• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bloodOriginal ArticleBlood JournalCurrent IssueAbout BloodSubmissionsSubscriptionsContact UsASH Homepage
Blood. Jun 1, 2007; 109(11): 5002–5010.
Prepublished online Feb 20, 2007. doi:  10.1182/blood-2006-03-012542
PMCID: PMC1885531
Neoplasia

CD28-mediated regulation of multiple myeloma cell proliferation and survival

Abstract

Although interactions with bone marrow stromal cells are essential for multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival, the specific molecular and cellular elements involved are largely unknown, due in large part to the complexity of the bone marrow microenvironment itself. The T-cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is also expressed on normal and malignant plasma cells, and CD28 expression in MM correlates significantly with poor prognosis and disease progression. In contrast to T cells, activation and function of CD28 in myeloma cells is largely undefined. We have found that direct activation of myeloma cell CD28 by anti-CD28 mAb alone induces activation of PI3K and NFκB, suppresses MM cell proliferation, and protects against serum starvation and dexamethasone (dex)–induced cell death. Coculture with dendritic cells (DCs) expressing the CD28 ligands CD80 and CD86 also elicits CD28-mediated effects on MM survival and proliferation, and DCs appear to preferentially localize within myeloma infiltrates in primary patient samples. Our findings suggest a previously undescribed myeloma/DC cell-cell interaction involving CD28 that may play an important role in myeloma cell survival within the bone marrow stroma. These data also point to CD28 as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of MM.

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable clonal B lymphoid neoplasm of plasma cells, second only to non-Hodgkin lymphoma in incidence.1 Despite significant initial responses to chemotherapy, more than 90% of patients with MM relapse with resistant disease,2 underscoring the need to identify novel therapeutic targets that affect myeloma survival and resistance pathways. Given that MM cells are critically dependent on normal elements of the bone marrow stroma for cell growth and survival, these interactions are attractive targets. One such interaction is stromal production of soluble growth factors, such as IL-6 and TRANCE.1,3 Another important set of interactions involves direct myeloma cell contact with extracellular matrix (ECM) and/or stromal cells. Such direct contact up-regulates stromal cell IL-6 and VEGF production, induces NFκB signaling, drops myeloma cells out of cell cycle, and enhances resistance to chemotherapy.46 However, the specific molecular (eg, integrins4,7) and cellular components (eg, osteoclasts8) of these direct interactions within the complex bone marrow microenvironment are only beginning to be described. As important, the characteristic progression of myeloma to stromal independence marks a clinically worse disease,9 yet the mechanisms that underlie this transition are also poorly understood.

Identification of prosurvival receptors typically expressed on myeloma cells may point to the stromal cells expressing the receptor ligands. One potential receptor is CD28. CD28 has a restricted lineage expression, found predominantly on T cells but also on normal plasma cells, primary myeloma isolates, and myeloma cell lines at levels comparable with T cells.1013 In T cells, CD28 receptor activation occurs following binding to its ligands, CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2), which are expressed predominantly on professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and in particular on dendritic cells (DCs).14 The signaling pathways downstream of the CD28 receptor in T cells include PI-3 kinase → PDK1 → Akt and Vav → Rac1/Cdc42 → MEKK (both of which regulate NFκB activation),15 and, importantly, in myeloma cells, PI3K/Akt signaling transduces the antiapoptotic effects of IL-6 and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1),16 and for IGF-1, involves sustained activation of NFκB.17 Functionally, CD28 delivers the costimulatory signal that in conjunction with T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling results in augmented T-cell proliferation, effector function,18,19 and enhanced survival via up-regulation of the antiapoptotic gene bcl-xL20 and more efficient glucose metabolism.21

In contrast to T cells, little is known about CD28 function in myeloma cells. Clinically, however, CD28 expression highly correlates with myeloma disease progression, such that high CD28 expression is seen in 26% of newly diagnosed myelomas, 59% of medullary recurrences, 93% of extramedullary relapses, and 100% of secondary plasma cell leukemias (including nearly all the human and murine MM cell lines).12,22 Moreover, myeloma cell expression of CD28 in newly diagnosed patients is a major prognostic predictor of poor clinical outcome following high-dose chemotherapy.23,24 These clinical findings suggest that CD28 expression helps these MM cells better survive treatment and result in their selective outgrowth. In addition, the possibility that CD28 is involved in the progression to stroma-independent MM is supported by observations that primary CD28+ myelomas coexpress CD86 (10 of 10 patient samples in Robillard et al12) and that CD86+ myelomas have a significantly poorer prognosis.25 The possibility of autocrine CD28-CD86 activation is supported by some,13 but not all,26 in vitro studies. Other functional studies of CD28 activation in MM cell lines have been equivocal.10,13 CD28 activation does not induce IL-6 secretion in MM cells22,26 like it does in T cells,27 but does up-regulate expression of the proangiogenic chemokine IL-8.22 Direct evidence of a prosurvival role for CD28 in myeloma cells has not been reported, although such a role in normal plasma cells is indirectly suggested by our previous observations that CD28 knockout mice have markedly diminished serum immunoglobulin levels,18,28 including T-independent antibody responses.29 Conversely, an anti-CD28 mAb recently developed by Qiu et al inhibits MM cell line proliferation and induces some morphologic aspects of apoptosis; whether this is due to an activating or blocking effect of the antibody was not determined.30

If CD28 is supporting myeloma cell survival, its activation in vivo is likely to be via direct cell contact with a B7+ cell within the microenvironment. These include other CD86+ myeloma cells and/or professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) expressing CD80/CD86 (B cells, monocyte/macrophages, DCs). Consistent with this, DCs and other myeloid APCs actively infiltrate implanted plasmacytomas in murine models,31 and DCs are readily found throughout myeloma infiltrates in patient bone marrow biopsies.32 Altogether, these has led us to examine whether CD28 can transduce survival signals to myeloma cells, and whether MM CD28 is activated through cell-cell contact with other B7+ cells.

