• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Ann Rheum Dis. Jan 2006; 65(1): 26–29.
Published online Jun 7, 2005. doi:  10.1136/ard.2004.034728
PMCID: PMC1797973

Low circulating soluble interleukin 2 receptor level predicts rapid response in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab

Abstract

Background

Treatment with infliximab induces a rapid therapeutic response in most patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Factors predicting good response are not well known.

Objective

To study the predictive value of baseline level of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R), a marker of lymphocyte activation, on the treatment response.

Methods

24 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis received intravenous infusions of infliximab at study entry, at two weeks, at six weeks, and at eight week intervals thereafter. Outcome was evaluated at six weeks and 22 weeks. Clinical assessment and standard laboratory tests were made and the DAS28 disease activity score was calculated. Serum sIL2R level at entry was measured by automated immunoassay analyser (Immulite®). The mean change in DAS28 score from entry to six weeks and 22 weeks was calculated and related to sIL2R level using baseline adjusted robust regression analysis.

Results

Baseline level of serum sIL2R (mean (SD), 621 (325) U/ml) did not correlate with baseline DAS28 score (r = 0.24 (95% confidence interval, −0.18 to 0.58)). At six weeks DAS28 scores improved, with a mean change of −2.53 (−3.08 to −1.98) (p<0.001). This change was predicted by low baseline sIL2R level (regression coefficient per 100 U/ml: 0.205 (0.003 to 0.407) (p = 0.047)). At 22 weeks the DAS28 scores improved, with a mean change of −2.26 (−2.75 to −1.77) (p<0.001). The change was not predicted by baseline sIL2R level.

Conclusions

Low baseline sIL2R level may predict a rapid clinical response in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab.

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, infliximab, soluble interleukin 2 receptor

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease characterised by polyarticular joint inflammation. The disease is heterogeneous with respect to clinical features, genetic background, and immunopathogenesis. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis is incompletely understood. It involves collaboration between dendritic cells, T cells, and monocytes/macrophages, which may initiate and perpetuate immune activation.1,2 Activated CD4+ T cells in the synovium stimulate monocytes and macrophages which produce proinflammatory cytokines, causing synovial inflammation. The synovium can have features of lymphocytic follicles.3 Indeed, T cells are the most abundant cells in the pannus.

Upon activation, T cells express on their surface interleukin 2 receptor (IL2R) which is shed from the cells and can be detected as a soluble form of IL2R (sIL2R) in synovial fluid and in serum. Activation of T lymphocytes can be evaluated by measuring circulating levels of sIL2R.4

A key proinflammatory cytokine in rheumatoid inflammation is tumour necrosis factor (TNF). Monocytes and macrophages are the major source of TNF.1 The blockade of TNF with infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal anti‐TNF antibody, results in a rapid clinical response in the majority of rheumatoid patients. However, only 20–40% of the patients achieve a good clinical response ([gt-or-equal, slanted]ACR50). In the rest of the patients, the effect is only modest or is not observed at all.5 The reasons for varying responses are largely unknown, but inflammatory and immunological heterogeneity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis might be one explanation.

We have recently presented data suggesting that low baseline serum sIL2R levels may predict early remission in patients with early active DMARD‐naive rheumatoid arthritis treated with a single DMARD.6 This prompted us to study whether baseline sIL2R level serves as a predictor of early treatment response to treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid patients refractory to conventional DMARDs. We reasoned that strong lymphocyte activation, as defined by high levels of sIL2R in the circulation, may, by intensifying macrophage TNF production, delay the clinical response to, or even render the patient refractory to, treatment with infliximab. Here we report that low circulating sIL2R level may predict rapid response to infliximab treatment.

Methods

This study comprises 24 patients with chronic active rheumatoid arthritis. Treatment with all conventional DMARDs had failed. Nineteen patients (79%) were on low dose prednisolone ([less-than-or-eq, slant]15 mg/day). After starting infliximab, DMARD treatment was continued with minor modifications during the study period.

All patients gave their informed consent for participation in the study. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Helsinki University Central Hospital.

