![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Sasai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is downregulated in transformed astrocyte cells: implications for anti-glioma therapies 1Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, W15 N7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan 2KAN Research Institute Inc., 6-7-3 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan 3Kashiwaba Neurosurgical Hospital, 15-7-20, Tsukisamu E1, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo 062-8513, Japan Corresponding author.Ken Sasai: ksasai/at/med.hokudai.ac.jp; Tsuyoshi Akagi: t-akagi/at/kan.eisai.co.jp; Eiko Aoyanagi: eiko-a/at/patho2.med.hokudai.ac.jp; Kouichi Tabu: k-tabu/at/med.hokudai.ac.jp; Sadao Kaneko: srkaneko/at/seagreen.ocn.ne.jp; Shinya Tanaka: tanaka/at/med.hokudai.ac.jp Received April 26, 2007; Accepted June 5, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background A novel alkylating agent, temozolomide, has proven efficacious in the treatment of malignant gliomas. However, expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) renders glioma cells resistant to the treatment, indicating that identification of mechanisms underlying the gene regulation of MGMT is highly required. Although glioma-derived cell lines have been widely employed to understand such mechanisms, those models harbor numerous unidentified genetic lesions specific for individual cell lines, which complicates the study of specific molecules and pathways. Results We established glioma models by transforming normal human astrocyte cells via retroviral-mediated gene transfer of defined genetic elements and found that MGMT was downregulated in the transformed cells. Interestingly, inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation failed to increase MGMT protein levels in the transformed astrocyte cells as well as cultured glioblastoma cell lines, whereas the treatment partially restored mRNA levels. These observations suggest that downregulation of MGMT may depend largely on cellular factors other than promoter-hypermethylation of MGMT genes, which is being used in the clinic to nominate patients for temozolomide treatment. Furthermore, we discovered that Valproic acid, one of histone deacetylase inhibitors, suppressed growth of the transformed astrocyte cells without increasing MGMT protein, suggesting that such epigenetic compounds may be used to some types of gliomas in combination with alkylating agents. Conclusion Normal human astrocyte cells allow us to generate experimental models of human gliomas by direct manipulation with defined genetic elements, in contrast to tumor-derived cell lines which harbor numerous unknown genetic abnormalities. Thus, we propose that the study using the transformed astrocyte cells would be useful for identifying the mechanisms underlying MGMT regulation in tumor and for the development of rational drug combination in glioma therapies. Background Gliomas, accounting for 30% of adult primary brain tumors, are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system and are classified into four clinical grades, with the most aggressive and lethal tumors being grade IV glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [1,2]. The median survival of GBM patients is less than one year from initial diagnosis, and many of the commonly used chemotherapeutic agents have limited effects on these malignant tumors [3]. Recently, there has been increasing hope that temozolomide, a novel alkylating agent, will prove efficacious in the treatment of human glioma [4,5]. However, a number of studies have suggested that, in tumors, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) provides resistance to treatment with temozolomide, unless expression is lost by promoter methylation or there is direct inhibition of MGMT activity [6]. Considering the attractive efficacy of temozolomide, one of the greatest challenges facing the field may be to identify therapeutic agents that suppress MGMT expression, as such drugs may sensitize resistant glioma cells to temozolomide. Thus, establishment of more sophisticated systems to understand the functions and regulation of MGMT are highly desired. Normal human cells, genetically modified by retroviral-mediated gene transfer, have proven important, because such systems are useful for identifying factors directly contributing to tumorigenesis, in contrast to tumor-derived cell lines which harbor numerous unknown genetic abnormalities [7,8]. GBMs are believed to arise from astrocyte cells by means of stepwise accumulation of genetic abnormalities [4,9], and immortalized normal human astrocyte (NHA) cells had been established by introducing the telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) in combination with human papillomavirus E6/E7 to inactivate both p53 and pRb pathways [10]. It had been systematically demonstrated that the immortalized NHA cells, expressing activated Ras (H-RasV12) or expressing both H-RasV12 