• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plntphysLink to Publisher's site
Plant Physiol. Feb 2007; 143(2): 759–772.
PMCID: PMC1803737

Diversity and Evolution of CYCLOIDEA-Like TCP Genes in Relation to Flower Development in Papaveraceae[C][W][OA]


Monosymmetry evolved several times independently during flower evolution. In snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus), a key gene for monosymmetry is CYCLOIDEA (CYC), which belongs to the class II TCP gene family encoding transcriptional activators. We address the questions of the evolutionary history of this gene family and of possible recruitment of genes homologous to CYC in floral development and symmetry in the Papaveraceae. Two to three members of the class II TCP family were found in each species analyzed, two of which were CYC-like genes, on the basis of the presence of both the TCP and R conserved domains. The duplication that gave rise to these two paralogous lineages (named PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2) probably predates the divergence of the two main clades within the Papaveraceae. Phylogenetic relationships among angiosperm class II TCP genes indicated that (1) PAPACYL genes were closest to Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AtTCP18, and a duplication at the base of the core eudicot would have given rise to two supplementary CYC-like lineages; and (2) at least three class II TCP genes were present in the ancestor of monocots and eudicots. Semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization approaches in three species with different floral symmetry indicated that both PAPACYL paralogs were expressed during floral development. A pattern common to all three species was observed at organ junctions in inflorescences and flowers. Expression in the outer petals was specifically observed in the two species with nonactinomorphic flowers. Hypotheses concerning the ancestral pattern of expression and function of CYC-like genes and their possible role in floral development of Papaveraceae species leading to bisymmetric buds are discussed.

Organismal evolution has been punctuated by key innovations that constitute major driving forces for species diversification and colonization of new environmental niches. A key innovation in angiosperms is the flower, which brings together sterile and fertile organs in a condensed structure. Considerable work has been devoted to the identification of determinants of the identity of floral organs, leading to the ABCDE model (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Colombo et al., 1995; Pelaz et al., 2000). The molecular bases underlying the diversity of flower shape are far less understood (Weiss et al., 2005). Floral symmetry is presently the most investigated character (Cubas, 2004). Two main types of symmetry are described, actinomorphy or radial symmetry (or polysymmetry) and zygomorphy or bilateral symmetry (or monosymmetry). Zygomorphic flowers appear in late Cretaceous fossil records, which is relatively late comparatively to the accepted period for angiosperm origin (early Cretaceous [Endress, 1999]). Actinomorphy is considered as the ancestral state for angiosperms and zygomorphy has evolved several times independently, possibly in coevolution with specialized pollinators (Crepet, 1996). Changes in floral morphology and associated pollinators can set up reproductive isolation that may contribute to speciation. Indeed, some of the most species-rich taxa harbor zygomorphic flowers (Fabaceae, Orchidaceae, Asteraceae; Sargent, 2004).

Remarkable progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying floral symmetry has been achieved in the model species snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus). Snapdragon has pentameric flowers, with five petals fused in a tube ending in two lips, four fertile stamens, and a dorsal staminode. The petals are of three types, dorsal, lateral, and ventral, building a monosymmetric flower. Four genes have been characterized, whose interaction accounts for dorsoventral asymmetry (Corley et al., 2005). Mutation in the CYCLOIDEA (CYC) gene has the strongest phenotypic effect, with a loss of a full dorsal identity and a ventralization of the lateral petals. Together with its paralog DICHOTOMA (DICH), CYC is expressed in the dorsal domain of the early floral meristem, resulting in retarded growth of petals and stamen. At later stages, CYC expression persists throughout the dorsal domain, where it promotes petal lobe growth while it represses stamen development (Luo et al., 1995). DICH expression is restricted to the dorsal part of the dorsal petals, participating in their internal asymmetry (Luo et al., 1999). The dorsal effect of CYC and DICH appears largely mediated by another gene, RADIALIS (RAD). Indeed, RAD has been shown to be activated by CYC in the dorsal domain of floral meristems (Costa et al., 2005), where it acts antagonistically with DIVARICATA (DIV) that is expressed all over the meristem (Corley et al., 2005). DIV is responsible for the ventral identity of petals, which can be observed in actinomorphic flowers of the cyc-dich double mutant (Galego and Almeida, 2002; Almeida and Galego, 2005).

Both CYC and DICH belong to the TCP gene family that encodes transcriptional factors characterized by a conserved basic helix-loop-helix domain (TCP) unique to plants (Cubas et al., 1999a). Twenty-four TCP genes were found in the completely sequenced genomes of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa; Riechmann et al., 2000; Cubas, 2002; Damerval and Manuel, 2003; Xiong et al., 2005). Based on the characteristics of the TCP domain, two classes, I and II, were defined (Kosugi and Ohashi, 2002). CYC and DICH belong to class II, together with the TB1 gene that plays a role in branching and floral development in maize (Zea mays; Doebley et al., 1997). CYC, DICH, and TB1 share a conserved domain particularly rich in polar residues, the R domain, which is not encountered in all class II members (Cubas et al., 1999a).

That genes homologous to CYC may play a role in the evolution of floral symmetry in diverse taxa is an intriguing possibility that prompted the analysis of molecular evolution of class II TCP genes, at first in Asterids and more recently in other core eudicot taxa. In all, the evolution of the family has appeared quite complex, with taxon-specific duplications and gene losses (Citerne et al., 2000, 2003; Reeves and Olmstead, 2003; Howarth and Donoghue, 2005, 2006). Phylogenetic analyses do not support the presence of orthologs of CYC and DICH in non-Antirrhineae species (Damerval and Manuel, 2003; Gübitz et al., 2003). The duplication giving rise to these two paralogs would have occurred within the Veronicaceae before the divergence of the Antirrhineae (Gübitz et al., 2003) and the two paralogs would then have evolved through subfunctionalization (Hileman and Baum, 2003). Examples of involvement of CYC-like genes in floral symmetry are described among Antirrhineae species (Cubas et al., 1999b; Hileman et al., 2003).

The lack of a CYC ortholog in other taxa does not dismiss the hypothesis that similar genes may be repeatedly recruited for producing a similar trait. Actually, this was recently demonstrated in Papilionoideae, a Rosid taxon where zygomorphy is thought to have evolved independently from zygomorphy in the Asterids. In Fabaceae, the CYC closest lineages, LEGCYC1 and LEGCYC2, occurred from a duplication probably anterior to the evolution of the Papilionoideae, and the LEGCYC1 lineage underwent further duplication (LEGCYC1A and 1B; Citerne et al., 2003; Fukuda et al., 2003). It was recently demonstrated that a LEGCYC1B gene, LjCYC2, has dorsalizing activity during floral development of Lotus japonicus, similar to CYC (Feng et al., 2006). Similarly, molecular evolution results suggest that positive selection has been operating in LEGCYC1B lineage in relation to a shift in floral morphology among Lupinus species (Ree et al., 2004). Very recently, in Cadia purpurea, an actinomorphic papilionoid species, extension of the expression domain of LEGCYC1 genes was observed compared to its zygomorphic close relative Lupinus nanus, consistent with dorsalization of the whole flower (Citerne et al., 2006).

