![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frataxin knockdown causes loss of cytoplasmic iron–sulfur cluster functions, redox alterations and induction of heme transcripts Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of California, 1311 Haring Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA * Corresponding author. Fax: +1 5307549342. E-mail address: Email: gcortopassi/at/ucdavis.edu (G. Cortopassi). The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Arch Biochem Biophys. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Frataxin protein deficiency causes the neurodegenerative disease Friedreich ataxia. We used inducible siRNA to order the consequences of frataxin deficiency that we and others have previously observed. The earliest consequence of frataxin deficiency was a defect in cytoplasmic iron–sulfur proteins. In the second phase, protein oxidative damage increased, and CuZnSOD was induced, as was the unfolded protein response (UPR), long before any decline in mitochondrial aconitase activity. In the third phase, mitochondrial aconitase activity declined. And in the fourth phase, coincident with the decrease in heme-containing cytochrome c protein, a transcriptional induction of the heme-dependent transcripts ALAS1 and MAOA occurred. These observations suggest that the earliest consequences of frataxin deficiency occur in ISC proteins of the cytoplasm, resulting in oxidative damage and stress and activation of the unfolded protein response which has been associated with neurological disease, and that later consequences involve mitochondrial iron–sulfur cluster deficiency, heme deficiency, and then increased heme biosynthesis. Keywords: Frataxin, RNAi, Iron-sulfur cluster, Redox alterations, Heme pathway, Unfolded protein response Friedreich ataxia (FRDA)1 is the most common recessively inherited ataxia, and is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and increased incidence of diabetes [1–3]. FRDA is caused by a deficiency in frataxin protein due to a GAA repeat expansion in the first intron [4,5]. The residual frataxin level ranges from 5% to 35% of the normal level in patients [5,6]. Frataxin deficiency causes multiple biochemical alterations including: decreased activity of iron–sulfur cluster (ISC) proteins, accumulation of mitochondrial iron, sensitivity to pro-oxidants, altered heme pathway transcripts, and activation of stress pathways [7–12]. However, it is less clear which of these alterations are the primary events and which are secondary in the pathogenesis of Friedreich ataxia. Some animal and cellular models are relevant to the phases of frataxin-deficient cellular pathology. For example, conditional neuronal and cardiac frataxin knockout mice demonstrated that iron accumulation occurred after the onset of cardiac hypertrophy and after ISC protein deficiency, suggesting that an accumulation of mitochondrial iron is not a primary consequence of frataxin deficiency [13]. Frataxin depletion in human HeLa cells by RNAi showed that the activity of ISC enzymes decreased quickly, whereas no alterations in total cellular, mitochondrial, or heme iron were observed [14]. Both of these former studies demonstrate that ISC enzyme defects are the primary consequence of frataxin deficiency and iron accumulations are late consequences. Microarray studies of the earliest consequences of frataxin deficiency in mice suggest alterations of stress and redox pathways [15]. Recent data demonstrate that the mature form of frataxin also exists in the cytosol, and that it physically interacts with ISU1 (the cytosolic isoform of ISC scaffold), suggesting that frataxin is involved in the ISC biosynthesis in the cytosol [16,17]. These data suggest that frataxin may serve important functions in the cytosol as well as the mitochondria. In order to control the onset of frataxin deficiency, and thus study the earliest biochemical consequences at the cellular level, we generated an inducible frataxin knockdown cell model. We observed that cytoplasmic frataxin turns over three times faster than mitochondrial frataxin. The earliest consequences of frataxin deficiency were observed to occur in cytoplasmic ISC proteins and to result in oxidative damage and stress, and trigger the unfolded protein response. In addition, cytochrome c depletion and ALAS1 induction occur only after mitochondrial ISC deficiency. These observations suggest four phases of consequences of frataxin deficiency, an early phase in which only cytoplasmic ISC enzymes are affected, a secondary phase in which protein oxidative damage occurs and triggers the unfolded protein response, a third phase in which mitochondrial aconitase activity declines, and a fourth phase in which a heme abnormality develops, to which the cell attempts to respond by activation of the rate-limiting step of the heme pathway. Experimental procedures Cell lines and cell culture T-Rex-293 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) is a human embryonic kidney cell line that contains the pcDNA6/TR plasmid, stably expressing the tetracycline repressor (TetR). T-Rex-293 Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% tetracycline-free FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT) and antibiotics. Lymphoblasts were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 500 mg/L glutamate, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μg/mL uridine, 100 μM non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen), 20% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin. Vector construction (inducible hFxnRNAi construct) The pSUPERIOR.PURO vector for inducible siRNA expression in mammalian cells was purchased from Oligoengine (Seattle, WA). pSUPERIOR. PURO is a tetracycline-regulated expression vector, in which tetracycline regulation is achieved by the binding of tetracycline to the TetR which derepresses the promoter controlling expression of the shRNA. The shRNA sequence against human frataxin was designed using the software provided by Oligoengine. The template for shRNA expression was obtained by annealing oligonucleotides (GATCCC AGTTCGAAC CAACGTGGCC TTCAAGAGA GGCCACGTTGGTTCGAACT TTTT TC and TCGAGAAAAA AGTTCGAACCAACGTGGCC TCTC TTGAA GGCCACGTTGGTTCGAACT GG). The sense and antisense strands of the 19-nucleotide (nt) target sequence (position 166–184 of the coding sequence) are indicated in italics and are separated by a 9-nt loop