![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Cell Biology The Conserved Spc7 Protein Is Required for Spindle Integrity and Links Kinetochore Complexes in Fission Yeast ![]() Lehrstuhl für Funktionelle Genomforschung der Mikroorganismen, Heinrich-Heine Universität, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany Ted Salmon, Monitoring Editor Corresponding author.Address correspondence to: Ursula Fleig (Email: fleigu/at/uni-duesseldorf.de). * These authors contributed equally to this work. Received August 22, 2006; Revised March 29, 2007; Accepted April 11, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Spc7, a member of the conserved Spc105/KNL-1 family of kinetochore proteins, was identified as an interaction partner of the EB1 homologue Mal3. Spc7 associates with the central centromere region of the chromosome but does not affect transcriptional silencing. Here, we show that Spc7 is required for the integrity of the spindle as well as for targeting of MIND but not of Ndc80 complex components to the kinetochore. Spindle defects in spc7 mutants were severe ranging from the inability to form a bipolar spindle in early mitosis to broken spindles in midanaphase B. spc7 mutant phenotypes were partially rescued by extra α-tubulin or extra Mal2. Thus, Spc7 interacts genetically with the Mal2-containing Sim4 complex. INTRODUCTION The precise segregation of chromosomes is a complex process that requires the coordinated interaction between spindle and kinetochores. Kinetochores are macromolecular structures that assemble on centromeric DNA and fulfill multiple functions: they mediate the bipolar attachment of sister chromatids to spindle microtubules, maintain this attachment during dynamic microtubule behavior, and generate the spindle checkpoint signaling required for anaphase onset. These functions are essentially conserved although the composition and morphology of kinetochores can differ greatly among various organisms. In particular, the centromeric DNA requirements vary dramatically from the simple 125-base pair (bp) “point” centromeres of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with the three CDEI-III protein-binding motifs to the “regional” centromeres that are more complex, carry repetitive sequences, and can encompass millions of base pairs. Such centromeres exist in plants, metazoans, and fungi such as the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (reviewed in Pidoux and Allshire, 2000 , 2004 ; Cleveland et al., 2003 ). The centromere DNA of S. pombe is 40–100 kb in size and is composed of a central core region (cnt) that is flanked by inverted repeat elements (imr). These elements are surrounded by outer repeat elements (otr; reviewed in Clarke, 1998 ). The heterochromatic outer repeats are needed for sister centromere cohesion and might help in the orientation of the multiple kinetochore microtubule attachment sites (reviewed in Pidoux and Allshire, 2004 ), whereas the central region acts as a platform for the association of kinetochore complexes required for microtubule–kinetochore interaction (Saitoh et al., 1997 ; Pidoux et al., 2003 ; Hayashi et al., 2004 ; Kerres et al., 2004 ).The simplest and best studied kinetochore, that of S. cerevisiae, contains more than 60 proteins, whereas mammalian kinetochores are predicted to contain ≥100 protein components (McAinsh et al., 2003 ; Fukagawa, 2004 ). These proteins, which exist in subcomplexes, can be classed as regulatory or structural components. The latter group of proteins are required as a connecting bridge between the centromeric DNA and the microtubules of the spindle. Interestingly, S. cerevisiae kinetochore subcomplexes that link centromere DNA-binding proteins to microtubule binding proteins have been conserved in evolution (Meraldi et al., 2006 ). Kinetochore components found in “point” and “regional” centromeres include the COMA complex member Mcm21p, the Ndc80, and MIND complexes and the Spc105p protein, implying the central importance of these components in kinetochore function (Ortiz et al., 1999 ; Wigge and Kilmartin, 2001 ; Euskirchen, 2002 ; De Wulf et al., 2003 ; Nekrasov et al., 2003 ; Westermann et al., 2003 ; Meraldi et al., 2006 ). In S. cerevisiae Ndc80, COMA and MIND complexes share a function in kinetochore capture by the side of spindle microtubules (Tanaka et al., 2005 ).In S. pombe these conserved proteins are constitutive kinetochore components and exist in two biochemically separable complexes: the Mcm21p ortholog Mal2 is part of the 13 component Sim4 complex, whereas the four-component MIND subcomplex, the four-member Ndc80 complex, and the Spc105p ortholog