Outside the core eudicots, large clades with zygomorphic flowers exist among monocots (e.g. Orchidaceae). In contrast, zygomorphy is absent in basal angiosperms and quite rare in early diverging eudicots (Ranunculales, Proteales [Endress, 1999; Ronse De Craene et al., 2003]). Characterization of CYC-like genes in an early diverging eudicot taxon exhibiting diverse floral types would shed light on the evolutionary history of the TCP class II gene family and the recruitment of genes of this family in relation to floral symmetry in eudicots. Among the Ranunculales that are considered as the sister group to all other eudicots, the Papaveraceae sensu lato constitute a morphologically diverse monophyletic group (Hoot et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2004). Fumariaceae, including the basal genus Hypecoum, on the one hand, and Papaveraceae sensu stricto, on the other hand, are sister groups, with Pteridophyllum Sieb. and Zucc. being basal to both (Kadereit et al., 1995; Gleissberg and Kadereit, 1999; Fig. 1). The dimeric ground plan of the flower and especially the perianth with two sepals and two whorls of opposite decussate petals probably offers a favorable context for development of bisymmetric adult flowers through differentiation of the morphology of the two petal whorls. This is achieved in Fumariaceae, whereas Papaveraceae sensu stricto are characterized by actinomorphic flowers and the full enclosure of flower buds by the sepals (Kadereit et al., 1995). In addition, in Fumarioideae, zygomorphy occurs in monospur flowers.

Figure 1.
Simplified phylogeny of Papaveraceae sensu lato (sources of the tree [Liden et al., 1997; Gleissberg and Kadereit, 1999]), pointing to the study species. Images of adult flowers are shown, together with a floral diagram of the three species (L. spectabilis ...

In this article, we characterize class II TCP genes in the Papaveraceae sensu lato with a specific focus toward genes having both TCP and R domains, called CYC-like genes. Papaveraceae genes are then included in an extensive phylogeny of known class II TCP genes in an attempt to decipher the ancestral state of complexity of this gene family among angiosperms. Finally, using gene expression approaches in developing inflorescences and flowers, we address the question of ancestral expression and function for CYC-like genes and possible role in floral development and symmetry in the Papaveraceae sensu lato.


TCP Domain Characterization and Sequence Elongation in Papaveraceae Sensu Lato

To characterize class II TCP genes in the Papaveraceae, three combinations of degenerate primers arranged in nested PCRs were initially tested on Chelidonium majus and Lamprocapnos spectabilis, and about 20 clones were sequenced from each experiment (Fig. 2). It appeared that combination I was less powerful than the other two for retrieving different sequence types and thus only combinations II and III were used on all seven species for extensive clone sequencing (Table I). For every species, two to three sequence types could be defined, which differed by at least 19 among 85 nucleotides, except for CvA and CvC, which differed by 7 nucleotides. Some types were quite rare (e.g. type C in Hypecoum procumbens and Cysticapnos vesicarius) and would have been missed if the sequencing effort was lower. Each sequence type encoded a different amino acid sequence, which strongly suggested that they correspond to fragments of paralogs rather than alleles. Preliminary analysis of relationships of the 17 TCP types using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method indicated at least three well-supported groups. In particular, PrB and HpC appeared close to each other and very divergent from all other sequence types (Supplemental Fig. S1).

Figure 2.
Schematic drawing of a typical CYC-like gene. The TCP (177 nucleotides) and R (54 nucleotides) domains are boxed and the intermediary domain is represented by an interrupted line. Approximate positions of the various primers used to amplify TCP sequence ...
Table I.
Number of clones sequenced over all PCR primer combinations, number and relative frequencies of validated sequence types for the TCP domain in each species, and name of genes obtained following sequence elongation

A seminested PCR strategy enabled recovery of longer genomic sequences for all 17 types, except CmA, HpB and HpC, and PrA and PrB (Table I). Most of the R domain was sequenced (36 of 54 nucleotide positions). An inverse PCR strategy was successful on other sequence types, except HpC. The R domain was found about 200 to 250 nucleotides downstream of the TCP domain for CmA, HpB, and PrA. In the case of PrB, no R domain was found up to 850 nucleotides downstream of the TCP domain. A BLAST search showed similarity between this Pr3 elongated sequence and the CIN gene of snapdragon, a class II TCP gene devoid of an R domain (Nath et al., 2003). Because we were mostly interested in CYC-like genes (TCP genes with an R domain), we did not investigate further the HpC type that appeared very close to PrB from the preliminary phylogenetic analysis (Supplemental Fig. S1).

CYC-Like Sequences in Papaveraceae Sensu Lato

A first objective was to assess whether the 15 characterized CYC-like Papaveraceae genes could be orthologs of other known core eudicot genes. Evolutionary relationships were analyzed with the five Arabidopsis class II TCP genes with an R domain (Fig. 3A). Because it was not possible to confidently assess primary homology in the intermediary domain comprised between the TCP and R domains, analysis was conducted on the two most conserved domains only (174-nucleotide alignment matrix, comprising 78% and 67% of the complete TCP and R domains, respectively). NJ, maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian reconstruction methods were congruent, supporting a monophyletic group for all Papaveraceae sequences, split in two groups, each of which included one (two for C. vesicarius) sequence of each species. These two groups, however, were not highly supported in all three analyses (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.
Majority rule consensus trees obtained using Bayesian inference analyses of CYC-like class II TCP sequences. A, Analysis performed on the 174-nucleotide matrix restricted to TCP and R domains, including 15 Papaveraceae sensu lato and five Arabidopsis ...

To investigate in more detail the relationships among Papaveraceae CYC-like sequences, an alignment spanning the TCP, R, and intermediary domains was considered. Within the latter domain, a region where primary homology was difficult to assess was excluded, which resulted in a 381-position matrix, including gaps inserted to optimize alignment. Both NJ and Bayesian methods revealed two well-supported clades, including one (two in C. vesicarius) sequence of each species (Fig. 3B). Similar relationships were revealed by phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid-translated sequences (data not shown). This reveals the presence of two paralogous lineages in Papaveraceae sensu lato, hereafter named PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2, for Papaveraceae CYC-like genes 1 and 2.

In both PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2, the TCP and R domains were highly conserved. At the amino acid level, the percentage of identity among pairs of sequences for the TCP domain ranged from 72% to 98% in PAPACYL1 and 63% to 100% in PAPACYL2. For the R domain, values lay between 66 and 100% in PAPACYL1 and 58% to 92% in PAPACYL2. PAPACYL2 sequences were generally longer than PAPACYL1 (435 ± 33 nucleotides versus 388 ± 22 nucleotides), due to variable length of the intermediary domain. In Papaveraceae sensu stricto, this difference was quite limited, ranging from 3 to 27 nucleotides in Papaver rhoeas and C. majus, respectively. In Fumarioideae, the difference was much higher, ranging from 66 to 93 nucleotides in Capnoides sempervirens and C. vesicarius, respectively. Conversely, in H. procumbens, PAPACYL1 length exceeded PAPACYL2 by 24 nucleotides. This was congruent with the large divergence of H. procumbens sequences from their Fumarioideae orthologs in the phylogenetic analysis.

