- We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

# RNA Helix Stability in Mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} Solution

## Abstract

A recently developed tightly bound ion model can account for the correlation and fluctuation (i.e., different binding modes) of bound ions. However, the model cannot treat mixed ion solutions, which are physiologically relevant and biologically significant, and the model was based on B-DNA helices and thus cannot directly treat RNA helices. In the present study, we investigate the effects of ion correlation and fluctuation on the thermodynamic stability of finite length RNA helices immersed in a mixed solution of monovalent and divalent ions. Experimental comparisons demonstrate that the model gives improved predictions over the Poisson-Boltzmann theory, which has been found to underestimate the roles of multivalent ions such as Mg^{2+} in stabilizing DNA and RNA helices. The tightly bound ion model makes quantitative predictions on how the Na^{+}-Mg^{2+} competition determines helix stability and its helix length-dependence. In addition, the model gives empirical formulas for the thermodynamic parameters as functions of Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} concentrations and helix length. Such formulas can be quite useful for practical applications.

## INTRODUCTION

Nucleic acids, namely DNAs and RNAs, are negatively charged chain molecules. Ions in the solution can screen (neutralize) the Coulombic repulsion on nucleotide backbone and thus play an essential role in stabilizing compact three-dimensional structures of nucleic acids (1–18). Helices are the most widespread structural motifs in nucleic acid structures. Quantitative understanding of how the ions stabilize helices is a crucial step toward understanding nucleic acid folding.

Current experimental measurements for helix thermodynamic stability mainly focus on the standard salt condition 1 M Na^{+} (19–27). These parameters form the basis for quantitative studies of nucleic acid helices under this specific ionic condition (19–32). However, cellular physiological condition requires a mixed monovalent/multivalent solution (150 mM Na^{+}, 5 mM Mg^{2+}, and other ions such as K^{+}). These different ions in the solution can compete with each other, resulting in complex interactions with the nucleic acid helix. Therefore, it is highly desirable to have a theory that can make quantitative predictions beyond single-species ion solutions. However, our quantitative understanding on nucleic acid stability in mixed ion solution is quite limited both experimentally and theoretically (33–47).

Experimental and theoretical works have been performed to investigate the general ion-dependence of nucleic acid helix stability (33–47). These studies have led to several useful empirical relationships between ion concentration and nucleic acid helix stability (24,31,44–47). These empirical relationships mainly focus on the monovalent ions (Na^{+} or K^{+}) (24,31,44–47). However, the mixed multivalent/monovalent ions interact with nucleic acid helices in a much more complex way than single-species monovalent ions. One reason is due to the strong ion-ion correlation between multivalent ions. Extensive experiments suggest that Mg^{2+} ions are much more efficient than Na^{+} in stabilizing both DNA and RNA helices (48–59). Because of the limited experimental data and the inability to rigorously treat ion correlation and fluctuation effects, there is a notable lack in quantitative predictions for helix stability in multivalent/monovalent mixed salt solution (31).

A problem with the multivalent ions is the correlation between the ions, especially between ions in the close vicinity of RNA surface, and the related fluctuation over a vast number of possible ion-binding modes. There have been two major types of polyelectrolyte theories for studying the nucleic acid helix stability: the counterion condensation (CC) theory (60–62) and the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) theory (63–70). Both theories have been quite successful in predicting thermodynamics of nucleic acids and proteins in ion solutions (60–70). The CC theory is based on the assumption of two-state ion distribution and is a double-limit law, i.e., it is developed for dilute salt solution and for nucleic acids of infinite length (71–73). The PB theory is a mean-field theory that ignores ion-ion correlations, which can be important for multivalent ions (e.g., Mg^{2+}).

Recently, a tightly bound ion (TBI) model was developed (74–77). The essence of the model is to take into account the correlation and fluctuation effects for bound ions (74–77). Experimental comparisons showed that the inclusion of correlation and fluctuation effects in the TBI model can lead to improved predictions for the thermodynamic stability of DNA helix and DNA helix-helix assembly (75–77). However, the applicability of the TBI model is hampered by two limitations: 1), the model can only treat single-species ion solutions and cannot treat mixed ion solutions, which are biologically and physiologically significant; and 2), the model does not treat RNA helices. In this article, we go beyond the previous TBI studies by calculating the stability of finite-length RNA (and DNA) helices immersed in a mixed salt solution. Despite its biological significance, for a long time, quantitative and analytical predictions for RNA helix stability in mixed ionic solvent have been unavailable (31,57–59,75). The results presented in this study are a step toward bridging the gap.

## METHODS

### Thermodynamics for nucleic acid helix stability

We model RNA (DNA) duplex as a double-stranded (ds) helix and the coil as a single-stranded (ss) helix (75). The structures of dsRNA (dsDNA) and ssRNA (ssDNA) are modeled from the grooved primitive model (74–78); see Fig. 1 and Appendices A and B for the structures of ds and ss RNAs (DNAs). We quantify the helix stability by the free energy difference Δ*G*°_{T} between helix and coil as

where *G*°_{T} (ds) and *G*°_{T} (ss) are the free energies for the dsRNA (DNA) and the ssRNA (DNA), respectively. The stability Δ*G*°_{T} depends on RNA (DNA) sequences, temperature *T*, the solvent ionic condition. To calculate the ion dependence of helix stability, we decompose Δ*G*°_{T} into two parts: the electrostatic contribution and the nonelectrostatic (chemical) contribution (75,79–82),

where is calculated from the polyelectrolyte theory and is calculated from the empirical parameters for basepairing and stacking (19–26). As an approximation, we assume that the salt (ion)-independence of is weak, thus for different salt conditions can be calculated from the following equation by using the nearest-neighbor model (19–26) in the standard 1 M NaCl condition:

(1 M NaCl) in the above equation can be calculated from a polyelectrolyte theory, and Δ*G*°_{T} (1 M NaCl) is obtained from experimental measurement or calculated through the nearest-neighbor model (19–26),

Here the summation (Σ) is over all the base stacks in RNA (DNA) helix. Δ*H*°_{bs}(1 M Na^{+}) and Δ*S*°_{bs}(1 M Na^{+}) are the changes of enthalpy and entropy for the formation of base stacks at 1M NaCl, respectively. Here, as an approximation, we ignore the heat capacity difference Δ*C*_{p} between helix and coil (75,83–90), and treat Δ*H*°(1 M Na^{+}) and Δ*S*°(1 M Na^{+}) as temperature-independent parameters (19–26). Such approximation has been shown to be valid when the temperature is not far way from 37°C (86–90).

*A*,

*B*) The tightly bound regions around a 14-bp dsRNA (

*left*) and a 14-nt ssRNA (

*right*) in 10mM MgCl

_{2}(

*A*) and in a mixed 10 mM MgCl

_{2}/50 mM NaCl (

*B*) solutions. (

*C*,

*D*) The tightly bound regions around a 14-bp dsDNA (

*left*) and a 14-nt ssDNA (

*right*

**...**

With the use of determined from Eq. 3 and calculated from a polyelectrolyte theory, we obtain the helix stability Δ*G*°_{T} for any given NaCl/MgCl_{2} concentrations and temperature *T* (75) of

where NaCl/MgCl_{2} denotes a mixed NaCl and MgCl_{2} solution. From Δ*G*°_{T} in Eq. 5, we obtain the melting temperature *T*_{m} for the helix-coil transition for a given strand concentration *C*_{S} (24,27,31,90),

Here *R* is the gas constant (= 1.987 cal/K/mol) and *S* is 1 or 4 for self-complementary or non-self-complementary sequences, respectively.