Spc7 make up the Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 kinetochore complex (Obuse et al., 2004 ; Liu et al., 2005 ). The essential Mal2 protein associates with the central centromere region and is required for the transcriptional silencing and the specialized chromatin structure of this region (Jin et al., 2002 ). Mutations in mal2+ and other components of the Sim4 complex give rise to extreme missegregation of chromosomes (Saitoh et al., 1997 ; Jin et al., 2002 ; Pidoux et al., 2003 ; Hayashi et al., 2004 ; Kerres et al., 2006 ). Interestingly, the Sim4 complex plays a role in the incorporation of the kinetochore-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A and functions as a loading dock for the DASH complex (Takahashi et al., 2000 ; Pidoux et al., 2003 ; Liu et al., 2005 ; Sanchez-Perez et al., 2005 ). The nonessential fission yeast DASH complex is required for biorientation of sister chromatids (Liu et al., 2005 ; Sanchez-Perez et al., 2005 ). Members of the Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 complex are also associated with the central centromere and maintain the special chromatin architecture of this region but are not involved in CENP-A targeting (Goshima et al., 1999 ; Hayashi et al., 2004 ; Kerres et al., 2004 ; Liu et al., 2005 ). The Ndc80 complex in fission yeast and other organisms plays an important role in kinetochore-microtubule association and is needed for spindle checkpoint signaling (He et al., 2001 ; Janke et al., 2001 ; Nabetani et al., 2001 ; Wigge and Kilmartin, 2001 ; McCleland et al., 2003 ; Saitoh et al., 2005 ). Very recently, the Ndc80 complex and the Spc7 ortholog KNL-1 have been implicated in direct microtubule binding (Cheeseman et al., 2006 ; DeLuca et al., 2006 ). We had shown previously that Spc7 plays an important part at the microtubule–kinetochore interface as spc7+ was isolated as a suppressor of a mal3 mutant (Kerres et al., 2004 ). Mal3 is the fission yeast member of the EB1 microtubule-plus-end-tracking protein family, which regulates microtubule dynamics and mediates the interaction between different cellular complexes (reviewed in Gundersen and Bretscher, 2003 ; Mimori-Kiyosue and Tsukita, 2003 ; Vaughan, 2005 ). Mal3 is required for genome stability among others by preventing monopolar attachment of sister chromatids (Beinhauer et al., 1997 ; Asakawa et al., 2005 ). EB1 family members are targeted to kinetochores on polymerizing microtubules and play a role in kinetochore capture (Fodde et al., 2001 ; Kaplan et al., 2001 ; Tirnauer et al., 2002 ; Tanaka et al., 2005 ). Overexpression of the constitutive Spc7 kinetochore protein rescued all mitotic phenotypes of mal3 mutants and the Spc7 and Mal3 proteins interact physically. However, in contrast to the loss of the nonessential mal3+, loss of spc7+ results in inviability due to severe chromosome missegregation (Beinhauer et al., 1997 ; Kerres et al., 2004 ). This finding implies that the interaction with Mal3 is just one of the tasks of the Spc7 protein. We have thus extended our analysis of Spc7 function in mitosis.MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains and Media The yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All new strains were obtained by crossing the appropriate strains followed by tetrad or random spore analysis and genotyping. At least three double mutants were tested per cross. Tetrad analysis of 16 tetrads of the cross nuf2-1× spc7-23 revealed that spores carrying both mutations were able to germinate and divide twice, indicating synthetic lethality. Double mutants between spc7-23 and a null allele of a component of the DASH complex, namely duo1Δ, were inviable. Tetrad analysis of 16 tetrads revealed that double mutants germinated and then died. Strains carrying the cold-sensitive nda3-KM311 allele were arrested by incubating them for 10 h at 20°C. Strains were grown in rich media (YE5S) or minimal media (EMM or MM) with supplements (Moreno et al., 1991 ). MM with 5 μg/ml thiamine repressed the nmt promoters. For high-level expression from nmt promoters cells were grown in thiamine-less media for 22–48 h at 25°C or 18–24 h at 30 or 32°C. Nitrogen starvation experiments (two independent experiments/strain) were carried out as described (Jin et al., 2002 ). Synchronous cultures were monitored microscopically and the mitotic index (35–40%) was determined. Resistance to G418 was tested on YE5S plates containing 100 mg/l G418; increased sensitivity to thiabendazole (TBZ) on YE5S plates containing 6–7 μg/ml TBZ. Transcriptional silencing assays were carried out as described (Jin et al., 2002 ; Pidoux et al., 2003 ).
