![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Cell Biology Identification of an N-Acetylglucosamine Transporter That Mediates Hyphal Induction in Candida albicans ![]() *Graduate Program in Genetics and †Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5222 Daniel Lew, Monitoring Editor Corresponding author.Address correspondence to: James B. Konopka (Email: james.konopka/at/sunysb.edu) Received October 19, 2006; Revised December 5, 2006; Accepted December 20, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The sugar N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) plays an important role in nutrient sensing and cellular regulation in a wide range of organisms from bacteria to humans. In the fungal pathogen Candida albicans, GlcNAc induces a morphological transition from budding to hyphal growth. Proteomic comparison of plasma membrane proteins from buds and from hyphae induced by GlcNAc identified a novel hyphal protein (Ngt1) with similarity to the major facilitator superfamily of transporters. An Ngt1-GFP fusion was detected in the plasma membrane after induction with GlcNAc, but not other related sugars. Ngt1-GFP was also induced by macrophage phagocytosis, suggesting a role for the GlcNAc response in signaling entry into phagolysosomes. NGT1 is needed for efficient GlcNAc uptake and for the ability to induce hyphae at low GlcNAc concentrations. High concentrations of GlcNAc could bypass the need for NGT1 to induce hyphae, indicating that elevated intracellular levels of GlcNAc induce hyphal formation. Expression of NGT1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoted GlcNAc uptake, indicating that Ngt1 acts directly as a GlcNAc transporter. Transport mediated by Ngt1 was specific, as other sugars could not compete for the uptake of GlcNAc. Thus, Ngt1 represents the first eukaryotic GlcNAc transporter to be discovered. The presence of NGT1 homologues in the genome sequences of a wide range of eukaryotes from yeast to mammals suggests that they may also function in the cellular processes regulated by GlcNAc, including those that underlie important diseases such as cancer and diabetes. INTRODUCTION N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) is an amino sugar that carries out important roles in a broad range of cells from bacteria to humans. One aspect of GlcNAc function is to mediate cellular signaling. In bacteria, GlcNAc induces components that are important for colonization of human hosts, including fimbrins that mediate adhesion to host cells (Sohanpal et al., 2004 ), multidrug exporter genes (Hirakawa et al., 2006 ) and Curli fibers that promote biofilm formation (Barnhart et al., 2006 ). In mammals, GlcNAc is a key sensor of nutrient status that is involved in insulin signaling, cell cycle control, and other essential processes. Nutritional effects that lead to increased GlcNAc levels result in its conversion to UDP-GlcNAc and subsequent attachment to proteins on serine or threonine residues in a dynamic manner that is analogous to modification of proteins by phosphorylation (Slawson and Hart, 2003 ; Zachara and Hart, 2006 ). In fact, the interplay between O-GlcNAc modification and phosphorylation of proteins regulates many critical transcription factors, such as c-myc and p53 (Chou and Hart, 2001 ; Yang et al., 2006 ). O-GlcNAc modification also regulates other processes including proteosome function (Zachara and Hart, 2004 ). In addition to these regulatory roles, GlcNAc contributes to the N-linked glycosylation, glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor addition to proteins and is polymerized into chitin, which forms part of the fungal cell wall and the exoskeletons of parasites, insects, and other organisms.GlcNAc induces the fungal pathogen Candida albicans to switch from forming round budding cells to instead growing as long thin hyphal cells. This morphological transition is thought to be an important virulence factor (Sudbery et al., 2004 ; Whiteway and Oberholzer, 2004 ). C. albicans is one of the leading causes of nosocomial bloodstream infections and is capable of causing severe systemic infections (Edmond et al., 1999 ; Mavor et al., 2005 ; Spellberg et al., 2006 ). C. albicans can be detected at sites of infection in various morphologies including rounded buds, pseudohyphae (chains of elongated buds), and hyphae (chains of long thin cells with parallel walls) (Odds, 1988 ). Each form is thought to confer a distinct advantage during infection. For example, small buds are more likely to disseminate in the bloodstream and hyphal cells may be better suited for invasive growth into tissues. The distinct cell types also differ in their production of virulence factors, such as the adhesin proteins that mediate attachment to host cells and secreted hydrolytic enzymes that facilitate invasive growth (Whiteway and Oberholzer, 2004 ; Kumamoto and Vinces, 2005 ).In vitro studies have identified a variety of different stimuli that can induce C. albicans to switch morphologies. One of the strongest known inducers of hyphal growth is serum. Screens for chemically defined inducers have found that nutrients, such as the amino sugar GlcNAc (Simonetti et al., 1974 ) and certain amino acids (Odds, 1988 ; Maidan et al., 2005 ), will also stimulate hyphal growth. Environmental conditions also contribute to hyphal induction, as it occurs optimally at 37°C and can be stimulated by alkaline pH and 5% CO2 (Davis, 2003 ; Sudbery et al., 2004 ; Klengel et al., 2005 ). The upstream components of the hyphal signal pathway have not been clearly identified, but many of the downstream signaling components are known (Berman and Sudbery, 2002 ). For example, production of cAMP by adenylyl cyclase plays a key role in inducing hyphal formation. In contrast