![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 2006 Association of warfarin dose with genes involved in its action and metabolism 1Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden 2The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA UK 3UCR—Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala Science Park, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden 4Department of Genetics and Pathology, Medical Genetics, Rudbeck Laboratory, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden Panos Deloukas, Phone: +44-1223-834244, Fax: +44-1223-494919, Email: panos/at/sanger.ac.uk. Corresponding author.Received July 6, 2006; Accepted September 1, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We report an extensive study of variability in genes encoding proteins that are believed to be involved in the action and biotransformation of warfarin. Warfarin is a commonly prescribed anticoagulant that is difficult to use because of the wide interindividual variation in dose requirements, the narrow therapeutic range and the risk of serious bleeding. We genotyped 201 patients for polymorphisms in 29 genes in the warfarin interactive pathways and tested them for association with dose requirement. In our study, polymorphisms in or flanking the genes VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, PROC, APOE, EPHX1, CALU, GGCX and ORM1-ORM2 and haplotypes of VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, PROC, F7, GGCX, PROZ, F9, NR1I2 and ORM1-ORM2 were associated with dose (P < 0.05). VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C18 and CYP2C19 were significant after experiment-wise correction for multiple testing (P < 0.000175), however, the association of CYP2C18 and CYP2C19 was fully explained by linkage disequilibrium with CYP2C9*2 and/or *3. PROC and APOE were both significantly associated with dose after correction within each gene. A multiple regression model with VKORC1, CYP2C9, PROC and the non-genetic predictors age, bodyweight, drug interactions and indication for treatment jointly accounted for 62% of variance in warfarin dose. Weaker associations observed for other genes could explain up to ~10% additional dose variance, but require testing and validation in an independent and larger data set. Translation of this knowledge into clinical guidelines for warfarin prescription will be likely to have a major impact on the safety and efficacy of warfarin. Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-006-0260-8 and is accessible for authorized users. Background Warfarin is one of the most widely used coumarin anticoagulants in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, heart valve prosthesis, recurrent stroke, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (Daly and King 2003). However, its use is made difficult by the wide interindividual variation in dose required to achieve a therapeutic effect, the narrow therapeutic range, and the risk of serious bleeding (Landefeld and Beyth 1993). Warfarin dose requirement, which varies 20-fold, is influenced by factors such as intake of vitamin K, ethnicity, illness, age, gender, concurrent medication, body mass index and genetic factors (Loebstein et al. 2001; Takahashi and Echizen 2003; Wadelius et al. 2004). Warfarin acts through interference with the recycling of vitamin K in the liver, which leads to secretion of inactive vitamin K-dependent proteins (Bell et al. 1972; Dahlbäck 2005). Figure 1
A high intake of the fat-soluble vitamin K1 can reverse the action of warfarin. Vitamin K1 is absorbed from the small intestine along with dietary fat, and subsequently cleared by the liver through an apolipoprotein E (APOE) receptor specific uptake (Berkner and Runge 2004). The uptake of vitamin K1 into the liver varies between different APOE alleles and is in the order of *E2 < *E3 < *E4 (Saupe et al. 1993; Kohlmeier et al. 1996). It has also been suggested that the antioxidant enzyme nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAD(P)H) dehydrogenase, encoded by NQO1, has the potential to reduce dietary vitamin K (Wallin and Hutson 1982; Berkner and Runge 2004). Reduced vitamin K is the essential cofactor for the activation of vitamin K-dependent proteins by gamma-glutamyl carboxylase, encoded by GGCX (Wu et al. 1997; Berkner 2000). The main vitamin K-dependent proteins are clotting factors II, VII, IX and X, proteins C, S and Z, and the growth-arrest specific protein 6, encoded by F2, F7, F9, F10, PROC, PROS1, PROZ and GAS6, respectively (Berkner