Generation of spc7ts Alleles and DNA Methods A pBSK-based plasmid containing the last 2028 bp of the 4095-bp-long spc7+ open reading frame (ORF) followed 3′ by the his3+ gene was used as a template for a mutagenic PCR reaction. A 3896-bp long DNA fragment containing the last 1664 bps of the spc7+ ORF and the his3+ selection marker were transformed into strain KG425. His+ transformants that grew at 25°C but not at 36°C were identified and correct integration of the mutagenized DNA fragments was tested via PCR. A spc7+ containing plasmid was able to fully rescue the temperature sensitivity of these strains, which were backcrossed twice. DNA sequence analysis showed point mutations at the following positions in the ORF: spc7-24 [3340 (A to T); 3959 (T to G)], spc7-23 [3887 (T to G); 4079 (G to T)], and spc7-30 [3026 (G to A); 3914 (A to G); 4067 (G to T)]. We generated an endogenous spc7-23-gfp fusion via PCR-based gene targeting using the KanR cassette (Bahler et al., 1998 ). spc7-n-gfp and spc7-c-gfp fusions were constructed by homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae, cut out of vector pRS316 and cloned behind the nmt1+ promoter in plasmid pJR2-3XL (Moreno et al., 2000 ). spc7-n and spc7-c contain the first 2460 or the last 1632 bp of the spc7+ ORF.Microscopy Photomicrographs of fixed cells were obtained using a Zeiss Axiovert200 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) coupled to a CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Herrsching, Germany; Orca-ER) and Openlab imaging software (Improvision, Coventry, United Kingdom). Immunofluorescence microscopy was carried out as described previously (Hagan and Hyams, 1988 ; Bridge et al., 1998 ). For tubulin staining the monoclonal anti-tubulin antibody TAT1 was used as primary antibody followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). HA or GFP fusion proteins were observed by indirect immunofluorescence using mouse anti-HA antibody (Covance, Princeton, NJ) or rabbit anti-GFP antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), respectively. Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-mouse antibodies or Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as secondary antibodies. Before mounting, cells were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images of living cells expressing an integrated version of GFP.nmt81.atb2 were obtained using a DeltaVision RT Imaging System (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA) with a Peltier-cooled CCD Coolsnap HQ Camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ). Optical sections were recorded every 0.3 μm in a volume totalling 6 μm every 10 s for 30 min. All images were analyzed using Imaris (Zurich, Switzerland; Bitplane) software. Transformed cells were grown in liquid EMM supplemented media without thiamine for 36–48 h at 25°C before analysis.Immunoprecipitations For immunoprecipitations or coimmunoprecipitations strains expressing Spc7-HA, Spc7-GFP, Spc7-23-GFP, Spc7-C-GFP, Mis12-GFP, Spc24-GFP, GFP-Atb2, or a combination of these tagged proteins were grown at 25 or 30°C in YE5S or MM overnight and then shifted to the restrictive temperature followed by protein extraction and immunoprecipitation as described previously (Kerres et al., 2004 ). Spc7 variants did not run at the expected size: for example, Spc7-GFP was detected at 110 instead of 181 kDa. Eluates were boiled, resolved on a SDS-8%-polyacrylamide gel, and blotted. Blots were probed with anti-HA antibody (monoclonal mouse; Roche Diagnostics, Alameda, CA) or anti-GFP antibody (polyclonal rabbit, Invitrogen) followed by the secondary antibody [peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L); Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories or peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG; GE Healthcare, respectively]. Immobilized antigens were detected using the ECL Advance Western blotting kit (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI).RESULTS Spc7 Is Not Required for Transcriptional Silencing of the Central Centromere Region To better understand the function of Spc7 in mitosis, we generated temperature-sensitive (ts) spc7 alleles by mutating the 3′ part of the spc7+ ORF (Materials and Methods). The three spc7 mutant strains, named spc7-23, spc7-24, and spc7-30, that showed the tightest ts phenotype were analyzed in greater detail (Figure 1 ; Nekrasov et al., 2003 ; Cheeseman et al., 2004 ; Meraldi et al., 2006 ). The endogenous spc7-23 ORF was tagged with gfp to determine the subcellular location of the mutant protein. The mutant Spc7-23 protein was detected at the kinetochore when cells were incubated at 25°C but not upon incubation at ≥32°C probably because of compromised Spc7-23 protein levels (Figure 1
We have shown previously that Spc7 is a constitutive kinetochore component that is associated with the central core region of the centromere (Kerres et al., 2004 ). Wild-type strains that carry a marker gene inserted at a centromeric region are auxotroph for this specific marker due to transcriptional silencing of the centromeric DNA (Pidoux and Allshire, 2000 ). Defective kinetochore components lead to alleviation of this transcriptional silencing (Allshire et al., 1995 ; Jin et al., 2002 ; Pidoux et al., 2003 ). To analyze if Spc7 was required for transcriptional repression, we tested if marker genes inserted at the otr2 (otr region of centromere 2) or cnt1 (cnt1 region of centromere 1) regions were expressed in the spc7-23 mutant strain (Partridge et al., 2000 ; Pidoux et al., 2003 ). Wild-type strains that contain the arg3+ gene inserted at the cnt1 region showed poor growth on arginine-minus medium, whereas kinetochore mutants such as sim4-193 allow growth on this medium (Figure 1spc7 Mutants Show Severe Defects in Chromosome Segregation and Spindle Attachment The mutations in the spc7+ ORF lead to aberrant chromosome segregation. At the permissive temperature, the majority of spc7-24 and spc7-30 mitotic cells appeared to segregate chromosomes equally, whereas expression of the spc7-23 allele at this temperature led to an increased number of abnormal mitosis (Figure 2 ). Release into rich medium at the nonpermissive temperature was followed by microscopic analysis of chromatin and spindles at various time points (0–11 h, Materials and Methods). Entry into mitosis was similar for wild-type and spc7-23 cells and the majority of mitotic cells was present at 6 and 10 h (first and second mitosis after release, respectively; Jin et al., 2002 ). Although no mitotic defects were observed in wild-type cells, chromosome segregation was severely affected in spc7-23 cells. In the first mitosis, 58% of anaphase cells showed unequally segregated chromatin or condensed chromatin smeared along an elongating spindle (Figure 2
