• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 15, 2008.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC1868432
NIHMSID: NIHMS16750

Development of a Novel Therapeutic Suppressor of Brain Proinflammatory Cytokine Up-Regulation That Attenuates Synaptic Dysfunction and Behavioral Deficits

Abstract

We report the development of a novel, aqueous-soluble, safe, small molecule, experimental therapeutic that suppresses injury-induced, proinflammatory cytokine increases in the brain, with resultant attenuation of synaptic protein biomarker loss and improvement in hippocampus-dependent behavioral deficits. A GMP production scheme for the active pharmaceutical ingredient, compound 17, is presented. The development and large-scale availability of this novel compound allow exploration of new, potentially disease-modifying, therapeutic approaches to CNS disorders.

Over-production of proinflammatory cytokines contributes to the progression of pathology in a diverse array of diseases,15 and the recent approval of protein therapies58 that seek to control the level or activity of proinflammatory cytokines provides a proof-of-concept for targeting proinflammatory cytokine levels in drug discovery. However, the macromolecular therapeutic approach is not as amenable to clinical use in some diseases, such as central nervous system (CNS) disorders, creating an unmet need for small molecule, brain-penetrant compounds as new classes of disease-modifying drugs. An accumulating body of evidence from animal model studies and clinical observations supports the concept1,3,4,9,10 that development of such therapies for CNS disorders could have potential impact on both acute and chronic disorders as diverse as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), stroke, traumatic brain injury, neuropathic pain, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, age-related macular degeneration, and non-AD dementias. The prevailing hypothesis in this regard is that targeting the up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokine production by activated glia, the main cellular source of cytokines in the CNS, will alter disease progression through attenuation of the subsequent neuronal synaptic dysfunction, the cellular basis of clinical symptoms and behavioral alterations. However, there are no such current therapies available and there are no consensus molecular targets for such discovery efforts. The current state of the art requires, therefore, the use of the more classical and unbiased functional approach to drug discovery.11

Recently, we described12,13 a contemporary version of the functional approach for CNS drug discovery that resulted in a novel lead compound with the desired in vivo functions in animal models of disease. The discovery platform used de novo lead compound generation that started with an inactive phenylpyridazine fragment to generate a focused synthetic chemical library.12,14,15 The proprietary library was screened for the ability to suppress, in a concentration-dependent manner, the increased production of proinflammatory cytokines by activated glia in cell culture.1213 Cell-based screening hits were then tested in hierarchal, in vivo screens to eliminate highly toxic compounds and to identify compounds with good in vivo efficacy in animal models of disease. We identified13 a novel, safe, orally active, lead compound (MW01-5-188WH; compound 1 in Table 1), that was efficacious in animal models of AD-relevant pathophysiology.

Table 1
Identification of lead compound

Compound 1 has attractive efficacy and safety screening profiles,13 but its aqueous solubility is not ideal for clinical development. Extensive analyses indicate the significant influence of a compound’s molecular properties on pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and efficacy, with success generally associated with low MW and good aqueous solubility, especially drugs that fall into the top class of the biopharmaceutics classification scheme. 1620 However, increasing the aqueous solubility of a compound while decreasing MW and retaining in vivo biological function is a non-trivial goal often considered paradoxical, especially for CNS lead compounds. We summarize in this report the discovery of a novel lead compound, compound 5 (Table 1), that has improved molecular properties but retains in vivo efficacy. In addition we report the development of a synthetic scheme for good manufacturing protocol (GMP) production of compound 17, a highly soluble and stable dihydrochloride hydrate of compound 5. Compound 17 is the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) currently in clinical development.21

The rationale for efforts to improve molecular properties while retaining activity was to replace the R4 phenyl ring of compound 1 (Table 1). Compound 5 fulfilled these criteria. Compounds 2–6 (Table 1) all have a MW similar to, or less than, compound 1, but have better computed log S values (respectively, −5.4, −5.3, −4.4, −4.9, −4.1 and −4.6 for compounds 1–6). Compounds 2,4,5 and 6 retain activity in the glia cell-based screen for concentration-dependent suppression of IL-1β production, but there was some loss of activity with compound 3 (Table 1). Previous screening results showed15 that there is no activity when R4=H. Therefore, compound 5 was the most promising due to its potential improved aqueous solubility, retention of activity, and a decreased MW (332.40 compared to 394.47). Experimental determination of aqueous solubility confirmed that compound 5 (0.034 mg/L) is much more soluble in water than compound 1 (<0.001 mg/mL).

