Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2007; 2(6): e540.
Published online Jun 20, 2007. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0000540
PMCID: PMC1890307

Post-Infection Immunodeficiency Virus Control by Neutralizing Antibodies

Douglas Nixon, Academic Editor

Abstract

Background

Unlike most acute viral infections controlled with the appearance of virus-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), primary HIV infections are not met with such potent and early antibody responses. This brings into question if or how the presence of potent antibodies can contribute to primary HIV control, but protective efficacies of antiviral antibodies in primary HIV infections have remained elusive; and, it has been speculated that even NAb induction could have only a limited suppressive effect on primary HIV replication once infection is established. Here, in an attempt to answer this question, we examined the effect of passive NAb immunization post-infection on primary viral replication in a macaque AIDS model.

Methods and Findings

The inoculums for passive immunization with simian immunodeficiency virus mac239 (SIVmac239)-specific neutralizing activity were prepared by purifying polyclonal immunoglobulin G from pooled plasma of six SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaques with NAb induction in the chronic phase. Passive immunization of rhesus macaques with the NAbs at day 7 after SIVmac239 challenge resulted in significant reduction of set-point plasma viral loads and preservation of central memory CD4 T lymphocyte counts, despite the limited detection period of the administered NAb responses. Peripheral lymph node dendritic cell (DC)-associated viral RNA loads showed a remarkable peak with the NAb administration, and DCs stimulated in vitro with NAb-preincubated SIV activated virus-specific CD4 T lymphocytes in an Fc-dependent manner, implying antibody-mediated virion uptake by DCs and enhanced T cell priming.

Conclusions

Our results present evidence indicating that potent antibody induction post-infection can result in primary immunodeficiency virus control and suggest direct and indirect contribution of its absence to initial control failure in HIV infections. Although difficulty in achieving requisite neutralizing titers for sterile HIV protection by prophylactic vaccination has been suggested, this study points out a possibility of non-sterile HIV control by prophylactic vaccine-induced, sub-sterile titers of NAbs post-infection, providing a rationale of vaccine-based NAb induction for primary HIV control.

Introduction

In the natural courses of HIV infections, the host immune responses fail to contain the virus replication and allow persistent plasma viremia. While virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses exert strong suppressive pressure on primary HIV replication [1][7], the contribution of virus-specific antibodies in clearance of primary HIV infection has remained unclear [8].

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) play a central role in control of most viral infections, but in HIV infections, NAb induction is not efficient in the early phase due to its unusual neutralization-resistant nature, such as the sophisticated masking of neutralizing epitopes in HIV envelope [8][11], and protective efficacies of post-infection NAbs in vivo have remained elusive. While evidence of virus escape implies NAb selective pressure to a certain extent [10], [12][13], it has been speculated that post-infection NAbs could exert only a limited suppressive effect on primary HIV replication [14][16].

Post-infection passive NAb immunization studies in macaque AIDS models would contribute to elucidation of its protective role, in complementation with studies determining the requisites for sterile protection by pre-challenge administered NAb titers [14], [16][21]. A model of CCR5-tropic simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection that induces acute loss of memory CD4+ T cells like HIV infections in humans [22][25] would be adequate for assessment of post-infection NAb efficacies in primary immunodeficiency virus infection.

In the present study, we examined the effect of passive NAb immunization at day 7 post-challenge on primary viral replication in a macaque AIDS model of CCR5-tropic SIVmac239 infection. Remarkably, our analysis revealed control of primary SIVmac239 replication by the passive NAb immunization post-infection.

