![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Requirements for Cdk7 in the assembly of Cdk1/cyclin B and activation of Cdk2 revealed by chemical genetics in human cells 1 Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 2 Programs in Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 3 Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 4Correspondence: Email: r-fisher/at/ski.mskcc.org Summary Cell division is controlled by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). In metazoans, S-phase onset coincides with activation of Cdk2, whereas Cdk1 triggers mitosis. Both Cdk1 and -2 require cyclin-binding and T-loop phosphorylation for full activity. The only known CDK-activating kinase (CAK) in metazoans is Cdk7, which is also part of the transcription machinery. To test the requirements for Cdk7 in vivo, we replaced wild-type Cdk7 with a version sensitive to bulky ATP analogs in human cancer cells. Selective inhibition of Cdk7 in G1 prevents activation (but not formation) of Cdk2/cyclin complexes and delays S phase. Inhibiting Cdk7 in G2 blocks entry to mitosis, and disrupts Cdk1/cyclin B complex assembly, indicating that the two steps of Cdk1 activation—cyclin-binding and T-loop phosphorylation—are mutually dependent. Therefore, by combining chemical genetics and homologous gene replacement in somatic cells, we reveal different modes of CDK activation by Cdk7 at two distinct execution points in the cell cycle. Introduction The cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that promote chromosome duplication in S phase and segregation at mitosis require binding of cyclin and phosphorylation on the activation segment (T-loop) by a CDK-activating kinase (CAK) for full activity (reviewed by Morgan, 1997). Despite universal conservation of this two-step pathway, the organization of the CAK-CDK network—and the identity of CAK—have diverged (reviewed by Fisher, 2005). In metazoans, the only CAK identified to date is the Cdk7/cyclin H/Mat1 complex, which is also a component of the RNA polymerase (Pol) II general transcription factor (TF) IIH. Cdk7 has evolved two distinct recognition mechanisms for its structurally dissimilar substrates—the T-loops of CDKs and the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of Pol II—to accomplish its dual functions (Larochelle et al., 2006). The ortholog of Cdk7 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Kin28 complex, is a CTD kinase contained in TFIIH (Feaver et al., 1994), but is devoid of CAK activity (Cismowski et al., 1995). CDK activation is instead catalyzed by Cak1, a single-subunit kinase related only distantly to CDKs (Espinoza et al., 1996; Kaldis et al., 1996; Thuret et al., 1996). The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has two CAKs: the essential Mcs6 complex and the nonessential Csk1, orthologous to the metazoan and budding yeast enzymes, respectively (Hermand et al., 1998; Lee et al., 1999; Saiz and Fisher, 2002). In budding yeast, the same CAK is required at both G1/S and G2/M transitions (Sutton and Freiman, 1997). The situation in metazoans is less clear. Cdk7 phosphorylates both Cdk1 and -2 selectively in human cell extracts (Larochelle et al., 2006), and either partial depletion of Cdk7 by RNA interference (RNAi) or near-quantitative immunodepletion with specific antibodies causes a proportional reduction in the Cdk2-activating capacity of a whole-cell extract (Wohlbold et al., 2006). CDK activation appears defective in cdk7 temperature-sensitive mutants of both Drosophila melanogaster (Larochelle et al., 1998) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Wallenfang and Seydoux, 2002), but in each case cell-cycle progression is blocked only at mitosis, not at S phase. T-loop phosphorylation of Cdk2 persists, moreover, in Drosophila cdk7 mutants at restrictive temperature (Larochelle et al., 1998). These observations, and the detection of minor CAK activities in vitro (Kaldis and Solomon, 2000; Liu et al., 2004), left open the possibility that another CAK exists in animal cells. Therefore, absent a genetic test of its function in vivo, the role of Cdk7 as the major or sole CAK in mammalian cells remained unproven (Abbas and Dutta, 2006). Genetic studies of mammalian Cdk7 have been complicated by the enzyme’s dual roles in cell division and transcription. Mice lacking the Mat1 subunit of the Cdk7 complex die early in embryogenesis, which established that the complex was essential but limited analysis of the accompanying biochemical defects (Rossi et al., 2001). RNAi-mediated depletion of Cdk7 by ~70% in human cells produces no obvious phenotype (Wohlbold et al., 2006). We therefore took a chemical-genetic approach—the introduction into cells of a mutant kinase engineered to accommodate bulky, unnatural ATP analogs in its active site—to discern the functions of human Cdk7 in vivo. Expansion of the ATP-binding pocket by mutation of Phe91 to a glycine residue renders the kinase