sequence (TTCAAGAGA). The pSUPERIOR.PURO vector was digested with BglII and XhoI. The annealed oligonucleotides were ligated into the vector, designated inducible hFxnRNAi construct, and confirmed by sequencing. Generation of stable tetracycline-inducible hFxnRNAi cell line T-Rex-293 cells were transfected with the inducible hFxnRNAi construct using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The empty pSUPERIOR. PURO vector was transfected into the T-Rex-293 and was used as control for the inducible model system. At 24 h after transfection, the cells were split at a 1:10 ratio and grown in medium containing 1.5 μg/mL puromycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 5 μg/mL blasticidin hydrochloride (Invitrogen) for 2 weeks. Single clones were isolated and expanded for an additional 2 months. To determine the efficiency of the inducible RNAi system, frataxin mRNA levels were assayed by real-time qPCR upon induction with tetracycline in hFxnRNAi and control clones. Each transfectant was incubated with and without tetracycline (1 μg/mL) at 37 °C for 48 h. Afterwards, total RNA was isolated and real-time qPCR was performed to examine frataxin mRNA levels. Four hFxnRNAi clones showed >50% reduction of frataxin, whereas frataxin level remained unchanged (data not shown) in control clones after 48 h of exposure to tetracycline (1 μg/mL). Verification of inducible siRNA-mediated suppression of frataxin A dose–response study and a time course study were performed to verify tetracycline-inducible frataxin suppression. The hFxnRNAi transfectant was incubated in medium containing different tetracycline concentrations (i.e., 0, 0.005, 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 μg/mL) for 48 h. Frataxin mRNA levels were assayed by real-time qPCR. The dose–response study showed that the frataxin suppression displayed a tetracycline dose-dependent manner in the hFxnRNAi clone (see Fig. 9
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis Total RNA was extracted and the real-time qPCR was performed as described previously [18]. GAPDH was chosen as a reference gene, and all transcript levels were normalized with GAPDH transcript levels in the same sample. Serial dilutions of cDNA were used for standard curve for each primer pair. The primers of PCR are as follows: Frataxin (290 bp) forward, 5′-ACT AGC AGA GGA AAC GCT GG- 3′, reverse, 5′-AGG CTT TAG TGA GCT CTG CG-3′; GAPDH (215 bp) forward, 5′-CCC CTG GCC AAG GTC ATC CAT G-3′, reverse, 5′-CAG TGA GCT TCC CGT TCA GCT C-3′; MAOA (440 bp) forward, 5′- GGA TTA CTG TGG CTG CAT GAT-3′, reverse, 5′-TCC CGA GAC CAT TTA AGA CCT-3′; ALAS1 (234 bp) forward, 5′-CGT CAA ACT CAT GAG ACA GAT GC-3′, reverse, 5′-TAG TTC ATC ATC TGG GGT GTG TG-3′; ATF4 (377 bp) forward, 5′-AAG CCT AGG TCT CTT AGA TGA TTA CC-3′, reverse, 5′-CAA CCT GGT CGG GTT TTG TTA AAC-3′; CHOP (199 bp) forward, 5′-CAG AAC CAG CAGAGG TCA CA-3′, reverse, 5′-AGC TGT GCC ACT TTC CTT TC- 3′; IRP1 (315 bp) forward, 5′-GCT GGA ATG CCT TAG CAA CC-3′, reverse, 5′-GTG GTG CCT GCT TGT TCA AA-3′; mitochondrial aconitase (379 bp) forward, 5′-CAC TTC CGT GTT CCC TTA CAA-3′, reverse, 5′-CCC ACC TGG AGT GAT GGT GAA CTG-3′; CuZnSOD (206 bp) forward, 5′-CAT GTT GGA GAC TTG GGC AAT-3′, reverse, 5′-ACA CCA CAA GCC AAA CGA CTT-3′. Isolation of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial fractions About 1.2 × 108 cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended with 4 mL mitochondrial isolation buffer (250 mM sucrose, 50 mM Tris–HCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail and 1 mM PMSF, pH 7.4) per gram cell pellet. 0.1 mg/mL digitonin was added and the cell suspension was incubated for 10 min on ice. Homogenization was carried out in a Potter–Elvehjem homogenizer with 15 strokes using a Teflon pestle. The homogenate was then centrifuged (1000g for 10 min at 4 °C) to remove nuclei, unbroken cells and debris. The crude mitochondrial pellet was collected by centrifugation at 12,000g (15 min) in a microfuge and gently rinsed with cold isolation buffer three times. The mitochondrial pellet was resuspended in the mitochondrial isolation buffer and freeze-thawed three times to break the mitochondrial membrane. The supernatant containing cytoplasmic proteins was stored at −80 °C for further investigation. The protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Whole cell extract preparation The cells were harvested and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris– HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/mL each of aprotinin, leupeptin and pepstatin), and incubated on ice for 30 min. Two hundred microliters of lysis buffer was used per T-75 flask. The lysates were centrifuged at 14,000g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were saved as whole cell extracts and stored at −80 °C. Western blot analysis Equal amounts of proteins were resolved on SDS–polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a Mini Trans-Blot cell (Bio-Rad). After blocking with 4% non-fat milk, the membranes were incubated overnight with the following primary antibodies: rabbit antifrataxin; mouse anti-GAPDH; rabbit anti-MnSOD; rabbit anti-CuZn- SOD; rabbit anti-ISU (a kind gift from Drs. Tracey Rouault and Wing Hang Tong); rabbit anti-COXIV; rabbit anti-VDAC; rabbit anti-IRP1 and rabbit anti-mitochondrial aconitase (a kind gift from Dr. Luke Szweda); mouse anti-cytochrome c. Afterwards, the membranes were developed with AP-conjugated secondary antibodies using a chemiluminescent substrate (Bio-Rad). Densitometry was performed for semi-quantification of signals on films on a GS-700 imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad). Aconitase activity assay Aconitase activity was assayed both in the mitochondrial and cytoplasmic fractions with minor modifications to the Bioxytech Aconitase- 340 assay (Oxis Research, Foster City, CA). 0.6 mM MnCl2 was included in the extract preparation buffer and also in the reaction to limit the inactivation of aconitase by