and Runge 2004). A non-vitamin K-dependent clotting protein anti-thrombin III, encoded by SERPINC1, inhibits the vitamin K-dependent factors II, IX and X (Dahlbäck 2005). Furthermore, the point mutation Arg506Gln (FV Leiden) in F5 is a common cause of thromboembolism, and is therefore a known cause of warfarin treatment (Larsen et al. 1998). The molecular basis of warfarin pharmacokinetics has been extensively studied (Sanderson et al. 2005). Warfarin is administered as a racemate that consists of R- and S-enantiomers, the S-form being 3–5 times more active than the R-form (Rettie et al. 1992). Warfarin is rapidly absorbed from the stomach and the upper gastrointestinal tract (Palareti and Legnani 1996), and in the circulating blood it is highly bound to albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoproteins, encoded by ORM1 and ORM2 (Otagiri et al. 1987). Once warfarin has entered the liver, S-warfarin is metabolised by cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) (Rettie et al. 1992; Kaminsky and Zhang 1997). Patients with CYP2C9 variant alleles *2 and *3 alleles (http://www.imm.ki.se/CYPalleles/) require lower mean daily warfarin doses than extensive metabolisers homozygous for the *1 wild type allele do, and may have a greater risk of bleeding, especially during the induction of therapy (Sanderson et al. 2005). The enzymes CYP2C8, CYP2C18, CYP2C19 may also play a role in the metabolism of S-warfarin (Rettie et al. 1992; Kaminsky and Zhang 1997). R-warfarin is mainly metabolised by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 (Rettie et al. 1992; Zhang et al. 1995; Kaminsky and Zhang 1997). In addition, CYP1A1, CYP2C8, CYP2C18, CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 may be involved in the metabolism of R-warfarin (Rettie et al. 1992; Zhang et al. 1995; Kaminsky and Zhang 1997; Huang et al. 2004). Cytochrome P450 enzymes are induced by the nuclear hormone receptors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), which are encoded by NR1I2 and NR1I3 (Lehmann et al. 1998; Chen et al. 2004). Based on an inhibition assay, there is some evidence that transport of warfarin out of the liver and into the bile may be mediated by P-glycoprotein, which is encoded by ABCB1 (MDR1) (Sussman et al. 2002). P-glycoprotein can be induced by the nuclear hormone receptor PXR (Geick et al. 2001). We and others have shown that common variants in the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genes together with a limited subset of environmental determinants account for around 50–60% of the variance in warfarin dose requirement (Sconce et al. 2005; Wadelius et al. 2005; Veenstra et al. 2005; Aquilante et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2006; Takahashi et al. 2006; Vecsler et al. 2006). Here, we fine map the VKORC1 and the CYP2C gene cluster loci on chromosomes 16 and 10, respectively, and assess common variation in 27 other genes in the warfarin interactive pathways for association with dose requirements. Finally, we evaluate the potential contribution of all positively associated genes to a warfarin dose model, which includes age, bodyweight, concomitant medication and indication for treatment. Methods Subjects Two hundred and one Caucasian patients were recruited at Uppsala University Hospital in 2000; 194 patients of Swedish origin, four of other European descent and three from the Middle East (Wadelius et al. 2004). Their mean age was 66.7 years (range 28–88 years), and 1/3 of them were women. They had been treated with warfarin (Waran®, Nycomed AB, Stockholm, Sweden) for a minimum of 2 months (range 2.4 months–26 years, median 2 years), and their prothrombin time international normalised ratio (PT INR) had been stabilised. At the six following visits, five weekly warfarin doses and five corresponding PT INR were registered. Individual warfarin dose requirement ranged from 4.5 to 77.25 mg/week. Information about age, gender, bodyweight (missing in seven patients), treatment indication and duration, other diseases and concurrent medication was taken from the patients’ medical records, and the details have been presented previously (Wadelius et al. 2004, 2005). Patients were stratified into two groups depending on indication for treatment: patients with heart valve prosthesis (n = 49), where a higher target INR usually is recommended, and patients treated for other indications such as atrial fibrillation (n = 113), thromboembolic disease (n = 9), cardiomyopathy (n = 8) and transischemic attack (n = 5). Concurrent medications were registered, and drugs were classified as interacting if they had moderate or major interactions with warfarin according to the database MICROMEDEX® Healthcare Series (http://www.micromedex.com/) (May 2002). The patients had a total of 107 concurrent medications known to influence warfarin. They were divided into three groups: individuals with drugs that lower the effect of warfarin by inducing its metabolism (n = 4), those with medications that potentiate the effect of warfarin (n = 74) and patients without any known interactions (n = 123). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Genotyping DNA was extracted from whole blood using QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN Ltd., Crawley, UK). Within the 29 candidate genes including 5 kb up- and downstream flanking regions, we selected available single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), preferably with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 5% and spread out as evenly as possible every 2–5 kb. The first set of SNPs was selected from dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/) prior to the HapMap (http://www.hapmap.org/index.html.en), which was later used for gap filling in regions where the tested SNPs failed or were monomorphic in our population. In addition, we mined functional polymorphisms from the literature. In the process circa 900 SNPs were tested. SNP assays were designed with the SpectroDESIGNER™ software. The GGCX microsatellite marker in intron 6 was analysed as described earlier (Chen et al. 2005). SNP typing was performed with the Homogeneous Mass Extend assay (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed in 5-μL reactions using 3.5 ng DNA and 150 nM of each forward and reverse primer, 200 μM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 1 × PCR buffer, and 0.04 U Titanium® polymerase (BD BioSciences, Clontech, CA, USA). Cycling conditions were 94°C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 56°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, and then 72°C for 3 min. Primer extension, sample clean up and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry analysis were performed as described elsewhere (Whittaker et al. 2006). Primer sequences are available on request. Genotyping was carried out at a multiplex level of four SNPs per well and data quality was assessed by duplicate DNA (n = 4). SNPs with more than one discrepant call or showing self-priming in the negative control (water) were removed. Finally, we removed non-polymorphic SNPs, SNPs with call rate below 70%, and markers that departed from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001). Statistical analysis Univariate and multiple analyses of predictor’s impact on the square root of warfarin dose were calculated using linear regression models as implemented by SAS and SPLUS software. To account for partial dependence among tests of SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD), we applied both the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing based on calculating the effective number of independent tests (Meff) and a Permutation procedure (Cheverud 2001; Li 2001; Nyholt 2004). LD was visualised using the HaploView software (Gabriel et al. 2002). The QTPHASE component of UNPHASED software was used to estimate haplotype frequencies, calculate means and variances of warfarin dose associated with each haplotype, and statistically test for differences among the haplotype means (Dudbridge 2003). Pairwise LD was quantified by the standard r2 measure (Pritchard and Przeworski 2001). The proportion of explained variance (coefficient of determination) was measured by R2. Results and discussion Association of warfarin dose with individual markers We selected 29 candidate genes in the warfarin interactive pathways (Fig. 1
Association of warfarin dose with haplotypes Haplotype analysis showed 12 genes to be nominally associated with warfarin dose (Table 2), namely VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, PROC, F7, GGCX, PROZ, F9, NR1I2 and ORM1-ORM2. Compared with the univariate single-marker analysis, four additional genes, F7, PROZ, F9 and NR1I2 were associated at P < 0.05. The haplotypes that exhibited the lowest P-values in each candidate gene are listed in Table 2. VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C18 and CYP2C19 showed experiment-wise significance for haplotype analysis, as they did for single markers. Likewise, PROC was significant at a gene-wise level.