The computation of the electrostatic free energy is critical to the calculation of the folding stability (total free energy Δ*G*°_{T}). In this work, we go beyond the previously TBI model, which was originally developed for a single-species ionic solution, by computing in a solution with mixed salts.

### Tightly bound ion model for mixed ion solutions

Previous TBI theories focused on the stability of DNA helix in pure salt solutions, consisting of a single species of counterion and co-ion. In the present study, we extend the TBI model to treat RNA and DNA helices in mixed monovalent (1:1) and *z*-valent (*z*:1) salt solutions. The key idea here is to treat the monovalent ions as diffusive ionic background using the mean field PB theory and to treat the multivalent ions using the TBI model, which accounts for the ion-ion correlations.

For the multivalent ions, the inter-ion correlation can be strong. According to the strength of inter-ion correlations, we classify the *z*-valent ions into two types (74–77): the (strongly correlated) tightly bound ions and the (weakly correlated) diffusively bound ions. Correspondingly, the space for *z*-valent ions around the nucleic acid can be divided into tightly bound region and diffusive region, respectively. The motivation to distinguish these two types of *z*-valent ions (and the two types of spatial regions for *z*-valent ions) is to treat them differently: for the diffusive *z*-valent ions, we use PB; for the tightly bound *z*-valent ions, we must use a separate treatment that can account for the strong ion-ion correlations and ion-binding fluctuations.

For the *z*-valent ions, we divide the entire tightly bound region into 2*N* cells for an *N*-bp dsRNA (or DNA) helix, each around a phosphate. In a cell *i*, there can be *m*_{i} = 0, 1, 2.. tightly bound *z*-valent ions (74–77). The distribution of the number of the tightly bound ions in the 2*N* cells, {*m*_{1}, *m*_{2}, … , *m*_{2N}}, defines a binding mode, and a large number of such binding modes exists. The total partition function *Z* is given by the summation over all the possible binding modes *M* for *z*-valent ions,

where *Z*_{M} is the partition function for a given binding mode *M*.

To obtain the total partition function, we need to compute *Z*_{M}. For a mode of *N*_{b} tightly bound *z*-valent ions and *N*_{d}(= *N*_{z} − *N*_{b} + *N*_{+} + *N*_{–}) diffusively bound ions, we use **R**_{i} (*i* = 1, 2, … , *N*_{b}) and **r**_{j} (*j* = 1, 2, … , *N*_{d}) to denote the coordinates of the *i*^{th} tightly bound ion and the *j*^{th} diffusive ion, respectively. Here *N*_{z}, *N*_{+}, and *N*_{–} are the numbers of *z*-valent ions, monovalent ions, and co-ions. The total interaction energy *U*(**R**, **r**) of the system for a given ion configuration can be decomposed into three parts: the interaction energy *U*_{b}(**R**) between the fixed charges (the tightly bound *z*-valent ions and the phosphate charges), the interaction energy *U*_{s}(**R, r**) between the diffusive ions, and the interaction energy *U*_{int}(**R, r**) between the diffusive ions and the fixed charges. Then, we can compute *Z*_{M} from the following configurational integral (74,75):

In the above integral, for a given mode, **R**_{i} can distribute within the volume of the respective tightly bound cell while **r**_{j} can distribute in the volume of the bulk solution. *V*_{R} denotes the tightly bound region for *z*-valent ions, and the integration for **R**_{i} of the *i*^{th} tightly bound *z*-valent ion is over the respective tightly bound cell. *V*_{r} denotes the region for the diffusive ions, and the integration for **r**_{j} of the *j*^{th} diffusive ion is over the entire volume of the region for diffusive ions. Averaging over all possible ion distributions gives the free energies Δ*G*_{b} and Δ*G*_{d} for the tightly bound and the diffusive ions, respectively (74–77),

In the TBI model, we assume the dependence of Δ*G*_{d} on the tightly bound ions is mainly through the net tightly bound charge, which is dependent only on *N*_{b} (74–77). Thus, we obtain the following simplified configurational integral for *Z*_{M} (74–77),

where *Z*^{(id)} is the partition function for the uniform ionic solution without the polyanionic helix. The volume integral provides a measure for the accessible space for the *N*_{b} tightly bound *z*-valent ions. Δ*G*_{b} in Eq. 10 is the Coulombic interaction energy between all the charge-charge pairs (including the phosphate groups and the tightly bound ions) in the tightly bound region; and Δ*G*_{d} in Eq. 10 is the free energy for the electrostatic interactions between the diffusive ions and between the diffusive ions and the charges in the tightly bound region, and the entropic free energy of the diffusive ions (74–77). The formulas for calculating the free energies Δ*G*_{b} and Δ*G*_{d} are presented in detail in the literature (74–77) and in Appendix C.

The electrostatic free energies for a dsRNA (dsDNA) or an ssRNA (ssDNA) can be computed as

From Eq. 3 for the nonelectrostatic part () and Eq. 11 for the electrostatic part ( we can compute the total folding stability Δ*G*°_{T} for a nucleic acid helix for a given ionic condition and temperature.

The computational process of the TBI model can be summarized briefly into the following steps (74–77):

- Second, we compute the pairwise potentials of mean force. The calculated potentials of mean force are tabulated and stored for the calculation of Δ
*G*_{b}. - Third, we enumerate the possible binding modes.

For each mode, we calculate Δ*G*_{b} and Δ*G*_{d} (see (74–77) and Appendix C), and compute *Z*_{M} from Eq. 10. Summation over all the binding modes gives the total partition function *Z* (Eq. 7), from which we can calculate the electrostatic free energy for helices.

Before presenting the detailed results, we first clarify the terminology to be used in the discussions:

- First, we use the term ion-binding to denote the ion-RNA interactions (in excess of the ion-ion interactions in the bulk solvent without the presence of RNA). Therefore, the distribution of the bound ions can be evaluated as the actual ion concentration (with the presence of RNA) minus the bulk ion concentration (91–93).
- Second, in the TBI model, we call the strongly correlated bound ions the tightly-bound ions only because these ions are usually distributed within a thin layer surrounding the RNA surface. This term bears no relationship with the ions that are tightly held to certain specific sites of RNA through specific interactions.
- Third, in the TBI theory, the actual distribution of the ions in the solution is not determined by one or two binding modes alone. Instead, it is determined by the ensemble average over all the possible modes. The different modes represent the different possible configurations of the bound ions.

## RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

We investigate the folding thermodynamics of the nucleic acid duplexes for a series of RNA and DNA sequences of different lengths. In Tables 1 and and2,2, we list the RNA and DNA sequences used in the calculations, respectively, as well as the thermodynamic parameters (Δ*H*°, Δ*S*°, Δ*G*°_{37}) for 1 M NaCl calculated from the nearest-neighbor model. We choose these sequences because the experimental data for the helix stability is available for theory-experiment comparison. A primary interest in this study is to investigate the folding stability of RNA helices. However, to make use of the available experimental data for DNA helices to test the theory and to go beyond the previous DNA helix stability studies by extending to the mixed salt solution, we will also investigate DNA helix stability in mixed salt solution.

