![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30-Dependent Protein Kinase A Pathway Is Critical in Nongenomic Effects of Estrogen in Attenuating Liver Injury after Trauma-Hemorrhage From the Center for Surgical Research and Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Accepted November 30, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Although nongenomic effects of 17β-estradiol (E2) are mediated via the estrogen receptor α (ER-α), the existence of another novel ER, G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30), has been suggested as a candidate for triggering a broad range of E2-mediated signaling. GPR30 also acts independently of the ER to promote activation of the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway, which protects cells from apoptosis through Bcl-2. In this study, we examined whether the salutary effects of E2 in attenuating hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage are mediated via GPR30- or ER-α-regulated activation of PKA-dependent signaling. At 2 hours after trauma-hemorrhage, administration of E2-conjugated to bovine serum albumin (E2-BSA, membrane impermeable) or E2 induced the up-regulation of ER-α and GPR30 and attenuated hepatic injury. This was accompanied by increases in PKA activity and Bcl-2 expression. Inhibition of PKA in E2-BSA-treated trauma-hemorrhage rats by PKA inhibitor H89 prevented the E2-BSA attenuation of hepatic injury. Isolated hepatocytes were transfected with small interfering RNA to suppress GPR30 or ER. We found that suppression of GPR30 but not ER-α prevented E2-BSA- or E2-induced PKA activation and Bcl-2 expression. These results suggest that the nongenomic salutary effect of E2 in reducing hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated through the PKA-dependent pathway via GPR30 but not ER-α. Despite numerous advances in intensive care medicine, sepsis and organ dysfunction remain the major causes of death after trauma.1,2,3,4,5 Previous studies have shown that administration of 17β-estradiol (E2) after trauma-hemorrhage improved hepatic function.6,7,8 This effect was suggested to be regulated by two different mechanisms, genomic and nongenomic. The ability of E2 conjugated to bovine serum albumin (E2-BSA, putatively a membrane-impermeable compound) to mimic the effects of E2 have been used to distinguish nongenomic from genomic events.9,10,11 Studies have reported that nongenomic effects occur through estrogen receptors (ER-α and ER-β) targeted to the plasma membrane9 or through a recently described novel membrane-associated ER.12,13 ER-α has been demonstrated to be predominantly present in rat liver.14 Our recent study has also shown that ER-α but not ER-β mediated E2-attenuated hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage.15 Nonetheless, whether this beneficial effect of E2 in attenuating liver injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated via the novel membrane-associated ER or classic ER-α remains unknown. G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) is activated by E2 and acts independently of the ER to promote activation of the adenylyl cyclase/cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) pathway.16,17 PKA-dependent signaling mediates anti-apoptotic effects after ischemic liver injury18 and regulates cell survival through the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2.19 In view of this, we hypothesized that the salutary effect of the nongenomic pathway of E2 on hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated through the PKA-dependent Bcl-2 pathway via up-regulation of GPR30 or ER-α. Plasma α-glutathione S-transferase (α-GST) is a more sensitive and specific marker of hepatocellular damage than is aminotransferase activity and correlates better with hepatic histology.20,21,22 α-GST has also been advocated as a superior maker of hepatocellular damage compared with the aminotransferase or bilirubin concentration in clinical patients.23 In this study, we examined the effects of E2-BSA and E2 after trauma-hemorrhage on α-GST levels, GPR30 and ER-α levels, PKA activity, and Bcl-2 levels in the liver. A group of E2-BSA-treated trauma-hemorrhage rats was co-treated with the PKA inhibitor H89 to determine the role of PKA in nongenomic effects of E2 on protection against hepatic injury. Moreover, inhibition of GPR30 or ER-α by transfection of small interfering RNA (siRNA) in isolated hepatocytes was performed to determine whether GPR30 or ER-α is critical in E2-mediated activation of the PKA pathway. Materials and Methods Rat Trauma-Hemorrhagic Shock Model Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were fasted overnight but were allowed free access to water before the experiments. Trauma-hemorrhage and resuscitation was then performed as described previously.24 In brief, rats were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation, and a 5-cm