• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of amjpatholAmerican Journal of Pathology For AuthorsAmerican Journal of Pathology SubscribeAmerican Journal of Pathology SearchAmerican Journal of Pathology Current IssueAmerican Journal of Pathology About the JournalAmerican Journal of Pathology
Am J Pathol. Feb 2002; 160(2): 433–440.
PMCID: PMC1850659

Translocation, Deletion/Amplification, and Expression of HMGIC and MDM2 in a Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma


Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CexPA) is a carcinoma developing within a pre-existing benign pleomorphic adenoma (PA). Here we describe the identification and characterization of a series of genetic events leading to translocation, deletion/amplification, and overexpression of the HMGIC and MDM2 genes in a CexPA at an early stage of development. The tumor had a pseudodiploid stemline karyotype with a del(5)(q22–23q32–33) and a t(10;12)(p15;q14–15). In addition, there were several sidelines with double minute chromosomes (dmin) or homogeneously staining regions (hsr). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping revealed that the 12q14–15 breakpoint was located centromeric to HMGIC and that the entire gene was juxtaposed to the der(10) chromosome. Detailed analysis of cells with dmin and hsr revealed that HMGIC and MDM2 were deleted from the der(10) and that the dmin and hsr were strongly positive for both genes. Southern blot analysis confirmed that both HMGIC and MDM2 were amplified and that no gross rearrangements of the genes had occurred. Immunostaining revealed that the HMGIC protein was highly overexpressed particularly in the large polymorphic cells within the carcinomatous part of the tumor. These findings suggest that amplification and overexpression of HMGIC and possibly MDM2 might be important genetic events that may contribute to malignant transformation of benign PA.

The pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most common type of salivary gland neoplasm. It is usually a benign, slow-growing tumor originating from the minor and major salivary glands. 1 Microscopically, PA show a wide morphological spectrum with mainly epithelial and myoepithelial cells forming a variety of patterns in a mucoid, myxoid, or chondroid matrix. Occasionally, these normally benign tumors may undergo malignant transformation. The frequency by which this occurs varies in different series from about 2 to 23%. For example, in the AFIP series of 326 carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CexPA) cases, they represented 4.5% of all PA and 6.5% of all malignant salivary gland tumors. 2 The incidence of malignant transformation increases with the preoperative duration of the tumors. 3 CexPA is usually an aggressive tumor. Almost one-half of the patients develop recurrences, and approximately one-third of the patients with parotid tumors develop metastases.

Cytogenetic information about the chromosomal pattern in CexPA is scarce; only 14 cases have so far been analyzed. 4-14 In contrast, our knowledge about the cytogenetics of benign PA is comprehensive. Karyotypic data are available for almost 500 cases. 15-18 About 70% of the tumors have abnormal karyotypes. Four major cytogenetic subgroups have been identified, ie, tumors with rearrangements involving 8q12 (39%), tumors with rearrangements of 12q14–15 (8%), tumors with sporadic, clonal changes not involving 8q12 or 12q14–15 (23%), and tumors with an apparently normal karyotype (30%).

Recently, we identified the genes consistently rearranged in PA with 8q12 and 12q14–15 abnormalities. The target gene in 8q12 is PLAG1, a developmentally regulated zinc finger gene. 19-21 The translocations result in promoter swapping/substitution between PLAG1 and a ubiquitously expressed translocation partner gene (eg, CTNNB1, LIFR, or SII), leading to activation of PLAG1 expression. The breakpoints invariably occur in the 5′ non-coding regions of both the target gene and the promoter donor genes. The target gene in adenomas with rearrangements of 12q14–15 is the high mobility group protein gene, HMGIC. 22-24 This gene is also rearranged in a variety of mesenchymal tumors. 22,25 HMGIC encodes an architectural transcription factor that promotes activation of gene expression by modulating the conformation of DNA. 26 The protein has three DNA-binding domains (AT-hook motifs) that bind to the minor groove of AT-rich DNA. 27 The majority of breakpoints in HMGIC occur within the third large intron, resulting in separation of the DNA-binding domains from the highly acidic, carboxy-terminal domain. Several translocation partner genes have been identified, including ALDH2, LPP, LHFP, RAD51B, COX6C, HEI10, FHIT, and NF1B. 23,24,28-33 The two latter are fusion partners identified in PA with t(3;12) and ins(9;12). 23,24 Since no common functional domain so far has been identified among the translocation partners, the critical event seems to be the separation of the DNA-binding domains from the acidic carboxy-terminal tail of HMGIC. 23

We report here extensive molecular cytogenetic characterization of a CexPA at an early stage of development. Detailed analysis revealed a t(10;12)(p15;q15) translocation with a 12q breakpoint 5′ of HMGIC and translocation of the entire gene to the 10p+ marker chromosome followed by deletion/amplification of a segment containing HMGIC and MDM2 from this marker. The amplified sequences were mapped to double minute chromosomes (dmin) and homogeneously staining regions (hsr). These findings suggest that amplification of HMGIC and MDM2 might be important genetic events in the malignant transformation of benign PA.

