![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007, Biophysical Society Mechanism of Copper Mediated Triple Helix Formation at Neutral pH in Drosophila Satellite Repeats *Laboratoire de Biophysique Moléculaire, Cellulaire et Tissulaire (BioMoCeTi), Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 7033, Unité de Formation et de Recherche, Santé, Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, 93017 Bobigny cedex, France; †Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Case 138, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France; and ‡Plate-forme Synthèse d'Oligonucléotides, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France Address reprint requests to J. Lacoste, Tel.: 33-1-48-38-73-91; Fax: 33-1-48-38-73-56; E-mail: jerl/at/ccr.jussieu.fr. Received October 23, 2006; Accepted December 8, 2006. Abstract The highly repeated Drosophila melanogaster AAGAGAG satellite sequence is present at each chromosome centromere of the fly. We demonstrate here how, under nearly physiological pH conditions, these sequences can form a pyrimidine triple helix containing T·A-T and CCu·G-C base triplets, stabilized by Cu2+ metal ions in amounts mirroring in vivo concentrations. Ultraviolet experiments were used to monitor the triple helix formation at pH 7.2 in presence of Cu2+ ions. Triplex melting is observed at 23°C. Furthermore, a characteristic signature of triple helix formation was obtained by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The stabilization of the C·G-C base triplets at pH 7.2 is shown to occur via interactions of Cu2+ ions on the third strand cytosine N3 atom and on the guanine N7 atom of the polypurine target strand forming CCu·G-C triplets. Under the same neutral pH conditions in absence of Cu2+ ions, the triple helix fails to form. Possible biological implications are discussed. INTRODUCTION Various divalent metal ions are known to interact with nucleic acids both in vitro and in vivo (1). Most investigations underlined the important role of metal ions in various functions of DNA in vivo. For example these metal ions can influence the synthesis rate and the accuracy of the nucleotide sequence in DNA—and RNA—polymerase systems (2), participate in the formation of protein nucleic acid complexes (3), promote non-B DNA structures (4,5), or even cause mutagenesis and carcinogenesis (2,6). It has been well known for a long time that, in vivo, traces of divalent metal ions are preferentially bound to reiterative DNA sequences (7) and since such DNA sequences are essentially present in constitutive heterochromatin areas it was interesting to consider more precisely the properties of these sequences and their function, taking into account the presence of metal ions at some steps of the mitotic cycle. Constitutive heterochromatin areas occupy identical positions in homologous chromosomes and were first distinguished from euchromatin areas on the basis of differential staining with banding techniques (8). Heterochromatin is especially abundant at the centromeres and telomeres. It is composed of highly reiterated sequences called satellite DNA, characterized by their unusual base composition and nature. For example, in Drosophila melanogaster, heterochromatin accounts for an estimated 33.5% of the female genome with satellite repeats representing 21% of the genome (9,10). Progress has been made in the understanding of the sequence and molecular organization of Drosophila (9,11,12) and human (13) centromeres, yet our understanding of their higher structural organization and function is still very limited. Molecular and genetic properties that further distinguish heterochromatin from euchromatin include condensation throughout the cell cycle, late replicating during S phase, and faster replicating DNA leading to a good synchrony of its replication, transcriptional inactivity, sequence composition, and greater contents of metal ions (6). Among these metal ions, copper seems to play an important role in heterochromatin structure and function (2,6). The binding of Cu2+ to DNA appears to be highly cooperative and related to DNA denaturation. Moreover the Cu2+ binding is concentration dependent. At very low metal concentration Cu2+ binds nonspecifically to the phosphate groups like most other ions. Upon increasing concentration, the Cu2+ ions begin to reach the bases mostly by chelation with the N7 of guanine. When metal ion concentration reaches 0.7 atom/nucleotide, the double helix is opened, and DNA denaturation begins (2,6,14,15). Several models have been proposed to describe the Cu2+ binding to double-stranded DNA that we will not discuss here (7,16). Considering these properties, it is clear that Cu2+ binding to DNA can influence the structures and the