to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, adenylyl cyclase is not needed for growth of C. albicans and instead plays an essential role in promoting hyphal formation (Rocha et al., 2001 ). cAMP stimulation of protein kinase A results in phosphorylation of downstream targets, including the transcription factor Efg1, which is needed for hyphal growth (Stoldt et al., 1997 ; Tebarth et al., 2003 ). In addition, MAP kinase signaling activates the Cph1 transcription factor that is also involved in hyphal signaling (Lo et al., 1997 ). Hyphal growth can also be promoted by proteolytic activation of the Rim101 transcription factor at alkaline pH (Davis et al., 2000 ). The hyphal pathway is also negatively regulated by the repressor Tup1 (Braun and Johnson, 1997 ).To better define the upstream components involved in hyphal signaling, as well as the differences between buds and hyphae, we carried out a proteomic comparison of plasma membrane proteins from budding and hyphal cells. GlcNAc was selected as the inducer of hyphal growth to better understand its role in this process, because the teleological basis for the effects of GlcNAc has not been understood from previous studies. GlcNAc was first reported to induce hyphae over 30 years ago in a screen for chemically defined inducers of hyphal growth in vitro (Simonetti et al., 1974 ). Subsequent studies revealed C. albicans is capable of taking up GlcNAc and using it as an energy source, whereas the nonpathogenic S. cerevisiae lacks the proteins needed to transport and catabolize GlcNAc (Kumar et al., 2000 ; Singh et al., 2001 ). Mutational analysis indicates that the enzymes needed to catabolize GlcNAc in C. albicans also contribute to virulence (Singh et al., 2001 ; Yamada-Okabe et al., 2001 ). These include the enzymes that phosphorylate (Hxk1), deacetylate (Dac1), and deamidate (Nag1) GlcNAc, leading to its conversion to fructose-6-PO4 (Kumar et al., 2000 ; Singh et al., 2001 ; Yamada-Okabe et al., 2001 ). The GlcNAc transporter had not been identified previously, but in this study we report that one of the proteins identified by mass spectrometry (Ngt1) acts as a GlcNAc transporter, thus permitting direct analysis of its role in GlcNAc transport and signaling. Ngt1 is also significant in that it represents the first eukaryotic GlcNAc transporter to be identified and will therefore facilitate the analysis of the role of the homologous proteins in other organisms for their role in cellular regulation by GlcNAc.MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains and Media The C. albicans and S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are described in Table 1. Strains were propagated on rich YPD medium or on synthetic medium essentially as described (Sherman, 1991 ). Uridine, 80 mg/l, was added to C. albicans cultures. To induce hyphal growth with different concentrations of GlcNAc, cells grown overnight in basal yeast medium (BYNB) containing galactose and buffered to pH 6.8 with 10 mM PIPES were washed and inoculated into 5 ml fresh medium at a density of 2 × 106 cells/ml. After 5 h of growth, the cells were washed with buffered BYNB medium and inoculated into buffered BYNB containing different concentrations of GlcNAc. Cells were grown at 37°C for 2 h, and then the cell morphologies were examined microscopically. The buffered medium and the growth regimen described above were used to maintain a low spontaneous level of hyphal formation that can been seen under other conditions due to farnesol depletion and pH changes when adjusting the cultures (Enjalbert and Whiteway, 2005 ).
The C. albicans NGT1-GFP strain was constructed by homologous recombination. PCR was used to add ~70 base pairs of sequence homologous to the 3′ end of the NGT1 open reading frame (ORF) to a cassette that contains GFP and a URA3 selectable marker (Gerami-Nejad et al., 2001 ). Ura+ colonies resulting from the transformation of the PCR product into C. albicans were then grown on GlcNAc medium and screened for GFP-positive cells by fluorescence microscopy. The ngt1Δ homozygous deletion strain was constructed by successive transformation of strain BWP17 with PCR-generated constructs containing either the ARG4 or HIS1 selectable marker genes flanked by ~70-base pair regions that were homologous to the sequences flanking the ORF of NGT1 (Wilson et al., 1999 ). Proper integration of the GFP and deletion cassettes was verified by PCR.Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Plasma Membrane Proteins Cells were grown in budding phase by diluting a fresh overnight culture to 8 × 105 cells/ml in YPD medium and then incubating at 30°C until the cultures reached 107 cells/ml. To harvest cells initiating hyphal phase growth (germ tubes), a fresh overnight culture grown in YPD was diluted to 8 × 105 cells/ml in YPD medium and then grown to 107 cells/ml at 30°C. Cells were washed, resuspended in minimal medium containing 2.5 mM GlcNAc, and incubated at 37°C for 75–90 min. Germ tube emergence was confirmed by microscopy. Budding cells and germ tubes were harvested by centrifugation and washed with water, and then pellets of 109 cells were frozen for later use. The cell pellets were lysed by agitation with glass beads in cold TNE buffer with protease inhibitors (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 2.5 mM benzamidine, and 30 μM pepstatin). The plasma membrane fraction was then isolated by density gradient centrifugation, essentially as described previously (Schandel and Jenness, 1994 ; Dosil et al., 1998 ). In brief, cell extract was loaded at the bottom of a density gradient that ranged from 38 to 22% Renocal-76 (Bracco Diagnostic, Princeton, NJ). Tubes were spun in a Beckman SW40Ti rotor (Fullerton, CA) for 37 h at 35,000 rpm. The gradient was partitioned into 14 fractions by taking