![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology Redirection of Metabolism for Biological Hydrogen Production † Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7242,1 Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 522422 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Box 357242, 1959 N. E. Pacific Street, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7242. Phone: (206) 221-2848. Fax: (206) 543-8297. E-mail: csh5/at/u.washington.edu. Received November 2, 2006; Accepted January 3, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract A major route for hydrogen production by purple photosynthetic bacteria is biological nitrogen fixation. Nitrogenases reduce atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia with the concomitant obligate production of molecular hydrogen. However, hydrogen production in the context of nitrogen fixation is a rather inefficient process because about 75% of the reductant consumed by the nitrogenase is used to generate ammonia. In this study we describe a selection strategy to isolate strains of purple photosynthetic bacteria in which hydrogen production is necessary for growth and independent of nitrogen fixation. We obtained four mutant strains of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris that produce hydrogen constitutively, even in the presence of ammonium, a condition where wild-type cells do not accumulate detectable amounts of hydrogen. Some of these strains produced up to five times more hydrogen than did wild-type cells growing under nitrogen-fixing conditions. Transcriptome analyses of the hydrogen-producing mutant strains revealed that in addition to the nitrogenase genes, 18 other genes are potentially required to produce hydrogen. The mutations that caused constitutive hydrogen production mapped to four different sites in the NifA transcriptional regulator in the four different strains. The strategy presented here can be applied to the large number of diverse species of anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria that are known to exist in nature to identify strains for which there are fitness incentives to produce hydrogen. Photosynthetic microbes can produce the clean-burning fuel hydrogen gas (hydrogen) using one of nature's most plentiful resources, sunlight (4, 8, 25). A major route for hydrogen production is biological nitrogen fixation (8, 9, 25). This is catalyzed by the enzyme nitrogenase, and hydrogen is an obligatory, but not advantageous, product of a reaction that evolved to enable cells to synthesize ammonia from nitrogen gas (32). The most extensively studied form of nitrogenase is the molybdenum-containing nitrogenase. It consists of two metalloprotein components, dinitrogenase reductase (encoded by nifH) and dinitrogenase (encoded by nifDK). Dinitrogenase reductase, a homodimer, transfers electrons to the dinitrogenase in a reaction that is coupled to ATP hydrolysis. Nitrogen gas and protons are reduced to ammonia and molecular hydrogen by the dinitrogenase component, which is an α2β2 heterotetramer. It contains two different types of metallocenters called the iron-molybdenum cofactor, which is the substrate reduction site, and the P-cluster, which participates in electron transfer from the dinitrogenase reductase to the reduction site (2). Many accessory proteins participate in the synthesis of the transition metal cofactor and in the assembly of the nitrogenase (28). Most bacteria express the nitrogenase only during ammonia deprivation. The photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris is well suited as a biocatalyst for a nitrogenase-dependent process for hydrogen production because it encodes three nitrogenase isozymes, it can use a wide variety of carbon compounds as the source of reductant, and it contains a photosynthetic apparatus that efficiently harnesses energy from sunlight (16, 24, 29). However, hydrogen production is not advantageous for most photosynthetic bacteria, including R. palustris, and this is a potential obstacle to an eventual efficient commercial process. Here we describe a strategy to identify strains of anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria for which growth depends on hydrogen production. When we incubated R. palustris with an electron-rich carbon source, we obtained mutants in which metabolism was redirected such that cells used the nitrogenase as an electron sink and hydrogen-producing enzyme, and not as a catalyst for ammonia synthesis. The mutations that led to constitutive hydrogen production by R. palustris mapped to the transcriptional regulatory gene nifA in all cases. By transcriptomic analysis, we found that, in addition to nitrogenase genes, 18 genes outside of the nitrogenase gene cluster may contribute to hydrogen production. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains and growth conditions. The bacterial strains and plasmids used are listed in Table 1. All work was carried out with the R. palustris wild-type strain CGA009 or its derivatives. Strain CGA009 is defective in uptake hydrogenase activity (27). R. palustris was grown and manipulated aerobically in defined PM mineral medium (14) containing 10 mM succinate as a carbon and energy source and antibiotic additions as indicated. Otherwise, R. palustris strains were grown in defined medium (10 ml) anaerobically in light in sealed tubes (27 ml) with argon gas in the headspace (17 ml) and (NH4)2SO4 supplied as a nitrogen source (non-nitrogen-fixing conditions) or with nitrogen gas in the headspace with (NH4)2SO4 omitted (nitrogen-fixing conditions). Carbon sources were supplied as indicated in the text. Escherichia coli strains DH5α and S17-1 were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Where indicated, R. palustris was grown with 100 μg of gentamicin (Gm) per ml. E. coli was grown with 100 μg of ampicillin per ml or 20 μg of Gm per ml.
