• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plntphysLink to Publisher's site
Plant Physiol. Aug 2003; 132(4): 1755–1767.
PMCID: PMC181263

Convergent Responses to Stress. Solar Ultraviolet-B Radiation and Manduca sexta Herbivory Elicit Overlapping Transcriptional Responses in Field-Grown Plants of Nicotiana longiflora1,[w]


The effects of solar ultraviolet (UV)-B (280–315 nm) on plants have been studied intensively over the last 2 decades in connection with research on the biological impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion. However, the molecular mechanisms that mediate plant responses to solar (ambient) UV-B and their interactions with response mechanisms activated by other stressors remain for the most part unclear. Using a microarray enriched in wound- and insect-responsive sequences, we examined expression responses of 241 genes to ambient UV-B in field-grown plants of Nicotiana longiflora Cav. Approximately 20% of the sequences represented on the array showed differential expression in response to solar UV-B. The expression responses to UV-B had parallels with those elicited by simulated Manduca sexta herbivory. The most obvious similarities were: (a) down-regulation of several photosynthesis-related genes, and (b) up-regulation of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism and oxylipin biosynthesis such as HPL (hydroperoxide lyase), α-DIOX (alpha-dioxygenase), LOX (13-lipoxygenase), and AOS (allene oxide synthase). Genes encoding a WRKY transcription factor, a ferredoxin-dependent glutamate-synthase, and several other insect-responsive genes of unknown function were also similarly regulated by UV-B and insect herbivory treatments. Our results suggest that UV-B and caterpillar herbivory activate common regulatory elements and provide a platform for understanding the mechanisms of UV-B impacts on insect herbivory that have been documented in recent field studies.

UV-B induces multiple responses in terrestrial plants. These responses have been studied using a variety of experimental approaches, from controlled-environment experiments to large-scale field trials, and covering a broad spectrum of scales, from molecular to ecosystem level processes. Controlled-environment experiments have contributed most of the information presently available on responses at the molecular level. However, this type of experiment, particularly those that are based on the use of heavily unbalanced light sources (i.e. with unnaturally high ratios of UV-B to photosynthetically active radiation [PAR] or UV-B to UV-A [315–400 nm]), are frequently criticized on the grounds that they lack functional and ecological realism (Fiscus and Booker, 1995; Caldwell and Flint, 1997). It has been shown clearly that treatments with high UV-B to PAR ratios, which are the norm in controlled-environment exposures, tend to result in greatly exaggerated effects of UV-B on photosynthesis and growth inhibition. Because these effects have been hard to duplicate under field conditions, it is unclear to what extent the molecular and mechanistic data that have been produced under spectrally unbalanced conditions (which commonly involve PAR levels lower than 1:10 of full sunlight) contribute to our understanding of the normal physiological responses of plants to ambient UV-B stress. In fact, it has been clearly demonstrated that the level of PAR strongly modulates the effect of UV-B on the transcription of various photosynthetic genes: the higher the PAR, the smaller the UV-B-induced alteration in message abundance, which in several cases could be completely eliminated (Jordan et al., 1992; Strid et al., 1996).

Under field conditions, the inhibitory effect of ambient UV-B on the growth of herbaceous terrestrial plants seldom exceeds 20% (Ballaré et al., 1996, 2001; Krizek et al., 1998; Rousseaux et al., 2001). A much larger impact of solar UV-B has been documented for plant-herbivore interactions. Field experiments in a broad spectrum of ecosystems show that the intensity of insect herbivory frequently increases when the UV-B component of solar radiation is experimentally attenuated using filters (Bothwell et al., 1994; Ballaré et al., 1996; Rousseaux et al., 1998; Mazza et al., 1999b; Zavala et al., 2001). In some cases, at least part of this effect of solar UV-B could be attributed to direct behavioral responses of insects to UV-B photons (Mazza et al., 2002). However, insect growth and choice bioassays have demonstrated that UV-B effects on herbivory are in many cases indirect; i.e. mediated by UV-B-induced changes in plant tissues, which in turn affect insect feeding behavior and growth performance (Ballaré et al., 1996; Rousseaux et al., 1998; Mazza et al., 1999b; Zavala et al., 2001). The nature of these changes is unknown. Functional bioassays have detected significant effects of UV-B on plant tissue quality in the absence of any effect of UV-B on overall plant growth, total leaf nitrogen (N), tissue toughness, or lignin content (Ballaré et al., 1999; Zavala et al., 2001).

Plants often activate a battery of defense mechanisms in response to herbivore attack, which improve their chances of surviving further attacks by the same species or other species of herbivores (Karban and Baldwin, 1997). The molecules used in plant defense vary greatly across plant taxa but frequently include secondary compounds such as phenylpropanoids, alkaloids, and terpenes, and defense-related proteins such as proteinase inhibitors (PIs; for review, see Gatehouse, 2002). Oxylipins, including jasmonic acid (JA), produced through the octadecanoid pathway (Weber, 2002), are known to play a central role as signaling molecules mediating plant responses to insect herbivores, including production of PI and defense-related secondary metabolites (Ryan, 2000; Walling, 2000; Gatehouse, 2002). Interestingly, controlled-environment studies with Arabidopsis have shown that UV-B, delivered against a background of low PAR (approximately 1:10 of full sunlight), can trigger JA accumulation (A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1999). In tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), UV-B treatments did not result in increased JA levels (Stratmann et al., 2000b), but accumulation of PI in response to treatment with germicidal UV-C has been reported (Conconi et al., 1996). Stratmann et al. (2000b) concluded that UV-B/A treatments do not induce PI by themselves in tomato but can enhance the PI response induced by mechanical damage.

We wanted to determine whether the effects of solar UV-B on insect resistance in field-grown plants are mediated by the elicitation of defense responses similar to those induced by insect attack. As an initial step in this direction, we attempted to identify genes involved in the responses of field-grown plants of Nicotiana longiflora to solar UV-B using a custom-made cDNA microarray that contained approximately 250 Nicotiana attenuata genes known to be regulated in response to attack by chewing larvae of Manduca sexta (Halitschke et al., 2003). We first studied transcriptional differences between plants exposed to ambient UV-B and plants grown under filters that selectively attenuated the UV-B component of sunlight. We then compared the transcriptional responses to UV-B with those elicited by a simulated M. sexta herbivory treatment. Our results demonstrate a significant convergence in the transcriptional responses elicited by solar UV-B and insect attack and suggest that this convergence plays a functional role mediating the negative effects of ambient UV-B on herbivory intensity.