Fine mapping of the VKORC1 and CYP2C regions VKORC1 on chromosome 16 was the single gene most strongly associated with warfarin dose (Tables 1, 2). We previously described five SNPs in VKORC1 in an extended region of high LD spanning over 300 kb in the Swedish sample (Fig. 2
The CYP2C gene cluster on chromosome 10 was the second most strongly associated region after VKORC1 (Tables 1, 2). This region of high LD includes CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2C18 and CYP2C19 (Supplementary Fig. S1). Several CYP2C SNPs were associated with warfarin dose, even after correction for multiple testing. The functional polymorphism in CYP2C9*3 (rs1057910, I359L), which severely impairs the capacity to hydroxylate S-warfarin (Haining et al. 1996), was the most strongly associated SNP in this region (Table 1). The functional CYP2C9*2 polymorphism (rs1799853, R144C) confers only a moderate reduction in the metabolism of S-warfarin (Rettie et al. 1994), and was not significant in univariate analysis. In fine mapping of the CYP2C region, we successfully genotyped 53 additional SNPs: 17 in CYP2C9, ten in CYP2C19, 14 in CYP2C18 and 12 in CYP2C8. In univariate analysis, significant association was observed for nine SNPs apart from *3 including the CYP2C19 5′ upstream rs3814637, the *15 allele and the intronic CYP2C18 rs7896133 (Table 1). The CYP2C19*2A allele, which leads to an inactive CYP2C19 enzyme, was in agreement with earlier studies not associated (Takahashi et al. 1998; Scordo et al. 2002). To test whether any of the other CYP2C SNPs accounted for additional dose variance, apart from the 2.4 and 10.9% explained by CYP2C9*2 and *3, two multiple regression models were used (Table 3). Both models contained VKORC1 (rs2359612) and significant non-genetic predictors of warfarin dose, whereas one contained CYP2C9*2 but not *3 and vice versa. Each one of the 55 CYP2C SNPs was evaluated against the two multiple regression models. This showed that except for the CYP2C9 SNP rs4917639, all significant results were fully explained by LD with either CYP2C9*2or*3. In contrast, CYP2C9 SNP rs4917639 gave a significant P-value in both the *2 model (P < 1.33 × 10−9) and the *3 model (P < 3.56 × 10−3). The minor allele of rs4917639 was in perfect LD (r2 = 1) with a composite minor allele formed by aggregating CYP2C9*2 and *3 into a single allele, although *2 and *3 are rarely carried on the same haplotype (McGinnis et al. 2006). These data suggest that the rs4917639 mutation occurred first, and that rs1799853 and rs1057910, which are diagnostic for *2 and *3, arose independently on the same parent allele. The strong association between rs4917639 and *2/*3 could perhaps be due to positive selection, if rs4917639 lessened the deleterious effect of impaired CYP2C9 metabolism caused by *2 and *3. This and related possibilities merit further investigation given the unusual pattern of LD between rs4917639 and *2/*3.
Other genes tentatively associated with warfarin dose Of the 13 PROC SNPs included in the analysis, four were significantly associated with dose: rs1799809 A > G and rs2069901 T > C in the 5′ regulatory region of PROC, rs2069910 C > T in intron 2 and rs2069919 G > A in intron 3 (Table 1). The two promoter polymorphisms and the intron 3 polymorphism reached gene-wise significance and explained 7–9% of the variance in warfarin dose; P = 0.0002–0.0015. Haplotypes of PROC were also significantly associated with dose, but did not increase the statistical confidence since the lowest P-value was 0.00136 (Table 2). Unlike most other vitamin K-dependent factors, protein C acts as a natural anticoagulant by inactivating factors Va and VIIIa, but all its activities are not yet fully understood (Dahlbäck 2005). Intriguingly, it has previously been shown that protein C activity is negatively correlated with PT INR, not only in patients treated with oral anticoagulants, but also in healthy subjects and in medical patients without oral anticoagulants (Watala et al. 2003). Two other studies have found that homozygosity for the G allele of the PROC promoter polymorphism rs1799809 is associated with slightly reduced concentrations and activities of protein C (Spek et al. 1995; Aiach et al. 1999). In our study, carriers of rs1799809 G/G, had lower dose requirements than others (P = 0.00055). If rs1799809 G/G individuals have a reduced pre-treatment protein C activity (Spek et al. 1995; Aiach et al. 1999), which according to Watala et al. (2003) is associated with higher PT INR, then this might explain their low-warfarin dose requirements. However, this theory needs to be tested in a larger population. A Japanese group previously failed to find an association between warfarin dose and the rare synonymous coding PROC SNP rs5935 (Shikata et al. 2004), which was not polymorphic in our sample. We analysed the two APOE SNPs that define the widely used *E2, *E3 and *E4 allelic system. Patients who carried the common allele *E4 or the rarer *E2 required higher warfarin doses than those with *E3; P = 0.0057. This result was significant