In the following section, we first investigate the properties of Mg^{2+} binding to RNA and DNA duplexes in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions. We then investigate the stability of RNA helices in NaCl, MgCl_{2}, and mixed NaCl/MgCl_{2} salt solutions. Finally, we study the thermal stability of finite-length DNA helices in mixed NaCl/MgCl_{2} solutions. The mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} condition under investigation covers a broad range of ion concentrations: [Mg^{2+}] [0.1 mM, 0.3 M] and [Na^{+}] [0 M, 1 M]. We mainly focus on the theory-experiment comparisons for two thermodynamic quantities: folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} and melting temperature *T*_{m}. In addition, based on the results from the extended TBI model described above, we derive empirical expressions for the thermodynamic parameters for RNA and DNA duplexes as functions of [Na^{+}] and [Mg^{2+}] and helix length.

### Mg^{2+} binding to finite-length RNA and DNA helices in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions

We have developed a grooved primitive structural model for A-form RNA helix. The model is based on the atomic coordinates of phosphate charges and contains the key structural details such as the major and minor grooves of the helix; see Appendix A for a detailed description of the model. For DNA helix, we use the previously developed structural model; see Appendix B. Based on these structural models, we investigate the ion binding properties and their effects on the thermodynamics of RNA and DNA helices.

Following the previous works (92,93), we use the extended TBI model developed here to calculate the binding of Mg^{2+} to RNA and DNA duplexes in the presence of Na^{+} ions. In the TBI model, the number of the so-called bound ions includes both the tightly bound Mg^{2+} ions and the diffusively bound ions (in the excess of bulk concentrations). We calculate the number of such bound ions per nucleotide, from the equation (74,92,94)

where is the mean fraction of the tightly bound Mg^{2+} ions per nucleotide, which is given by the average over all the possible binding modes *M* of the tightly bound ions: In Eq. 12, *N*_{b} is the number of the tightly bound ions for mode *M*, *Z*_{M} is the partition function of the system in mode *M*, *Z* is the total partition function given by Eq. 7, and *N* is the number of the phosphates on each strand. The second term in Eq. 12 is the contribution from the diffusively bound Mg^{2+}, where and are the Mg^{2+} concentrations at **r** and the bulk concentration, respectively, and 2*N* is the total number of the nucleotides in the duplex.

Fig. 2, *A*–*D*, show the results for RNA and DNA duplexes in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions. The TBI predictions are close to the experimental data (95,96) for both RNA and DNA duplexes, while the PB underestimates This is in accordance with the previous Monte Carlo analysis (91), which shows that PB underestimates the ion concentration near the nucleic acid surface, especially for multivalent ions. Such underestimation can be offset by the use of a smaller ion radius (= width of the charge exclusion layer) in the PB calculations. As shown in Fig. 2, *A* and *B*, a smaller Mg^{2+} ion radius can cause notable changes in the PB results for

As shown in Fig. 2, *C* and *D*, the TBI-predicted results for 24-bp and 15-bp helices are smaller than the experimental data, which are for long helices. The theory-experiment difference may be attributed to the finite length effect (74,97,98), because our results for longer helices give better agreements with the experiments (see Fig. 2, *C* and *D*). In fact, one of the limitations of the current TBI model is its inability to treat very long helices (30 bps). Fig. 2 *E* shows the distributions of the tightly bound ions along the dsRNA helix. From Fig. 2 *E*, we find that the finite-length effect is weaker for higher [Mg^{2+}]. This is because higher [Mg^{2+}] leads to a larger fraction of charge neutralization for RNA and thus weaker finite length effect.

The curves for a similar system have been calculated previously using PB (92,93), where the RNA and DNA duplexes are represented by infinite-length charged cylinders with the negative charges distributed on the axes with equal spacing (92,93). In contrast, the present TBI theory is based on more realistic grooved structures for RNA and DNA helices. However, the present TBI model can only treat helices of (short) finite length. Moreover, the present TBI theory and the PB (92,93) may use quite different ion radii (we use in this TBI study).

### Salt dependence of folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} for RNA helices

Based on the structural models for dsRNA helix and ssRNA (see Appendix A), using Eq. 5, we calculate the folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} for RNA duplex formation for the RNA sequences listed in Table 1.

#### In Na^{+} solutions

The folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} for RNA helices, predicted by the TBI model, is plotted as a function of Na^{+} concentration in Fig. 3. Also plotted in Fig. 3 is the experimental data for the sequences with different lengths: CCAUGG (57), CCAUAUGG (57), GCCAGUUAA (53), AUUGGAUACAAA (53), and CCUUGAUAUCAAGG (57). Fig. 3 shows that, as we expected, higher [Na^{+}] causes higher RNA helix stability, and the Na^{+}-dependence is stronger for longer sequences. This is because higher [Na^{+}] causes a smaller translation entropy decrease (and thus lower free energy) for the bound ions. As a result, the fraction of charge neutralization of RNA is larger for higher [Na^{+}]. Such Na^{+}-dependence is more pronounced for dsRNA (of higher charge density) than for ssRNA (of lower charge density), and consequently results in helix stabilization by higher [Na^{+}]. Moreover, longer helices involve stronger Coulombic interactions and thus have stronger Na^{+}-dependence than shorter helices. Fig. 3 shows good agreements between the TBI predictions and the available experimental data for RNA helices.

#### In Mg^{2+} solutions

The folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} predicted by the TBI model is plotted as function of [Mg^{2+}] in Fig. 4 (*curves* with [Na^{+}] = 0). Similar to the Na^{+}-dependence of the helix stability, higher [Mg^{2+}] causes larger neutralized fraction of RNA, resulting in a higher helix stability (i.e., lower folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37}). As [Mg^{2+}] exceeds a high concentration (>0.03M), the decrease of Δ*G*°_{37} with increased [Mg^{2+}] becomes saturated. This is because for high [Mg^{2+}], when the RNA helix becomes fully neutralized, further addition of Mg^{2+} will not increase the fraction of charge neutralization for RNA. Therefore, the decrease in Δ*G*°_{37} and the stabilization of the helix caused by further addition of ions are saturated.

*G*°

_{37}of RNA helix as functions of MgCl

_{2}concentration for mixed NaCl/MgCl

_{2}solutions with different NaCl concentrations and for different sequences. (

*A*) CCAUGG: [NaCl] = 0 M, 0.018 M, 0.1 M, and 1 M (from

**...**

Fig. 4 shows that, as compared to the TBI theory, the PB theory can underestimate the RNA helix stability due to the neglected correlated low-energy states of the (bound) Mg^{2+} ions (75). Such deficiency in helix stability is more pronounced for longer helices, where electrostatic interactions and correlation effects become more significant.

#### In mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions

In Fig. 4, we show the folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} for three RNA helices in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions: CCAUGG (57), CCAUAUGG (57), and CCUUGAUAUCAAGG (57). The comparison shows improved predictions from the TBI than the PB as tested against the available experimental data.

For mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solution, in addition to the general trend of increased stability for higher [Na^{+}] and [Mg^{2+}], the interplay between monovalent and divalent ions leads to the following behavior of the helix folding stability:

- For high [Mg
^{2+}], helix stability is dominated by Mg^{2+}and is hence not sensitive to [Na^{+}]. - As [Mg
^{2+}] is decreased so that [Mg^{2+}] becomes comparable with [Na^{+}], Na^{+}ions, which are less efficient in stabilizing the helix, begin to play a role and compete with Mg^{2+}, causing the helix to become less stable as manifested by the increase in Δ*G*°_{37}as [Mg^{2+}] is decreased. - As [Mg
^{2+}] is further decreased, helix stability would be dominated by Na^{+}ions and becomes insensitive to [Mg^{2+}].

Also shown in Fig. 4 are the predictions from the PB theory. For low-[Mg^{2+}] solution, the electrostatic interactions are dominated by the Na^{+} ions, whose correlation effect is negligible. As a result, PB and TBI model give nearly identical results. For high-[Mg^{2+}] solution, however, the mean-field PB theory underestimates helix stability because it cannot account for the low-energy correlated states of Mg^{2+} ions (75–77). For the PB calculations, to partially make up the stability caused by the ignored low-energy states for the correlated Mg^{2+} ions, one can use a smaller Mg^{2+} ion radius, corresponding to a smaller thickness of the exclusion layer on the molecular surface. As shown in Fig. 4, we find that the PB theory can give improved fit to the experimental data if we assume that the Mg^{2+} ion radius is as small as the Na^{+} ion radius. This does not imply the validity of PB for the Mg^{2+}-induced stabilization because such fitted Mg^{2+} ion radius is the same as the Na^{+} radius (99). Even with the small Mg^{2+} ion radius (equal to Na^{+} radius), the agreement with the experiment data is not as satisfactory as the TBI theory, which uses a larger (than Na^{+}) Mg^{2+} ion radius (99). In fact, the correlation effect neglected in the PB theory can be crucial for multivalent ion-mediated force in nucleic acid structures such as the packing of helices (76,77). It is important to note that the ion radius used here is an effective hydrated or partially dehydrated radius. Such a radius would vary with the change of the ion hydration state and could be different for different measurements.

An intriguing observation from Fig. 4, *A*–*C*, is the length-dependence of helix stability. As helix length is increased, the TBI model-predicted curves for the [Mg^{2+}]-dependence of helix stability for different [Na^{+}] begin to cross over each other; i.e., for a certain range of [Mg^{2+}], adding Na^{+} ions can slightly destabilize the helix. Such (slight) Na^{+}-induced destabilization has also been observed in experiments (53). We note that such phenomena is absent in the Poisson-Boltzmann theory-predicted curves. Physically, the Na^{+}-induced destabilization is due to the Na^{+}-Mg^{2+} competition for longer helices, as explained below. Mg^{2+} ions are (much) more efficient in charge neutralization than Na^{+} ions, and the higher efficiency of Mg^{2+} over Na^{+} is more pronounced for longer helices, which involves stronger electrostatic interactions. For a given [Mg^{2+}], an increase in [Na^{+}] would enhance the probability for the binding of Na^{+} ions (100). The enhanced Na^{+} binding would reduce the binding affinity of Mg^{2+}. Such effect is more significant for longer helices, causing the helix to be slightly destabilized by the addition of Na^{+} for long helices.

### Salt concentration-dependence of melting temperature *T*_{m} for RNA helices

From Eq. 6, the melting temperature *T*_{m} for RNA helix-to-coil transition can be calculated for different ionic conditions: pure Na^{+}, pure Mg^{2+}, and mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+}.

#### In Na^{+} solutions

In Fig. 5, *T*_{m}-values of RNA helices are plotted as a function of [Na^{+}] for different sequences: CCAUGG (57), AUUGGAUACAAA (53), AAAAAAAUUUUUUU (35), CCUUGAUAUCAAGG (57), and ACCGACCA/AGGCUGGA with dangling adenines (59). Fig. 5 shows the good agreement between the TBI model and the available experimental data. In accordance with the predicted higher helix stability (lower Δ*G*°_{37}) for higher [Na^{+}] (Fig. 3), the *T*_{m} of RNA helices increases with [Na^{+}].

*T*

_{m}of RNA helix as a function of NaCl concentration for different sequences of various lengths: CCUUGAUAUCAAGG of strand concentration

*C*

_{S}= 10

^{−4}M, ACCGACCA/AGGCUGGA of

*C*

_{S}= 9

*μ*M, AUUGGAUACAAA of

**...**

For comparison, in Figs. 3 and and5,5, we also show the results for DNA helix stability. The results for DNA helix are obtained from two different methods: SantaLucia's empirical formula (24) and the empirical formula derived from the TBI model (75). From Figs. 3 and and5,5, we find that for short helices, DNA and RNA helices have similar stabilities Δ*G*°_{37} for a given Na^{+} ion concentration in the range [0.1 M, 1 M]. Thus, the use of SantaLucia's empirical formula can still give reasonable estimations for RNA helix stabilities at high Na^{+} concentration (101,102). For [Na^{+}] below ~0.1 M Na^{+}, SantaLucia's empirical formula overestimates the stabilities of RNA (and DNA) helices (75). From the experimental comparisons shown in Figs. 3 and and5,5, we find that the formula derived from the TBI model for DNA (75) can give good fit for Na^{+}-dependence of Δ*G*°_{37} of RNA helix even for lower Na^{+} concentrations. For very low Na^{+} concentrations, the empirical relation for DNA slightly (75) overestimates the RNA stability. Therefore, compared to DNA helix, RNA helix stability has (slightly) stronger Na^{+}-dependence. The (slightly) stronger Na^{+}-dependence of Δ*G*°_{37} for RNA helix is because the A-form RNA helix has (slightly) higher negative charge density (103–105) than the B-form DNA helix (see Appendices A and B).

#### In mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions

For mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions, Fig. 6 shows the *T*_{m}-values of RNA helices for different sequences: CCAUGG (57), CCAUAUGG (57), and CCUUGAUAUCAAGG (57). In the high [Mg^{2+}] and high [Na^{+}] case, the electrostatic effect of helix stability is dominated by the Mg^{2+} and Na^{+} ions, respectively. In the regime of strong Na^{+}-Mg^{2+} competition, the high concentration of Na^{+} ions would weaken the helix stability for a fixed [Mg^{2+}]. Such effect would result in a lower *T*_{m}, and the Na^{+}-induced helix destabilization is more pronounced for longer helices (75).

### Thermodynamic parameters of RNA helix as functions of Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} concentrations

With the TBI model, we can obtain RNA helix stability for any given Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} concentrations. However, for practical applications, it would be useful to derive empirical formulas for RNA helix stability as functions of Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} concentrations. In this section, based on the TBI model predictions for the RNA helix stability for sequences listed in Table 1, we derive empirical expressions for RNA helix stability at different ionic conditions. Since the general formula in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solution can be most conveniently derived from the results for pure Na^{+} or Mg^{2+} solution, we first derive formulas for pure Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} solutions. As we show below, the results for single species solution are the special limiting cases for more general results for mixed ions.

#### In Na^{+} solutions

Based on the predictions of the TBI model, we obtain the following fitted functions for the [Na^{+}]-dependent Δ*G*°_{37}, Δ*S*°, and *T*_{m} for RNA helix,

where is the mean electrostatic free energy per base stack. is a function of [Na^{+}] and helix length *N*:

For a broad range of the Na^{+} concentration from 3 mM to 1 M, the above formulas give good fit with the TBI predictions for the folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} (see Fig. 7 *A*) and good agreements with the experimental data for the melting temperature *T*_{m} (Fig. 8).