Experimental Design and Application of a cDNA Microarray to Study UV-B Impacts on Defense-Related Genes

The method used to array PCR fragments of insect-responsive N. attenuata genes onto epoxy-coated slides has been described (Halitschke et al., 2003). The arrays contained N. attenuata genes found to be differentially expressed in response to: (a) M. sexta herbivory (M. sexta-attacked plants versus intact controls, sampled 24 h after initiation of feeding) by differential display reverse transcription-PCR and subtractive hybridization techniques (Hermsmeier et al., 2001; Hui et al., 2003), and (b) M. sexta oral secretions and regurgitates (wounds treated with regurgitates versus wounded control, sampled 24 h after wounding) by cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (Halitschke et al., 2003). In addition, the array contained probes for well-characterized N. attenuata control genes implicated in plant defense: PI (proteinase [trypsin] inhibitor), HPL (hydroperoxide lyase), PMT1 (putrescine methyl transferase), AOS (allene oxide synthase), XET (xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase B1), and WRKY-2 (WRKY transcription factor; Halitschke et al., 2003). Each gene was represented on the microarray by two independent PCR fragments that, in turn, were spotted in quadruplicate (Halitschke et al., 2003). Independent tests of this microarray comparing wounded versus wounded +regurgitate-treated leaves (Halitschke et al., 2003) and M. sexta-attacked versus intact plants (C. Voelckel and I.T. Baldwin, unpublished data) yielded gene expression patterns that were highly consistent with those detected using other differential expression techniques, thereby establishing the reliability of the system.

For our field experiments, we used 5-week-old plants of N. longiflora, a wild species native to the central region of Argentina that is closely related to N. attenuata. The plants were grown in large, replicated plots for 3 weeks in a field site in Córdoba (Central Argentina) under near-ambient or attenuated solar UV-B radiation (see “Materials and Methods” for a description of the experimental layout and the growth conditions). At the time of harvest, plants were still at the rosette stage, and there were no obvious differences between UV-B treatments in overall plant growth or morphology, which is consistent with the results obtained in the field for other Solanaceous species exposed for short periods to similar UV-B treatments (Ballaré et al., 1996). One-half of the plants were exposed to a simulated herbivory treatment, in which leaves were gently wounded and the wounds treated with M. sexta regurgitate. This treatment (see “Materials and Methods” for details) is known to elicit transcriptional responses that are similar to those induced by M. sexta folivory (Hermsmeier et al., 2001; Schittko et al., 2001). Leaf samples were taken 24 h after the simulated herbivory treatment.

Solar UV-B Down-Regulates Several Photosynthetic Genes and Up-Regulates Genes Implicated in Biotic Defense Responses

Of the 241 M. sexta-responsive, regurgitate-responsive, and control genes included in the array, 48 revealed differential expression in response to solar UV-B in the field-grown plants of N. longiflora (Fig. 1; Table I; the complete data set is available as Supplemental Table I at http://www.plantphysiol.org). The genes included in the array were clustered into functional groups based on known or inferred function of the gene product. For many of the sequences, no functional information is available other than their transcript abundance is regulated in response to M. sexta herbivory or regurgitate treatment; therefore, they are likely to play some role in metabolic reconfiguration after insect attack. Those genes were included in two separate categories: M. sexta regulated and regurgitate responsive (see “Materials and Methods” for details).

Figure 1.
Effect of chronic exposure to ambient UV-B on the abundance of transcripts of insectresponsive genes in field-grown N. longiflora plants. Plants were grown in the field for 3 weeks in replicated plots under filters that were fully transparent to the ...
Table I.
Summary of the significant effects of solar UV-B exposure on gene expression in N. longiflora (see “Materials and Methods” for explanation of the criteria used to assess the significance of the expression changes)

The most consistent expression responses to solar UV-B were found in the clusters of photosynthesis- and fatty acid metabolism-related genes (Fig. 1; Table I). Most of the probes included in the array for genes that encode components of the photosynthetic apparatus indicated lower transcript abundance in plants chronically exposed to solar UV-B than in the control plants. Among these were genes for Calvin cycle enzymes, such as the small subunit of Rubisco, and genes encoding for PSII polypeptides (e.g. genes with similarity to the tomato lhbC1 gene for LHCII type III, spinach 6.1-kD polypeptide, and NtPII10). Interestingly, one photosynthesis-related gene, encoding a PSII-O2-evolving complex 23-kD polypeptide, was up-regulated in plants exposed to ambient UV-B (Table I).

In contrast to the response of photosynthesis-related transcripts, most of the probes for genes that encode enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism and oxylipin synthesis showed increased transcript abundance in plants exposed to solar UV-B. Among the up-regulated genes were α-DIOX, HPL, LOX, and AOS (Fig. 1; Table I).

A similar UV-B-induced increase in expression level was found for genes that encode enzymes directly or indirectly involved in N metabolism (such as the ferredoxin-dependent Glu-synthase [FDGS] and a molybdopterin synthase sulfurylase), and a gene encoding a WRKY-type transcription factor (WRKY-2). In contrast, exposure to solar UV-B reduced the abundance of PI transcripts and transcripts with similarity to the basic-type pathogenesis-related protein PR1 of tobacco. Solar UV-B also affected the abundance of several transcripts of unknown function that have been previously shown to be regulated by natural or simulated M. sexta herbivory and/or wounding + regurgitate treatment (Fig. 1; Table I).

Reproducibility of the UV-B Effect

We tested the generality of the UV-B impact by comparing the transcriptional responses shown in Figure 1 with those elicited in N. attenuata by realistic levels of UV-B provided against high PAR in a completely independent experiment under greenhouse conditions (see “Materials and Methods”).

The two experiments showed a similar pattern of UV-B response (Fig. 2). The most obvious parallels were: (a) very similar effects on the abundance of photosynthesis-related transcripts, and (b) similar up-regulation of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism and oxylipin synthesis and consistent effects on FDGS (up-regulation) and PR1 (down-regulation). The only remarkable difference between the expression patterns detected in these experiments was the positive effect of artificial UV-B on PI expression in N. attenuata, which contrasts with the reduction in PI transcript abundance in N. longiflora plants exposed to ambient UV-B (Fig. 2; see Supplemental Table I at http://www.plantphysiol.org). Analysis of the data presented in Figure 2 shows a highly significant correlation between the data sets (P < 0.0001 for a linear model; R2 = 0.29; or R2 = 0.50 if the PI data points are removed). This similar regulation in two Nicotiana spp., tested in completely independent experiments, provides strong evidence that the results presented in Figures Figures11 and and22 reflect a general pattern of transcriptional response to ambient or near-ambient UV-B doses.

Figure 2.
Comparison between the effects of solar UV-B in N. longiflora and simulated ambient UV-B in N. attenuata on the expression of insect-responsive genes. The data for N. longiflora were obtained from Figure 1. The data for N. attenuata were obtained ...

UV-B and Simulated M. sexta Herbivory Have Similar Effects on Various Functional Groups of Genes

To compare the effects of solar UV-B and insect herbivory, we applied a simulated-herbivory treatment to field-grown N. longiflora plants. For the treatment, we wounded the leaves with a fabric pattern wheel and applied to the wounds oral secretions collected from fourth instar M. sexta caterpillars. Twenty-four hours after elicitation, the leaves were harvested, and RNA was extracted for analysis.

The observed expression responses for well-characterized genes (small subunit of Rubisco gene and pseudogene, AOS, HPL, α-DIOX, PI, and WRKY-2; see Supplemental Table I at http://www.plantphysiol.org), which had been previously evaluated by extensive northern-blot analysis and polyLys microarrays (Hermsmeier et al., 2001; Ziegler et al., 2001; Hui et al., 2003; Voelckel and Baldwin 2003), were consistent with the previous results. The expression changes that we observed were also consistent with the responses detected with the polyepoxide microarray used in this study in N. attenuata plants exposed to 24-h M. sexta feeding (C. Voelckel and I.T. Baldwin, unpublished data). These similarities indicate that the expression responses to simulated herbivory measured in our experiments can be regarded as general and reproducible for Nicotiana spp.