functions of heterochromatic areas in vivo in various ways. For example Cu2+ can cause DNA helix-coil transition—thus facilitating replication, inducing errors during translation—or even be implicated in carcinogenesis (6,7). On the other hand, copper is known to be able, like other divalent cations, to promote and stabilize non-B DNA structures (5,16–18) and even triple helices (19). A DNA triplex is formed upon binding of a pyrimidine or a purine single-stranded DNA to the major groove of a double helix, forming Hoogsteen or reverse-Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds with the purine strand of the duplex. Triplex DNA comes in three structural classes that differ in the base composition of the third strand, the relative orientation of the phosphodiester backbones, the sensitivity to pH and cations (4,17), and thermodynamic parameters (20). They have been described as the (C, T) or pyrimidine motif, the (G, A) or purine motif, and the (G, T) motif. These motifs can form both intramolecularly, giving H DNA, and intermolecularly with triple helix-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs). In the pyrimidine motif, the third strand is composed of cytosines and thymines and binds parallel to the purine strand of the duplex by Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of T·A-T and C+·G-C triplets (21,22). (In the triple helix notation, the (·) represents the hydrogen bonds between the third strand and the target duplex; the (-) represents the Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds.) Formation of this motif requires slightly acidic conditions (21,22). In the purine motif, the third strand is composed of guanines and adenines and binds antiparallel to the purine strand of the duplex by reverse-Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of A·A-T and G·G-C triplets (21–23). This motif contains no protonated bases and its stability is therefore pH independent; however its formation generally requires divalent (Mg2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, etc.) (17) or multivalent cations (spermine, spermidine) (22). In the (G, T) motif the third strand is composed of guanines and thymines and binds parallel or antiparallel to the purine strand of the duplex, depending on the number of TpG steps in the third strand (24–26). We have recently shown using electrophoretic mobility shift assay experiments that low concentrations of Cu2+ can promote the formation and stabilization of a pyrimidine triplex with D. melanogaster satellite repeats under nearly physiological condition (i.e., mostly neutral pH), bypassing the protonation requisite of the third strand cytosines (19). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has been widely used for investigating metals in interaction with DNA (15,27,28) and is known to be an appropriate technique to evidence the formation of triple helical structures and to determine many of their characteristics (basepairing, sugar geometries, etc.) (29,30). In this work we investigate by FTIR and ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopies the in vitro formation of a pyrimidine triplex at neutral pH in presence of Cu2+ by the D. melanogaster satellite sequence (AAGAGAG)n=2. We then propose a mechanism by which the Cu2+ ions can overcome the protonation requisite for classical pyrimidine motif triple helices and promote the triple helix formation at neutral pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS Oligonucleotides The oligonucleotides were synthesized on an automatic Applied Biosystems 3400 synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using controlled pore glass beads support and the phosphoramidite chemistry. After synthesis the oligonucleotides were cleaved from the support by concentrated ammonia at room temperature and then deprotected overnight at 55°C always in ammonia. After evaporation to dryness, the oligonucleotides were desalted on a G10 Sephadex column and then purified twice by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a reverse phase C18 column using gradient CH3CN in TEAAc buffer. The purified oligonucleotides were then exchanged into sodium salt on a Dowex Na+ column and lyophilized. Purity was checked by analytical HPLC, capillar electrophoresis, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight. For vibrational spectroscopy three 14-mer deoxyoligonucleotides were synthesized with the following sequences:
Concentrations of oligonucleotides were estimated by UV absorption measurements at 85°C using a nearest-neighbor approximation for the absorption coefficients (32). All concentrations are expressed in strand molarities. UV spectroscopy Absorbance versus temperature cooling and heating curves were obtained using a UVIKON 940 (Kontron, Paris, France) spectrophotometer as previously described (19). The temperature of the bath was increased or decreased at a rate of 0.1°C/min, thus allowing complete thermal equilibrium of the cells. At each temperature, absorbance measurements were performed at 245, 260, and 330 nm (control wavelength). Data were extracted from the profiles recorded at 260 nm. Unless otherwise specified, all experiments were performed in 10 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 6.0 or 7.2) containing 25 mM KCl and between 0 and 35 μM CuCl2 (0–0.5 copper ions/nucleotide). For triplex experiments strand concentrations were 1 μM for the duplex and 1.2 μM for the third strand. Tm was determined as described in Rougée et al. (33). In all UV experiments, the extended target duplex was used shifting, as previously described (19), the duplex melting toward higher temperatures to distinguish triplex from duplex transition. Infrared spectroscopy The 14RY duplexes were preformed and annealed at 95°C for 10 min. The desired amount of Cu2+ ions (CuCl2 solution) was then added. Finally an equimolecular amount of third strand (in the same buffer as the duplex) was added. Samples were studied in H2O and in D2O solutions at a strand concentration around 10 μM. They were deposited between two ZnSe windows without spacer. Deuteration experiments were performed by drying the samples under nitrogen and redissolving them in identical volumes of D2O (>99.8% purity, Euriso-Top; CEA, Saclay, France). FTIR spectra were recorded using a Perkin Elmer 2000 spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) at a 1-cm−1 resolution. Five scans were accumulated. Data treatment was performed using the Perkin Elmer spectrum program. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION UV melting curve analysis Formation of pyrimidine triple helices can be monitored by following the UV absorbance. We first performed melting experiments with the same 14-basepair duplex (14RY) as used in infrared experiments. Under these conditions triplex and duplex melting transitions appeared to be intermingled, prohibiting an accurate Tm determination. We thus chose to use a 26-basepair duplex to shift the duplex transition to higher temperatures. All Tm values are reported in Table 1, and melting curves for some conditions are illustrated in Fig. 1
Curves a and b are controls showing the behavior with increasing temperature of the third 14TC TFO strand alone at pH 6 (curve a) and at pH 7.2 in presence of 0.5 Cu2+ ion/nucleotide (curve b). In both cases no transition is detected, showing that no third strand association occurs under the conditions used to prepare the triplexes. At pH 6.0 in 25 mM KCl, for the equimolecular mixture of the 26RY duplex and the 14TC third strand a classical pyrimidine triple helix melting curve is obtained (Fig. 1 At pH 7.2 in 25 mM KCl when the 26RY duplex is mixed with the 14TC TFO, no transition due to the formation of a triple helix can be evidenced (Table 1, column 4). Under the same conditions and in presence of Cu2+ ions with a ratio of 0.15 and 0.33 Cu2+/nucleotide, still only monophasic melting curves are obtained, corresponding to the 26RY duplex transition (Table 1, columns 5 and 6, curves not shown). At a ratio of 0.5 Cu2+ ions/nucleotides a biphasic melting curve is recorded (Fig. 1 In presence of copper the triplex transition at 23°C appears perfectly reversible upon association (cooling) and dissociation (heating) (Fig. 1 Thus UV experiments show that Cu2+ ions are able to stabilize a triple helix formed by the (AAGAGAG)n=2 Drosophila satellite repeats at neutral pH. To further investigate the mechanism of this stabilization, we have studied this triple helix by vibrational spectroscopy, which allows us to probe different putative interaction sites in nucleic acid structures. Vibrational spectroscopy Binding of copper ions on the 14TC oligonucleotide Fig. 2
Effect of copper ions on the targeted duplex Fig. 2, d–f
Triple helix formation at neutral pH stabilized by copper ions In pyrimidine motif triplexes T·A-T and C+·G-C bases triplets are expected to form (Fig. 4, a and b
