![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Sprouty-2 regulates oncogenic K-ras in lung development and tumorigenesis 1 Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; 2 Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; 3 Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA; 4 Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; 5 Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; 6 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA; 7 Department of Pathology, Tufts University School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA; 8 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA; 9 Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom 10Corresponding author.E-MAIL tjacks/at/mit.edu; FAX (617) 253-9863. Received December 27, 2006; Accepted February 5, 2007. This article has been corrected. See Genes Dev. 2008 January 15; 22(2): 277. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Somatic activation of Ras occurs frequently in human cancers, including one-third of lung cancers. Activating Ras mutations also occur in the germline, leading to complex developmental syndromes. The precise mechanism by which Ras activation results in human disease is uncertain. Here we describe the phenotype of a mouse engineered to harbor a germline oncogenic K-rasG12D mutation. This mouse exhibits early embryonic lethality due to a placental trophoblast defect. Reconstitution with a wild-type placenta rescues the early lethality, but mutant embryos still succumb to cardiovascular and hematopoietic defects. In addition, mutant embryos demonstrate a profound defect in lung branching morphogenesis associated with striking up-regulation of the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) antagonist Sprouty-2 and abnormal localization of MAPK activity within the lung epithelium. This defect can be significantly suppressed by lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of Sprouty-2 in vivo. Furthermore, in the context of K-rasG12D-mediated lung tumorigenesis, Sprouty-2 is also up-regulated and functions as a tumor suppressor to limit tumor number and overall tumor burden. These findings indicate that in the lung, Sprouty-2 plays a critical role in the regulation of oncogenic K-ras, and implicate counter-regulatory mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Ras-based disease. Keywords: K-ras, mouse models, lung development, lung cancer, Sprouty Ras proteins play a critical role in the regulation of normal cellular proliferation as well as in the development of neoplasia. Activating mutations in the three major Ras family members (H-ras, N-ras, and K-ras) are found in ~30% of all human tumors (Bos 1989). Certain tumor types have a particularly high incidence of activating Ras mutations, including pancreatic, colon, and lung carcinomas. These mutations are predominantly missense mutations involving codons 12, 13, and 61, and compromise the GTPase activity of Ras, resulting in the accumulation of active, GTP-bound Ras. Upon activation, Ras proteins engage multiple downstream effectors, leading to a wide range of biological responses, from proliferation to differentiation to apoptosis. Through the aberrant regulation of these effectors, oncogenic Ras proteins mediate several key aspects of malignant transformation, including deregulated cell growth and evasion of apoptosis (Downward 2002). However, the precise roles of individual Ras effectors in transformation and tumorigenesis are poorly understood (Malumbres and Barbacid 2003). For example, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and epithelial hyperplasias expressing physiologic levels of oncogenic K-ras are hyperproliferative, yet show attenuation rather than augmentation of Raf/Mek/Erk or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling (Guerra et al. 2003; Tuveson et al. 2004). These results highlight the complexity of the Ras signaling network, with differential activation of effector pathways depending on cellular context, as well as negative regulation of pathway activity through cross-talk and feedback inhibition. Whereas the oncogenic properties of Ras proteins have been the subject of intense investigation, relatively few studies have addressed the role of Ras in normal mammalian development. These studies have primarily used gene targeting strategies to disrupt Ras oncogenes, singly and in combination. Although H-ras, N-ras, and K-ras are all widely expressed during embryogenesis, only K-ras is essential for