Materials and methods

The University of Miami institutional review board (IRB) approval has been obtained for the sample collection protocols for obtaining the primary myeloma samples.

Cells, reagents, and culture

RPMI 8226, U266, K562, and KG1 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The MM.1S cell line was the gift of Dr S. Rosen (Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Chicago, IL). Early passage cells (ie, in continuous culture for less than 2 months) were used for all experiments, and all cell lines were more than 85% viable at the beginning of all experiments. Primary myeloma cells were obtained from bone marrow aspirates from patients with recurring myeloma (under IRB-approved protocols) and purified by CD138 immunomagnetic selection (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The agonistic anti-CD28 mAb 9.333 was either used as soluble antibody (1 μg/mL) or immobilized to Dynal beads (Lake Success, NY) and used at the indicated beads per cell ratio.34 For the serum-starvation experiments, myeloma cell lines were cultured in media (RPMI 1640) without serum with or without anti-CD28 mAb, and viability was determined by PI/annexin V staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. For dex treatment experiments, myeloma cell lines were cultured in 0.1% FBS with or without anti-CD28 mAb plus 100 μM dex, and viability was assessed after 72 hours by PI/annexin V staining. For the primary myeloma cell survival, total viable cell numbers were enumerated by quadruplicate cell counts using trypan blue.

Cell proliferation assays were done in 0.1% FCS. [methyl-3H] thymidine (0.5 μCi [0.0185 MBq]/well) was added for the final 18 hours of culture, and incorporation was measured using the Beta Plate scintillation counting system (Wallac Inc, Gaithersburg, MD).35 All conditions were performed in triplicates, and data are represented as the mean counts ± 1 SD.

Myeloma-DC coculture

K562 and KG1 were differentiated into dendritic cells/myeloid APCs as previously described.35,36 Briefly, cells were cultured in media alone or differentiated for 5 to 7 days with PMA (10 ng/mL; Sigma, St Louis, MO) with or without TNF-α (10 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Primary monocytes were enriched from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) of healthy donors (in IRB-approved protocols) by plastic adherence and differentiated into DCs using GM-CSF (1000 U/mL; Immunex, Seattle, WA) and IL-4 (1000 U/mL; R&D Systems) for 8 days with or without TNF-α (20 ng/mL) for the last 4 days of culture.37 DCs were then washed, irradiated at 3000 R (30 Gy) (KG1; monocyte-derived DCs) or 12000 R (120 Gy) (K562; 137Cs), and seeded into round-bottom wells alone or with myeloma cells at the cell numbers indicated. Cocultures were done in media plus 10% FCS for the proliferation assays. After 24 hours, wells were pulsed with [3H] TdR, and incorporation was measured for the next 18 hours of culture using the Beta Plate (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD) scintillation counting system and expressed as means ± standard deviation of triplicate wells. Where indicated, hCD28-Ig (R&D Systems) was added to the DCs 1 hour before addition of MM cells.

The coculture viability experiments were done in 0.1% FCS. Myeloma cells were cultured alone, or 1:1 with irradiated, undifferentiated DC precursors or differentiated DCs, treated for 72 hours with 100 μM dex, and analyzed by FACS for 7AAD (dead cells; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and CD28 expression (MM cells).

Flow cytometry

Cells were stained as previously reported35 with anti-CD28, CD80, CD86 mAb, or isotype control (Immunotech, Westbrook, ME). Cells were also stained with CTLA4-Ig (or isotype-matched human Ig) and goat anti–human Ig PE. A total of 10 000 live cells were analyzed by flow cytometry on a Coulter XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) using software supplied by the manufacturer.

For cell-cycle analysis, 8226 were labeled with CSFE and cocultured at a 1:1 ratio (2 × 104 cells) with either undifferentiated K562 or K562 differentiated with PMA for 24 hours, permeabilized, and stained with propidium iodide (PI) in the presence of RNase A.38 Cell-cycle analysis of CSFE+ cells was conducted on a BD LSR1 (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) collection of viable cells through the G0/G1 (M2), S (M3), and G2/M (M4) gates. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments.

Western blot

Western blot analysis was performed as previously described.35 Briefly, cell lysates were made from 8226 or U266 cells that were cultured with or without anti-CD28 mAb for 24 hours. Cell lysates were made, protein levels were quantitated by using the Micro BCA reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE (4% stacking/10% resolving), electroblotted to nitrocellulose, and probed with antibodies specific for Bcl-xL,20 IκBα, or Rel B actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The proteins were visualized by chemoluminescent detection (ECL; Amersham Life Sciences, Aylesbury, United Kingdom).

PI3K p85 ELISA assay

PI3K activation was assayed by Fast Activated cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (FACE; Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, 17 000 cells were seeded into poly-L-lysine–coated 96-well culture plates and serum-starved for 16 hours. Cells were then treated with 1 μg/mL anti-CD28 mAb 9.3 for the indicated times, fixed, and incubated with anti–phospho-p85 antibodies. The ELISA assay was developed and read as per the manufacturer's instructions.

EMSA

Electromobility shift assays (EMSAs) were done for NFκB family members as previously described.36 Briefly, 8226 or U266 cells were cultured with or without anti-CD28 mAb for 24 hours. Nuclear extracts were made, and equal amounts of protein were incubated with 32P-labeled primer containing consensus NFκB-binding sites (GAT CCA ACG GCA GGG GAA TTC CCC TCT CCT TA) and separated on 4% polyacrylamide gels. For supershift assays, samples were first incubated with anti-Rel B, anti-p50, anti-p65, and anti–c-Rel (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Samples were visualized by autoradiography.