The progressive addition of Cu2+ ions to the equimolecular mixture 14RY + 14TC enables the stabilization of a triple helix under conditions of neutral pH. We clearly observe in spectrum 5 d recorded in presence of 0.5 Cu2+ ions/nucleotide all the characteristic features described above: decrease of the relative intensities of the 1623 and 1637 cm−1 bands (formation of the T·A-T triplets) and emergence of a band at 1702 cm−1. Cu2+ ions are thus able to stabilize the triple helix at neutral pH. Localization of the copper ions stabilizing the triple helix The formation of the C·G-C base triplets is thus made possible by the presence of copper ions without protonation of the N3 atom. Different binding sites are possible for Cu2+ ions, enabling this binding of the third strand cytosine to the guanine of the target polypurine strand. The proposed binding model (Fig. 4 c In the first place, it can be seen that the C6=O6 guanine stretching band located at 1674 cm−1 in the duplex spectrum (Fig. 2 d Second, in the spectrum of the triple helix formed at neutral pH in presence of Cu2+ ions (Fig. 5 d The emergence of a band located at 1582 cm−1 is also detected in the spectrum of the triple helix formed in presence of Cu2+ ions (Fig. 5 d
Now, addition of the third strand to this duplex in presence of copper ions leads to the formation of the triple helix (all characteristic marker bands of triplexes discussed above are observed; see spectrum 5 e). In the spectrum of the triplex formed with the selectively deuterated purines recorded in H2O solution (Fig. 6 d Thus, in the triple helix, the Cu2+ ions interact on one hand with the N3 atoms of cytosines and on the other with the N7 atoms of guanines. We propose therefore that they stabilize the formation of the triple helix at neutral pH (Fig. 4 c CONCLUSION Mechanism of copper-mediated pyrimidic triplex formation: CCu·G-C We confirm in this study, by two different techniques (UV and IR spectroscopies), that copper ions can promote the formation of a parallel pyrimidine triplex in vitro under near physiological conditions. We thus demonstrate that the classical Hoogsteen hydrogen bond between the N3 atom of the protonated cytosine in the third strand and the N7 atom of the guanine in the duplex is replaced by a copper ion as shown in Fig. 4 c Biological relevance of triplexes in heterochromatin A question that arises here is: Can triple helices, or H-DNA, be formed in vivo in centromeric regions? Some studies have shown that TFOs can be hybridized in situ to nondenatured metaphase spreads and interphase nuclei (44) and that triplex-forming DNAs in the human interphase nucleus can be visualized with DNA probes and anti-triplex antibodies (45). Our results show that, in principle, the Drosophila AG-rich satellite is able to form a triple helix. Yet, a major restriction (the necessity of an acidic pH) could prevent the formation of this pyrimidine triple strand structure in vivo. We demonstrate in this study that pH dependence can be overcome by relatively low Cu2+ concentrations. It is conceivable that some intracellular mechanisms can locally increase divalent metal ions concentrations to levels comparable with our experimental conditions. For example, it is known that metal ions are naturally present in in vivo DNA (18) and concentrated in centromeric reiterated sequences (2,7). Thus, high local concentrations of divalent cations can be achieved via their natural binding to such sequences. Another mechanism by which the triplex-modulatory effects that we have observed with naked transition metal cations could be accomplished naturally in vivo is the interaction with a metal cation coordinated to a specialized peptide domain (46) or by a conjugate such as iminodiacetic acid (47) or glutamic acid (48). Our data have been obtained using a twice-repeated AAGAGAG target sequence of the D. melanogaster satellite DNA. In vivo the sequence is found repeated thousands of times. We have previously shown (19) that an increase in the number of repeats drastically increases the triplex stability. Thus we can reasonably propose that the formation of a stable copper-induced triplex in vivo may be compatible with the environmental conditions naturally encountered by D. melanogaster (49). Thus the data presented herein support the concept that triplex-favorable local conditions of the micronuclear environment and therefore triple-stranded DNA can exist in vivo. The study of the effect of other metal ions on the stabilization of triple helices in D. melanogaster satellite repeats is now under progress. Acknowledgments We are grateful to Dr. C. Herve du Penhoat for proofreading the manuscript. J. Lacoste would like to thank EA and EG. References 1. Sorokin, V. A., V. A. Valeev, G. O. Gladchenko, I. V. Sysa, Y. P. Blagoi, and I. V. Volchok. 1996. Interaction of bivalent copper, nickel, manganese ions with native DNA and its monomers. J. Inorg. Biochem. 63:79–98. [PubMed] 2. Guillé, E., J. Grisvard, and I. Sissoëff. 1979. Implications of reiterative DNA-metal ion complexes in the induction and development of neoplastic cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1:299–311. 3. Coogan, T. P., D. M. Latta, R. J. Imbra, and M. Costa. 1989. Effect of nickel(II) on DNA-protein interactions. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 21:13–21. [PubMed] 4. Bernues, J., R. Beltran, J. M. Casasnovas, and F. Azorin. 