![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 The Authors; Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Acid pH activation of the PmrA/PmrB two-component regulatory system of Salmonella enterica 1Program in Molecular Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8230, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St Louis, MO 63110, USA 2Department of Molecular Microbiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8230, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St Louis, MO 63110, USA *for correspondence. E-mail groisman/at/borcim.wustl.edu; Tel. (+1) 314 362 3692; Fax (+1) 314 747 8228. Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. Accepted October 31, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Acid pH often triggers changes in gene expression. However, little is known about the identity of the gene products that sense fluctuations in extracytoplasmic pH. The Gram-negative pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium experiences a number of acidic environments both inside and outside animal hosts. Growth in mild acid (pH 5.8) promotes transcription of genes activated by the response regulator PmrA, but the signalling pathway(s) that mediates this response has thus far remained unexplored. Here we report that this activation requires both PmrA's cognate sensor kinase PmrB, which had been previously shown to respond to Fe3+ and Al3+, and PmrA's post-translational activator PmrD. Substitution of a conserved histidine or of either one of four conserved glutamic acid residues in the periplasmic domain of PmrB severely decreased or abolished the mild acid-promoted transcription of PmrA-activated genes. The PmrA/PmrB system controls lipopolysaccharide modifications mediating resistance to the antibiotic polymyxin B. Wild-type Salmonella grown at pH 5.8 were > 100 000-fold more resistant to polymyxin B than organisms grown at pH 7.7. Our results suggest that protonation of the PmrB periplasmic histidine and/or of the glutamic acid residues activate the PmrA protein, and that mild acid promotes cellular changes resulting in polymyxin B resistance. Introduction Free-living organisms often encounter wide variations in the pH of their surroundings. Thus, pH may act as a signal that triggers cellular responses designed to cope with a new environment. The Gram-negative bacterium Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, for example, experiences a number of acidic environments both inside and outside animal hosts. During infection of a mammalian host, Salmonella is exposed to severe acidity in the stomach (Rychlik and Barrow, 2005) and mild acidification in the endocytic vacuoles of intestinal epithelia and macrophages (Brumell and Grinstein, 2004). Moreover, Salmonella has been recovered from soil and water (Winfield and Groisman, 2003) where the pH can be significantly low. While growth in acidic conditions has been shown to promote changes in the gene expression profiles of several bacterial species (Tucker et al., 2002; McGowan et al., 2003; Weinrick et al., 2004; Leaphart et al., 2006), less is known about the identity of the molecule(s) that sense extracytoplasmic fluctuations in pH and the mechanisms by which such sensors promote changes in gene expression. Previous studies have revealed that Salmonella responds to acidic challenges through an adaptive system called the acid tolerance response in which adaptation to mild acid conditions enables the organism to survive periods of severe acid stress (Foster and Hall, 1990; Foster, 1995). The acid tolerance response of Salmonella results in the synthesis of over 50 acid shock proteins (Bearson et al., 1998) that are likely to function primarily when variations in internal pH occur, i.e. when Salmonella experiences severe acidic conditions (pH ~3) (Foster, 2004). Growth of Salmonella in mild acid (pH 5.8) also promotes transcription of genes regulated by the response regulator PmrA (Soncini and Groisman, 1996). The expression of these genes has been shown to be dispensable for the acid tolerance response (Bearson et al., 1998) which suggests that there are still uncharacterized cellular function(s) that Salmonella needs to regulate in acidic environments. The PmrA protein and its cognate sensor kinase PmrB form a two-component regulatory system that is required for virulence in mice (Gunn et al., 2000), infection of chicken macrophages (Zhao et al., 2002), growth in soil (Chamnongpol et al., 2002), resistance to the cationic peptide antibiotic polymyxin B (Roland et al., 1993) and resistance to Fe3+- (Wosten et al., 2000) and Al3+-mediated killing (Nishino et al., 2006). The PmrA-regulated products characterized thus far mediate modifications to the various components of the lipopolysacharide (LPS) structure including the lipid A (Gunn et al., 1998; Trent et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2001; Breazeale et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2004), the core region (Nishino et al., 2006) and the O-antigen (Delgado et al., 2006). While other PmrA-regulated genes have been identified (Marchal et al., 2004; Tamayo et al., 2005), their biochemical activities and the role(s) that they play in Salmonella's life remain unknown. Besides mild acid pH, two other stimuli are known to promote expression of PmrA-activated genes: (i) submillimolar levels of extracellular Fe3+ or Al3+, which are directly sensed by the PmrB protein (Wosten et al., 2000), and (ii) low concentrations of extracellular Mg2+ (Soncini and Groisman, 1996) (Fig. 1
