![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Subunit Interaction Determines IKs Participation in Cardiac Repolarization and Repolarization Reserve From the Cardiac Bioelectricity and Arrhythmia Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Mo. Correspondence to Yoram Rudy, PhD, Campus Box 1097, Whitaker Hall, Room 290, Washington University in St Louis, One Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130-4899. E-mail rudy/at/wustl.edu The publisher's final edited version of this article is available free at Circulation. This article has been corrected. See the correction in volume 120 on page 84. See commentary "Protecting the heart against arrhythmias: potassium current physiology and repolarization reserve." in Circulation, volume 112 on page 1376. See commentary "Protecting the heart against arrhythmias: potassium current physiology and repolarization reserve." in Circulation, volume 112 on page 1376. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Background The role of IKs, the slow delayed rectifier K+ current, in cardiac ventricular repolarization has been a subject of debate. Methods and Results We develop a detailed Markov model of IKs and its α-subunit KCNQ1 and examine their kinetic properties during the cardiac ventricular action potential at different rates. We observe that interaction between KCNQ1 and KCNE1 (the β-subunit) confers kinetic properties on IKs that make it suitable for participation in action potential repolarization and its adaptation to rate changes; in particular, the channel develops an available reserve of closed states near the open state that can open rapidly on demand. Conclusions Because of its ability to form an available reserve, IKs can function as a repolarization reserve when IKr, the rapid delayed rectifier, is reduced by disease or drug and can prevent excessive action potential prolongation and development of arrhythmogenic early afterdepolarizations. Keywords: action potentials, electrophysiology, ion channels Mutations to the cardiac potassium channel gene KCNQ1 (KvLQT1) have been linked to the long QT syndrome LQT1, which predisposes patients to arrhythmia during exercise and emotional stress, conditions that involve high levels of β-adrenergic stimulation. KCNQ1 is a 6-transmembrane domain protein that can form functional homomeric potassium channels and can also coassemble with the single transmembrane domain protein KCNE1 (MinK).1 Together these gene products reconstitute the IKs channel. Mutations to KCNE1 have also been linked to LQT (LQT5).2 In addition, transmural heterogeneity of IKs expression in ventricular myocardium gives rise to mid-myocardial cells (M cells) with a longer action potential (AP) duration (APD) and greater APD rate adaptation than epicardial or endocardial cells in many species.3 IKs is also augmented by β-adrenergic stimulation,4 suggesting its important role in mediating cardiac electrophysiological response. These findings suggest that IKs is important for AP repolarization and APD adaptation to changes in rate, as demonstrated in guinea pig.5–7 However, IKs density has been reported to be much lower in larger mammals, specifically in canine and human ventricle.8 In canine myocytes, L-type calcium current, an inward depolarizing current, has been shown to mediate APD rate adaptation under control conditions without β-adrenergic effects.7 However, AP repolarization requires a sufficient outward repolarizing current during phases 2 and 3 of the AP. Such current is carried by IKr (the rapid delayed rectifier) and IKs, with IKr playing a primary role in large mammals under normal physiological conditions and in the absence of β-adrenergic stimulation. Because phases 2 and 3 depend on a delicate balance between inward and outward currents, one cannot rule out a priori an important role for IKs. Moreover, the arrhythmic consequences of LQT1 and LQT52 mutations, the existence of only 2 repolarizing currents (IKr and IKs) that constitute the delayed rectifier, and incorporation of the β-adrenergic signaling molecules into the IKs channel complex4 strongly suggest an important role for IKs in human heart electrophysiology under various conditions. It has been hypothesized that in large mammals IKs constitutes a “repolarization reserve” (RR) that compensates for reductions in other repolarizing currents, in particular IKr, caused by mutations (hereditary LQT2) or drugs (acquired LQT syndrome).9,10 There