Materials and Methods

Tumor Material and Cytogenetic Analysis

Fresh tumor tissue was obtained from a 35-year-old woman who had a several months history of a tumor in the left parotid gland. The tumor, which measured 11 × 18 × 20 mm, was removed with tumor-free margins by a superficial parotidectomi. Macroscopically, the tumor was circumscribed and had solid, gray-white cut surfaces. Microscopic examination revealed a cell-rich salivary gland tumor with occasional foci characteristic of PA with monomorphic tumor cells growing in strands and nests in a hyalinized stroma (Figure 1,A) [triangle] . The overall histological appearance was, however, that of a carcinoma with pronounced cellular polymorphism (Figure 1, B and C) [triangle] . Certain solid areas were comprised of small cells with minimal cytoplasm, others of large polymorphic, cytoplasm-rich cells. There was a pronounced cellular atypia with enlarged, polymorphic, and hyperchromatic nuclei containing prominent nucleoli (Figure 1, B and C) [triangle] . Serial sections of the tumor specimen revealed areas of microinvasion with growth of tumor nests in a vascularized stroma (Figure 1D) [triangle] . Immunostaining revealed that the polymorphic tumor cells had a strong nuclear positivity for the HMGIC oncoprotein (Figure 1E) [triangle] (see Results). Occasional mitotic figures were observed in the carcinomatous areas. Focally, the tumor showed a moderate proliferative activity as judged by immunostaining of Ki-67 (Figure 1F) [triangle] . Immunostains for cytokeratin (CAM 5.2), vimentin and S100 were also positive in parts of the tumor.

Figure 1.
Morphology of the carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. A: Residual PA with mainly nonluminal tumor cells in a hyaline stroma. B and C: Details of the carcinomatous component of the tumor. Note the pronounced cellular atypia with enlarged, polymorphic and ...

The overall morphological picture of the tumor with high cellularity, pronounced cellular polymorphism, and microinvasion together with the results of the immunostains were considered compatible with the diagnosis of a CexPA at an early stage of development. Subsequently, a total parotidectomi was performed. Histopathological examination revealed no signs of tumor growth in the resected specimens. The patient received no adjuvant treatment. Three years postoperatively there were no signs of local recurrences or metastases.

Primary cultures were established from a fresh, unfixed specimen of the primary tumor as previously described. 34 Chromosome preparations were made from exponentially growing primary cultures and these were subsequently G-banded and analyzed using standard procedures.

FISH and Spectral Karyotype Analyses

Metaphase spreads used for FISH were prepared from cells stored in fixative at −20°C. The following probes were used: whole chromosome painting probes specific for chromosomes 5, 9, 10, 12, and 13 (Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, IL); CEPH YACs 975B8 (SAS/CDK4); 811A7 (MDM2); 452E1 (HMGIC); the LL12NCO1-derived cosmid clones 142H1 and 27E12 (containing exons 1–2 and 4–5, respectively, of HMGIC); 22 the microdissection library ML12q13–15 (specific for the 12q13–15 segment); and the PAC-clones PAC233 and PAC235 (PLAG1). DNAs were either amplified by InterAlu-PCR and labeled with biotin-16-dUTP (Roche Diagnostic, Basel, Switzerland) or labeled with biotin-16-dUTP (Roche Diagnostic), and subsequently cohybridized with α-satellite probes for chromosomes 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13 (Appligene Oncor, Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA) in different combinations. Hybridization and probe detection were as previously described. 35 Chromosomes were counter-stained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI). FISH analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were performed using the tissue conversion kit S1337-TC and in situ hybridization kit S1340 (Appligene Oncor). The sections were counter-stained with propidium iodide. Fluorescence signals were digitalized, processed, and analyzed using the PowerGene FISH image analysis system (Applied Imaging International Ltd., Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK).