Figure 3 shows direct comparisons of gene expression responses to solar UV-B and simulated herbivory in N. longiflora. The treatments had similar effects on various functional groups of genes (Fig. 3A). In the photosynthesis-related group, the same genes encoding for PSII polypeptides that were down-regulated by UV-B were also down-regulated by simulated herbivory. Probes for Rubisco also showed reduced transcript abundance in both treatments. Both treatments also resulted in increased abundance of transcripts of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism (α-DIOX, HPL, and AOS), although the simulated herbivory treatment had a stronger effect on the first two genes than UV-B exposure.

Figure 3.
Comparison between the effects of solar UV-B and a simulated caterpillar treatment in N. longiflora (for details, see “Materials and Methods”). The graph shows the responses to the simulated caterpillar treatment (wounding + M. sexta ...

Simulated herbivory, like solar UV-B, increased the abundance of WRKY-2 transcripts. Also, as expected from previous herbivore-challenged experiments (Hermsmeier et al., 2001) and consistent with the effect of UV-B, our simulated herbivory treatment increased the abundance of transcripts for FDGS and molybdopterin synthase sulfurylase. The effects of UV-B and simulated herbivory were also similar regarding the abundance of PR1 transcripts, which was reduced by both treatments (Fig. 3A; see Supplemental Table I at http://www.plantphysiol.org). Analysis of the data shown in Figure 3A shows a significant correlation between the responses to solar UV-B and simulated herbivory (P < 0.001 for a linear model; R2 = 0.22 when the PI data points are removed). There was also correspondence between the effects of solar UV-B and simulated herbivory on the class of genes defined as unknown function/M. sexta regulated (Fig. 3B; P = 0.004 for the linear model).

Few genes were affected in opposite directions by solar UV-B and simulated herbivory. This is indicated by the paucity of data points in the northwest and southeast quadrants of Figure 3, A and B. A noteworthy case of opposite response was PI, which was strongly up-regulated by simulated herbivory (as expected) and down-regulated by solar UV-B in N. longiflora. More cases of opposite responses were found among the genes known to be specifically responsive to components of M. sexta oral secretions and regurgitates (regurgitate-responsive genes; Fig. 3C).

Functional Effects of UV-B on Plant Defenses

Insect elicitation commonly results in increased plant resistance to subsequent herbivore attacks. This increased resistance can be measured using standardized insect growth bioassays, and in the particular case of M. sexta and N. attenuata, induction of plant defenses by caterpillar attack has been detected with bioassays within 24 h after the elicitation with JA (Pohlon and Baldwin, 2001) and feeding insects (A. Kessler and I.T. Baldwin, unpublished data). Because we had detected similarities in the transcriptional responses elicited by UV-B and simulated M. sexta herbivory (Fig. 3), we wondered whether the transcriptional reorganization induced by UV-B had detectable consequences at the functional level. We exposed N. longiflora and N. attenuata plants to simulated ambient UV-B in a greenhouse and measured the impacts of UV-B on: (a) the kinetics of PI induction by a wound + regurgitate treatment, and (b) the performance of first instar M. sexta caterpillars using a no-choice feeding bioassay.

Simulated herbivory induced higher PI activity in N. attenuata, as expected (Pohlon and Baldwin, 2001; van Dam et al., 2001). Interestingly, this induction was significantly enhanced by plant exposure to UV-B (Fig. 4). This is consistent with the fact that both UV-B and simulated herbivory up-regulated the PI gene in this species (Fig. 1). In N. longiflora, PI activity was approximately 10 times lower than in N. attenuata, and although detailed analysis revealed that they were slightly increased by the wound + regurgitate treatment (data not shown), we were not able to detect a significant effect of UV-B-promoting PI activity levels (Fig. 4). In fact, a (nonsignificant) reduction in PI levels was apparent in UV-B-exposed plants. Again, this was consistent with the microarray data, which showed down-regulation of PI in response to ambient UV-B in N. longiflora (Fig. 1).

Figure 4.
Effects of simulated ambient UV-B (greenhouse experiment) on the kinetics of PI activity changes in response to a simulated caterpillar treatment (wounding + M. sexta regurgitate) applied at time = 0 to N. longiflora and N. attenuata plants. PI activity ...

In the bioassay with both Nicotiana spp., insects fed on plants that were exposed to simulated-ambient UV-B before and during the experiment grew less rapidly than their counterparts fed on control plants (Fig. 5). Because the insects themselves were not exposed to UV-B during the feeding trials, it is clear that the growth differences reflected changes in plant tissue quality induced by UV-B.

Figure 5.
Effects of simulated ambient UV-B (greenhouse experiment) on the growth (weight gain) of M. sexta caterpillars. The experiment had a duration of 1 week. Bars indicate ±1 se (n = 10 [N. attenuata] and 8 [N. longiflora] replicate plants, each ...


Our data provide a first glimpse into the transcriptional changes activated by solar UV-B in fieldgrown plants. The comparison in Figure 3 indicates that ambient UV-B induces a transcriptional reorganization in N. longiflora that has parallels with the response induced by caterpillar herbivory. This result suggests that UV-B and chewing insects activate common regulatory elements and that this signaling convergence ultimately leads to increased plant resistance to herbivore attack in plants exposed to solar UV-B radiation (Fig. 5).

Signaling Interactions between Solar UV-B- and Herbivore-Induced Responses

Where do the UV-B- and caterpillar-induced signaling cascades converge? A major obstacle in the quest for answers to this question is our very limited understanding of the mechanisms of UV-B perception and signaling in plants. Dedicated photoreceptors for red, far-red, blue, and UV-A radiation are well characterized in plants; in contrast, no specific UV-B receptors have yet been identified. Based on evidence from studies in other organisms, some plant responses to UV-B are thought to be initiated by signals derived from UV-B-induced DNA damage (Beggs and Wellmann, 1994). However, spectral considerations (Ballaré et al., 1995; A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1996; Frohnmeyer et al., 1999), acclimation experiments (Kalbin et al., 2001), and studies with DNA repair mutants (Boccalandro et al., 2001) have suggested that at least some responses to UV-B are triggered by activation of other molecular targets besides DNA. In animal cells, activation of membrane receptors by UV-B is thought to be the initial step in the chain of molecular events that leads to the generation of some cellular responses to UV-B, such as apoptosis induced by exposures to high UV-B doses. Yalamanchili and Stratmann (2002) used suspension-cultured Lycopersicon peruvianum cells to test the possibility that UV-B activates membrane receptors for systemin, a small peptide involved in the initial steps of the wound response in tomato. Their experiments showed that pulses of UV-B are effective in eliciting two early components of the wound response: medium alkalization and phosphorylation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase (Stratmann et al., 2000a). Further pharmacological experiments indicated that the UV-B effect on these responses could be abrogated by treatment of the cells with suramin, an inhibitor of the systemin receptor, and Ala-17-systemin, a systemin analog that competitively inhibits the binding of systemin to its receptor. This evidence, coupled with reciprocal desensitization experiments that involved UV-B and systemin, led Yalamanchili and Stratmann (2002) to suggest that the systemin receptor and/or other systemin-responsive signaling elements are the initial photo-targets in the response to pulses of UV-B in L. peruvianum cells. In principle, this model may be compatible with our gene expression results in Nicotiana spp., which revealed a consistent effect of physiological levels of UV-B up-regulating genes that are known to be up-regulated in response to wounding (and systemin in the tomato model), such as those that encode enzymes involved in oxylipin synthesis (Ryan, 2000). Interestingly, the systemin receptor (SR 160) has been shown recently to be identical to the tBRI1 receptor (Montoya et al., 2002), suggesting that there also might be similarities to explore between UV-B and steroid hormone signaling.

