![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright : © 2007 Wykes et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Plasmodium Strain Determines Dendritic Cell Function Essential for Survival from Malaria 1 The Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 2 Immunology and Infection Unit, University of York, York, United Kingdom 3 Infection and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 4 Institute for Molecular Bioscience, CRC for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 5 Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 6 Centre for Immunology and Cancer Research, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia Artur Scherf, Editor Institut Pasteur, France * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Michael.Good/at/qimr.edu.au Received November 16, 2006; Accepted May 21, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The severity of malaria can range from asymptomatic to lethal infections involving severe anaemia and cerebral disease. However, the molecular and cellular factors responsible for these differences in disease severity are poorly understood. Identifying the factors that mediate virulence will contribute to developing antiparasitic immune responses. Since immunity is initiated by dendritic cells (DCs), we compared their phenotype and function following infection with either a nonlethal or lethal strain of the rodent parasite, Plasmodium yoelii, to identify their contribution to disease severity. DCs from nonlethal infections were fully functional and capable of secreting cytokines and stimulating T cells. In contrast, DCs from lethal infections were not functional. We then transferred DCs from mice with nonlethal infections to mice given lethal infections and showed that these DCs mediated control of parasitemia and survival. IL-12 was necessary for survival. To our knowledge, our studies have shown for the first time that during a malaria infection, DC function is essential for survival. More importantly, the functions of these DCs are determined by the strain of parasite. Our studies may explain, in part, why natural malaria infections may have different outcomes. Author Summary Malaria is a complex disease and there is little data on why Plasmodium infections have different outcomes that can range from asymptomatic to lethal infections. Since immunity is initiated by dendritic cells (DCs), several studies have investigated DC function during malaria. Current data on the effects of infection on DC functions are inconclusive, with one school of thought being that DC function is normal and the other that DC function is compromised. However, these studies have used different species and strains of Plasmodium. We have compared DC function during a lethal and nonlethal infection and found significant differences. Our study shows that the strain of parasite determines if DCs remain functional following infection. Moreover, by transferring DCs between mice, we show that DC function is essential for survival from a lethal infection. This study offers some insight into the current controversy and offers a plausible explanation for differences in the severity of disease. Introduction The factors that determine the virulence of Plasmodium are poorly understood. While adhesion of parasitized red blood cells (pRBCs) to the vascular endothelium in the brain [1–4], placenta [5–7], and other tissues is believed to be critical, inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in both human and rodent diseases [8–18]. Inappropriate cellular responses [19–23] or loss of immune cells during malaria [24–29] are also implicated in poor outcome. In particular, a recent study found that CD8+ dendritic cells (DCs) (only found in mice) die by apoptosis during rodent malaria [30]. DCs initiate immune responses and were first implicated in the pathogenesis of human malaria when in vitro studies found that Plasmodium falciparum–infected red cells could block lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced maturation of DCs in culture [31]. This was mediated by binding of the pRBCs to CD36 on DCs [32]. However, murine studies show that DCs can phagocytose P. chabaudi blood-stage pRBCs [33] and present pRBC-derived antigens to CD4+ T cells to initiate the development of protective Th1-dependent immune responses [33,34]. These responses are generated by CD8− DCs during the acute phase of infection [30]. However, DCs from infected mice are unable to prime CD8+ T cells to proliferate and secrete cytokines [34,35], which impairs cross-presentation of viral antigens [36]. It has been proposed that hemozoin, rather than infected erythrocyte membranes, impairs murine DC function [37], but another study suggests that hemozoin activates innate immune responses in mice by a toll-like receptor (TLR9)-mediated, MyD88-dependent, but chloroquine-sensitive mechanism [38]. In contrast, other studies have found that DCs from mice infected with P. chabaudi or P. yoelii were fully functional [39–41]. Although DCs have been shown to be important for initiating immunity to malaria [30,34–36,42,43], studies