midline laparotomy was performed to induce soft-tissue trauma. The abdominal wound was then closed in layers, and polyethylene (PE-50; Becton Dickinson & Co., Sparks, MD) catheters were placed in both femoral arteries and the right femoral vein, subsequently tunneled through the dorsal skin, and the incision sites were then closed. The rats were then placed into a Plexiglas chamber (21 × 9 × 5 cm) in a prone position and allowed to awaken, after which they were bled rapidly within 10 minutes to a mean arterial pressure of 35 to 40 mm Hg. This level of hypotension was maintained until the animals could no longer maintain a mean arterial pressure of 35 mm Hg unless some fluid in the form of Ringer’s lactate solution was administered. This time was defined as maximal bleed-out. After the maximal bleed-out, mean arterial pressure was maintained between 35 and 40 mm Hg until 40% of the maximal bleed-out volume was returned in the form of Ringer’s lactate solution (~90 minutes from the onset of bleeding). The rats were then resuscitated with four times the volume of maximal bleed-out with Ringer’s lactate for 60 minutes. After resuscitation, the catheters were removed; the incisions were flushed with lidocaine and were closed with sutures. Sham-operated animals underwent all surgical procedures, but neither hemorrhage nor resuscitation was performed. The animals were sacrificed at 2 hours after the end of resuscitation or sham operation. In the treatment group, E2-BSA (equivalent to 1 mg/kg E2; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), E2 (1 mg/kg; Sigma), or vehicle (BSA) was administered intravenously during resuscitation. In another group, E2-BSA was administrated along with 0.4 mg/kg PKA antagonist H89 (10 minutes before E2-BSA, subcutaneously; Sigma) or H89 alone. This dosage of H-89 has been shown to be capable of reducing the myocardial PKA activity by ~55% in vivo.25 All experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The present study used measurement at a single time point, ie, at 2 hours after treatment, and thus it remains unclear whether the salutary effects of E2 in attenuating hepatic injury are sustained for longer periods of time, ie, 24 hours after treatment. In this regard, our previous studies have shown that if improvement in cell and organ functions by any pharmacological agent is evident early after treatment, those salutary effects are sustained for prolonged intervals, and they also improve the survival of animals.26,27 Thus, although a time point other than 2 hours was not examined in this study, based on our previous studies,26,27 it would seem that the salutary effects of E2 would be evident even if one measured those effects at another time point after trauma-hemorrhage and resuscitation. Measurement of Hepatic Injury At 2 hours after trauma-hemorrhage or sham operation, blood samples with heparin were obtained and plasma was separated by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 minutes), immediately frozen, and stored at −80°C. Hepatic injury was determined by measuring plasma levels of α-GST using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biotrin International Ltd., Dublin, UK). Western Blot Analysis Protein aliquots were used to determine protein concentration (Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Samples were mixed with 4× lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer and were electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred electrophoretically onto nitrocellulose paper. The membranes were immunoblotted with anti-rabbit GPR30 (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA), anti-rabbit ER-α (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY), anti-mouse Bcl-2 (Transduction Laboratory, Lexington, KY), and anti-mouse GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Abcam Inc.) antibodies. This was followed by the addition of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody. After the final wash, membranes were probed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) and autoradiographed. Measurement of PKA Activity Liver tissues or hepatocytes were lysed by probe sonication for 10 seconds. The sample (10 μg of total proteins) was then assayed immediately, and PKA activity was measured using fluorescent-labeled kemptide28 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pep Tag assay; Promega, Madison, WI). Phosphorylated kemptide was separated from unphosphorylated substrate by agarose gel electrophoresis. In this assay, enzyme-induced phosphorylation is assessed after electrophoretic separation on agarose gels of the phosphorylated peptide from the nonphosphorylated peptide. Both forms of the peptide were visualized with UV light. Preparation of Hepatocytes Normal rat hepatocytes were isolated as previously described.29 In brief, the portal vein was catheterized with an 18-gauge needle, and the liver was