Immunohistochemistry

Biopsies of bone marrow and extramedullary plasmacytomas were obtained from patients with refractory/recurring MM as part of IRB-approved protocols and following informed consent. Consecutive sections were then stained with anti-CD138 (myeloma; R&D Systems), antifascin (D; Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ), anti-CD28 (R&D Systems), or hematoxylin/eosin. Photomicrographs were taken on a Leica DMIRB microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with a Coolsnap camera (Roper Scientific Ottobrun, Germany) controlled by MetaMorph v4.0 software (Molecular Devices, Downington, PA).

Statistical analysis

Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Student t test.

Results

Myeloma cells express CD28 and CD86

As seen in Figure 1A (top panels), CD28 is expressed on 3 human myeloma cell lines (RPMI 8226 [8226], MM.1S, and U266) at levels slightly lower than the cytotoxic T-cell line YT. CD28 is also expressed on primary MM cells purified from bone marrow aspirates of patients with recurring disease (Figure 1A; bottom panels), and also on the infiltrating myeloma cells from patients with extramedullary intramuscular plasmacytomas (Figure 1B). As suggested by previous studies, all 3 MM cell lines also coexpressed CD86 but not CD80 (Figure 1C), which is more clearly seen using indirect staining with CTLA4-Ig.

Figure 1
CD28 and CD86 expression. (A) CD28. The indicated cells were stained with anti-CD28 PE (filled histogram) or isotype control (open histogram) and analyzed by FACS. Top panels show cell lines. Bottom panels show primary myeloma isolates. Primary myeloma ...

CD28 triggers PI3K signaling in myeloma cells

In T cells, 1 pathway downstream of the CD28 receptor is PI3K/Akt activation,39 and in myeloma cells the prosurvival effects of IGF-1 are transduced through PI3K/Akt signaling and downstream NFκB activation.16,17 To assess whether CD28 activation can also trigger this pathway in MM cells, PI3K activation was characterized via ELISA-based measurement of the phosphorylated (activated) p85 subunit of PI3K following activation with the anti-CD28 mAb 9.3. As can be seen in Figure 2, CD28 activation results in rapid (by 5 minutes) detection of phospho-p85 in all 3 MM cell lines, with sustained levels out to 24 hours. This is consistent with previous studies demonstrating association of p85 to the CD28 receptor in myeloma cells.26

Figure 2
CD28 signaling induced PI3K activation. The indicated MM cells were treated with 1 μg/mL of agonistic anti-CD28 mAb 9.3 for different time course and fixed. Levels of phosphorylated PI3K were assayed by FACE PI3 Kinase p85 ELISA kit (Active Motif) ...

Activation of downstream NFκB signaling

To determinewhether CD28-induced PI3K triggered downstream NFκB signaling, we initially sought evidence for IκBα degradation. As seen in Figure 3A, antibody-mediated activation of CD28 alone results in reduction of cellular IκBα in both 8226 and U266. The antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL is not up-regulated, consistent with previous reports that CD28 activation alone does not up-regulate this expression in T cells.20 To more directly assess CD28-induced NFκB signaling, levels of free nuclear NFκB dimers were measured by electromobility gel shift assay. CD28 activation (using either bead bound or soluble mAb [not shown]) increases total nuclear NFκB binding in both U266 and 8226 (Figure 3B). Supershift assays for NFκB family members demonstrate increased levels of p50, p65, Rel B, and c-Rel, suggesting that both the canonical (p65, p50/p52 homodimers) and noncanonical (RelB) pathways are being activated. In contrast, binding of CD86 with CD28-Ig has no effect on NFκB signaling (Figure 3C), indicating that 9.3's effects are not paradoxically due to the blocking of a myeloma CD28–myeloma CD86 interaction. Finally, we and others have previously shown that NFκB signaling plays the primary role in up-regulating expression of the NFκB family member Rel B,40 and similarly find that CD28 activation induces Rel B expression in myeloma cell lines (Figure 3D). Together, these findings indicate that CD28 activation by itself results in NFκB signaling in MM cells.

Figure 3
Effect of CD28 activation on NFκB activation. (A) IκBα and Bcl-xL expression. 8226 or U266 cells were cultured with or without anti-CD28 mAb beads as indicated, and analyzed by Western blot using Abs specific for IκBα, ...

CD28 downmodulates myeloma cell proliferation

The ability of CD28 to costimulate T-cell proliferation and survival can be segregated into 2 independent downstream signaling pathways, with PI3K being essential for survival while factors binding the C-terminal proline motifs for proliferation and cytokine responses.41 We next assessed the effect CD28 activation on myeloma cell proliferation, which were done in low FCS conditions (0.1%) as normal serum contains IGF-1 that may mask a CD28 signal. In comparison with 8226, U266, and MM.1S cultured with control (uncoated) beads, cell proliferation was significantly suppressed by culture with 9.3-coated beads. In comparison, the 9.3-coated beads had no effect on the CD28 cell line K562 (Figure 4).

Figure 4
CD28 activation inhibits myeloma cell proliferation. 8226, U266, and MM.1S (2 × 105) were cocultured with uncoated beads (beads alone) or 9.3-coated beads. K562 (CD28 control; 2 × 104) was cultured in media alone or 9.3-coated ...

CD28 activation enhances myeloma cell survival

Prosurvival factors IGF-1 and IL-6 activate NFκB,42 suggesting that CD28 may also support myeloma cell survival (we [data not shown] and others22 have found that CD28 does not induce IL-6 secretion in MM cells). As serum contains sufficient IGF-1 to prevent apoptosis,43 we asked whether withdrawal of serum induces cell death in 8226 and MM.1S, and whether CD28 activation could provide substitute survival signals. As seen in Figure 5A, serum starvation results in substantial cell death in both 8226 and MM.1S by 48 hours that could be abrogated in part by the addition of anti-CD28 mAb. The data does not quite reach statistical significance, but is clearly trending toward improved survival with CD28 activation.