Strain constructions. DNA fragments (~3 kb) spanning nifA plus flanking regions from R. palustris strains CGA571 and CGA574 were generated by PCR. The amplification products contained engineered XbaI cloning sites at both ends. These products were digested with XbaI and cloned into XbaI-digested pUC19 to generate pUC19-nifA*571 and pUC19-nifA*574. The XbaI fragments were then cloned into pJQ200KS to generate pJQ200KS-nifA*571 and pJQ200KS-nifA*574. This construct was mobilized from E. coli S17-1 into R. palustris CGA757 (ΔnifA; this strain cannot grow under nitrogen-fixing conditions) by conjugation. Colonies that contained plasmids that had undergone a single recombination to become inserted into the chromosome were identified by growth on PM mineral medium plus Gm. These colonies were spread on plates supplemented with 10% sucrose to counterselect against the sacB marker and incubated anaerobically under nitrogen-fixing conditions in order to select for strains that had undergone a double recombination to lose the sacB-containing vector. Gene replacements were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. Description of the R. palustris GeneChip. A R. palustris custom-designed GeneChip was manufactured by Affymetrix according to the following specifications: 99.8% of R. palustris predicted open reading frame genes were represented by unique probe sets (16 probe pairs and their corresponding mismatch for each). In addition, the GeneChip contains information for all intergenic regions larger than 150 bp. DNA microarray experiments. RNA was isolated as previously described (24). For cDNA synthesis, we used 10 μg of purified RNA, semirandom hexamer primers with an average G+C content of 75%, and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). Fragmentation and labeling were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Affymetrix). Samples were hybridized and scanned at the Center for Expression Arrays, University of Washington, according to the specifications provided by the manufacturer. The Affymetrix Microarray Suite was used for initial data acquisition and processing. Transcript data were further analyzed using Cyber-T (http://visitor.ics.uci.edu/genex/cybert) as previously described (30) with a P value threshold of 0.001, resulting in a corresponding posterior probability of differential expression no lower than 0.9975. Nitrogenase activity and hydrogen measurements. Nitrogenase activity was measured by the acetylene reduction assay as described previously (24). Hydrogen was measured using a Hewlett Packard 5890 series II gas chromatograph equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and molecular sieve 13X column (80/100 mesh; inner diameter,1/4 in. by 8 ft) (24). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA) protein assay kit. Gene sequencing. In order to identify the mutation(s) responsible for the hydrogen-producing phenotype, we sequenced nifA and its promoter region, glnK1, draT1, draT2, and draG, in all strains. In addition, we sequenced regS, regR, cbbR, glnB, and glnK2 in strain CGA570 and ntrB, ntrC, glnK2, vnfA, and anfA in strain CGA572. Microarray accession number. The transcriptome data have been deposited at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo under accession number GSE5194. RESULTS Isolation of mutant strains of R. palustris that produce hydrogen in the presence of ammonium. When grown in light with organic compounds present, anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria, the metabolic group to which R. palustris belongs, generate ATP by cyclic photophosphorylation