The very high frequency of spc7 mitotic cells with nonseparated chromatin or condensed chromatin smeared along the elongating spindle can be caused by compromised kinetochore–microtubule interactions. We therefore assayed if centromeres were associated with the mitotic spindle by determining colocalization of centromere 1 marked with GFP (cen1-gfp) and the spindle in the spc7-23 strain (Nabeshima et al., 1998 ). In cells with an elongating spindle but smeared or nonseparated chromatin, 46% of the cen1-GFP signals were not spindle associated, implying that the microtubule–kinetochore interactions were severely affected in these cells (Figure 2 ). Furthermore in 50% of anaphase cells with unequally segregated chromatin, the cen1-GFP sister centromeres cosegregated, indicating that Spc7 is also required for bipolar chromosome orientation. In these cells, we measured the distance between the two green fluorescent protein (GFP) signals and found that in 8 of 15 cells the distance between the signals was significantly greater than 0.6 μm. Our data thus imply that cosegregation of sister chromatids is not simply due to a nondisjunction event (Nabeshima et al., 1998 ).The nonessential 10-subunit DASH complex coordinates bipolar chromosome attachment in S. pombe (Liu et al., 2005 ; Sanchez-Perez et al., 2005 ). We therefore attempted to construct double-mutant strains of spc7-23 with a null allele of duo1+, which encodes a component of the DASH complex (Materials and Methods). Such double mutants were inviable indicating that spc7 mutants require the presence of a functional DASH complex for survival at the permissive temperature.Compromised microtubule–kinetochore interactions should lead to the activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint that detects unattached, monotelic, or syntelically attached kinetochores (reviewed in Musacchio and Hardwick, 2002 ; Cleveland et al., 2003 ). Indeed, double mutants of spc7-23 with null alleles of mph1+ and mad2+, which code for conserved spindle checkpoint components (He et al., 1997 , 1998 ) showed reduced growth in comparison to the single-mutant strains (Figure 2Spc7 Is Required for Kinetochore Targeting of the MIND Complex Spc7 is part of the Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 complex (Obuse et al., 2004 ; Liu et al., 2005 ). To analyze the role of Spc7 within this complex, we determined the subcellular localization of the Ndc80 complex components Spc24 and Nuf2 and the MIND complex components Mis14 and Mis12 in the spc7-23 ts strain (Goshima et al., 1999 ; Nabetani et al., 2001 ; Wigge and Kilmartin, 2001 ; Obuse et al., 2004 ). Immunofluorescence analysis of the gfp-tagged fusion protein Spc24 revealed that this protein was localized correctly in the spc7-23 ts mutant incubated at the nonpermissive temperature (Figure 3
Next, we analyzed the growth phenotypes of spc7-23 and mis12-537 and nuf2-1 double mutants. spc7-23 mis12-537 double mutants were viable but showed slightly reduced growth compared with the single mutant strains at temperatures below 28°C. They were inviable at 28°C (Supplementary Figure 1B). We were unable to construct a spc7-23 nuf2-1 double mutant by tetrad analysis (Material and Methods, Supplementary Figure 1A). Microscopic analysis of spc7-23 nuf2-1 spores showed that such spores germinated and divided twice. We then tested if overexpression of spc7+ could rescue the ts phenotype of the Ndc80 component nuf2-1 or the MIND component mis12-537. Extra spc7+ resulted in reduced growth of the nuf2-1 strain at 30°C and could not suppress the nongrowth phenotype of this strain at higher temperatures (Supplementary Figure 1C). However, overexpression of spc7+ partially rescued the ts phenotype of the mis12-537 strain and extra mis12+ rescued the nongrowth phenotype of the spc7-23 strain at 32°C (Supplementary Figure 1D; Obuse et al., 2004 ). Thus, Spc7 and MIND show a tight functional interaction, whereas kinetochore targeting of Spc7 and components of the Ndc80 complex do not depend on each other.Spc7 Interacts Genetically with the Sim4 Complex Component Mal2 The Sim4 kinetochore complex is a 13-component protein complex that exists independently of the Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 complex (Liu et al., 2005 ). However, we have shown previously that the kinetochore localization of the Sim4 complex component Fta2 was reduced in a spc7 mutant strain (Kerres et al., 2006 ). This dependency seems to be specific for Fta2 as other Sim4 complex components such as Mal2-GFP, Mis6-HA, Sim4-GFP, and Dad1-GFP were localized correctly in a spc7-23 mutant background at the restrictive temperature (Figure 4
Interestingly, in a first screen for multicopy suppressors of the spc7 ts phenotype we identified the mal2+ ORF. When present on a plasmid mal2+ expressed from its wild-type promoter can partially rescue the nongrowth phenotype of spc7 mutant strains (Figure 4 spc7 Mutants Exhibits Defects in Spindle Formation and Function Immunofluorescence analysis of fixed spc7ts mitotic cells revealed that all three spc7ts mutants gave rise to abnormal spindle structures. For example, in the spc7-23 mutant strain grown at the restrictive temperature 47% of all spindles analyzed were aberrant. Immunofluorescence staining of spc7-23 spindles showed the following phenotypes: 1) elongating spindles with very thinly staining midzones (Figure 5 ; data not shown). The other spc7ts mutants such as spc7-30 showed similar spindle abnormalities (Supplementary Figure 2).