Figure 5
CD28 activation protects against induced cell death. (A) Serum starvation. The indicated myeloma cells were cultured in media (RPMI 1640) without serum (SS), or medium without serum plus soluble anti-CD28 mAb (SS+CD28). After 48 hours, viability was determined ...

We next examined whether CD28 activation could protect against death induced by dex, a more defined death signal and clinically relevant agent. To minimize the possibility of serum IGF-1 masking a CD28 prosurvival signal, we conducted these assays in low-serum conditions (0.1%, which alone did not affect the viability of our cell lines). As seen in Figure 5B, dex effectively killed all 3 MM cell lines, and anti-CD28 mAb–mediated activation resulted in significant protection against this dex-induced death.

Whether CD28 activation also had prosurvival effects in primary myeloma cells was examined in cells purified from 3 patient samples (recurring disease), with the resulting cell populations more than 90% positive for the plasma cell marker CD138 (all 3 samples were CD28+). The purified MM cells were then cultured in 10% serum (Figure 5C; left, for patient sample 1) or without serum (Figure 5C; right) with or without anti-CD28 mAb for 24 hours. Serum starvation was used, as all the patients were clinically dex resistant. While primary myeloma cells fared reasonably well in 10% FCS (and were largely unaffected by anti-CD28 mAb, which also demonstrates that the mAb was not inducing proliferation), there was a considerable loss of viable cells when serum was withdrawn. Consistent with our cell-line findings, activation of CD28 substantially improved myeloma cell survival.

DCs associate with myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo

Biologically relevant activation of CD28 in myeloma cells likely occurs the same way it does in T cells, namely by direct cell-cell contact with CD80/CD86 cells (especially APCs). Given that previous studies have found DCs in myeloma/plasmacytoma infiltrates,32,44 we first examined whether DCs could be preferentially found within myeloma infiltrates in patient bone marrow biopsies. CD138 staining was used to identify myeloma cells, and fascin staining plus morphology was used to identify DCs.32 Previous studies have found that the expression of the actin-bundling protein fascin is very specific for DCs in paraffin-embedded tissue,4547 and superior to HLA-DR or S100 staining for distinguishing DCs from tissue macrophages.48 We found that 4 of 5 patients with recurring myeloma had numerous fascin+ cells with DC morphology within the CD138+ myeloma cell infiltrates, while the fifth patient (no. 90) had fewer but detectable numbers of DCs (Table 1). These fascin+ cells were predominantly localized within the CD138+ cell infiltrates, as noninfiltrated areas of bone marrow within the same marrow section had significantly fewer fascin+ cells (except for patient no. 90, who had the same low number in both areas). Figure 6 demonstrates the numerous fascin+ cell processes and less frequent cell bodies (right panel) that could be readily found interdigitating between CD138+ myeloma cells (left panel). Because fascin expression positively correlates with DC maturation,48 these findings suggest that myeloma-infiltrating DCs have the high CD80/CD86 expression typical of mature DCs. Consistent with this, CD83 staining yields similar findings (not shown).

Figure 6
DCs physically interact with myeloma cells. Bone marrow biopsy from patient 88 with recurring MM was stained for CD138 for myeloma cells (brown-staining cells; left panel; magnification, 40×/0.55 NA N PLAN objective) or fascin for DCs (brown-staining ...
Table 1
Fascin+ cells within CD138+ cell-infiltrated and noninfiltrated areas

Coculture with DCs modulates myeloma cell proliferation and survival

To characterize the possible effects of DC interaction on myeloma cells, we initially used myeloid DCs derived from human CD34+ leukemia cell lines (KG136 and K56235). Cell-line–derived DCs are a more homogenous population than primary monocyte-derived DCs, with less variability due to progenitor purity, maturation differences, etc. We and others have also shown that these myeloid blasts are not immunostimulatory when undifferentiated, but when differentiated with cytokines or phorbol esters (PMA), result in APCs that have characteristic DC markers (MHC I and II, CD40, CD80, CD86, and CD83), expression of DC-specific molecular markers (eg, DC-CK1, DC-STAMP), and unique DC function (eg, the ability to cross-present antigen, potently activate T cells to a significantly greater degree compared with normal monocytes, etc).35,36,36,4955 We first characterized the effect of DCs on myeloma cell proliferation. Proliferation of 8226 (Figure 7A; left panel) and U266 (Figure 7A; right panel) was not affected when cocultured with irradiated, undifferentiated K562. However, similar to activation with anti-CD28 mAb, coculture with K562 differentiated to DCs by PMA or PMA plus TNF-α (TNF addition drives further DC maturation) significantly downmodulated the proliferation of 8226 and U266 proliferation. KG1 yielded the same results (Figure 7D). It is unlikely that this decrease is due to residual PMA carryover, as PMA is not detected in other sensitive assays (eg, T-cell proliferation), and that PMA alone has no effect on 8226 or U266 proliferation (data not shown; Zhang et al26). Initial cell-cycle analysis of 8226 suggests the inhibition of proliferation is via a G0/G1 arrest when cultured with K562-derived DCs, but not with undifferentiated K562 (Figure 7B). To formally exclude the induction of MM cell death as the cause of decreased proliferation, CSFE-labeled 8226 was assayed for cell viability (by PI staining) after coculture with K562-derived DCs. After 24 hours of coculture there are very few PI+ dead cells in either the CFSE+ 8226 or CFSE K562 DC populations (Figure 7C).

Figure 7
Coculture with DCs downmodulates MM proliferation and enhances survival. (A) Proliferation. K562 were cultured in media alone (K562m; Km), or differentiated with PMA (K562p or Kp) or PMA plus TNF-α (K562 P+T or Kpt), irradiated, and cocultured ...