Spectral karyotype (SKY) analysis was performed using the SkyPaint probe kit which consists of a cocktail of 24 differentially labeled chromosome specific painting probes (ASI-Applied Spectral Imaging Ltd., Migdal Ha’Emek, Israel). The conditions for pretreatment, hybridization, posthybridization washes, detection, and analyses were as previously described 36 and as recommended by the manufacturer.

Immunohistochemical Analysis

Tissue sections were processed according to the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized, treated in a microwave oven and exposed to hydrogen peroxidase. A polyclonal HMGIC antibody was obtained by immunizing rabbits with a peptide corresponding to a sequence in the N-terminal part of the human HMGIC protein (SARGEGAGQPSTSA) (GSAB4, dilution 1:25; Innovagen AB, Lund, Sweden). The antiserum was affinity purified using the same peptide. The specificity of the antibody was confirmed by analysis of known HMGIC positive and negative PA. 21 The MDM2 protein was detected by two mouse monoclonal antibodies; clone IF2 (dilution 4 μg/ml; CN Biosciences, Inc./Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) recognizes an epitope within amino acid residues 26–169 of the human MDM2 protein and clone 1B10 (dilution 1:50; Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK) recognizes an epitope in the carboxy-terminal portion of the MDM2 protein. Other primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry were: TP53 (DO-7, dilution 1:200; DAKO A/F, Glostrup, Denmark), Ki-67 (MIB-1, dilution 1:100; DAKO), cytokeratin (CAM 5.2, dilution 1:10; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), vimentin (dilution 1:400; DAKO), and S100 (dilution 1:1000; DAKO). Control sections were incubated identically, except for the primary antibodies, which were replaced by bovine serum in TBS.

Southern Blot Analysis

Four μg of normal and tumor DNAs were digested with HindIII, electrophoresed in a 0.8% agarose gel in 0.5X tris-borate-ethylenediamine-tetra-acetic acid (TBE) buffer, and transferred to a Hybond N+ membrane. The MDM2 probe used was a 600-bp fragment corresponding to nucleotides 53 to 653 of the human cDNA (GenBank accession number Z12020). Two HMGIC probes were used: an 83-bp fragment derived from the 5′ non-translated region which corresponds to nucleotides 1–83 of the HMGIC cDNA (GenBank accession number Z31595) and a 225-bp fragment derived from the 3′ flanking region corresponding to nucleotides 18–242 of STS 12-RM133 (GenBank accession number U27137). As control for equal loading of DNA a 506-bp probe corresponding to the entire coding region of the CHOP gene in 12q13 (nucleotides 75–581; GenBank accession number X67083) was used. Probes were labeled with α-[32P]dCTP by random priming or by specific primers.

TP53 Mutation Analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from tumor cells using standard methods. Exons 4–9 of the TP53 gene were amplified as previously described. 37 For DNA sequence analysis, 40 μl of the PCR products were denatured and the strands were separated using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280, Dynal, Norway). Solid support sequencing was performed using the Sequenase Version 2.0 (US Biochemical, Cleveland, OH). Samples were run on 6% denaturating polyacrylamide gels for 1.5 to 4.5 hours and subsequently exposed to x-ray films.


Cytogenetic, SKY, and FISH Analyses

Cytogenetic analysis of short-term cultured cells revealed that the tumor had the stemline karyotype 46, XX, del(5)(q22–23q32–33), t(10;12)(p15;q15)[11] (Figure 2,A) [triangle] . There were also four closely related sidelines with the karyotypes 46, XX, del(5)(q22–23q32–33), t(10;12)(p15;q15),1–34dmin[13]/46, XX, del(5)(q22–23q32–33), t(10;12)(p15;q15), hsr(13)(q14)[5]/46, XX, t(X;6)(p11.2;q27), del(5)(q22–23q32–33), t(10;12)(p15;q15)[5]/46, XX, del(5)(q22–23q32–33), hsr(9)(p22–24), t(10;12)(p15;q15)[3] (Figure 2, B and C) [triangle] . In addition, there were seven cells with a normal female karyotype. To confirm the presence of the del(5), t(10;12), and t(X;6) and to search for possible cryptic rearrangements, we also performed SKY analysis. Detailed analysis of the SKY and DAPI-band images from 5 metaphases corroborated the cytogenetic observations. No cryptic rearrangements were detected. Analysis of one cell with dmin suggested that the dmin contained chromosome 12 sequences. FISH analysis using painting probes for chromosomes 5, 9, 10, 12, and 13 confirmed that both the dmin and the hsr(9) and hsr(13) were derived from chromosome 12.