Interestingly, the synchronous spc7-23 culture experiments showed that only 6% of cells undergoing the first mitosis had spindle defects, whereas 52% of cells in the second mitosis had abnormal spindles. Thus spindle abnormalities arise when Spc7-23 can no longer be detected at the kinetochore. We next wanted to analyze these phenotypes in live cells with fluorescence microscopy and thus generated spc7ts mutant strains that harbored an integrated version of the α-tubulin atb2+ ORF tagged with gfp and driven by the nmt81 promoter (gfp.nmt81.atb2; Garcia et al., 2001 ). However, presence of the extra α-tubulin partially rescued the nongrowth phenotypes of spc7-24 and spc7-30 mutant strains (Figure 5 ). Overproduction of this C-terminal part of the spc7+ ORF affects chromosome segregation and leads to similar types of spindle defects as those observed for the spc7ts mutants (see below; Kerres et al., 2004 ). Spc7-C is able to associate with the kinetochore (see Figure 8 ). Examination of 30 spindles in wild-type GFP.nmt81.atb2 cells that overexpressed spc7-c revealed that 53% of these spindles were abnormal. Defects were found at all stages of spindle formation. In three cells formation of a bipolar spindle was defective as microtubules emanated from a single focus or microtubules coming from separated spindle pole bodies were unable to form a stable bipolar spindle (Figure 7 ). Whether spindle phase III was abolished in these cells or just severely delayed is yet unclear. Intriguingly, two spindles were assembled and started to elongate with apparently wild-type dynamics and then collapsed in midanaphase B. One of these spindles showed rejoining of the two spindle halves and further spindle elongation (Figure 7
After anaphase the postanaphase array (PAA), which is nucleated by the microtubule-organizing center [equatorial (e)MTOC], forms at the cell equator (reviewed in Hagan and Petersen, 2000 ). In wild-type GFP.nmt81.atb2 cells transformed with a vector control this structure was observed in 12/12 cells analyzed (Figure 7 ). In 20% of spc7-c–overexpressing cells or spc7ts mutants the interphase microtubules continued to grow when they reached the cell tip and thus curled around the cell tip (Figure 7Thus, the Spc7 kinetochore protein is required for the integrity of the mitotic spindle and also seems to influence the interphase microtubule cytoskeleton. We therefore determined if Spc7 was able to associate with the microtubule cytoskeleton. Wild-type Spc7 is associated with the kinetochore and we were unable to detect colocalization with the mitotic spindle even in an overexpression situation (Kerres et al., 2004 ; data not shown). The same holds true for the Spc7-C variant. Overexpression of a Spc7-C-GFP fusion protein from a plasmid gave rise to a kinetochore-specific fluorescence signal (Figure 8 ). In addition to staining of the nucleus, Spc7-N showed colocalization with the mitotic spindle during mitosis (Figure 8Genetic Interaction between spc7+ and Genes Coding for Microtubule Plus-End–associated Proteins spc7+ was isolated originally as a suppressor of a mal3 mutant. This suppression appears to be specific for mal3 as extra spc7+ cannot rescue the mutant phenotypes of dis1-288, dis1Δ, alp14Δ, or peg1-1 mutant strains (data not shown; Kerres et al., 2004 ). Dis1 and Alp14/Mtc1 are members of the TOG/XMAP215 family, whereas Peg1 is the fission yeast member of the CLASP family (Ohkura et al., 1988 ; Nabeshima et al., 1995 ; Garcia et al., 2001 ; Nakaseko et al., 2001 ; Grallert et al., 2006 ). Double-mutant strains between spc7 and alp14Δ, peg1-1 and mal3Δ showed that the absence of mal3+ in a spc7-23 mutant does not lead to an increased phenotype of that strain, possibly indicating that the two proteins act in the same pathway (Figure 8DISCUSSION During mitosis, the correct interaction of the kinetochore with spindle microtubules is essential for the precise segregation of the duplicated sister chromatids. We had proposed previously that the Spc7 protein plays a direct role at the microtubule–kinetochore interface as Spc7 was identified as a suppressor of the EB1 family member Mal3 and interacted with this protein genetically as well as physically (Kerres et al., 2004 ). Very recently the Spc7 ortholog from C. elegans, the KNL-1 protein, has been shown to have a specific microtubule-binding activity, suggesting that this protein family is part of the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore (Cheeseman et al., 2006 ).In this work, we have extended our analysis of Spc7 function and have shown 1) Spc7 is required for formation/function of the spindle in vivo, 2) Spc7 is required for kinetochore association of the MIND complex, and 3) Spc7 provides a genetic link between the two S. pombe kinetochore complexes Sim4 and Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 as it is required for kinetochore targeting of the Sim4 complex component Fta2 and extra expression of the Sim4 complex component Mal2 rescues the spc7 mutant phenotypes (Kerres et al., 2006 ).Extra Spc7 can partially rescue the temperature sensitivity of the mis12 and mis14 mutant strains (Supplementary Figure 1; Obuse et al., 2004 ). Furthermore, overexpression of