*G*°

_{37}of RNA helix as functions of NaCl (

*A*) and MgCl

_{2}(

*B*) concentrations for different sequences of various lengths. (

*A*) CCAUGG, CCAUAUGG, GCCAGUUAA, AUUGGAUACAAA, and CCUUGAUAUCAAGG (from

*top*to

*bottom*). (

*B*) CCAUGG,

**...**

#### In Mg^{2+} solutions

Based on the free energy Δ*G*°_{37} calculated by the TBI model for pure Mg^{2+}, we obtain the following expressions for [Mg^{2+}]-dependent Δ*G*°_{37}, Δ*S*°, and *T*_{m} for RNA helix:

Here is the electrostatic folding free energy per base stack, and is given by the following function of helix length *N* and the Mg^{2+} concentration:

As shown in Fig. 7 *B*, the above formulas give good fit to the TBI-predicted Δ*G*°_{37}.

#### In mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions

For a mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solution, from the TBI-predicted results, we have the following empirical formulas for RNA helix stability and melting temperature,

where *x*_{1} and *x*_{2} stand for the fractional contributions of Na^{+} ions and Mg^{2+} to the whole stability, respectively, and are given by

Here (*x*_{1}, *x*_{2}) = (1, 0) for a pure Na^{+} solution and (0, 1) for a pure Mg^{2+} solution. The values and are given by Eqs. 16 and 20 for pure Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} solutions, respectively. The value Δ*g*_{12} is a crossing term for Na^{+}-Mg^{2+} interference and is given by

In a pure ionic solution, Δ*g*_{12} = 0 and the formulas for mixed ion solution return to the results for the corresponding pure ionic solutions. The parameters at 1 M can be either calculated from the nearest-neighbor model (19–26) or obtained directly from experiments. Fig. 9 shows that the above expression for *T*_{m} (Eq. 23) gives good predictions for RNA helices as tested against the available experimental data (57) and the predictions from the PB theory.

#### Na^{+} versus Mg^{2+} for RNA helix stability

Experiments show that a mixture of 10 mM Mg^{2+} and 150 mM Na^{+} is equivalent to 1 M Na^{+} in stabilizing a 6-bp DNA duplex (49), and a mixture of 10 mM Mg^{2+} and 50 mM Na^{+} is similar to 1 M Na^{+} in stabilizing a ribosomal RNA secondary structure (56). We have previously shown that 10 mM Mg^{2+} is slightly less efficient than 1 M Na^{+} for stabilizing a 9-bp DNA duplex with averaged sequence parameters (75).

Using the empirical expressions derived above, we can quantitatively compare RNA helix abilities in Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} solutions. To obtain a crude estimation, we use the mean enthalpy and entropy parameters averaged over different base stacks in 1 M NaCl: ( ) = (−10.76 kcal/mol, −27.85 cal/mol/K) (26). Then Δ*H* = −10.76(*N* − 1) kcal/mol for an *N*-bp RNA helix. According to Eq. 23, for a 9-bp RNA duplex, the difference of the melting temperature Δ*T*_{m} = *T*_{m}(1 M Na^{+}) − *T*_{m}(10 mM Mg^{2+}) is ~−0.2°C. Therefore, 10 mM Mg^{2+} and 1 M Na^{+} solutions support approximately the same stability for a 9-bp RNA helix. The addition of Na^{+} in 10 mM Mg^{2+} would slightly destabilize the RNA duplex. For example, *T*_{m} would be lowered by 1.4°C for a 9-bp RNA helix if 50 mM Na^{+} is added to a 10 mM Mg^{2+} solution. As discussed above, this is because the added Na^{+} ions would counteract the efficient role of Mg^{2+}.

### DNA helix stability in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions

Although the [Na^{+}]-dependence of DNA helix stability has been well studied based on the PB theory and the TBI model (44,75), quantitative understanding of DNA stability Δ*G*°_{37} in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solvent is relatively limited. Fig. 10 shows Δ*G*°_{37} versus [Mg^{2+}] for different [Na^{+}] values in a mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solution for the three sequences GCATGC (49), GCCAGTTAA (53), and AGAAAGAGAAGA (55). The comparison between the TBI predictions and the available experimental data shows good agreements. From Figs. 4 and and10,10, we find that the stabilities of RNA and DNA helices have the same qualitative salt-dependence in a mixed salt solution.

*G*°

_{37}of DNA helix as functions of MgCl

_{2}concentration for mixed NaCl/MgCl

_{2}solutions with different NaCl concentrations and for different DNA sequences. (

*A*) GCATGC: [NaCl] = 0 M, 0.012 M, 0.15 M, and 1

**...**

From the temperature-dependence of the folding free energy Δ*G*°_{T} from Eq. 5, we obtain the melting temperature *T*_{m} in Eq. 6. In Fig. 11, we show the *T*_{m}-values for different sequences: GCATGC (49), GCCAGTTAA (53), and AGAAAGAGAAGA (55), as predicted from the experiments, the TBI model, and the PB theory. Fig. 11 shows the TBI predictions agree well with the experimental data, and the TBI model gives improved predictions over the PB theory. In a mixed salt solution with low NaCl concentration, the experimental *T*_{m}-values are slightly higher than those predicted by the TBI model, because the experimental buffers contain additional Na^{+} ions (from, e.g., sodium cacodylate) (49,53,55). The mean-field PB theory underestimates the role of Mg^{2+} ions in stabilizing DNA helix, especially for long helix, because PB ignores the correlated low-energy states (74–77). As shown in Figs. 10 and and11,11, PB could give better predictions if we decrease the Mg^{2+} ion radius.

*T*

_{m}of DNA helix as a function of MgCl

_{2}concentration in mixed NaCl/MgCl

_{2}solutions with different NaCl concentrations for different sequences. (

*A*) GCATGC of

*C*

_{S}= 10

^{−4}M: [NaCl] = 0 M, 0.012 M, 0.15 M, and

**...**

As we predicted from the folding free energy, the addition of Na^{+} ions can destabilize the helix, which causes a lower *T*_{m}, and then the Na^{+}-induced destabilization effect is stronger for long helices. For high Na^{+} concentration, Na^{+} ions can effectively push Mg^{2+} away from the helix surface and Na^{+} ions would dominate the helix stability. Consequently, *T*_{m} becomes close to the value of the *T*_{m} in pure Na^{+} solutions.

### Thermodynamic parameters for DNA helix in Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} mixed solution

For pure Na^{+} or Mg^{2+} solutions, previous studies have given several useful empirical expressions for thermodynamic parameters as functions of [Na^{+}] or [Mg^{2+}] and helix length (24,31,75). These expressions are practically quite useful for a broad range of biological applications such as the design of the ionic conditions for PCR and DNA hybridization (31,106). In this section, using the TBI model, we present a more general expression for the salt-dependent thermodynamic parameters, namely, the thermodynamic parameters in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} salt condition. For mixed salt case, the computational modeling is particularly valuable because of the lacking of experimental data, especially for the folding free energy Δ*G*°_{T} in the mixed salt. The calculated parameters are reliable because of agreements with available experimental results.