1990. DNA-sequence and metal-ion specificity of the formation of *H-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:4067–4073. [PubMed] 5. Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D., and S. M. Mirkin. 1995. Triplex DNA structures. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:65–95. [PubMed] 6. Guillé, E., J. Grisvard, and I. Sissoëff. 1981. Structure and function of metallo-DNA in the living cell. In Systemic Aspects of Biocompatibility. D. Williams, editor. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 39–141. 7. Sissoeff, I., J. Grisvard, and E. Guillé. 1976. Studies on metal ions-DNA interactions: specific behaviour of reiterative DNA sequences. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 31:165–199. [PubMed] 8. Heitz, E. 1928. Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 69:762–818. 9. Hoskins, R. A., C. D. Smith, J. W. Carlson, A. B. Carvalho, A. Halpern, J. S. Kaminker, C. Kennedy, C. J. Mungall, B. A. Sullivan, G. G. Sutton, J. C. Yasuhara, B. T. Wakimoto, E. W. Myers, S. E. Celniker, G. M. Rubin, and G. H. Karpen. 2002. Heterochromatic sequences in a Drosophila whole-genome shotgun assembly. Genome Biol. 3:research0085.0081–0085.0016. [PubMed] 10. Verma, R. S. 1988. Heterochromatin. Molecular and Structural Aspects. R. S. Verma, editor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 11. Sun, X., J. Wahlstrom, and G. Karpen. 1997. Molecular structure of a functional Drosophila centromere. Cell. 91:1007–1019. [PubMed] 12. Sun, X., H. D. Le, J. M. Wahlstrom, and G. H. Karpen. 2003. Sequence analysis of a functional Drosophila centromere. Genome Res. 13:182–194. [PubMed] 13. Horvath, J. E., S. Schwartz, and E. E. Eichler. 2000. The mosaic structure of human pericentromeric DNA: a strategy for characterizing complex regions of the human genome. Genome Res. 10:839–852. [PubMed] 14. Tajmir-Riahi, H. A., M. Naoui, and R. Ahmad. 1993. The effects of Cu2+ and Pb2+ on the solution structure of calf thymus DNA: DNA condensation and denaturation studied by Fourier transform IR difference spectroscopy. Biopolymers. 33:1819–1827. [PubMed] 15. Andrushchenko, V., J. H. van de Sande, and H. Wieser. 2003. Vibrational circular dichroism and IR absorption of DNA complexes with Cu2+ ions. Biopolymers. 72:374–390. [PubMed] 16. Zimmer, C., G. Luck, H. Fritzsche, and H. Triebel. 1971. DNA-copper (II) complex and the DNA conformation. Biopolymers. 10:441–463. [PubMed] 17. Malkov, V. A., O. N. Voloshin, V. N. Soyfer, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 1993. Cation and sequence effects on stability of intermolecular pyrimidine-purine-purine triplex. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:585–591. [PubMed] 18. Sagripanti, J. L., P. L. Goering, and A. Lamanna. 1991. Interaction of copper with DNA and antagonism by other metals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 110:477–485. [PubMed] 19. Horn, V., L. Lacroix, T. Gautier, M. Takasugi, J. L. Mergny, and J. Lacoste. 2004. Triple helix formation with Drosophila satellite repeats. Unexpected stabilization by copper ions. Biochemistry. 43:11196–11205. [PubMed] 20. Mills, M., P. B. Arimondo, L. Lacroix, T. Garestier, C. Hélène, H. Klump, and J. L. Mergny. 1999. Energetics of strand-displacement reactions in triple helices: a spectroscopic study. J. Mol. Biol. 291:1035–1054. [PubMed] 21. Le Doan, T., L. Perrouault, D. Praseuth, N. Habhoub, J. L. Decout, N. T. Thuong, J. Lhomme, and C. Helene. 1987. Sequence-specific recognition, photocrosslinking and cleavage of the DNA double helix by an oligo-[alpha]-thymidylate covalently linked to an azidoproflavine derivative. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:7749–7760. [PubMed] 22. Moser, H. E., and P. B. Dervan. 1987. Sequence-specific cleavage of double helical DNA by triple helix formation. Science. 238:645–650. [PubMed] 23. Beal, P. A., and P. B. Dervan. 1991. Second structural motif for recognition of DNA by oligonucleotide-directed triple-helix formation. Science. 251:1360–1363. [PubMed] 24. Mills, M., L. Lacroix, P. B. Arimondo, J. L. Leroy, J. C. Francois, H. Klump, and J. L. Mergny. 2002. Unusual DNA conformations: implications for telomeres. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Canc. Agents. 2:627–644. 25. Chan, P. P., and P. M. Glazer. 1997. Triplex DNA: fundamentals, advances, and potential applications for gene therapy. J. Mol. Med. 75:267–282. [PubMed] 26. Sun, J. S., T. De Bizemont, G. Duval-Valentin, T. Montenay-Garestier, and C. Helene. 1991. Extension of the range of recognition sequences for triple helix formation by oligonucleotides containing guanines and thymines. C. R. Acad. Sci. III. 313:585–590. [PubMed] 27. Adam, S., P. Bourtayre, J. Liquier, and E. Taillandier. 