mis12+ can partially suppress the nongrowth phenotype of a spc7ts mutant. In addition kinetochore targeting of Spc7 and MIND components was dependent on each other, whereas members of the Ndc80 complex associated with the kinetochore independent of functional Spc7. Overall, these experiments suggest that within the Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 complex Spc7 and the MIND complex show a tight functional interaction. The findings that MIND but not Ndc80 requires Spc7 for kinetochore targeting are in contrast to those observed for KNL-1, the C. elegans homologue of Spc7. In that organism the Ndc80 complex components Ndc80 and Spc25KBP-3 require KNL-1 for kinetochore association, whereas kinetochore targeting of the MIND complex component Mis12 is only slightly affected in KNL-1–depleted cells (Desai et al., 2003 ; Cheeseman et al., 2004 ). Kinetochore targeting of other Spc7 homologues remains to be determined: however, independent kinetochore association of MIND and Ndc80 complexes has been shown for a number of organisms (De Wulf et al., 2003 ; Emanuele et al., 2005 ; Saitoh et al., 2005 ).We also investigated if Spc7 played a role in kinetochore targeting of Sim4 complex components. We found that in spc7 mutant cells kinetochore localization of the Sim4 complex component Fta2 is significantly reduced, whereas other tested components of this complex do not appear to be affected (Kerres et al., 2006 , Figure 4 ; Okada et al., 2006 ).At present the mechanism by which extra mal2+ can suppress the spc7-23 mutant is unknown. In particular it is unclear how mal2+ overexpression can rescue the spc7-23 spindle defects, as Mal2 does not appear to be required for normal spindle structure (Jin et al., 2002 ). However, the mal2-1 mutant strain is hypersensitive to microtubule poisons and human cells depleted for the Mal2 ortholog Mcm21R/CENP-O show defects in spindle assembly (Jin et al., 2002 ; McAinsh et al., 2006 ).In fission yeast three distinct spindle phases have been defined and spc7-23 mutants show defects in all phases (Nabeshima et al., 1998 ). Phase I involves formation of the bipolar spindle in prophase to prometaphase. In phase II, which encompasses metaphase chromosome alignment to the end of anaphase A, the spindle has a constant length, whereas spindle elongation occurs in the third phase (anaphase B) by sliding apart of antiparallel microtubules in the spindle midzone. Entry into phase III is accompanied by a change in microtubule dynamics leading to more stable microtubules and spindle elongation (Ding et al., 1993 ; Nabeshima et al., 1995 , 1998 ; Mallavarapu et al., 1999 ; Sagolla et al., 2003 ; Khodjakov et al., 2004 ; Tolic-Norrelykke et al., 2004 ). Once the nuclei have been separated toward the cell ends, the spindle breaks down and the PAA appears in the cell middle (reviewed in Hagan, 1998 ; Figure 7 , 1992 , 1995 ; Bridge et al., 1998 ; West et al., 1998 ; Fleig et al., 2000 ; Petersen et al., 2001 ; Leverson et al., 2002 ). We were unable to assess defects in spindle phase II directly by microscopy. However the finding that cells overexpressing spc7-c showed a prolonged delay at the transition to phase III suggests that this spindle stage is also affected in spc7 mutants. Spindle stage III involves the rapid elongation of the spindle from 2 to 3 μm to 10–14 μm. Elongation in cells expressing spc7-c was discontinous as envisaged by the cycles of spindle elongation and spindle shortening (Figure 7 ). Similar phenotypes have been observed in S. cerevisiae cells expressing mutant version of the Cdc14p phosphatase or the Ndc10p kinetochore protein (Bouck and Bloom, 2005 ; Higuchi and Uhlmann, 2005 ). Cdc14p is required for changing microtubule dynamics at the onset of anaphase and targets the Ndc10p protein, which is needed for spindle stability to the plus ends of interpolar microtubules at the spindle midzone during anaphase (Goh and Kilmartin, 1993 ; Bouck and Bloom, 2005 ; Higuchi and Uhlmann, 2005 ).spc7 mutant cells that could execute spindle phase III had a high proportion of anaphase B spindles with abnormal spindle midzones. The spindle midzone, which consists of overlapping antiparallel microtubules (Ding et al., 1993 ), stained very thinly in living and fixed spc7 mutants (Figure 5 ; Le Masson et al., 2002 ; McCleland et al., 2003 ). Consistent with a abnormal spindle midzone, we observed fixed spc7 mutant cells with two spindle halves and elongating midanaphase B spindles that abruptly collapsed in the middle region in living cells (Figures 5 ; Khodjakov et al., 2004 ; Tolic-Norrelykke et al., 2004 ; Loiodice et al., 2005 ; Yamashita et al., 2005 ). Our data thus demonstrate that Spc7 is required for the integrity of the spindle midzone possibly by influencing the dynamics of the microtubule-plus ends. However we can at present not exclude that Spc7 regulates spindle function by some other means such as influencing microtubule bundling as similar phase III phenotypes have been observed in mutants with an ase1+ null allele (Loiodice et al., 2005 ; Yamashita et al., 2005 ). Fission yeast Ase1, which localizes to the spindle midzone in anaphase B, belongs to the conserved Prc1/MAP65 family of microtubule bundling