Relationships of Papaveraceae Sequences with Other Class II TCP Genes

We investigated relationships of Papaveraceae sensu lato genes, as represented by sequences of P. rhoeas, H. procumbens, and L. spectabilis, with 34 other known class II TCP genes, including the full repertoires of Arabidopsis and rice (see “Materials and Methods”). Phylogenetic analyses were performed on an alignment including the 3′ 138 nucleotides of the TCP domain and on the conceptual translation of this domain. Parsimony analysis of the 104 informative nucleotide characters produced 55 equally parsimonious trees of 902 steps with a consistency index of 0.273 and a retention index of 0.554, indicating fairly high homoplasy. The 50% majority rule consensus tree had poor resolution (data not shown). ML and Bayesian analyses resulted in very similar topologies. Both analyses set apart two main groups (posterior probability P = 1.0 in the Bayesian analysis; Fig. 4A). The first one (called the ECE clade, following Howarth and Donoghue [2006]) included 23 sequences, among which are three Arabidopsis and three rice genes. Within this group, resolution was low, except for a TB1-like clade comprising the two Poaceae TB1 genes and two related rice sequences (P = 1.0). The closest nonmonocot sequences to this subgroup appeared to be an Asterid sequence, LoTCP2, and AtTCP12. The Papaveraceae sequences were grouped with the Aquilegia CYC-like gene, Populus balsamifera TB1-like, AtTCP18, and the Lotus sequence LjCYC5, in a weakly supported cluster (P = 0.57). The second main group included most rice and Arabidopsis sequences (eight of 11 for both). A subclade included a CIN and P. rhoeas CIN-like sequence (Pr3) together with one rice and three Arabidopsis genes (P = 0.89). Well-supported subgroups included one rice and three Arabidopsis genes (AtTCP13-like; P = 1.0), and a set of six rice genes (P = 1.0). Most of these groups were also observed in the phylogenetic reconstruction by ML on amino acid-translated sequences (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.
Reconstruction of evolutionary history of class II TCP genes. The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) locus names for rice genes are OsTCP1, Os01g11550; OsTCP2, Os03g57190; OsTCP3, Os07g05720; OsTCP4, Os01g55750; OsTCP6, Os07g04510; OsTCP7, Os12g02090; ...

Expression of PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2 in Vegetative and Floral Organs

Expression analysis was undertaken in three species representative of each of the three types of floral symmetry encountered in the Papaveraceae sensu lato family: C. majus for actinomorphic, L. spectabilis for bisymmetric, and C. sempervirens for zygomorphic flowers (Fig. 1). Because zygomorphy was reported to begin to settle at the time of ovule development in Fumariaceae (Ronse De Craene and Smets, 1992), relatively late-stage floral buds (with well-differentiated stamens) were analyzed.

First, semiquantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was used to compare PAPACYL expression in leaves, early inflorescences, and flower buds of increasing size, with actin as a standard (Fig. 5). For a given species, both paralogs were generally shown to have low expression, with similar patterns. In C. majus, no expression was detected in leaves, whereas expression in the inflorescence decreased as development proceeded (Fig. 5A). In L. spectabilis and C. sempervirens, both paralogs were preferentially expressed in young leaves and in the first stage of developing inflorescence, where PAPACYL1 paralogs appeared more expressed than those of PAPACYL2 (Fig. 5, B and C).

Figure 5.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR profiles obtained for the two PAPACYL paralogs in young and mature leaf and in inflorescences and floral buds of increasing size in C. majus (A), L. spectabilis (B), and C. sempervirens (C). The actin gene was used in the three ...

Tissue-specific expression was further investigated by in situ hybridization on inflorescences and buds displaying PAPACYL expression in RT-PCR experiments (≤2-mm buds). For each studied species, expression of the two PAPACYL paralogs was compared to actin expression. As expected, actin was found ubiquitously expressed. In contrast, PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2 paralogs displayed restricted, tissue-specific expression (Fig. 6; Supplemental Fig. S2). In all the species, expression of the two PAPACYL paralogs appeared similar, even though in L. spectabilis mRNA accumulation seemed stronger for PAPACYL1 than PAPACYL2 (data not shown). A PAPACYL expression pattern common to the three species was clearly observed at the junction between bracts and pedicels or peduncles (Fig. 6B; Supplemental Fig. S2, C and D). Similar, common patterns appeared in the receptacle at the base of floral organs (Fig. 6, A, C, and H), although faint in C. sempervirens where it was reproducible only at the junction between sepals and receptacle (Fig. 6H; Supplemental Fig. S2B). Expression was also observed in the sepals (Fig. 6, A, C, and H; Supplemental Fig. S2E), but it was faint (although reproducible) in C. majus (Fig. 6A). For the two nonactinomorphic species (L. spectabilis [bisymmetric] and C. sempervirens [zygomorphic]), PAPACYL transcripts were also found in the tip and main part of the outer petals (Fig. 6, C, E, H, and I; Supplemental Fig. S2, E, G, and H). Interestingly, an asymmetric repartition of PAPACYL transcripts in the main part of the outer petals was often observed in the C. sempervirens monosymmetric species (Fig. 6I). Supplementary patterns were specific to L. spectabilis. LsCYL1 expression was observed at the basis of the dorsal ridge on the inner petals (Fig. 6C; Supplemental Fig. S2E). Moreover, very clear expression of LsCYL1 was apparent in the developing anther connective, sometimes surrounding the pollen sacs, whereas LsCYL2 expression was much fainter in the connective, but occurred in the first layer of the tapetum (Fig. 6, E–G). These results show that the two PAPACYL paralogs are expressed during inflorescence and flower development of the three Papaveraceae sensu lato studied species. Furthermore, they suggest a correlation between PAPACYL-specific patterns and flower symmetry.

Figure 6.
In situ hybridization analysis of PAPACYL gene expression in inflorescences and ≤2-mm flower buds of C. majus (actinomorphic flower), L. spectabilis (bisymmetric flower), and C. sempervirens (monosymmetric flower). A, Longitudinal section of a ...


The Papaveraceae sensu lato constitutes an early diverging eudicot taxon encompassing about 45 genera. Large morphological diversity exists between species, most specifically concerning leaf dissection patterns (Gleissberg, 2004) and floral features (Kadereit et al., 1995). Species of this family recently emerged as a possible early diverging eudicot model for evolutionary developmental genetics (Floral Genome Project; http://fgp.bio.psu.edu/fgp; Becker et al., 2005). In this study, TCP transcription factor genes were characterized in seven Papaveraceae sensu lato species belonging to Fumariaceae, including Hypecoum, and Papaveraceae sensu stricto We focused our attention on class II TCP genes, whose founding members CYC and TB1 were shown to play a role in growth processes underlying aerial architectural traits (Hubbard et al., 2002; Costa et al., 2005). The chosen strategy relies on the initial extensive characterization of TCP domains closely related to CYC, AtTCP1, and TB1, then sequence elongation. Two to three TCP sequences were recovered in each of the seven study species, which represent a minimal estimate of the number of class II TCP genes in the concerned species. One sequence in P. rhoeas appeared devoid of the R domain (CIN-like sequence), which is most probably the case for the homologous H. procumbens sequence. Fifteen other sequences exhibited an R domain downstream of the TCP domain (CYC-like sequences). Phylogenetic analyses based on the TCP and R domains using the Arabidopsis genes as outgroup supported the hypothesis that these genes formed two paralogous lineages that we called PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2. Using a different gene characterization strategy, Kölsch and Gleissberg (2006) recently obtained two Papaveraceae sequences closely related to the Arabidopsis genes AtTCP2 and AtTCP24. The specific structure of the TCP domain 3′ end in these genes may explain that we did not recover such paralogs. Thus, in all, it appears that at least four class II TCP genes are present in the Papaveraceae sensu lato, three of which have both a TCP and an R domain. Among the latter, only the PAPACYL lineages belong to the ECE clade.