and an active form of Akt (myrAKT), formed tumors consistent with human anaplastic astrocytoma or GBM in intracranial- and flank-xenografts models [10,11]. These studies indicate that such systems are useful for glioma research to understand direct functions and regulation of genetic elements during transformation and gliomagenesis. Here we created similar experimental models using NHA cells by introducing the simian virus 40 early region (SV40ER) instead of human papillomavirus E6/E7. The SV40ER encodes both small-t antigen, a suppressor of protein phosphatase 2A (which is downregulated in half of human glioma) [12] and large-T antigen, which directly binds to and inactivates p53, as well as pRB and the closely related proteins p107 and p130 [13]. Using such genetically modified NHA cells, we demonstrate that MGMT is downregulated during oncogene-mediated transformation of astrocyte cells. Since our results indicate that downregulation of MGMT expression was not primarily dependent upon promoter hypermethylation, inhibitors of DNA methylation or histone deacetylases (HDACs) may be used in combination with alkylating agents for improved treatment of some GBM cases. We propose that the NHA cell systems are useful for investigating the mechanisms underlying MGMT expression and for improving glioma therapies. Results To create an experimental model of human gliomas, NHA cells were introduced with genes for hTERT (T), SV40ER (S), H-RasV12 (R), and myrAKT (A) (Figure (Figure1A;1A
Using the NHA cell system described above, we found that the mRNA level of MGMT was decreased in immortalized (NHA/TS) and transformed (NHA/TSR and NHA/TSRA) cells and that MGMT expression was also downregulated in the flank xenografts derived from NHA/TSR and NHA/TSRA cells (Figure (Figure3A).3A
To understand the mechanism underlying the downregulation of MGMT in transformed NHA cells, we first analyzed the MGMT expression following treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytosine (5-aza-dC) and/or Valproic acid (VPA), because it has been widely acknowledged that aberrant methylation of MGMT-promoter contributes to the gene expression changes [6]. Inhibitors of HDACs, such as VPA and trichostatin A, act synergistically with 5-aza-dC (a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and demethylating agent in dividing cells) to further increase the expression of genes silenced in association with promoter hypermethylation [21]. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis revealed that treatments with 5-aza-dC alone or combined treatment with 5-aza-dC/VPA slightly increased MGMT mRNA levels, when the PCR was performed in a condition where the positive control reaction (mRNA from the NHA/TS cells) was saturated (data not shown), suggesting that the downregulation may have been partially mediated by promoter hypermethylation. However, combined treatment with 5-aza-dC/VPA was insufficient to restore MGMT protein levels in NHA/TSR and NHA/TSRA cells whereas the treatment clearly induced acetyltation and demethylation of histone H3 (Figure (Figure4A),4A
In an attempt to identify such missing factors contributing to gene regulation of MGMT, we tested if the expression of wild type p53 restores MGMT levels, as MGMT was slightly decreased in the NHA/TS cells where p53 is inactivated by large T antigen (Figure (Figure3).3
Since MGMT seems to be regulated in several ways, it is possible that inhibitors of HDACs may be used for therapies for some glioma patients in combination with alkylating agents, such as temozolomide. Since VPA, which inhibits both class I and class II HDACs [29], has displayed potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activities against brain tumor cells [30], it is one attractive candidate agent. The treatment with VPA appreciably inhibited growth of the NHA/TSRA cells in a dose dependent manner (Figure (Figure6A)6A
Discussion Much of our understanding of the molecular basis of gliomagenesis derives from the study of established cell lines that are explanted from human tumors. Such cell lines are often assumed to be representative of the original diseases, and they have been extensively employed for the identification and preclinical testing of potential therapeutic compounds. However, they harbor an unknown number of genetic lesions, which complicates the study of specific molecules and pathways. Indeed, with respect to p53-mediated MGMT regulation, there have been contradictory observations, where transient knockdown of p53 caused MGMT downregulation in SF767 glioma cells without affecting promoter methylation [28] but increased MGMT expression in T98 cells [27]. Since such discrepancy may depend on unidentified mutations specific for individual cell lines, it is difficult to provide constant conclusions using tumor-derived cell lines alone. Therefore, normal human cells as well as genetically engineered mouse models will prove very useful, which allow us to generate experimental models