The patients received infliximab infusions (3–4 mg/kg) at entry, and at two weeks, six weeks, 14 weeks, and 22 weeks. The outcome was assessed at six weeks and 22 weeks (one patient died before the 22 week check up visit). Swollen and tender joints were counted. Patient's assessment of pain, and patient's and physician's global assessments were recorded on a 10 cm visual analogue scale. The patients filled in the Finnish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)7 and the HAQ score was calculated. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum C reactive protein concentrations were measured using standard laboratory methods. The DAS28 disease activity score was calculated.8 Immediately before the first infliximab infusion, blood was collected into EDTA, and plasma was separated by centrifugation and frozen at −20°C. The sIL2R levels were measured by Immulite® automated immunoassay analyser (DPC, Los Angeles, California, USA). The sIL2R measurements were carried out blinded, without knowledge of the clinical data.

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for serum sIL2R level and baseline DAS28 score. The changes in DAS28 scores, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Probability (p) values for changes in DAS28 scores were calculated by the t test. The predictive value of baseline sIL2R level for change in DAS28 score at six and 22 weeks was calculated by robust regression analysis. This type of regression analysis, in which the weight given to outliers is reduced, is appropriate for analysis of small datasets because it makes the results less sensitive to the presence of outliers.

Results

Table 11 presents the characteristics of the patients and table 22 the DMARDs used by the patients. The mean (SD) serum sIL2R was 621 (325) U/ml, and the DAS28 score, 6.3 (1.0). The serum sIL2R level did not correlate with the baseline DAS28 score (r = 0.24 (95% CI, −0.18 to 0.58)).

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients
Table thumbnail
Table 2 Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs used by the patients at entry

There was a distinct clinical response to infliximab. At six weeks, DAS28 scores improved (mean (SD) score, 3.7 (1.7)), with a mean change of −2.53 (95% CI, −3.08 to −1.95) (p<0.001). This change was predicted by baseline sIL2R level (table 33;; fig 1A1A)) but not by baseline DAS28 score or infliximab dose. At 22 weeks, the mean DAS28 score was 4.0 (1.2)), and the mean change from baseline was −2.26 (−2.75 to −1.77) (p<0.001). This change was predicted by neither the baseline sIL2R level (table 33;; fig 1B1B)) nor the baseline DAS28 score or infliximab dose.

figure ar34728.f1
Figure 1 Baseline serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R) versus change in 28 joint disease activity score (ΔDAS28) from baseline to six weeks and baseline to 22 weeks. The filled circles represent the means (with 95% confidence ...
Table thumbnail
Table 3 Baseline adjusted robust regression for baseline serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R) predicting change in 28 joint disease activity score (DAS28) after six and 22 weeks

In four patients initially receiving a combination of DMARDs the treatment regimen was tapered as their clinical condition improved during the infliximab treatment. One patient had a temporary pause in the methotrexate treatment because of raised liver enzyme levels.

Discussion

The results show that low serum sIL2R level predicts early (six weeks) response to infliximab treatment. To the best of our knowledge such a predictor for early response has not been described before. Given that the serum sIL2R level serves as a marker to T cell activation,4 our results suggest that enhanced T cell activation is related to delayed response to the infliximab treatment. This suggestion emphasises the impact of lymphocytes on the rheumatic inflammation and is supported by at least two lines of evidence.

First, about one third of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have extensive lymphocytic infiltration in the synovium with T and B cell conglomerates, sometimes forming germinal centres. Such patients have a more active disease and higher levels of sIL2R in their sera.9,10 Consequently, the patients with high baseline sIL2R may have large numbers of activated T cells in the synovium, thus requiring several infliximab infusions before the synovial infiltrate is reduced and disease activity is lowered.

Second, we have previously investigated chemokine receptor expression on circulating lymphocytes in the same patients. The patients responding to infliximab (fulfilling the ACR20 response) had smaller numbers of T cells expressing CCR3 and CCR5 at baseline compared with non‐responders.11 The results are in agreement with the present study, indicating that high activation of lymphocytes impairs the efficacy of infliximab treatment. Taken together, these findings raise an intriguing question as to whether the patients with signs of high lymphocyte activation are particularly suitable for treatment with CTLA4Ig12 or other drugs suggested to act through inhibition of T cell activation.13

In the present study, the serum sIL2R level did not predict the later (22 week) response. This finding agrees with the previous studies of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate for 18 weeks,14 or DMARD naive patients treated with sulfasalazine or parenteral gold for 37 weeks,15 indicating that there is no correlation between initial serum sIL2R level and the response to treatment.