normal mouse development (Johnson et al. 1997). Embryos homozygous for a null mutation of K-ras (K-ras−/−) die between embryonic days 12.5 and 14.5 (E12.5 and E14.5) of anemia and fetal liver defects. These defects may be related to abnormalities in cytokine-induced formation of E-cadherin-based adherens junctions (Matsui et al. 2002), or may be secondary to extraembryonic dysfunction (A. Shaw, unpubl.). In contrast, targeted disruption of H-ras or N-ras, individually and in combination, results in no discernible phenotype (Esteban et al. 2001). While useful in establishing a unique and essential role for K-ras in development (Johnson et al. 1997), this loss-of-function approach has provided limited insight into mechanisms of Ras-mediated transformation. To date, gain-of-function mutants have not been extensively characterized in the context of early mouse development. Analysis of such mutants would be relevant to the pathogenesis of neoplastic as well as developmental disorders. In particular, several overlapping human genetic syndromes, including Costello, Noonan, and cardio-facio-cutaneous (CFC) syndromes, have recently been shown to be caused by germline activating mutations in Ras and other genes associated with Ras/MAPK signaling (Aoki et al. 2005; Niihori et al. 2006; Rodriguez-Viciana et al. 2006; Schubbert et al. 2006). While the H-ras mutations identified in Costello syndrome are also found somatically in various tumors (Aoki et al. 2005), the K-ras mutations discovered in Noonan and CFC syndrome are novel and confer distinct gain-of-function properties (Schubbert et al. 2006). These observations suggest that oncogenic K-ras mutations such as K-rasG12D are not tolerated during human development. Indeed, we previously demonstrated that expression of K-rasG12D in the mouse germline is embryonic lethal, with mutants dying by midgestation (Tuveson et al. 2004). Here we report the first detailed description of the consequences of oncogenic K-ras activation in the developing mouse. In addition to placental, cardiovascular, and hematopoietic defects, mutant embryos also exhibit a profound defect in lung branching morphogenesis. Using both in vivo RNA interference (RNAi) and traditional genetic approaches, we show that the Ras/MAPK antagonist Sprouty-2 (Spry-2) is a critical mediator of the lung branching phenotype. We also show that Spry-2 functions as a tumor suppressor in K-rasG12D-mediated lung tumorigenesis. These results highlight the potential involvement of negative regulators of Ras signaling in developmental as well as neoplastic disorders. Results The early embryonic lethality associated with germline oncogenic K-ras is due to extraembryonic dysfunction We activated expression of oncogenic K-ras in the mouse germline by crossing mice carrying a Protamine-Cre (Prm-Cre) transgene (O’Gorman et al. 1997) with conditional LSL-K-rasG12D mice (Jackson et al. 2001). Germline mutants die between E9.5 and E11.5 with developmental arrest and widespread apoptosis (Tuveson et al. 2004). To determine whether extraembryonic dysfunction contributes to this early lethality, we first analyzed the yolk sacs and placentas of E9.5 embryos. On gross examination, mutant yolk sacs appeared pale and roughened, with poorly developed vasculature (Fig. 1A
The extraembryonic phenotype of K-rasG12D mutants suggested a primary defect in vascular endothelial cells. However, LSL-K-rasG12D;Tie2-Cre compound mutants in which K-ras activation is restricted to the endothelial cell compartment showed normal vascularization of both the yolk sac and the placental labyrinth (Supplementary Fig. 1). To investigate the role of placental trophoblast cells, we crossed LSL-K-rasG12D mice with Mox2-Cre transgenic mice (Tallquist and Soriano 2000). LSL-K-rasG12D;Mox2-Cre compound mutants express Cre under the control of the endogenous Mox2 promoter, leading to recombination throughout the embryo proper (Wu et al. 2003), but not in the trophoblast or extraembryonic endoderm (Fig. 2A