Another potential point of overlap between UV-B- and herbivore-induced defense responses may occur at the level of the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Work in tomato seedlings has shown that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is generated systemically in response to wounding and systemin, and this response is absent in def-1, a mutant impaired in the octadecanoid pathway (Orozco-Cárdenas and Ryan, 1999). Feeding experiments using H2O2, free radical generators, and an NAPDH-oxidase inhibitor have suggested that H2O2 production by an NADPH-oxidase plays a key role in signaling events that lead to activation of defense genes, such as PI and PPO (polyphenol oxidase; Orozco-Cárdenas et al., 2001). UV-B can generate ROS in plant tissues (Malanga and Puntarulo, 1995; Hideg et al., 2000; Hideg et al., 2002), and it is tempting to speculate that this increased ROS production activates elements of the herbivore-induced response. In fact, convergence in the transcriptional responses elicited by artificial UV-B and oxidant agents (such as ozone), antioxidant inhibitors, and artificial ROS generators has been noted in controlled-environment experiments with other plant species (Willekens et al., 1994; Green and Fluhr, 1995; Rao et al., 1996; Surplus et al., 1998; A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1999, 2001; Sävenstrand et al., 2002). However, there are caveats with applying this interpretation to the N. longiflora case. First, it has not been established that physiological levels of UV-B induce elevated ROS levels in field-grown plants, although increases in activity of H2O2-scavenging enzymes (catalase and ascorbate peroxidase) due to solar UV-B exposure have been reported (Mazza et al., 1999a). Second, gene expression studies in the tomato model indicate that only the expression of “late” genes (i.e. PI and PPO) is H2O2 dependent, whereas the wound and systemin induction of the “early” genes (i.e. genes associated with the octadecanoid pathway, such as AOS and LOX) is H2O2 independent (Orozco-Cárdenas et al., 2001). This pattern of control appears to be opposite to the one detected in N. longiflora, where solar UV-B upregulated the “early” signal pathway genes but not the defense product, PI (Fig. 1).

As noted earlier, work on the Arabidopsis model also has provided evidence for interactions between UV-B and oxylipin signaling. UV-B, provided against backgrounds of low PAR, has been shown to induce the expression of the defensin gene (PDF1.2), a gene known to be up-regulated by wounding and JA (A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1999, 2001). The effects of UV-B on PDF1.2 could be cancelled by pretreatment of the plants with an antioxidant, ascorbic acid. Moreover, increased PDF1.2 expression could also be elicited by feeding the plants with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (an oxidant) in wild-type (Col4) plants, but not in the jar-1 mutant, which is impaired in jasmonate sensing. Based on this evidence, A.-H.-Mackerness et al. (1999) concluded that the UV-B effect on PDF1.2 expression was mediated by UV-B-induced ROS production, which, at variance with the current model for tomato (Orozco-Cárdenas et al., 2001), appeared to play a signaling role upstream of JA. It is also noteworthy that UV-B promotes JA accumulation in Arabidopsis (A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1999), whereas no effects of UV-B on JA levels could be detected in tomato (Stratmann et al., 2000b). A family of calmodulin-binding transcription factors (AtSR16 for Arabidopsis “signal-responsive” genes) that are induced by multiple internal regulators (ethylene and methyl jasmonate) and external factors (heat shock, cold, UV, NaCl, and wounding) has been characterized recently in Arabidopsis (Yang and Poovaiah, 2002). This family might be involved in the interactions between signaling pathways initiated by herbivory and ambient UV-B; however, none of the differential display techniques used to detect transcript regulated by M. sexta herbivory in N. attenuata revealed sequences with similarity to the SR Arabidopsis family.

Regardless of the precise way of interaction, our data suggest that one of the mechanisms whereby solar UV-B makes Nicotiana plants less suitable for insect consumers (Fig. 5) may be by supercharging the octadecanoid pathway, increasing the abundance of transcripts of oxylipin biosynthetic genes (Fig. 1). This effect of UV-B appears to result in higher PI accumulation upon herbivore attack in N. attenuata but not in N. longiflora (Fig. 4). N. longiflora produces very low PI levels, which suggests that other defense products, and not PI, are involved in UV-B- (and insect-) induced defenses in this species.

Responses of Other Functional Groups of Genes

Many of the effects of solar UV-B on transcript abundance detected in our experiments involved genes that have not been investigated before; therefore, comparisons with other studies are difficult to establish. Transcriptional responses to UV-B have been studied for several photosynthesis-related genes in controlled-environment experiments. In all cases, previous results with pea (A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1996, 1998; Brosché et al., 1999, 2002; Sävenstrand et al., 2002) and Arabidopsis (Surplus et al., 1998; A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1999, 2001) show down-regulation of this functional group, which is broadly consistent with our results for both Nicotiana spp. Notice, however, that in our experiments at least one of the arrayed probes for photosynthetic genes indicated up-regulation by exposure to solar UV-B (PSII-O2-evolving complex 23-kD polypeptide). Because photosynthetic gas exchange is normally not affected by chronic UV-B exposure in field-grown terrestrial plants (Allen et al., 1998), one has to interpret the transcriptional changes that we detected in Nicotiana spp. as part of an underlying acclimation response, which makes the photosynthetic apparatus more tolerant to UV-B-induced damage or frees up resources that are required for the activation of UV-B defenses.

There were also some apparent contrasts between the transcriptional responses to UV-B that we detected and those obtained in previous studies. In N. longiflora, we found down-regulation of PI in plants exposed to solar UV-B (Fig. 1). In tomato, PI expression increased in response to treatment with germicidal UV-C (Conconi et al., 1996) but not in response to UV-B (Stratmann et al., 2000b). Although these observations are not readily comparable, because different species and irradiation protocols have been used, it appears that up-regulation of PI cannot be regarded as a general response to physiological doses of UV-B. In fact, we obtained contrasting responses to similar UV-B levels in the two Nicotiana spp. used in our experiments (Fig. 2). In the same vein, the down-regulation of PR1 by UV-B in N. longiflora and N. attenuata (Figs. (Figs.11 and and2)2) was to some extent unexpected, given previous results showing upregulation of pathogenesis-related genes in tobacco and Arabidopsis plants exposed to: (a) artificial UV-B under low PAR backgrounds (Green and Fluhr, 1995; Thalmair et al., 1996; A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1998, 2001; Surplus et al., 1998), (b) treatments with germicidal UV-C (Yalpani et al., 1994), or (c) ozone fumigation (Ernst et al., 1992, 1996; Yalpani et al., 1994). UV-B-induced up-regulation of PR genes appears to be mediated by ROS (A.-H.-Mackerness et al., 1999, 2001); therefore, we suspect that increased PR expression is less likely to occur under field conditions than under experimental protocols that combine plants with a low antioxidant capacity (e.g. plants grown under low PAR) with treatments that generate large quantities of ROS. However, differential regulation of PR genes (e.g. differential induction of acidic and basic PR proteins by stress treatments) has been demonstrated (Brederode et al., 1991), and this may also explain the differences between our results and those reported for other systems.