analog-selective and –sensitive (as) (Larochelle et al., 2006). In a previous study, we identified seven of ~10–15 protein substrates of Cdk7 in HeLa cell nuclear extracts, including Cdk1, Cdk2, Cdk4 and Pol II, by phosphorylation with Cdk7as and a radiolabeled substrate analog (Larochelle et al., 2006). The mutant enzyme was inhibited by a non-hydrolyzable analog with an IC50 ~17 nM, whereas the wild-type kinase was unaffected. The apparent KmATP of Cdk7as was ~sixfold higher than that of wild-type Cdk7, but below the likely intracellular ATP concentration, and the mutation did not affect enzyme turnover, suggesting that the mutant kinase would retain function in vivo (Larochelle et al., 2006). Here we introduce Cdk7as into human colon cancer cells by homologous gene replacement. Cells expressing only Cdk7as are sensitive to growth inhibition by bulky, non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs. Inactivation of Cdk7as in synchronous cell populations rapidly impedes CDK activation and cell-cycle progression. Selective inhibition of Cdk7as during G1 curtails activating phosphorylation of Cdk2 and delays S phase entry, proving that Cdk7 is the Cdk2-activating kinase in vivo. Inhibition of Cdk7as during S/G2 progression prevents mitotic entry and abolishes Cdk1 activation by an unexpected mechanism: disrupted binding of Cdk1 to cyclin B. The block to complex assembly due to Cdk7-inhibition is reproduced in extracts of the mutant cells. Because Cdk1 requires a cyclin partner to be phosphorylated efficiently by Cdk7 (Fisher and Morgan, 1994), our results indicate that the two obligate steps in Cdk1 activation—cyclin-binding and phosphorylation by CAK—are mutually dependent and therefore likely to occur in concert. Results Engineered sensitivity to single-kinase inhibition in a human colon cancer cell To replace wild-type Cdk7 with Cdk7as, we performed homology-directed gene replacement in HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells, with recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors (Kohli et al., 2004) (Figure 1A
To confirm that Cdk7as expressed in HCT116 cells was functional, we measured phosphorylation in whole-cell extracts supplemented with the radioactive substrate analog, N6-(benzyl)-ATP (Figure 1C To test whether Cdk7as expressed endogenously in human cells was sensitive to inhibition by the non-hydrolyzable analog 1-NMPP1, as was the recombinant enzyme expressed with baculoviruses and purified from insect cells (Larochelle et al., 2006), we immunoprecipitated Cdk7 from Cdk7as/as or Cdk7+/+ cells and tested its kinase activity towards both a Pol II CTD-containing fusion protein (GST-CTD) and human Cdk2. Cdk7 recovered from the mutant, but not the wild-type, cells was inhibited by 1-NMPP1, with an IC50 of ~50 nM with either substrate (Figure 1D We observed dose-dependent decreases in phosphorylation of Cdk1 and -2, detected by phospho-T-loop-specific antibodies, with addition of 1-NMPP1 to Cdk7as/as cells (Figure 1F Cdk7 inhibition during G1 delays S phase entry To test whether Cdk7 activity is required during G1, we synchronized wild-type or Cdk7as/as HCT116 cells by serum withdrawal for 48 h. Cells of either genotype released from serum starvation in the absence of drugs proceeded synchronously through G1, entered S phase in ~8–10 h and began to accumulate with a G2 DNA content by 15 h. Addition of 10 μM 1-NMPP1 retarded G1/S progression by the mutant but not the wild-type cells (Figure 2A, C
Cdk7 is a Cdk2-activating kinase in vivo To determine whether the S-phase delay was due to a CAK defect, we monitored Cdk2 T-loop phosphorylation over time after serum stimulation in mock- (DMSO-) or 1-NMPP1-treated, wild-type and Cdk7as/as cells (Figure 2B, D In the mock-treated mutant cells, Cdk2 T-loop phosphorylation and associated kinase activity continued to rise for at least 14 h after release (Figure 2B
We also measured levels of cyclins and CDK inhibitors (CKIs) after serum stimulation. During G1, levels of cyclin E, which are known to be elevated in HCT116 cells (Lu et al., 2000), remained more-or-less constant in both mock- and 1-NMPP1-treated cells of either genotype. Cyclin A gradually accumulated in G1 and S phase in the mock-treated mutant cells; the increase was attenuated by addition of 1-NMPP1 (Figures 2B The rapid arrest and reversal of Cdk2 T-loop phosphorylation (and the modest, delayed effects on cyclin and CKI levels) suggested direct inhibition of CAK by the analog. To rule out an indirect, transcriptional mechanism, we compared effects of 1-NMPP1—on cell cycle progression, cyclin A accumulation, Cdk2/cyclin A complex formation and Cdk2 phosphorylation—with those of the DNA intercalator actinomycin D, which represses transcription globally in mammalian cells (Lam et al., 2001). Actinomycin D arrested the cell cycle when added with, or 3 or 6 h after, serum (Supplemental Figure 3), and was at least as potent as 1-NMPP1 in limiting cyclin A accumulation by the end of the 15-h time course (Figure 3C Inhibiting Cdk7 during S/G2 prevents Cdk1 activation and mitotic entry To test the requirement for Cdk7 in mitosis, we pre-synchronized cells at the G1/S boundary with two sequential thymidine blocks. They were then released into medium lacking thymidine and monitored for DNA content by flow cytometry (Figure 4A