of human cancers by direct manipulation with defined genetic elements [7,8]. Here we established glioma models from NHA cells and demonstrated that MGMT is downregulated in the transformed astrocyte cells. Although numerous studies have proposed the strong linkage between MGMT expression and promoter hypermethylation of the gene, treatment with epigenetic compounds (5-aza-dC/VPA) was unable to increase MGMT protein levels in the transformed NHA cells or in cultured tumor cells. Some previous reports demonstrated the epigenetic regulation of MGMT expression by treating tumor cell lines with 5-aza-dC and testing the MGMT levels by RT-PCR [32,33]. However, based on the data presented here, such limited evaluation might not be sufficient, as RT-PCR assay overestimates the MGMT restoration. Since inappropriate evaluation would mislead the development of advanced therapies, protein levels or enzyme activity of MGMT in the cells treated with such compounds should be examined and compared with those in normal cells. In fact, the use of alkylating agents in combination with HDAC inhibitors has been hampered, probably because it has been suspected that such agents would increase MGMT expression. However, we showed that two-week-treatment with VPA inhibited tumor cell growth without increasing MGMT expression, suggesting potential clinical use although further preclinical studies are required. As the treatment with 5-aza-dC/VPA slightly increased mRNA levels of MGMT in cultured glioma cells (including U87MG, U251MG and transformed NHA cells), methylation status might be involved in MGMT regulation to some extent. However, such treatment was insufficient to restore protein expression of MGMT, suggesting that the regulation mechanisms may largely depend on other cellular factors. Although p53 does not seem to contribute directly to MGMT expression, it is possible that other transcription factors, whose expressions have been downregulated or silenced during transformation and gliomagenesis, may collaborate with HDAC inhibitors to increase MGMT protein. Interestingly, the sonic hedgehog pathway has been shown to regulate the self-renewal of CD133-positive glioblastoma cells, which were resistant to temozolomide treatment [34]. Furthermore, some of CD133-positive glioma cultures highly expressed MGMT as well as target genes of the sonic hedgehog pathway [35]. Thus, it is possible that the regulation of MGMT expression may be partially mediated by the sonic hedgehog pathway in some cases. Conclusion As discussed above, MGMT seems to be regulated by a number of ways in gliomas. The detailed mechanisms should be further analyzed as MGMT level is a critical determinant for efficacy of therapies with alkylating agents. Thus, identification of molecules and compounds that increase MGMT expression by screening NHA/TSR or NHA/TSRA cells with cDNA- and chemical-libraries would be very useful for the development of rational drug combination. We propose that the NHA cell system creates refined human glioma models for the systematic dissection of genetic alterations and elucidation of the complexities of the signaling pathways important for gliomagenesis. These systems also provide powerful means to find and authenticate molecules of particular promise for therapeutic targeting, and the present study provides an important proof-of-principle test for such systems. Methods Clinical samples Brain tumor specimens were obtained, after informed consent, from patients undergoing tumor resection at the Kashiwaba Neurosurgical Hospital. Cell culture NHA cells (Cambrex Bio Science, Walkersville, MD, USA) were cultured in the astrocyte growth medium (AGM; Cambrex Bio Science). All other cells including immortalized NHA cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (Seikagaku Co., Tokyo, Japan), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1 mM Glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin G and 50 μg/ml streptomycin. All cultures were incubated at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. For the combination treatment (5-aza-dC/VPA), 5-aza-dC (1 μM; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added for an initial incubation of 48 h, after which VPA (1 mM; Sigma) was added for an additional 24 h. Retroviral vectors and retroviral-mediated gene transfer A cDNA fragment encoding murine ecotropic retrovirus receptor (EcoVR) was obtained from the retroviral plasmid pCX4hyg-EcoVR [14], and then subcloned into pCX4redEx vector [GenBank: AB296084]. Myc-His-tagged active form of mouse AKT1 cDNA, which has N-terminal myristoylation, was isolated from the pUSEamp-myr-AKT plasmid (Upstate, Charlottesville, VA, USA) and subcloned into pCX4bleo retroviral vector [GenBank: AB086388]. Full-length cDNAs for human MGMT and p53 were generated by PCR and subcloned into pCX4bleo and pCX4gfp [GenBank: AB296083] retroviral vectors, respectively. Primer sequences used in this experiment included 5'-ATG GAC AAG GAT TGT GAA-3' and 