Ecophysiological Considerations

From an ecophysiological point of view, it is to some extent puzzling that the effects of UV-B and caterpillar herbivory on certain functional categories of genes are so similar (Fig. 3). This is particularly true in the case of photosynthetic genes because the parallels between the challenges imposed by UV-B photons and herbivore attack on the photosynthetic machinery are far from obvious. The similar regulation by UV-B and simulated herbivory on genes for WRKY, FDGS, molybdopterin synthase sulfurylase, PR1, and on various transcripts of unknown function (Fig. 3) also resists facile explanations. One possibility is that this similarity is only apparent and that subtle differences in timing and relative changes in expression levels of key genes are of central importance to define the functional specificity of the transcriptional reorganization triggered by each particular stimulus (for discussion, see Bowler and Fluhr, 2000). However, a look at the end product of the UV-B response in Nicotiana spp., which is in fact an increased resistance to herbivore attack (Fig. 5), suggests that the functional specificity may be actually rather limited. It can be argued that the plant has only a limited number of signaling circuits and molecules available, and, because of that, redundancy or overlap in the responses initiated by different signals is, to some extent, unavoidable. On the other hand, it is also possible that the observed transcriptional convergence represents an evolutionary compromise between highly “stimulus-specific” responses and “multipurpose” responses that help the plant to cope with stress factors that, from the “plant's point of view,” are more similar than they appear from our reductionist perspective. For example, under natural conditions, exposure to full solar UV-B (e.g. in sunny canopy gaps) and exposure to folivore insects might pose some similar limitations to plant growth, which in turn demand similar re-accommodations of plant function (e.g. toward a more conservative use of resources). Examples of morphological and biochemical responses that might increase the resistance to high UV-B, and at the same time reduce the damage imposed by folivores, may include reduced investment in leaf area, production of thicker leaves, increased antioxidant levels, and increased levels of phenolic compounds. Last, it is possible that both UV-B and herbivore attack tend to co-occur in the habitats in which these species evolved and, hence, have selected for shared signaling pathways.


Seed Sources and Germination

Seeds of the native plant Nicotiana longiflora Cav. were collected from wild specimens growing near the La Falda lake, in the Punilla Valley (Córdoba, central Argentina) and sown directly on agar plates for germination. Nicotiana attenuata Torr. Ex W. (seven times inbred line of seeds collected from the DI Ranch, Section T40S R19W, Utah) seeds were soaked for 1 h in a GA3 (100 mm) + smoke solution (House of Herbs, Passaic, NJ; Baldwin et al., 1994) and germinated in agar plates. Seedlings were transplanted to individual 0.5-L pots filled with standard topsoil.

Plant Growth in Field Experiments

Our field experiments were located at the Dr. Miguel Culaciati Botanical Garden in Huerta Grande (31° south, Córdoba, central Argentina, within 5 km of the N. longiflora seed collection site). Seedlings were grown for 1 week in a greenhouse after transplanting, then transferred to the field plots and assigned to the experimental UV-B treatments. The individual pots were sunk into the recently cultivated soil of the plots to facilitate watering and avoid overheating of the root zone. There were three independent blocks of plants (replicates). During the period in the field (3 weeks), the plants were fertilized twice with 0.5 g of N:P:K per pot and watered twice daily to maintain the soil near field capacity. The experimental plants of N. longiflora were very similar in appearance to their wild relatives that occurred in moist areas near river banks or abandoned fields.

Plant Growth in Greenhouse Experiments

Seedlings (in individual 0.5-L pots) were grown for 4 weeks in a greenhouse in Buenos Aires (34° S), without supplemental lighting, and then transferred to the experimental UV-B treatments within the same greenhouse. There were three independent blocks of plants (replicates). During the period under the UV-B lamps (3 weeks), the plants were fertilized once with 0.5 g of N:P:K and watered daily to maintain the soil near field capacity. Peak PAR in the greenhouse was 1,400 μmol m2 s1; natural photoperiod varied between 12.5 and 13.5 h.

UV-B Treatments

In the field, the plants were grown in 1- × 1.4-m plots covered with clear plastic filters. The filters were of two types: clear polyester (Oeste Aislante, Buenos Aires; 0.1 mm thick), which filtered out more than 90% of the UV-B component of solar radiation (attenuated UV-B treatment); and “Stretch” film (Bemis Co., Minneapolis; 0.025 mm thick), which has very high transmittance in the UV-B region (near-ambient UV-B treatment). Both films have very high transmittance in the UV-A and PAR regions of the spectrum (for spectral scans and details, see Mazza et al., 2000). There were three filters for each experimental treatment. The field exposures were carried out during the summer season (January to February), which coincides with the period of peak growth in natural populations. To minimize natural herbivory on the experimental plants, the plots were surrounded with mosquito nets.

In the greenhouse, the plants were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: simulated ambient UV-B and no UV-B. UV-B radiation was obtained with three UVB 313 fluorescent lamps (Q-Panel) filtered through one 0.13-mm-thick layer of cellulose di-acetate (JVC Plastics, Lemirada, CA) to remove UV-C photons. In the no-UV-B treatment, the cellulose di-acetate film was replaced by a 0.1-mm clear polyester sheet (which filtered out both UV-C and UV-B). The cellulose di-acetate film was replaced every 4 d. The plants were irradiated for 6 h each day, with the irradiation period centered at solar noon. The biologically effective daily UV dose, calculated using the generalized plant action spectrum of Caldwell (1971) normalized at 300 nm, was 9.9 kJ m2. This dose is comparable with the natural UV-B doses that N. longiflora and N. attenuata plants experience during the summer solstice in their natural areas of distribution in Central Argentina and the southwestern United States, respectively. However, a direct comparison is difficult to establish because the output of our lamps was not modulated to follow the variation in natural PAR in the greenhouse; therefore, the UV-B to PAR ratios are likely to have exceeded the natural values during cloudy days and/or at the extremes of the 6-h daily irradiation periods. Inspection of the plants at the end of the irradiation period indicated that the treatment was effective in inducing significant accumulation of UV-absorbing sunscreens in the epidermis without causing marked growth inhibition (18% reduction in plant height; no obvious differences in leaf area; data not shown). Therefore, the simulated ambient UV-B treatment can be regarded as a reasonable approximation to natural UV-B exposure.

Simulated Herbivory Treatment

To simulate herbivore damage (microarray and PI determination experiments), three (third to fifth) fully expanded leaves of rosette stage plants of the attenuated UV-B plots were treated in all cases. Three rows of puncture wounds were created with a fabric pattern wheel on each side of the mid-vein and 20 μL per leaf of a 1:6 (v/v) dilution of Manduca sexta regurgitate collected from fourth instar caterpillars were applied to the fresh wounds (simulated caterpillar treatment).