Figure 2.
A: Partial G-banded karyotype of the Cet PA tumor showing the del(5)(q22–23q31–32) and the t(10;12)(p15;q14–15) translocation. B: G-banded chromosome 9 and 13 homologues with hsr’s in 9p22–24 and 13q14. C: Partial ...

To further map the chromosome 12q15 breakpoint in relation to HMGIC, SAS, CDK4, and MDM2 (all located at 12q14–15) we used the microdissection library ML12q13–15 as well as YAC and cosmid clones containing these genes. Detailed mapping revealed that the 12q15 breakpoint was located proximal to HMGIC, but distal to the SAS and CDK4 genes, resulting in translocation of the entire HMGIC gene to the der(10) marker (Figure 2D) [triangle] . Hybridization with cosmid clones corresponding to the 5′- and 3′-parts of HMGIC confirmed that the gene was not split by the translocation. The dmin and hsr were strongly positive for HMGIC (both 5′ and 3′ sequences) (Figure 2E) [triangle] and MDM2 (located distal to HMGIC) (Figure 2F) [triangle] , but not for SAS or CDK4, indicating that HMGIC and MDM2 are coamplified in the dmin and hsr. Interestingly, in the metaphases containing dmin or hsr, no signals could be observed from the HMGIC and MDM2 containing YACs on the der(10) marker (Figure 2F) [triangle] . This indicates that both genes were deleted from this marker and that the deleted segment originally was not eliminated but retained as dmin or as an hsr. FISH analysis of the PLAG1 locus at 8q12 revealed signals only on the two chromosome 8 homologues, indicating that PLAG1 is not rearranged.

Amplification and Expression of HMGIC and MDM2

Southern blot analysis of tumor DNA showed that both HMGIC and MDM2 were amplified compared to normal control DNA (Figure 3) [triangle] . Hybridization with probes corresponding to the 5′ and 3′ parts of HMGIC, respectively, revealed that the entire gene was amplified. No rearrangement of the HMGIC or MDM2 genes was observed. Control hybridization with a CHOP probe showed that CHOP, which is located centromeric to HMGIC in band 12q13, was not amplified.

Figure 3.
Southern blot analysis of normal (N) and tumor (T) DNAs showing amplification of the HMGIC and MDM2 genes. DNAs were digested with HindIII, electrophoresed, transferred, and sequentially hybridized with probes for HMGIC (5′ and 3′ sequences), ...

FISH analysis of tissue sections from the tumor using HMGIC and MDM2 specific YACs revealed strong hybridization signals in about 25 to 50% of the tumor cells (Figure 2G) [triangle] . To study whether the amplified genes were expressed we used immunohistochemistry and HMGIC and MDM2 specific antibodies. Nuclear expression of the HMGIC protein was detected in about 25 to 50% of the tumor cells (Figure 1E) [triangle] . About half of these cells expressed high levels of HMGIC. The HMGIC protein localized to granular, nuclear structures similar in size and appearance to the so-called PML nuclear bodies. 38 A similar, but less pronounced pattern, could also be seen in the other HMGIC positive cells. The location of the HMGIC positive cells largely coincided with the location of the cells with strong FISH signals for HMGIC and MDM2. The strongest HMGIC staining was observed in large, polymorphic atypical nuclei (Figure 1E) [triangle] . Control staining of tissue sections from a PA with known overexpression of an HMGIC-NF1B fusion transcript due to an ins(9;12)(p23;q12q15) 24 revealed an evenly distributed nuclear expression of the protein in the majority of the tumor cells (not shown). No cells with very high expression levels were observed. Staining of sections from a PA without rearrangements of HMGIC revealed no nuclear staining in any of the tumor cells. Immunostaining for MDM2 revealed a few scattered positive cells. Similar results were obtained with both antibodies used. Immunostaining for TP53 protein was negative. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the TP53 gene revealed no mutations in exons 4 to 9.


In this communication we describe the identification and characterization of a series of genetic events leading to translocation, deletion/amplification, and overexpression of the HMGIC gene in a case of CexPA. The carcinoma, which was at a relatively early stage of development, had a stemline karyotype with a del(5)(q22–23q32–33) and a t(10;12)(p15;q15) as the sole cytogenetic abnormalities. Since translocations with breakpoints in 12q14–15 are characteristic of a subgroup of PA, 15-17 it is likely that the carcinoma originated from a PA belonging to this subgroup. FISH mapping revealed that the 12q breakpoint was located telomeric to CDK4 and SAS and centromeric to HMGIC and that the entire gene was juxtaposed to the der(10) chromosome. Although most translocation breakpoints in 12q15 are located within introns 3 and 4 of HMGIC, there are several cases of uterine leiomyomas 39 as well as single cases of PA 40 reported with breakpoints located either proximal or distal to HMGIC. For these cases as well as for the present case, a mechanism of deregulation not involving the generation of an HMGIC containing fusion transcript must be considered.