Immunoblot analysis of carbonylated proteins About 2 × 106 cells were harvested and lysed in the lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mMPMSF, 1 μg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin and pepstatin). Fifty millimolar DTT was included in the lysis buffer to prevent the oxidation of proteins that may occur after cell lysis. Oxyblot analysis was performed to detect the carbonyl groups with a commercial kit (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). Briefly, 20 μg protein was derivatized with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) for each sample. Another aliquot with the same amount of protein was added with Derivatization-Control Solution instead of the DNPH solution and used as negative control. Afterwards, the derivative that is produced by reaction with DNPH was immunodetected by an antibody specific to the attached DNP moiety of proteins and was developed with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Spectrophotometric assay of carbonylated proteins The carbonyl groups of oxidized proteins was further quantified spectrophotometrically with a commercial kit (Cayman chemical, Ann Arbor, MI), according to the manual. The absorbance of proteinhydrozone produced by the reaction between DNPH and protein carbonyls was measured at 370 nm. The carbonyl content was calculated as nmol/mg protein. Iron measurements Mitochondrial and whole cell iron concentration were measured by the ferrozine-based colorimetric assay. Results Cytoplasmic frataxin turns over threefold faster than mitochondrial frataxin The time-dependent depletion of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial frataxin pools by siRNA produced upon the tetracycline induction was measured. Total RNA was isolated from hFxnRNAi cells after incubating with or without tetracycline induction for the indicated time. Similarly, mitochondrial and cytoplasmic protein fractions were extracted from these same cells. The half-depletion for frataxin mRNA, which encodes both cytoplasmic and mitochondrial forms, was observed to be 1.5 days (Fig. 1A
In agreement with two recent studies, the frataxin protein we observed in the cytoplasm is the mature form (Fig. 1B Frataxin deficiency affects cytoplasmic aconitase activity much sooner than mitochondrial aconitase activity Frataxin has been proposed to have a primary function in the biosynthesis, protection, or repair of ISCs, and the activity of the aconitase enzyme is often used as a surrogate for ISC status [14,20]. Both cytoplasmic and mitochondrial aconitase activity were measured in hFxnRNAi cells treated with or without tetracycline. Cytoplasmic aconitase activity declined in parallel with cytoplasmic frataxin, beginning at day 2 and before mitochondrial aconitase had begun to significantly decline (Figs. 1A
A decline in mitochondrial aconitase activity was observed at day 7 (Fig. 2A To address the issue of whether frataxin was more important for iron concentration or iron–sulfur cluster functions, cellular and mitochondrial iron content was measured by the ferrozine assay. No differences in iron concentration were observed at day 2, 5, 7 and 9 (data not shown). Thus we observe no effects of frataxin deficiency on iron concentration in this model system. Cytoplasmic ISU levels significantly decline rapidly after frataxin depletion, whereas mitochondrial ISU does not We further examined the time-dependent effects of frataxin deficiency on the ISC assembly scaffold protein ISU. Cytoplasmic ISU (ISU1) protein is extremely important in that it is the scaffold on which most cytoplasmic iron–sulfur clusters are made. We have demonstrated previously that ISU expression is defective in cells from Friedreich’s ataxia patients [18], and we and others have demonstrated an irondependent interaction between frataxin and ISU [21,22]. Cytoplasmic ISU1 responded very quickly to cytoplasmic frataxin deficiency, in parallel with cytoplasmic aconitase, and began to decrease at 2 days, long before frataxin protein was depleted in mitochondria (Figs. 1A
Frataxin deficiency induces transcriptional activators of the unfolded protein response Iron–sulfur clusters are important prosthetic groups, almost always involved in electron transfer. The deficiency of cytoplasmic ISU1, should lead to a decrease in biosynthesis of ISCs, which could either cause an increase in ISC-less apoproteins and lead to more protein unfolding, or defective electron transfer from degraded ISCs and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS). Unfolded proteins induce the unfolded protein response (UPR), which has recently been implicated in multiple neurological diseases [23–28]. We observed increased transcripts for ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4) and its transcriptional targets CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein) at day 4 (Fig. 6
Early induction of cytoplasmic antioxidant and protein oxidative damage upon frataxin depletion The iron–sulfur cluster in aconitase is thought to be among the most sensitive in the cell to redox alterations [29,30]. Frataxin was shown to play a critical role in protecting aconitase from oxidative stress-induced inactivation [20]. These data suggest that one important function of frataxin is to protect ISCs from oxidative stress. Also, damaged iron–sulfur clusters within iron–sulfur proteins may lead to increased reactive oxygen species. We thus asked if the deficiency of frataxin induces antioxidant enzymes that protect against redox alterations, and if deficiency of frataxin causes protein oxidative damage. Cytoplasmic SOD (CuZnSOD) and mitochondrial SOD (MnSOD) are important antioxidant enzymes for the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial compartments, respectively, and so protein levels of CuZnSOD and MnSOD were assayed. CuZnSOD protein levels responded quickly to cytoplasmic frataxin deficiency, simultaneously with the fall in cytoplasmic aconitase and ISU1, and began to increase at day 2 (Figs. 1A
If frataxin deficiency results in oxidative damage to proteins, one measurable oxidative modification of proteins is protein carbonyl groups, which can be visualized by the immunoblot analysis of carbonylated proteins (oxyblot assay) or quantified spectrophotometrically. Both the spectrophotometric assay and densitometry of the oxyblot demonstrated a significant early increase of protein carbonyl content, long before mitochondrial aconitase activity declined (Fig. 5A and B