LSL-K-rasG12D;Mox2-Cre mutants were produced at near Mendelian frequency at E12.5 (n = 32/160; 20%) and at lower frequency at E13.5 (n = 16/105; 15%), developmental stages at which K-rasG12D;Prm-Cre embryos are never recovered (Tuveson et al. 2004). Importantly, the yolk sacs and placentas of LSL-K-rasG12D;Mox2-Cre mutants were indistinguishable from wild-type controls (Fig. 2B,C Germline mutants expressing oncogenic K-ras in the embryo proper die of cardiovascular and hematopoietic defects Germline K-rasG12D embryos supplied by functionally normal placentas bypass the lethality due to trophoblast dysfunction, but still die by E14.5. At E12.5, mutants appeared grossly normal in appearance (Fig. 2D In addition to heart defects, K-rasG12D embryos also exhibited fetal liver defects, with extensive areas of apoptotic cell death superimposed on a hypocellular background (Supplementary Fig. 3C,D). In colony formation assays, fetal-liver-derived hematopoietic progenitors expressing activated K-ras formed larger colony-forming unit–erythroid (CFU-E) and burst-forming unit–erythroid (BFU-E) colonies compared with wild-type controls (data not shown). However, mutant red cells appeared very immature and occasionally highly atypical (Supplementary Fig. 3E,F), consistent with a block in erythroid differentiation. Similar results have been observed when fetal liver erythroblasts are infected with retroviruses encoding oncogenic H-ras (Zhang et al. 2003) and when K-rasG12D is expressed in adult erythroid cells (Braun et al. 2006). Thus, K-rasG12D embryos likely die of heart failure as well as anemia. Oncogenic K-ras activation causes defective fetal lung branching morphogenesis In addition to marked defects in cardiovascular and hematopoietic development, germline activation of K-ras induces a striking fetal lung phenotype. In contrast to wild-type E12.5 fetal lungs, with secondary and tertiary bronchi visible within the lung lobes, K-rasG12D lungs contained large dilated bronchi (Fig. 3A
Lung branching morphogenesis is a complex developmental process involving reciprocal interactions between the lung epithelium and its underlying mesenchyme. To determine whether the branching defect identified in K-ras mutants resides in the epithelial or mesenchymal compartment of the lung, we used a doxycycline-inducible, Cre-regulated system to restrict expression of oncogenic K-ras to the developing lung epithelium (Perl et al. 2002). In this system, the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA) is expressed in epithelial cells under the control of the human surfactant protein C (SP-C) promoter. In the presence of doxycycline, the rtTA activates expression of a tet-responsive Cre transgene [(tetO)7-Cre], leading to Cre-mediated recombination of a target gene throughout the developing lung epithelium. As shown in Figure 3E Defective lung branching morphogenesis is accompanied by changes in epithelial cell differentiation but not proliferation or apoptosis To characterize the observed defect in lung branching at the cellular level, we first examined the proliferative rate of the developing lung epithelium. Surprisingly, wild-type and K-rasG12D-expressing lung epithelial cells demonstrated similar levels of proliferation, based on immunohistochemical staining for the mitosis marker phospho-histone H3 (pHH3) (Fig. 4A,C
To determine the effect of oncogenic K-ras on lung epithelial differentiation, we first examined expression of the epithelial cell marker thyroid transcription factor-1 (Titf1 or TTF-1) (Lazzaro et al. 1991). At E12.5, both wild-type and K-ras mutant fetal lungs demonstrated uniform expression of Titf1 in the primitive bronchial epithelium (data not shown). As markers of distinct lung epithelial cell lineages are not readily detectable until late gestation, we examined doxycycline-treated LSL-K-rasG12D;SPC-rtTA;(tetO)7-Cre compound mutants at E18.5. Immunofluorescence staining of both wild-type and K-ras mutant fetal lungs showed strong expression of SP-C (Fig. 4E The lung branching defect induced by oncogenic K-ras is associated with up-regulation of Sprouty-2 and abnormal MAP kinase localization The disruption in branching morphogenesis suggested a potential role for one or more branching regulators in mediating the lung phenotype of germline K-ras mutants. Among the key regulators of branching, Spry proteins were of particular interest given previous studies demonstrating MAPK attenuation in the setting of physiologic levels of oncogenic K-ras (Guerra et al. 2003; Tuveson et al. 2004), and the well-established role of Spry proteins as negative-feedback inhibitors of Ras/MAPK signaling. Specifically, Spry proteins have been shown to be induced by receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling (Minowada et al. 1999), and to antagonize RTK-dependent activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway at multiple levels (Mason et al. 2006). We therefore hypothesized that germline activation of K-ras might result in Spry overexpression, leading to aberrant MAPK regulation and disruption of normal lung development. To begin to test this hypothesis, we first examined the expression patterns of Spry genes in the developing lung by in situ hybridization. Whereas wild-type lungs showed variable expression of Spry-2, with high levels restricted to the leading edge of branching tips, K-rasG12D lungs exhibited significantly stronger and more uniform expression of Spry-2 throughout much of the mutant epithelium (Fig. 5A