About one-half of the tumor cells carrying the t(10;12) translocation had also dmin or an hsr. FISH analysis of these cells revealed that the HMGIC and MDM2 genes were deleted from the der(10) chromosome and that the dmin and hsr were strongly positive for both genes. Detailed analysis showed that both genes were coamplified in the same dmin and hsr. Southern blot analysis confirmed that HMGIC and MDM2 were amplified and that no gross rearrangements of the genes had occurred. The mechanisms of gene amplification and of the generation of dmin and hsr in tumor cells are still somewhat obscure. Our findings of a series of genetic events leading to gene amplification in CexPA are in line with the proposed deletion-plus-episome model in which recombination leads to chromosomal deletion and episome formation. 41 The episomes may enlarge by homologous recombination and replication and as a consequence become visible as extrachromosomal dmin. The dmin can subsequently integrate at random chromosomal sites to generate an hsr. 42

The consequences of amplification of HMGIC and MDM2 on gene expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using HMGIC and MDM2 specific antibodies. Very high expression levels of HMGIC was found particularly in the large polymorphic nuclei within the carcinomatous part of the tumor, indicating that these cells contain the amplified HMGIC sequences. In contrast, the expression level of MDM2 was much lower. The reason for this discrepancy is not known. Since multiple forms of MDM2 proteins exist expressing different epitopes it could be that the monoclonal antibodies used in this study failed to detect the particular epitopes expressed in the tumor. Alternatively, the amplified MDM2 sequences were not expressed. In a previous study of soft tissue sarcomas only 6 of 11 cases with MDM2 amplification expressed the MDM2 protein. 43 FISH analysis of paraffin sections of the present tumor confirmed that the amplified HMGIC and MDM2 sequences preferentially were located in the carcinomatous part of the tumor.

Cytogenetic data on CexPA is scarce. Including the present case, karyotypic information is available only from 15 cases (13 salivary gland and two lacrimal gland tumors). 4-14 Eight of these have shown rearrangements of 8q12 and 3 cases have shown rearrangements of 12q13–15. Considering the frequency of these abnormalities in benign PA, carcinomas are likely to develop at similar frequencies in both subgroups of tumors. Cytogenetic evidence of gene amplification is found in 40% of the cases (6 of 15). The true frequency of gene amplification in CexPA could in fact be higher because amplification is not always visible at the cytogenetic level. Only two of the cases with cytogenetic manifestations of gene amplification have been studied in enough detail to permit identification of the genes amplified. Interestingly, both cases have shown amplification of 12q13–15 sequences, including HMGIC and MDM2 (the present case), and CDK4 and MDM2 . 13 The copy number of HMGIC is not known in the latter case. This case had also a second population of dmin with amplified MYC sequences. A third case had a 14q+ giant marker chromosome partially derived from 8q12-qter. 6 Whether PLAG1 and/or MYC are amplified on this marker is unknown. A fourth case of CexPA had ring chromosomes of varying sizes partially derived from chromosome 2, 8 ie, a chromosome harboring the MYCN gene, which is known to be amplified in several tumor types including neuroblastoma. Collectively, the current as well as previous observations suggest that gene amplification and overexpression of genes in 12q14–15, including CDK4, HMGIC and MDM2, may be important genetic events contributing to malignant transformation of benign PA. This conclusion is supported by the following observations: amplification of HMGIC, MDM2 and CDK4 are common in certain types of malignant tumors (eg, sarcomas and malignant gliomas 44,45 ); and dmin and hsr are almost never found in benign PA. Among nearly 500 cases analyzed cytogenetically only two such cases have been found. 14,46

Whether it is HMGIC and/or MDM2 that is the target gene(s) for the amplification is not known. In a study of 122 sarcomas Berner et al 44 found amplification of HMGIC in 13 cases and of MDM2 in 17 cases. HMGIC was always coamplified with MDM2. The pattern of amplification in sarcomas suggested that there was preferential selection for inclusion of HMGIC in the amplicons. This is in line with studies showing that the HMGIC protein is abundant only in transformed cells and that there exists a correlation between overexpression of HMGIC and a malignant phenotype. 47,48 Our finding that HMGIC was highly overexpressed preferentially in the large polymorphic nuclei in the carcinomatous parts of the tumor supports these observations. Also, amplification of MDM2 could be selected for by overexpression of the gene; the MDM2 protein is known to bind to and inactivate the TP53 tumor suppressor protein. 49