Our patients, being very refractory, had received DMARDs previously and also received them during the whole study period, mostly in combination with prednisolone. A decrease in the sIL2R level may occur during the treatment with methylprednisolone, either as intravenous pulse16 or as intramuscular injections,17 or during the treatment with some of the DMARDs such as methotrexate14,18,19,20,21,22,23, ciclosporine A,24 and sulfasalazine,15 but may not occur during the treatment with parenteral15,25 or oral26 gold, or with azathioprine.19,20,22 Thus it is possible that the DMARD treatment may have affected the results by decreasing the sIL2R levels measured before starting infliximab. Furthermore, the DMARDs were continued and may have had synergistic effects with infliximab on the treatment response. Finally, the present study has the common weaknesses of an open label study. To address these questions further, randomised controlled studies with sufficient numbers of patients are needed.

We have shown that in the DMARD‐naive patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis participating in the FIN‐RACo study,27 low sIL2R level at baseline predicted remission at six months in patients treated with a single DMARD, but not in patients treated with a combination strategy.6 With respect to serum sIL2R levels, the patients in the current study—having failed all conventional DMARDs, often used in combinations—were similar to the DMARD‐naive patients in the FIN‐RACo trial.28 Thus a low sIL2R level can be a feature of early rheumatoid arthritis or of established disease and be a marker of a subtype of rheumatoid arthritis, notoriously known to be heterogeneous, and indicate a more rapid and favourable response to treatment.

In conclusion, low circulating sIL2R level, denoting a low degree of lymphocyte activation, may be predictive of a rapid response to treatment with infliximab in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. However, the marker does not identify the patients in remission after 22 weeks. Further studies are needed to clarify the predictive value of sIL2R in infliximab treatment.

Acknowledgements

Supported by grants from Finnish Cultural Foundation, Paulo Foundation, and Helsinki University Central Hospital research funds.