Effect of frataxin deficiency on the heme pathway and cytochrome c Deficiency of mitochondrial heme has been shown to be one consequence of frataxin deficiency [11,31,32], and this could be a result of decreased ISC enzyme activity in the mitochondria, given that the heme biosynthetic enzymes ferrochelatase and adrenodoxin both require ISC cofactors for activity. We observed previously that mitochondrial cytochrome c protein, heme c, and heme b are deficient in cells from patients with Friedreich’s ataxia, and that cytochrome c protein and heme c decline in parallel [11]. To see if this cell model replicated the results in patients, mitochondrial cytochrome c protein was measured, and we observed that it declined from day 13 onward, suggesting a late frataxin-dependent mitochondrial heme deficiency. If an ISC defect in the mitochondria produced a mitochondrial heme defect, then the cell should sense that defect and respond by overexpressing ALAS1, the first, mitochondrial, rate-limiting and heme-dependent step of the heme biosynthetic pathway. We observed that the mRNA of mitochondrial ALAS1 (Delta-aminolevulinate synthase 1, the house-keeping form) began to increase at day 13, in parallel with the decline in mitochondrial cytochrome c, and after the decline in mitochondrial frataxin and aconitase (Figs. 1A
The mRNA levels of mitochondrial monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) also increased in parallel with ALAS1 at day 13 (Fig. 7A
An observation of the previous work in patient cells was that frataxin deficiency specified both a defect in the heme pathway and also a defect in cytochrome c [11]. In this cell model we observe that the fall in cytochrome c is a late consequence of frataxin inhibition, and parallels the induction of ALAS1 and MAOA. Discussion An inducible model for frataxin deficiency Frataxin deficiency causes multiple biochemical consequences. However, both the sequence of events in FRDA cellular pathophysiology, and their relevance for the disease, are issues of substantial scientific debate. Thus, we generated an inducible model to express similar residual frataxin levels to the patients (5–35%) in an attempt to recapitulate the cellular pathophysiological changes that occur in FRDA patients, and to determine their order. The controlled onset of frataxin deficiency in this model allows a study of the time course of biochemical changes in cells with identical genetic backgrounds. In the course of this study, we observed that the cytoplasmic consequences of frataxin deficiency precede the mitochondrial ones, and so should be considered in the context of pathophysiology. Frataxin occurs in cytosol and turns over more rapidly than in mitochondria Until recently frataxin was thought to reside only in mitochondria. However, a cytoplasmic pool of mature frataxin has been demonstrated in several different cell types including HEK293 [16,17]. We demonstrated that the cytoplasmic frataxin pool responds about threefold more rapidly to siRNA knockdown than the mitochondrial frataxin pool. This suggests that the turnover of the cytoplasmic frataxin protein is about threefold faster than that of the mitochondrial frataxin pool. Furthermore, we demonstrate that while the density of frataxin protein per 10 μg protein is about fivefold lower in cytoplasm than mitochondria, that in aggregate there are more mature frataxin molecules in cytoplasm than mitochondria. Thus, because of their number and relatively rapid turnover, the consequences of frataxin deficiency in cytoplasm should be considered in the pathogenetic mechanism of FRDA. Cytoplasmic frataxin protein, aconitase activity and ISU1 levels decline in parallel long before depletion of mitochondrial frataxin One popular hypothesis for frataxin’s function is that it stimulates ISC biosynthesis, or protects ISCs from oxidative damage [20]. Another role proposed for frataxin is that it is an iron chaperone, and provides iron for ISC assembly and heme biosynthesis [22,31,32,36–38]. Consistent with the former view, we observed that frataxin deficiency caused a rapid decline in cytoplasmic aconitase activity at 2 days, in parallel with cytoplasmic frataxin depletion. There was a rapid decline in mitochondrial aconitase activity at 7 days, but only after mitochondrial frataxin was depleted at 5 days. By contrast, there was no significant alteration in mitochondrial or total cellular iron concentration at 2, 5, 7 and 9 days. Thus the earliest effects we could observe of frataxin deficiency were on ISC proteins, not on iron. These observations were consistent with the finding that frataxin depletion affected both cytoplasmic and mitochondrial aconitase activity [14]. Neither the aconitase mRNA nor protein levels were significantly altered at the time of activity decrease, consistent with the idea that the aconitase activity defect is caused by the defect in the iron–sulfur cofactor. Cytoplasmic ISU (ISU1) protein, the scaffold upon which most cytoplasmic ISCs are made, began to decrease at day 2, in parallel with decreasing cytoplasmic frataxin levels and cytoplasmic aconitase activity, whereas the mitochondrial ISU protein (ISU2) did not show any significant change within the time period specified. We have previously demonstrated that ISU protein is deficient in cells from patients with Friedreich ataxia [18], and Frataxin has also been found to bind ISU [21,22]. ISU1 is a major scaffold on which cytoplasmic iron–sulfur clusters are built. Thus, these results demonstrate that ISU1 deficiency, along with cytosolic aconitase deficiency, are the earliest observed consequences of frataxin deficiency in the cell, and that there is no significant decrease in ISU2 level as a consequence of frataxin deficiency. These data suggest that defects in cytoplasmic ISC biosynthesis may precede other (mitochondrial) problems, and lead to cytoplasmic ISC deficiency and protein damage. Frataxin deficiency induces the unfolded protein response A deficiency of ISU1, which is the earliest cytoplasmic consequence of frataxin deficiency along with the decrease in aconitase activity, should lead to deficiency in the biosynthesis of cytoplasmic ISCs, and more unfolded ISC-dependent apoproteins, which should lead to defects in the folding of ISC proteins. Also, redox alterations (discussed below) triggers UPR [39–41]. We thus investigated if and when the UPR was activated by frataxin deficiency. The UPR transcripts ATF4 and CHOP were induced at 4 days (Fig. 6 The UPR has recently been implicated in two neurological demyelinating diseases, i.e., Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease (PMD) [25] and Childhood Ataxia with Central nervous system Hypomyelinization (CACH) [26]. Unmyelinated axons were observed in a series of