Duplication giving rise to PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2 most probably predates the divergence between Papaveraceae sensu stricto and Fumariaceae. Genome duplication has recently been detected in Eschscholzia californica, independent from other duplications in monocot and core eudicot lineages (Cui et al., 2006). Consistently, two CYC-like genes were recently found in E. californica (Kölsch and Gleissberg, 2006); indeed, we found that these two paralogs belong to the PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2 lineages. This duplication may concern the common ancestor of all the Papaveraceae and account for the two PAPACYL lineages. Indeed, each of our study species displayed only one copy of each paralog, except C. vesicarius, which exhibited specific duplication of PAPACYL2. This is probably due to the tetraploid structure of the latter species (C. Damerval and S. Siljac-Yakovlev, unpublished data). Within both paralogous lineages, the topology reflected the species phylogeny (Fig. 1). C. majus and P. rhoeas orthologs were closer to each other than to any others, consistent with their placement in two subfamilies of Papaveraceae sensu stricto (Kadereit et al., 1995). A large divergence of H. procumbens sequences from their Fumarioideae orthologs was observed in the phylogenetic reconstruction, consistent with characteristics of their intermediary domain. Within Fumarioideae, the L. spectabilis orthologs appeared the most divergent from the group including C. sempervirens, Dactylicapnos torulosa, and C. vesicarius sequences.

PAPACYL2 sequences were generally longer than PAPACYL1 due to the variable length of the intermediary domain. The intermediary domain appeared quite long (217 nucleotides ± 22 for PAPACYL1 and 264 nucleotides ± 33 for PAPACYL2) compared to other characterized sequences, for example, in Arabidopsis (110–250 nucleotides) or snapdragon CYC and DICH (about 170 nucleotides). Differences in length were also observed among the three paralogous lineages found in Dipsacales (Howarth and Donoghue, 2005). Such variation may have some functional consequences through the positioning of the R domain relative to the TCP domain that is involved in DNA binding and dimerization. As observed in other botanical families, the intermediary domain was also highly variable in amino acid sequence, suggesting relaxed selective constraints (Hileman and Baum, 2003; Ree et al., 2004).

Taxon-Specific Duplication Has Played a Major Role in TCP Class II Gene Evolution

The full repertoire of TCP transcription factor genes has been obtained in the completely sequenced genomes of Arabidopsis and rice. Both species have a similar number of members (Riechmann et al., 2000; Cubas, 2002; Damerval and Manuel, 2003; Xiong et al., 2005), approximately equally distributed among the two classes that were defined from specific structural features of the TCP domain (Cubas et al., 1999a). Phylogenetic analyses showed that the two classes constitute two distinct clades (Cubas et al., 1999a; Cubas, 2002; Citerne et al., 2003; Damerval and Manuel, 2003). Accurate reconstruction of the evolutionary history of class II genes is complicated by the high rate of substitution and insertion/deletion outside the TCP domain, which makes primary homology assessment all the more difficult when a large angiosperm taxon sampling is intended. Therefore, we considered only the TCP domain for phylogenetic reconstruction. Genes available from representatives of major angiosperm clades (Rosids: P. balsamifera TB1-like and L. japonicus CYC-like sequences; Asterids: snapdragon CIN, CYC, and DICH, Scrophularia californica TCP7, and Ligustrum ovalifolium TCP2; early diverging eudicots: Papaveraceae paralogs and the Ranunculaceae Aquilegia alpina CYC-like sequence; monocots: maize TB1) were included in the analysis, together with the full repertoires of rice (monocot) and Arabidopsis (Rosid). Even though the resolution was quite low, several trends appeared consistent in both nucleotide- and amino acid-based analyses (Fig. 4). First, homoplasy of the presence/absence of an R domain was confirmed (Cubas, 2002; Citerne et al., 2003; Damerval and Manuel, 2003). Wherever the tree root should be, at least four events of acquisition/loss are necessary to explain the observed phylogeny. Interestingly, in the repertoire of rice, this domain was rare, matching the consensus of 18 amino acids given by Cubas et al. (1999a) in the TB1 gene and being more or less truncated in OsTCP3 and OsTCP10.

Within the ECE clade, most genes had an R domain. The resolution was quite low, except for a TB1-like cluster that comprised OsTB1 together with ZmTB1 and, in the nucleotide-based phylogeny, two rice paralogs originated from genome segmental duplication (Xiong et al., 2005). This could indicate that TB1-like genes have been recruited for a function specific to the Poaceae lineage. If this is true, we might expect that TB1 orthologs would sustain similar function. Actually, the OsTB1 gene was shown to regulate rice branching (Takeda et al., 2003), as was observed in maize (Doebley et al., 1997) and also in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor; Kebrom et al., 2006) and in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum; M.-S. Remigereau, personal communication). The closest eudicot gene to the TB1-like clade appeared to be an Asterid gene (LoTCP2); relationships with either AtTCP12 or AtTCP18 were not evenly supported in the nucleotide- and amino acid-based analyses. AtTCP1 has been reported as the CYC closest Arabidopsis paralog (Cubas et al., 2001). Our results were not inconsistent with this assumption, even though no strong relationship occurred between CYC, DICH, and AtTCP1. Additionally, they suggested homology between AtTCP1 and representatives of the Fabaceae LEGCYC genes (LjCYC1–3), and between the snapdragon sequences and a S. californica sequence, in agreement with the phylogeny of the concerned species.