samples from the top, and then a 10-μl aliquot of each sample was run on a Western blot and probed with anti-Pma1 antibodies in order to detect the plasma membrane fraction. The plasma membrane fractions were subsequently extracted with ice-cold 1% Triton X-100 in order to isolate the detergent-resistant membrane fraction and thereby purify plasma membrane proteins away from contaminating cytoplasmic proteins, such as the abundant ribosomal proteins. Plasma membrane fractions extracted with cold 1% Triton X-100 were loaded at the bottom of a 40–5% sucrose gradient and spun in a SW41Ti rotor for 25 h at 35,000 rpm. The gradient was split into different fractions and run on Western blots probed with anti-Pma1 antibodies to identify the detergent resistant membrane fraction that floated to the top of the gradient, which was then removed for analysis.Approximately 500 μg of detergent-resistant membrane fraction from budding or germ tube cells was then separated by SDS-PAGE and prepared for mass spectrometry. 10-kDa ranges of the gel lanes were cut out, diced up, washed with 50% (vol/vol) methanol and 5% (vol/vol) acetic acid, dehydrated with acetonitrile, rehydrated with 10 mM DTT to reduce the samples, and then treated with 100 mM iodoacetamide to alkylate the proteins. The gel slices were washed with 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, dehydrated with acetonitrile, and then dried. The samples were then rehydrated in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer and then 30 μl of 20 ng/ml sequencing grade TPCK-treated trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) was added, and samples were incubated overnight at 37°C. Tryptic peptides were recovered with extraction buffer (50% acetonitrile and 50% formic acid) and analyzed at the Stony Brook University Proteomics Center by liquid chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization (nano-LC/ESI/MSMS) on an API Qstar Pulsar i quadrupole-time of fly (Q-TOF) tandem mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex, Foster City, CA). Mass spectrometry results were then compared with the ORF19 release of the Candida genome database to identify the corresponding proteins (http://www.candidagenome.org/). Plasmid Construction A plasmid carrying NGT1 was constructed by PCR amplification of the genomic sequence from 974 base pairs upstream of the initiator ATG to 354 bases downstream of the terminator codon. This DNA fragment was then inserted between the SacI and SacII restriction sites of the URA3 plasmid pDDB57 (Wilson et al., 2000 ). The resulting plasmid was linearized in the promoter region by digestion with EcoRV, and integrated into the ngt1Δ strain YJA2 to create a complemented strain called YJA4. A plasmid designed to express NGT1 in S. cerevisiae under control of the GAL1 promoter was constructed by PCR amplifying the NGT1 ORF and inserting it at the SpeI site in the polylinker region of plasmid pRS426GAL1 (Mumberg et al., 1994 ).GlcNAc Uptake Assays To assay GlcNAc uptake in C. albicans strains, overnight cultures were harvested by centrifugation, washed in BYNB, and then inoculated into fresh BYNB containing either dextrose or GlcNAc. Cells were grown for 4 h at 30°C to induce the GlcNAc pathway, harvested by centrifugation, washed with BYNB, and then resuspended at 1.1 × 108 cells/ml. Uptake assays were carried out in 96-well plates and were initiated by adding 107 cells to 10 μl of radioactive [3H]GlcNAc/well (200 μM final concentration; 5 mCi/mmol). Reactions were terminated by collecting cells onto Whatman GF/C glass microfiber filters (Clifton, NJ) using a Brandel Cell Harvester (Gaithersburg, MD). Filters were dried, and then the [3H]GlcNAc taken up by the cells was quantified using a scintillation counter. To assay GlcNAc uptake in S. cerevisiae strains, W303 cells containing either pRS426GAL1-NGT1 or the control empty vector were grown overnight in synthetic medium lacking uracil and containing either 2% dextrose or galactose. Cells were then washed, inoculated into fresh medium, and grown for 4 h at 30°C. [3H]GlcNAc uptake assays were then carried out as described above. The ability of different sugars to compete for the uptake of GlcNAc was assayed in S. cerevisiae strain W303 containing pRS426GAL1-NGT1 that was prepared as described above. Cells, 107, were added per well of 96-well plates that also contained [3H]GlcNAc (200 μM final) plus either 2 mM (10×) or 20 mM (100×) final concentration of one of the following cold competitor sugars: GlcNAc, dextrose, galactose, fructose, glucosamine or N-acetylmannosamine. Macrophage Infection Assay J774 macrophage cells were prepared for infection by plating 105 cells/well on coverslips in 24-well plates containing DMEM medium with 10% FBS. Cells were incubated overnight and then the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM lacking FBS. The C. albicans strains were prepared for infection assays by growing overnight in YPD, and then washing and resuspending the cells in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 107 cells/ml. Infections were initiated by adding the appropriate C. albicans strain to a well of J774 cells at an MOI of 1. Cells were incubated for 40 min at 37°C, and then the J774 cells were washed and fresh medium was added. Assays were stopped at different time points by adding paraformaldehyde to 2.5% final concentration for 20 min. Samples were then washed, mounted on slides, and examined microscopically as described below. Microscopy Ngt1-GFP fluorescence was analyzed in cells that were grown overnight in synthetic complete medium containing glucose but lacking uracil. Cells were washed with BYNB and then incubated with minimal medium containing different sugars or serum for 2–4 h at 37°C. Cells were washed with BYNB and