necropsied and biopsied FRDA cases [43]. Recently, demyelination has been reported in a mouse model of Friedreich’s ataxia [44]. Thus, the induction of the UPR stress response could contribute to demyelination in Friedreich’s ataxia. CuZnSOD and oxidative damage are induced early, before mitochondrial frataxin is depleted There is debate over whether redox alterations play a role in the pathogenesis of FRDA. Increased oxidative damage was observed in FRDA patients [45,46] and occurs after frataxin disruption in murine hepatocytes or pancreatic cells [47,48], and the antioxidant idebenone is cardioprotective in frataxin knockout mice [49]. However, other studies in the frataxin knockouts show no protection by the MnSOD mimetic (MnTBAP) or CuZnSOD overexpression [42]. We observed that defects in cytoplasmic ISU1 and cytoplasmic aconitase activity are the earliest consequences of frataxin deficiency. Defects in cytoplasmic ISC biosynthesis are expected to lead to deficiencies in cytoplasmic ISC proteins, many or all of which are redox-active. Thus, there are two ways in which cytoplasmic frataxin deficiency may lead to redox alterations. First, if frataxin is involved in ISC biogenesis, then as a consequence of decreased cytoplasmic ISCs, there may be increased ROS generation by redox-active proteins with damaged iron–sulfur clusters. Alternatively, if frataxin’s normal role is to protect ISCs from oxidative damage, and if frataxin is decreased, then the cell may perceive redox alterations as a consequence of ISC defects. Whether the increase in oxidative damage is a direct consequence of an increase in the number of unfolded redox-active apoproteins, or an indirect consequence of cell sensing of decreased ISCs which is interpreted by the cell as the result of an oxidative attack, we observed a strong induction of CuZnSOD protein (but not MnSOD) at a very early time, 2 days. The induction of CuZnSOD is coincident with the decline in cytoplasmic ISU1 protein level and aconitase activity, suggesting that the deficiency in cytoplasmic ISCs caused alterations in redox status. The induction of CuZnSOD at day 2 occurred long before the fall in mitochondrial aconitase activity at day 7, so it cannot be the result of some mitochondrial ISC defect. Consistent with redox status alterations, we observed increased levels of carbonyl-modified proteins as a consequence of frataxin depletion. The formation of carbonyl groups is the most general and widely used biomarker of protein oxidation [50]. Another good indicator of redox alteration is the GSSG/GSH ratio. In an earlier study, we observed that frataxin deficiency results in a higher level of peroxide and a higher GSSG/GSH ratio (decreased GSH and increased GSSG) [18]. It was intriguing that increased CuZnSOD and oxidized proteins were also observed in FRDA mouse models with GAA repeat expansion mutation [44]. Taken together, these data support the idea that defects in cytoplasmic frataxin cause defects in cytoplasmic ISC proteins which triggers redox alterations and CuZnSOD induction, i.e., cytoplasmic frataxin → ISC → ISU1/aconitase → redox alterations → CuZnSOD induction, and also that cytoplasmic frataxin → ISC → ISU1/aconitase → UPR. Thus we infer that frataxin deficiency in the cytoplasm causes decreased cytoplasmic ISC biosynthesis in the first phase, which causes both redox alterations and the unfolded protein response. If induction of the UPR is a root cause of neurodegeneration in FRDA, as it is in CACH and PMD, then treatments which inhibit the UPR may be relevant for FRDA patients. Induction of the heme pathway is a late consequence of frataxin deficiency We showed previously that frataxin deficiency in patient FRDA lymphoblasts decreases mitochondrial hemes c and a and cytochrome c protein [11] patients, and that knockout mice and cell models also have defects in particular heme transcripts. The current cell model recapitulates the heme response that was observed in other models, and shows that this is a late consequence of frataxin deficiency and begins at 13 days, coincident with cytochrome c deficiency. Thus, frataxin deficiency does result in defects in cytochrome c and induce heme pathway transcripts, but much later than the ISC protein defects, which seems more likely to be a consequence of the late ISC deficiency in the mitochondria, rather than the early depletion of ISCs in the cytoplasm. In contrast to the early changes in cytoplasmic frataxin, cytoplasmic ISCs, and cytoplasmic UPR and redox alterations, the decline in mitochondrial aconitase was quite late, and began at 7 days. Mitochondrial heme synthesis includes two ISC enzymes, ferrochelatase and adrenodoxin, and frataxin has been demonstrated to bind to ferrochelatase [32]. Thus it may be that the later iron– sulfur cluster defect in the mitochondria causes the defect in heme biosynthesis, which the cell tries to overcome by inducing ALAS1 at day 13. ALAS1 regulates two pathways, the heme biosynthetic pathway, and a ‘shunt’ pathway that produces D-lactate [33], and one step on the shunt pathway is the conversion of aminoacetone to methyglyoxal by monoamine oxidase. As expected, the rise in ALAS1 transcript was paralleled by the rise in MAOA transcript. High MAOA activity is associated with schizophrenia, psychosis and bipolar disorders, and MAOA inhibitors have been used as antidepressants [51]. Friedreich ataxia has been reported to be associated with a number of psychiatric manifestations including cognitive impairment, depression, emotional lability and schizophrenia-like psychosis [52–54]. The association of neuropsychiatric signs with porphyrias has also been long-recognized [55,56], but never understood, and we propose that defects in the heme pathway feed back to stimulate ALAS1, (and thus necessarily MAOA through the heme shunt) to cause the neuropsychiatric symptoms. The parallel induction of ALAS1 and MAOA provides a novel hypothesis for the acknowledged fact that porphyrias are associated with psychiatric symptoms, and has the potential to explain some psychiatric symptoms in FRDA patients. Since approved, non-toxic pharmacological MAOA inhibitors exist, FRDA patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms may benefit from their use. Summary and prospects The data presented herein evaluate the time- and compartment- dependent consequences of frataxin deficiency. The data demonstrate that cytoplasmic