As far as eudicot genes are concerned, the topology of the ECE clade is consistent with the phylogeny recently obtained by Howarth and Donoghue (2006), focusing mainly on core eudicot CYC-like sequences. Three subclades were identified, each one including an Arabidopsis gene, AtTCP18 (CYC1 lineage), AtTCP1 (CYC2 lineage), and AtTCP12 (CYC3 lineage). CYC1 appeared as the basal-most clade and the sister group to both CYC2 and CYC3. In our analysis, CYC1, as represented by AtTCP18 and LjCYC5, was embedded in a loosely supported clade, including early diverging eudicot sequences (both PAPACYL1 and PAPACYL2 lineages and A. alpina CYC-like gene), supporting the hypothesis that CYC1 genes are the closest to the ancestor of the eudicot CYC-like genes. It has been hypothesized that successive duplications gave rise to CYC1 and the ancestor of CYC2 and CYC3, then to CYC2 and CYC3 (Howarth and Donoghue, 2006). Indeed, the CYC2 and CYC3 lineages appeared specific to core eudicot taxa. MADS-box gene lineages controlling the identity of floral organs have been demonstrated to undergo duplication events within the early diverging eudicots (Kramer and Hall, 2005). Large-scale studies of paralogous genes suggest genome-wide duplication at the base of the core eudicots (Cui et al., 2006) that might be responsible for the emergence of these duplicated lineages, and particularly CYC2 and CYC3, opening the way for novel functional recruitment. Whereas increasing expression data seem to indicate that the CYC2 genes in core eudicot taxa are expressed in the dorsal domain of the flowers, scarce expression data are still available for CYC3 genes (Feng et al., 2006; Citerne et al., 2006; Howarth and Donoghue, 2006), including AtTCP12. Anyway, the topology of the ECE clade suggests one ancestral gene common to monocots and eudicots, with a complex history of duplication in the various taxa.

In contrast, the number of putative ancestral genes accounting for the topology of the second main clade is not readily established. A CIN-like group, including genes without an R domain, namely, AmCIN, P. rhoeas CIN-like sequence, and one rice and three Arabidopsis genes, was supported by both amino acid- and nucleotide-based analyses, even though not very strongly. CIN has been shown to play a role in leaf curvature and epidermal cell differentiation and growth in petal lobe in snapdragon (Nath et al., 2003; Crawford et al., 2004). A possible orthologous relationship of a P. rhoeas sequence with CIN raises the interesting possibility that it plays a similar role in poppy leaf and petal development. Only one well-supported group (AtTCP13-like) included one rice gene and three Arabidopsis genes, suggesting a common ancestor. Thus, at least three TCP class II genes would have been present in the common ancestor of monocots and eudicots.

Ancestral Expression of CYC-Like Genes

Both class I and class II TCP proteins are involved in growth processes. Class I proteins studied to date appear as positive regulators (Kosugi and Ohashi, 1997; Tremousaygue et al., 2003; Li et al., 2005), whereas the function of class II genes appeared to vary according to the trait concerned. Indeed, CYC and DICH were shown to repress growth of dorsal organs at an early stage of floral development in snapdragon (Luo et al., 1999), whereas CYC promotes growth of dorsal petals at late developmental stages (Luo et al., 1995). In a similar way, overexpression of CYC in transgenic Arabidopsis plants results in contrasted effects in leaf and petals: whereas leaf growth is reduced, petals are enlarged as a consequence of cell enlargement (Costa et al., 2005). In maize, expression of TB1 was observed in inflorescences and axillary meristems, the latter being associated with reduced branching (Hubbard et al., 2002). In potato (Solanum tuberosum), the expression of a class II gene appeared correlated with the inactive state of lateral and apical meristems (Faivre-Rampant et al., 2004). CIN genes in snapdragon play a role in cell growth arrest during leaf development (Nath et al., 2003), but also promote growth of petal lobes (Crawford et al., 2004). These contrasted effects on growth patterns might take place through differential action of the transcription factor (e.g. activation of some target genes, such as the RAD gene, and repression of other target genes) or through a single molecular function, the different developmental consequences being in this case dependent on the function of different downstream target genes. Phylogenetic analysis of class II genes and gene products suggested primary structure divergence possibly associated with functional divergence. Analysis of this phylogenetic pattern may help to shed light on the ancestral function of class II genes and their taxon-specific functional recruitment.

Gene expression analysis in Papaveraceae species may help to get insight into this question. In C. majus and C. sempervirens, similar qualitative expression of both PAPACYL paralogs was observed in all tissues. Except in the anther tapetum, this was also the case in L. spectabilis, even though PAPACYL1 appeared highly expressed compared to PAPACYL2. Overlapping expression in spite of sequence divergence may suggest a conserved ancestral function and/or a cooperative action of the two gene products. Indeed, in rice, homo- and heterodimerization have been described, preferentially between members of the same class of TCP genes (Kosugi and Ohashi, 2002). Moreover, a pattern of expression common to both paralogs was observed in all three species, at organ junctions, between bracts and pedicels, or peduncules and pedicels, and on the receptacle, at the base of floral organs. It is worth noting that expression of TB1 was observed at the base of the pedicellate spikelet in the female inflorescence of teosinte (Hubbard et al., 2002) and at the junction between sheath and lamina in rice (Takeda et al., 2003). In a similar way in L. japonicus, LjCYC5, a CYC-like gene close to AtTCP18, was reported to be expressed at the base of the secondary inflorescence (Feng et al., 2006). Moreover, the earliest expression of LjCYC2, a LEGCYC1 gene closely related to AtTCP1, was observed at the boundary between the primary and secondary inflorescence meristems (Feng et al., 2006). We propose that this pattern of expression at organ boundaries could be associated with an ancestral function of CYC-like genes, possibly corresponding to repression of cell growth and division that would contribute to differentiated growth of lateral organs and/or relative positioning of organs.

PAPACYL Expression in Relation to Floral Development

In Papaveraceae sensu stricto, flowers are actinomorphic, with the two petals in the two whorls equally developed. In Fumariaceae, typical bisymmetry arises through the development of nectar spurs by outer petals (genus Dicentra sensu lato). Zygomorphy occurs in monospur flowers (e.g. Capnoides, Corydalis, and tribe Fumarieae) and is initially transverse. A rotation of the pedicel brings the spurred petal upward in adult flowers. Development of the unique spur begins at the time of ovule development from a bisymmetric floral bud (Ronse De Craene and Smets, 1992). The phylogeny of Fumariaceae based on molecular and morphological data supports the hypothesis of bisymmetry being the ancestral state (Liden et al., 1997).

Three species representative of the main floral symmetries (actinomorphy, bisymmetry, and zygomorphy) were studied for PAPACYL gene expression in developing floral buds. PAPACYL mRNAs were detected specifically in the developing anther (connective and tapetum) of L. spectabilis. CYC and TB1 gene expression have been reported in stamens, associated with organ abortion or reduction (Luo et al., 1999; Hubbard et al., 2002). Expression of two other class II TCP genes, AtTCP2 and AtTCP3, was also reported in the stamens and developing anthers in Arabidopsis (Cubas et al., 1999). As in L. spectabilis, developmental consequences remain unknown, but are most probably not associated with reduced growth or abortion. As regards to perianth organs, PAPACYL was more or less expressed in sepals of all three analyzed species. In contrast, expression in petals, preferentially in the ridge region of the outer ones, was observed in the two Fumarioideae species only, namely, the two nonactinomorphic species. It may be anticipated that PAPACYL expression in sepals and petals has developmental consequences distinct from expression at organ boundaries. The specific expression in outer petals compared to inner ones might contribute to build early bisymmetric buds, a synapomorphy of the two Fumarioideae species. Moreover, the differential expression observed between the two outer petals in C. sempervirens is reminiscent of the zygomorphy of the adult flower. Further studies will be necessary to examine the generality of the expression patterns observed in this analysis and the possible role of PAPACYL genes in the evolution of floral development in Papaveraceae.