1986. Interaction of transition metal ions with Z form poly d(A-C).poly d(G-T) and poly d(A-T) studied by I.R. spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:3501–3513. [PubMed] 28. Adam, S., P. Bourtayre, J. Liquier, J. A. Taboury, and E. Taillandier. 1987. Poly[d(A-T)-Cs+] conformations studied by IR spectroscopy. Biopolymers. 26:251–260. [PubMed] 29. Taillandier, E., and J. Liquier. 1992. Infrared spectroscopy of DNA. Methods Enzymol. 211:307–335. [PubMed] 30. Tsuboi, M., K. Shuto, S. Takemura, and S. Nishimura. 1969. Infrared spectra of a few transfer ribonucleic acids. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 42:102–107. [PubMed] 31. Taboury, J., J. Liquier, and E. Taillandier. 1985. Characterization of DNA structures by infrared spectroscopy: double helical forms of poly (dG-dC), poly (dD8G-dC) and poly (dG-dm5C). Can. J. Chem. 63:1904–1909. 32. Cantor, C. R., M. M. Warshaw, and H. Shapiro. 1970. Oligonucleotide interactions. 3. Circular dichroism studies of the conformation of deoxyoligonucleotides. Biopolymers. 9:1059–1077. [PubMed] 33. Rougée, M., B. Faucon, J. L. Mergny, F. Barcelo, C. Giovannangeli, T. Garestier, and C. Hélène. 1992. Kinetics and thermodynamics of triple-helix formation: effects of ionic strength and mismatches. Biochemistry. 31:9269–9278. [PubMed] 34. Taillandier, E., and J. Liquier. 2002. Vibrational spectroscopy of nucleic acids. In Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy. J. M. Chalmers and P. R. Griffith, editors. John Wiley. 3465–3480. 35. Rush III, T., H. Yong, and W. L. Peticolas. 1997. Structure and stability of cytosine deoxyoligonucleotides multiplexes. Biopolymers. 41:121–130. 36. Eichhorn, G. L., P. Clark, and E. D. Becker. 1966. Interactions of metal ions with polynucleotides and related compounds. VII. The binding of copper(II) to nucleosides, nucleotides, and deoxyribonucleic acids. Biochemistry. 5:245–253. [PubMed] 37. Fritzsche, H., and C. Zimmer. 1968. Infrared studies of deoxyribonucleic acids, their constituents and analogues. 4. The binding sites of copper(II) in DNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 5:42–44. [PubMed] 38. Hackl, E. V., S. V. Kornilova, and Y. P. Blagoi. 2005. DNA structural transitions induced by divalent metal ions in aqueous solutions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 35:175–191. [PubMed] 39. Liquier, J., P. Coffinier, M. Firon, and E. Taillandier. 1991. Triple helical polynucleotidic structures: sugar conformations determined by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 9:437–445. [PubMed] 40. Dagneaux, C., J. Liquier, and E. Taillandier. 1995. FTIR study of a nonclassical dT10*dA10-dT10 intramolecular triple helix. Biochemistry. 34:14815–14818. [PubMed] 41. Guzman, M. R., J. Liquier, and E. Taillandier. 2005. Hydration and conformational transitions in DNA, RNA, and mixed DNA-RNA triplexes studied by gravimetry and FTIR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 23:331–339. [PubMed] 42. Akhebat, A., C. Dagneaux, J. Liquier, and E. Taillandier. 1992. Triple helical polynucleotidic structures: an FTIR study of the C+ .G. Ctriplet. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 10:577–588. [PubMed] 43. Liquier, J., and E. Taillandier. 1996. Infrared spectroscopy of nucleic acids. In Infrared Spectroscopy of Biomolecules. H. H. Mantsch and D. J. Chapman, editors. Wiley-Liss. 44. Johnson 3rd, M. D., and J. R. Fresco. 1999. Third-strand in situ hybridization (TISH) to non-denatured metaphase spreads and interphase nuclei. Chromosoma. 108:181–189. [PubMed] 45. Ohno, M., T. Fukagawa, J. S. Lee, and T. Ikemura. 2002. Triplex-forming DNAs in the human interphase nucleus visualized in situ by polypurine/polypyrimidine DNA probes and antitriplex antibodies. Chromosoma. 111:201–213. [PubMed] 46. Eichhorn, G. L., P. P. Chuknyisky, J. J. Butzow, R. B. Beal, C. Garland, C. P. Janzen, P. Clark, and E. Tarien. 1994. A structural model for fidelity in transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:7613–7617. [PubMed] 47. Sueda, S., T. Ihara, and M. Takaki. 1997. Metallo-regulation of DNA triple helix formation through cooperative dimerization of two oligonucleotides. Chem. Letter. 26:1085–1088. 48. Ihara, T., Y. Takeda, and A. Jyo. 2001. Metal ion-directed cooperative triple helix formation of glutamic acid-oligonucleotide conjugate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:1772–1773. [PubMed] 49. James, A. C., R. B. Azevedo, and L. Partridge. 1997. Genetic and environmental responses to temperature of Drosophila melanogaster from a latitudinal cline. Genetics. 146:881–890. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
J Inorg Biochem. 1996 Aug 1; 63(2):79-98.