and use carbon compounds to make cell biomass (photoheterotrophic growth). Carbon substrates that are electron rich relative to cell material cannot be assimilated unless an external electron sink, such as carbon dioxide, nitrate, or dimethyl sulfoxide, is available to dissipate excess reducing equivalents (22). Another process to dissipate excess reducing power is nitrogen fixation (12). Consistent with this, we noticed that R. palustris grew on the electron-rich carbon compound cyclohexanecarboxylate if it was able to generate hydrogen as part of the process of nitrogen fixation (Table 2 and Fig. Fig.1).1
Nitrogenase genes and a small number of other genes are highly expressed in the hydrogen-producing strains. We analyzed the transcriptomes of each of the four hydrogen-producing strains grown with acetate in light in the presence of ammonium sulfate, a condition that normally represses nitrogenase synthesis. As expected, the structural genes nifHDK, encoding the two subunits of molybdenum nitrogenase, were among those most highly expressed by the hydrogen-producing strains. Most of the 30 genes that surround nifHDK on the R. palustris chromosome were also expressed at high levels in the mutant strains (Fig. (Fig.2).2
Normally, cells produce hydrogen as an unintended consequence of nitrogen fixation during ammonia deprivation, an environmental cue that alters the expression levels of about 4% of the genome (24). The transcriptomes of the hydrogen-producing strains allowed us to identify genes that might be important for hydrogen production, as opposed to adaptation to ammonium starvation. Only 21 genes that are physically distant from the molybdenum nitrogenase cluster showed increased expression in at least three of the hydrogen-producing mutant strains compared to the wild type. A subset of 18 of these genes also had increased expression levels in the wild type under nitrogen-fixing (and hydrogen-producing) conditions (Table 6). Some of these likely encode proteins that indirectly facilitate nitrogenase activity, for example, by supplying iron needed for enzyme function (RPA2380 to RPA2388). Of more direct relevance to hydrogen production are genes that enhance the ability of R. palustris to convert light to ATP or that are involved in efficient channeling to nitrogenase of electrons required for the reduction of protons into molecular hydrogen. RPA3012 to RPA3013 encode light-harvesting II polypeptides that function to absorb light energy and transfer it to the bacteriochlorophyll-containing reaction center where it is converted into a proton gradient that is used to generate ATP (16, 29). RPA1928 codes for a ferredoxin predicted to function as an electron carrier. It may act in concert with the RPA1927 protein in this capacity. Electron transfer can be rate-limiting for nitrogenase activity (11). The intracellular pathways of transfer from electron-donating substrate to the nitrogenase have not yet been studied in R. palustris but bear investigation as, in addition to RPA1928, four other ferredoxin genes, all in the nitrogenase gene cluster, are expressed at high levels in the hydrogen-producing strains. Understanding the individual roles of these ferredoxins in the transfer of electrons to nitrogenase will be important for developing a complete understanding of the route to hydrogen production from electron-donating organic compounds in whole cells. In addition to genes of known or suspected function, the hydrogen-producing R. palustris strains expressed several genes (RPA2156, RPA4714, and RPA4827) of unknown function to high levels.