Methods

Animal experiments

Burmese rhesus macaques (Macaca Mulatta) were maintained in accordance with the Guideline for Laboratory Animals of National Institute of Infectious Diseases and National Institute of Biomedical Innovation. Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) haplotypes were determined by reference strand-mediated conformation analysis as described previously [6], [26]. Blood collection, vaccination, virus challenge, passive immunization, and lymph node biopsy were performed under ketamine anesthesia. For vaccination, animals intramuscularly received a priming with 5 mg of CMV-SHIVdEN DNA encoding SIVmac239 Gag, Pol, Vif, and Vpx, SIVmac239-HIV-1DH12 chimeric Vpr, and HIV-1DH12 Tat and Rev, followed by an intranasal booster six weeks later with 1×108 CIU (cell infectious units) of replication-competent Sendai virus expressing Gag (SeV-Gag) in macaque V5 or 6×109 CIU of F-deleted replication-defective SeV-Gag in other vaccinees as described previously [6]. Animals were challenged intravenously with 1,000 TCID50 (50 percent tissue culture infective dose) of SIVmac239, three months after booster in case of vaccinees. For passive immunization, animals were intravenously administered with 300 mg of anti-SIV immunoglobulin G (IgG) or control IgG at day 7 post-challenge.

Antibody preparation

Pools of plasma showing SIVmac239-specific NAb titers of 1[ratio]4 to 1[ratio]64 were obtained from six SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaques with NAb induction in the chronic phase for preparing the IgG inoculums for passive NAb immunization. IgG was purified from the plasma after heat-inactivation and filtration by Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (Amersham) and concentrated by Amicon Ultra 4, MW50000 (Millipore) to 30 mg/ml. This IgG solution had SIVmac239-specific NAb titer of 1[ratio]16; i.e., 5 µl of 16-fold-diluted antibodies killed 5 µl of 10 TCID50 SIVmac239 on MT-4 cells. Control IgG was prepared from non-infected rhesus macaques. Neutralizing F(ab')2 was obtained by pepsin digestion with Immunopure F(ab')2 purification kit (Pierce).

Quantitation of plasma viral loads

Plasma RNA was extracted using High Pure Viral RNA kit (Roche Diagnostics). Serial five-fold dilutions of RNA samples were amplified in quadruplicate by reverse transcription and nested PCR using SIVmac239 gag-specific primers to determine the end point. Plasma SIV RNA levels were calculated according to the Reed-Muench method as described previously [6]. The lower limit of detection is approximately 4×102 copies/ml.

Measurement of virus-specific neutralizing titers

Serial two-fold dilutions of heat-inactivated plasma or purified antibodies were prepared in duplicate and mixed with 10 TCID50 of SIVmac239. In each mixture, 5 µl of diluted sample was incubated with 5 µl of virus. After 45-min incubation at room temperature, each 10-µl mixture was added into 5×104 MT-4 cells/well in 96-well plates. Day 12 culture supernatants were harvested and progeny virus production was examined by ELISA for detection of SIV p27 core antigen (Beckman-Coulter) to determine 100% neutralizing endpoint. The lower limit of titration is 1[ratio]2.

Measurement of virus-specific T-cell responses

Virus-specific T-cell levels were measured by flow-cytometric analysis of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) induction as described previously [6]. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cocultured with autologous herpesvirus papio-immortalized B lymphoblastoid cell lines infected with a vesicular stomatitis virus G (VSV-G)-pseudotyped SIVGP1 for SIV-specific stimulation. The pseudotyped virus was obtained by cotransfection of COS-1 cells with a VSV-G-expression plasmid and the SIVGP1 DNA, an env- and nef-deleted simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) molecular clone DNA. Intracellular IFN-γ staining was performed using CytofixCytoperm kit (Becton Dickinson). Fluorescein isothiocianate-conjugated anti-human CD4, Peridinin chlorophyll protein-conjugated anti-human CD8, allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-human CD3, and phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human IFN-γ antibodies (Becton Dickinson) were used. Specific T-cell levels were calculated by subtracting non-specific IFN-γ+ T-cell frequencies from those after SIV-specific stimulation. Specific T-cell levels less than 100 cells per million PBMC are considered negative.

Quantitation of cell-associated viral loads

Right and left inguinal lymph nodes and right and left axillary lymph nodes were obtained from macaques by biopsy at days 7, 8, 10, and 14 post-challenge, respectively. For measurement of dendritic cell (DC)-associated viral loads, CD1c+ DCs were positively selected to over 99% purity using a macaque CD1c+ DC magnetic sorting system (Miltenyi Biotech) from CD20 lymphocytes negatively-selected from lymph nodes. CD1cCD20 cells were used for measurement of non-DC-associated viral loads. Cell-associated viral RNA was extracted using RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and quantitated by LightCycler real-time PCR system (Roche Diagnostics) using SIV gag-specific primers and probes. The lower limit of detection is approximately 1,000 copies/106 cells.