Study Species and Material Collection

Seven species of Papaveraceae sensu lato were investigated (Fig. 1). They were either from natural populations, horticultural, or botanical garden sources (Table II). In the first case, plants were collected in the wild (Ballainvilliers, France); in the second and third cases, plants were grown in a greenhouse or outdoors (Gif-sur-Yvette, France). Organs were harvested and either processed immediately for genomic DNA extraction (mature leaves), frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction, or fixed in formaldehyde-acetic acid-ethanol fixative for in situ hybridization.

Table II.
Species of Papaveraceae sensu lato, floral symmetry, and origin of accessions used for molecular analyses

Genomic DNA Extraction and TCP Domain Characterization

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves ground to powder in liquid nitrogen, according to Doyle and Doyle (1987). Degenerate primers were designed in the TCP domain, based on alignment of CYC-like genes from databases. These primers were used in three combinations to perform nested PCRs, as described in Figure 2. According to species and 2C DNA amount (C. Damerval, unpublished data), 2 to 20 ng of genomic DNA were used in the first PCR; dilution of this first PCR (1/50–1/1,000 according to combination and species) was used as a matrix for the nested PCRs. PCRs were performed in 10-μL mix containing EurobioTaq buffer 1×, 2 or 3 mm MgCl2 (for first or nested PCR, respectively), 200 μm dNTP, 1 μm each degenerate primer, 0.5 units EurobioTaq. Conditions consisted of 95°C for 3 min (initial denaturation), followed by 30 cycles of denaturation 95°C for 30 s, annealing 45°C or 48°C (for first or nested PCR, respectively, in combination I), 43°C or 49°C (for first or nested PCR, respectively in combination II), 42°C or 49°C (for first or nested PCR, respectively, in combination III) for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Bands of the expected size (110 to 130 bp according to the combination) were excised from agarose gel and purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen). The fragment was ligated into the pGEM-T Easy plasmid (Promega) and transformed into competent subcloning efficiency DH5α Escherichia coli cells (Gibco-BRL) following the manufacturer's instructions. From 17 to 100 clones were sequenced according to the species and combination. For combination I, sequencing reactions were performed with the Thermosequenase fluorescent-labeled primer cycle-sequencing kit with 7-deaza-dGTP (Amersham-Pharmacia) using a fluorescent primer labeled with CY5. Reaction products were analyzed using an automatic sequencer (Alf Express; Pharmacia). For other combinations, sequences were done by Genome Express.

Sequence Elongation

Two different strategies were used from genomic DNA. First, a seminested strategy, with the forward primer used in combinations II and III and a reverse degenerate primer designed in the R domain in the first PCR, and a specific forward primer and the same reverse primer in the nested PCR (Fig. 2, combination IV). The specific primers were designed on the basis of homology between previously recovered TCP sequence types. PCR conditions were the same as above, except for annealing temperature (47°C, 50°C, 52°C, or 55°C according to the specific primer used) and extension duration (2 min). Fragments from 200 to 600 bp were purified and either directly sequenced or cloned and sequenced as above. Second, inverse PCR was performed in Chelidonium majus, Papaver rhoeas, and Hypecoum procumbens for genes not obtained using the first strategy. Genomic DNA (500 ng) was digested by RsaI or EcoRV (without a cutting site within the known TCP sequence) in a final volume of 200 μL. Digestion was purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit, then digested DNA was ligated using T4 DNA ligase (3 units, final volume 400 μL). Ligations were purified as above and the purified product used as a matrix for PCR with primers defined in the known TCP sequence. Here, again, nested PCRs were performed to increase specificity. Fragments obtained were either directly sequenced or cloned before sequencing, as above. Sequences obtained by both strategies were redone on new genomic DNA extracts using specific primers (Table III; sequences deposited in GenBank, accession nos. DQ659308–23).

Table III.
Primers used to amplify PAPACYL sequences

Expression Analysis

Flower development was appraised through bud sizes. Adult flowers vary in size, from about 15 mm in Capnoides sempervirens to 20 mm in length in Lamprocapnos spectabilis, whereas the diameter of opened C. majus flowers reaches about 20 mm. The initial stage was constituted by buds ≤2 mm in length, corresponding to a mix of stages 7 and 8 (differentiation of sporogenous tissue in anther locules and formation of microspore tetrads) as defined in floral development of another Papaveraceae species, Eschscholzia californica (Becker et al., 2005). The latest stage was collected close to blooming, which corresponded to different sizes according to the species: 7 to 8 mm for C. majus, 13 to 14 mm for C. sempervirens, and 20 mm for L. spectabilis. Stages were arbitrarily numbered as follows: below 2 mm (stage 0), 3 to 5 mm (stage 1), 7 to 10 mm (stage 2), and 11 to 20 mm (stage 3); stage 3 buds were collected only in L. spectabilis and C. sempervirens, where buds grow longer than in C. majus. Stage 0 corresponded to whole inflorescence in L. spectabilis and C. sempervirens, whereas the three following stages were isolated buds. In C. majus, the whole umbel was taken at stages 0 and 1, and isolated light yellow buds were harvested at stage 2.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen) and DNase-treated according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion). First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out with the RevertAid Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Fermentas) and random hexamers (Pharmacia) using 5 μg of total RNA. 2.5 × 105 copies of GeneAmplimer pAW109 RNA (Applied Biosystems) were added to each reaction as a positive control of RT. Constitutive expression of actin was then used as an internal control of RNA quantity. A percentage of the cDNA reaction mix adjusted according to actin expression was used in a 20-μL reaction mix containing Taq buffer, 250 μm dNTP, 0.5 μm each primer, and 1.25 units Taq polymerase (Qiagen). The number of PCR cycles was adjusted to be in the linear phase of amplification; the product was visualized on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide as a band of intensity comparable to the 20-ng band of the SmartLadder Mr marker (MW-1700; Eurogentec) for all samples (species and/or organ). For actin, thermocycling conditions were 3 min at 95°C, then 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 52°C for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min, and for GeneAmplimer pAW109 or genes under study, respectively, 28 or 33 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min; the final elongation step was 72°C for 10 min. Actin PCR primers were: forward, 5′-AACTGGGATGATATGGAGAA-3′; and reverse, 5′-CCTCCAATCCAGACACTGTA-3′. GeneAmplimer pAW109 PCR primers were: forward, 5′-CATGTCAAATTTCACTGCTTCATC-3′; and reverse, 5′-TGACCACCCAGCCATCCTT-3′. Primers allowing specific amplification of the two CYC-like paralogs in C. majus, L. spectabilis, and C. sempervirens are given in Table III. These primers were tested for specificity by sequencing PCR amplification products obtained from genomic DNA.