Single-amino-acid changes in the enhancer-binding protein NifA are sufficient to elicit nitrogenase expression and hydrogen production. The R. palustris genome codes for a set of regulatory proteins that overlap with those known to control nitrogen fixation in other bacteria in response to intracellular nitrogen status (6, 16, 21, 24, 37, 38). To identify the mutations responsible for constitutive hydrogen production, we sequenced genes predicted to be involved in these regulatory networks (Materials and Methods). We identified four different single point mutations in the regulatory gene nifA in the four hydrogen-producing strains (Fig. (Fig.3).3
To determine whether the amino acid changes identified in NifA were sufficient to cause the hydrogen production phenotype, we introduced two of the mutated nifA genes, one encoding the Q209P change and the other encoding the M202K change, by homologous recombination into the chromosome of an R. palustris strain that has a nifA deletion mutation (Table 1). Both recombinant strains behaved similarly to the original nifA mutants and grew with cyclohexanecarboxylate as a carbon source (doubling times [in hours], 18 ± 3 for strain CGA581 and 17 ± 1 for strain CGA584). They also had nitrogenase activity (nitrogenase activity [in nmol C2H4 formed/min/mg protein], 74 ± 13 for strain CGA581 and 75 ± 23 for strain CGA584) and produced hydrogen when grown on acetate in the presence of ammonium (hydrogen production [in μmol H2/mg protein], 95 ± 36 for strain CGA581 and 101 ± 6 for strain CGA584). We carried out a transcriptome analysis of one of the recombinant strains (CGA584) and found that it had elevated levels of gene expression that were similar in magnitude to those of the original hydrogen-producing mutant (Table 6; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). This indicates that the mutations that we identified in nifA are sufficient to activate all genes necessary for hydrogen production. We cannot exclude the possibility that the strains may also have additional mutations that contribute to the differences observed in growth, nitrogenase activity, and hydrogen production among the isolated mutant strains. DISCUSSION The development of a photobiological process for hydrogen production will likely depend on using whole bacterial cells as biocatalysts to efficiently supply ATP and electrons needed for nitrogenase activity. Hydrogen formation in the context of nitrogen fixation is wasteful for cells because it represents a loss of reductant that could have been used for ammonia formation. In addition, anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria accumulate nitrogenase mutations under conditions where the conversion of nitrogen gas into ammonia is not obligatory (34). Here we have described a strategy to select for mutants of R. palustris for which hydrogen production is advantageous and required in order for cells to use electron-rich carbon sources for growth. This could be a useful trait in the context of an eventual commercial process, as it provides a selection strategy that can be applied to maintain continuous hydrogen production. In many organisms, the activity of NifA is modulated by PII signal transduction proteins (GlnB, GlnK1, and GlnK2 in R. palustris) (7). By analogy with studies from other bacteria, it is possible that the mutations described here allow NifA to escape the inhibition by PII proteins that normally occurs during growth with ammonium (7, 23). Our transcriptome analyses indicated that, in addition to nitrogenase genes, 18 genes outside of the nitrogenase gene cluster were expressed at elevated levels in the four mutants. These genes (Fig. (Fig.22 In many bacteria, nitrogenase activity is tightly controlled posttranslationally by DraT and DraG enzymes (13, 17). DraT modifies and inactivates dinitrogenase reductase by ADP-ribosylation in response to exogenous ammonium, while DraG removes that modification under conditions appropriate to fix atmospheric nitrogen. draG and draT genes appear to be expressed constitutively in R. palustris regardless of fixed nitrogen status (24). The hydrogen-producing strains isolated in this study have nitrogenase activities in the presence of ammonium that are comparable to those exhibited by wild-type cells grown under