describing the function of DCs following infection have not explored the direct role of DCs in affecting disease outcome (i.e., survival, anaemia, or parasitemia). Furthermore, there is little data on why Plasmodium infections have different outcomes that can range from asymptomatic to lethal infections. On the basis of previous studies, we hypothesized that lethal parasites may compromise DC function [34–36], while DCs from nonlethal infections were fully functional and able to mediate immune responses and survival from malaria [39–41]. As such, we compared DC phenotype and function in response to lethal and nonlethal strains of the rodent parasite P. yoelii to correlate DC function with disease outcome. Splenic DCs were investigated, as the spleen has been shown to be a major site of parasite killing and regulation of parasite-specific immune responses [29,44,45]. Our studies show that DCs from mice with nonlethal infections are fully functional, while DC function is perturbed during lethal infections. The functional DCs from nonlethal infections can protect mice from lethal infections, demonstrating that DCs contribute substantially to the control of parasitemia and mediate survival from malaria. Results Comparison of Parasitemias during Lethal and Nonlethal Infections To establish the course of lethal and nonlethal Plasmodium infections, cohorts of C57Bl/6 mice were infected with either nonlethal P. yoelii 17XNL or lethal P. yoelii YM, and parasitemia was monitored over 32 d. Since preliminary studies (unpublished data) established that the two parasite strains had different growth rates, mice were given either 105 nonlethal or 104 lethal pRBCs so that all mice would develop patent (detectable) parasitemia at approximately the same time (Figure 1
Comparison of DC Surface Phenotype during Lethal and Nonlethal Infections Previous studies of mice infected with nonlethal P. yoelii found that DCs had an immature phenotype with lower levels of MHC class II, CD80, and CD86 expression [35]. However, studies have not determined if DC phenotype or maturation differ between lethal and nonlethal P. yoelii infections. As such, mice were infected with either nonlethal P. yoelii 17XNL or lethal P. yoelii YM, and the maturation of CD11c+ DCs was analysed in infected and naïve mice after 6.5 d. No significant differences in MHC class II, CD80, or CD86 expression by CD11c+ cells were detected between the two strains (Figure 2
We then enumerated the number of CD11c+ DCs per spleen following both infections and found that P. yoelii YM and P. yoelii 17XNL infections induced 3.5- and 10-fold increases, respectively, in the total numbers of CD11c+ DCs in the spleen compared to naïve mice (Figure 2 Comparison of Inflammatory Cytokines during Lethal and Nonlethal Infections Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is produced by CD8+ and B220+ DCs to mediate adaptive immune responses, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α produced by several sources mediates DC maturation. To investigate differences in these cytokines between lethal and nonlethal infections, mice were bled at days 0, 4, and 7 after infection, and the levels of inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-12 were measured in the serum (Figure 3
IL-12 has been implicated as an important cytokine in resistance to malaria [9,13,14,46–48]. To assess whether DCs secrete biologically active IL-12 following infection, total CD11c+ DC populations were isolated from infected and naïve mice and p70 IL-12 production was assessed using an ELISPOT assay (Figure 3 Finally, we measured the secretion of α-(type1)-interferon by DCs since (a) B220+ DCs secrete this cytokine, (b) mice with nonlethal infections had 3-fold more B220+ DCs than mice with lethal infections, and (c) since it is suggested to improve priming of myeloid DCs [53–55]. DCs from lethal and nonlethal infections were cultured with CpG DNA and poly IC [49,56], and the secretion of α-(type 1)-interferon was assessed by ELISA (Figure 3 Comparison of DC Functions following Infection DCs were then compared functionally from mice infected with lethal and nonlethal P. yoelii. CD11c+ DCs were isolated by immuno-magnetic positive selection from groups of infected (day 6.5) and naïve C57BL/6 mice, and varying numbers were cultured with a fixed number of allogeneic T cells (BALB/c), or syngeneic T cells from ovalbumin-specific T cell receptor transgenic (OTII) mice in the presence of ovalbumin (Figure 4
Comparison of DCs in Mediating Survival from Lethal Infections Since we observed significant differences in DC function between lethal and nonlethal infections, we adoptively transferred DCs from infected mice to naïve mice to determine whether DCs could modulate the outcome of infection in recipient mice. CD11c+ DCs were isolated from naïve mice or mice infected with either lethal P. yoelii YM or nonlethal P. yoelii 17XNL. The infected mice were drug cured before the isolation of DCs to prevent the transfer of parasites from donor mice. Approximately 1.5 × 107 DCs from each group were then transfused into naïve mice, which were then infected with lethal P. yoelii YM, 24 h later. Mice given DCs from naïve mice or from mice infected with P. yoelii YM died by the eighth day (Figure 5