RNA Isolation

Approximately 0.5 g of frozen tissue was ground in liquid N using a pestle and mortar. This was followed by the addition of 5 mL of extraction buffer (0.18 m Tris-HCl [pH 8.2], 0.09 m LiCl, 4.5 mm EDTA, and 1% [w/v] SDS) and 1.7 mL of phenol acid:chloroform (5:1 [v/v]). The frozen slurry was ground and then centrifuged (12,000g for 20 min at 4°C). The aqueous phase was then removed and nucleic acids precipitated by the addition of LiCl (final concentration 2 m). Samples were well mixed and nucleic acids precipitated overnight at 4°C. After the precipitation step, the samples were centrifuged (12,000g for 20 min at 4°C). The pellet was redissolved in 2 mL of water and 200 μL of AcONa followed by the addition of 5.5 mL of 100% (v/v) ethanol and precipitated at –20°C for 2 h. The samples were then centrifuged (12,000g for 30 min at 4°C), and the pellets were washed in 2 mL of 70% (v/v) ethanol and centrifuged (12000g for 20 min at 4°C). The pellets were dried and resuspended in water.

cDNA Microarray

The method used to spot M. sexta- and regurgitate-responsive genes and seven well-characterized N. attenuata control genes (PI, HPL, PMT1, AOS, XET, WRKY, 3′ region of LOX, and 5′ region of LOX) onto epoxy coated slides has been described by Halitschke et al. (2003). For each cDNA, two PCR fragments, with 5′-Aminolink C6 modification (Sigma-ARK, Darmstadt, Germany) on either strand, were synthesized. Even numbered fragments (see Supplemental Table I at http://www.plantphysiol.org) carry the Aminolink modification at primers TOP9–22, SMA4–23, or ASV6–22, whereas odd numbered fragments carry the modification at primers TOP10–24, SMA3–22, or ASV5–21. All cDNA samples, including the seven well-characterized M. sexta-induced genes as controls, were commercially spotted four times by Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH according to their procedure on the slides using a robot equipped with six printing tips (Biorobotics MicroGrid II Microarrayer: Genemachine, Apogent Discoveries, Hudson, NH). Hence, each gene was represented on the microarray by two independent PCR fragments that, in turn, were spotted in quadruplicate. A complete list of identities and positions of spotted PCR products on the microarray can be found in Halitschke et al. (2003).

Sampling, Microarray Hybridization, Quantification, and Analysis

The three treated leaves from each plant of the simulated caterpillar treatment, three leaves per plant of equivalent nodal positions from unwounded plants of the UV-B treatments, and three leaves per plant of unwounded plants of the attenuated or no UV-B treatment were harvested 24 h after the simulated caterpillar folivory and flash frozen in liquid N. In each experiment, there were 12 individual plants for each treatment (four from each replicate block), and leaves from the same treatment were pooled together for RNA extraction. The UV-B- and simulated caterpillar-treated samples served as treatment (Cy3), and the unperturbed, non-UV-B-exposed samples were labeled and hybridized as controls (Cy5). mRNA isolation, labeling, determination of labeling efficiency, and microarray hybridization were carried out as described (Halitschke et al., 2003). The hybridized microarrays were scanned with an Affymetrix 428 Array Scanner (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Scanning, image analysis, background correction, and slide-specific normalization were all carried out as explained by Halitschke et al. (2003). The ratios of normalized fluorescence values for Cy3 and Cy5 of each individual spot (ER) and the mean of the four replicate spots for each cDNA (two for each gene, ER1 and ER2) were calculated. Log-transformed ERs were subjected to a one-tailed Student's t test against the hypothesis of no treatment effect (i.e. ER = 1).

Our criteria to assess the significance of the expression changes for a given gene were: (a) a significant Student's t test value in the comparison against ER = 1 (n = 4 replicate spots; P < 0.05), (b) a deviation of at least ±0.25 from ER = 1, and (c) verification that criteria (a) and (b) were fulfilled by the ERs obtained for both PCR fragments (i.e. ER1 and ER2). An arbitrary threshold was utilized for two reasons: first, to account for normalization errors; and second, to account for the fact that replicate data did not result from repeated hybridizations with the same RNAs but from repeated probe spotting. An ER calculated as a mean of replicate ERs and the use of statistically rigorous criteria to evaluate within-array variance allowed us to use lower thresholds with this polyepoxide microarray in comparison with the poly-Lys microarray used in a previous study (Hui et al., 2003). To evaluate our criteria, two arrays were hybridized with the same two cDNA pools (R. Halitschke and I.T. Baldwin, unpublished data). It was found that 210 of 241 genes (87%) had the same regulation identified by the criteria described above. Of the 31 genes that did not show consistent regulation between the two repeated hybridizations, 24 had the same direction in mean ER, but did not meet the statistical requirements for a significant change.

Determination of PI Activity

The UV-B and simulated caterpillar treatments and the leaf harvest procedures were carried out as described above for the microarray experiments. The simulated caterpillar treatment was applied in the early afternoon, and leaves were harvested before and several times after elicitation and flash frozen in liquid N. There were three replicates (three individual plants) per treatment and time point. PI activity in leaf extracts were determined using the method of Jongsma et al. (1993, 1994; van Dam et al., 2001). Protein levels were determined following Bradford (1976).

Insect Growth Bioassays

M. sexta eggs were obtained from the Entomology Department of North Carolina State University (Raleigh). Two neonate larvae were placed on each of 16 plants of N. longiflora, and 20 plants of N. attenuata were grown under greenhouse conditions (see above). The two caterpillars were placed on the same leaf (fourth–fifth fully expanded leaves of rosette stage plants). One-half of the plants of each species had received UV-B supplementation for at least 2 weeks before the caterpillars were placed on them, and one-half belonged to the no-UV-B control. The UV-B treatments continued during the feeding period (1 week). To prevent direct exposure of the caterpillars to UV-B, the host leaf in each plant was enclosed in a cotton gauze bag that had its upper side covered with aluminum foil. These bags were applied to UV-B-exposed and control plants. Caterpillars were weighted at the end of the experiment.

Distribution of Materials

Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes, subject to the requisite permission from any third party owners of all or parts of the material. Obtaining any permissions will be the responsibility of the requestor.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:


We thank the Jardín Botánico and Dr. Miguel Culaciati for granting us access to the facilities in Huerta Grande. We are especially grateful to Johannes Stratmann for stimulating discussions on UV signaling; Carlos Mazza for assistance with the experiments and data analysis; Klaus Gase, Matthias Held, Thomas Hahn, and Susan Kutschbach for invaluable assistance in microarray hybridization, reading, and data analysis; and Jorge Zavala for practical advice on PI determinations.


Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.024323.

1This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (grant to C.L.B. and A.L.S.), by the Guggenheim Foundation (grant to C.L.B.), by the Max Plank Gesellschaft (grant to I.T.B.), and by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (fellowship to M.M.I.). C.L.B. and A.L.S. are Investigators of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas.