analyzed immediately by microscopy. To compare the morphogenesis of wild-type versus ngt1Δ cells, cells were grown overnight in synthetic medium containing dextrose, washed, adjusted to 2–3 × 105 cells/ml in BYNB, and incubated in the presence or absence of 2 mM GlcNAc at 37°C. Cells were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy to detect GFP and by differential interference (DIC) microscopy to detect cell morphology. Images were captured using an Olympus BH2 microscope (Melville, NY) equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam digital camera (Thornwood, NY). Fluorescence intensity of the images was quantified using Openlab 3.0.8 software from Improvision (Lexington, MA). Analysis of NGT1 Homologues BLAST searches (Altschul et al., 1990 ) were carried out to identify NGT1 homologues in the genome sequences of other organisms present at the Web site of the National Center for Biotechnology (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Multiple sequence alignments of the predicted Ngt1 proteins and an evolutionary tree of their relatedness were carried out using Clustal W (Thompson et al., 1994 ).RESULTS Identification of GlcNAc-induced Plasma Membrane Proteins by Mass Spectrometry A proteomics approach aimed at identifying plasma membrane proteins that are unique to the bud or hyphal phases of C. albicans was carried out to identify new proteins related to the regulation of morphogenesis and virulence. Plasma membranes were purified by density gradient centrifugation from budding cells grown in standard medium (YPD) or from cells induced with GlcNAc to form hyphae. The detergent-resistant fraction of the plasma membrane was then isolated to help remove contaminating cytoplasmic proteins (see Materials and Methods). The purified membrane proteins were then separated by SDS gel electrophoresis, trypsin-digested, and analyzed by liquid chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry. Comparison of the mass spectrometry data with the ORFs predicted in the C. albicans genome sequence identified 137 different proteins. Approximately one third were detected only in buds, one third in hyphal cells, and one third were common to both buds and hyphae. A representative set of the proteins that were identified is shown in Table 2, and the full set of proteins is described in the Supplementary Data.
Transporters comprised the major class of proteins, which accounted for 40% of the total. The majority of the proteins were thus membrane-spanning proteins, although ~5% of the proteins were GPI anchored and another 5% were acylated. Another major group of proteins were those involved in iron uptake (~5%), which is critical for C. albicans virulence. About 15% of the proteins did not have an obvious homolog in S. cerevisiae, and a similar fraction did not have an obvious prediction for their function. Most types of proteins were represented at roughly similar levels in the different groups. However, it was interesting that the proteins lacking a homolog in S. cerevisiae represented 19% of those found only in buds, 18% of those found in germ tubes, but only 6% of those found in both buds and germ tubes. Altogether there were 20 proteins that lack a homolog in the nonpathogenic S. cerevisiae and are thus candidates for carrying out virulence functions in C. albicans. Ngt1-GFP Is Specifically Induced by GlcNAc A protein we named Ngt1 that corresponds to ORF orf19.5392 in the C. albicans genome was selected for further study, because it was identified with very high confidence by mass spectrometry and initially appeared to be specific to hyphae. Subsequent analyses detected Ngt1 in budding cells, albeit with lower confidence scores, suggesting that Ngt1 was likely to be induced by GlcNAc. Ngt1 is also predicted to contain multiple transmembrane domains and was therefore unlikely to be a cytoplasmic contaminant. It was also interesting that homologues of Ngt1 were absent from S. cerevisiae and its close relatives, but present in a wide range of other fungi, including the pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans and Aspergillus fumigatis, suggesting that Ngt1 could be related to virulence. To verify that Ngt1 encodes a plasma membrane protein present in GlcNAc-induced hyphal cells, an NGT1-GFP fusion gene was constructed in the genome of C. albicans by introducing a GFP tag at the C terminus. Fluorescence microscopy readily detected Ngt1-GFP at the periphery of GlcNAc-induced hyphae, consistent with plasma membrane localization. In contrast, Ngt1-GFP was not detected in budding cells grown in glucose medium (Figure 1
The specificity of NGT1 regulation was analyzed further by growing cells in medium containing different sugars (Figure 2
Ngt1-GFP Is Induced by Macrophage Phagocytosis The role of GlcNAc signaling in C. albicans has been unclear, because GlcNAc was initially identified as an inducer of hyphal growth in a screen for a chemically defined alternative to serum (Simonetti et al., 1974 ). Therefore, we took advantage of NGT1-GFP as a reporter gene to examine a possible biological role for GlcNAc signaling. In particular, the ability of macrophage phagocytosis to induce Ngt1-GFP was examined because phagocytosis is known to induce hyphal growth (Lo et al., 1997 ; Lorenz et al., 2004 ). Phagolysosomes are also low in glucose and are likely to contain GlcNAc due to the degradation carbohydrate chains on glycoproteins or as a result of the cleavage of Candida cell wall chitin by acidic mammalian chitinase to release the GlcNAc subunits (see Discussion). As shown in Figure 3 ). These results indicate that the GlcNAc pathway is activated after phagocytosis and suggest that one aspect of the biological role for the response to GlcNAc is to signal cells to form hyphae after phagocytosis.
