Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Mar; 66(3): 426–427.
PMCID: PMC1856022

Influence of weight, body mass index and lifestyle factors on radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration

Intervertebral disc degeneration is characterised radiologically by the presence of osteophytes, disc space narrowing and endplate sclerosis. Various lifestyle factors including occupational and recreational physical activity, obesity and smoking have been reported to be associated with the occurrence of lumbar disc disease, although the results from studies are not always consistent, with few studies looking at associations with the component radiographic features of the disease.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 We studied a population‐based sample of men and women to determine the association between weight, body mass index (BMI), regular levels of physical activity, smoking and radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration.

Men and women aged [gt-or-equal, slanted]50 years were recruited for participation in a screening survey of vertebral osteoporosis (European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study) in Aberdeen, UK. The sampling frame was a community health index based on primary‐care registrants. Subjects were invited to attend for an interviewer‐administered questionnaire and lateral spine radiographs. Height and weight were also assessed. Vertebral disc spaces from L1/2 to L4/5 were assessed by a single observer for anterior osteophytes, endplate sclerosis and disc space narrowing (each graded 0–3).10 For each feature, a total score was calculated by summing the grades across vertebral levels (range 0–12). Linear regression was used to determine the association between the total score for each of the radiographic features and the putative risk factors, with the radiographic feature as the dependent variable, results being expressed as β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All individuals gave written informed consent to take part in the study, which also received the approval of the local ethics committee.

A total of 286 men (mean (standard deviation (SD) age 65.3 (8.9) years) and 299 women (mean (SD) age 65.2 (8.9) years) were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) score for osteophytes was 4 (2, 5), endplate sclerosis 1 (0, 2) and disc space narrowing 1 (0, 3). After adjustment for age and sex, compared with those in the lowest tertile, those in the middle and upper tertiles of body weight had a higher total osteophyte score (table 11).). Small positive associations were seen between weight and BMI and the scores for the other radiographic features although CIs around most estimates included unity. There was no association between any of the total scores and regular physical activity levels or smoking.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Influence of weight, BMI, physical activity and smoking on individual radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration

The response rate for participation in the study was 61%. Because the analysis of the influence of weight, BMI and lifestyle factors was based on an internal comparison of responders, non‐participation is unlikely to have had a major effect on the observed results. Intraobserver agreement levels for assessment of the radiographic features were good (κ = 0.7–0.8), and it seems unlikely that random error in scoring the films importantly attenuated the associations. Finally, the results were derived from a predominantly Caucasian population in north‐eastern Scotland, and the data should be extrapolated beyond this population with caution. Previous population‐based studies examining the effect of regular levels of physical activity and smoking provide somewhat conflicting results.5,7,8,9 Our data suggest no important influence of these factors on the occurrence of the individual radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration. By contrast, increased weight was associated with an increased risk of osteophytes.


We thank the Arthritis Research Campaign for support.


Competing interests: None.


1. Biering‐Sorensen F, Hanson F R, Schroll M, Runeborg O. The relation of spinal x‐ray to low back pain and physical activity among 60 year old men and women. Spine 1985. 10445–451.451 [PubMed]
2. van Sasse J L C M, Vandenbroucke J P, Romunde L K J, Valkenburg H A. Osteoarthritis and obesity in the general population. A relationship calling for an explanation. J Rheumatol 1988. 151152–1158.1158 [PubMed]
3. Battie M C, Videman T, Gill K, Moneta G B, Nyman R, Kaprio J. et al Smoking and lumbar inter‐vertebral disc degeneration: an MRI study of identical twins. Spine 1991. 161015–1021.1021 [PubMed]
4. Battie M C, Videman T, Gibbons L E, Fisher L D, Manninen H, Gill K. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine 1995. 202601–2612.2612 [PubMed]
5. Jones G, White C, Sambrook P, Eisman J. Allelic variation in the vitamin D receptor, lifestyle factors and lumbar spinal degenerative disease. Ann Rheum Dis 1998. 5794–99.99 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Videman T, Battie M C. The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine 1999. 241164–1168.1168 [PubMed]
7. O'Neill T W, McCloskey E V, Kanis J A, Bhalla A K, Reeve J, Reid D M. et al The distribution, determinants, and clinical correlates of vertebral osteophytosis: a population based survey. J Rheumatol 1999. 26842–848.848 [PubMed]
8. Yoshimura N, Dennison E, Wilman C, Hashimoto T, Cooper C. Epidemiology of chronic disc degeneration and osteo‐arthritis of the lumbar spine in Britain and Japan: a comparative study. J Rheumatol 2000. 27429–433.433 [PubMed]
9. Hassett G, Hart D J, Manek N J, Doyle D V, Spector T D. Risk factors for progression of lumbar spine disc degeneration. Arthritis Rheum 2003. 483112–3117.3117 [PubMed]
10. Pye S R, Reid D M, Smith R, Adams J E, Nelson K, Silman A J. et al Radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration and self‐reported back pain. J Rheumatol 2004. 31753–758.758 [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...