is growing consensus that in the absence of RR, certain drugs such as sotalol (antiarrhythmic), erythromycin (anti-infective), chlorpromazine (antipsychotic), and methadone can trigger a life-threatening arrhythmia.9 The possibility of IKs generating this reserve and the dependence of IKs participation on its kinetics remain to be elucidated. In the present study we examine the hypothesis that IKs can participate in AP repolarization because of kinetic properties conferred by interaction between its KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits. We present detailed, experimentally based Markov models of KCNQ1 and IKs and examine their kinetic behavior during the AP at slow and fast rates. By comparing KCNQ1 behavior with IKs, we isolate the effect of the modulatory KCNE1 subunit on the AP. Results show that because of its kinetic properties, IKs can create an available reserve (AR) of channels at fast rates that can open and generate a larger repolarizing current. In the presence of IKr block, this AR prevents excessive APD prolongation and the formation of arrhythmogenic early afterdepolarizations (EADs). Such properties are not present in homomeric KCNQ1 channels and therefore require interaction with KCNE1. The AR concept relates to reserve within a single channel, thereby extending the RR concept that involves compensation for one repolarizing current by another. Methods Markov models of KCNQ1 and IKs are derived from experimental data and published K+ channel models.11,12 Koren et al11 described the K+ delayed rectifier RCK1 with a Markov model of 4 independent voltage sensor transitions and 1 cooperative voltage-independent transition before the open state. Zagotta et al12 expanded this model to study Shaker K+ channels by assuming that each voltage sensor undergoes 2 conformational changes before channel opening and successfully reproduced delayed activation (sigmoidal activation). A delay of several milliseconds has also been observed for KCNQ113 and IKs activation,14 suggesting that at least 2 voltage sensor transitions occur before channel opening. Experiments (J. Cui, PhD, personal communication, November 2004) also suggest a voltage-independent transition immediately before the first IKs open state, as proposed by Koren et al11 for RCK1. The Markov schemes we developed for KCNQ1 and IKs are shown in Figure 1A and 1B
The KCNQ1 model is based on frog oocyte recordings13 (Figure 2
Lu et al15 have recorded E-4031 insensitive current (IKs) in guinea pig ventricular myocytes at 37°C for [K+]o=5.4 mmol/L and [Na+]o=143 mmol/L (Figure 3A
Human IKs activation kinetics (Figure 3C Markov models for INa, IKr (updated version), and IKs were inserted in the Luo-Rudy (LRd) model of the guinea pig ventricular cell. AP simulation conditions are discussed in the online-only Data Supplement. Results KCNQ1 Model Validation and Current Properties The KCNQ1 model (Figure 1A Next, the triple-pulse protocol (Figure 2C, 2D Finally, the dependence of deactivation time constant and relative inactivation (defined in the online-only Data Supplement) on pulse duration are simulated. KCNQ1 deactivation rate varies with pulse duration. As channels enter open states that are farther from the closed states, the rate of entry back into the closed states (τdeact) is slowed (Figure 2F In contrast to rapid inactivation during the third pulse (above), a single depolarizing pulse from −80 mV to 20 mV results in slow onset of inactivation (>200 ms pulse duration needed to elicit hook in tail current; Figure 2E IKs Model Validation and Current Properties The IKs model resembles the KCNQ1 model closely, with the number of open-state transitions truncated and inactivation removed (Figure 1 The first voltage sensor position is more stable for human IKs than KCNQ1 (C1 occupancy is ≈9 times greater at −80 mV), resulting in slower activation and a continuous current increase even after a 5-second pulse to 60 mV. Once channels transition into O1, they rapidly enter O2 (at 40 mV, the rate into O2 is 6.6 times faster than C15 to O1). The presence of 2 open states allows for simultaneous reproduction of fast activation, steady state current-voltage relationship, and slow deactivation by facilitating slow deactivation without requiring slow activation to reproduce the steady state current. IKs Role in Rate Adaptation of APD Simulated whole-cell APs computed with the guinea pig IKs Markov model are shown at fast and slow pacing rates (Figure 4A IKs mediation of adaptation is a result of its closed-state transitions rather than its open-state accumulation. Figure 4C and 4D AP clamp experiments have measured IKs conductance (gKs) during the AP at fast and slow rates, showing that open-state accumulation is minimal (Figure 5 Human IKs activates more slowly than guinea pig IKs and deactivates more rapidly (Figure 3C