5'-TCA GTT TCG GCC AGC AGG-3' for human MGMT and 5'-CTG AAT TCA TGG AGG AGC CGC AGT CAG-3' and 5'-CCG AAT TCA GTC TGA GTC AGG CCC TTC-3' for human p53. Other retroviral vectors and the procedure of retroviral-mediated gene transfer were described previously [14]. The murine EcoVR was first introduced into NHA cells by using amphotropic virus, in order to make human cells susceptible to the subsequent infection with ecotropic viral vectors. Infected cell populations were selected in blasticidin S (20 μg/ml), G418 (1000 μg/ml), puromycin (500 ng/ml), or zeocine (500 μg/ml) for two weeks. In all cases, cultures arose from polyclonal expansion of infected cells. RT-PCR Total RNA was isolated with the TRI Reagent (Sigma) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the oligo-dT primer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the Superscript II (Invitrogen). The levels of MGMT were analyzed by PCR with the KOD plus DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) using the primers described above. PCR primers for Glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were described previously [15]. Soft-agar colony formation assay and xenograft propagation Soft-agar colony formation assay [15] and xenograft propagation [36] were carried out as described. Female athymic nude mice (BALB/cAJcl-nu/nu) were purchased from Clea Japan (Tokyo, Japan) and all animal procedures were carried out according to the protocol approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine. Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using standard protocols. Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and anti-p53 (DO-7; Dako) monoclonal antibodies. Immunoblotting Protein determination, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were carried out as described previously [37], and reactive protein signals were visualized by chemiluminescence using the ECL reagent (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA) or the SuperSignal West Femto reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Antibodies were obtained from the following sources: anti-SV40 large T antigen (Ab-1) and anti-SV 40 small t antigen (Ab-3) monoclonal antibodies (Oncogene Research Product, San Diego, CA, USA); anti-p53 and anti-AKT polyclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA); anti-RAS and anti-p27KIP1 monoclonal antibodies (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, USA); anti-dimethylated Histone-H3 (Me-H3) and anti-acetylated Histone-H3 (Ac-H3) polyclonal antibodies (Upstate); anti-MGMT (MT3.1) and anti-ACTIN monoclonal antibodies (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA); an anti-p21WAF1 monoclonal antibody (Ab-1; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA); an anti-hTERT (L20) polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Abbreviations MGMT: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase GBM: glioblastoma multiforme NHA: normal human astrocyte hTERT (T): human telomerase catalytic subunit H-RasV12 (R): activated H-Ras myrAKT (A): myristoylated form (active form) of AKT SV40ER (S): simian virus 40 early region HDAC: histone deacetylase VPA: Valproic acid 5-aza-dC: 5-aza-2'-deoxycytosine RT-PCR: reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction GAPDH: Glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Competing interests The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions KS designed the research, carried out all experiments except for immunohistochemistry, and drafted the manuscript. TA participated in the design of the study and contributed to new reagents. EA carried out H&E staining and immunohistochemistry. KT participated in epigenetic studies. SK collected and analyzed clinical samples. ST carried out histological analyses, conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Additional file 1 Histopathological analysis of human brain tumors. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained with H&E. Low- (×100) and high- (×400) magnification images are shown (bar in G1, 200 μm). Tissue sections were also processed for immunohistochemistry using Ki-67 and p53 antibodies. Staining intensities were summarized in Table 2. Click here for file(2.3M, pdf) Acknowledgements We thank Jared Ordway (Orion Genomics, St. Louis, MO), Christopher Calabrese (St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN) and Taiko Sukezane (KAN Research Institute, Kobe, Japan) for their helpful discussion and critical reading of this manuscript. We thank Tomoyuki Shishido (Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan) for providing the reagents and Miho Nodagashira (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan) for her excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (to ST), the Suhara Memorial Foundation (to ST), and Grant-in-Aid from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to ST). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Brain Pathol. 1993 Jul; 3(3):255-68.