Interestingly, an analog of compound 5 has been previously described in the literature. 22 The CNS drug minaprine is also a 3-amino-4-methyl-6-phenylpyridazine. However, minaprine is not active as a suppressor of proinflammatory cytokine production by activated glia, suggesting that the details of R3 may be critical for this difference in function. In order to gain insight into key features of compound 5 that distinguish it from minaprine, we examined the effects of diversification at R3 in the context of compound 5 (synthesis of compounds 7–11) on retention of activity. Compounds 7–11 (Table 1) are analogs of compound 5 that differ at R3. Diversification included alternatives to the pyrimidinyl ring, including compounds with a pyrazinyl (compound 7), pyridinyl (compound 8), phenyl (compound 9), or cyclohexyl (compound 10) ring. Preference for an aromatic group at R3 for full activity in the context of a methyl at R4 is suggested by the loss of activity with a cyclohexyl (compound 10) or methyl (compound 11) at R3, and the partial retention of activity with a phenyl or pyridinyl (compounds 8, 9). However, this hypothesis is contradicted by compound 7, which has a pyrazinyl at R3 yet has a lower activity comparable to the cyclohexyl (compound 10) or methyl (compound 11) analogs. The results indicate that only certain types of aromatic rings can substitute for the pyrimidine ring in the context of 3-amino-6-phenylpyridazines represented by compounds 1 and 5. Although compound 5 is distinct from minaprine in its structural requirements at R3, it is similar to minaprine in its retention of partial activity with the presence of a benzyl at R6 instead of a phenyl (compound 12) or loss of activity with the presence of a methyl (compound 13). 21 However, further pursuit of structure-activity relationships was not done as part of this investigation because the discovery of compound 5 provided attainment of our discovery goal, and the diversification at R3 revealed a strict preference for an arylpiperazine, a feature distinguishing compound 5 from minaprine.

A seminal discovery for the studies summarized here is that compound 5 retains the in vivo functions of compound 1 (Figures 1, ,22 and S1 21). Specifically, compound 5 mimics compound 1 in oral bioavailability, safety and CNS disease model efficacy. Compound 5 produces no histological liver injury after chronic oral administration at a potential therapeutic dose, or after acute, escalating-dose oral administration at doses up to 40 times a potential therapeutic dose (Figure 1). It also shows cardiovascular safety, as measured by lack of prolongation of cardiac QTc interval in guinea pigs following FDA recommended protocols. Compound 5 is efficacious in an AD-relevant mouse model of human amyloid-beta (Aβ)-induced injury (Figure 2). A single, daily oral administration of compound 5 at a low dose (2.5 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, beginning 21 days after initiation of the human Aβ injury, effectively suppressed the up-regulation of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and S100B measured at day 60 after the start of injury. The number of activated GFAP-positive astrocytes and F4/80-positive microglia were also reduced. The loss of the synaptic marker proteins synaptophysin and PSD-95 was attenuated. Deficits in the Y-maze, a hippocampus-dependent behavioral task, were ameliorated. These data document that compound 5 retains the desired in vivo functions of the original lead compound 1.

Figure 1
Oral administration of compound 5 does not reveal in vivo liver or cardiac toxicity. (A.) Chronic therapeutic dose test of liver injury: there is no histological evidence of liver injury after oral administration of compound 5 (2.5 mg/kg) to mice once ...
Figure 2
Compound 5 is efficacious in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Compound 5 suppresses up-regulation of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNFα and S100B; decreases astrocyte (GFAP) and microglia (F4/80) activation; prevents loss of ...

The discovery of compound 5 as an analog of compound 1 that retains full in vivo functions of compound 1, but has a lower MW and better aqueous solubility, provided the starting point for development and characterization of an API to allow clinical investigations. Standard diversification chemistries used for the synthesis of compounds such as those in Table 1 are not attractive for chemical processes amenable to large scale GMP production. For example, a Pd-catalyzed reaction from a common 4-chloropyridazine precursor (compound 6) was used initially to synthesize compound 5 and other analogs, summarized in Scheme S1,21 as part of the in-parallel synthetic approach to diversification.12 However, Pd-catalyzed reaction protocols raise specific concerns for GMP production and are not readily scalable. Therefore, we developed an efficient production protocol (Scheme 1) to facilitate manufacture for clinical studies. In addition, the protocol offers the potential for use of water as an alternative solvent in the penultimate amination step. We also added as a last step the production of the dihydrochloride hydrate, compound 17, which is the API,21 as the final product. Hydrochloride hydrates are a common salt form used in API production for diverse drugs,23 including the drug minaprine. As summarized in Scheme 1, the commercially available 2-methyl-4-oxo-4-phenyl butanoic acid was cyclized with hydrazine to obtain compound 14, which was then dehydrogenated to 4-methyl-6-phenylpyridazinone compound 15. Chlorination with phosphorus oxychloride provided the 3-chloropyridazine compound 16. Compound 5 was then obtained by amination. The corresponding dihydrochloride hydrate, compound 17, was synthesized by treatment with HCl in isopropanol. As detailed in supporting data,21 this scheme and its variations have been used for generation of the API at the multi-gram level in the laboratory and at the kg level under GMP conditions.

Scheme 1
Reagents and conditions: (a) N2H4, EtOH, reflux; (b) CuCl2, CH3CN, reflux; (c) POCl3, CH3CN, reflux; (d) 1-(2-pyrimidyl)piperazine, water, reflux; (e) HCl, isopropanol.

