![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Gouriet et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. From cat scratch disease to endocarditis, the possible natural history of Bartonella henselae infection 1Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, IFR 48, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France 2Service de Cardiologie B, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Timone, Marseille, 247, rue Saint-Pierre, Marseille 13385 Cedex 5, France 3Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Timone, 247, rue Saint-Pierre, Marseille 13385 Cedex 5, France Corresponding author.Frédérique Gouriet: frederique.gouriet/at/medecine.univ-mrs.fr; Hubert Lepidi: hubert.lepidi/at/medecine.univ-mrs.fr; Gilbert Habib: gilbert.habib/at/ap-hm.fr; Frédéric Collart: frederic.collart/at/mail.ap-hm.fr; Didier Raoult: didier.raoult/at/medecine.univ-mrs.fr Received September 25, 2006; Accepted April 18, 2007. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Most patients with infectious endocarditis (IE) due to Bartonella henselae have a history of exposure to cats and pre-existing heart valve lesions. To date, none of the reported patients have had a history of typical cat scratch disease (CSD) which is also a manifestation of infection with B. henselae. Case presentation Here we report the case of a patient who had CSD and six months later developed IE of the mitral valve caused by B. henselae. Conclusion Based on this unique case, we speculate that CSD represents the primary-infection of B. henselae and that IE follows in patients with heart valve lesions. Background Bartonella spp. are link to the host immune system, infection with the same Bartonella species (e.g., B. henselae) can result in focal suppurative reaction (cat scratch disease in immunocompetent patients), a multifocal angioproliferative response (bacillary angiomatosis in immunocompromised patients), an increased immune response without evidence of bacteria in patient tissues (meningoencephalitis), or endovascular multiplication of the bacteria (endocarditis). Of the 19 species within the genus Bartonella [1], seven are known to cause infective endocarditis (IE) in people: B. quintana [2], B. henselae [3], B. elizabethae [4], B. vinsonii subps. berkhoffii [5], B. vinsonii subps. arupensis [6], B. kohlerae [7] and B. alsatica [8]. These zoonotic agents cause 1 to 15% of all cases of IE [3,9,10] and cannot be detected using routine blood cultures due to the fastidious nature of the bacteria. The most widely used method for the laboratory diagnosis of infection with Bartonella sp. is serology. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) has been described [11] but indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) is the reference technique [12], despite cross-reactivity among Bartonella spp. [13]. Our laboratory uses two IFA titers in the diagnosis of Bartonella infections. In conjunction with a compatible medical history, an IgG titer ≥1:50 to B. henselae suggests a diagnosis of acute infections such as cat scratch disease (CSD), while IgG ≥1:800 to either B. henselae or B. quintana suggests a diagnosis of endocarditis [14,15]. Western-blotting with adsorbed sera enables us to differentiate between infections with B. henselae and B. quintana [13]. Currently, the literature describes B. henselae as an agent causing a typical endocarditis which is easily diagnosed using the Duke criteria [3,16] and usually with vegetations that can be detected by echocardiography. Patients usually have a pre-existing cardiac valve lesion and although they are exposed to cats, they usually do not have a history of CSD. Here we report a patient who suffered from CSD and subsequently developed B. henselae IE. Case presentation Case In May 2005, a 43-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with mitral regurgitation. In 1981, he had been in a car crash and developed a destructive nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis of the mitral valve. A bioprosthesis was inserted which failed in 1988 and was replaced. In May 2005, regurgitation through the valve was once again detected and the patient was hospitalized for a further valve replacement. The patient was afebrile and had a systolic murmur over the mitral area. He had no leukocytosis (leukocyte count was 3.63 × 109/l with 50.2% neutrophils). The low neutrophil count corrected itself spontaneously. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (16/43 mm) and C-reactive protein (<5 mg/l) was normal and hepatic enzymes were elevated (ALT: 69 IU/L; normal ≤ 40 IU/L). Three routine blood cultures were negative (Bactec, Becton Dickinson, Sparus, Maryland) and no rheumatoid factor was detected. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed mitral insufficiency but there were no vegetations and IE was not considered as a possible diagnosis. However, no transesophageal echocardiography was performed. Histology of the prosthetic valve removed at surgery using reported methods [17,18], revealed an IE with a vegetation containing micro-organisms that stained with Warthin-Starry and Giemsa [19] (Figure (Figure1).1
The diagnosis of IE was made retrospectively based on the combination of histology of the cardiac valve lesions, culture of Bartonella from the valve, presence of a predisposing heart condition, and serological evidence of Bartonella infection. Without the histology of the valve the patient would not have had a positive score using the Duke criteria; he would only have had 2 minor criteria. After surgery, the patient recovered rapidly with routine post-surgical amoxicillin administration for 4 days, followed by gentamycin for 15 days and doxycycline for 1 month [23]. Retrospectively, it was found that six months before the patient had had suspected lymphoma of an inguinal lymph node. Histology of the node, however, showed a necrotizing lymphadenitis suggested of CSD. Numerous microabscesses containing fragmented neutrophils were observed in homogenous necrotic areas. These necrotic regions were surrounded by a ring of macrophages and epithelioid histiocytes to form stellate inflammatory granulomas (Figure (Figure1).1 The patient did not own a cat but reported a single contact with a stray cat that scratched him one month before the enlargement of the inguinal lymph node. We report the development of IE after a likely episode