[Brain Pathol. 1993]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002 Mar; 61(3):215-25; discussion 226-9.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002]Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 1; 64(19):6892-9.
[Cancer Res. 2004]J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 10; 24(8):1253-65.
[J Clin Oncol. 2006]Lancet Oncol. 2001 Sep; 2(9):552-60.
[Lancet Oncol. 2001]Trends Mol Med. 2004 Nov; 10(11):542-8.
[Trends Mol Med. 2004]Trends Mol Med. 2004 Jul; 10(7):344-50.
[Trends Mol Med. 2004]J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 10; 24(8):1253-65.
[J Clin Oncol. 2006]Mutat Res. 2005 Aug 25; 576(1-2):54-65.
[Mutat Res. 2005]Cancer Res. 2001 Jul 1; 61(13):4956-60.
[Cancer Res. 2001]Int J Cancer. 2001 Sep; 93(6):798-804.
[Int J Cancer. 2001]Oncogene. 2005 Nov 21; 24(52):7746-55.
[Oncogene. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 11; 100(23):13567-72.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Oncogene. 2007 Jan 18; 26(3):449-55.
[Oncogene. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4; 103(14):5490-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Oncogene. 2005 Aug 25; 24(36):5648-55.
[Oncogene. 2005]Lancet Oncol. 2001 Sep; 2(9):552-60.
[Lancet Oncol. 2001]Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Apr; 4(4):296-307.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2004]Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents. 2003 May; 3(3):187-99.
[Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents. 2003]Cancer. 1995 Mar 15; 75(6):1339-42.
[Cancer. 1995]Neuropathology. 2003 Sep; 23(3):203-9.
[Neuropathology. 2003]Oncogene. 2007 Jan 11; 26(2):186-97.
[Oncogene. 2007]Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 1; 65(17):7573-9.
[Cancer Res. 2005]Cancer Res. 2007 Jan 15; 67(2):580-4.
[Cancer Res. 2007]EMBO J. 2001 Dec 17; 20(24):6969-78.
[EMBO J. 2001]J Neurochem. 2002 Oct; 83(1):12-9.
[J Neurochem. 2002]APMIS. 2006 Oct; 114(10):731-43.
[APMIS. 2006]Cancer Res. 2007 Jan 15; 67(2):580-4.
[Cancer Res. 2007]Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 1; 65(17):7573-9.
[Cancer Res. 2005]Trends Mol Med. 2004 Nov; 10(11):542-8.
[Trends Mol Med. 2004]Trends Mol Med. 2004 Jul; 10(7):344-50.
[Trends Mol Med. 2004]Oncogene. 2004 May 13; 23(22):4014-22.
[Oncogene. 2004]Mol Cancer Ther. 2005 Jan; 4(1):61-9.
[Mol Cancer Ther. 2005]Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 23; 17(2):165-72.
[Curr Biol. 2007]Mol Cancer. 2006 Dec 2; 5():67.
[Mol Cancer. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 11; 100(23):13567-72.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Oncogene. 2007 Jan 18; 26(3):449-55.
[Oncogene. 2007]Oncogene. 2007 Jan 18; 26(3):449-55.
[Oncogene. 2007]Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15; 66(8):4215-22.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 22(20):7015-23.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2002]