In Situ Hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed following Paquet et al. (2005). Inflorescences and small buds were fixed in formaldehyde-acetic acid solution under vacuum until no air bubbles were visible (from 15 min to 1 h, according to the tissue) and stored at 4°C. Tissues were then washed in phosphate-buffered saline before dehydration through a graded ethanol series and embedded in Paraplast Plus (Sherwood Medical), essentially as described by Jackson (1991). Microtome sections of 8 μm were applied to precoated glass slides (DAKO). Antisense probes were synthesized with digoxygenin (DIG)-UTP (Roche Diagnostics) using the Riboprobe in vitro transcription system (Promega). Immunodetection of the DIG-labeled probes was performed using anti-DIG antibodies coupled to alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics). Probes were synthesized from DNA fragments of CmCYL1 (514 nucleotides), CmCYL2 (394 nucleotides), LsCYL1 (374 nucleotides), LsCYL2 (445 nucleotides), CsCYL1 (387 nucleotides), and CsCYL2 (446 nucleotides), and from cDNAs of actin (700–750 nucleotides) for the three species C. majus, L. spectabilis, and C. sempervirens. Within each species, the PAPACYL probes were tested for cross-hybridization by dot blot and immunodetection and were found to be specific (data not shown). Specificity of expression was appraised through comparison of the actin probe signal and the PAPACYL probe signal.

Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequence alignments were managed using BioEdit Version 7.0.0 (Hall, 1999), and visually refined on the basis of the amino acid sequences. Sequence types were defined on the basis of shared differences among clones. A type was validated when it was represented by at least three different clones and a corresponding consensus sequence was created.

Sequences from databases were included in some phylogenetic analyses: 11 TCP class II sequences of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), 11 TCP class II sequences of rice (Oryza sativa subsp. japonica; Xiong et al., 2005), TB1 gene of maize (Zea mays; AF415152), four TCP sequences of Lotus japonicus (Feng et al., 2006; DQ20475–78), Scrophularia californica TCP7 and Ligustrum ovalifolium TCP2 (Reeves and Olmstead, 2003; AY168151, AY168157), one TCP CYC-like sequence of Aquilegia alpina (Howarth and Donoghue, 2006; DQ462258), Populus balsamifera TB1-like (AF309092), CYC (Y16313), DICH (AF199465), and CIN (AY205603) genes of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus).

DNA Methods

Maximum parsimony (MP), ML, and NJ analyses were carried out using PAUP* 4.0b7 (Swofford, 2003). For MP analysis, a heuristic search with 100 random addition replicates and tree bisection reconnection branch-swapping was performed with the multrees option selected. MODELTEST Version 3.6 (Posada and Crandall, 1998) was used to estimate the best evolutionary model parameters according to Akaike information criterion. ML analysis was then carried out with a heuristic search and 50 random additional replicates, tree bisection reconnection branch-swapping algorithm, and multrees option selected. The NJ reconstruction method was carried out on Kimura 2-parameter distances, proportion of invariable sites, and parameter for site heterogeneity obtained from MODELTEST following Akaike criterion. One thousand bootstrap replicates were done to calculate branch support value. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were carried out using MrBayes Version 3.1.1 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001), using a general time-reversible model with a proportion of invariable sites and a γ-distribution for site-specific rates partitioned by codons. For most analyses, four chains (three heated with temperature = 0.2) were run twice for 2,000,000 generations, with a burn-in of 5,000 samples. For phylogenetic reconstruction within class II TCP genes, three chains were run twice with 5,000,000 generations and a burn-in of 12,500. In both cases, convergence was followed with potential scale reduction factor and average sd of split frequencies. A majority rule consensus tree with posterior probabilities of nodes was built.

Protein Methods

The online version of PHYML (available at http://atgc.lirmm.fr/phyml; Guindon et al., 2005) was used to perform ML reconstruction of phylogenies based on amino acid translated sequences (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003). The evolutionary model was a Jones-Taylor-Thornton substitution model, with six substitution rate categories, γ-shape parameter, and proportion of invariable sites estimated from the data.

Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers DQ659308 to DQ659323.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

  • Supplemental Figure S1. NJ tree resulting from analysis of 85 nucleotide alignments, including 17 TCP sequence types of seven Papaveraceae sensu lato species.
  • Supplemental Figure S2. In situ hybridization analysis of PAPACYL gene expression in inflorescences and flowers of L. spectabilis (bisymmetric) and C. sempervirens (monosymmetric).

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental Data]


C.D. thanks Professor H. Le Guyader and Professor J. Deutsch for welcoming her to their team for 1 year, enabling the initial shaping of this research program; Professor M. Dron for opening his lab and fruitful discussions settling bases for collaborative projects in the field of evo-devo in plants; and also Dr. M. Liden for helpful advice on the study species. We wish to thank M.-T. Marcombe for assistance in seedling germination and plant harvest. We also acknowledge Dr. K. Alix, D. Manicacci, M. Tenaillon, and Prof. J. Deutsch and D. de Vienne for valuable comments on the manuscript.


The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Catherine Damerval (damerval/at/moulon.inra.fr).

[C]Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.

[W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

[OA]Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.