Other recurrent abnormalities that, in addition to gene amplification, could be of importance for malignant transformation of PA are gains of extra copies of chromosome 7 and deletions of segments distal to 5q22 found in three and two cases, respectively. We and others have previously also shown that alterations of TP53 (mutation and/or overexpression) are frequent in CexPA but not in benign PA. 37 The frequency of TP53 alterations in CexPA varies in different investigations from 29 to 67%. Genetic analysis of additional cases of CexPA are necessary to determine the frequency and nature of oncogene amplification and of deletions/mutations of tumor suppressor genes as well as their significance for malignant transformation of benign PA.


We thank professors Karl Donath and Gisle Bang for expert histopathological examination of this tumor. We also thank Ulrik Pedersen for expert help with the illustrations.


Address reprint requests to Prof. Göran Stenman, Lundberg Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Pathology, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail: .es.ug.dem.rcll@namnets.narog

Supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg Research Foundation, the Assar Gabrielsson Research Foundation, and the Johan Jansson Foundation for Cancer Research.


1. Waldron CA: Mixed tumor (pleomorphic adenoma and myoepithelioma). Ellis GL Auclair PL Gnepp DR eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. 1991, :pp 165-186 WB Saunders, Philadelphia
2. Gnepp DR, Wenig BM: Malignant mixed Tumors. Ellis GL Auclair PL Gnepp DR eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. 1991, :pp 350-368 WB Saunders, Philadelphia
3. Eneroth CM, Zetterberg A: Malignancy in pleomorphic adenoma: a clinical and microspectrophotometric study. Acta Otolaryngol 1974, 77:426-432 [PubMed]
4. Bullerdiek J, Hutter KJ, Brandt G, Weinberg M, Belge G, Bartnitzke S: Cytogenetic investigations on a cell line derived from a carcinoma arising in a salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1990, 44:253-262 [PubMed]
5. Bullerdiek J, Vollrath M, Wittekind C, Caselitz J, Bartnitzke S: Mucoepidermoid tumor of the parotid gland showing a translocation (3;8)(p21;q12) and a deletion (5)(q22) as sole chromosome abnormalities. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1990, 50:161-164 [PubMed]
6. Mark J, Wedell B, Dahlenfors R, Stenman G: Karyotypic variability and evolutionary characteristics of a polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma in the parotid gland. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1991, 55:19-29 [PubMed]
7. Higashi K, Jin Y, Heim S, Mandahl N, Biörklund A, Wennerberg J, Dictor M, Mitelman F: Chromosome abnormalities in a carcinoma in pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1991, 55:125-128 [PubMed]
8. Mark J, Dahlenfors R, Stenman G, Bende M, Melen I: Cytogenetical observations in two cases of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands. Anticancer Res 1992, 12:1195-1198 [PubMed]
9. Hrynchak M, White V, Berean K, Horsman D: Cytogenetic findings in seven lacrimal gland neoplasms. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1994, 75:133-138 [PubMed]
10. Jin Y, Mertens F, Limon J, Mandahl N, Wennerberg J, Dictor M, Heim S, Mitelman F: Characteristic karyotypic features in lacrimal and salivary gland carcinomas. Br J Cancer 1994, 70:42-47 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Mark HF, Hanna I, Gnepp DR: Cytogenetic analysis of salivary gland type tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 1996, 82:187-192 [PubMed]
12. Martins C, Fonseca I, Roque L, Pinto AE, Soares J: Malignant salivary gland neoplasms: a cytogenetic study of 19 cases. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996, 32:128-132 [PubMed]
13. Rao PH, Murty VV, Louie DC, Chaganti RS: Nonsyntenic amplification of MYC with CDK4 and MDM2 in a malignant mixed tumor of salivary gland. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998, 105:160-163 [PubMed]