[w]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. The supplemental material is available at http://www.plantphysiol.org.


  • A.-H.-Mackerness S, Butt PJ, Jordan BR, Thomas B (1996) Amelioration of ultraviolet-B-induced down-regulation of mRNA levels for chloroplast proteins, by high irradiance, is mediated by photosynthesis. J Plant Physiol 148: 100–106.
  • A.-H.-Mackerness S, John CF, Jordan B, Thomas B (2001) Early signaling components in ultraviolet-B responses: distinct roles for different reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide. FEBS Lett 489: 237–242. [PubMed]
  • A.-H.-Mackerness S, Liu LS, Thomas B, Thompson WF, Jordan BR, White MJ (1998) Individual members of the light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein gene family in pea (Pisum sativum) show differential responses to ultraviolet-B radiation. Physiol Plant 103: 377–384.
  • A.-H.-Mackerness S, Surplus SL, Blake P, John CF, Buchannan-Wollaston V, Jordan BR, Thomas B (1999) Ultraviolet-B-induced stress and changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana: role of signalling pathways controlled by jasmonic acid, ethylene and reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Environ 22: 1413–1423.
  • Allen DJ, Nogués S, Baker NR (1998) Ozone depletion and increased UV-B radiation: is there a real threat to photosynthesis? J Exp Bot 49: 1775–1788.
  • Baldwin IT, Staszak-Kozinski L, Davidson R (1994) Up in smoke: I. Smoke-derived germination cues for positive annual, Nicotiana attenuata Torr. Ex. Watson. J Chem Ecol 20: 2345–2371. [PubMed]
  • Ballaré CL, Barnes PW, Flint SD (1995) Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by ultraviolet-B radiation in de-etiolating tomato seedlings: I. The photoreceptor. Physiol Plant 93: 584–592.
  • Ballaré CL, Scopel A, Mazza C (1999) Effects of solar UV-B radiation on terrestrial ecosystems: case studies from southern South America. In J Rozema, ed, Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: The Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation on Terrestrial Ecosystems. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 293–311.
  • Ballaré CL, Rousseaux MC, Searles PS, Zaller JG, Giordano CV, Robson TM, Caldwell MM, Sala OE, Scopel AL (2001) Impacts of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on terrestrial ecosystems of Tierra del Fuego (southern Argentina): an overview of recent progress. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 62: 67–77. [PubMed]
  • Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Stapleton AE, Yanovsky MJ (1996) Solar ultraviolet-B radiation affects seedling emergence, DNA integrity, plant morphology, growth rate, and attractiveness to herbivore insects in Datura ferox. Plant Physiol 112: 161–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Beggs C, Wellmann E (1994) Photocontrol of flavonoid biosynthesis. In R Kendrick, G Kronenberg, eds, Photomorphogenesis in Plant. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 733–751.
  • Boccalandro HE, Mazza CA, Mazzella MA, Casal JJ, Ballaré CL (2001) Ultraviolet B radiation enhances a phytochrome-B-mediated photomorphogenic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126: 780–788. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bothwell ML, Sherbot DMJ, Pollock CM (1994) Ecosystem responses to solar ultraviolet-B radiation: influence of trophic-level interactions. Science 265: 97–100. [PubMed]
  • Bowler C, Fluhr R (2000) The role of calcium and activated oxygens as signals for controlling cross-tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 5: 241–246. [PubMed]
  • Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254. [PubMed]
  • Brederode FT, Linthorst HJ, Bol JF (1991) Differential induction of acquired resistance and PR gene expression in tobacco by virus infection, ethephon treatment, UV light and wounding. Plant Mol Biol 17: 1117–1125. [PubMed]
  • Brosché M, Fant C, Bergkvist SW, Strid H, Svensk A, Olsson O, Strid A (1999) Molecular markers for UV-B stress in plants: alteration of the expression of four classes of genes in Pisum sativum and the formation of high molecular mass RNA adducts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1447: 185–198. [PubMed]
  • Brosché M, Schuler MA, Kalbina I, Connor L, Strid A (2002) Gene regulation by low level UV-B radiation: identification by DNA array analysis. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1: 656–664. [PubMed]
  • Caldwell MM (1971) Solar UV irradiation and the growth and development of higher plants. In AC Giese, ed, Photophysiology, Vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–177.
  • Caldwell MM, Flint SD (1997) Uses of biological weighting functions and the need of scaling for the ozone reduction problem. Plant Ecol 128: 66–76.
  • Conconi A, Smerdon MJ, Howe GA, Ryan CA (1996) The octadecanoid signalling pathway in plants mediates a response to ultraviolet radiation. Nature 383: 826–829. [PubMed]
  • Ernst D, Bodemann A, Schmelzer E, Langebartels C, Sandermann H (1996) β-1,3-Glucanase mRNA is locally, but not systematically induced in Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Bel W3 after ozone fumigation. J Plant Physiol 148: 215–221.
  • Ernst D, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, Sandermann HJ (1992) Ozone-induced changes of mRNA levels of beta-1,3-glucanase, chitinase and “pathogenesis-related” protein 1b in tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 20: 673–682. [PubMed]
  • Fiscus EL, Booker FL (1995) Is increased UV-B a threat to crop photosynthesis and productivity? Photosynth Res 43: 81–92. [PubMed]
  • Frohnmeyer H, Loyall L, Blatt MR, Grabov A (1999) Millisecond UV-B irradiation evokes prolonged elevation of cytosolic-free Ca2+ and stimulates gene expression in transgenic parsley cell cultures. Plant J 20: 109–117. [PubMed]
  • Gatehouse JA (2002) Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction. New Phytol 156: 145–169.
  • Green R, Fluhr R (1995) UV-B-induced PR-1 accumulation is mediated by active oxygen species. Plant Cell 7: 203–212. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Halitschke R, Gase C, Hui D, Schmidt DD, Baldwin IT (2003) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuate: VI. Microarray analysis reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by fatty acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Physiol 131: 1894–1902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hermsmeier D, Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2001) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata: I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol 125: 683–700. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hideg É, Barta C, Kálai T, Vass I, Hideg K, Asada K (2002) Detection of singlet oxygen and superoxide with fluorescent sensors in leaves under stress by photoinhibition or UV radiation. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 1154–1164. [PubMed]
  • Hideg É, Kálai T, Hideg K, Vass I (2000) Do oxidative stress conditions impairing photosynthesis in the light manifest as photoinhibition? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 1511–1516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hui D, Iqbal J, Lehmann K, Gase K, Saluz HP, Baldwin IT (2003) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata: V. Microarray analysis and further characterization of large-scale changes in herbivore-induced mRNAs. Plant Physiol 131: 1877–1893. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jongsma MA, Bakker PL, Stiekema WJ (1993) Quantitative determination of serine proteinase inhibitor activity using a radial diffusion assay. Anal Biochem 212: 79–84. [PubMed]