Using the results for the folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} predicted from the TBI model for sequences with lengths of 6–15 bp (listed in Table 2), we obtain the following empirical expression for Δ*G*°_{37}, Δ*S*°, and *T*_{m},

where *x*_{1} and *x*_{2}, given by Eq. 24, are the fractional contributions of Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} respectively, and and are the mean electrostatic folding free energy per base stacks for DNA helix in a pure Na^{+} or Mg^{2+} solution, and are given by Tan and Chen (75):

and

Here, Δ*g*_{12} is the crossing term for the effects of Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} and is given by Eq. 25. In Eq. 26, Δ*G*°_{37}(1 M) is the folding free energy at 1 M NaCl, and *N* − 1 and *N* are the numbers of base stacks and basepairs in the DNA helix, respectively. Fig. 12 shows that the above expressions agree well with the available experimental data for DNA helix in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions (49,53,55).

### Effects of the ssRNA structure

In the above calculations, we use a mean single-strand helix to represent the ensemble of ssRNA conformations. In this section, we investigate the sensitivity of our predictions of the helix stability to the structural parameters of ssRNA. For simplicity, we use an 8-bp RNA helix in pure Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} solutions as examples for illustration. As described in Appendix A, there are three major structural parameters for an ssRNA helix: *r*_{p}, the radial coordinate of phosphates, Δ*z*, the rise per nucleotide along axis, and Δ*θ*, twist angle per residue. In the above calculations, the parameters used for ssRNA are (*r*_{p}, Δ*z*, Δ*θ*) = (7 Å, 1.9 Å, 32.7°), where two adjacent nucleotides are separated by a distance of *d*_{p–p} 4.4 Å. To study the effects of ssRNA structural parameters on the predicted helix stability, we test the following two cases: 1), we fix (*r*_{p}, Δ*θ*) = (7 Å, 32.7°) and change only the value of Δ*z*; 2), we fix *d*_{p–p} 4.4 Å and Δ*θ* = 32.7°, and change *r*_{p} and Δ*z* concomitantly while keeping *d*_{p–p} fixed.

First, we perform calculations for two values of Δ*z*: 1.4 Å and 2.4 Å, corresponding to Δ*z* smaller and larger than 1.9 Å (= the ssRNA helix parameter used in our calculations for RNA helix stability), respectively. As shown in Fig. 13, *A* and *B*, a larger Δ*z* of ssRNA causes two effects: It lowers the dsRNA helix stability because it stabilizes the ssRNA by decreasing the electrostatic repulsion in ssRNA; and it causes a stronger ion concentration dependence of the helix stability. Larger Δ*z* means smaller charge density of ssRNA, thus larger difference in the charge density between ssRNA and dsRNA. This would cause a stronger cation concentration-dependence of the stability shown as steeper curves in Fig. 13, *A* and *B*. Similarly, a smaller Δ*z* would cause a weaker cation concentration dependence of the stability.

*G*°

_{37}as functions of [Na

^{+}] (

*A*,

*C*) and [Mg

^{2+}] (

*B*,

*D*) concentrations for different structural parameters of ssRNA. Panels

*A*and

*C*are for pure Na

^{+}solutions ([Mg

^{2+}] =

**...**

Second, we use (*r*_{p}, Δ*z*) = (7.3 Å, 1.6 Å), and (6.5 Å, 2.3 Å), both with fixed *d*_{p–p} 4.4 Å. Fig. 13, *C* and *D*, shows that the predicted Δ*G*°_{37} is nearly unchanged. This is because the charge density of ssRNA is approximately unchanged for the fixed *d*_{p–p}. Thus the stability Δ*G*°_{37} is nearly unchanged.

From the above two test cases, we find that the theoretical predictions for the helix stability are stable for different ssRNA parameters with fixed *d*_{p–p}. Strictly speaking, the structure of ssRNA is dependent on sequence, salt, and temperature. Furthermore, an ensemble of conformations for an ssRNA may exist. Therefore, it is a simplified approximation to use a mean structure to represent the ensemble of ssRNA structures (11,93,107), whose distribution is dependent on the temperature, sequence, and salt conditions. Such an approximation may attribute to the (slight) difference between our TBI results for the dsRNA helix stability and the experimental data.

## CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS

We have developed a generalized tightly bound ion (TBI) model to treat 1), RNA stability in both pure and mixed salt solutions; and 2), DNA helix stability in mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions. Based on the TBI model, we investigate the thermal stability of RNA and DNA helices in the mixed Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} solutions for different helix lengths and different salt concentrations (0–1 M for Na^{+} and 0.1–0.3 M for Mg^{2+}). The predicted folding free energy Δ*G*°_{37} and melting temperature *T*_{m} for the helix-coil transition agree with the available experimental data.

For the mixed Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} solutions with different molar ratio, the helix stability has different behaviors for three distinctive ion concentration regimes: Na^{+}-dominating, Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} competing, and Mg^{2+}-dominating. For the Na^{+}-dominating case, both TBI model and PB theory can successfully predict thermodynamics of RNA and DNA helix stability. For the Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} competition and Mg^{2+}-dominating cases, the PB theory underestimates the roles of Mg^{2+} in stabilizing RNA and DNA helices, while the TBI model can give improved predictions. Moreover, in the Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} competing regime, the addition of Na^{+} can slightly destabilizes the RNA and DNA helix stability, and such competition between Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} is stronger for longer helices.

Based on the predictions from the TBI model and the agreement between the predictions and experimental data, we obtain empirical formulas for the folding free energy and the melting temperature as functions of helix length and Na^{+}/Mg^{2+} concentrations for both RNA and DNA helices. The empirical relations are tested against the available experimental results, and can be useful for practical use in predicting RNA and DNA helix stability in mixed Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} solutions.

Although the predictions from the TBI model agree with the available experimental data, the present studies for DNA and RNA helix stabilities are limited by several simplified assumptions. First, the helix stability calculation is based on the decoupled electrostatic and nonelectrostatic contributions. Second, the helix-coil transition is assumed to be a two-state transition between the mean structures of the double-stranded (ds) and the single-stranded (ss) helices, and the sequence and salt-dependence of the coil (modeled as ss helix) structure is neglected. In fact, ssDNA and ssRNA are denatured structures, which, depending on the sequence and ionic condition, can adopt an ensemble of different conformations (108,109). The sequence- and ion-dependent uncertainty of the ssDNA and ssRNA structures and the possible existence of partially unfolded intermediates may contribute to the theory-experiment differences, especially for RNAs, which can be quite flexible. Third, we neglect the heat capacity change in the helix to coil transition, which may also contribute to the difference between theoretical predictions and experimental results, especially when melting temperature is far away from 37°C. In addition, for bound ions, we neglect the possible dehydration effect (9), and neglect the binding of ions (including anions) to specific functional groups of nucleotides in the tightly bound region. The site-specific binding of dehydrated cations can make important contributions to the nucleic acid tertiary structure folding stability. In the simple DNA and RNA helical structures studied here, the effect of the binding to specific groups (sites) and the associated dehydration may be weaker than that in tertiary structure folding.

## Acknowledgments

We thank Richard Owczarzy and Irina A. Shkel for helpful communications on modeling nucleic acid helix stability.

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences through grant No. GM063732 (to S.-J.C).