nitrogen-fixing conditions (Table 5). This suggests that DraT is not extensively “switching off” nitrogenase in these strains. We were surprised that the draT and draG genes were not mutated in the hydrogen-producing strains. We speculate that nitrogenase is not significantly inactivated during growth with ammonium because under this condition many of the genes controlled by the NtrB-NtrC two-component system are not expressed by the hydrogen-producing mutants. The NtrB-NtrC system has been shown to be necessary for posttranslational modification of nitrogenase by DraT in Rhodospirillum rubrum and Azospirillum brasilense (15, 18, 36). Although the determinants of this effect have not been elucidated, it is likely that NtrB-NtrC control the expression of signal transduction proteins that might be required for DraT-dependent inactivation of the nitrogenase (7, 10, 15, 18, 36). In addition to its molybdenum nitrogenase, R. palustris encodes vanadium and iron nitrogenases (16). Alternative nitrogenase synthesis depends on many of the cofactor synthesis and assembly proteins encoded by the nif gene cluster (24). Thus, we expect that a second mutation in addition to a nifA mutation would be necessary for constitutive synthesis of anf and vnf genes for alternative nitrogenases. In other bacteria, mutations other than nifA mutations may be required for constitutive hydrogen production via nitrogenase. In Rhodobacter capsulatus, a double mutation in the signal transduction genes glnB and glnK resulted in constitutive hydrogen production (7). In Rhodobacter sphaeroides, a mutant that produced hydrogen constitutively was obtained from a strain defective in carbon dioxide fixation (12). However, the site of the mutation leading to hydrogen production was not reported. An analysis of strains of diverse species of photosynthetic bacteria whose growth depends on constitutive hydrogen production has the potential to reveal new hydrogen-producing enzymes, highlight the diversity of strategies that can used by bacteria to regulate hydrogen production, and uncover new genes that may be important for enabling hydrogen-producing enzymes to function efficiently in whole cells. [Supplemental material]
Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy (grant DE-FG02-01ER63241), and by the U.S. Army Research Office (grant W911NF-05-1-0176). We thank Sudip Samanta for constructing strain CGA757. Footnotes Published ahead of print on 12 January 2007.†Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. REFERENCES 1. Bulen, W. A., R. C. Burns, and J. R. Lecomte. 1965. Nitrogen fixation: hydrosulfite as electron donor with cell-free preparations of Azotobacter vinelandii and Rhodospirillum rubrum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 53:532-539. [PubMed] 2. Burgess, B. K., and D. J. Lowe. 1996. Mechanism of molybdenum nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 96:2983-3012. [PubMed] 3. Chen, S., L. Liu, X. Zhou, C. Elmerich, and J. L. Li. 2005. Functional analysis of the GAF domain of NifA in Azospirillum brasilense: effects of Tyr→Phe mutations on NifA and its interaction with GlnB. Mol. Genet. Genomics 273:415-422. [PubMed] 4. Das, D., and T. N. Veziroglu. 2001. Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 26:13-28. 5. D'Autreaux, B., N. P. Tucker, R. Dixon, and S. Spiro. 2005. A non-haem iron centre in the transcription factor NorR senses nitric oxide. Nature 437:769-772. [PubMed] 6. Dixon, R., and D. Kahn. 2004. Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:621-631. [PubMed] 7. Drepper, T., S. Gross, A. F. Yakunin, P. C. Hallenbeck, B. Masepohl, and W. Klipp. 2003. Role of GlnB and GlnK in ammonium control of both nitrogenase systems in the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. Microbiology 149:2203-2212. [PubMed] 8. Gest, H., M. D. Kamen, and H. M. Bregoff. 1950. Studies on the metabolism of photosynthetic bacteria. Photoproduction of hydrogen and nitrogen fixation by Rhodospirillum rubrum. J. Biol. Chem. 182:153-170. 9. Hillmer, P., and H. Gest. 1977. H2 metabolism in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas capsulata: production and utilization of H2 by resting cells. J. Bacteriol. 129:732-739. [PubMed] 10. Huergo, L. F., L. S. Chubatsu, E. M. Souza, F. O. Pedrosa, M. B. Steffens, and M. Merrick. 