Results Mild acid pH induces transcription of PmrA-regulated genes To examine the mild acid pH induction of PmrA-activated genes, we grew Salmonella cells harbouring chromosomal lacZYA transcriptional fusions to the PmrA-regulated genes pbgP, pmrC and ugd (Wosten and Groisman, 1999) in N-minimal media buffered at pH 5.8 or 7.7. This medium lacked Fe3+ or Al3+, the only known PmrB ligands (Wosten et al., 2000), and contained 10 mM MgCl2, which represses expression of PmrA-activated genes (Soncini and Groisman, 1996; Kox et al., 2000). All three genes were expressed when cells were grown in media buffered at pH 5.8 but not at pH 7.7 (Fig. 2A–C
The transcriptional activation of PmrA-regulated genes taking place at pH 5.8 could be due to trace amounts of metals such as Fe3+, which is more soluble at acidic pH. To rule out this possibility, we treated the culture medium with Chelex 100 resin, an agent known to chelate polyvalent metal ions that does not affect Salmonella growth. We determined that Chelex 100 was effective at chelating iron because expression of the pmrA-independent iron-repressed iroA gene (Hall and Foster, 1996) was induced to higher levels in cultures treated with Chelex 100 (Fig. 2D We determined that the regulatory protein PmrA is required for the transcriptional activation in response to mild acid pH because there was no induction of the three investigated genes in a pmrA mutant (Fig. 2A–C The PmrB protein is necessary for the mild acid activation of PmrA The PmrB protein is necessary for activation of the PmrA protein in low Mg2+ (Kox et al., 2000; Kato and Groisman, 2004) and in the presence of Fe3+ (Wosten et al., 2000), consistent with the notion that PmrB is the major phosphodonor for PmrA. We investigated whether PmrB was also required for the pH-dependent induction of pbgP, which was chosen as a prototypical PmrA-activated gene because the PmrA protein binds to the pbgP promoter in vitro (Wosten and Groisman, 1999) and in vivo (Shin and Groisman, 2005). Thus, we determined the β-galactosidase activity of isogenic pmrB strains harbouring a chromosomal pbgP–lac transcriptional fusion: expression was approximately sixfold lower in a pmrB mutant than in the pmrB+ strain following growth at pH 5.8 (Fig. 3
There was residual pbgP expression in the pmrB mutant induced with mild acid pH (Fig. 3 The PmrD protein is necessary for normal PmrA activation at pH 5.8 The PhoP-activated PmrD protein favours the phosphorylated state of the PmrA protein (Fig. 1 We examined transcription of the pmrD gene using RNA isolated from organisms grown at pH 5.8 or 7.7. Growth at pH 5.8 resulted in pmrD transcript levels that were ~3.5-fold higher than in organisms grown at pH 7.7 (Fig. 4A
Conserved histidine and glutamic acid residues in the periplasmic domain of PmrB are required for signalling in response to mild acid pH The results described above established that PmrB is required for activation of PmrA in response to mild acid pH. This could be because PmrB is directly involved in sensing extracytoplasmic pH in a way analogous to its sensing of Fe3+ and Al3+ (Wosten et al., 2000), or because PmrB plays an indirect role in its capacity of main (if not sole) phosphodonor for PmrA. In fact, PmrB is required for the activation of PmrA-regulated genes in response to the low Mg2+ signal, which is sensed by the PhoQ protein (Kato and Groisman, 2004) (Fig. 1
An alignment of the amino acid sequences corresponding to the putative periplasmic domain of the PmrB proteins from six enteric species revealed that nine residues are highly conserved (Fig. 6A
Four of the nine conserved amino acids in the periplasmic domain of PmrB are glutamic acid residues, which also could be subjected to changes in protonation upon variations in the pH of their surroundings. Although the pKa of free glutamic acid is ~4, which is well below the range of pH at which PmrA-activated genes are induced, the folding of a protein can dramatically change the pKa of its residues. For instance, the pKa of one of the glutamic acid residues of the regulatory protein TraM is ~7.7 (Lu et al., 2006). Therefore, we hypothesized that one or more of the glutamates might be required for pH sensing. To test this hypothesis, we used plasmids that produced PmrB proteins containing single-amino-acid replacements in the conserved glutamic acid residues. When either one of the four conserved glutamates was substituted by alanine Salmonella could no longer respond to mild acid pH (Fig. 6B Mild acid pH induces resistance to the antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B What role could the mild acid pH-dependent activation of PmrA-regulated genes play in Salmonella's lifestyle? Because the PmrA/PmrB system is required for resistance to the antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B (Roland et al., 1993), we hypothesized that mild acid pH could induce this resistance. In fact, the survival of wild-type cells to a challenge with polymyxin B was 100 000-fold higher when they were grown at pH 5.8 than when grown at pH 7.7 (Fig. 7