## APPENDIX A: STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR dsRNA AND ssRNA

The dsRNA helix is modeled as an A-form helix (1). We use the grooved primitive model (74–78) to model the A-RNA helix. It has been shown that the grooved primitive model of DNA is able to give detailed ion distribution that agrees well with the all-atomic simulations (78). In the grooved primitive model, like that of DNA helix (74–78), an RNA helical basepair is represented by five spheres (74–77): one central large central sphere with radius 3.9 Å, two phosphate spheres with radii 2.1 Å, and two neutral spheres with radii 2.1 Å (78). For the canonical A-RNA, the coordinates of phosphate spheres () are given by the canonical coordinates from x-ray measurements (104): ; and where *s* = 1, 2 denotes the two strands and *i* = 1, 2, …*N* denotes the nucleotides on each strand. The parameters ( ) for the initial positions are (0°, 0 Å) for the first strand and (153.6°, 1.88 Å) for the second strand, respectively. The neutral spheres have the same angular coordinates except they have the smaller radial coordinates 5.8 Å (74–78); and the centers of the central large spheres are on the axis of DNA helix. Each phosphate sphere carries a point elementary charge −*q* at its center. In Fig. 1, we show a dsRNA helix produced from the primitive grooved model.

Like ssDNA (75), we model ssRNA as a mean single helical structure averaged over the experimentally measured structures (105,110–114). We make use of the primitive grooved model-to-model ssRNA, and there are three structure parameters: radial coordinate of phosphates *r*_{p}, twist angle per residue Δ*θ*, and rise per basepair Δ*z*. We use *r*_{p} = 7 Å, and we take Δ*z* = 1.9 Å and keep Δ*θ* = 32.7°, which is the same as that of dsRNA. Δ*z*(= 1.9 Å) is slightly smaller than that of ssDNA, which is in the same trend as the structural parameters fitted from the cylindrical PB model (43); see Appendix B. For ssRNA, the phosphate charge positions (*ρ*_{i}, *θ*_{i}, *z*_{i}) can be given by the following equations: *ρ*_{i} = 7(Å); *θ*_{i} = *i* 32.73°; and *z*_{i} = *i* 1.9(Å). The distance between two adjacent phosphates is ~4.4 Å. As a control, we also perform the calculations for other two different sets of structure parameters for ssRNA: (Δ*θ*, *r*_{p}, Δ*z*) = (32.73°, 7.3 Å, 1.6 Å) and (Δ*θ*, *r*_{p}, Δ*z*) = (32.73°, 6.5 Å, 2.3 Å) and only found slight changes in the results, as shown in main text.

## APPENDIX B: STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR DSDNA AND SSDNA

The dsDNA helix is modeled as the canonical B-form since it is the most common and stable form over a wide range of sequences and ionic conditions (1,105). In the grooved primitive model for DNA, a helical basepair is represented by five spheres (74–77): one large central sphere with radius 4 Å, two phosphate spheres with radii 2.1 Å, and two neutral spheres with radii 2.1 Å (78). The centers of the central large spheres are on the axis of DNA helix; the phosphate spheres are placed at the centers of the phosphate groups; the neutral spheres lie between phosphate spheres and central large one. The coordinates of phosphate spheres ( ) are given by the canonical coordinates of B-DNA from x-ray measurements (103): ; and where *s* = 1, 2 denotes the two strands and *i* = 1, 2, …*N* denotes the nucleotides on each strand. The parameters () for the initial position are (0°, 0 Å) for the first strand and (154.4°, 0.78 Å) for the second strand, respectively. The neutral spheres have the same angular coordinates except they have smaller radial coordinates 5.9 Å (74–78). Each phosphate sphere carries a point elementary charge −*q* at its center.

For ssDNA, we use the same helical structure as that used in our previous study (75), with the use of the grooved primitive model (74–78). We use *r*_{p} = 7 Å and Δ*z* = 2.2 Å, and keep Δ*θ* = 36°, which is the same as that of dsDNA (75). Therefore, for ssDNA, the phosphate charge positions (*ρ*_{i}, *θ*_{i}, *z*_{i}) can be given by the following equations (75): *ρ*_{i} = 7(Å); *θ*_{i} = *i* 36°; *z*_{i} = *i* 2.2(Å) (75). As a control, we have performed calculations for other two different sets of structure parameters for ssDNA: (Δ*θ*, *r*_{p}, Δ*z*) = (36°, 7.5 Å, 1.8 Å) and (Δ*θ*, *r*_{p}, Δ*z*) = (36°, 6.4 Å, 2.6 Å) and found only negligible changes in the predictions.

## APPENDIX C: FORMULAS FOR Δ*G*_{B} AND Δ*G*_{D}

In the calculation of Δ*G*_{b}, the electrostatic interaction potential energy inside the tightly bound region *U*_{b} is given by the sum of all the possible pairwise charge-charge interactions (74–77),

where *u*_{ii} is the Coulomb interactions between the charges in cell *i* and *u*_{ij} is the Coulomb interactions between the charges in cell *i* and in cell *j*. We compute the potential of mean force Φ_{1}(*i*) for *u*_{ii} and Φ_{2}(*i*, *j*) for *u*_{ij} (74–77) as

The above averaging … is over all the possible positions (**R**_{i}, **R**_{j}) of the tightly bound ion(s) in the respective tightly bound cell(s). From Φ_{1}(*i*) and Φ_{2}(*i*, *j*), Δ*G*_{b} is given by (74–77)

To calculate Δ*G*_{d}, we use the results of the mean-field PB theory for the diffusive ions (115,116), and we have (74–77)

where the first and second integrals correspond to the enthalpic and entropic parts of the free energy, respectively. The value *ψ*′(**r**) is the electrostatic potential for the system without the diffusive salt ions. The value *ψ*′(**r**) is involved since *ψ* (**r**) − *ψ*′(**r**) gives the contribution of the diffusive ions to total electrostatic potential. The values *ψ* (**r**) and *ψ*′(**r**) are obtained from solving the nonlinear PB and the Poisson equation (salt-free), respectively.

## APPENDIX D: SIMPLIFICATIONS FOR THE CALCULATIONS OF Δ*G*_{D}

In the TBI model, we assume that the electrostatic potential outside the tightly bound region only depends on the equilibrium distribution of charges inside the tightly bound region (74–77). Thus, for each given number of total bound ions *N*_{b} (0 ≤ *N*_{b} ≤ 2*N* (76)), for a *N*-bp helix, we need to solve nonlinear PB and Poisson equations to obtain the free energy Δ*G*_{d} (see Eq. 34) for the diffusive ions. We have developed a simplified algorithm to treat Δ*G*_{d}. The essential idea of the simplification on PB-related calculations for Δ*G*_{d} is to decrease the number of nonlinear PB equations and Poisson equations that need to be evaluated in the TBI theory. The simplification is based on the fact that the free energies Δ*G*_{d} show smooth functional relations with the number of tightly bound ions (*N*_{b}) for different ion concentrations (shown in Fig. 14). Thus, the free energies (Δ*G*_{d}) can be obtained from a fitted polynomial without solving PB and Poisson equation for each *N*_{b} (0 ≤ *N*_{b} ≤ 2*N*). In our present algorithm, we select eight specific *N*_{b} values (*N*_{b} = 0, *N*/4, *N*/2, 3*N*/4, *N*, 4*N*/3, 5*N*/3, and 2*N*). After obtaining Δ*G*_{d} for these eight *N*_{b} by solving the PB and the Poisson equations, we fit the Δ*G*_{d}-*N*_{b} relationship by a polynomial. The free energy Δ*G*_{d} for any given *N*_{b} can be obtained from the fitted polynomial; see Fig. 14 for the comparisons between the values from the explicit PB calculations and those from the fitted polynomial. The two methods give almost exactly the same results for different ion concentrations. Based on the simplification, we only need to treat nonlinear PB equations (and Poisson equations) for several *N*_{b} even for longer polyanions, then the computational complexity of PB-related calculations is significantly reduced, especially for long helices.