after within-gene correction for multiple testing (Table 1). We previously reported that CYP2C9 extensive metabolisers who were homozygous for APOE*E4 required higher warfarin doses than other extensive metabolisers; P = 0.0008 (Kohnke et al. 2005b). This is supported by a Dutch study that found slightly higher maintenance doses of the anticoagulant phenprocoumon in APOE*E4 homozygous individuals (Visser et al. 2005). Surprisingly, the same study found that APOE*E4 carriers required lower maintenance doses of acenocoumarol. No homozygous *E4 individuals were found among Italian patients, and the association between warfarin dose requirements and APOE genotype was not seen (Kohnke et al. 2005a). These discrepant results indicate that the association between anticoagulant dose and APOE, if any, is weak. In addition, they point out that a future warfarin dose prediction model may not be applicable to phenprocoumon and acenocoumaron. Nine other genes were nominally associated with warfarin dose, but did not pass correction for multiple testing: GGCX, F7, PROZ, F9, EPHX1, CALU, NR1I2, ORM1 and ORM2 (Tables 1, 2). It has been shown that warfarin dose tends to increase with the number of repeats of a microsatellite in intron 6 of GGCX (Shikata et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2005). A haplotype including the microsatellite was more significant than the intron 2 SNP rs12714145 reported by Chen et al. (2005), however, both failed to reach gene-wise significance (Tables 1, 2). The SNP rs5896 causing a threonine to methionine change at position 165 in the prothrombin gene (F2), which was reported to confer warfarin sensitivity (D’Ambrosio et al. 2004; Shikata et al. 2004), did not replicate in our study; P = 0.2923. F7, F10 and PROZ are positioned in close proximity, and F7 promoter polymorphisms are claimed to have an effect on warfarin sensitivity (D’Ambrosio et al. 2004; Shikata et al. 2004; Aquilante et al. 2006). A haplotype located 2 kb upstream of F7 was tentatively associated with dose, and so was a PROZ haplotype comprising SNPs 5′ upstream of the gene and in the first intron (Table 2). On the other hand, the coding F7 SNP rs6046 (R413Q, formerly R353Q) that may lead to decreased plasma levels of factor VII (Arbini et al. 1994), and the synonymous SNP rs5960 in the exon 7 of F10 did not affect warfarin dosing (Shikata et al. 2004). The rare variant in F9 (A-10V/T) that causes a disproportional reduction in factor IX activity in warfarin-treated patients (Kristensen 2002; van der Heijden et al. 2004) was not found in our study population, although a haplotype covering this region showed nominal association to dose (Table 2). A recent study has shown an association between high doses of warfarin in CYP2C9 extensive metabolisers carrying the non-synonymous EPHX1 SNP rs1051740 which results in a tyrosine to histidine substitution at residue 113 (Loebstein et al. 2005). We failed to replicate this finding, although rs4653436 located 5′ upstream was nominally associated with dose (Table 1). A coding SNP in CALU (R4Q), that is suspected to increase warfarin dose requirement in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 wild type patients (Vecsler et al. 2006), was not significantly associated with dose in our study. However, the 3′ UTR CALU SNP rs11653, the non-synonymous rs2307040 and the two intronic rs339054 and rs1006023 gave borderline significant P-values (Table 1). The nominal association between warfarin dose requirements and a haplotype of NR1I2 has to our knowledge not previously been shown (Table 2). Warfarin’s association with rs3762055 located between ORM1 and ORM2, and with a haplotype covering this region are also novel findings (Tables 1, 2). The weaker associations observed for these tentatively associated genes require testing and validation in an independent and larger data set. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the prothrombotic F5 Leiden variant (rs6025) had no effect on warfarin dose requirement in our study (P = 0.4925). Multiple modelling To explore the potential of a warfarin dose prediction model, we combined the genes with the largest impact on warfarin dose (VKORC1, CYP2C9 and PROC) with patient characteristics (age, bodyweight, interaction with other drugs and indication for treatment) in a multiple regression model. This model explained 62% of the variance in dose. We then considered all nominally associated genes, VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2C18, PROC, APOE, EPHX1, CALU, GGCX and ORM1-2 in a model, which explained 76% of the interindividual variance in warfarin dose. Variables with individual P-values above 0.2 and a low-explanatory value (R2) were subsequently removed from the model in a stepwise manner. We finally reached a model containing VKORC1, CYP2C9*2 and *3, PROC, EPHX1, GGCX, ORM1-2, age, bodyweight and drug interactions which explained 73% of the variance in warfarin dose (Table 4). However, this speculative model requires validation in a large independent sample of warfarin patients.