[J Inorg Biochem. 1996]Biol Trace Elem Res. 1989 Jul-Sep; 21():13-21.
[Biol Trace Elem Res. 1989]Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 25; 18(14):4067-73.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1990]Annu Rev Biochem. 1995; 64():65-95.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 1995]Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1976; 31(2):165-99.
[Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1976]Genome Biol. 2002; 3(12):RESEARCH0085.
[Genome Biol. 2002]Cell. 1997 Dec 26; 91(7):1007-19.
[Cell. 1997]Genome Res. 2003 Feb; 13(2):182-94.
[Genome Res. 2003]Genome Res. 2000 Jun; 10(6):839-52.
[Genome Res. 2000]Biopolymers. 1993 Dec; 33(12):1819-27.
[Biopolymers. 1993]Biopolymers. 2003; 72(5):374-90.
[Biopolymers. 2003]Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1976; 31(2):165-99.
[Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1976]Biopolymers. 1971; 10(3):441-63.
[Biopolymers. 1971]Annu Rev Biochem. 1995; 64():65-95.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 1995]Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 25; 18(14):4067-73.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1990]Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11; 21(3):585-91.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1993]J Mol Biol. 1999 Sep 3; 291(5):1035-54.
[J Mol Biol. 1999]Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Oct 12; 15(19):7749-60.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1987]Science. 1987 Oct 30; 238(4827):645-50.
[Science. 1987]Biochemistry. 2004 Sep 7; 43(35):11196-205.
[Biochemistry. 2004]Biopolymers. 2003; 72(5):374-90.
[Biopolymers. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Apr 25; 14(8):3501-13.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1986]Biopolymers. 1987 Feb; 26(2):251-60.
[Biopolymers. 1987]Methods Enzymol. 1992; 211():307-35.
[Methods Enzymol. 1992]Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1969 Jan; 42(1):102-7.
[Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1969]Biopolymers. 1970; 9(9):1059-77.
[Biopolymers. 1970]Biochemistry. 2004 Sep 7; 43(35):11196-205.
[Biochemistry. 2004]Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 29; 31(38):9269-78.
[Biochemistry. 1992]Biochemistry. 2004 Sep 7; 43(35):11196-205.
[Biochemistry. 2004]Biochemistry. 2004 Sep 7; 43(35):11196-205.
[Biochemistry. 2004]Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 29; 31(38):9269-78.
[Biochemistry. 1992]Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1969 Jan; 42(1):102-7.
[Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1969]Biochemistry. 1966 Jan; 5(1):245-53.
[Biochemistry. 1966]Biopolymers. 1971; 10(3):441-63.
[Biopolymers. 1971]Eur J Biochem. 1968 Jun; 5(1):42-4.
[Eur J Biochem. 1968]Int J Biol Macromol. 2005 Apr; 35(3-4):175-91.
[Int J Biol Macromol. 2005]Biopolymers. 2003; 72(5):374-90.
[Biopolymers. 2003]J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1991 Dec; 9(3):437-45.
[J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1991]J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2005 Dec; 23(3):331-9.
[J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2005]J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1992 Dec; 10(3):577-88.
[J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1992]Chromosoma. 1999 Jul; 108(3):181-9.
[Chromosoma. 1999]Chromosoma. 2002 Sep; 111(3):201-13.
[Chromosoma. 2002]Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1991 Sep 15; 110(3):477-85.
[Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1991]Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1976; 31(2):165-99.
[Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1976]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2; 91(16):7613-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Feb 28; 123(8):1772-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2001]Biochemistry. 2004 Sep 7; 43(35):11196-205.
[Biochemistry. 2004]Genetics. 1997 Jul; 146(3):881-90.
[Genetics. 1997]