Antigen presentation assay in vitro

PBMCs obtained in the chronic phase from SIVmac239-controllers were attached to culture plates for 4 h, and adhesive cells were cultured in the presence of 50 ng/ml GM-CSF (R&D Systems) and 5 ng/ml IL-4 (R&D Systems) for 5 days to obtain CD1c+CD83+CD86+HLA-ABC+HLA-DR+ immature DCs [27]. Alternatively, CD1c+ DCs were positively selected from CD20-depleted PBMCs as described above. For antigen presentation assay, 1×105 of the in vitro-generated DCs (Exp. 1, 2, and 3) or the positively-selected CD1c+ DCs (Exp. 4) were pulsed for 17 h with 2,000 TCID50 of SIVmac239 (corresponding to 2×106 SIV RNA copies and 3 ng of SIV p27) alone or preincubated for 45 min with 1.5 mg of either control IgG, neutralizing IgG, or neutralizing F(ab')2. Autologous PBMCs were cocultured with these pulsed DCs and then subjected to measurement of specific IFN-γ induction.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by Prism software version 4.03 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Set point plasma viral loads and peripheral CD95+CD28+ central memory CD4+ T-cell counts around 3 months after challenge of the naive controls (n = 7) and NAb-immunized macaques (n = 4) were log-transformed for improvement of normality and compared by two-tailed unpaired t test with significance levels set at p<0.05. Then their geometric means with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Due to the limited number of samples for each group providing difficulty for their normality testing, the two groups were additionally compared by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for confirmation of results. No significant difference in CD95+CD28+ central memory CD4+ T-cell counts just before challenge was observed between the two groups (p = 0.68 by unpaired two-tailed t test with Welch's correction and p = 0.31 by Mann-Whitney U test) (data not shown).

Results

SIV control by post-infection passive NAb immunization

While most SIVmac239-infected naive macaques usually fail to elicit NAb responses during the early phase of infection, some acquire detectable levels of NAbs against the challenge strain in the late phase. IgG purified from plasma pools of such SIVmac239-infected macaques with NAb induction, showing in vitro SIVmac239-specific neutralizing activity of 1[ratio]16, was used for passive immunization as polyclonal anti-SIV NAbs. In the first part of this study, naive Burmese rhesus macaques were challenged intravenously with SIVmac239 followed by passive immunization with 10 ml of the polyclonal NAbs (300 mg IgG) at day 7 post-challenge (Figure 1A). Seven naive control macaques challenged with SIVmac239, including two infused with non-SIV-specific control antibodies, all failed to contain viral replication with persistent viremia (Figure 1B). These macaques showed peak plasma viral loads between days 7 and 14 post-challenge and most had set-point viral loads exceeding 1×104 SIV RNA copies/ml plasma. In contrast, four rhesus macaques passively immunized at day 7 with polyclonal NAbs showed significantly lower plasma viral RNA loads (p = 0.0033 by unpaired t test and p = 0.0061 by Mann-Whitney U test) compared with naive controls around 3 months post-challenge (Figures 1B&1C). Two of the NAb-immunized macaques, NA1 and NA4, controlled SIV replication with undetectable set-point plasma viremia. Thus, post-infection passive immunization of macaques with polyclonal NAbs had a significant suppressive effect on set-point viral replication.

Figure 1
Effect of post-challenge passive NAb immunization on primary SIV infection.

Immune parameters in NAb-immunized macaques

Plasma NAb responses in the NAb-immunized macaques were detected marginally at day 10 post-infection but became undetectable within one week after the passive NAb immunization (Figure 1D), implying that the NAbs were rapidly exhausted for virus clearance. None elicited detectable de novo NAb responses past then. In the naive controls, no SIVmac239-specific NAbs were detected throughout the course. This discrepancy between the transient NAb detection and the persistent viremia control in the NAb-immunized macaques differed from previously-reported, dose-dependent establishment of sterile protection from CXCR4-tropic SHIV infection by pre-challenge passive NAb immunization [18][21].