2006. Interactions between PII proteins and the nitrogenase regulatory enzymes DraT and DraG in Azospirillum brasilense. FEBS Lett. 580:5232-5236. [PubMed] 11. Jeong, H. S., and Y. Jouanneau. 2000. Enhanced nitrogenase activity in strains of Rhodobacter capsulatus that overexpress the rnf genes. J. Bacteriol. 182:1208-1214. [PubMed] 12. Joshi, H. M., and F. R. Tabita. 1996. A global two component signal transduction system that integrates the control of photosynthesis, carbon dioxide assimilation, and nitrogen fixation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14515-14520. [PubMed] 13. Kanemoto, R. H., and P. W. Ludden. 1984. Effect of ammonia, darkness, and phenazine methosulfate on whole-cell nitrogenase activity and Fe protein modification in Rhodospirillum rubrum. J. Bacteriol. 158:713-720. [PubMed] 14. Kim, M.-K., and C. S. Harwood. 1991. Regulation of benzoate-CoA ligase in Rhodopseudomonas palustris. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 83:199-204. 15. Klassen, G., E. M. Souza, M. G. Yates, L. U. Rigo, R. M. Costa, J. Inaba, and F. O. Pedrosa. 2005. Nitrogenase switch-off by ammonium ions in Azospirillum brasilense requires the GlnB nitrogen signal-transducing protein. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:5637-5641. [PubMed] 16. Larimer, F. W., P. Chain, L. Hauser, J. Lamerdin, S. Malfatti, L. Do, M. L. Land, D. A. Pelletier, J. T. Beatty, A. S. Lang, F. R. Tabita, J. L. Gibson, T. E. Hanson, C. Bobst, J. L. Torres, C. Peres, F. H. Harrison, J. Gibson, and C. S. Harwood. 2004. Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:55-61. [PubMed] 17. Liang, J. H., G. M. Nielsen, D. P. Lies, R. H. Burris, G. P. Roberts, and P. W. Ludden. 1991. Mutations in the draT and draG genes of Rhodospirillum rubrum result in loss of regulation of nitrogenase by reversible ADP-ribosylation. J. Bacteriol. 173:6903-6909. [PubMed] 18. Liang, Y. Y., F. Arsene, and C. Elmerich. 1993. Characterization of the ntrBC genes of Azospirillum brasilense Sp7: their involvement in the regulation of nitrogenase synthesis and activity. Mol. Gen. Genet. 240:188-196. [PubMed] 19. Little, R., and R. Dixon. 2003. The amino-terminal GAF domain of Azotobacter vinelandii NifA binds 2-oxoglutarate to resist inhibition by NifL under nitrogen-limiting conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 278:28711-28718. [PubMed] 20. Martinez-Argudo, I., R. Little, and R. Dixon. 2004. Role of the amino-terminal GAF domain of the NifA activator in controlling the response to the antiactivator protein NifL. Mol. Microbiol. 52:1731-1744. [PubMed] 21. Masepohl, B., T. Drepper, A. Paschen, S. Gross, A. Pawlowski, K. Raabe, K. U. Riedel, and W. Klipp. 2002. Regulation of nitrogen fixation in the phototrophic purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 4:243-248. [PubMed] 22. McEwan, A. G. 1994. Photosynthetic electron transport and anaerobic metabolism in purple non-sulfur phototrophic bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 66:151-164. [PubMed] 23. Michel-Reydellet, N., and P. A. Kaminski. 1999. Azorhizobium caulinodans PII and GlnK proteins control nitrogen fixation and ammonia assimilation. J. Bacteriol. 181:2655-2658. [PubMed] 24. Oda, Y., S. K. Samanta, F. E. Rey, L. Wu, X. Liu, T. Yan, J. Zhou, and C. S. Harwood. 2005. Functional genomic analysis of three nitrogenase isozymes in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. J. Bacteriol. 187:7784-7794. [PubMed] 25. Prince, R. C., and H. S. Kheshgi. 2005. The photobiological production of hydrogen: potential efficiency and effectiveness as a renewable fuel. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 31:19-31. [PubMed] 26. Quandt, J., and M. F. Hynes. 1993. Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in gram-negative bacteria. Gene 127:15-21. [PubMed] 27. Rey, F. E., Y. Oda, and C. S. Harwood. 2006. Regulation of uptake hydrogenase and effects of hydrogen utilization on gene expression in Rhodopseudomonas palustris. J. Bacteriol. 188:6143-6152. [PubMed] 28. Rubio, L. M., and P. W. Ludden. 2005. Maturation of nitrogenase: a biochemical puzzle. J. Bacteriol. 187:405-414. [PubMed] 29. Scheuring, S., R. P. Goncalves, V. Prima, and J. N. Sturgis. 