IKs and KCNQ1 During IKr Block Figure 7A
When a pause is simulated after 40 beats in the presence of IKr block (Figure 7B Discussion We show that interaction of KCNQ1 with the β-subunit KCNE1 to form IKs alters kinetics so that an AR is created at fast pacing rates. In contrast to KCNQ1, which does not generate a significant AR, IKs causes greater APD adaptation and protects against EADs when IKr is reduced. The AR concept can be examined experimentally. For example, a gapped double-pulse protocol with variation in the gap width could be used to characterize the AR in both guinea pig and human ventricular myocytes. In this protocol, a depolarizing pulse to 40 mV for 2 seconds would activate the channel. This step would then be followed by a repolarizing step of variable duration (from 10 ms to 1 second) to −80 mV so that the channel could partially deactivate. A second depolarizing pulse to 40 mV would be used to measure the rate of activation, providing a measure of the AR. Our simulations also predict that IKs will increase more at fast rates when IKr is blocked (Figure 7 At fast rates, the ability of guinea pig IKs to accumulate between APs allows it to participate in APD shortening. However, in human myocytes IKs deactivates rapidly, bringing into question its ability to accumulate and mediate APD adaptation. Our simulations show that open-state accumulation is not necessary for IKs to increase at fast rates. Because of the complex nature of potassium channel activation, channels can accumulate in closed states near the open states (zone 1) to form an AR that opens rapidly and generates large IKs current during AP repolarization. This effect is confirmed by AP clamp experiments16 that show little accumulation in the open state but rapid activation at fast rates (Figure 5 This novel mechanism of adaptation contrasts with the behavior of homomeric KCNQ1 channels that accumulate in the open states because of slow deactivation but show no significant AR. Consequently, the KCNQ1 AP does not adapt as much as the IKs AP (Figure 6 As stated earlier in this report, IKs is not likely to participate in rate adaptation in large mammals under control conditions.7 However, when IKr is reduced, IKs is the only remaining major repolarizing current. The guinea pig myocyte provides a natural electrophysiological environment in which IKr is reduced. Under these conditions, we show that human IKs can mediate rate adaptation when the maximum conductance of the current is increased (Figure 6 In the case of pathologically reduced IKr (by a mutation or a drug), outward currents carried by other channels (RR) can prevent excessive APD prolongation, EADs, and triggered activity. It is hypothesized that IKr reduction in conjunction with a compromised RR is a precursor to arrhythmia, especially after a pause.9 To test the ability of IKs to participate in the RR, we compared IKs with KCNQ1 accumulation under control conditions and with IKr block. During pacing, IKs displays greater accumulation than KCNQ1 and increases further when IKr is reduced (Figure 7A We describe IKs with 2 transitions, a slow transition (to zone 1) followed by a fast transition (to open), which implies that a 2-closed-state model (rather than 15 states) representing lumped voltage sensor transitions could adequately describe IKs activation. However, this model would not reproduce the experimentally observed delay before activation,14,19 which has important consequences during the AP. To reproduce these kinetics, a semi-Markov 2-closed-state model could be used that would introduce a memory property to the channel via time-dependent transition rates. Such models have been proposed20 but introduce another level of complexity with the addition of memory. The present model was chosen because of its correlation to the tetrameric symmetry of K+ channels and the simplicity of 4 transitions without memory that describe IKs activation. This detailed description of activation, in particular the delay before activation, is a channel feature that has not previously been incorporated