The striking up-regulation of the Ras/MAPK antagonist Spry-2 in the setting of oncogenic K-ras suggested that aberrant MAPK activation might underlie the lung branching defect of germline K-ras mutants. In support of this notion, several studies have demonstrated an important role for MAPK activation in proper branching morphogenesis of the lung and kidney (Fisher et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2004). We first determined levels of phospho- and total MAPK by immunoblotting of whole cell lysates from wild-type and K-rasG12D fetal lungs. Curiously, mutant fetal lungs contained equal to mildly increased levels of phosphoMAPK compared with wild-type fetal lungs (Fig. 5C Lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of Spry-2 in vivo rescues the lung branching defect induced by oncogenic K-ras To rigorously test the role of Spry-2 induction in mediating the lung branching defect of K-rasG12D embryos, we used conditional RNAi to abrogate Spry-2 up-regulation upon K-ras activation in vivo. We first derived mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells carrying the conditional LSL-K-RasG12D allele as well as the SPC-rtTA and (tetO)7-Cre transgenes to allow doxycycline-inducible expression of Cre in the lung epithelium (Perl et al. 2002). Mutant ES cells were infected with lentivirus encoding GFP and a conditional, Cre-regulated, short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting Spry-2 (Ventura et al. 2004). Multiple, independent, GFP-positive ES clones were isolated and subsequently injected into wild-type tetraploid blastocysts. Recipient females were treated with doxycycline starting at E6.5, leading to activation of K-ras as well as knockdown of Spry-2 in the lung epithelium of developing embryos (Supplementary Fig. 5). For comparison, we also crossed the LSL-K-rasG12D allele together with the Mox2-Cre transgene into a Spry-2-null background. Both the knockdown and knockout approaches yielded similar results and are summarized together. On gross examination, knockdown mutant embryos were indistinguishable from control mutant embryos and showed uniform GFP expression (Fig. 6A
To establish the mechanistic role of Spry-2 at the molecular level, we examined expression levels and patterns of MAPK activation. Immunoblotting of whole cell lysates prepared from control mutant and knockdown mutant fetal lungs demonstrated efficient and specific knockdown of Spry-2 (but not Spry-1 or Spry-4), accompanied by augmented activation of MAPK signaling (Fig. 6E Spry-2 functions as a tumor suppressor in K-rasG12D-mediated lung tumorigenesis The functional interaction between oncogenic K-ras and Spry-2 during lung development suggested a potential role for Spry-2 in modulating the effects of oncogenic K-ras in lung tumorigenesis. To address this possibility, we first examined expression levels of Spry family members in mouse lung tumors induced by oncogenic K-ras. Individual lung tumors were isolated from 3- to 4-moold mice harboring a “latent” (LA2) K-rasG12D allele (Johnson et al. 2001). This allele is sporadically activated following a spontaneous recombination event, leading to expression of oncogenic K-ras and lung tumor formation in 100% of animals. Immunoblotting of whole cell lysates prepared from LA2 tumors demonstrated marked up-regulation of Spry-2 and, to a much lesser extent, Spry-1 compared with normal lung (Fig. 7A