Difference in total CD4+ T-cell counts was not found throughout the course between the two groups (Figure 2A). Reductions in peripheral CD95+ CD28+ central memory CD4+ T-cell counts [28][29] were observed in the naive controls after SIV challenge (Figure 2B). The NAb-immunized macaques, however, showed significantly higher central memory CD4+ T-cell counts around 3 months post-challenge than those in the naive controls (p = 0.0066 by unpaired t test and p = 0.0061 by Mann-Whitney U test) (Figures 2B&2C), suggesting amelioration of central memory CD4+ T-cell loss in the early phase of SIV infection by transient NAb responses around week 1 post-challenge. All of these NAb-immunized macaques showed efficient virus-specific CD8+ T-cell induction at week 8 (Figure 3), although difference in the levels between the two groups was not significant, implying its possible enrollment in the observed viral control.

Figure 2
Central memory CD4+ T-cell counts in naive controls and NAb-immunized macaques.
Figure 3
SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell frequencies at week 8 post-challenge in naive controls and NAb-immunized macaques.

Post-infection passive NAb immunization in vaccinees

Our previous trial of a DNA-prime/SeV-Gag vector-boost vaccine in Burmese rhesus macaques has shown vaccine-based, NAb-independent control of SIVmac239 replication, suggesting association of MHC-I haplotype with this control [6], [30]. We then examined possible synergy of post-challenge passive NAb immunization with the prophylactic CTL-based vaccination in suppression of SIV replication in two groups of macaques possessing MHC-I haplotype 90-088-Ij and 90-120-Ia, respectively (Figure 4A). In the former group of macaques possessing 90-088-Ij, vaccinees failed to control SIV replication even after passive NAb immunization (Figure 4B). In the latter group of macaques possessing 90-120-Ia, all 4 vaccinees without NAb immunization controlled SIVmac239 replication and had undetectable plasma viral loads after week 8 post-challenge (Figure 4B). All of them rapidly selected for a mutation escaping from Gag206-216 epitope-specific CTL by week 5, suggesting a strong selective pressure on the virus by this CTL [6]. As for the two vaccinees VA2 and VA3 infused with NAbs, plasma viremia became undetectable by week 5 and rapid selection of CTL escape mutation was not observed (data not shown). SIV-specific CD8+ T-cell frequencies at week 2 in the NAb-immunized vaccinees VA2 and VA3 were comparable with the vaccinees without NAb immunization, while SIV-specific CD4+ T-cell induction at week 2 was observed in just one (V5) of the four vaccinees without NAb but in both of the NAb-immunized vaccinees (Figure 4C). These results suggest, even in the NAb-immunized vaccinees, a dominant effect of vaccine-induced cellular immune responses on control of SIV replication, although implying a possibility of NAb-mediated augmentation of CTL vaccine-based viral control.

Figure 4
Effect of post-challenge passive NAb immunization in vaccinees.

Antibody-mediated virion uptake by DCs and T cell priming

In order to assess the possibility of altered virus distribution by NAbs, CD1c+ DCs were isolated from peripheral lymph nodes of unvaccinated, SIVmac239-challenged macaques before and after passive NAb immunization, and DC-associated SIV RNA levels were quantified at the initial stage of infection. In three naive control macaques, accumulation of viral RNA to CD1c+ DCs was undetectable at days 7, 8, and 10 post-challenge but became detectable at day 14 (Figure 5A). This elevation of DC-associated viral loads following peak viremia was consistent with previous immunohistochemistry reports on SIV and HIV-2 challenge experiments [31][32]. In marked contrast, both of macaques NA3 and NA4 immunized with NAbs at day 7 post-challenge showed immediate accumulation of viral RNA in CD1c+ DCs at day 8 (one day after NAb immunization), suggesting antibody-mediated virion accumulation to DCs in vivo. Cell-associated viral loads in CD1cCD20 non-DCs were at comparable levels between the two groups, indicating that the rapid increase in DC-associated viral loads after NAb immunization was not due to changes in viral loads in lymph nodes.