2006. The photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodopseudomonas palustris: structures and organization. J. Mol. Biol. 358:83-96. [PubMed] 30. Schuster, M., C. P. Lostroh, T. Ogi, and E. P. Greenberg. 2003. Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-controlled genes: a transcriptome analysis. J. Bacteriol. 185:2066-2079. [PubMed] 31. Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Pühler. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram-negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1:784-791. 32. Simpson, F. B., and R. H. Burris. 1984. A nitrogen pressure of 50 atmospheres does not prevent evolution of hydrogen by nitrogenase. Science 224:1095-1097. [PubMed] 33. Studholme, D. J., and R. Dixon. 2003. Domain architectures of σ54-dependent transcriptional activators. J. Bacteriol. 185:1757-1767. [PubMed] 34. Wall, J. D., J. Love, and S. P. Quinn. 1984. Spontaneous Nif− mutants of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. J. Bacteriol. 159:652-657. [PubMed] 35. Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119. [PubMed] 36. Zhang, Y., A. D. Cummings, R. H. Burris, P. W. Ludden, and G. P. Roberts. 1995. Effect of an ntrBC mutation on the posttranslational regulation of nitrogenase activity in Rhodospirillum rubrum. J. Bacteriol. 177:5322-5326. [PubMed] 37. Zhang, Y., E. L. Pohlmann, P. W. Ludden, and G. P. Roberts. 2001. Functional characterization of three GlnB homologs in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum: roles in sensing ammonium and energy status. J. Bacteriol. 183:6159-6168. [PubMed] 38. Zhang, Y., E. L. Pohlmann, and G. P. Roberts. 2005. GlnD is essential for NifA activation, NtrB/NtrC-regulated gene expression, and posttranslational regulation of nitrogenase activity in the photosynthetic, nitrogen-fixing bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum. J. Bacteriol. 187:1254-1265. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2005; 31(1):19-31.
[Crit Rev Microbiol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 1977 Feb; 129(2):732-9.
[J Bacteriol. 1977]Science. 1984 Jun 8; 224(4653):1095-7.
[Science. 1984]Chem Rev. 1996 Nov 7; 96(7):2983-3012.
[Chem Rev. 1996]J Bacteriol. 2005 Jan; 187(2):405-14.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):55-61.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 21; 358(1):83-96.
[J Mol Biol. 2006]J Bacteriol. 2006 Sep; 188(17):6143-52.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 2003 Apr; 185(7):2066-79.
[J Bacteriol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994; 66(1-3):151-64.
[Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10; 93(25):14515-20.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Mar; 53():532-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965]Chem Rev. 1996 Nov 7; 96(7):2983-3012.
[Chem Rev. 1996]J Bacteriol. 1977 Feb; 129(2):732-9.
[J Bacteriol. 1977]J Bacteriol. 2005 Jan; 187(2):405-14.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):55-61.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 21; 358(1):83-96.
[J Mol Biol. 2006]J Bacteriol. 2000 Mar; 182(5):1208-14.
[J Bacteriol. 2000]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Aug; 2(8):621-31.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):55-61.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 May; 4(3):243-8.
[J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 2001 Nov; 183(21):6159-68.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]J Bacteriol. 1984 Aug; 159(2):652-7.
[J Bacteriol. 1984]Microbiology. 2003 Aug; 149(Pt 8):2203-12.
[Microbiology. 2003]J Bacteriol. 1999 Apr; 181(8):2655-8.
[J Bacteriol. 1999]J Bacteriol. 1984 May; 158(2):713-20.
[J Bacteriol. 1984]J Bacteriol. 1991 Nov; 173(21):6903-9.
[J Bacteriol. 1991]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep; 71(9):5637-41.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005]Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Aug; 240(2):188-96.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1993]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):55-61.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(22):7784-94.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]Microbiology. 2003 Aug; 149(Pt 8):2203-12.
[Microbiology. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10; 93(25):14515-20.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]