NGT1 Is Required for Efficient Growth on GlcNAc and Hyphal Induction Hydropathy analysis of the Ngt1 protein indicates that it contains 12 transmembrane domains, which is characteristic of transporter proteins and suggests that Ngt1 may act as a GlcNAc transporter. To test this possibility, a homozygous deletion strain was constructed in which both copies of NGT1 were deleted (C. albicans is a diploid organism). The deletion mutations were constructed in the BWP17 strain (Wilson et al., 1999 ) by replacing one allele of NGT1 with ARG4 and the other allele with HIS1. As shown in Figure 4
The ngt1Δ mutant was also defective in forming hyphae under the standard conditions of 2.5 mM GlcNAc. The defect was examined further by testing whether cells can form hyphae at higher concentrations of GlcNAc. The rationale for this is based on the previous observation that cells with a mutation in the galactose transporter can grow at high concentrations of galactose, but not at lower doses that are still permissive for growth of wild-type cells (Douglas and Condie, 1954 ). Alternatively, some transporter-type proteins have been found to transduce a separate signal pathway (e.g., glucose or ammonium; Holsbeeks et al., 2004 ; Wu et al., 2006 ). To distinguish between these possibilities, cells were examined after growth in different concentrations of GlcNAc. Interestingly, ngt1Δ mutants started forming hyphae in response to 100 mM GlcNAc, which was ≥1000-fold higher than the concentration required for wild-type cells to form hyphae (Figure 5 ). Hyphal formation at 100 mM was still specific to GlcNAc and was not seen with dextrose or galactose (data not shown). GlcNAc, 100 mM, is not an unusually high level of sugar; yeast medium typically contains ~111 mM dextrose (2% wt/vol). The mutant phenotypes were complemented by reintroduction of a wild-type copy of NGT1, and the ngt1Δ mutant could form hyphae efficiently in response to serum, which demonstrate that the effects of this mutation are specific to the GlcNAc response.
NGT1 Is Required for GlcNAc Transport in C. albicans To gain further support for the idea that Ngt1 mediates GlcNAc transport, we examined the ability of the mutant cells to take up radioactive GlcNAc. Previous studies have demonstrated that glucose-grown cells do not display significant GlcNAc uptake and that cells must first be pregrown in GlcNAc for several hours to induce the transporter function (Singh and Datta, 1978 , 1979 ). Therefore, we analyzed the ability of wild-type and of ngt1Δ cells to take up [3H]GlcNAc after being incubated for 4 h in medium containing either glucose or GlcNAc. Cells were then washed and resuspended in basal yeast medium without sugar (BYNB). Aliquots of cells were incubated for different times with [3H]GlcNAc and then rapidly harvested by filtration. Quantitation of the results by scintillation counting clearly demonstrated that GlcNAc-grown wild-type cells take up GlcNAc very efficiently, but that the ngt1Δ mutants only took up very low levels of GlcNAc (Figure 6
NGT1 Promotes GlcNAc Uptake When Expressed in S. cerevisiae To more directly confirm that Ngt1 mediates GlcNAc uptake, we took advantage of the fact that S. cerevisiae lacks the ability to transport GlcNAc (Singh and Datta, 1979 ). The NGT1 gene was therefore placed under control of the galactose-regulated GAL1 promoter in plasmid p426GAL1 and transformed into S. cerevisiae strain W303. Cells were then cultured in glucose or galactose medium and then prepared for GlcNAc uptake assays. The results demonstrated that S. cerevisiae cells carrying the GAL1-NGT1 plasmid rapidly took up high levels of GlcNAc when grown in galactose medium (Figure 7
Ngt1 Is Specific for GlcNAc Transport The specificity of transport by Ngt1 was examined by assaying the ability of various sugars to compete for the uptake of radioactive GlcNAc in S. cerevisiae cells that were induced to express NGT1. For this analysis, cells were incubated in a reaction mix that contained 200 μM [3H]GlcNAc and either a 10-fold (2 mM) or 100-fold (20 mM) excess of a nonradioactive competitor sugar. Addition of a 10-fold excess of nonradioactive GlcNAc was sufficient to strongly reduce the uptake of the [3H]GlcNAc, as expected (Figure 8
Ngt1 Homologues Because there have been no previous reports of a eukaryotic GlcNAc transporter, we performed BLAST searches and found Ngt1 homologues in diverse organisms including plants and metazoans. Interestingly, C. albicans Ngt1 showed much higher conservation with the homologues from the plants Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa (>41% identity) than it did with the metazoan homologues (≤ 25% identity). The metazoan homologues were mainly conserved between residues 100–235, which includes transmembrane domains 2–6 that play a major role in solute recognition in the lacY lactose transporter (Abramson et al., 2004 ). The closer similarity of fungal and plant Ngt1 homologues was very unexpected, because fungi are much more closely related to metazoans than they are to plants (Figure 9 ). This suggests that there may have been selective pressure to maintain the similarity of Ngt1 in plants and fungi. Alternatively, it is intriguing to speculate that there may have been horizontal gene transfer. The plant Ngt1 homologues clustered most closely with those from plant pathogenic fungi (e.g., Ustilago maydis) in a phylogenetic tree generated by Clustal W.