Figure 5
Antibody-mediated SIV uptake by DCs and T cell priming.

Then an in vitro antigen presentation assay was performed to assume whether the early viral RNA accumulation in DCs could represent a correlation to T cell priming. DCs prepared from peripheral blood of macaques that controlled SIVmac239 replication were pulsed with antibody-neutralized SIV, and autologous PBMCs were cocultured with these pulsed DCs for measurement of specific IFN-γ induction. In all four sets of experiments, efficient IFN-γ induction in CD4+ T cells was observed after stimulation by DCs pulsed with SIV preincubated with NAb but not by DCs pulsed with SIV alone, SIV preincubated with control antibodies, or SIV preincubated with Fc-depleted neutralizing F(ab')2 (Figure 5B). Efficient IFN-γ induction in CD8+ T cells was not observed even after coculture with NAb-preincubated SIV-pulsed DCs except for one (Exp. 4). Overall, augmentation of virus-specific T-cell stimulation was observed by the coexistence of NAbs, suggesting their involvement in antigen presentation.

Discussion

The present study showed suppression of primary SIV replication by passive NAb immunization post-infection, suggesting a possibility of HIV control by potent antibody induction during the acute phase of infection. It reversely follows that its absence may be involved in an increase in the burden of acute infectious viral loads and abrogation of virus-specific cellular immune responses, leading to initial control failure in HIV infections.

While this study does not exclude possibilities of additional antibody-mediated protective mechanisms such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity or recently-reported complement virolysis [33], the non-sterile but consistent viral control at the set point by passive NAb immunization despite only transient detection of NAb responses during the acute phase coheres with involvement of cellular immune responses in this control [27], [34][36]. Thus, results may provide additional interpretations to previous NAb passive immunization studies [14], [16][21], which have mostly utilized CXCR4-tropic SHIV-challenged macaques and shown sterile protection by high titers of pre-challenge or very early post-challenge NAbs.

A technical confinement of this study is the use of polyclonal antibodies which may include not only NAbs but also non-neutralizing anti-SIV antibodies for passive immunization. However, our finding of primary SIV control by post-infection passive immunization with the anti-SIV inoculums with neutralizing activity presents significant evidence suggesting that potent antibodies post-infection can contribute to control of primary immunodeficiency virus infection. Whether neutralizing activity is required for the enhanced SIV control by passive immunization remains to be assessed in future studies. Our in vitro results suggest a possibility of virus-specific CD4+ T-cell activation by NAbs, and neutralizing activity may contribute to protection of these virus-specific CD4+ T cells from SIV trans-infection via DCs [37][38], possibly counteracting the abrogation of the optimal concert of adaptive immunity between CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells usually observed in the natural course of pathogenic immunodeficiency virus infection [23], [25], [39]. The possibility of failure in antibody-mediated priming of effective cellular immune responses by preexisting vaccine-induced dominant responses may account for lack of viral control in the NAb-immunized vaccinee possessing MHC-I haplotype 90-088-Ij.

Despite suggested technical difficulties in achieving requisite neutralizing titers for sterile HIV protection by prophylactic vaccination, our results indicate a possibility of non-sterile HIV control by secondary expansion of prophylactic vaccine-induced, sub-sterile titers of NAbs post-infection, providing a rationale of vaccine-based NAb induction for primary HIV control. More understanding of the mechanism may lead to a more certain rationale for careful induction of NAbs and CTLs by vaccination, maybe potentially capable of synergistic HIV-1 control.

Acknowledgments

The animal experiments were conducted through the Cooperative Research Program in Tsukuba Primate Research Center, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation with the help of the Corporation for Production and Research of Laboratory Primates. We thank DNAVEC corp. for providing Sendai virus vectors; K. Ishikawa, T. Nakasone, K. Mori, F. Ono, K. Komatsuzaki, A. Hiyaoka, H. Ogawa, K. Oto, N. Ageyama, H. Akari, and K. Terao for assistance in animal experiments; and C. Moriya, T. Tsukamoto, A. Kato, M. Miyazawa, M. Yasunami, A. Kimura, T. Sata, N. Yamamoto, T. Kurata, A. Nomoto, and Y. Nagai for their help.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, grants from the Japan Health Sciences Foundation, and grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan.