Discussion We have established that the sensor kinase PmrB is the primary sensor that activates the PmrA protein when Salmonella experiences mild acid pH, resulting in transcription of PmrA-activated genes (Fig. 1 The requirement of periplasmic PmrB residues in the mild acid pH activation of PmrA-regulated genes suggests that this signalling pathway responds to changes in extracytoplasmic pH. Moreover, under the experimental conditions used in this study it is unlikely that the cytoplasmic pH varied significantly because: first, bacterial cells can maintain an internal pH of up to 2 units higher than the external pH (Foster, 2004); in fact, Slonczewski et al. (1981) determined that the intracellular pH in Escherichia coli cells was 7.4 even when the external pH was 5.5. Second, acid stress can become a severe challenge for bacterial cells when organic acids such as acetate or products of fermentation are present in the medium (Bearson et al., 1998); and in our experiments we used a non-fermentable sugar (glycerol) and inorganic acids which are not expected to cause such acid stress. Structural changes driven by a relatively narrow variation in pH (1–2 units) have been reported for several cytosolic bacterial proteins (Tews et al., 2005; Lu et al., 2006). This is in contrast to the few membrane proteins (other than ion channels) that have been shown to respond to changes in extracellular pH of a similar magnitude. For example, the eukaryotic G-protein coupled receptor OGR1 is inactive at pH 7.8 and fully active at pH 6.8 suggesting that the pH sensing mechanism involves protonation of several extracytoplasmic histidines (Ludwig et al., 2003), which is in agreement with the pKa of free histidine of ~6. In the case of PmrB, a normal response to mild acid pH requires not only a periplasmic histidine but also several glutamic acid residues. Therefore, regulation of PmrB activity may involve protonation of one or more of these amino acids. Even though protonation of the glutamic acid residues may seem unlikely given the fact that the pKa of free glutamic acid is ~4, protein folding can change the pKa of its residues (Tanford and Roxby, 1972). Indeed, the pKa of one of the glutamic acid residues of the regulatory protein TraM is ~7.7 in the folded protein (Lu et al., 2006). Therefore, it is plausible that protonation/deprotonation of one or more of the glutamic acids in the periplasmic domain of PmrB could occur at pH ~5.8. Integral membrane proteins that recognize signals in addition to extracytoplasmic pH, such as PmrB, have been identified both in prokaryotes and in eukaryotes. The CadC protein of E. coli, for example, is activated by exogenous lysine besides acid pH (Dell et al., 1994). Likewise, the human receptor OGR1 responds to both pH and sphingosylphosphorylcholine (Ludwig et al., 2003). The fact that the PmrB H35A and the E64A mutant proteins displayed partial activity in response to ferric iron but were severely impaired in their ability to respond to acid pH (compare Fig. 6B and D The PmrB protein plays the primary role in the pH-dependent activation of PmrA, but full activation also requires PmrD, the post-translational activator of the PmrA protein (Fig. 3 What role could the pH-dependent activation of PmrA-regulated genes play in Salmonella's lifestyle? Because several PmrA-activated gene products are responsible for remodelling the LPS structure and these modifications are required for resistance to certain antimicrobial peptides and toxic metals, one possibility is that acidic environments provide a means to induce the cell envelope changes resulting in resistance. Indeed, when grown at pH 5.8 wild-type Salmonella were 100 000-fold more resistant to polymyxin B than when grown at pH 7.7 (Fig. 7 Experimental procedures Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. All S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains are derived from wild-type 14028s and were constructed by phage P22-mediated transductions as described elsewhere (Davis et al., 1980). Bacteria were grown at 37°C in N-minimal media (Snavely et al., 1991) buffered in 50 mM Bis-Tris (or MES), pH 7.7 or 5.8, supplemented with 0.1% casamino acids, 38 mM glycerol and 10 μM or 10 mM MgCl2. When indicated, medium was treated overnight with Chelex 100 resin (Sigma) to chelate metal ions before using it for cell culture. Deferoxamine mesylate (Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 300 μM. FeSO4 was used at 100 μM. E. coli DH5α was used as the host for preparation of plasmid DNA. Ampicillin and kanamycin were used at 50 μg ml−1 and chloramphenicol was used at 20 μg ml−1.