Conclusion VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2C18, PROC and APOE were all significantly associated with warfarin dose after correction for multiple testing. Three linked VKORC1 SNPs and the CYP2C9 allele *3 were the strongest genetic factors determining warfarin dose requirements. We fine mapped the VKORC1 and CYP2C regions in search of polymorphisms that might explain additional dose variance in our Swedish study population. However, none of the VKORC1 SNPs or haplotypes accounted for more dose variance than the three linked SNPs. Likewise, no CYP2C polymorphism contributed more to dose variance than CYP2C9*2 or *3. Apart from VKORC1 and CYP2C9, the most significant finding was the association of SNPs in PROC that reached gene-wise significance. Although factors II, VII and X have the strongest influence, it has been shown that protein C, the product of the PROC gene, has an effect on one of the outcome parameters of the current study, i.e. the prothrombin time (Watala et al. 2003). If genetic variation in PROC influences the prothrombin time, which in turn determines the required warfarin dose, it is not improbable that genetic variation in PROC plays a role for warfarin dose. Furthermore, as previously reported, CYP2C9 extensive metabolisers who were homozygous for APOE*E4 required higher warfarin doses than others (Kohnke et al. 2005b). Replication in a larger patient cohort will ascertain whether PROC and APOE are true determinants of warfarin dosing. With this systematic warfarin study, we can explain 62% of the variance in warfarin dose in Swedish patients by using a multiple regression model of VKORC1, CYP2C9*2/*3, PROC and non-genetic factors. The addition of EPHX1, GGCX and ORM1-2, to the model predicts an extra ~10% of the variance. However, this model requires further validation in independent and larger samples, and will be tested in the WARG (http://www.druggene.org/) cohort of 1,500 Swedish warfarin treated patients. Even so, this future model will only be applicable for patients of European ancestry, and similar studies need to be performed in other ethnic groups. When all common alleles contributing to warfarin response have been identified in the major ethnic groups, a comprehensive dose model that is applicable regardless of ethnicity can be developed. Dosing models may subsequently be translated into clinical guidelines for warfarin prescription, and could have a major impact on the safety and efficacy of warfarin. Supplementary material(597K, doc) Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge Håkan Melhus and Qun-Ying Yue for initiating sample collection, Kristina Sörlin for extracting data from the medical records, Professor Munir Pirmohamed for helping to choose the candidate genes, David Vetrie for introduction to databases, Liz Sheridan for gene annotation, Ola Wallerman for technical assistance, and last but not least staff and participants of the study for their valuable contribution. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and the Swedish funding agencies: the Society of Medicine, Foundation for Strategic Research, Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Clinical Research Support (ALF) at Uppsala University. The sponsors had no role in the writing of this paper. Abbreviations
Footnotes Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-006-0260-8 and is accessible for authorized users. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmacogenetics. 2003 May; 13(5):247-52.
[Pharmacogenetics. 2003]Am J Med. 1993 Sep; 95(3):315-28.
[Am J Med. 1993]Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Aug; 70(2):159-64.
[Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001]Pharmacogenomics J. 2003; 3(4):202-14.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2003]Pharmacogenomics J. 2004; 4(1):40-8.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2004]J Intern Med. 2005 Mar; 257(3):209-23.
[J Intern Med. 2005]Nature. 2004 Feb 5; 427(6974):541-4.
[Nature. 2004]Nature. 2004 Feb 5; 427(6974):537-41.
[Nature. 2004]Blood. 2005 Jan 15; 105(2):645-9.
[Blood. 2005]Thromb Haemost. 2005 Oct; 94(4):773-9.
[Thromb Haemost. 2005]J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Dec; 2(12):2118-32.
