature. 1995;375:148–151. [PubMed] 13. Baniyash M. TCR zeta-chain downregulation: curtailing an excessive inflammatory immune response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:675–687. [PubMed] 14. Cope AP. Studies of T-cell activation in chronic inflammation. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(suppl 3):S197–211. [PubMed] 15. Bronstein-Sitton N, Cohen-Daniel L, Vaknin I, et al. Sustained exposure to bacterial antigen induces interferon-gamma-dependent T cell receptor zeta down-regulation and impaired T cell function. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:957–964. [PubMed] 16. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315–324. [PubMed] 17. Brennan FM, Hayes AL, Ciesielski CJ, Green P, Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Evidence that rheumatoid arthritis synovial T cells are similar to cytokine-activated T cells: involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and nuclear factor kappaB pathways in tumor necrosis factor alpha production in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:31–41. [PubMed] 18. Whiteside TL. Down-regulation of zeta-chain expression in T cells: a biomarker of prognosis in cancer? Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004;53:865–878. [PubMed] 19. Berg LP, James MJ, Alvarez-Iglesias M, Glennie S, Lechler RI, Marelli-Berg FM. Functional consequences of noncognate interactions between CD4+ memory T lymphocytes and the endothelium. J Immunol. 2002;168:3227–3234. [PubMed] 20. Prevoo MLL, van't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LBA, van Riel PLCM. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:44–48. [PubMed] 21. van Gestel AM, Prevoo MLL, van't Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LBA, van Riel PLCM. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:34–40. [PubMed] 22. Nakagomi H, Petersson M, Magnusson I, et al. Decreased expression of the signal-transducing zeta chains in tumor-infiltrating T-cells and NK cells of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1993;53:5610–5612. [PubMed] 23. Ansel KM, Lee DU, Rao A. An epigenetic view of helper T cell differentiation. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:616–623. [PubMed] 24. Murphy KM, Ouyang W, Farrar JD, et al. Signaling and transcription in T helper development. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:451–494. [PubMed] 25. Isomäki P, Panesar M, Annenkov A, et al. Prolonged exposure of T cells to TNF down-regulates TCR zeta and expression of the TCR/CD3 complex at the cell surface. J Immunol. 2001;166:5495–5507. [PubMed] 26. Unutmaz D, Pileri P, Abrignani S. Antigen-independent activation of naive and memory resting T cells by a cytokine combination. J Exp Med. 1994;180:1159–1164. [PubMed] 27. Paleolog EM, Hunt M, Elliott MJ, Feldmann M, Maini RN, Woody JN. Deactivation of vascular endothelium by monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1082–1091. [PubMed] 28. Tak PP, Taylor PC, Breedveld FC, et al. Decrease in cellularity and expression of adhesion molecules by anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1077–1081. [PubMed] 29. Szekanecz Z, Kim J, Koch AE. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunol. 2003;15:15–21. [PubMed] 30. Maurice MM, Nakamura H, van der Voort EA, et al. Evidence for the role of an altered redox state in hyporesponsiveness of synovial T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol. 1997;158:1458–1465. [PubMed] 31. Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, DeSalvo J, et al. L-arginine consumption by macrophages modulates the expression of CD3 zeta chain in T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2003;171:1232–1239. [PubMed] 32. Fallarino F, Grohmann U, You S, et al. The combined effects of tryptophan starvation and tryptophan catabolites down-regulate T cell receptor zeta-chain and induce a regulatory phenotype in naive T cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:6752–6761. [PubMed] 33. Ezernitchi AV, Vaknin I, Cohen-Daniel L, et al. TCR zeta down-regulation under chronic inflammation is mediated by myeloid suppressor cells differentially distributed between various lymphatic organs. J Immunol. 2006;177:4763–4772. [PubMed] 34. Liu CP, Ueda R, She J, et al. Abnormal T cell development in CD3-zeta−/− mutant mice and identification of a novel T cell population in the intestine. EMBO J. 1993;12:4863–4875. [PubMed] 35. Malissen M, Gillet A, Rocha B, et al. T cell development in mice lacking the CD3-zeta/eta gene. EMBO J. 1993;12:4347–4355. [PubMed] 36. Krymskaya L, Lee WH, Zhong L, Liu CP. Polarized development of memory cell-like IFN-gamma-producing cells in the absence of TCR zeta-chain. J Immunol. 2005;174:1188–1195. [PubMed] 37. Herold KC, Burton JB, Francois F, Poumian-Ruiz E, Glandt M, Bluestone JA. Activation of human T cells by FcR nonbinding anti-CD3 mAb, hOKT3gamma1(Ala-Ala). J Clin Invest. 2003;111:409–418. [PubMed] 38. Combadiere B, Freedman M, Chen L, Shores EW, Love P, Lenardo MJ. Qualitative and quantitative contributions of the T cell receptor zeta chain to mature T cell apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1996;183:2109–2117. [PubMed] 39. Sakaguchi N, Takahashi T, Hata H, et al. Altered thymic T-cell selection due to a mutation of the ZAP-70 gene causes autoimmune arthritis in mice. Nature. 2003;426:454–460. [PubMed] 40. Hata H, Sakaguchi N, Yoshitomi H, et al. Distinct contribution of IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-1, and IL-10 to T cell-mediated spontaneous autoimmune arthritis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:582–588. [PubMed] 41. Sebbag M, Parry SL, Brennan FM, Feldmann M. Cytokine stimulation of T lymphocytes regulates their capacity to induce monocyte production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, but not interleukin-10: possible relevance to pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:624–632. [PubMed] 42. Burger D, Dayer JM. The role of human T-lymphocyte-monocyte contact in inflammation and tissue destruction. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(Suppl 3):S169–176. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Annu Rev Immunol. 1999; 17():467-522.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1999]Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990; 6():403-31.
[Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990]Nature. 1991 May 30; 351(6325):414-6.
[Nature. 1991]Cell. 1991 Mar 8; 64(5):891-901.
[Cell. 1991]Science. 1992 Jan 3; 255(5040):79-82.
[Science. 1992]EMBO J. 1991 Jul; 10(7):1643-51.
[EMBO J. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May; 84(9):2688-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987]Cell. 1988 Jan 15; 52(1):85-95.
[Cell. 1988]Nature. 1989 Dec 14; 342(6251):803-5.
[Nature. 1989]Annu Rev Immunol. 2001; 19():197-223.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2001]Nature. 1995 May 11; 375(6527):148-51.
[Nature. 1995]Nat Rev Immunol. 2004 Sep; 4(9):675-87.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2004]Arthritis Res. 2002; 4 Suppl 3():S197-211.
[Arthritis Res. 2002]Nat Immunol. 2003 Oct; 4(10):957-64.
[Nat Immunol. 2003]Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar; 31(3):315-24.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1988]Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan; 46(1):31-41.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2002]Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan; 46(1):31-41.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2002]Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004 Oct; 53(10):865-78.
[Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004]Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan; 46(1):31-41.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2002]J Immunol. 2002 Apr 1; 168(7):3227-34.
[J Immunol. 2002]Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan; 38(1):44-8.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1995]Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jan; 39(1):34-40.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1996]Cancer Res. 1993 Dec 1; 53(23):5610-2.
[Cancer Res. 1993]Nature. 1989 Dec 14; 342(6251):803-5.
[Nature. 1989]Nat Immunol. 2003 Jul; 4(7):616-23.
[Nat Immunol. 2003]Annu Rev Immunol. 2000; 18():451-94.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2000]J Immunol. 2001 May 1; 166(9):5495-507.
[J Immunol. 2001]Cancer Res. 1993 Dec 1; 53(23):5610-2.
[Cancer Res. 1993]J Exp Med. 1994 Sep 1; 180(3):1159-64.
[J Exp Med. 1994]Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan; 46(1):31-41.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2002]Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jul; 39(7):1082-91.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1996]Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jul; 39(7):1077-81.
[Arthritis Rheum. 1996]Semin Immunol. 2003 Feb; 15(1):15-21.
[Semin Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2001 May 1; 166(9):5495-507.
[J Immunol. 2001]J Immunol. 1997 Feb 1; 158(3):1458-65.
[J Immunol. 1997]J Immunol. 2003 Aug 1; 171(3):1232-9.
[J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2006 Jun 1; 176(11):6752-61.
[J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2006 Oct 1; 177(7):4763-72.
[J Immunol. 2006]EMBO J. 1993 Dec; 12(12):4863-75.
[EMBO J. 1993]EMBO J. 1993 Nov; 12(11):4347-55.
[EMBO J. 1993]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1188-95.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Clin Invest. 2003 Feb; 111(3):409-18.
[J Clin Invest. 2003]J Exp Med. 1996 May 1; 183(5):2109-17.
[J Exp Med. 1996]Nature. 2003 Nov 27; 426(6965):454-60.
[Nature. 2003]Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan; 46(1):31-41.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2002]J Clin Invest. 2004 Aug; 114(4):582-8.
[J Clin Invest. 2004]Eur J Immunol. 1997 Mar; 27(3):624-32.
[Eur J Immunol. 1997]Arthritis Res. 2002; 4 Suppl 3():S169-76.
[Arthritis Res. 2002]