We next investigated whether DCs mediated survival from lethal infections via IL-12 (Figure 5 We finally confirmed that survival from lethal infections was mediated by IL-12 produced by the donor DCs, and not by the recipient mice, by transferring DCs from IL-12 knockout (KO) mice. As such, DCs were isolated from wild-type C57Bl/6 or IL-12KO mice (on a C57Bl/6 background) infected with P. yoelii 17XNL and administered to naïve mice (1.5 × 107 DCs per mouse) as described above. The next day, these mice were infected with P. yoelii YM and monitored daily. A total of two-thirds of mice given DCs from IL-12KO mice died within 8 d, and the remaining mice died by the 15th day (Figure 6
These studies showed that DCs from lethal infections, previously shown to be unable to produce IL-12 (Figure 3 Discussion DCs are essential for initiating adaptive and innate immune responses in malaria. Recent studies have shown that CD8− DCs isolated at the acute phase of a nonlethal P. chabaudi infection can stimulate Ag-specific T cell responses [30]. In contrast, DCs from lethal P. berghei–infected mice are unable to prime CD8 T cells [34,35] or cross-present viral antigens during malaria [36]. Numerous studies have shown that IL-12 is an important cytokine in resistance to malaria [9,13,14,46–48], but the role of DCs in IL-12 production is not clear. Most studies to date have focussed on the direct effects of the infection on immunity to malaria (e.g., loss of CD8+ T cell priming) or have identified cellular responses that mediate protection (e.g., T cells are required to clear the parasite). However, to our knowledge, no study to date has explained why different infections have different outcomes or directly implicated DCs in mediating survival from malaria. To address this issue, we compared two strains of P. yoelii with different outcomes (lethal and nonlethal) and found that the strain of parasite determines the phenotype and function of DCs that mediate survival from a lethal infection using IL-12. Previous studies have shown that IL-12 production can be initiated within 2 d of an infection [47], and Th1 responses that predominate initially during infection can be protective [13,14,46–48,57–59]. We now show that DCs are a significant source of IL-12 needed to clear infection, since mice infected with the nonlethal P. yoelii 17XNL had nearly 100-fold more IL-12-producing DCs than mice given the lethal P. yoelii YM. Furthermore, when DCs from nonlethal infections were transferred to naïve mice that were then infected with a lethal strain, the mice survived significantly longer. Protection was shown to be mediated by IL-12 since depleting IL-12 blocked survival. The donor DCs were a major source of IL-12 as DCs from naïve mice or mice with lethal infections did not secrete IL-12 in vitro (Figure 2 Our studies also found that the level of T cell proliferation induced by DCs from mice infected with P. yoelii 17XNL nonlethal infections was significant but was not as high as that induced by DCs from naïve mice. This observation possibly reflects the high numbers of CD45R+ DCs found during nonlethal infections, which are generally not efficient at inducing proliferation of T cells [49,60]. The substantially diminished ability of DCs from mice infected with P. yoelii YM to induce T cell responses suggests that the cell-mediated immune response of mice following P. yoelii YM infection could be diminished in vivo and may contribute to the poor outcome. In conclusion, our studies have shown that following a Plasmodium infection the strain of parasite affects the nature and function of the DC response and that this response is a key determinant of survival. Our data suggest that while nonlethal parasites can induce the accumulation of functional DCs in the spleen that can mediate survival from infection, the lethal parasite induces a block in DC function. We thus speculate that lethal malaria results from a failure of DC function as well as a block in the up-regulation of Th1 immune responses. Thus this study may explain why infections can have different outcomes. Materials and Methods Animals. Specific pathogen-free, 6–8 wk old, female C57BL/6J mice were obtained from the Animal Resources Centre (http://www.sabc.murdoch.edu.au/), and OTII mice were kindly provided by William Heath (The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, http://www.wehi.edu.au/). These studies have been reviewed and approved by the Queensland Institute of Medical Research Animal Ethics Committee. Infection of mice for flowcytometry. Cohorts of three to six mice were infected intravenously with 105 P. yoelii 17XNL or 104 P. yoelii YM pRBCs, and spleens taken after 6.5 d for flow cytometry analysis as preliminary studies found that changes to the DCs were not clear before this time with both strains of parasite. Isolation of splenic DCs. Spleens from naïve or infected C57BL/6J mice were digested as previously described [61,62] and DCs isolated using either