[J Thromb Haemost. 2004]Am J Clin Nutr. 1993 Aug; 58(2):204-8.
[Am J Clin Nutr. 1993]J Nutr. 1996 Apr; 126(4 Suppl):1192S-6S.
[J Nutr. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1982 Feb 25; 257(4):1583-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1982]Blood. 1997 Jun 1; 89(11):4058-62.
[Blood. 1997]J Nutr. 2000 Aug; 130(8):1877-80.
[J Nutr. 2000]J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Dec; 2(12):2118-32.
[J Thromb Haemost. 2004]J Intern Med. 2005 Mar; 257(3):209-23.
[J Intern Med. 2005]Thromb Res. 1998 Nov 15; 92(4):157-62.
[Thromb Res. 1998]Genet Med. 2005 Feb; 7(2):97-104.
[Genet Med. 2005]Chem Res Toxicol. 1992 Jan-Feb; 5(1):54-9.
[Chem Res Toxicol. 1992]Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Apr; 30(4):300-13.
[Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996]J Pharm Pharmacol. 1987 Jun; 39(6):416-20.
[J Pharm Pharmacol. 1987]Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 73(1):67-74.
[Pharmacol Ther. 1997]Blood. 2005 Oct 1; 106(7):2329-33.
[Blood. 2005]Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2005]Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005 Oct; 15(10):687-91.
[Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005]Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr; 79(4):291-302.
[Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006]Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar; 79(3):197-205.
[Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006]Pharmacogenomics J. 2004; 4(1):40-8.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2004]Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2005]Blood. 2005 Nov 15; 106(10):3673-4.
[Blood. 2005]Heredity. 2001 Jul; 87(Pt 1):52-8.
[Heredity. 2001]Ann Hum Genet. 2001 Mar; 65(Pt 2):189-96.
[Ann Hum Genet. 2001]Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Apr; 74(4):765-9.
[Am J Hum Genet. 2004]Science. 2002 Jun 21; 296(5576):2225-9.
[Science. 2002]Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Sep; 25(2):115-21.
[Genet Epidemiol. 2003]Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2005]Heredity. 2001 Jul; 87(Pt 1):52-8.
[Heredity. 2001]Ann Hum Genet. 2001 Mar; 65(Pt 2):189-96.
[Ann Hum Genet. 2001]Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Apr; 74(4):765-9.
[Am J Hum Genet. 2004]Blood. 2005 Nov 15; 106(10):3673-4.
[Blood. 2005]Blood. 2005 Nov 15; 106(10):3673-4.
[Blood. 2005]Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2005]N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 2; 352(22):2285-93.
[N Engl J Med. 2005]Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Jul 1; 14(13):1745-51.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2005]Blood. 2005 Jul 1; 106(1):135-40.
[Blood. 2005]Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996 Sep 15; 333(2):447-58.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996]Pharmacogenetics. 1994 Feb; 4(1):39-42.
[Pharmacogenetics. 1994]Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998 May; 63(5):519-28.
[Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998]Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Dec; 72(6):702-10.
[Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002]Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2005]Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70.
[Pharmacogenomics J. 2005]J Intern Med. 2005 Mar; 257(3):209-23.
[J Intern Med. 2005]Thromb J. 2003 Nov 30; 1(1):7.
[Thromb J. 2003]Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999 Jun; 19(6):1573-6.
[Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999]Blood. 2004 Apr 1; 103(7):2630-5.
[Blood. 2004]Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul; 61(5-6):381-8.
[Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005]Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005 Feb; 15(2):69-74.
[Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005]Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Nov; 61(10):781-3.
[Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005]Blood. 2004 Apr 1; 103(7):2630-5.
[Blood. 2004]Blood. 2005 Nov 15; 106(10):3673-4.
[Blood. 2005]Haematologica. 2004 Dec; 89(12):1510-6.
[Haematologica. 2004]Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr; 79(4):291-302.
[Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006]Blood. 1994 Oct 1; 84(7):2214-20.
[Blood. 1994]Thromb J. 2003 Nov 30; 1(1):7.
[Thromb J. 2003]Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul; 61(5-6):381-8.
[Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005]