Compound 17 is water-soluble and stable. Compound 17 has improved solubility at 37°C compared to the lead base compound 5, and compared to compound 18,21 the analogous dihydrochloride hydrate of compound 1. The experimental values for compound 17 and compound 18 are, respectively, 322mg/ml and 0.04mg/ml. In contrast to differences in experimentally determined aqueous solubility, these compounds possess similar experimentally determined logP values (2.3 and 2.7), as measured by octanol/water partition coefficient. Compound 17 has a melting point >215°C, a temperature at which it decomposes, compared to a melting point of 115.7 – 116.4°C for the base compound 5. When compound 17 was tested for chemical stability in water, dilute acid, or dilute base at 37°C over 5 days, there was <5% loss of material in water and acid. Compound 17 was less stable in basic conditions, with only 53% remaining after 5 days. Compound 17 also showed <10% loss of material when treated with 3% (v/v) H2O2 at ambient temperature (24ºC) for up to 48 h. These data provide experimental evidence that the molecular properties were improved as a result of refinement, and demonstrate that the API is a water-soluble, stable product.

In summary, we have described the discovery and development of a novel, water-soluble, safe, experimental therapeutic with potential to be a new type of disease-modifying drug. Currently, IND-enabling preclinical toxicology and pharmacokinetic analyses are validating and extending the findings of the initial screens reported here, and GMP manufacture of the API for clinical studies has been accomplished.21

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by NIH grants AG028561, NS047586, and AG000260.

Footnotes

SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE: The contents of Supporting Information include the following: details of synthetic procedures, analytical chemistry methods, physical property determinations, NMR spectra, and biological procedures, including screening data for oral bioavailability.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and Notes

1. Craft JM, Watterson DM, Van Eldik LJ. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2005;9:887. [PubMed]
2. Mrak RE, Griffin WST. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26:349. [PubMed]
3. Wyss-Coray T. Nature Med. 2006;12:1005. [PubMed]
4. Watkins LR, Maier SF. Nature Rev Drug Disc. 2003;2:973. [PubMed]
5. Maini RN, Taylor PC. Ann Rev Med. 2000;51:207. [PubMed]
6. Scott DL, Kingsley MB. New Engl J Med. 2006;335:704. [PubMed]
7. Tobinick E, Gross H, Weinberger A, Cohen H. Medscape Gen Med. 2006;8:25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Mpofu S, Fatima F, Moots RJ. Rheumatology. 2005;44:271. [PubMed]
9. Guo Z, Cupples LA, Kurz A, Auerbach SH, Volicer L, Chui H, Green RC, Sadovnick AD, Duara R, DeCarli C, Johnson K, Go RC, Growdon JH, Haines JL, Kukull WA, Farrer LA. Neurology. 2000;54:1316. [PubMed]
10. D’Ambrosio R, Perucca E. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004;17:731. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Sams-Dodd F. Drug Disc Today. 2006;11:465. [PubMed]
12. Wing LK, Behanna HA, Van Eldik LJ, Watterson DM, Ralay Ranaivo H. Curr Alz Res. 2006;3:205. [PubMed]
13. Ralay Ranaivo H, Craft JM, Hu W, Guo L, Wing LK, Van Eldik LJ, Watterson DM. J Neurosci. 2006;26:662. [PubMed]
14. Velentza AV, Wainwright MS, Zasadzki M, Mirzoeva S, Schumacher AM, Haiech J, Focia P, Egli M, Watterson DM. Bioorg Med Chem Ltr. 2003;13:3465. [PubMed]
15. Hu W, Ralay Ranaivo H, Craft JM, Van Eldik LJ, Watterson DM. Curr Alz Res. 2005;2:197.
16. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 1997;23:3.
17. van de Waterbeemd H, Smith DA, Beaumont K, Walker DK. JMedChem. 2001;44:1313. [PubMed]
18. Wenlock MC, Austin RP, Barton P, Davis AM, Leeson PD. JMedChem. 2003;46:1250. [PubMed]
19. Vieth M, Siegel MG, Higgs RE, Watson IA, Robertson DH, Savin KA, Durst GL, Hipskind PA. J Med Chem. 2004;47:224. [PubMed]
20. Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng HY, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. J Med Chem. 2002;45:2615. [PubMed]
21. Details of synthetic procedures, analytical chemistry methods, physical property determinations, NMR spectra, and biological procedures, including screening data for oral bioavailability and brain uptake, can be found in Supporting Information. Information about the clinical development of compound 17 under the name of Minozac can be accessed on the website of NeuroMedix (NMX) Inc., < http://www.neuromedix.com>.
22. Wermuth CG, Schlewer G, Bourguignon JJ, Maghioros G, Bouchet MJ, Moire C, Kan JP, Worms P, Biziere K. J Med Chem. 1989;32:528. [PubMed]
23. Wermuth CG, Stahl PH. In: Handbook of Pharmaceutical Salts. Stahl PH, Wermuth CG, editors. Wiley-VCH: 2002. p. 249.

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • BioAssay
    BioAssay
    PubChem BioAssay links
  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...