anti-CD11c MACS beads according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, http://www.miltenyibiotec.com/). The labelled cell preparations were passed through three to five columns until the purity was >95%. The isolated DCs were always labelled with anti-CD11c-PE for FACS analysis to confirm purity. Viability was assessed by trypan blue or labelling with 7-actinomycin D. Flowcytometry of DCs. To accurately quantify cell numbers shown in Figure 3 DC–allogeneic T cell mixed lymphocyte cultures. DCs were isolated from spleens of naïve or infected mice as described above, titrated, and cultured in triplicates with 2.5 × 105 naïve T cells, isolated from BALB/c or OTII mice. The OTII cultures were supplemented with 100 μg/ml ovalbumin (Sigma-Aldrich, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/). The T cells were isolated using either MACS anti-Thy 1 beads (Miltenyi Biotec) or R&D Systems (http://www.rndsystems.com/) mouse T cell enrichment kit. Both methods gave >98% purity. After 3 d the culture wells were pulsed with 3H-thymidine for 18 h, and radioactive uptake measured. Serum cytokines. The levels of cytokines in the serum were measured using the Becton Dickinson inflammation bead array according to manufacturer's instructions. IL-12 secretion. DCs were isolated as described above and cultured on MultiScreen-HA sterile plates previously coated with 10 μg/ml anti-mouse IL-12 (p70) antibody (Pharmingen) overnight, washed, and unbound sites blocked with 5% FCS. We added 200,000 cells to each well in FCS-supplemented medium alone or with 1.0 μM phosphorothioate-modified CpG oligonucleotide, 1,668 (5′-TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ATG CT-3′) [63] alone or with 10 μg LPS (Escherichia coli, Sigma) [63]. After overnight culture at 37 °C, plates were washed with 0.05% Tween-PBS and incubated with 0.5 μg/ml biotin-anti-IL-12 (Pharmingen) followed by AKP-labelled streptavidin (Pharmingen). NBT/BCIP tablets (Sigma) were used to visualize spots. Interferon-α secretion. DCs were isolated as described above, cultured with CpG DNA and poly-I:C as described previously [49,56], and the secretion of α-(type1)-interferon was assessed by ELISA (PBL Biomedical Laboratories, http://www.interferonsource.com/) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protection studies. CD11c+ DCs were obtained from spleens of naïve mice or mice infected with either 104 P. yoelii YM (lethal) or 105 P. yoelii 17XNL (nonlethal) pRBCs. Mice were treated with 250 μg pyrimethamine (i.p.) daily for 4 d to clear the infection 4 d after a lethal infection or 7 d after a nonlethal infection. The P. yoelii YM infections were started 3 d after the P. yoelii 17XNL infections so that both groups of mice could be cured and tested at the same time. At day 10, the spleens were digested and DCs isolated using anti-CD11c MACS beads and passed through three to five MACS columns to obtain a very pure preparation of DCs. Approximately 1.5 × 107 DCs were then transfused intravenously to naïve mice as stated in the text. After resting the mice for >15 h, they were infected with a lethal dose of P. yoelii YM (104 pRBCs). Mice were followed for 48 d when monitoring was stopped. To determine whether protection was mediated by IL-12, 0.5 mg of rat anti-mouse IL-12p40 (clone C17.8.20) was administered to mice intravenously the morning after the transfer of DCs, approximately 6–8 h before infection. Additional doses of the anti-IL-12 immunoglobulin were given on the morning of the third and sixth day of infection. To control for the effects of immunoglobulin, equivalent amounts of rat IgG were given to control mice at the same time. To confirm that protection was mediated by IL-12 secreted from donor DCs, CD11c+ DCs were obtained from spleens of C57BL/6 or IL-12KO mice (on a C57BL/6 background, >10 backcrosses to C57BL/6) infected with 105 P. yoelii 17XNL (nonlethal) pRBCs and then drug cured. Approximately 1.5 × 107 DCs were then transfused intravenously to naïve mice. After resting the mice for >15 h, they were infected with a lethal dose of P. yoelii YM (104 pRBCs). Mice were followed for 48 d when monitoring was stopped. Statistics. Error bars shown are means + standard error of means. p-Values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney nonparametric t-test with a two-sided tail on the basis of pooled data from two to four replicate experiments. The survival curves of mice were statistically analysed using a logrank test based on the Mantel–Haenszel test. Acknowledgments We thank H. Zhou for her technical assistance with some of the developmental assays. We also thank Christian Engwerda for his helpful discussions in preparing the manuscript and William Heath for providing mice. Abbreviations
Footnotes Author contributions. MNW, RT, and MFG conceived and designed the experiments. MNW, XQL, LB, and DIS performed the experiments. MNW analysed the data. MNW, KJS, and MJS contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. MNW and MFG wrote the paper. Funding. This research was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1997 Jul; 91(5):551-7.
[Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1997]Redox Rep. 2003; 8(5):295-9.
[Redox Rep. 2003]J Exp Med. 1995 Jul 1; 182(1):15-20.
[J Exp Med. 1995]Nat Med. 2000 Jan; 6(1):86-90.
[Nat Med. 2000]Immunobiology. 1993 Nov; 189(3-4):397-418.
[Immunobiology. 1993]Nature. 1999 Jul 1; 400(6739):73-7.
[Nature. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17; 98(15):8750-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]J Immunol. 2006 Jan 1; 176(1):441-50.
[J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2005 Sep 15; 175(6):3525-33.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Exp Med. 2006 Jun 12; 203(6):1427-33.
[J Exp Med. 2006]J Exp Med. 2006 Jun 12; 203(6):1427-33.
[J Exp Med. 2006]J Immunol. 2005 Sep 15; 175(6):3525-33.
[J Immunol. 2005]Nat Immunol. 2006 Feb; 7(2):165-72.
[Nat Immunol. 2006]Infect Immun. 2001 Aug; 69(8):5173-6.
[Infect Immun. 2001]J Immunol. 2005 May 15; 174(10):5921-5.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Exp Med. 2003 Jan 20; 197(2):143-51.
[J Exp Med. 2003]J Immunol. 1995 Sep 1; 155(5):2545-56.
[J Immunol. 1995]J Immunol. 2002 Feb 1; 168(3):1348-55.
[J Immunol. 2002]Infect Immun. 2000 Aug; 68(8):4399-406.
[Infect Immun. 2000]Clin Exp Immunol. 1999 Aug; 117(2):343-9.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 1999]Exp Hematol. 1998 Jan; 26(1):45-52.
[Exp Hematol. 1998]J Immunol. 2001 Mar 1; 166(5):2961-9.
[J Immunol. 2001]Immunol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 80(5):484-8.
[Immunol Cell Biol. 2002]Eur J Immunol. 2001 Oct; 31(10):3026-37.
[Eur J Immunol. 2001]J Immunol. 2001 May 1; 166(9):5448-55.
[J Immunol. 2001]J Exp Med. 2006 Jun 12; 203(6):1427-33.
[J Exp Med. 2006]J Immunol. 2005 Sep 15; 175(6):3525-33.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Exp Med. 2003 Jan 20; 197(2):143-51.
[J Exp Med. 2003]Nat Immunol. 2006 Feb; 7(2):165-72.
[Nat Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 1995 Sep 1; 155(5):2545-56.
[J Immunol. 1995]J Immunol. 1999 Feb 1; 162(3):1582-9.
[J Immunol. 1999]J Immunol. 2002 Feb 1; 168(3):1348-55.
[J Immunol. 2002]Infect Immun. 2000 Aug; 68(8):4399-406.
[Infect Immun. 2000]Clin Exp Immunol. 1999 Aug; 117(2):343-9.
[Clin Exp Immunol. 1999]Exp Hematol. 1998 Jan; 26(1):45-52.
[Exp Hematol. 1998]Eur J Immunol. 2001 Oct; 31(10):3026-37.
[Eur J Immunol. 2001]J Exp Med. 2001 Oct 15; 194(8):1171-8.
[J Exp Med. 2001]J Immunol. 1998 Aug 1; 161(3):1313-9.
[J Immunol. 1998]J Immunol. 1998 Aug 1; 161(3):1313-9.
[J Immunol. 1998]J Immunol. 1998 Jun 15; 160(12):5898-906.
[J Immunol. 1998]Eur J Immunol. 2001 Oct; 31(10):3026-37.
[Eur J Immunol. 2001]J Immunol. 2001 May 1; 166(9):5448-55.
[J Immunol. 2001]