  • Almeida J, Galego L (2005) Flower symmetry and shape in Antirrhinum. Int J Dev Biol 49 527–537. [PubMed]
  • Becker A, Gleissberg S, Smyth DR (2005) Floral and vegetative morphogenesis in California poppy (Eschscholzia californica Cham.). Int J Plant Sci 166 537–555.
  • Citerne H, Möller M, Cronk QCB (2000) Diversity of cycloidea-like genes in Gesneriaceae in relation to floral symmetry. Ann Bot (Lond) 86 167–176.
  • Citerne HL, Luo D, Pennington RT, Coen E, Cronk QCB (2003) A phylogenomic investigation of CYCLOIDEA-like TCP genes in the Leguminosae. Plant Physiol 131 1042–1053. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Citerne HL, Pennington RT, Cronk QCB (2006) An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 12017–12020. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls—genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353 31–37. [PubMed]
  • Colombo L, Franken J, Koetje E, Vanwent J, Dons HJM, Angenent GC, Vantunen AJ (1995) The petunia MADS box gene Fbp11 determines ovule identity. Plant Cell 7 1859–1868. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Corley SB, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Coen E (2005) Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TCP and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 5068–5073. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Costa MMR, Fox S, Hanna AI, Baxter C, Coen E (2005) Evolution of regulatory interactions controlling floral asymmetry. Development 132 5093–5101. [PubMed]
  • Crawford BCW, Nath U, Carpenter R, Coen ES (2004) CINCINNATA controls both cell differentiation and growth in petal lobes and leaves of Antirrhinum. Plant Physiol 135 244–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Crepet WL (1996) Timing in the evolution of derived floral characters: upper Cretaceous (Turonian) taxa with tricoplate and tricoplate-derived pollen. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 90 339–359.
  • Cubas P (2002) Role of TCP genes in the evolution of morphological characters in angiosperms. InQCB Cronk, RM Bateman, JA Hawkins, eds, Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution, Special Volume Series 65. The Systematics Association, London, pp 247–266.
  • Cubas P (2004) Floral zygomorphy, the recurring evolution of a successful trait. Bioessays 26 1175–1184. [PubMed]
  • Cubas P, Coen E, Zapater JMM (2001) Ancient asymmetries in the evolution of flowers. Curr Biol 11 1050–1052. [PubMed]
  • Cubas P, Lauter N, Doebley J, Coen E (1999. a) The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J 18 215–222. [PubMed]
  • Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E (1999. b) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature (Lond) 401 157–161. [PubMed]
  • Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, Lindsay BG, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS, Carlson JE, Arumuganathan K, Barakat A, et al (2006) Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res 16 738–749. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Damerval C, Manuel M (2003) Independent evolution of Cycloidea-like sequences in several angiosperm taxa. C R Palevol 2 241–250.
  • Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386 485–488. [PubMed]
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19 11–15.
  • Endress PK (1999) Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. Int J Plant Sci 160 S3–S23. [PubMed]
  • Faivre-Rampant O, Bryan GJ, Roberts AG, Milbourne D, Viola R, Taylor MA (2004) Regulated expression of a novel TCP domain transcription factor indicates an involvement in the control of meristem activation processes in Solanum tuberosum. J Exp Bot 55 951–953. [PubMed]
  • Feng XZ, Zhao Z, Tian ZX, Xu SL, Luo YH, Cai ZG, Wang YM, Yang J, Wang Z, Weng L, et al (2006) Control of petal shape and floral zygomorphy in Lotus japonicus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 4970–4975. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fukuda T, Yokoyama J, Maki M (2003) Molecular evolution of cycloidea-like genes in Fabaceae. J Mol Evol 57 588–597. [PubMed]
  • Galego L, Almeida J (2002) Role of Divaricata in the control of dorsoventral asymmetry in Antirrhinum flowers. Genes Dev 16 880–891. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gleissberg S (2004) Comparative analysis of leaf shape development in Eschscholzia californica and other Papaveraceae-Eschscholzioideae. Am J Bot 91 306–312. [PubMed]
  • Gleissberg S, Kadereit JW (1999) Evolution of leaf morphogenesis: evidence from developmental and phylogenetic data in Papaveraceae. Int J Plant Sci 160 787–794.
  • Gübitz T, Caldwell A, Hudson A (2003) Rapid molecular evolution of Cycloidea-like genes in Antirrhinum and its relatives. Mol Biol Evol 20 1537–1544. [PubMed]
  • Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Syst Biol 52 696–704. [PubMed]
  • Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O (2005) PHYML Online: a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res 33 557–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41 95–98.
  • Hileman LC, Baum DA (2003) Why do paralogs persist? Molecular evolution of CYCLOIDEA and related floral symmetry genes in Antirrhineae (Veronicaceae). Mol Biol Evol 20 591–600. [PubMed]
  • Hileman LC, Kramer EM, Baum DA (2003) Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 12814–12819. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hoot SB, Magallon S, Crane PR (1999) Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular data sets: atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 86 1–32.
  • Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ (2005) Duplications in CYC-like genes from dipsacales correlate with floral form. Int J Plant Sci 166 357–370.
  • Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ (2006) Phylogenetic analysis of the “ECE” (CYC/TB1) clade reveals duplications predating the core eudicots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 9101–9106. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S (2002) Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics 162 1927–1935. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17 754–755. [PubMed]
  • Jackson D (1991) In situ hybridization in plants. InDJ Bowles, SI Gurr, M McPherson, eds, Molecular Plant Pathology: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Kadereit JW, Blattner FR, Jork KB, Schwarzbach A (1995) The phylogeny of the Papaveraceae s.l.: morphological, geographical and ecological implications. Plant Syst Evol (Suppl) 9 133–145.
  • Kebrom TH, Burson BL, Finlayson SA (2006) Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol 140 1109–1117. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kim S, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis MJ, Suh Y (2004) Phylogenetic relationships among early-diverging eudicots based on four genes: Were the eudicots ancestrally woody? Mol Phylogenet Evol 31 16–30. [PubMed]
  • Kölsch A, Gleissberg S (2006) Diversification of Cycloidea-like TCP genes in the basal eudicot families Fumariaceae and Papaveraceae s. str. Plant Biol 8 680–687. [PubMed]
  • Kosugi S, Ohashi Y (1997) PCF1 and PCF2 specifically bind to cis elements in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. Plant Cell 9 1607–1619. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kosugi S, Ohashi Y (2002) DNA binding and dimerization specificity and potential targets for the TCP protein family. Plant J 30 337–348. [PubMed]
  • Kramer EM, Hall JC (2005) Evolutionary dynamics of genes controlling floral development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8 13–18. [PubMed]
  • Li CX, Potuschak T, Colon-Carmona A, Gutierrez RA, Doerner P (2005) Arabidopsis TCP20 links regulation of growth and cell division control pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 12978–12983. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liden M, Fukuhara T, Rylander J, Oxelman B (1997) Phylogeny and classification of Fumariaceae, with emphasis on Dicentra s l, based on the plastid gene rps16 intron. Plant Syst Evol 206 411–420.
  • Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Clark J, Coen E (1999) Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99 367–376. [PubMed]
  • Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E (1995) Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature (Lond) 383 794–799. [PubMed]
  • Nath U, Crawford BCW, Carpenter R, Coen E (2003) Genetic control of surface curvature. Science 299 1404–1407. [PubMed]
  • Paquet N, Bernadet M, Morin H, Traas J, Dron M, Charon C (2005) Expression patterns of TEL genes in Poaceae suggest a conserved association with cell differentiation. J Exp Bot 56 1605–1614. [PubMed]
  • Pelaz S, Ditta GS, Baumann E, Wisman E, Yanofsky MF (2000) B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405 200–203. [PubMed]
  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 817–818. [PubMed]
  • Ree RH, Citerne HL, Lavin M, Cronk QCB (2004) Heterogeneous selection on LEGCYC paralogs in relation to flower morphology and the phylogeny of Lupinus (Leguminosae). Mol Biol Evol 21 321–331. [PubMed]
  • Reeves PA, Olmstead RG (2003) Evolution of the TCP gene family in asteridae: cladistic and network approaches to understanding regulatory gene family diversification and its impact on morphological evolution. Mol Biol Evol 20 1997–2009. [PubMed]
  • Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, Reuber L, Jiang CZ, Keddie J, Adam L, Pineda O, Ratcliffe OJ, Samaha RR, et al (2000) Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 290 2105–2110. [PubMed]
  • Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF (1992) An updated interpretation of the androecium of the Fumariaceae. Can J Bot 70 1765–1776.
  • Ronse De Craene LP, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2003) Evolution of floral structures in basal angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 164 S329–S363.
  • Sargent RD (2004) Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271 603–608. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b7. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M, Ueguchi C (2003) The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 33 513–520. [PubMed]
  • Tremousaygue D, Garnier L, Bardet C, Dabos P, Herve C, Lescure B (2003) Internal telomeric repeats and ‘TCP domain’ protein-binding sites co-operate to regulate gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana cycling cells. Plant J 33 957–966. [PubMed]
  • Weiss J, Delgado-Benarroch L, Egea-Cortines M (2005) Genetic control of floral size and proportions. Int J Dev Biol 49 513–525. [PubMed]
  • Xiong Y, Liu T, Tian C, Sun S, Li J, Chen M (2005) Transcription factors in rice: a genome-wide comparative analysis between monocots and eudicots. Plant Mol Biol 59 191–203. [PubMed]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Plant Biologists


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...