14. Jin C, Martins C, Jin Y, Wiegant J, Wennerberg J, Dictor M, Gisselsson D, Strömbeck B, Fonseca I, Mitelman F, Tanke HJ, Höglund M, Mertens F: Characterization of chromosome aberrations in salivary gland tumors by FISH, including multicolor COBRA-FISH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001, 30:161-167 [PubMed]
15. Sandros J, Stenman G, Mark J: Cytogenetic and molecular observations in human and experimental salivary gland tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1990, 44:153-167 [PubMed]
16. Bullerdiek J, Wobst G, Meyer-Bolte K, Chilla R, Haubrich J, Thode B, Bartnitzke S: Cytogenetic subtyping of 220 salivary gland pleomorphic adenomas: correlation to occurrence, histological subtype, and in vitro cellular behavior. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1993, 65:27-31 [PubMed]
17. Mark J, Dahlenfors R, Wedell B: Impact of the in vitro technique used on the cytogenetic patterns in pleomorphic adenomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997, 95:9-15 [PubMed]
18. Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer. Edited by F Mitelman, B Johansson, F Mertens. http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman, 2001
19. Kas K, Voz ML, Röijer E, Åström AK, Meyen E, Stenman G, Van de Ven WJ: Promoter swapping between the genes for a novel zinc finger protein and beta-catenin in pleomorphic adenomas with t(3;8)(p21;q12) translocations. Nat Genet 1997, 15:170-174 [PubMed]
20. Voz ML, Åström AK, Kas K, Mark J, Stenman G, Van de Ven WJ: The recurrent translocation t(5;8)(p13;q12) in pleomorphic adenomas results in up-regulation of PLAG1 gene expression under control of the LIFR promoter. Oncogene 1998, 16:1409-1416 [PubMed]
21. Åström A-K, Voz ML, Kas K, Röijer E, Wedell B, Mandahl N, Van de Ven W, Mark J, Stenman G: Conserved mechanism of PLAG1 activation in salivary gland tumors with and without chromosome 8q12 abnormalities: identification of SII as a new fusion partner gene. Cancer Res 1999, 59:918-923 [PubMed]
22. Schoenmakers EF, Wanschura S, Mols R, Bullerdiek J, Van den Berghe H, Van de Ven WJ: Recurrent rearrangements in the high mobility group protein gene HMGI-C in benign mesenchymal tumours. Nat Genet 1995, 10:436-444 [PubMed]
23. Geurts JM, Schoenmakers EF, Röijer E, Stenman G, Van de Ven WJ: Expression of reciprocal hybrid transcripts of HMGIC and FHIT in a pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland. Cancer Res 1997, 57:13-17 [PubMed]
24. Geurts JM, Schoenmakers EF, Röijer E, Åström AK, Stenman G, Van de Ven WJ: Identification of NF1B as recurrent translocation partner gene of HMGIC in pleomorphic adenomas. Oncogene 1998, 16:865-872 [PubMed]
25. Ashar HR, Fejzo MS, Tkachenko A, Zhou X, Fletcher JA, Weremowicz S, Morton CC, Chada K: Disruption of the architectural factor HMGI-C: DNA-binding AT hook motifs fused in lipomas to distinct transcriptional regulatory domains. Cell 1995, 82:57-65 [PubMed]
26. Wolffe AP: Architectural transcription factors. Science 1994, 264:1100-1101 [PubMed]
27. Reeves R, Nissen MS: The AT-DNA-binding domain of mammalian high mobility group I chromosomal proteins: a novel peptide motif for recognizing DNA structure. J Biol Chem 1990, 265:8573-8582 [PubMed]
28. Kazmierczak B, Hennig Y, Wanschura S, Rogalla P, Bartnitzke S, Van de Ven W, Bullerdiek J: Description of a novel fusion transcript between HMGI-C, a gene encoding for a member of the high mobility group proteins, and the mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase gene. Cancer Res 1995, 55:6038-6039 [PubMed]
29. Petit MMR, Mols R, Schoenmakers EF, Mandahl N, Van de Ven WJ: LPP, the preferred fusion partner gene of HMGIC in lipomas, is a novel member of the LIM protein gene family. Genomics 1996, 36:118-129 [PubMed]
30. Petit MM, Schoenmakers EF, Huysmans C, Geurts JM, Mandahl N, Van de Ven WJ: LHFP, a novel translocation partner gene of HMGIC in a lipoma, is a member of a new family of LHFP-like genes. Genomics 1999, 57:438-441 [PubMed]
31. Schoenmakers EF, Huysmans C, Van de Ven WJ: Allelic knockout of novel splice variants of human recombination repair gene RAD51B in t(12;14) uterine leiomyomas. Cancer Res 1999, 59:19-23 [PubMed]
32. Kurose K, Mine N, Doi D, Ota Y, Yoneyama K, Konishi H, Araki T, Emi M: Novel gene fusion of COX6C at 8q22–23 to HMGIC at 12q15 in a uterine leiomyoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000, 27:303-307 [PubMed]