  • Jongsma MA, Bakker PL, Visser B, Stiekema WJ (1994) Trypsin inhibitor activity in mature tobacco and tomato plants is mainly induced locally in response to insect attack, wounding and virus infection. Planta 195: 29–35.
  • Jordan BR, Chow HJ, Anderson JM (1992) Changes in mRNA levels and polypeptide subunits of ribulose 1:5-bisphosphate carboxylase in response to supplementary ultraviolet-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ 15: 91–98.
  • Kalbin G, Hidema J, Brosché M, Kumagai T, Bornman JF, Strid Å (2001) UV-B-induced DNA damage and expression of defence genes under UV-B stress: tissue-specific molecular marker analysis in leaves. Plant Cell Environ 24: 983–990.
  • Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
  • Krizek DT, Britz SJ, Mirecki RM (1998) Inhibitory effects of ambient levels of solar UV-A and UV-B radiation on growth of cv. New Red Fire lettuce. Physiol Plant 103: 1–7.
  • Malanga G, Puntarulo S (1995) Oxidative responses and antioxidant content in Chlorella vulgaris after exposure to ultraviolet-B radiation. Physiol Plant 94: 672–679.
  • Mazza CA, Battista D, Zima A, Szwarcberg-Bracchitta M, Giordano CV, Acevedo A, Scopel AL, Ballare CL (1999a) The effects of solar UV-B radiation on the growth and yield of barley are accompanied by increased DNA damage and antioxidant responses. Plant Cell Environ 22: 61–67.
  • Mazza CA, Boccalandro HE, Giordano CV, Battista D, Scopel AL, Ballaré CL (2000) Functional significance and induction by solar radiation of ultraviolet-absorbing sunscreens in field-grown soybean crops. Plant Physiol 122: 117–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mazza CA, Izaguirre M, Zavala J, Scopel A, Ballaré C (2002) Insect perception of ambient ultraviolet-B radiation. Ecol Lett 5: 722–726.
  • Mazza CA, Zavala J, Scopel AL, Ballaré CL (1999b) Perception of solar UVB radiation by phytophagous insects: behavioral responses and ecosystem implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 980–985. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Montoya T, Nomura T, Farrar K, Kaneta T, Yokota T, Bishop GJ (2002) Cloning the tomato Curl3 gene highlights the putative dual role of the leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase tBRI1/SR160 in plant steroid hormone and peptide hormone signaling. Plant Cell 14: 3163–3176. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Orozco-Cárdenas M, Ryan CA (1999) Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 6553–6557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Orozco-Cárdenas ML, Narváez-Vásquez J, Ryan CA (2001) Hydrogen peroxide acts as a second messenger for the induction of defense genes in tomato plants in response to wounding, systemin, and methyl jasmonate. Plant Cell 13: 179–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pohlon E, Baldwin IT (2001) Artificial diets “capture” the dynamics of jasmonate-induced defenses in plants. Entomol Exp Appl 100: 127–130.
  • Rao MV, Paliyath G, Ormrod DP (1996) Ultraviolet-B and ozone-induced biochemical changes in an antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 110: 125–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rousseaux MC, Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Searles PS, Caldwell MM (1998) Solar ultraviolet-B radiation affects plant-insect interactions in a natural ecosystem of Tierra del Fuego (southern Argentina). Oecologia 116: 528–535.
  • Rousseaux MC, Scopel AL, Searles PS, Caldwell MM, Sala OE, Ballaré CL (2001) Responses to solar ultraviolet-B radiation in a shrub-dominated natural ecosystem of Tierra del Fuego (southern Argentina). Global Change Biol 7: 467–478.
  • Ryan CA (2000) The systemin signaling pathway: differential activation of plant defensive genes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1477: 112–121. [PubMed]
  • Sävenstrand H, Brosché M, Strid A (2002) Regulation of gene expression by low levels of ultraviolet-B radiation in Pisum sativum: isolation of novel genes by suppression subtractive hybridisation. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 402–410. [PubMed]
  • Schittko U, Hermsmeier D, Baldwin IT (2001) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata: II. Accumulation of plant mRNAs in response to insect-derived cues. Plant Physiol 125: 701–710. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stratmann J, Scheer J, Ryan CA (2000a) Suramin inhibits initiation of defense signaling by systemin, chitosan, and a β-glucan elicitor in suspension-cultured Lycopersicon peruvianum cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 8862–8867. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stratmann J, Stelmach B, Weiler E, Ryan C (2000b) UVB/UVA radiation activates a 48 kDa myelin basic protein kinase and potentiates wound signaling in tomato leaves. Photochem Photobiol 71: 116–123. [PubMed]
  • Strid A, Chow W, Anderson JM (1996) Changes in the relaxation of electronic shifts of photosynthetic pigments and in the levels of mRNA transcripts in leaves of Pisum Sativum as a result of exposure to supplementary UV-B radiation: the dependency on the intensity of the photosynthetically active radiation. Plant Cell Physiol 37: 61–67.
  • Surplus SL, Jordan BR, Murphy AM, Carr JP, Thomas B, A.-H.-Mackerness S (1998) Ultraviolet-B-induced responses in Arabidopsis thaliana: role of salicylic acid and reactive oxygen species in the regulation of transcripts encoding photosynthetic and acidic pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Cell Environ 21: 685–694.
  • Thalmair M, Bauw G, Thiel S, Döhring T, Langebartels C, Sandermann H (1996) Ozone and ultraviolet-B effects on the defense-related proteins β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase in tobacco. J Plant Physiol 148: 222–228.
  • van Dam NM, Horn M, Mares M, Baldwin IT (2001) Ontogeny constrains the systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuata. J Chem Ecol 27: 547–568. [PubMed]
  • Voelckel C, Baldwin IT (2003) Detecting herbivore-specific transcriptional responses in plants with multiple DDRT-PCR and subtractive library procedures. Physiol Plant 118: 240–252.
  • Walling LL (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19: 195–216. [PubMed]
  • Weber H (2002) Fatty acid-derived signals in plants. Trends Plant Sci 7: 217–224. [PubMed]
  • Willekens H, Camp WV, Montagu MV, Inzé D, Langebartels C, Sandermann JH (1994) Ozone, sulfur dioxide, and ultraviolet B have similar effects on mRNA accumulation of antioxidant genes in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia L. Plant Physiol 106: 1007–1014. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yalamanchili RD, Stratmann JW (2002) Ultraviolet-B activates components of the systemin signaling pathway in Lycopersicon peruvianum suspension-cultured cells. J Biol Chem 277: 28424–28430. [PubMed]
  • Yalpani N, Enyedi AJ, Leon J, Raskin I (1994) UV light and ozone stimulate accumulation of salicylic acid, pathogenesis-related proteins and virus resistance in tobacco. Planta 193: 372–376.
  • Yang T, Poovaiah BW (2002) A calmodulin-binding/CGCG Box DNA-binding protein family involved in multiple signaling pathways in plants. J Biol Chem 277: 45049–45058. [PubMed]
  • Zavala J, Scopel A, Ballaré C (2001) Effects of solar UV-B radiation on soybean crops: Impact on leaf herbivory by Anticarsia gemmatalis. Plant Ecol 156: 121–130.
  • Ziegler J, Keinanen M, Baldwin IT (2001) Herbivore-induced allene oxide synthase transcripts and jasmonic acid in Nicotiana attenuata. Phytochemistry 58: 729–738. [PubMed]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Plant Biologists


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • EST
    Published EST sequences
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Nucleotide
    Published Nucleotide sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...