into an IKs model. Model parameters were determined with the use of nonlinear optimization. Although we incorporated a large set of experiments, there may be different parameters that also reproduce channel properties. Our conclusions depend on the participation of numerous closed states in IKs activation. The necessity of these states for generating a delay before activation has been rigorously documented.19 Thus, any model of this topology (Figure 1 Not all data were obtained from native myocytes. For KCNQ1, we used frog oocyte experiments13 conducted at room temperature, in which transition rates differ from body temperature. Still, KCNQ1 activation in mammalian cells (37°C)1 and in oocytes (25°C) is quite similar, with 2 time constants of activation and similar current-voltage relationships. Future work should incorporate β-adrenergic modulation of IKs and study its effects on whole-cell electrophysiological function. To accomplish this, a β-adrenergic model that simulates its effects on many cellular processes is necessary; these processes include sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium handling, ICa,L, the transient outward Cl− current (Ito,2), INa, INaCa, IKs, and IK1. To date there have been attempts to create such a model,21,22 but a sufficiently complete model that allows accurate study of AP dynamics in the context of β-adrenergic stimulation awaits development. Appendix Click here to view.(193K, pdf) Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R01-HL49054 and R37-HL33343 (Dr Rudy) and F31-HL68318 (Dr Silva). Dr Rudy is the Fred Saigh Distinguished Professor of Engineering. We thank J. Cui, T. Hund, G. Faber, K. Decker, and T. O’Hara for helpful discussions and M. Sanguinetti for KCNQ1 data. References 1. Sanguinetti MC, Curran ME, Zou A, Shen J, Spector PS, Atkinson DL, Keating MT. Coassembly of K(V)LQT1 and minK (IsK) proteins to form cardiac I(Ks) potassium channel. Nature. 1996;384:80–83. [PubMed] 2. Splawski I, Tristani-Firouzi M, Lehmann MH, Sanguinetti MC, Keating MT. Mutations in the hminK gene cause long QT syndrome and suppress IKs function. Nat Genet. 1997;17:338–340. [PubMed] 3. Antzelevitch C, Dumaine R. Electrical heterogeneity in the heart: physiological, pharmacological and clinical implications. In: Page E, Fozzard H, Solaro J, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Section 2: The Cardiovascular System, Volume I: The Heart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002. pp. 654–692. 4. Marx SO, Kurokawa J, Reiken S, Motoike H, D’Armiento J, Marks AR, Kass RS. Requirement of a macromolecular signaling complex for beta adrenergic receptor modulation of the KCNQ1-KCNE1 potassium channel. Science. 2002;295:496–499. [PubMed] 5. Sicouri S, Quist M, Antzelevitch C. Evidence for the presence of M cells in the guinea pig ventricle. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:503–11. [PubMed] 6. Viswanathan PC, Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Effects of IKr and IKs heterogeneity on action potential duration and its rate dependence: a simulation study. Circulation. 1999;99:2466–2474. [PubMed] 7. Hund TJ, Rudy Y. Rate dependence and regulation of action potential and calcium transient in a canine cardiac ventricular cell model. Circulation. 2004;110:3168–3174. [PubMed] 8. Virag L, Iost N, Opincariu M, Szolnoky J, Szecsi J, Bogats G, Szenohradszky P, Varro A, Papp JG. The slow component of the delayed rectifier potassium current in undiseased human ventricular myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:790–797. [PubMed] 9. Roden DM. Drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1013–1022. [PubMed] 10. Volders PG, Stengl M, van Opstal JM, Gerlach U, Spatjens RL, Beekman JD, Sipido KR, Vos MA. Probing the contribution of IKs to canine ventricular repolarization: key role for beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Circulation. 2003;107:2753–2760. [PubMed] 11. Koren G, Liman ER, Logothetis DE, Nadal-Ginard B, Hess P. Gating mechanism of a cloned potassium channel expressed in frog oocytes and mammalian cells. Neuron. 1990;4:39–51. [PubMed] 12. Zagotta WN, Hoshi T, Aldrich RW. Shaker potassium channel gating, III: evaluation of kinetic models for activation. J Gen Physiol. 1994;103:321–362. [PubMed] 13. Tristani-Firouzi M, Sanguinetti MC. Voltage-dependent inactivation of the human K+ channel KvLQT1 is eliminated by association with minimal K+ channel (minK) subunits. J Physiol. 