33. Mine N, Kurose K, Konishi H, Araki T, Nagai H, Emi M: Fusion of a sequence from HEI10 (14q11) to the HMGIC gene at 12q15 in a uterine leiomyoma. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001, 92:135-139 [PubMed]
34. Nordkvist A, Mark J, Gustafsson H, Bang G, Stenman G: Non-random chromosome rearrangements in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1994, 10:115-121 [PubMed]
35. Röijer E, Kas K, Klawitz I, Bullerdiek J, Van de Ven W, Stenman G: Identification of a yeast artificial chromosome spanning the 8q12 translocation breakpoint in pleomorphic adenomas with t(3;8)(p21;q12). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1996, 17:166-171 [PubMed]
36. Sjögren H, Wedell B, Meis-Kindblom J, Kindblom L-G, Stenman G: Fusion of the NH2-terminal domain of the basic helix-loop-helix protein TCF12 to TEC in extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma with translocation t(9;15)(q22;q21). Cancer Res 2000, 60:6832-6835 [PubMed]
37. Nordkvist A, Röijer E, Bang G, Gustafsson H, Behrendt M, Ryd W, Thoresen S, Donath K, Stenman G: Expression and mutation patterns of p53 in benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Int J Oncol 2000, 16:477-483 [PubMed]
38. Zhong S, Salomoni P, Pandolfi PP: The transcriptional role of PML and the nuclear body. Nat Cell Biol 2000, 2:E85-E90 [PubMed]
39. Schoenberg Fejzo M, Ashar HR, Krauter KS, Powell WL, Rein MS, Weremowicz S, Yoon SJ, Kucherlapati RS, Chada K, Morton CC: Translocation breakpoints upstream of the HMGIC gene in uterine leiomyomata suggest dysregulation of this gene by a mechanism different from that in lipomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1996, 17:1-6 [PubMed]
40. Röijer E, Kas K, Behrendt M, Van de Ven W, Stenman G: FISH mapping of breakpoints in pleomorphic adenomas with 8q12–13 abnormalities identifies a subgroup of tumors without PLAG1 involvement. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999, 24:78-82 [PubMed]
41. Stark GR, Debatisse M, Giulotto E, Wahl GM: Recent progress in understanding mechanisms of mammalian DNA amplification. Cell 1989, 57:901-908 [PubMed]
42. Carrol SM, DeRose ML, Gaudray P, Moore CM, Needham-Vandevanter DR, Von Hoff DD, Wahl GM: Double minute chromosomes can be produced from precursors derived from a chromosomal deletion. Mol Cell Biol 1988, 8:1525-1533 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Cordon-Cardo C, Latres E, Drobnjak M, Oliva MR, Pollack D, Woodruff JM, Marechal V, Chen J, Brennan MF, Levine AJ: Molecular abnormalities of mdm2 and p53 genes in adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Res 1994, 54:794-799 [PubMed]
44. Berner JM, Meza-Zepeda LA, Kools PF, Forus A, Schoenmakers EF, Van de Ven WJ, Fodstad O, Myklebost O: HMGIC, the gene for an architectural transcription factor, is amplified and rearranged in a subset of human sarcomas. Oncogene 1997, 14:2935-2941 [PubMed]
45. Reifenberger G, Ichimura K, Reifenberger J, Elkahloun AG, Meltzer PS, Collins VP: Refined mapping of 12q13–q15 amplicons in human malignant gliomas suggests CDK4/SAS and MDM2 as independent amplification targets. Cancer Res 1996, 56:5141-5145 [PubMed]
46. Mark J, Dahlenfors R, Ekedahl C: On double-minutes and their origin in a benign human neoplasm, a mixed salivary gland tumour. Anticancer Res 1982, 2:261-264 [PubMed]
47. Patel UA, Bandiera A, Manfioletti G, Giancotti V, Chau KY, Crane-Robinsson C: Expression and cDNA cloning of human HMGI-C phosphoprotein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994, 201:63-70 [PubMed]
48. Chiapetta G, Bandiera A, Berlingieri MT, Visconti R, Manfioletti G, Battista S, Martinez-Tello FJ, Santoro M, Giancotti V, Fusco A: The expression of the high mobility group HMGI(Y) proteins correlates with the malignant phenotype of human thyroid neoplasias. Oncogene 1995, 10:1307-1314 [PubMed]
49. Momand J, Zambetti GP, Olson DC, George D, Levine AJ: The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation. Cell 1992, 69:1237-1245 [PubMed]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...