proteins, that is required for central spindle formation and cytokinesis (Schuyler et al., 2003 ; Verni et al., 2004 ; Loiodice et al., 2005 ; Yamashita et al., 2005 ).Taken together our results indicate that Spc7 plays a profound role in the formation and function of the spindle. How does Spc7 exert its influence on spindle integrity? Our immunofluorescence analysis of an endogenously expressed wild-type Spc7 fusion protein shows an exclusive kinetochore localization. However, it is possible that Spc7 also associates with the mitotic spindle but we fail to detect it either because the signal is below the threshold sensitivity of our imaging system or due to a highly transient association of the protein with the spindle. In this respect, the colocalization of the Spc7 variant, Spc7-N, with the mitotic spindle might argue that Spc7 has the potential to associate with spindle microtubules and that this association is regulated by the C-terminal part of the Spc7 protein. Interestingly, a component of the Ndc80 kinetochore complex in budding yeast, namely Ndc80p, was shown to be associated with spindle microtubules using immunoelectron microscopy (Muller-Reichert et al., 1998 , 2003 ). An alternative, but not mutually exclusive possibility is that Spc7 could exert its influence on spindle microtubules by regulating proteins that localize to kinetochore and spindle. In S. cerevisiae the Cdc14p phosphatase is required for spindle localization of a number of proteins that affect spindle function among them the chromosomal passenger proteins aurora kinase Ipl1p and INCENP Sli15p as well as the kinetochore proteins Slk19p and Ndc10p (Pereira and Schiebel, 2003 ; Bouck and Bloom, 2005 ). We therefore looked at the localization of the S. pombe Cdc14p homologue Flp1/Clp1 (Cueille et al., 2001 ; Trautmann et al., 2001 ) in spc7 mutants and found a wild-type-like localization pattern (data not shown). Furthermore Spc7-N showed colocalization with the mitotic spindle in a flp1Δ strain (data not shown). We also found that spindle association of the chromosomal passenger protein Ark1 and the DASH component Dam1 is still possible in the spc7-23 mutant at the nonpermissive temperature (data not shown; (Petersen et al., 2001 ; Leverson et al., 2002 ; Liu et al., 2005 ; Sanchez-Perez et al., 2005 ). However in 40% of spc7ts cells with a late anaphase spindle and separated chromatin, Ark1 staining was not confined to the spindle midzone. Instead Ark1 was distributed as a broad signal over most of the spindle (data not shown). Whether this abnormal Ark1 localization is the cause or a consequence of the aberrant spindle midzone in spc7ts cells is at present unclear.After anaphase, the PAA, nucleated by the eMTOC microtubule organizing structure, is seen by the time the spindle reaches its maximum length (Hagan and Petersen, 2000 ; Figure 7 ; Venkatram et al., 2004 ; Samejima et al., 2005 ). Interestingly, components of the γ-tubulin complex, such as Alp4 and Alp6, are also required for a proper interphase microtubule cytoskeleton (Vardy and Toda, 2000 ). alp4 mutants have longer interphase microtubules that curve around the cell end: a phenotype very similar to what we have observed for spc7 mutants (Figure 7 ), thus raising the possibility that Spc7 and the eMTOC co-localize.[Supplemental Material]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Agnes Grallert, Steve Bagley, and Iain Hagan (Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester) for their generous help with the photomicrographs shown in Figure 7 Footnotes This article was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-08-0738) on April 18, 2007. ![]() The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).REFERENCES
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Jun; 12(3):308-19.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000]Chromosome Res. 2004; 12(6):521-34.
[Chromosome Res. 2004]Cell. 2003 Feb 21; 112(4):407-21.
[Cell. 2003]Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Apr; 8(2):212-8.
[Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998]Cell. 1997 Jul 11; 90(1):131-43.
[Cell. 1997]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003; 19():519-39.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003]Exp Cell Res. 2004 May 15; 296(1):21-7.
[Exp Cell Res. 2004]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(3):R23.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Genes Dev. 1999 May 1; 13(9):1140-55.
[Genes Dev. 1999]J Cell Biol. 2001 Jan 22; 152(2):349-60.
[J Cell Biol. 2001]Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Nov; 6(11):1135-41.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2004]EMBO J. 2005 Aug 17; 24(16):2919-30.
[EMBO J. 2005]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 22(20):7168-83.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Cell. 1997 Jul 11; 90(1):131-43.
[Cell. 1997]J Cell Biol. 2003 Apr 28; 161(2):295-307.
[J Cell Biol. 2003]Methods Enzymol. 1991; 194():795-823.
[Methods Enzymol. 1991]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 22(20):7168-83.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]J Cell Biol. 2003 Apr 28; 161(2):295-307.
[J Cell Biol. 2003]Yeast. 1998 Jul; 14(10):943-51.