To elucidate the role of Spry-2 induction in K-rasG12D-mediated lung tumorigenesis, we examined lung tumor development in the presence and absence of Spry-2. The LSL-K-rasG12D strain was crossed to a strain carrying a conditional null allele of Spry-2 (referred to as Spry-2Fl) (Shim et al. 2005) to generate compound mutants with the genotypes LSL-K-rasG12D; Spry-2Fl/+ and LSL-K-rasG12D; Spry-2Fl/Fl. Lung tumors were induced by intranasal instillation of adenovirus expressing Cre (Jackson et al. 2001), and animals were sacrificed after 6 mo. Based on histologic analysis, both the number of tumors as well as the total tumor area (as a proportion of total lung area) were significantly increased in the absence of Spry-2 (p = 0.0066 and p = 0.025, respectively) (Fig. 7C Discussion Despite several decades of intense study, the molecular basis of Ras oncogenicity remains incompletely understood. This lack of understanding likely stems from the complexity of the Ras signaling network. In addition to the canonical Ras effectors—Raf, PI3K, and RalGDS—at least seven other distinct Ras effector pathways have been defined (Malumbres and Barbacid 2003). Furthermore, none of the Ras effector pathways are simply linear cascades, and many are subject to feedback inhibition. The precise role of feedback inhibition and, importantly, the functional consequences of losing feedback inhibition have not been well studied. Here we demonstrate a critical role for one feedback inhibitor—Spry-2—in modulating both the developmental and tumor phenotype associated with an oncogenic K-ras mutation. These results provide a paradigm for the regulation of oncogenic Ras signaling by Spry proteins and other feedback inhibitors. Negative feedback signaling in development In this study, we show that endogenous expression of oncogenic K-ras induces a profound defect in lung branching morphogenesis. This defect appears to be largely mediated by up-regulation of Spry-2, based on our ability to significantly suppress the defect by Spry-2 knockdown or knockout. The underlying mechanism most likely involves aberrant MAPK suppression and/or localization within the developing lung. MAPK activation has been shown to be required for branching morphogenesis of tubular epithelium, such as lung and kidney (Fisher et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2004). Moreover, based on studies in a three-dimensional culture system, the distribution of MAPK activation appears to be important for driving lung bud morphogenesis, with highest MAPK activity localized to the distal tips of endodermal buds (Liu et al. 2004). Consistent with this notion, fetal lungs expressing oncogenic K-ras demonstrate uniform expression of phosphoMAPK and markedly defective branching (Fig. 5E The molecular mechanisms by which Spry proteins antagonize Ras/MAPK signaling are complex and highly dependent on cellular context. Based on numerous gain- and loss-of-function studies, Spry proteins are capable of intercepting the Ras/MAPK pathway at multiple levels, from RTK to Raf activation. Additionally, although well established as negative modulators of RTK signaling, in certain mammalian contexts, Spry proteins fail to inhibit and may even potentiate EGFR signaling (Kim and Bar-Sagi 2004). In the setting of endogenous oncogenic K-ras, Spry-2 can clearly inhibit MAPK activation, as knockdown of Spry-2 in K-rasG12D fetal lungs results in increased phosphoMAPK (Fig. 6E,F Several findings suggest that other feedback inhibitors in addition to Spry-2 likely play an important role in regulating oncogenic K-ras signaling in development. First, oncogenic activation of K-ras in embryonic fibroblasts induces up-regulation of Spry-1, Spry-2, and Spry-4 (Fig. 5B Modeling human developmental disorders in the mouse In mammalian development, germline Ras mutations result in complex genetic syndromes. Mice harboring a germline mutation in K-ras display several features that overlap with the cognate human disorders, including congenital heart defects and blood disorders. However, mutant mice also exhibit unique defects in placental and lung development, neither of which has yet been reported in patients. This discordance in phenotype likely reflects the strength of the gain-of-function K-ras allele, with oncogenic G12 mutations conferring higher-level constitutive activation than the V14 or T58 substitutions identified in Noonan syndrome (Schubbert et al. 2006). While strong gain-of-function H-ras mutations are present in Costello syndrome (Aoki et al. 2005), the unique features of the K-rasG12D phenotype may be due to differences in isoform expression and/or subcellular localization. Of note, few to no studies have actually examined the placentas or lungs of individuals with germline Ras mutations, raising the possibility of uncharacterized, subclinical defects. Whether negative feedback pathways are activated in these diseases and play a role in their pathogenesis remains to be determined. Tumor suppression by feedback inhibition Our data indicate that Spry-2 functions as a tumor suppressor in K-ras-driven lung cancer. This finding