Abbreviations

DAS28 - 28 joint disease activity score

DMARD - disease modifying antirheumatic drug

HAQ - Health Assessment Questionnaire

sIL2R - soluble interleukin 2 receptor

References

1. Choy E H, Panayi G S. Cytokine pathways and joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2001. 344907–916.916 [PubMed]
2. Monaco C, Andreakos E, Kiriakidis S, Feldmann M, Paleolog E. T‐cell‐mediated signalling in immune, inflammatory and angiogenic processes: the cascade of events leading to inflammatory diseases. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 2004. 335–42.42 [PubMed]
3. Malone D G, Wahl S M, Tsokos M, Cattell H, Decker J L, Wilder R L. Immune function in severe, active rheumatoid arthritis. A relationship between peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation to soluble antigens and synovial tissue immunohistologic characteristics. J Clin Invest 1984. 741173–1185.1185 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Rubin L A, Nelson D L. The soluble interleukin‐2 receptor: biology, function, and clinical application. Ann Intern Med 1990. 113619–627.627 [PubMed]
5. Maini R N, Breedveld F C, Kalden J R, Smolen J S, Furst D, Weisman M H. et al Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2004. 501051–1065.1065 [PubMed]
6. Kuuliala A, Leirisalo‐Repo M, Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Nissila M, Kautiainen H. et al Predictive value of serum soluble interleukin‐2 receptor levels in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003. 48(suppl)S438–S439.S439
7. Hakala M, Nieminen P, Manelius J. Joint impairment is strongly correlated with disability measured by self‐report questionnaires. Functional status assessment of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis in a population based series. J Rheumatol 1994. 2164–69.69 [PubMed]
8. Prevoo M L, 't Hof M A, Kuper H H, van Leeuwen M A, Van de Putte L B, Van Riel P L. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty‐eight‐joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995. 3844–48.48 [PubMed]
9. Klimiuk P A, Sierakowski S, Latosiewicz R, Cylwik J P, Cylwik B, Skowronski J. et al Interleukin‐6, soluble interleukin‐2 receptor and soluble interleukin‐6 receptor in the sera of patients with different histological patterns of rheumatoid synovitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2003. 2163–69.69 [PubMed]
10. Klimiuk P A, Sierakowski S, Latosiewicz R, Cylwik J P, Cylwik B, Skowronski J. et al Circulating tumour necrosis factor alpha and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptors in patients with different patterns of rheumatoid synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003. 62472–475.475 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Nissinen R, Leirisalo‐Repo M, Peltomaa R, Palosuo T, Vaarala O. Cytokine and chemokine receptor profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells during treatment with infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004. 63681–687.687 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Kremer J M, Westhovens R, Leon M, Di Giorgio E, Alten R, Steinfeld S. et al Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by selective inhibition of T‐cell activation with fusion protein CTLA4Ig. N Engl J Med 2003. 3491907–1915.1915 [PubMed]
13. Lorenz H M. T‐cell‐activation inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. BioDrugs 2003. 17263–270.270 [PubMed]
14. Polisson R P, Dooley M A, Dawson D V, Pisetsky D S. Interleukin‐2 receptor levels in the sera of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 1994. 3750–56.56 [PubMed]
15. Merkel P A, Dooley M A, Dawson D V, Pisetsky D S, Polisson R P. Interleukin‐2 receptor levels in sera of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with sulfasalazine, parenteral gold, or placebo. J Rheumatol 1996. 231856–1861.1861 [PubMed]
16. van den Brink H R, van Wijk M J, Geertzen R G, Bijlsma J W. Influence of corticosteroid pulse therapy on the serum levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor, interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1994. 21430–434.434 [PubMed]
17. Kirkham B W, Davison S C, Corkill M M, Barbatis C, Panayi G S. Serial soluble interleukin 2 receptor levels in rheumatoid arthritis: differences in response to glucocorticoid treatment and chrysotherapy. J Rheumatol 1993. 20935–939.939 [PubMed]
18. Barrera P, Haagsma C J, Boerbooms A M, Van Riel P L, Borm G F, Van de Putte L B. et al Effect of methotrexate alone or in combination with sulphasalazine on the production and circulating concentrations of cytokines and their antagonists. Longitudinal evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1995. 34747–755.755 [PubMed]
19. Barrera P, Boerbooms A M, Janssen E M, Sauerwein R W, Gallati H, Mulder J. et al Circulating soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors, interleukin‐2 receptors, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin‐6 levels in rheumatoid arthritis. Longitudinal evaluation during methotrexate and azathioprine therapy. Arthritis Rheum 1993. 361070–1079.1079 [PubMed]
20. Crilly A, McInnes I B, Capell H A, Madhok R. The effect of azathioprine on serum levels of interleukin 6 and soluble interleukin 2 receptor. Scand J Rheumatol 1994. 2387–91.91 [PubMed]
21. Crilly A, McInness I B, McDonald A G, Watson J, Capell H A, Madhok R. Interleukin 6 (IL‐6) and soluble IL‐2 receptor levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with low dose oral methotrexate. J Rheumatol 1995. 22224–226.226 [PubMed]
22. Franke S, Herrmann D, Hein G, Muller A, Stein G. Interleukin‐6, soluble interleukin‐2‐receptor and soluble interleukin‐6‐receptor in sera of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: influences of disease activity and drug therapy. Eur J Med Res 1997. 2401–406.406 [PubMed]
23. Spadaro A, Taccari E, Riccieri V, Sensi F, Sili S A, Zoppini A. Relationship of soluble interleukin‐2‐receptor and interleukin‐6 with class‐specific rheumatoid factors during low‐dose methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997. 6489–94.94 [PubMed]
24. Crilly A, Kolta S, Dougados M, Sturrock R D, Amor B, Capell H A. et al Effect of cyclosporin A on interleukin‐6 and soluble interleukin‐2 receptor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1995. 54137–139.139 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Sheldon A, Ahern M J, Smith M D, Zola H, Roberts‐Thomson P J. Response of soluble IL‐2 receptor levels during gold therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994. 12175–178.178 [PubMed]
26. Boiardi L, Macchioni P, Salvarani C, Rossi F, Casadei‐Maldini M, Mancini R. et al Serum soluble interleukin‐2 receptor levels in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with clinical and immunological parameters and with the response to auranofin treatment. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994. 12357–362.362 [PubMed]
27. Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalo‐Repo M, Nissila M, Kautiainen H, Korpela M. et al Comparison of combination therapy with single‐drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FIN‐RACo trial group. Lancet 1999. 3531568–1573.1573 [PubMed]
28. Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Korpela M, Nissila M, Kautiainen H, Ilonen J. et al Delay to institution of therapy and induction of remission using single‐drug or combination‐disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002. 46894–898.898 [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...