perfused with Hanks’ balanced salt solution without calcium and magnesium (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) at 37°C and 40 ml/minute for 5 minutes, which was immediately followed by perfusion with 0.04% collagenase IV (Sigma) in Hanks’ balanced salt solution containing 1.25 mmol/L CaCl2 at 37°C and 14 ml/minute for 5 minutes. The liver was then removed and transferred to a Petri dish containing the above-mentioned collagenase IV solution. The liver was minced, incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C, and passed through a sterile mesh stainless steel screen into a beaker containing 10 ml of ice-cold complete WEM (William’s E medium, 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 0.1 mg of streptomycin/ml, and 100 U of penicillin/ml) (Life Technologies, Inc.). The cell suspension was washed two times by centrifugation at 50 × g for 3 minutes at 4°C in complete WEM to remove cell debris and nonparenchymal liver cells. The residual cell suspension was washed twice by centrifugation at 800 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C in complete WEM. The final cell pellet was resuspended in complete WEM and plated in a 0.01% collagen I (Sigma)-coated 60-mm plate at a cell density of 2 × 106 cells/ml. After 3 hours of incubation (37°C, 95% humidity, and 5% CO2), nonadherent cells were removed, and medium was changed to OPTI-MEM medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for siRNA transfection. siRNA Synthesis and Transfection Templates for siRNA synthesis were designed on the basis of the GPR30 and ER-α sequences such that the total length was 21 bases, which comprised the 19 nucleotides after an AA doublet, and the relative %GC of the template was 35 to 55%. The sequences of GPR30 used were anti-sense 5′-AACATGTACAGCAGCGTCTTCCCTGTCTC-3′ and sense 5′-AAGAAGACGCTGCTGTACATGCCTGTCTC-3′. The sequences of ER-α used were anti-sense 5′-AAGCTCCTGTTTGCTCCTAACCCTGTCTC-3′ and sense 5′-AAGTTAGGAGCAAACAGGAGCCCTGT-CTC-3′. These target sequences were selected by following the Tuschl method.30 The specificity of each siRNA sequence was checked by BLAST search. Synthesis was performed using the Ambion Silencer siRNA Construction Kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX). After synthesis, sense and anti-sense oligos were annealed to generate siRNAs. Transfection of 200 nmol/L siRNA in OPTI-MEM medium containing oligofectamine was added into the cells. After 6 hours of incubation, the siRNA/oligofectamine mixtures were replaced by phenol red-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 0.1 mg of streptomycin/ml, 100 U of penicillin/ml, and 10% CD-FBS (charcoal-dextran stripping; Hyclone, Logan, UT). Twenty-four hours after the transfection, cells were treated with either E2-BSA (10 nmol/L E2), E2 (10 nmol/L), or vehicle (BSA). The expression levels of the mRNA and protein of the target molecule were examined at 48 hours after transfection. Statistical Analysis All data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were used for the comparison among groups. Paired comparisons were performed using the one-tailed Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Results Effect of E2-BSA or E2 on Plasma α-GST Levels As shown in Table 1, no significant difference in plasma α-GST levels was observed between vehicle- and E2-BSA-treated sham groups. Trauma-hemorrhage increased (P < 0.05) plasma α-GST levels greater than 20-fold. E2-BSA or E2 treatment attenuated the trauma-hemorrhage-induced increase in plasma α-GST. The levels in E2-BSA-treated rats were similar to those observed in E2-treated animals after trauma-hemorrhage.
Effect of E2-BSA or E2 on GPR30 and ER-α Protein Levels GPR30 (Figure 1)
Effect of E2-BSA or E2 on PKA Activity The result showed that there was no difference in PKA activity (phosphorylated band) between vehicle- and E2-BSA-treated sham groups (Figure 3)
Effect of E2-BSA or E2 on Bcl-2 Protein Levels There was no significant difference in Bcl-2 levels between vehicle and E2-BSA-treated sham groups (Figure 4)
Effect of PKA Inhibitor H89 on Plasma α-GST Levels To evaluate whether the nongenomic effect of E2 in attenuating hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated via activation of PKA, a group of E2-BSA-treated trauma-hemorrhage rats was pretreated with the PKA inhibitor H89. As shown in Figure 5
Suppression of GPR30 or ER-α Expression by Transfection with GPR30 or ER-α siRNA To differentiate whether the salutary effect of E2 in attenuating hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated by GPR30 or ER-α, the expression of GPR30 or ER-α was silenced by interfering RNA in hepatocytes isolated from normal rats. Expressions of GPR30 mRNA (Figure 6A)
Suppression of GPR30 but Not ER-α Prevented E2-BSA or E2-Up-Regulated PKA Activity and Bcl-2 Protein Levels Suppression of GPR30 by transfection with GPR30 siRNA decreased (P < 0.05) PKA activity (Figure 8A)