References

1. Koup RA, Safrit JT, Cao Y, Andrews CA, McLeod G, et al. Temporal association of cellular immune responses with the initial control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 syndrome. J Virol. 1994;68:4650–4655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Borrow P, Lewicki H, Hahn BH, Shaw GM, Oldstone MB. Virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity associated with control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 1994;68:6103–6110. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Matano T, Shibata R, Siemon C, Connors M, Lane HC, et al. Administration of an anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody interferes with the clearance of chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus during primary infections of rhesus macaques. J Virol. 1998;72:164–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Schmitz JE, Kuroda MJ, Santra S, Sasseville VG, Simon MA, et al. Control of viremia in simian immunodeficiency virus infection by CD8+ lymphocytes. Science. 1999;283:857–860. [PubMed]
5. Jin X, Bauer DE, Tuttleton SE, Lewin S, Gettie A, et al. Dramatic rise in plasma viremia after CD8(+) T cell depletion in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J Exp Med. 1999;189:991–998. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Matano T, Kobayashi M, Igarashi H, Takeda A, Nakamura H, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-based control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication in a preclinical AIDS vaccine trial. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1709–1718. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Goulder PJ, Watkins DI. HIV and SIV CTL escape: implications for vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:630–640. [PubMed]
8. Burton DR, Desrosiers RC, Doms RW, Koff WC, Kwong PD, et al. HIV vaccine design and the neutralizing antibody problem. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:233–236. [PubMed]
9. Kwong PD, Doyle ML, Casper DJ, Cicala C, Leavitt SA, et al. HIV-1 evades antibody-mediated neutralization through conformational masking of receptor-binding sites. Nature. 2002;420:678–682. [PubMed]
10. Wei X, Decker JM, Wang S, Hui H, Kappes JC, Wu X, et al. Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1. Nature. 2003;422:307–312. [PubMed]
11. Hangartner L, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H. Antiviral antibody responses: the two extremes of a wide spectrum. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:231–243. [PubMed]
12. Richman DD, Wrin T, Little SJ, Petropoulos CJ. Rapid evolution of the neutralizing antibody response to HIV type 1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4144–4149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Trkola A, Kuster H, Rusert P, Joos B, Fischer M, et al. Delay of HIV-1 rebound after cessation of antiretroviral therapy through passive transfer of human neutralizing antibodies. Nat Med. 2005;11:615–622. [PubMed]
14. Haigwood NL, Watson A, Sutton WF, McClure J, Lewis A, et al. Passive immune globulin therapy in the SIV/macaque model: early intervention can alter disease profile. Immunol Lett. 1996;51:107–114. [PubMed]
15. Poignard P, Sabbe R, Picchio GR, Wang M, Gulizia RJ, et al. Neutralizing antibodies have limited effects on the control of established HIV-1 infection in vivo. Immunity. 1999;10:431–438. [PubMed]
16. Nishimura Y, Igarashi T, Haigwood NL, Sadjadpour R, Donau OK, et al. Transfer of neutralizing IgG to macaques 6 h but not 24 h after SHIV infection confers sterilizing protection: implications for HIV-1 vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15131–15136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Mascola JR, Lewis MG, Stiegler G, Harris D, VanCott TC, et al. Protection of macaques against pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus 89.6PD by passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies. J Virol. 1999;73:4009–4018. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Shibata R, Igarashi T, Haigwood N, Buckler-White A, Ogert R, et al. Neutralizing antibody directed against the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein can completely block HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus infections of macaque monkeys. Nat Med. 1999;5:204–210. [PubMed]
19. Mascola JR, Stiegler G, VanCott TC, Katinger H, Carpenter CB, et al. Protection of macaques against vaginal transmission of a pathogenic HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus by passive infusion of neutralizing antibodies. Nat Med. 2000;6:207–210. [PubMed]