Given that the DC-MM interaction involves multiple receptor-ligand bindings that could have cellular effects, the specific contribution of CD28 on the modulation of proliferation was assessed by blocking CD80/CD86 with the chimeric CD28 receptor–Ig Fc molecule CD28-Ig. As seen in Figure 7D, CD28-Ig reversed the inhibition of 8226 proliferation induced by coculture with DCs derived from KG1. Similar results were obtained with U266 and MM.1S (not shown).

Although we have previously shown that cell line–derived DCs are very similar to DCs derived from normal progenitors, it is formally possible that these DCs have aberrant properties in their interaction with myeloma cells. To address this, 8226 were cocultured with normal monocyte-derived DCs (mo-DCs).37 In addition, we asked whether immature DCs (iDCs; differentiated with GM-CSF plus IL-4) affected myeloma cell proliferation differently than mature DCs (mDCs; GM-CSF + IL-4 + TNF-α). iDCs have lower expression of costimulatory ligands than mDCs and are less effective at activating T cells,56 and would be predicted to be less effective in suppressing myeloma proliferation. As seen in Figure 7E, both iDCs and mDCs significantly downmodulate 8226 proliferation at cell ratios of 1:1. mDCs appear to be more potent as they can do this at lower DC/myeloma cell ratios than iDCs, which would be consistent with greater CD80/CD86 expression.

To assess whether DCs can also transduce a survival signal similar to anti-CD28 mAb, 8226 was cultured alone, with undifferentiated K562 or K562-derived DCs in 100 μM dex (Figure 7F). Similar to our results with antibody-mediated activation, coculture with DCs doubles the viability of 8226 versus myeloma cells alone or plus DC precursors.

Discussion

Consistent with the clinical observation that CD28 expression on myeloma cells correlates with poor prognosis and disease progression, we have found that CD28 activation induces PI3K and NFκB signaling in myeloma cells, and delivers both antiproliferative and prosurvival signals. Although the intracellular signaling pathways downstream of CD28 have not been well described in myeloma cells, CD28 signaling in T cells induces PI3K activation15 and significantly augments NFκB activation57 in combination with mitogen, while superagonistic anti-CD28 antibodies can induce NFκB signaling without a concurrent TCR signal.58 Our findings and those of others26 thus suggest that at least 1 CD28 signaling pathway is the same in myeloma cells as it is in T cells, namely CD28 → PI3K → PDK-1 → Akt →IκB.

The observation that PI3K activation of Akt and NFκB is induced by IGF-1 (an established survival factor for myeloma)16,17 further supports a similar survival signal transduced by CD28. Interestingly, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a central downstream component of Akt signaling, and inhibition by rapamycin both inhibits CD28-mediated mTOR activation in T cells59 and sensitizes cells to dex-induced apoptosis in myeloma.60 Finally, NFκB signaling itself (separate from any upstream signaling pathway) has been clearly shown to enhance myeloma survival,42,61 and all these data together support a prosurvival function of CD28 in myeloma.

Despite the similarities in intracellular signaling, we find significant differences in CD28 activation in myeloma versus T cells. First, a synchronous antigen receptor “signal 1” that is required for CD28 costimulation in T cells appears unnecessary in myeloma cells. Myeloma does not express an antigen receptor, and attempts to define an alternative signal 1 (eg, IL-6, PKC agonists22,26) that is costimulated by CD28 have been equivocal. However, even in T cells, CD28 can signal in the absence of a concurrent TCR signal,15,62 and superagonistic anti-CD28 antibodies can activate T cells without a signal 1.58 Thus, it is possible that CD28 activation alone induces cellular responses in myeloma because it is triggered at a lower threshold. Alternatively, there may be less negative regulation of downstream signaling (eg, PI3K by PTEN), resulting in transduction of a comparatively larger signal in myeloma versus T cells.

A second difference is the effect of CD28 on proliferation, with augmentation in T cells and downmodulation in myeloma cells. Our findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that soluble anti-CD28 mAb 9.3 (the same as used in our studies) could suppress the proliferation of the MER myeloma cell line by 50%,13 as well as a recent study using another anti-CD28 mAb.30 Although the reasons for this MM/T difference are unclear, it has been shown in T cells that the ability of CD28 to augment proliferation and survival can be segregated into 2 downstream signaling pathways.41 It is possible that myeloma cells lack the downstream pathways involved in proliferation while retaining the prosurvival pathway, and prosurvival signals by themselves can negatively regulate cell-cycle progression.5,6,63 Another possibility is that CD28 in myeloma cells does not elicit autocrine secretion of proliferative cytokines, whereas CD28-induced autocrine secretion of IL-2 is a major factor driving T-cell proliferation.

Interestingly, the G1 arrest we find for CD28 has also been reported in myeloma cells following integrin-mediated adhesion (involving p27kip1), which similarly results in induction of NFκB, decreased proliferation, and enhanced survival/resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.46 These latter studies also suggest that the decreased proliferation plays a significant role in cell adhesion–mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR), protecting MM cells from chemotherapies that target cycling cells.

In addition to defining differences between myeloma and T cells, our findings also stand in contrast to some previous studies in myeloma that have found variable effects of CD28 activation on proliferation and survival, including a recent report of the induction of MM cell apoptosis by anti-CD28 mAb.30 There are potentially several technical variables that may underlie these differences. First, the different anti-CD28 antibodies may differ in their agonistic or antagonistic/blocking effects. Second, our survival studies were done in no/low serum conditions, whereas previous studies were done in 10% serum. It is possible that in the higher-serum conditions, the level of exogenous prosurvival factors (especially IGF-1) were sufficient to mask any effect of CD28 activation on survival.