## APPENDIX E: PARAMETER SETS AND NUMERICAL DETAILS

In this study, ions are assumed to be hydrated (74–77), and the radii of hydrated Na^{+} and Mg^{2+} ions are taken as 3.5 Å and 4.5 Å (74–77,99), respectively. We also use smaller radius (~3.5 Å) for Mg^{2+} to fit the PB predictions to the experimental data. In the computation with PB equation, the dielectric constant *ε* of molecule interior is set to be 12, an experimentally derived value (117), and *ε* of solvent is assumed to be the value of bulk water. At 25°C, the dielectric constant of water is ~78. The temperature-dependence of solvent dielectric constant *ε* is accounted for by using the empirical function (118)

where *t* is the temperature in Celsius.

Both the TBI and the PB calculations require numerical solution of the nonlinear PB. A thin layer of thickness of one cation radius is added to the molecular surface to account for the excluded volume layer of the cations (9,74–77). We also use the three-step focusing process to obtain the detailed ion distribution near the molecules (63,74–77). The grid size of the first run depends on the salt concentration used. Generally, we keep it larger than six times of Debye length to include all the ion effects in solutions, and the resolution of the first run varies with the grid size to make the iterative process viable within a reasonable computational time (74–77). The grid size (*L*_{x}, *L*_{y}, *L*_{z}) for the second and the third runs are kept at (102 Å, 102 Å, 136 Å) and (51 Å, 51 Å, 85 Å), respectively, and the corresponding resolutions are 0.85 Å per grid and 0.425 Å per grid, respectively. As a result, the number of the grid points is 121 × 121 × 161 in the second and 121 × 121 × 201 in the third run. Our results are tested against different grid sizes, and the results are robust.

## References

^{2+}concentration for kinetic folding of the

*Tetrahymena*ribozyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:12471–12476. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

^{2+}binding to RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:12456–12461. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

*Tetrahymena*ribozyme. I. Equilibrium stabilization by cations. J. Mol. Biol. 306:1157–1166. [PubMed]

*Tetrahymena*ribozyme. II. Counterion-dependence of folding kinetics. J. Mol. Biol. 309:57–68. [PubMed]

*Tetrahymena thermophila*ribozyme. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:928–933. [PubMed]

*Tetrahymena*ribozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 332:311–319. [PubMed]

*Tetrahymena*ribozyme by polyamines: importance of counterion valence and size. J. Mol. Biol. 341:27–36. [PubMed]

^{2+}-induced compaction of single RNA molecules monitored by tethered particle microscopy. Biophys. J. 90:3672–3685. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

*d*(CGCGAATTCGCG) self-complementary duplex in solution. Biochemistry. 21:428–436. [PubMed]

_{7}U

_{7}p. Biochemistry. 24:2086–2094. [PubMed]

^{1}H NMR study of the base pairing reaction of the d(GGAATTCC): salt effects on the equilibria and kinetics of strand association. Biochemistry. 30:754–758. [PubMed]

*G*°

_{37}) and melting temperature (

*T*

_{m}): NLPB analysis of experimental data. Biochemistry. 43:7090–7101. [PubMed]

^{+}and Mg

^{2+}ions on the helix-coil transition of DNA. Biopolymers. 14:2137–2158.

^{2+}, Ba

^{2+}, Mg

^{2+}, Ca

^{2+}, Mn

^{2+}, Co

^{2+}, Ni

^{2+}, and Cd

^{2+}. Biophys. J. 69:2623–2641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

^{+}, in 10 mM Mg

^{2+}, and in the presence of substrate. Biochemistry. 29:10147–10158. [PubMed]

^{+}and Mg

^{2+}ions. Biophys. J. 75:3041–3056. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

^{2+}, M

^{+}) accumulation and anion (X

^{−}) exclusion in mixed salt solutions of polyanionic DNA using Monte Carlo and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations of ion-polyion preferential interaction coefficients. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:3489–3504.

^{2+}binding isotherms for nucleic acids using Poisson-Boltzmann theory. J. Mol. Biol. 294:1135–1147. [PubMed]

^{2+}ions to polyadenylate, polyuridylate, and their complexes. Biopolymers. 10:2459–2490. [PubMed]

^{2+}and Mn

^{2+}. Biopolymers. 12:405–421.

^{2+}, deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations with comparison to alternative empirical formulas. Clin. Chem. 47:1956–1961. [PubMed]

**The Biophysical Society**

## Formats:

- Article |
- PubReader |
- ePub (beta) |
- PDF (1.7M)

- Nucleic acid helix stability: effects of salt concentration, cation valence and size, and chain length.[Biophys J. 2006]
*Tan ZJ, Chen SJ.**Biophys J. 2006 Feb 15; 90(4):1175-90. Epub 2005 Nov 18.* - Salt contribution to RNA tertiary structure folding stability.[Biophys J. 2011]
*Tan ZJ, Chen SJ.**Biophys J. 2011 Jul 6; 101(1):176-87.* - Predicting ion binding properties for RNA tertiary structures.[Biophys J. 2010]
*Tan ZJ, Chen SJ.**Biophys J. 2010 Sep 8; 99(5):1565-76.* - RNA folding: conformational statistics, folding kinetics, and ion electrostatics.[Annu Rev Biophys. 2008]
*Chen SJ.**Annu Rev Biophys. 2008; 37:197-214.* - On the role of magnesium ions in RNA stability.[Biopolymers. 1998]
*Misra VK, Draper DE.**Biopolymers. 1998; 48(2-3):113-35.*

- MELTING, a flexible platform to predict the melting temperatures of nucleic acids[BMC Bioinformatics. ]
*Dumousseau M, Rodriguez N, Juty N, Novère NL.**BMC Bioinformatics. 13101* - Predicting ion-nucleic acid interactions by energy landscape-guided sampling[Journal of chemical theory and computation....]
*He Z, Chen SJ.**Journal of chemical theory and computation. 2012 Jun 12; 8(6)2095-2101* - Ion-Mediated RNA Structural Collapse: Effect of Spatial Confinement[Biophysical Journal. 2012]
*Tan ZJ, Chen SJ.**Biophysical Journal. 2012 Aug 22; 103(4)827-836* - Non-specific binding of Na+ and Mg2+ to RNA determined by force spectroscopy methods[Nucleic Acids Research. 2012]
*Bizarro CV, Alemany A, Ritort F.**Nucleic Acids Research. 2012 Aug; 40(14)6922-6935* - Nascent RNA structure modulates the transcriptional dynamics of RNA polymerases[Proceedings of the National Academy of Scie...]
*Zamft B, Bintu L, Ishibashi T, Bustamante C.**Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012 Jun 5; 109(23)8948-8953*

- RNA Helix Stability in Mixed Na+/Mg2+ SolutionRNA Helix Stability in Mixed Na+/Mg2+ SolutionBiophysical Journal. May 15, 2007; 92(10)3615PMC

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

See more...