20. Parren PW, Marx PA, Hessell AJ, Luckay A, Harouse J, et al. Antibody protects macaques against vaginal challenge with a pathogenic R5 simian/human immunodeficiency virus at serum levels giving complete neutralization in vitro. J Virol. 2001;75:8340–8347. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Veazey RS, Shattock RJ, Pope M, Lirijan JC, Jones J, et al. Prevention of virus transmission to macaque monkeys by a vaginally applied monoclonal antibody to HIV-1 gp120. Nat Med. 2003;9:343–346. [PubMed]
22. Nishimura Y, Igarashi T, Donau OK, Buckler-White A, Buckler C, et al. Highly pathogenic SHIVs and SIVs target different CD4+ T cell subsets in rhesus monkeys, explaining their divergent clinical courses. Proc Natl Aca Sci. U S A. 2004;101:12324–12329. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Mattapallil JJ, Douek DC, Hill B, Nishimura Y, Martin M, et al. Massive infection and loss of memory CD4+ T cells in multiple tissues during acute SIV infection. Nature. 2005;434:1093–1097. [PubMed]
24. Li Q, Duan L, Estes JD, Ma ZM, Routke T, et al. Peak SIV replication in resting memory CD4+ T cells depletes gut lamina propria CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2005;434:1148–1152. [PubMed]
25. Picker LJ, Watkins DI. HIV pathogenesis: the first cut is the deepest. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:430–432. [PubMed]
26. Arguello JR, Little AM, Bohan E, Goldman JM, Marsh SG, et al. High resolution HLA class I typing by reference strand-mediated conformation analysis (RSCA). Tissue Antigens. 1998;52:57–66. [PubMed]
27. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Exp Med. 1994;179:1109–1118. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Pitcher CJ, Hagen SI, Walker JM, Lum R, Mitchell BL, et al. Development and homeostasis of T cell memory in rhesus macaques. J Immunol. 2002;168:29–43. [PubMed]
29. Letvin NL, Mascola JR, Sun Y, Gorgone DA, Buzby AP, et al. Preserved CD4+ central memory T cells and survival in vaccinated SIV-challenged monkeys. Science. 2006;312:1530–1533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Kawada M, Igarashi H, Takeda A, Tsukamoto T, Yamamoto H, et al. Involvement of multiple epitope-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses in vaccine-based control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication in rhesus macaques. J Virol. 2006;80:1949–1958. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Chakrabarti L, Isola P, Cumont MC, Claessens-Maire MA, Hurtrel M, et al. Early stages of simian immunodeficiency virus infection in lymph nodes. Evidence for high viral load and successive populations of target cells. Am J Pathol. 1994;144:1226–1237. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Eitner F, Cui Y, Grouard-Vogel G, Hudkins KL, Schmidt A, et al. Rapid shift from virally infected cells to germinal center-retained virus after HIV-2 infection of macaques. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1197–1207. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Huber M, Fischer M, Misselwitz B, Manrique A, Kuster H, et al. Complement lysis activity in autologous plasma is associated with lower viral loads during the acute phase of HIV-1 infection. PLoS Medicine. 2006;3:e441. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Regnault A, Lankar D, Lacabanne V, Rodriguez A, Thery C, et al. Fcgamma receptor-mediated induction of dendritic cell maturation and major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigen presentation after immune complex internalization. J Exp Med. 1999;189:371–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Schuurhuis DH, Ioan-Facsinav A, Nagelkerken B, van Schip JJ, Sedlik C, et al. Antigen-antibody immune complexes empower dendritic cells to efficiently prime specific CD8+ CTL responses in vivo. J Immunol. 2002;168:2240–2246. [PubMed]
36. Thomas PG, Brown SA, Yue W, So J, Webby RJ, et al. An unexpected antibody response to an engineered influenza virus modifies CD8+ T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2764–2769. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Frankel SS, Steinman RM, Michael NL, Kim SR, Bhardwaj N, et al. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies block human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of dendritic cells and transmission to T cells. J Virol. 1998;72:9788–9794. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Lore K, Smed-Sorensen A, Vasudevan J, Mascola JR, Koup RA. Myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells transfer HIV-1 preferentially to antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med. 2005;201:2023–2033. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Castellino F, Germain RN. Cooperation between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells: When, Where, and How. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:519–540. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...