If CD28 is supporting myeloma cell survival, activation in vivo must be occurring through direct contact with CD80/CD86+ cells. There are 2 nonexclusive possibilities: binding to CD86 on other myeloma cells, and myeloma cell interaction with normal professional APCs. Although we do not have clear evidence for a myeloma-myeloma interaction, the aggregate findings of several studies demonstrates that more than 50% of primary relapsed myelomas are CD86+, 100% of CD28+ myelomas are CD86+, and that CD86+ myelomas have a significantly worse prognosis.12,25 Similarly, we and others13,26 have found that myeloma cell lines typically coexpress CD28 and CD86, although these latter 2 reports are contradictory as to whether autocrine CD28 activation is occurring. The second possibility is that CD28 activation in myeloma occurs the same way it does on T cells, namely by direct contact with CD80/CD86+ APCs. In addition to CD80/CD86 expression, professional APCs have specialized ability to directly interact with other immune cells that includes the expression of appropriate adhesion molecules and chemoattractant chemokines. This is particularly true for DCs.56 There is considerable evidence that DCs are directly involved in the survival, proliferation, and differentiation of normal B cells and plasma cells. These include DC expression of IL-6,64,65 that DCs and B cells form clusters in vitro and in vivo,66 and that this direct interaction provides B cells with proliferation and survival signals67 and drives their differentiation to plasma cells.6870 Recent studies have found that DCs enhance plasmablast survival and differentiation, in part through secretion of APRIL and/or BAFF.71 And very recently it has been shown that DCs support the clonogenicity of human MM cells.72 It seems likely that this advantageous interaction is maintained by transformed plasma cells, and are consistent with: (1) substantial numbers of host DCs (and other APCs) rapidly infiltrate implanted plasmacytomas;31 (2) in primary patient isolates, bone marrow DCs are selectively and intimately associated with myeloma cells (our findings and Rettig et al32); and (3) exogenously added APRIL and BAFF protect myeloma cells against apoptosis caused by IL-6 withdrawal and dex.73 Our results indicate that 1 molecular component of a DC/MM interaction is activation of CD28, but given the molecular complexity of DC interactions with other immune cells, it seems likely that other important signals (eg, integrin-mediated signals) are also transduced to myeloma cells by this contact.

Finally, identifying CD28 and bone marrow APCs as potential contributors to the pathogenesis of MM raises the possibility of targeting them therapeutically. Such strategies would include direct targeting/blocking CD28 by mAbs and agents that block CD28 signaling (such as rapamycin, which is being clinically developed for organ transplantation). Finally, a large number of factors (drugs, cytokines, microbial products) are known to modulate DC activation/function in the context of eliciting immune responses, and may also have effects on any myeloma/DC interaction. Along these lines, it is interesting to note that both thalidomide and bortezomib, which have significant activity in myeloma, have been shown to modulate DC function74,75 and induce DC apoptosis.76

Acknowledgments

Supported by the Senior Investigator Research Award from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, and National Institutes of Health grants CA85208, CA097243, and CA95829.

Footnotes

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Authorship

Author contributions: N.J.B., A.M.K., D.K., L.M.C., H.Y.L., and G.E.B. Jr all performed vital research for this paper. M.H., H.T., and B.L.L. provided vital reagents. L.H.B. analyzed the data. K.L. designed the research and wrote the paper.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Kelvin P. Lee, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton St., Buffalo, NY 14263; e-mail: gro.krapllewsor@eel.nivlek.