is consistent with several recent studies reporting down-regulation of Spry genes in breast, prostate, and liver cancer. In the case of prostate cancer, the degree of Spry-2 down-regulation correlates with the invasiveness of the lesions, as well as with methylation status, suggesting epigenetic as opposed to mutational inactivation (McKie et al. 2005). In addition, forced expression of Spry proteins inhibits the growth and metastatic potential of a variety of cancer cell lines (for review, see Lo et al. 2006). Interestingly, in melanoma cell lines harboring the activating B-Raf V599E mutation, Spry-2 is up-regulated relative to wild-type B-Raf melanomas; however, Spry-2 acts as a tumor suppressor only in the wild-type melanomas (Tsavachidou et al. 2004). These findings suggest that the tumor-suppressive function of Spry proteins is very dependent on tumor context. The mechanism of lung tumor suppression by Spry-2 is likely related to MAPK antagonism and inhibition of tumor proliferation. However, recent data also point to an alternative mechanism of tumor suppression, namely, induction of oncogene-induced senescence (Serrano et al. 1997; Lin et al. 1998). This cellular response has been most extensively studied in cultured cells, but has recently been confirmed in precancerous lesions from both mice and humans. While early studies suggested that senescence is mediated by sustained hyperactivation of Ras/MAPK signaling, one recent study proposes that the global suppression of Ras signaling pathways, in part through induction of Spry proteins, triggers the senescent response (Courtois-Cox et al. 2006). Of note, this study used NF1 knockdown and B-raf mutant cells, but not cells expressing endogenous, oncogenic K-ras. We have shown that a similar negative feedback program is also induced in MEFs expressing endogenous K-rasG12D, yet these cells clearly do not undergo senescence (Tuveson et al. 2004). Thus, the role of negative feedback pathways as a general mechanism underlying oncogene-induced senescence requires further study and validation. Future efforts will focus on determining whether Spry proteins function as lung tumor suppressors by simply restraining excessive cellular proliferation or by enabling the senescence program. Materials and methods Mouse strains The LSL-K-rasG12D strain was interbred to Prm-Cre (O’Gorman et al. 1997), Mox2-Cre (Tallquist and Soriano 2000), Tie2-Cre (Jackson Laboratories), and SP-C/rtTA;(tetO)7-Cre mice (Perl et al. 2002). Mox2-Cre and Tie2-Cre transgenics were crossed to R26-LSL-LacZ mice (Jackson Laboratories) to determine patterns of Cre expression. LSL-K-rasG12D;Prm-Cre double mutants were crossed to Tie2-LacZ transgenics (Jackson Laboratories) to highlight vascular endothelial cells. LSL-K-rasG12D mice were also bred to Spry-2Fl/Fl and Spry-2+/− mice (Shim et al. 2005). Details of PCR genotyping reactions are available on request. Histology, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry Embryos were fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C and embedded in paraffin. Serial (5-μm) sections were cut and H&E-stained. Immunofluorescence staining of tissues was performed essentially as described (Jackson et al. 2001) using antibodies directed against SP-C (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and β-tubulin (Sigma). For standard IHC analysis, paraffin-embedded tissue was deparaffinized and unmasked using microwave heating in 0.01 M Na citrate buffer. The antibodies used were BrdU (BD Biosciences), phospho-histone H3 (Upstate Biotechnology), phosphoErk1/2 (Cell Signaling), cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling), CC10 (gift from A. Mukherjee, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and CGRP (Peninsula Laboratories). For BrdU analysis, pregnant females were injected IP with 30 μg/g body weight, and embryos were collected 1 h later. For phosphoErk staining of embryonic lungs, lungs were fixed in 4% PFA for 2–4 h at 4°C, frozen in OCT, and serially sectioned in their entirety (10 μm). Unmasking was performed with 0.02% trypsin for 5 min at room temperature. The M.O.M. Immunodetection Kit (Vector Laboratories) was used together with mouse monoclonal anti-phosphoErk1/2 antibody (Sigma). To detect phosphoErk, biotinylated secondary antibody was used, followed by Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated streptavidin (Invitrogen). In situ hybridization In situ hybridization analyses of frozen sections were performed as previously