of CSD in a patient with a mechanical mitral cardiac valve. In previous studies [16], B. henselae was described in patients who have regular contact with cats and with pre-existing valvulopathies [24,25], but to the best of our knowledge the progression of CSD to IE has not previously been reported. Discussion We describe here the development of IE six months after CSD in a patient with a known valvulopathy. The diagnosis of CSD was histological as blood collected at the time was not available for serological or DNA testing. Serology in May 2005, however, revealed a titer of 1:200 against the Bartonella antigens, which is intermediate between the titer we use to diagnose CSD and that for IE [26]. Most patients with Bartonella IE have high titers >800 [14]. However, in our case the western-blotting showed an endocarditis profile (Figure (Figure2)2 Therefore, the natural history of B. henselae may resemble that of Q fever [28]. As with B. henselae, the majority of patients with Q fever IE have pre-existing valve lesions [16]. Between 30 and 50% of patients with cardiac valve lesions that have primary infections with Coxiella burnetii (symptomatic or asymptomatic) develop IE within 2 years [29]. However, the delay between bacteremia and IE ranges from months to years and we now recommend that the presence of valve lesions be carefully investigated in patients with Q fever as this enables early treatment [30]. In various studies, the seroprevalences of antibodies to B. henselae in healthy people have ranged from 3 to 6% [31]. This suggests that many primary infections with B. henselae are asymptomatic [32]. Asymptomatic primary infections may result in IE as well. We speculate that following exposure to B. henselae, a patient may develop bacteremia with or without clinical signs of typical CSD [27]. In patients with valvular lesions this may result in IE. In our patient, a diagnosis of IE was not considered as the condition was asymptomatic and it may have been several months before typical clinical signs would have become apparent (Figure (Figure3).3
Conclusion This single case report provides further insight into the natural history of B. henselae IE. To our knowledge this is the first report of the progression of probable CSD to B. henselae IE in a patient with a pre-existing cardiac valve lesion and only a single contact with a cat. It shows that contact with a cat and CSD are risk factors for IE in patients with cardiac valve disease. Our findings suggest echocardiography may be indicated in patients with CSD. Follow-up of patients with cardiac valve lesions that develop CSD may enable the early treatment of B. henselae IE. Competing interests The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions FG participated in the conception of the study, participated in its coordination, drafted the paper and took care of the hospitalized patient. HL performed anatomopathology and immunohistochemistry. GH took charge of the patient and followed the patient. FC carried out the surgery. DR conceived the study, coordinated it, finalized the paper and followed the patient after hospitalization. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Pre-publication history The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: Acknowledgements We thank Mireille Papadacci and Jean-Paul Casalta for help in collecting data. We thank Pat Kelly for reviewing the manuscript. Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the study. We thank Wenjun Li and Pierre-Edouard Fournier fo the B. henselae sequencing. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Mar; 41(3):919-25.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2003]N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 16; 332(7):419-23.
[N Engl J Med. 1995]Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 15; 125(8):646-52.
[Ann Intern Med. 1996]J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr; 31(4):872-81.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1993]J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Apr; 38(4):1698-700.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2000]Am J Med. 2005 Mar; 118(3):230-8.
[Am J Med. 2005]Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2002 Jun; 16(2):339-61, ix.
[Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2002]Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 Dec; 114(6):880-9.
[Am J Clin Pathol. 2000]J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Oct; 43(10):4993-5002.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2005]J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Oct; 38(10):3623-30.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2000]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jun; 48(6):1921-33.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004]Medicine (Baltimore). 2001 Jul; 80(4):245-51.
[Medicine (Baltimore). 2001]J Pediatr. 1998 Jun; 132(6):1051-4.
[J Pediatr. 1998]Heart. 1997 May; 77(5):474-6.
[Heart. 1997]Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Sep; 9(5):1004-9.
[Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002]Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Jul; 9(4):795-801.
[Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002]Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003 Jan; 10(1):95-102.
[Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003]J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jun; 44(6):2288-90.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2006]Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Apr; 5(4):219-26.
[Lancet Infect Dis. 2005]Medicine (Baltimore). 2001 Jul; 80(4):245-51.
[Medicine (Baltimore). 2001]Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug 1; 33(3):312-6.
[Clin Infect Dis. 2001]Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 15; 42(6):818-21.
[Clin Infect Dis. 2006]Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Jul; 13(3):428-38.
[Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000]J Infect Chemother. 2006 Aug; 12(4):224-6.
[J Infect Chemother. 2006]J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jun; 44(6):2288-90.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2006]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jun; 48(6):1921-33.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004]Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug 1; 33(3):312-6.
[Clin Infect Dis. 2001]