Analysis of the Fungal Kingdom indicates that the ability to utilize GlcNAc was lost independently in several lineages. Ngt1 homologues were detected in three of the five major divisions of the fungi (Figure 9 ). In a second class of the Ascomycota (Taphrinomycotina), an NGT1 homolog was detected in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe but not in the related Schizosaccharomyces japonica. Neither contains homologues of the GlcNAc catabolic genes, and S. pombe was not able to grow in GlcNAc medium. In contrast, an NGT1 homolog was readily detected in all 22 members of the Pezizomycotina class (e.g., A. fumigatis and Neurospora crassa), which includes many plant and animal pathogens. Although many pathogenic fungi contain NGT1, the correlation is not 100% because the human pathogen Candida glabrata and the plant pathogen Ashbya gossypii lack homologues for NGT1 and the GlcNAc catabolic genes.DISCUSSION GlcNAc plays important roles in cell signaling in a wide range of cells in addition to serving as a source of nutrition. In metazoans, GlcNAc is a sensor of nutrient status that is involved in insulin signaling, cell cycle control, and other essential processes. Modulation of GlcNAc levels promotes O-linked attachment of GlcNAc to serine or threonine residues on proteins as a regulatory modification that is analogous to phosphorylation (Slawson and Hart, 2003 ; Zachara and Hart, 2006 ). In C. albicans, GlcNAc induces the formation of hyphal cells, which is an underlying virulence trait as budding and hyphal cells are thought to carry out unique roles during infection. In addition to different morphologies, budding and hyphal cells differ in the expression of virulence factors (Nantel et al., 2002 ; Lorenz et al., 2004 ), such as adhesin proteins, secreted hydrolytic enzymes, and antioxidant enzymes (Hube, 2004 ; Whiteway and Oberholzer, 2004 ; Kumamoto and Vinces, 2005 ). Therefore, in this study we used mass spectrometry to identify plasma membrane proteins in budding cells and GlcNAc-stimulated hyphae, which have the potential to mediate interaction with the host environment and contribute to the infectious process. One protein was selected for detailed analysis and was subsequently named Ngt1 for its role as an N-acetylglucosamine transporter. Ngt1 was also found to mediate GlcNAc-induced hyphal formation in C. albicans. These results are also significant in that Ngt1 represents the first eukaryotic GlcNAc transporter to be identified. This will make it possible to examine the role of homologues present in a wide range of organisms from yeast to plants and animals for their function in GlcNAc transport and signaling.Ngt1-GFP Induction by GlcNAc Ngt1-GFP was specifically induced by GlcNAc, and not by the switch to hyphal growth, because Ngt1-GFP was not induced in serum-stimulated hyphae (Figure 1 ; Singh et al., 2001 ; Yamada-Okabe et al., 2001 ). However, NGT1 is on Chromosome 6 and is thus not linked to the other catabolic genes (NAG1, DACX1, and HXK1), which are present in a cluster on Chromosome 3 (Kumar et al., 2000 ; Yamada-Okabe et al., 2001 ). Attempts to identify a common DNA sequence motif in the upstream regions of these genes using MEME (Bailey and Elkan, 1994 ) were inconclusive.Ngt1 Functions as a GlcNAc Transporter The predicted amino acid sequence of Ngt1 indicates that it is a transporter of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS; Pao et al., 1998 ; Abramson et al., 2004 ). One hallmark of MFS transporters is that they contain 12 transmembrane domains. Hydrophathy analysis of Ngt1 readily identified 11 transmembrane domains, and a twelfth transmembrane domain was identified as an amphipathic helix in which the polar side presumably faces the helix bundle to shield it from the nonpolar membrane environment. Ngt1 also contains a close match to the consensus sequence (GTXXNXXGXRXXL) that is commonly found in intracellular loop 1 of MFS transporters (Pao et al., 1998 ).A homozygous ngt1Δ deletion mutant was defective in growing on GlcNAc medium (Figure 4 ; Kim and Johnston, 2006 ). Therefore, we took advantage of the fact that S. cerevisiae lacks the ability to transport GlcNAc (Singh and Datta, 1978 , 1979 ) to use it as a heterologous expression system. S. cerevisiae cells expressing NGT1 displayed rapid GlcNAc uptake that was similar to the levels seen in C. albicans. The specificity of Ngt1 transport function was confirmed in a competition assay in which closely related sugars such as glucosamine and N-acetylmannosamine did not outcompete the uptake of [3H]GlcNAc. These results, combined with the similarity of Ngt1 to MFS transporters, demonstrate that Ngt1 is a GlcNAc-specific transporter.Role of Ngt1 in Hyphal Growth Stimulated by GlcNAc The initial observation that ngt1Δ cells were defective in forming hyphae under standard GlcNAc induction conditions (~2 mM) demonstrated that Ngt1 is involved in promoting this morphological change. However, it was not clear from this whether Ngt1 acts only as a transporter and that cells respond to increased intracellular levels of GlcNAc or if Ngt1 activates a separate signal pathway to induce hyphal formation. Many transporter proteins have been shown recently to also act as signal transducers (Holsbeeks et al., 2004 ; Moriya and Johnston, 2004 ; Wu et al., 2006 ). For example, the C. albicans Mep2 ammonium permease activates the Cph1 MAP kinase and the cAMP kinase pathways that induce hyphal growth (Biswas and Morschhauser, 2005 ). However, it is not necessary