When 1-NMPP1 was added 6 h after release from a double-thymidine block, roughly equal populations of cells accumulated in G1 and G2 by the end of the experiment (Figure 4A We investigated the biochemical basis of the Cdk7 requirement, by measuring the kinetics of Cdk1 activation in cells released from a double-thymidine block into nocodazole-containing medium (Figures 4C, D Cdk7 activity is required for assembly of Cdk1/cyclin B complexes in vivo To determine the mechanism by which inhibition of Cdk7 prevented activation of Cdk1, we measured levels of total cyclin B and Cdk1/cyclin B complexes in cells treated with 1-NMPP1 at various times after release from a double-thymidine block. In mock-treated cells, cyclin B accumulated as cells progressed from G1/S into mitosis (Figure 5A
Because Cdk7-inhibition starting at 4 h diminished cyclin B levels measured 15 h after release from G1/S (Figure 5A These results suggested that CAK activity is required to assemble Cdk1/cyclin B complexes in vivo, even though they can form independent of T-loop phosphorylation in vitro (Desai et al., 1995). To test this idea, we attempted to drive Cdk1/cyclin B complex assembly in extracts from wild-type and Cdk7as/as HCT116 cells with an excess of purified, Myc epitope-tagged cyclin B. We measured assembly of the added cyclin B into active complexes with endogenous Cdk1 that could be immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibodies (Figure 6A
Discussion Cdk7 is the CDK-activating kinase in vivo By chemical genetics, we have demonstrated a requirement for Cdk7 to activate both Cdk1 and -2 in vivo. This validates the assignment of general CAK function to Cdk7, originally made on the basis of biochemical analyses but since questioned for lack of conclusive genetic proof (reviewed by Harper and Elledge, 1998; Abbas and Dutta, 2006). At least two other CDKs implicated in mammalian cell-cycle control—Cdk4 and -11—were among the proteins selectively phosphorylated by Cdk7as in crude extracts (Larochelle et al., 2006). Therefore, the metazoan cell-cycle machinery probably relies on a unitary T-loop phosphorylation system. That system appears to operate on two of its targets—Cdk1 and -2—with different kinetics in vivo, possibly explaining the different effects, on G1/S and G2/M transitions, of Cdk7-inhibition. During G2 progression, we could precisely define an execution point for Cdk7—a time after which CAK-inhibition was ineffectual in preventing mitotic entry. Prior to that point, the effect of inhibiting Cdk7, on Cdk1/cyclin B assembly and activation, was near-total. This is consistent with the observation that Cdk1 is dephosphorylated at each mitosis (Lorca et al., 1992), and the consequent requirement that it be phosphorylated de novo in G2, concomitant with cyclin-binding. In contrast, the G1/S transition was delayed but not completely blocked by Cdk7-inhibition imposed at any time within ~6 h after release from serum starvation; with increasing time after release, the delay grew shorter. Cdk2 phosphorylation is relatively stable; it persisted even during serum starvation and was slow to disappear in the absence of CAK activity (Figures 2 A CAK requirement in Cdk1/cyclin B assembly: implications for mitotic regulation We have gained an insight into mammalian cell-cycle control: efficient assembly of the mitotic CDK is not a simple function of cyclin B concentration, but depends also on the enzymatic activity of Cdk7. There is precedent in the case of Cdk1 and cyclin A, which require T-loop phosphorylation for their stable association in vitro (Desai et al., 1995) and in vivo (Larochelle et al., 1998). Similarly, a Cdk7/cyclin H/Mat1 complex can be formed, independent of T-loop phosphorylation, from recombinant subunits in vitro or by overexpression in vivo, but the unphosphorylated complex is thermolabile in vivo and in vitro (Larochelle et al., 2001). There is also crystallographic evidence that Cdk2/cyclin A complexes are stabilized by interaction between the T-loop phosphothreonine and conserved, basic residues of the cyclin (Russo et al., 1996). The binding energy provided by this interaction is not necessary for Cdk2 to form complexes with cyclins in vitro or, apparently, with cyclins A and E in vivo (Figure 3C It was suspected that the activity of Cdk7—the level of which remains constant throughout the cell cycle—is governed passively in vivo by availability of its protein substrates and/or stability of its phosphoprotein products, both determined primarily by cyclin-binding (reviewed by Morgan, 1997). Here we uncover a more complex relationship—mutual dependence—between the two, obligate steps of Cdk1 activation in vivo: cyclin-binding and T-loop phosphorylation. Cdk1/cyclin B assembly is also sensitive to inhibition of Cdk7 in whole-cell extracts of synchronized Cdk7as/as cells (Figure 6