Discussion The findings of this study reveal that plasma α-GST levels were markedly increased, and PKA activity and Bcl-2 levels were significantly decreased at 2 hours after trauma-hemorrhage. Administration of E2-BSA or E2 after trauma-hemorrhage decreased plasma α-GST levels and induced the increase in GPR30 and ER-α levels that was accompanied by the normalization of PKA activity and Bcl-2 levels. Inhibition of PKA in E2-BSA-treated trauma-hemorrhage rats abrogated the beneficial effect of E2-BSA in attenuating hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage. Furthermore, suppression of GPR30 by transfection with GPR30 siRNA prevented E2-BSA- or E2-up-regulated PKA activity and Bcl-2 levels, whereas suppression of ER-α did not affect PKA activity in vitro. These in vivo and in vitro results collectively suggest that the salutary effect of the nongenomic pathway of E2 on hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated through PKA activation via GPR30 but not ER-α (Figure 9)
It has been reported that E2 acts through soluble intracellular receptors. Once activated, these receptors translocate to the nucleus, where they function as ligand-dependent transcription factors.31 This mode of action of two such estrogen-binding receptors, ER-α and ER-β, is well understood.32,33,34 However, the existence of functional ER in the plasma membrane has also been described.12,35 It has been suggested that such membrane receptors mediate rapid nongenomic signaling events, widely observed after stimulation of cells and tissues with E2, including the generation of second messengers as well as the activation of receptor tyrosine kinase and protein-lipid kinase pathways.35,36,37 Novel receptors and novel forms of ER have been postulated to mediate many of these signal transduction events.35 We have previously found that the expression of ER-α is predominant in the liver and that treatment of ER-α but not ER-β agonist attenuated hepatic injury and decreased neutrophil infiltration in the liver after trauma-hemorrhage.15,38 However, whether the salutary effect of the nongenomic pathway of E2 on hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated via a novel estrogen-associated receptor or the traditional ER-α remains unknown. The membrane-located GPR30, an alternative to the classic ERs, is involved in the rapid nongenomic estrogen-mediated signaling through direct binding of E2.12 It has been reported that E2 activates adenylate cyclase and induces cAMP/PKA signaling pathway via GPR30 in human keratinocytes39 and breast cancer cells.40 The PKA-dependent signaling pathway plays a key role in the development of hepatic tolerance to hypoxia/reperfusion41 and mediates anti-apoptotic effects after ischemic liver injury.18 Moreover, PKA can phosphorylate the prosurvival transcription factor CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein).19 This consequently induces Bcl-2 expression and apoptosis resistance in a variety of cell types.19,42,43,44 E2 has also been reported to induce Bcl-2 transcription via cAMP signaling in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.45 In addition, inhibition of GPR30 suppressed the E2-induced increase in cAMP signaling.46 The present study demonstrated that administration of E2-BSA or E2 after trauma-hemorrhage attenuated hepatic injury and up-regulated GPR30 and ER-α levels that was accompanied by normalization of downstream signaling of PKA and Bcl-2. These results indicate that administration of E2-BSA and E2 after trauma-hemorrhage are equally effective and suggest that salutary effects of E2 on hepatic injury are mediated via the nongenomic pathway. Furthermore, inhibition of PKA in E2-BSA-treated trauma-hemorrhage rats abolished the beneficial effect of E2-BSA in attenuating hepatic injury. Based on these findings, we propose that E2-BSA mediates its nongenomic effect on protection against hepatic injury via GPR30 or ER-α-signaling pathway in which PKA plays an important role in nongenomic-mediated pathway after trauma-hemorrhage. GPR30 acts independently of ER-α and ER-β to promote rapid estrogen action.40 Overexpression of GPR30 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells restores the activation of adenylyl cyclase by E2,40 and suppression of GPR30 expression with anti-sense oligonucleotides or siRNA prevents E2-mediated cAMP-dependent signaling in keratinocytes39 and in SKBR3 breast cancer cells that lack ER-α and ER-β.17 In the current study, we found that inhibition of GPR30 by transfection with GPR30 siRNA prevented E2-BSA- or E2-mediated increases in PKA activity and Bcl-2 levels in isolated hepatocytes, whereas suppression of ER-α did not affect E2-BSA- or E2-up-regulated PKA activity. Because many studies have reported that PKA regulates survival signaling through Bcl-2,19,42,43,44 we did not measure Bcl-2 levels in the ER-α-suppressed hepatocytes. These results, therefore, suggest that the nongenomic effect of E2 on attenuation of hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated through PKA and Bcl-2 pathway via GPR30 but not ER-α. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that ER-α somehow contributes to E2-BSA- or E2-mediated protection of hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage. The activation of PKA pathway independent of ER-α suggests the existence of two separate E2 response mechanisms in E2-mediated attenuation of hepatic injury. Other investigators have reported that ER-α activates anti-apoptotic p38 MAPK and PI3K-Akt pathways.35 Thus, it can be suggested that ER-α also regulates p38 MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways in E2-mediated protection against hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage. Nonetheless, additional studies are needed to clarify the signaling pathway underlying E2 action on ER-α after trauma-hemorrhage. In summary, our results indicate that administration of E2-BSA or E2 after trauma-hemorrhage attenuated trauma-hemorrhage-induced hepatic injury and increased both GPR30 and ER-α levels and normalized PKA activity and Bcl-2 levels. Additional treatment with a PKA inhibitor in E2-BSA-treated trauma-hemorrhage rats prevented the salutary effect of E2-BSA on hepatic injury. Furthermore, suppression of GPR30 but not ER-α prevented E2-BSA- or E2-mediated up-regulation of PKA activity and BCl-2 levels in vitro. These results suggest that the nongenomic effect of E2 in attenuating hepatic injury after trauma-hemorrhage is mediated through the PKA-dependent pathway via GPR30. These findings suggest a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of hepatic injury after trauma and should be useful in designing innovative therapeutic approaches for the treatment of trauma patients. Acknowledgments We thank Bobbi Smith for her valuable help in editing the manuscript. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Dr. Irshad H. Chaudry, Center for Surgical Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd., Volker Hall, Room G094, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail: irshad.chaudry/at/ccc.uab.edu. Related Commentary on page 1148 Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants R37 GM-39519 and KO2 AI049960). Editorial note: A guest editor acted as editor-in-chief for this manuscript. No person at the University of Alabama at Birmingham was involved in the peer review process or final disposition for this article. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shock. 2004 Jun; 21(6):549-55.
[Shock. 2004]Am J Pathol. 2005 Dec; 167(6):1545-59.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Shock. 2005 Jun; 23(6):527-32.
[Shock. 2005]J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006 Sep; 41(3):511-21.
[J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006]Ann Surg. 2000 Nov; 232(5):673-9.
[Ann Surg. 2000]Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Oct; 16(8):362-7.
[Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005]Endocrinology. 2005 Feb; 146(2):624-32.
[Endocrinology. 2005]J Hepatol. 2004 Sep; 41(3):414-20.
[J Hepatol. 2004]Cell Growth Differ. 2001 Aug; 12(8):397-408.
[Cell Growth Differ. 2001]Hepatology. 1983 Mar-Apr; 3(2):162-9.
[Hepatology. 1983]FASEB J. 2006 Jun; 20(8):1109-17.
[FASEB J. 2006]J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004 Oct; 37(4):847-55.
[J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004]Shock. 2000 Aug; 14(2):81-90.
[Shock. 2000]J Trauma. 2003 May; 54(5 Suppl):S118-25.
[J Trauma. 2003]Kidney Int. 1998 Nov; 54(5):1746-50.
[Kidney Int. 1998]Shock. 1994 Jun; 1(6):438-42.
[Shock. 1994]Genes Dev. 1999 Dec 15; 13(24):3191-7.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11; 93(12):5925-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Am J Pathol. 2004 Jun; 164(6):1915-24.
[Am J Pathol. 2004]Am J Pathol. 2001 Jul; 159(1):79-92.
[Am J Pathol. 2001]Science. 2005 Mar 11; 307(5715):1625-30.
[Science. 2005]Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002 Dec 1; 22(12):1952-61.
[Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002]Science. 2005 Mar 11; 307(5715):1625-30.
[Science. 2005]J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Aug; 123(2):329-37.
[J Invest Dermatol. 2004]Mol Endocrinol. 2002 Jan; 16(1):70-84.
[Mol Endocrinol. 2002]Gastroenterology. 2004 Sep; 127(3):914-23.
[Gastroenterology. 2004]J Hepatol. 2004 Sep; 41(3):414-20.
[J Hepatol. 2004]Mol Endocrinol. 2002 Jan; 16(1):70-84.
[Mol Endocrinol. 2002]J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Aug; 123(2):329-37.
[J Invest Dermatol. 2004]Endocrinology. 2005 Feb; 146(2):624-32.
[Endocrinology. 2005]Cell Growth Differ. 2001 Aug; 12(8):397-408.
[Cell Growth Differ. 2001]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Jul; 21(14):4636-46.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]