described. Spry probes were prepared from plasmids containing the complete protein region and 3′ untranslated region (UTR) (Minowada et al. 1999). Whole-mount in situ hybridization of fetal lungs was performed as described (Wilkinson 1992). The probes used were Bmp4 (Jones et al. 1991), Shh (Echelard et al. 1993), and Fgf10 (Bellusci et al. 1997). Hematopoietic progenitor assays See the Supplemental Material. Lung branching morphogenesis in vitro Lungs were isolated from E11.5 and E12.5 embryos and transferred to polyester membranes (3 μm pore size) in six-well tissue culture plates (Costar). Lungs were cultured at 37°C at the air–liquid interface over serum-free BGJb media (Invitrogen) supplemented with pen/strep, gln, and 0.20 mg/mL ascorbic acid (Sigma). Branching was monitored daily for up to 72 h. ES cells ES cell lines were derived from blastocysts produced by crossing LSL-K-rasG12D mice with Prm-Cre transgenics, as well as with SPC-rtTA;(tetO)7-Cre double transgenics. Blastocysts were explanted onto irradiated feeders and grown in ES medium with 50 μM PD98059 (Cell Signaling). Multiple (two to four) independent lines were obtained of the following genotypes: wild-type, K-rasG12D; Prm-Cre, and LSL-K-rasG12D;SPC-rtTA;(tetO)7-Cre. Cloning, design, and sequence of shRNAs shRNAs were designed using the pSico-Oligomaker 1.5 (developed by A. Ventura), which is freely available at http://web.mit.edu/ccr/labs/jacks/protocols/pSico.html. Conditional knockdowns were generated by cloning shRNAs into pSico as described (Ventura et al. 2004). The sequence of the Spry-2 shRNA is 5′-GCCGGGTTGTCGTTGTAAA-3′ and corresponds to nucleotides 1150–1168 of mSpry-2. The specificity of Spry-2 knockdown was confirmed by immunoblotting of whole-cell lysates with anti-Spry-1, anti-Spry-2, and anti-Spry-4 antibodies. Lentiviral infection of ES cells Lentiviral vectors encoding shRNAs were cotransfected with packaging vectors into 293T cells as described (Rubinson et al. 2003). Supernatant was collected after ~36 h and incubated with ES cells in single-cell suspensions. After 6 h at 37°C, infected ES cells were washed and replated onto irradiated feeders in fresh ES medium. After 3–4 d, single GFP-positive clones were picked, expanded, and genotyped to confirm lentiviral integration. Tetraploid complementation See the Supplemental Material. Western blot analysis and Ras-GTP assay Whole-cell lysates were prepared and immunoblotted as described (Tuveson et al. 2004). The antibodies used were Spry-2 (Abcam), Spry-1 and Spry-4 (Zymed), phospho- and total Erk1/2 (Cell Signaling), β-tubulin (Sigma), and actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Ras-GTP was precipitated with Raf-GST and assessed according to the directions of the manufacturer (Upstate Biotechnology). Lung tumor induction and analysis Compound mutants were generated on a mixed 129/sv/FVBn background. Mice were infected with Ad-Cre as described (Jackson et al. 2001) and sacrificed after 6 mo. Lungs were isolated, fixed, and processed as described (Jackson et al. 2005). Lung and tumor areas were determined using Bioquant Image Analysis software in manual measurement mode. Acknowledgments We thank J. Whitsett for the SPC-rtTA;tetOCre mice, G. Minowada for the Spry-2−/− and Spry2Fl/Fl mice, S. O’Gorman for the Prm-Cre mice, and P. Soriano for the Mox2-Cre mice. We are very grateful to B. Hogan, E. Rawlins, Y. Liu, and B. Yu for discussion and technical advice, and A. Ventura for help with designing and cloning shRNAs. This work was supported by grants from the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation to A.T.S. (DRG-100-04), and from the NCI to A.T.S. (5K08CA111634-2) and T.J. (5-UO1-CA84306-06). A portion of this work was supported by Cancer Center Support (Core) grant P30-CA14051. T.J. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Footnotes Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1526207 References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Cancer Res. 1989 Sep 1; 49(17):4682-9.
[Cancer Res. 1989]Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Jun; 3(6):459-65.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2003 Aug; 4(2):111-20.
[Cancer Cell. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Genes Dev. 1997 Oct 1; 11(19):2468-81.
[Genes Dev. 1997]EMBO J. 2002 Mar 1; 21(5):1021-30.
[EMBO J. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar; 21(5):1444-52.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Nat Genet. 2005 Oct; 37(10):1038-40.