Chemical genetics in human somatic cells In theory, an analog-sensitive version of any protein kinase can be engineered (Bishop et al., 2000) and expressed from its endogenous promoter by gene replacement with rAAV vectors (Papi et al., 2005). We combined the two strategies to investigate Cdk7—an attractive anti-cancer drug target because of its dual functions in gene expression and cell proliferation (Fisher, 2005; Lolli and Johnson, 2005). Phosphorylation of both Cdk1-Thr161 and Cdk2-Thr160 decreased after Cdk7 inhibition, in both time- and dose-dependent fashion, consistent with Cdk7 being the sole kinase responsible for CDK activation. In contrast, Ser5 of the Pol II CTD is targeted by multiple kinases in vitro (Ramanathan et al., 2001) and, apparently, in vivo. Inactivating Cdk7 led to an apparent increase in net phosphorylation by other Ser5 kinases, but produced a Pol II isoform of altered electrophoretic mobility (Figure 1F The chemical-genetic tools developed here can now be applied to investigate the connection between cell-division and transcription machineries maintained by Cdk7, in its dual roles as the CDK-activating and TFIIH-associated kinase (reviewed by Nigg, 1996; Fisher, 2005). The chemical-genetic approach ensures that cytotoxicity is Cdk7-specific, i.e. not due to off-target effects of the analog, and should therefore allow us to evaluate CAK/TFIIH as a possible therapeutic target in human cancer cells. The Cdk7as/as phenotype, moreover, will provide metrics—signatures of cell-cycle and transcriptional disruption—by which to evaluate potentially selective inhibitors of wild-type Cdk7 isolated through screens of chemical libraries. Experimental Procedures Gene targeting To introduce the F91G mutation (Larochelle et al., 2006), together with an EcoRI restriction site, into the cdk7 locus, 5’ and 3’ arms were PCR-amplified from a human BAC clone (RP11-124A2; Children’s Hospital of Oakland Research Institute) and cloned on either side of a central loxP-neoR-loxP cassette in pBluescript derivative pNX. The mutations were introduced into the right homology arm (exon 5) by PCR amplification; the entire insert was then excised by NotI digestion and ligated to a pAAV vector backbone, yielding pAAV-cdk7as. Transfection of HEK293 cells, isolation of rAAV particles, and infection of HCT116 cells were performed as described (Kohli et al., 2004). Additional information, including sequences of primers used in this study, is available upon request. Biochemical and immunological methods Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation, and kinase assays of immune complexes, were carried out as previously described (Wohlbold et al., 2006). To measure Cdk1/cyclin B assembly, we pre-incubated extracts (200 μg total protein) from cells in mitosis or G2 with 2 μM 1-NMPP1 or DMSO, then added 500 ng purified cyclin B1, amino-terminally tagged with hexahistidine and the Myc epitope (gift of D. Morgan, University of California, San Francisco), and an ATP-regenerating system (Larochelle et al., 2006). Where indicated, incubations were supplemented with 400 ng purified Csk1 (Larochelle et al., 2006) or 600 ng wild-type or analog-sensitive, T-loop-phosphorylated Cdk7/cyclin H/Mat1 complex (Larochelle et al., 2001; Larochelle et al., 2006). After 90 min at room temperature, Myc-cyclin B and associated proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibodies and immune complexes were subjected to immunoblotting, with anti-Myc and anti-Cdk1 antibodies, and tested for histone H1 kinase activity. Antibodies used in this study were: anti-Cdk7 (MO1.1), from Sigma; anti-Cdk1 (C19), -Cdk2 (D-12 and M2), -cyclin B1 (GN51 and H-433), -cyclin A (H-432) -cyclin E (HE111 or M20), and -Rpb1 amino-terminus (N20), from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-Rpb1 CTD phospho-Ser5 (polyclonal), from Abcam (used in Figure 1F Chemical genetic methods The labeled analog, [γ-32P]N6-(benzyl)-ATP was generated enzymatically with nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK) as previously described (Kraybill et al., 2002), and labeling by endogenous Cdk7as was performed exactly as described previously for labeling by the recombinant enzyme (Larochelle et al., 2006). The inhibitory analog 1-NMPP1 (Bishop et al., 2000) was dissolved and stored in DMSO and used at final concentrations indicated. Cell synchronization, cell-cycle analysis and viability assays Wild-type or Cdk7as/as HCT116 cells were synchronized by incubation in serum-free medium for 48 h and released into medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. Synchronization with thymidine or nocodazole, and analysis of cell-cycle distribution by flow cytometry, were performed as previously described (Papi et al., 2005). Cell viability was measured by 3,[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as described (van der Kuip et al., 2001). 