[Yeast. 1998]Yeast. 2000 Jun 30; 16(9):861-72.
[Yeast. 2000]J Cell Sci. 1988 Mar; 89 ( Pt 3)():343-57.
[J Cell Sci. 1988]Genes Dev. 1998 Apr 1; 12(7):927-42.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Genes Dev. 2003 Oct 1; 17(19):2421-35.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Dec; 14(12):4931-46.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2003]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2255-68.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(3):R23.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Jun; 12(3):308-19.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000]Genes Dev. 1995 Jan 15; 9(2):218-33.
[Genes Dev. 1995]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 22(20):7168-83.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]J Cell Biol. 2003 Apr 28; 161(2):295-307.
[J Cell Biol. 2003]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 22(20):7168-83.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Nov; 9(11):3211-25.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1998]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]EMBO J. 2005 Aug 17; 24(16):2919-30.
[EMBO J. 2005]EMBO J. 2005 Aug 17; 24(16):2931-43.
[EMBO J. 2005]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 3(10):731-41.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Cell. 2003 Feb 21; 112(4):407-21.
[Cell. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22; 94(15):7965-70.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]J Cell Sci. 1998 Jun; 111 ( Pt 12)():1635-47.
[J Cell Sci. 1998]Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Nov; 6(11):1135-41.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2004]EMBO J. 2005 Aug 17; 24(16):2919-30.
[EMBO J. 2005]Genes Dev. 1999 Jul 1; 13(13):1664-77.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Chromosoma. 2001 Sep; 110(5):322-34.
[Chromosoma. 2001]J Cell Biol. 2001 Jan 22; 152(2):349-60.
[J Cell Biol. 2001]Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Nov; 6(11):1135-41.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2004]EMBO J. 2005 Aug 17; 24(16):2919-30.
[EMBO J. 2005]Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Oct; 17(10):4167-78.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2006]Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Oct; 17(10):4167-78.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2006]Genes Dev. 1998 Apr 1; 12(7):927-42.
[Genes Dev. 1998]EMBO J. 2001 Jul 2; 20(13):3389-401.
[EMBO J. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Nov; 9(11):3211-25.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1998]Curr Top Dev Biol. 2000; 49():133-59.
[Curr Top Dev Biol. 2000]Curr Biol. 2000 Jun 29; 10(13):766-75.
[Curr Biol. 2000]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Jul; 24(7):841-7.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2006]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]EMBO J. 1988 May; 7(5):1465-73.
[EMBO J. 1988]Genes Dev. 1995 Jul 1; 9(13):1572-85.
[Genes Dev. 1995]EMBO J. 2001 Jul 2; 20(13):3389-401.
[EMBO J. 2001]Curr Biol. 2001 Apr 17; 11(8):537-49.
[Curr Biol. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Dec; 15(12):5255-67.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Cell. 2006 Dec 1; 127(5):983-97.
[Cell. 2006]Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Oct; 17(10):4167-78.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2006]Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Nov; 6(11):1135-41.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2004]Genes Dev. 2003 Oct 1; 17(19):2421-35.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2255-68.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Genes Dev. 2003 Dec 1; 17(23):2902-21.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Oct; 16(10):4882-92.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2005]Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Oct; 17(10):4167-78.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2006]Genes Dev. 2003 Dec 1; 17(23):2902-21.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Nat Cell Biol. 2006 May; 8(5):427-9.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2006]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 22(20):7168-83.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]EMBO J. 2006 Sep 6; 25(17):4033-49.
[EMBO J. 2006]Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Nov; 9(11):3211-25.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1998]J Cell Biol. 1993 Jan; 120(1):141-51.
[J Cell Biol. 1993]Genes Dev. 1995 Jul 1; 9(13):1572-85.
[Genes Dev. 1995]Curr Biol. 1999 Dec 2; 9(23):1423-6.
[Curr Biol. 1999]J Cell Sci. 2003 Dec 15; 116(Pt 24):4891-903.
[J Cell Sci. 2003]J Cell Biol. 1993 Jan; 120(1):141-51.
[J Cell Biol. 1993]J Cell Biol. 2001 Jan 22; 152(2):349-60.
[J Cell Biol. 2001]Mol Microbiol. 2002 Mar; 43(6):1431-43.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]Genes Dev. 2003 Jan 1; 17(1):101-14.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Curr Biol. 2004 Aug 10; 14(15):1330-40.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31; 95(7):3661-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Chromosoma. 2003 Apr; 111(7):417-28.
[Chromosoma. 2003]Science. 2003 Dec 19; 302(5653):2120-4.
[Science. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12; 102(15):5408-13.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]J Cell Sci. 2001 Jul; 114(Pt 14):2649-64.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]Curr Top Dev Biol. 2000; 49():133-59.
[Curr Top Dev Biol. 2000]Curr Biol. 2004 May 4; 14(9):763-75.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 May; 15(5):2287-301.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Jun; 16(6):3040-51.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2005]EMBO J. 2000 Nov 15; 19(22):6098-111.
[EMBO J. 2000]