for Ngt1 to transduce a separate signal. An ngt1Δ mutant could be induced to form hyphae by exposing cells to 1000-fold higher concentrations of GlcNAc than were required to stimulate hyphal formation in the wild type (Figure 5 ). Thus, it appears that the primary role of Ngt1 is to facilitate high-affinity transport of GlcNAc.The ability of C. albicans cells to form hyphae in response to elevated GlcNAc, but not to exogenously added glucosamine or fructose, suggests that the intracellular signal is an upstream component such as GlcNAc itself. GlcNAc taken up by C. albicans is converted to GlcNAc-6-PO4 and then deacetylated to glucosamine-6-PO4 and deamidated to fructose-6-PO4. One model for how GlcNAc signaling may occur is based on galactose regulation in S. cerevisiae. Cells respond to elevated intracellular galactose, which acts together with ATP and Gal3 to relieve the inhibition of the Gal4 transcription factor by its negative regulator Gal80 (Sil et al., 1999 ). Another possibility is based on GlcNAc signaling in metazoan cells, in which elevated GlcNAc levels stimulate signal transduction via O-GlcNAc modification of proteins (Slawson and Hart, 2003 ; Zachara and Hart, 2006 ). However, this modification has not been reported in fungi, so it remains to be determined how the GlcNAc signal is propagated in C. albicans.Role of Ngt1 during Macrophage Phagocytosis The biological role for GlcNAc signaling in C. albicans has not been well defined; the ability of GlcNAc to induce hyphae was discovered in a search for a chemically defined inducers in vitro (Simonetti et al., 1974 ). Subsequent studies revealed that the GlcNAc catabolism genes (HXK1, DAC1, and NAG1) contribute to the virulence of C. albicans in a mouse tail-vein injection model of pathogenesis (Singh et al., 2001 ; Yamada-Okabe et al., 2001 ). The GlcNAc catabolic genes are repressed in serum, which contains glucose, but C. albicans also grows in low glucose environments such as the macrophage phagolysosome (Lorenz et al., 2004 ). Interestingly, Ngt1-GFP was induced after macrophage phagocytosis (Figure 3 ). The correlation between GlcNAc induction and phagocytosis is also strengthened by the observation that 6 of the 10 GlcNAc-induced proteins identified with highest confidence by mass spectrometry correspond to genes that were induced by macrophage phagocytosis. However, the ngt1Δ mutant was still capable of forming hyphae after phagocytosis (F.J.A. and J.B.K., unpublished data), indicating either that GlcNAc levels are very high or that other hyphal inducers are present in the phagolysosome. Perhaps multiple signals stimulate hyphal growth after phagocytosis to ensure an effective response to the hostile phagolysosomal environment. The importance of evading host defenses may also explain why such a variety of different stimuli can induce hyphal growth in vitro. Future studies on GlcNAc signaling in C. albicans will help define how various stimuli are integrated to regulate hyphal growth and will also serve as a model for defining the role of GlcNAc regulation in other organisms.Ngt1 Homologues The identification of Ngt1 as a GlcNAc transporter made it possible to search for homologues in other organisms (Figure 9 ). Many human and plant fungal pathogens contain NGT1 and the GlcNAc catabolic genes, but they are not required for all pathogens since C. glabrata and A. gossypii lack homologues for these genes.NGT1 homologues were also detected in two very divergent branches of multicellular organisms, plants and metazoans. Surprisingly, C. albicans Ngt1 showed much higher conservation with the plants homologues, given that fungi are much more closely related to metazoans (James et al., 2006 ). Current models assume that GlcNAc levels in metazoans are regulated indirectly by other nutritional effects. Thus, the discovery of Ngt1 homologues in metazoans broadens the possible functions of GlcNAc signaling to include intercellular communication. In this regard it is interesting that as part of a full-genome RNAi study in Caenorhabditis elegans interference of an Ngt1 homolog caused defects in early embryogenesis (Sonnichsen et al., 2005 ). Other metazoan homologues have not been studied, but they are apparently expressed since they are represented in cDNA libraries. It will therefore be important to determine the role of Ngt1 homologues, given the essential role that GlcNAc signaling plays in biomedically important processes such as insulin signaling, cell cycle control, and proteosome regulation (Slawson and Hart, 2003 ; Zachara and Hart, 2004 , 2006 ).[Supplemental Material]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Scott Filler for providing plasmids, strains and advice; James Bliska, Hana Fukuto, and Kate Klein for assistance with growing J774 cells; and Lois Douglas for advice and comments on the manuscript. We also thank the reviewers for their helpful suggestions. This work was supported by Grant RO1 AI47837 from the National Institutes of Health that was awarded to J.B.K. Footnotes This article was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-10-0931) on December 27, 2006. ![]() The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).REFERENCES
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 16; 101(46):16322-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2006 Aug; 188(16):5851-8.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]J Bacteriol. 2006 Jul; 188(14):5212-9.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003 Oct; 13(5):631-6.
[Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 May-Jun; 1761(5-6):599-617.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Trends Microbiol. 2004 Jul; 12(7):317-24.
[Trends Microbiol. 2004]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Aug; 7(4):350-7.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004]Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Aug; 29(2):239-44.
[Clin Infect Dis. 1999]Curr Drug Targets. 2005 Dec; 6(8):863-74.
[Curr Drug Targets. 2005]Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 15; 42(2):244-51.
[Clin Infect Dis. 2006]Nature. 1974 Jul 26; 250(464):344-6.
[Nature. 1974]Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Apr; 16(4):1971-86.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2005]Curr Genet. 2003 Oct; 44(1):1-7.
[Curr Genet. 2003]Trends Microbiol. 2004 Jul; 12(7):317-24.
[Trends Microbiol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2005 Nov 22; 15(22):2021-6.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Nature. 1974 Jul 26; 250(464):344-6.
[Nature. 1974]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19; 97(26):14218-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Infect Immun. 2001 Dec; 69(12):7898-903.
[Infect Immun. 2001]Eur J Biochem. 2001 Apr; 268(8):2498-505.
[Eur J Biochem. 2001]Methods Enzymol. 1991; 194():3-21.
[Methods Enzymol. 1991]Eukaryot Cell. 2005 Jul; 4(7):1203-10.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2005]Yeast. 2001 Jun 30; 18(9):859-64.
[Yeast. 2001]J Bacteriol. 1999 Mar; 181(6):1868-74.
[J Bacteriol. 1999]Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov; 14(11):7245-55.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1994]Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Oct; 18(10):5981-91.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1998]Yeast. 2000 Jan 15; 16(1):65-70.
[Yeast. 2000]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 25; 22(25):5767-8.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5; 215(3):403-10.
[J Mol Biol. 1990]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11; 22(22):4673-80.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]Nature. 1974 Jul 26; 250(464):344-6.
[Nature. 1974]Cell. 1997 Sep 5; 90(5):939-49.
[Cell. 1997]Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Oct; 3(5):1076-87.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2004]J Bacteriol. 1999 Mar; 181(6):1868-74.
[J Bacteriol. 1999]J Bacteriol. 1954 Dec; 68(6):662-70.
[J Bacteriol. 1954]Trends Biochem Sci. 2004 Oct; 29(10):556-64.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2004]J Cell Biol. 2006 May 8; 173(3):327-31.
[J Cell Biol. 2006]Cell Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 4(8):461-9.
[Cell Microbiol. 2002]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Sep 14; 84(1):58-64.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Oct 19; 557(1):248-58.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Oct 19; 557(1):248-58.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979]Mol Membr Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug; 21(4):227-36.
[Mol Membr Biol. 2004]Nature. 2006 Oct 19; 443(7113):818-22.
[Nature. 2006]Trends Genet. 2006 Jul; 22(7):375-87.
[Trends Genet. 2006]Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003 Oct; 13(5):631-6.
[Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 May-Jun; 1761(5-6):599-617.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Mol Biol Cell. 2002 Oct; 13(10):3452-65.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2002]Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Oct; 3(5):1076-87.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2004]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Aug; 7(4):336-41.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19; 97(26):14218-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Infect Immun. 2001 Dec; 69(12):7898-903.
[Infect Immun. 2001]Eur J Biochem. 2001 Apr; 268(8):2498-505.
[Eur J Biochem. 2001]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Mar; 62(1):1-34.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998]Mol Membr Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug; 21(4):227-36.
[Mol Membr Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10; 101(6):1572-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 8; 281(36):26144-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Sep 14; 84(1):58-64.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Oct 19; 557(1):248-58.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979]Trends Biochem Sci. 2004 Oct; 29(10):556-64.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10; 101(6):1572-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]J Cell Biol. 2006 May 8; 173(3):327-31.
[J Cell Biol. 2006]Mol Microbiol. 2005 May; 56(3):649-69.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Sep 14; 84(1):58-64.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Nov; 19(11):7828-40.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003 Oct; 13(5):631-6.
[Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 May-Jun; 1761(5-6):599-617.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Nature. 1974 Jul 26; 250(464):344-6.
[Nature. 1974]Infect Immun. 2001 Dec; 69(12):7898-903.
[Infect Immun. 2001]Eur J Biochem. 2001 Apr; 268(8):2498-505.
[Eur J Biochem. 2001]Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Oct; 3(5):1076-87.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2004]Trends Genet. 2006 Jul; 22(7):375-87.
[Trends Genet. 2006]Nature. 2006 Oct 19; 443(7113):818-22.
[Nature. 2006]Nature. 2005 Mar 24; 434(7032):462-9.
[Nature. 2005]Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003 Oct; 13(5):631-6.
[Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003]Trends Cell Biol. 2004 May; 14(5):218-21.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2004]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 May-Jun; 1761(5-6):599-617.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5; 215(3):403-10.
[J Mol Biol. 1990]Nature. 2006 Oct 19; 443(7113):818-22.
[Nature. 2006]Trends Genet. 2006 Jul; 22(7):375-87.
[Trends Genet. 2006]