01 Click here to view.(1.2M, pdf) Acknowledgments We thank D. Morgan (University of California, San Francisco) for cyclin B and NDPK expression vectors, S. Keeney for critical review of the manuscript, and H. Hochegger and S. Takeda (Kyoto University), for communicating their pre-publication results obtained with analog-sensitive Cdk1 in vertebrate cells. This work was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to L.W., and by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants GM56985 to R.P.F., CA107342 to P.V.J. and EB001987 to K.M.S. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997; 13():261-91.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997]J Cell Sci. 2005 Nov 15; 118(Pt 22):5171-80.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]Cell. 1994 Dec 16; 79(6):1103-9.
[Cell. 1994]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun; 15(6):2983-92.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Genetics. 1997 Sep; 147(1):57-71.
[Genetics. 1997]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]Cell Cycle. 2006 Mar; 5(5):546-54.
[Cell Cycle. 2006]Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1; 12(3):370-81.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16; 99(8):5527-32.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]EMBO J. 2001 Jun 1; 20(11):2844-56.
[EMBO J. 2001]Cell Cycle. 2006 Mar; 5(5):546-54.
[Cell Cycle. 2006]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]Cell. 1994 Aug 26; 78(4):713-24.
[Cell. 1994]Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 2; 32(1):e3.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2004]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25; 93(13):6488-93.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25; 93(13):6482-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]EMBO J. 2001 Jul 16; 20(14):3749-59.
[EMBO J. 2001]Nature. 2003 Jul 10; 424(6945):228-32.
[Nature. 2003]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]EMBO J. 1992 Nov; 11(11):3995-4005.
[EMBO J. 1992]Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000; 46(4):293-304.
[Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 11; 278(28):25752-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Genome Biol. 2001; 2(10):RESEARCH0041.
[Genome Biol. 2001]EMBO J. 1992 Nov; 11(11):3995-4005.
[EMBO J. 1992]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jan; 15(1):345-50.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1; 12(3):285-9.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Cell Cycle. 2006 May; 5(10):1123-4.
[Cell Cycle. 2006]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]EMBO J. 1992 Jul; 11(7):2381-90.
[EMBO J. 1992]Science. 1995 Oct 6; 270(5233):90-3.
[Science. 1995]Genes Dev. 1999 Nov 15; 13(22):2946-57.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1; 12(3):370-81.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jan; 15(1):345-50.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1; 12(3):370-81.
[Genes Dev. 1998]EMBO J. 2001 Jul 16; 20(14):3749-59.
[EMBO J. 2001]Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Aug; 3(8):696-700.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1996]EMBO J. 1991 Nov; 10(11):3311-9.
[EMBO J. 1991]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997; 13():261-91.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997]J Cell Biol. 1998 May 18; 141(4):875-85.
[J Cell Biol. 1998]Nature. 2000 Sep 21; 407(6802):395-401.
[Nature. 2000]Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Oct; 7(10):1029-35.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2005]J Cell Sci. 2005 Nov 15; 118(Pt 22):5171-80.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]Cell Cycle. 2005 Apr; 4(4):572-7.
[Cell Cycle. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2001 Apr 6; 276(14):10913-20.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996 Jun; 8(3):312-7.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996]J Cell Sci. 2005 Nov 15; 118(Pt 22):5171-80.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 2; 32(1):e3.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2004]Cell Cycle. 2006 Mar; 5(5):546-54.
[Cell Cycle. 2006]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]EMBO J. 2001 Jul 16; 20(14):3749-59.
[EMBO J. 2001]J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Oct 16; 124(41):12118-28.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2002]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]Nature. 2000 Sep 21; 407(6802):395-401.
[Nature. 2000]Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Oct; 7(10):1029-35.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2005]Blood. 2001 Sep 1; 98(5):1532-41.
[Blood. 2001]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-62.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006]