1998;510(pt 1):37–45. [PubMed] 14. Cui J, Kline RP, Pennefather P, Cohen IS. Gating of IsK expressed in Xenopus oocytes depends on the amount of mRNA injected. J Gen Physiol. 1994;104:87–105. [PubMed] 15. Lu Z, Kamiya K, Opthof T, Yasui K, Kodama I. Density and kinetics of I(Kr) and I(Ks) in guinea pig and rabbit ventricular myocytes explain different efficacy of I(Ks) blockade at high heart rate in guinea pig and rabbit: implications for arrhythmogenesis in humans. Circulation. 2001;104:951–956. [PubMed] 16. Rocchetti M, Besana A, Gurrola GB, Possani LD, Zaza A. Rate dependency of delayed rectifier currents during the guinea-pig ventricular action potential. J Physiol. 2001;534:721–732. [PubMed] 17. Kupershmidt S, Yang IC, Sutherland M, Wells KS, Yang T, Yang P, Balser JR, Roden DM. Cardiac-enriched LIM domain protein fhl2 is required to generate I(Ks) in a heterologous system. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;56:93–103. [PubMed] 18. Stengl M, Volders PG, Thomsen MB, Spatjens RL, Sipido KR, Vos MA. Accumulation of slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKs) in canine ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 2003;551:777–786. [PubMed] 19. Zagotta WN, Hoshi T, Dittman J, Aldrich RW. Shaker potassium channel gating, II: transitions in the activation pathway. J Gen Physiol. 1994;103:279–319. [PubMed] 20. Clay JR. A simple model of K+ channel activation in nerve membrane. J Theor Biol. 1995;175:257–262. [PubMed] 21. Zeng J, Rudy Y. Early afterdepolarizations in cardiac myocytes: mechanism and rate dependence. Biophys J. 1995;68:949–964. [PubMed] 22. Saucerman JJ, Brunton LL, Michailova AP, McCulloch AD. Modeling beta-adrenergic control of cardiac myocyte contractility in silico. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:47997–48003. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Nature. 1996 Nov 7; 384(6604):80-3.
[Nature. 1996]Nat Genet. 1997 Nov; 17(3):338-40.
[Nat Genet. 1997]Science. 2002 Jan 18; 295(5554):496-9.
[Science. 2002]J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Jun; 7(6):503-11.
[J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996]Circulation. 2004 Nov 16; 110(20):3168-74.
[Circulation. 2004]Cardiovasc Res. 2001 Mar; 49(4):790-7.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2001]Nat Genet. 1997 Nov; 17(3):338-40.
[Nat Genet. 1997]Science. 2002 Jan 18; 295(5554):496-9.
[Science. 2002]Neuron. 1990 Jan; 4(1):39-51.
[Neuron. 1990]J Gen Physiol. 1994 Feb; 103(2):321-62.
[J Gen Physiol. 1994]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]J Gen Physiol. 1994 Jul; 104(1):87-105.
[J Gen Physiol. 1994]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]Circulation. 2001 Aug 21; 104(8):951-6.
[Circulation. 2001]J Physiol. 2001 Aug 1; 534(Pt 3):721-32.
[J Physiol. 2001]Circulation. 1999 May 11; 99(18):2466-74.
[Circulation. 1999]Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Oct; 56(1):93-103.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2002]Cardiovasc Res. 2001 Mar; 49(4):790-7.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2001]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]J Gen Physiol. 1994 Jul; 104(1):87-105.
[J Gen Physiol. 1994]J Physiol. 2001 Aug 1; 534(Pt 3):721-32.
[J Physiol. 2001]J Physiol. 2001 Aug 1; 534(Pt 3):721-32.
[J Physiol. 2001]J Physiol. 2003 Sep 15; 551(Pt 3):777-86.
[J Physiol. 2003]Circulation. 2004 Nov 16; 110(20):3168-74.
[Circulation. 2004]N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 4; 350(10):1013-22.
[N Engl J Med. 2004]J Gen Physiol. 1994 Jul; 104(1):87-105.
[J Gen Physiol. 1994]J Gen Physiol. 1994 Feb; 103(2):279-319.
[J Gen Physiol. 1994]J Theor Biol. 1995 Jul 12; 175(2):257-62.
[J Theor Biol. 1995]J Gen Physiol. 1994 Feb; 103(2):279-319.
[J Gen Physiol. 1994]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]Nature. 1996 Nov 7; 384(6604):80-3.
[Nature. 1996]Biophys J. 1995 Mar; 68(3):949-64.
[Biophys J. 1995]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 28; 278(48):47997-8003.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Physiol. 1998 Jul 1; 510 ( Pt 1)():37-45.
[J Physiol. 1998]Circulation. 2001 Aug 21; 104(8):951-6.
[Circulation. 2001]Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Oct; 56(1):93-103.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2002]Cardiovasc Res. 2001 Mar; 49(4):790-7.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2001]J Physiol. 2001 Aug 1; 534(Pt 3):721-32.
[J Physiol. 2001]