[Nat Genet. 2005]Nat Genet. 2006 Mar; 38(3):294-6.
[Nat Genet. 2006]Science. 2006 Mar 3; 311(5765):1287-90.
[Science. 2006]Nat Genet. 2006 Mar; 38(3):331-6.
[Nat Genet. 2006]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23; 94(26):14602-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15; 15(24):3243-8.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 1; 94(7):3058-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Biol Reprod. 1991 Feb; 44(2):327-31.
[Biol Reprod. 1991]Genesis. 2000 Feb; 26(2):113-5.
[Genesis. 2000]Nature. 2003 Feb 27; 421(6926):942-7.
[Nature. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Development. 1998 Nov; 125(22):4359-67.
[Development. 1998]Blood. 2003 Dec 1; 102(12):3938-46.
[Blood. 2003]Blood. 2006 Sep 15; 108(6):2041-4.
[Blood. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6; 99(16):10482-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Development. 1991 Dec; 113(4):1093-104.
[Development. 1991]Dev Biol. 1993 Apr; 156(2):426-43.
[Dev Biol. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6; 99(16):10482-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Cancer Cell. 2003 Aug; 4(2):111-20.
[Cancer Cell. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Development. 1999 Oct; 126(20):4465-75.
[Development. 1999]Trends Cell Biol. 2006 Jan; 16(1):45-54.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2006]Cancer Cell. 2003 Aug; 4(2):111-20.
[Cancer Cell. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Development. 2001 Nov; 128(21):4329-38.
[Development. 2001]Curr Biol. 2004 May 25; 14(10):897-905.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6; 99(16):10482-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 13; 101(28):10380-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Nature. 2001 Apr 26; 410(6832):1111-6.
[Nature. 2001]Dev Cell. 2005 Apr; 8(4):553-64.
[Dev Cell. 2005]Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15; 15(24):3243-8.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Jun; 3(6):459-65.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2003]Development. 2001 Nov; 128(21):4329-38.
[Development. 2001]Curr Biol. 2004 May 25; 14(10):897-905.
[Curr Biol. 2004]J Biol. 2006; 5(5):14.
[J Biol. 2006]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jun; 5(6):441-50.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2002 Feb 1; 277(5):3195-201.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Nat Cell Biol. 2003 May; 5(5):427-32.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2003]Dev Cell. 2005 Dec; 9(6):831-42.
[Dev Cell. 2005]Cancer Cell. 2006 Dec; 10(6):459-72.
[Cancer Cell. 2006]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Jan 26; 352(4):896-902.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007]Nat Genet. 2006 Mar; 38(3):331-6.
[Nat Genet. 2006]Nat Genet. 2005 Oct; 37(10):1038-40.
[Nat Genet. 2005]Oncogene. 2005 Mar 24; 24(13):2166-74.
[Oncogene. 2005]Cancer Lett. 2006 Oct 28; 242(2):141-50.
[Cancer Lett. 2006]Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15; 64(16):5556-9.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Cell. 1997 Mar 7; 88(5):593-602.
[Cell. 1997]Genes Dev. 1998 Oct 1; 12(19):3008-19.
[Genes Dev. 1998]Cancer Cell. 2006 Dec; 10(6):459-72.
[Cancer Cell. 2006]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23; 94(26):14602-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Genesis. 2000 Feb; 26(2):113-5.
[Genesis. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6; 99(16):10482-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Dev Cell. 2005 Apr; 8(4):553-64.
[Dev Cell. 2005]Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15; 15(24):3243-8.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Development. 1999 Oct; 126(20):4465-75.
[Development. 1999]Development. 1991 Feb; 111(2):531-42.
[Development. 1991]Cell. 1993 Dec 31; 75(7):1417-30.
[Cell. 1993]Development. 1997 Dec; 124(23):4867-78.
[Development. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 13; 101(28):10380-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Nat Genet. 2003 Mar; 33(3):401-6.
[Nat Genet. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr; 5(4):375-87.
[Cancer Cell. 2004]Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15; 15(24):3243-8.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 15; 65(22):10280-8.
[Cancer Res. 2005]