Construction of chromosomal gene deletion mutants and plasmids Strain EG16443, which has a deletion of both the ackA and pta genes, was constructed by the one-step gene inactivation method (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000) as follows: a CmR cassette was amplified using primers 5956 (5′-CTGACGTTTTTTTAGCCACGTATCATAAATAGGTACTTCCGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC-3′) and 5957 (5′-TTACTGCTGCTGCTGAGAAGCCTGGATCGCCGTCAGGGCGCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG-3′) and pKD3 as template and recombined into the ackA pta region in strain 14028s. The structure of the generated mutant was verified by colony PCR as described elsewhere (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000). Plasmids pUHpmrAB containing the H35A and H57A substitutions were constructed using the QuickChange II Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) with primers 7075 (5′-AGTACCTTCTGGTTATGGGCTGAAAGCACTGAGCA-3′) and 7076 (5′-TGCTCAGTGCTTTCAGCCCATAACCAGAAGGTACT-3′); 7077 (5′-AATCGCAACAACGATCGCGCTATCATGCACGAAAT-3′) and 7078 (5′-ATTTCGTGCATGATAGCGCGATCGTTGTTGCGATT-3′) respectively. β-Galactosidase assays Cells were grown overnight in N-minimal media, pH 7.7, and washed once in N-minimal media pH 7.7 or 5.8 before inoculation into media of the same pH. Activity was determined as described elsewhere (Miller, 1972) after 4 h of growth at 37°C. Immunoblotting analysis Cells were grown in 20 ml of N-minimal media, pH 7.7 or 5.8, to OD600~0.5, washed with TBS twice, resuspended in 500 μl of TBS and opened by sonication. Whole-cell lysates were run on NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) with MES running buffer, transferred to PVDF membranes and analysed by immunoblotting with an anti-PmrD polyclonal antibody. Blots were developed by using anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-linked antibodies (Amersham Biosciences) and Supersignal West Femto (Pierce). RNA isolation, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR Cells were grown in 10 ml of N-minimal media, pH 7.7 or 5.8, to OD600~0.5. One millilitre of culture was used to prepare total RNA using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega). cDNA was synthesized using TaqMan (Applied Biosystems) and random hexamers following the manufacturer's instructions. Quantification of transcripts was performed by real-time PCR using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) in an ABI 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Two different sets of primers were used to detect the pmrD transcript (both gave similar results): 4491 (5′-GGTTAAGAAATCGCATTATGTCAAAA-3′) and 4492 (5′-CGAACCGCCGCTATCG-3′); 6528 (5′-TGGAATGGTTGGTTAAGAAATCG-3′) and 6529 (5′-CATGGCACGCCCTCTTTTT-3′). Primers 6496 (5′-AGCGATAGGCATTGAGCAGC-3′) and 6497 (5′-CAGGTTTGCCGCGAAATTAG-3′) were used to detect the slyA transcript and 6213 (5′-GCTGGAAGTCGAGGAGTCACA-3′) and 6214 (5′-TCGTCCGGTTCGACCAAA-3′) to quantify the corA transcript. Results were normalized to the levels of 16S ribosomal RNA which were estimated using primers 3032 (5′-CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAAT-3′) and 3034 (5′-TTTACGCCCAGTAATTCCGATT-3′). The amount of each PCR product was calculated from standard curves obtained from PCR with the same primers and serially diluted DNA. Polymyxin B susceptibility assay Assays were performed following a previously described protocol (Groisman et al., 1992) with a few modifications. Bacteria were grown overnight in N-minimal media, pH 7.7, containing 10 mM MgCl2, and washed once in N-minimal media pH 7.7 or 5.8 before inoculation (1:50 dilution) into 10 ml of media of the same pH. Cells were grown at 37°C with aeration to OD600~0.6 and diluted 1:100 in LB broth. A 300 μg ml−1 stock solution of water-dissolved polymyxin B was diluted 1:100 in LB broth immediately before the assay. Fifty microlitres of diluted cells and 50 μl of diluted polymyxin B solution were mixed and placed in 96-well plates for 1 h at 37°C with shaking. A portion of each sample was serially diluted and plated on LB agar plates to determine the number of colony-forming units (cfu). Per cent survival was calculated as follows:
Acknowledgments We thank A. Kato for insightful suggestions, J.W. Foster for critically reading the manuscript and for providing the iroA–lacZ strain, and members of the Groisman lab for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported, in part, by Grant AI42336 from the NIH to E.A.G., who is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Nov; 29(5):1021-40.
[FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Feb; 7(1):78-84.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jul; 69(7):3687-94.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2002 Dec; 184(23):6551-8.
[J Bacteriol. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Jun; 48(5):1225-39.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 1990 Feb; 172(2):771-8.
[J Bacteriol. 1990]Crit Rev Microbiol. 1995; 21(4):215-37.
[Crit Rev Microbiol. 1995]J Bacteriol. 1998 May; 180(9):2409-17.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 2(11):898-907.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004]J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec; 178(23):6796-801.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]J Bacteriol. 1998 May; 180(9):2409-17.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Infect Immun. 2000 Nov; 68(11):6139-46.
[Infect Immun. 2000]Infect Immun. 2002 Sep; 70(9):5319-21.
[Infect Immun. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 45(3):711-9.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]Cell. 2000 Sep 29; 103(1):113-25.
[Cell. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec; 178(23):6796-801.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]Cell. 1996 Jan 12; 84(1):165-74.
[Cell. 1996]EMBO J. 2000 Apr 17; 19(8):1861-72.
[EMBO J. 2000]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2302-13.
[Genes Dev. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1999 Sep 17; 274(38):27185-90.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Cell. 2000 Sep 29; 103(1):113-25.
[Cell. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec; 178(23):6796-801.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]EMBO J. 2000 Apr 17; 19(8):1861-72.
[EMBO J. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1996 Oct; 178(19):5683-91.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2302-13.
[Genes Dev. 2004]EMBO J. 2000 Apr 17; 19(8):1861-72.
[EMBO J. 2000]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2302-13.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Cell. 2000 Sep 29; 103(1):113-25.
[Cell. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1999 Sep 17; 274(38):27185-90.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 11; 280(6):4089-94.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005 Mar; 69(1):12-50.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2302-13.
[Genes Dev. 2004]J Bacteriol. 1996 Sep; 178(17):5092-9.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]EMBO J. 2000 Apr 17; 19(8):1861-72.
[EMBO J. 2000]Cell. 2000 Sep 29; 103(1):113-25.
[Cell. 2000]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2302-13.
[Genes Dev. 2004]EMBO J. 2006 Jun 21; 25(12):2930-9.
[EMBO J. 2006]Cell. 2000 Sep 29; 103(1):113-25.
[Cell. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1993 Jul; 175(13):4154-64.
[J Bacteriol. 1993]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 2(11):898-907.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct; 78(10):6271-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981]J Bacteriol. 1998 May; 180(9):2409-17.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Science. 2005 May 13; 308(5724):1020-3.
[Science. 2005]EMBO J. 2006 Jun 21; 25(12):2930-9.
[EMBO J. 2006]Nature. 2003 Sep 4; 425(6953):93-8.
[Nature. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 1994 Oct; 14(1):7-16.
[Mol Microbiol. 1994]Nature. 2003 Sep 4; 425(6953):93-8.
[Nature. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 30; 281(26):17727-35.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1; 89(21):10079-83.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]J Bacteriol. 1998 May; 180(9):2409-17.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Sep; 4(9):705-9.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1964 Mar; 239():865-71.
[J Biol Chem. 1964]Mol Microbiol. 2005 Jan; 55(2):425-40.
[Mol Microbiol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 1998 May; 180(9):2409-17.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 15; 266(2):824-9.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6; 97(12):6640-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1992 Jan; 174(2):486-91.
[J Bacteriol. 1992]