References

1. Dalton WS, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM, Anderson KC, Harousseau JL. Multiple myeloma. Am Soc Hematol Education Program. 2001:157–177. [PubMed]
2. Lokhorst HM, Sonneveld P, Verdonck LF. Intensive treatment for multiple myeloma: where do we stand? Br J Haematol. 1999;106:18–27. [PubMed]
3. Pearse RN, Sordillo EM, Yaccoby S, et al. Multiple myeloma disrupts the TRANCE/osteoprotegerin cytokine axis to trigger bone destruction and promote tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11581–11586. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Damiano JS, Cress AE, Hazlehurst LA, Shtil AA, Dalton WS. Cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR): role of integrins and resistance to apoptosis in human myeloma cell lines. Blood. 1999;93:1658–1667. [PubMed]
5. Hazlehurst LA, Damiano JS, Buyuksal I, Pledger WJ, Dalton WS. Adhesion to fibronectin via beta1 integrins regulates p27kip1 levels and contributes to cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). Oncogene. 2000;19:4319–4327. [PubMed]
6. Landowski TH, Olashaw NE, Agrawal D, Dalton WS. Cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR) is associated with activation of NF-kappa B (RelB/p50) in myeloma cells. Oncogene. 2003;22:2417–2421. [PubMed]
7. Sanz-Rodriguez F, Teixido J. VLA-4-dependent myeloma cell adhesion. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;41:239–245. [PubMed]
8. Yaccoby S, Wezeman MJ, Henderson A, et al. Cancer and the microenvironment: myeloma-osteoclast interactions as a model. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2016–2023. [PubMed]
9. Tricot G, Barlogie B, Van Rhee F. Treatment advances in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2004;125:24–30. [PubMed]
10. Kozbor D, Moretta A, Messner HA, Moretta L, Croce CM. Tp44 molecules involved in antigen-independent T-cell activation are expressed on human plasma cells. J Immunol. 1987;138:4128–4132. [PubMed]
11. Lee KP, Taylor C, Petryniak B, et al. The genomic organization of the CD28 gene: implications for the regulation of CD28 mRNA expression and heterogeneity. J Immunol. 1990;145:344–352. [PubMed]
12. Robillard N, Jego G, Pellat-Deceunynck C, et al. CD28, a marker associated with tumoral expansion in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:1521–1526. [PubMed]
13. Kornbluth J. Potential role of CD28-B7 interactions in the growth of myeloma plasma cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;194:43–49. [PubMed]
14. Sharpe AH, Freeman GJ. The B7-CD28 superfamily. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:116–126. [PubMed]
15. Rudd CE, Schneider H. Unifying concepts in CD28, ICOS and CTLA4 co-receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:544–556. [PubMed]
16. Tu Y, Gardner A, Lichtenstein A. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT kinase pathway in multiple myeloma plasma cells: roles in cytokine-dependent survival and proliferative responses. Cancer Res. 2000;60:6763–6770. [PubMed]
17. Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades N, Poulaki V, et al. Activation of NF-κB and upregulation of intracellular anti-apoptotic proteins via the IGF-1/Akt signaling in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic implications. Oncogene. 2002;21:5673–5683. [PubMed]
18. Shahinian A, Pfeffer K, Lee KP, et al. Differential T cell costimulatory requirements in CD28-deficient mice. Science. 1993;261:609–612. [PubMed]
19. Lindstein T, June CH, Ledbetter JA, Stella G, Thompson CB. Regulation of lymphokine messenger RNA stability by a surface-mediated T cell activation pathway. Science. 1989;244:339–343. [PubMed]
20. Boise LH, Minn AJ, Noel PJ, et al. CD28 costimulation can promote T cell survival by enhancing the expression of Bcl-XL. Immunity. 1995;3:87–98. [PubMed]
21. Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, et al. The CD28 signaling pathway regulates glucose metabolism. Immunity. 2002;16:769–777. [PubMed]
22. Shapiro VS, Mollenauer MN, Weiss A. Endogenous CD28 expressed on myeloma cells up-regulates interleukin-8 production: implications for multiple myeloma progression. Blood. 2001;98:187–193. [PubMed]
23. Almeida J, Orfao A, Ocqueteau M, et al. High-sensitive immunophenotyping and DNA ploidy studies for the investigation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1999;107:121–131. [PubMed]
24. Mateo G, Gutierrez N, Lopez-Berges MC, et al. Immunophenotype of the malignant clone: implications for management. Haematologica. 2005;90(S1):3.
25. Pope B, Brown RD, Gibson J, Yuen E, Joshua D. B7–2-positive myeloma: incidence, clinical characteristics, prognostic significance, and implications for tumor immunotherapy. Blood. 2000;96:1274–1279. [PubMed]
26. Zhang XG, Olive D, Devos J, et al. Malignant plasma cell lines express a functional CD28 molecule. Leukemia. 1998;12:610–618. [PubMed]
27. Lorre K, Kasran A, Van Vaeck F, de Boer M, Ceuppens JL. Interleukin-1 and B7/CD28 interaction regulate interleukin-6 production by human T cells. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;70:81–90. [PubMed]
28. Horspool JH, Perrin PJ, Woodcock JB, et al. Nucleic acid vaccine-induced immune responses require CD28 costimulation and are regulated by CTLA4. J Immunol. 1998;160:2706–2714. [PubMed]
29. Gray PK, Stephan RP, Apilado RG, et al. Expression of CD28 by bone marrow stromal cells and its involvement in B lymphopoiesis. J Immunol. 2002;169:2292–2302. [PubMed]
30. Qiu YH, Sun ZW, Shi Q, et al. Apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells induced by agonist monoclonal antibody against human CD28. Cell Immunol. 2005;236:154–160. [PubMed]
31. Corthay A, Skovseth DK, Lundin KU, et al. Primary antitumor immune response mediated by CD4+ T cells. Immunity. 2005;22:371–383. [PubMed]
32. Rettig MB, Ma HJ, Vescio RA, et al. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection of bone marrow dendritic cells from multiple myeloma patients. Science. 1997;276:1851–1854. [PubMed]
33. June CH, Ledbetter JA, Gillespie MM, Lindsten T, Thompson CB. T-cell proliferation involving the CD28 pathway is associated with cyclosporine-resistant interleukin 2 gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:4472–4481. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Levine BL, Ueda Y, Craighead N, Huang ML, June CH. CD28 ligands CD80 (B7–1) and CD86 (B7–2) induce long-term autocrine growth of CD4+ T cells and induce similar patterns of cytokine secretion in vitro. Int Immunol. 1995;7:891–904. [PubMed]
35. Lindner I, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Ayala E, et al. Induced dendritic cell differentiation of chronic myeloid leukemia blasts is associated with down-regulation of BCR-ABL. J Immunol. 2003;171:1780–191. [PubMed]
36. St. Louis DC, Woodcock JB, Franzoso G, et al. Evidence for distinct intracellular signaling pathways in CD34+ progenitor to dendritic cell differentiation from a human cell line model. J Immunol. 1999;162:3237–3248. [PubMed]
37. Schlienger K, Craighead N, Lee KP, Levine BL, June CH. Efficient priming of protein antigen-specific human CD4(+) T cells by monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood. 2000;96:3490–3498. [PubMed]
38. Coligan JE, editor. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1996. Current Protocols in Immunology.
39. Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. Activation and inhibition of lymphocytes by costimulation. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:295–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Cejas PJ, Carlson LM, Kolonias D, et al. Regulation of RelB expression during the initiation of dendritic cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7900–7916. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Burr JS, Savage ND, Messah GE, et al. Cutting edge: distinct motifs within CD28 regulate T cell proliferation and induction of Bcl-XL. J Immunol. 2001;166:5331–5335. [PubMed]
42. Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Richardson P, et al. NF-kappa B as a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:16639–16647. [PubMed]
43. Harrington EA, Bennett MR, Fanidi A, Evan GI. c-Myc-induced apoptosis in fibroblasts is inhibited by specific cytokines. EMBO J. 1994;13:3286–3295. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Said JW, Rettig MR, Heppner K, et al. Localization of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus in bone marrow biopsy samples from patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 1997;90:4278–4282. [PubMed]
45. Bros M, Ross XL, Pautz A, Reske-Kunz AB, Ross R. The human fascin gene promoter is highly active in mature dendritic cells due to a stage-specific enhancer. J Immunol. 2003;171:1825–1834. [PubMed]
46. Pinkus GS, Lones MA, Matsumura F, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis immunohistochemical expression of fascin, a dendritic cell marker. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118:335–343. [PubMed]
47. Pinkus GS, Pinkus JL, Langhoff E, et al. Fascin, a sensitive new marker for Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin's disease: evidence for a dendritic or B cell derivation? Am J Pathol. 1997;150:543–562. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Vakkila J, Lotze MT, Riga C, Jaffe R. A basis for distinguishing cultured dendritic cells and macrophages in cytospins and fixed sections. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005;8:43–51. [PubMed]
49. Ackerman AL, Cresswell P. Regulation of MHC class I transport in human dendritic cells and the dendritic-like cell line KG-1. J Immunol. 2003;170:4178–4188. [PubMed]
50. Li J, Mbow ML, Sun L, et al. Induction of dendritic cell maturation by IL-18. Cell Immunol. 2004;227:103–108. [PubMed]
51. Hajas G, Zsiros E, Laszlo T, et al. New phenotypic, functional and electrophysiological characteristics of KG-1 cells. Immunol Lett. 2004;92:97–106. [PubMed]
52. Suciu-Foca CN, Piazza F, Ho E, et al. Distinct mRNA microarray profiles of tolerogenic dendritic cells. Hum Immunol. 2001;62:1065–1072. [PubMed]
53. Hulette BC, Rowden G, Ryan CA, et al. Cytokine induction of a human acute myelogenous leukemia cell line (KG-1) to a CD1a+ dendritic cell phenotype. Arch Dermatol Res. 2001;293:147–158. [PubMed]
54. Wang Y, Kelly CG, Karttunen JT, et al. CD40 is a cellular receptor mediating mycobacterial heat shock protein 70 stimulation of CC-chemokines. Immunity. 2001;15:971–983. [PubMed]
55. Soilleux EJ, Barten R, Trowsdale J. DC-SIGN, a related gene, DC-SIGNR, and CD23 form a cluster on 19p13. J Immunol. 2000;165:2937–2942. [PubMed]
56. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;392:245–252. [PubMed]
57. Harhaj EW, Sun SC. IkappaB kinases serve as a target of CD28 signaling. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25185–25190. [PubMed]
58. Luhder F, Huang Y, Dennehy KM, et al. Topological requirements and signaling properties of T cell-activating, anti-CD28 antibody superagonists. J Exp Med. 2003;197:955–966. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Ghosh P, Buchholz MA, Yano S, Taub D, Longo DL. Effect of rapamycin on the cyclosporin A–resistant CD28-mediated costimulatory pathway. Blood. 2002;99:4517–4524. [PubMed]
60. Stromberg T, Dimberg A, Hammarberg A, et al. Rapamycin sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to apoptosis induced by dexamethasone. Blood. 2004;103:3138–3147. [PubMed]
61. Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, et al. Biologic sequelae of nuclear factor-κB blockade in multiple myeloma: therapeutic applications. Blood. 2002;99:4079–4086. [PubMed]
62. LeBlanc R, Hideshima T, Catley LP, et al. Immunomodulatory drug costimulates T cells via the B7-CD28 pathway. Blood. 2004;103:1787–1790. [PubMed]
63. Linette GP, Li Y, Roth K, Korsmeyer SJ. Cross talk between cell death and cell cycle progression: BCL-2 regulates NFAT-mediated activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:9545–9552. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Zhou LJ, Tedder TF. A distinct pattern of cytokine gene expression by human CD83+ blood dendritic cells. Blood. 1995;86:3295–3301. [PubMed]
65. Santiago-Schwarz F, Tucci J, Carsons SE. Endogenously produced interleukin 6 is an accessory cytokine for dendritic cell hematopoiesis. Stem Cells. 1996;14:225–231. [PubMed]
66. Kushnir N, Liu L, MacPherson GG. Dendritic cells and resting B cells form clusters in vitro and in vivo: T cell independence, partial LFA-1 dependence, and regulation by cross-linking surface molecules. J Immunol. 1998;160:1774–1781. [PubMed]
67. Wykes M, MacPherson G. Dendritic cell-B-cell interaction: dendritic cells provide B cells with CD40-independent proliferation signals and CD40-dependent survival signals. Immunology. 2000;100:1–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Fayette J, Durand I, Bridon JM, et al. Dendritic cells enhance the differentiation of naive B cells into plasma cells in vitro. Scand J Immunol. 1998;48:563–570. [PubMed]
69. Dubois B, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B, et al. Critical role of IL-12 in dendritic cell-induced differentiation of naive B lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1998;161:2223–2231. [PubMed]
70. Dubois B, Barthelemy C, Durand I, et al. Toward a role of dendritic cells in the germinal center reaction: triggering of B cell proliferation and isotype switching. J Immunol. 1999;162:3428–3436. [PubMed]
71. Balazs M, Martin F, Zhou T, Kearney J. Blood dendritic cells interact with splenic marginal zone B cells to initiate T-independent immune responses. Immunity. 2002;17:341–352. [PubMed]
72. Kukreja A, Hutchinson A, Dhodapkar K, et al. Enhancement of clonogenicity of human multiple myeloma by dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1859–1865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Moreaux J, Legouffe E, Jourdan E, et al. BAFF and APRIL protect myeloma cells from apoptosis induced by interleukin-6 deprivation and dexamethasone. Blood. 2004;103:3148–3157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Deng L, Ding W, Granstein RD. Thalidomide inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha production and antigen presentation by Langerhans cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:1060–1065. [PubMed]
75. Mohty M, Stoppa AM, Blaise D, et al. Differential regulation of dendritic cell function by the immunomodulatory drug thalidomide. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;72:939–945. [PubMed]
76. Nencioni A, Garuti A, Schwarzenberg K, et al. Proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36:681–689. [PubMed]

Articles from Blood are provided here courtesy of American Society of Hematology
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...