frataxin turns over threefold faster than mitochondrial frataxin, and that the earliest consequences of frataxin deficiency are cytoplasmic. The consequences of cytoplasmic frataxin deficiency include defects in ISU1 and aconitase, which apparently cause induction of CuZnSOD and protein oxidative damage and the induction of the unfolded protein response, whose persistent induction has been demonstrated to cause other glial neurological diseases. If UPR induction is the cause of neurodegeneration and diabetes in FRDA, inhibition of UPR could be of benefit to FRDA patients. Later, the mitochondrial frataxin deficiency caused a deficiency in mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster enzymes, and later still a coincident deficiency in heme-containing cytochrome c, and induction of ALAS1. Taken together these data suggest a model for FRDA in that cytoplasmic frataxin defects are primary, i.e., cytoplasmic frataxin → cytoplasmic ISCs → redox alterations and UPR → negative consequences. A second observation is that frataxin deficiency in the mitochondria → ISC defects → mitochondrial heme defects→ heme induction. The parallel induction of MAOA with ALAS1 suggests a biochemical basis for psychiatric symptoms in FRDA patients in particular and the porphyrias in general, and for those patients, MAOA-inhibitors may be of benefit. Acknowledgments We thank R. Schoenfeld, Y. Shan and M. Britton for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by USPHS Grants AG11967, AG16719, EY12245 and AG23311. Abbreviations used References 1. Harding AE. The Hereditary Ataxias and Related Disorders. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1984. 2. Harding AE. The inherited ataxias. Adv Neurol. 1988;48:37–46. [PubMed] 3. Johnson WG. Friedreich ataxia. Clin Neurosci. 1995;3:33–38. [PubMed] 4. Campuzano V, Montermini L, Molto MD, Pianese L, Cossee M, Cavalcanti F, Monros E, Rodius F, Duclos F, Monticelli A, Zara F, Canizares J, Koutnikova H, Bidichandani SI, Gellera C, Brice A, Trouillas P, De Michele G, Filla A, De Frutos R, Palau F, Patel PI, Di Donato S, Mandel JL, Cocozza S, Koenig M, Pandolfo M. Friedreich’s ataxia: autosomal recessive disease caused by an intronic GAA triplet repeat expansion. Science. 1996;271:1423–1427. [PubMed] 5. Campuzano V, Montermini L, Lutz Y, Cova L, Hindelang C, Jiralerspong S, Trottier Y, Kish SJ, Faucheux B, Trouillas P, Authier FJ, Durr A, Mandel JL, Vescovi A, Pandolfo M, Koenig M. Frataxin is reduced in Friedreich ataxia patients and is associated with mitochondrial membranes. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:1771–1780. [PubMed] 6. Pianese L, Turano M, Lo Casale MS, De Biase I, Giacchetti M, Monticelli A, Criscuolo C, Filla A, Cocozza S. Real time PCR quantification of frataxin mRNA in the peripheral blood leucocytes of Friedreich ataxia patients and carriers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:1061–1063. [PubMed] 7. Foury F, Cazzalini O. Deletion of the yeast homologue of the human gene associated with Friedreich’s ataxia elicits iron accumulation in mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1997;411:373–377. [PubMed] 8. Wilson RB, Roof DM. Respiratory deficiency due to loss of mitochondrial DNA in yeast lacking the frataxin homologue. Nat Genet. 1997;16:352–357. [PubMed] 9. Rotig A, de Lonlay P, Chretien D, Foury F, Koenig M, Sidi D, Munnich A, Rustin P. Aconitase and mitochondrial iron–sulphur protein deficiency in Friedreich ataxia. Nat Genet. 1997;17:215–217. [PubMed] 10. Lamarche DSJB, Cote M, Lemieux B. Cardiac iron deposits in Friedreich’s ataxia. In: Lechtenberg R, editor. Handbook of Cerebellar Diseases. Marcel Dekker; 1993. pp. 453–458. 11. Schoenfeld RA, Napoli E, Wong A, Zhan S, Reutenauer L, Morin D, Buckpitt AR, Taroni F, Lonnerdal B, Ristow M, Puccio H, Cortopassi GA. Frataxin deficiency alters heme pathway transcripts and decreases mitochondrial heme metabolites in mammalian cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3787–3799. [PubMed] 12. Pianese L, Busino L, De Biase I, De Cristofaro T, Lo Casale MS, Giuliano P, Monticelli A, Turano M, Criscuolo C, Filla A, Varrone S, Cocozza S. Up-regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway in Friedreich’s ataxia cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2989–2996. [PubMed] 13. Puccio H, Simon D, Cossee M, Criqui-Filipe P, Tiziano F, Melki J, Hindelang C, Matyas R, Rustin P, Koenig M. Mouse models for Friedreich ataxia exhibit cardiomyopathy, sensory nerve defect and Fe–S enzyme deficiency followed by intramitochondrial iron deposits. Nat Genet. 2001;27:181–186. [PubMed] 14. Stehling O, Elsasser HP, Bruckel B, Muhlenho U, Lill R. Iron– sulfur protein maturation in human cells: evidence for a function of frataxin. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:3007–3015. [PubMed] 15. Coppola G, Choi SH, Santos MM, Miranda CJ, Tentler D, Wexler EM, Pandolfo M, Geschwind DH. Gene expression profiling in frataxin deficient mice: microarray evidence for significant expression changes without detectable neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;22:302–311. [PubMed] 16. Acquaviva F, De Biase I, Nezi L, Ruggiero G, Tatangelo F, Pisano C, Monticelli A, Garbi C, Acquaviva AM, Cocozza S. Extramitochondrial localisation of frataxin and its association with IscU1 during enterocyte-like differentiation of the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line Caco-2. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3917–3924. [PubMed] 17. Condo I, Ventura N, Malisan F, Tomassini B, Testi R. A pool of extramitochondrial frataxin that promotes cell survival. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:16750–16756. [PubMed] 18. Tan G, Napoli E, Taroni F, Cortopassi G. Decreased expression of genes involved in sulfur amino acid metabolism in frataxin-deficient cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1699–1711. [PubMed] 19. Gardner PR, Fridovich I. Superoxide sensitivity of the Escherichia coli aconitase. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:19328–19333. [PubMed] 20. Bulteau AL, O’Neill HA, Kennedy MC, Ikeda-Saito M, Isaya G, Szweda LI. Frataxin acts as an iron chaperone protein to modulate mitochondrial aconitase activity. Science. 2004;305:242– 245. [PubMed] 21. Napoli E, Taroni F, Cortopassi GA. Frataxin, iron–sulfur clusters, heme, ROS, and aging. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:506–516. [PubMed] 22. Yoon T, Cowan JA. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis. Characterization of frataxin as an iron donor for assembly of [2Fe–2S] clusters in ISU-type proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:6078–6084. [PubMed] 23. Hoozemans JJ, Veerhuis R, Van Haastert ES, Rozemuller JM, Baas F, Eikelenboom P, Scheper W. The unfolded protein response is activated in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2005;110:165–172. [PubMed] 24. Ryu EJ, Harding HP, Angelastro JM, Vitolo OV, Ron D, Greene LA. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in cellular models of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2002;22:10690–10698. [PubMed] 25. Southwood CM, Garbern J, Jiang W, Gow A. The unfolded protein response modulates disease severity in Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease. Neuron. 2002;36:585–596. [PubMed] 26. Kantor L, Harding HP, Ron D, Schiffmann R, Kaneski CR, Kimball SR, Elroy-Stein O. Heightened stress response in primary fibroblasts expressing mutant eIF2B genes from CACH/VWM leukodystrophy patients. Hum Genet. 2005;118:99–106. [PubMed] 27. Vlug AS, Teuling E, Haasdijk ED, French P, Hoogenraad CC, Jaarsma D. ATF3 expression precedes death of spinal motoneurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-SOD1 transgenic mice and correlates with c-Jun phosphorylation, CHOP expression, somato-dendritic ubiquitination and Golgi fragmentation. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1881–1894. [PubMed] 28. Cortopassi G, Danielson S, Alemi M, Zhan SS, Tong W, Carelli V, Martinuzzi A, Marzuki S, Majamaa K, Wong A. Mitochondrial disease activates transcripts of the unfolded protein response and cell cycle and inhibits vesicular secretion and oligodendrocyte- specific transcripts. Mitochondrion. 2006;6:161–175. [PubMed] 29. Djaman O, Outten FW, Imlay JA. Repair of oxidized iron–sulfur clusters in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:44590–44599. [PubMed] 30. Gardner PR. Aconitase: sensitive target and measure of superoxide. Methods Enzymol. 2002;349:9–23. [PubMed] 31. Lesuisse E, Santos R, Matzanke BF, Knight SA, Camadro JM, Dancis A. Iron use for haeme synthesis is under control of the yeast frataxin homologue (Yfh1). Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:879–889. [PubMed] 32. Yoon T, Cowan JA. Frataxin-mediated iron delivery to ferrochelatase in the final step of heme biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:25943–25946. [PubMed] 33. Urata G, Granick S. Biosynthesis of alpha-aminoketones and the metabolism of aminoacetone. J Biol Chem. 1963;238:811–820. [PubMed] 34. Fubara B, Eckenrode F, Tressel T, Davis L. Purification and properties of aminoacetone synthetase from beef liver mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:12189–12196. [PubMed] 35. Tong H, Davis L. 2-Amino-3-ketobutyrate-CoA ligase from beef liver mitochondria. Purification and partial sequence. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:4057–4064. [PubMed] 36. Muhlenho U, Richhardt N, Ristow M, Kispal G, Lill R. The yeast frataxin homolog Yfh1p plays a specific role in the maturation of cellular Fe/S proteins. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2025–2036. [PubMed] 37. Cavadini P, O’Neill HA, Benada O, Isaya G. Assembly and ironbinding properties of human frataxin, the protein deficient in Friedreich ataxia. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:217–227. [PubMed] 38. Park S, Gakh O, O’Neill HA, Mangravita A, Nichol H, Ferreira GC, Isaya G. Yeast frataxin sequentially chaperones and stores iron by coupling protein assembly with iron oxidation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:31340–31351. [PubMed] 39. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Novoa I, Lu PD, Calfon M, Sadri N, Yun C, Popko B, Paules R, Stojdl DF, Bell JC, Hettmann T, Leiden JM, Ron D. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell. 2003;11:619–633. [PubMed] 40. Xue X, Piao JH, Nakajima A, Sakon-Komazawa S, Kojima Y, Mori K, Yagita H, Okumura K, Harding H, Nakano H. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) induces the unfolded protein response (UPR) in a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent fashion, and the UPR counteracts ROS accumulation by TNFalpha. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33917–33925. [PubMed] 41. Hayashi T, Saito A, Okuno S, Ferrand-Drake M, Dodd RL, Chan PH. Damage to the endoplasmic reticulum and activation of apoptotic machinery by oxidative stress in ischemic neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:41–53. [PubMed] 42. Seznec H, Simon D, Bouton C, Reutenauer L, Hertzog A, Golik P, Procaccio V, Patel M, Drapier JC, Koenig M, Puccio H. Friedreich ataxia: the oxidative stress paradox. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:463–474. [PubMed] 43. Hughes JT, Brownell B, Hewer RL. The peripheral sensory pathway in Friedreich’s ataxia. An examination by light and electron microscopy of the posterior nerve roots, posterior root ganglia, and peripheral sensory nerves in cases of Friedreich’s ataxia. Brain. 1968;91:803–818. [PubMed] 44. Al-Mahdawi S, Pinto RM, Varshney D, Lawrence L, Lowrie MB, Hughes S, Webster Z, Blake J, Cooper JM, King R, Pook MA. GAA repeat expansion mutation mouse models of Friedreich ataxia exhibit oxidative stress leading to progressive neuronal and cardiac pathology. Genomics. 2006;88:580–590. [PubMed] 45. Schulz JB, Dehmer T, Schols L, Mende H, Hardt C, Vorgerd M, Burk K, Matson W, Dichgans J, Beal MF, Bogdanov MB. Oxidative stress in patients with Friedreich ataxia. Neurology. 2000;55:1719–1721. [PubMed] 46. Emond M, Lepage G, Vanasse M, Pandolfo M. Increased levels of plasma malondialdehyde in Friedreich ataxia. Neurology. 2000;55:1752–1753. [PubMed] 47. Thierbach R, Schulz TJ, Isken F, Voigt A, Mietzner B, Drewes G, von Kleist-Retzow JC, Wiesner RJ, Magnuson MA, Puccio H, Pfeiffer AF, Steinberg P, Ristow M. Targeted disruption of hepatic frataxin expression causes impaired mitochondrial function, decreased life span and tumor growth in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3857–3864. [PubMed] 48. Ristow M, Mulder H, Pomplun D, Schulz TJ, Muller-Schmehl K, Krause A, Fex M, Puccio H, Muller J, Isken F, Spranger J, Muller-Wieland D, Magnuson MA, Mohlig M, Koenig M, Pfeiffer AF. Frataxin deficiency in pancreatic islets causes diabetes due to loss of beta cell mass. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:527–534. [PubMed] 49. Seznec H, Simon D, Monassier L, Criqui-Filipe P, Gansmuller A, Rustin P, Koenig M, Puccio H. Idebenone delays the onset of cardiac functional alteration without correction of Fe–S enzymes deficit in a mouse model for Friedreich ataxia. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1017–1024. [PubMed] 50. Stadtman ER, Oliver CN. Metal-catalyzed oxidation of proteins. Physiological consequences. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:2005–2008. [PubMed] 51. Amrein R, Martin JR, Cameron AM. Moclobemide in patients with dementia and depression. Adv Neurol. 1999;80:509–519. [PubMed] 52. Chan YC. Aripiprazole treatment for psychosis associated with Friedreich’s ataxia. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27:372. [PubMed] 53. Lishman WA. Organic psychiatry, the psychological consequences of cerebral disorder. Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford: 1998. 54. Singh G, Binstadt BA, Black DF, Corr AP, Rummans TA. Electroconvulsive therapy and Friedreich’s ataxia. J Ect. 2001;17:53–54. [PubMed] 55. Crimlisk HL. The little imitator—porphyria: a neuropsychiatric disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62:319–328. [PubMed] 56. Massey EW. Neuropsychiatric manifestations of porphyria. J Clin Psychiatry. 1980;41:208–213. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Clin Neurosci. 1995; 3(1):33-8.
[Clin Neurosci. 1995]Science. 1996 Mar 8; 271(5254):1423-7.
[Science. 1996]Hum Mol Genet. 1997 Oct; 6(11):1771-80.
[Hum Mol Genet. 1997]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jul; 75(7):1061-3.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004]FEBS Lett. 1997 Jul 14; 411(2-3):373-7.
[FEBS Lett. 1997]Nat Genet. 2001 Feb; 27(2):181-6.
[Nat Genet. 2001]Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Dec 1; 13(23):3007-15.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2004]Neurobiol Dis. 2006 May; 22(2):302-11.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2006]J Cell Sci. 2005 Sep 1; 118(Pt 17):3917-24.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 16; 281(24):16750-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jul 15; 12(14):1699-711.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 15; 266(29):19328-33.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Dec 1; 13(23):3007-15.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2004]Science. 2004 Jul 9; 305(5681):242-5.
[Science. 2004]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jul 15; 12(14):1699-711.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006 Mar-Apr; 8(3-4):506-16.
[Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006]J Am Chem Soc. 2003 May 21; 125(20):6078-84.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2003]Acta Neuropathol. 2005 Aug; 110(2):165-72.
[Acta Neuropathol. 2005]Mitochondrion. 2006 Aug; 6(4):161-75.
[Mitochondrion. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 22; 279(43):44590-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Methods Enzymol. 2002; 349():9-23.
[Methods Enzymol. 2002]Science. 2004 Jul 9; 305(5681):242-5.
[Science. 2004]Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Dec 15; 14(24):3787-99.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2005]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Apr 15; 12(8):879-89.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 18; 279(25):25943-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1963 Feb; 238():811-20.
[J Biol Chem. 1963]J Biol Chem. 1986 Sep 15; 261(26):12189-96.
[J Biol Chem. 1986]J Biol Chem. 1994 Feb 11; 269(6):4057-64.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Dec 15; 14(24):3787-99.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2005]J Cell Sci. 2005 Sep 1; 118(Pt 17):3917-24.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 16; 281(24):16750-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Science. 2004 Jul 9; 305(5681):242-5.
[Science. 2004]J Am Chem Soc. 2003 May 21; 125(20):6078-84.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2003]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Apr 15; 12(8):879-89.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 18; 279(25):25943-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Aug 15; 11(17):2025-36.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2002]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jul 15; 12(14):1699-711.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006 Mar-Apr; 8(3-4):506-16.
[Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006]J Am Chem Soc. 2003 May 21; 125(20):6078-84.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2003]Mol Cell. 2003 Mar; 11(3):619-33.
[Mol Cell. 2003]J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005 Jan; 25(1):41-53.
[J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005]Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Feb 15; 14(4):463-74.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2005]Neuron. 2002 Nov 14; 36(4):585-96.
[Neuron. 2002]Hum Genet. 2005 Oct; 118(1):99-106.
[Hum Genet. 2005]Brain. 1968; 91(4):803-18.
[Brain. 1968]Genomics. 2006 Nov; 88(5):580-90.
[Genomics. 2006]Neurology. 2000 Dec 12; 55(11):1719-21.
[Neurology. 2000]Neurology. 2000 Dec 12; 55(11):1752-3.
[Neurology. 2000]Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Dec 15; 14(24):3857-64.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2005]J Clin Invest. 2003 Aug; 112(4):527-34.
[J Clin Invest. 2003]Hum Mol Genet. 2004 May 15; 13(10):1017-24.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 5; 266(4):2005-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jul 15; 12(14):1699-711.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]Genomics. 2006 Nov; 88(5):580-90.
[Genomics. 2006]Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Dec 15; 14(24):3787-99.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 18; 279(25):25943-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1963 Feb; 238():811-20.
[J Biol Chem. 1963]Adv Neurol. 1999; 80():509-19.
[Adv Neurol. 1999]Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005 Sep-Oct; 27(5):372.
[Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005]J ECT. 2001 Mar; 17(1):53-4.
[J ECT. 2001]J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Apr; 62(4):319-28.
[J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997]