![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2006, American Society of Plant Biologists Somatic Cytokinesis and Pollen Maturation in Arabidopsis Depend on TPLATE, Which Has Domains Similar to Coat Proteins[W] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnologie, Ghent University, B-9052 Gent, Belgium 1Current address: Laboratoire Arago, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7628, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, B.P. 44, F-66651 Banyuls sur Mer cedex, France. 2Current address: Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. 3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail danny.geelen/at/ugent.be; fax 32-9-264-62-25. Received January 6, 2006; Revised October 5, 2006; Accepted November 10, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract TPLATE was previously identified as a potential cytokinesis protein targeted to the cell plate. Disruption of TPLATE in Arabidopsis thaliana leads to the production of shriveled pollen unable to germinate. Vesicular compartmentalization of the mature pollen is dramatically altered, and large callose deposits accumulate near the intine cell wall layer. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)–tagged TPLATE expression under the control of the pollen promoter Lat52 complements the phenotype. Downregulation of TPLATE in Arabidopsis seedlings and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 suspension cells results in crooked cell walls and cell plates that fail to insert into the mother wall. Besides accumulating at the cell plate, GFP-fused TPLATE is temporally targeted to a narrow zone at the cell cortex where the cell plate connects to the mother wall. TPLATE-GFP also localizes to subcellular structures that accumulate at the pollen tube exit site in germinating pollen. Ectopic callose depositions observed in mutant pollen also occur in RNA interference plants, suggesting that TPLATE is implicated in cell wall modification. TPLATE contains domains similar to adaptin and β-COP coat proteins. These data suggest that TPLATE functions in vesicle-trafficking events required for site-specific cell wall modifications during pollen germination and for anchoring of the cell plate to the mother wall at the correct cortical position. INTRODUCTION The cell wall of higher plant cells provides the mechanical strength required to hold the structure of the entire plant body. New walls are laid down after mitosis through the activity of a cytoskeletal configuration known as the phragmoplast. The immature wall or cell plate emerges first at the cell center from deposits that travel along microtubules to the spindle midzone. In the next step, the young disk-shaped plate expands outward until it reaches the cellular boundaries and unites with the existing mother wall (for review, see Jürgens, 2005a, 2005b). Positioning of the new cell wall after mitosis is critical for the establishment of the cellular organization of plant tissues and the overall morphology of the plant (Lloyd, 1995; Traas et al., 1995). Plants have developed regulatory mechanisms to position and guide the new cell plate. Two plant-specific microtubular arrays are involved in the positioning and guidance of the new cell plate, the preprophase band (PPB) and the phragmoplast itself. The PPB consists of a ring of microtubules and actin filaments, encircles the nucleus at prophase, and determines the future division zone (Mineyuki and Gunning, 1990; Wick, 1991; Mineyuki, 1999). The PPB is removed before chromosome segregation and cytokinesis and therefore cannot contribute directly to the cell plate guidance process. As the PPB microtubules degrade, cortical actin at the corresponding former position of the PPB disappears, leaving behind a zone devoid of actin filaments (Cleary et al., 1992; Sano et al., 2005). The role of actin in cytokinesis is not very clear. Actin depolymerization slows mitotic progression and affects phragmoplast initiation. However, it does not have a major impact on cell plate positioning (Yoneda et al., 2004). Recently, a novel marker was identified that implicates the plasma membrane as an additional structure that may be important for determining the division zone (Vanstraelen et al., 2006). The marker is a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–tagged kinesin, KCA1, which associates with the plasma membrane at the onset of mitosis. It is excluded from a region corresponding to the size and position of the PPB and the actin-depleted zone. By analogy, it was called the KCA-depleted zone or KDZ. The KDZ persists throughout mitosis until the new cell plate has expanded to reach the mother wall and therefore marks the division zone. It remains to be investigated whether KCA1 plays a direct role in the positioning and guidance of the cell plate. The phragmoplast is required to construct the new cell plate and conducts guidance of the plate to the division zone. The double array of parallel-oriented microtubules of the phragmoplast transport Golgi- or endosome-derived vesicles, containing cell plate–building blocks, to the equatorial plane of the cell, where they immediately fuse and give rise to a tubulovesicular network. Callose deposition inside the lumen of the network may provide a spreading force for the widening of the tubular network and convert it to a fenestrated sheet (Samuels et al., 1995). Fusion of the cell plate with the plasma membrane triggers a maturation process that involves the replacement of callose by cellulose. The mechanism and controlling elements required for the switch from a callose- to a cellulose-containing cell plate are still unknown. Mutants that are altered in cellulose biosynthesis often show cytokinesis defects: cyt1 (Nickle and Meinke, 1998; Lukowitz et al., 2001), prc1 (Fagard et al., 2000), kor1/rsw2 (Zuo et al., 2000; Lane et al., 2001), kob1 (Pagant et al., 2002), and fk, hyd1, and smt1/cph (Schrick et al., 2000). The cytokinesis defects described for cyt1, kob1, prc1, fk, hyd1, and smt/cph can be attributable to impeded wall formation that is manifested by disrupted cell walls in microscopic sections. The kor1-2 mutant produces, in addition to cell wall stubs, curved and misplaced cell walls, despite the fact that the PPB is correctly positioned in these cells (Zuo et al., 2000). korrigan (kor1-2) is an endo-1,4-β-glucanase, indicating that factors that are not linked directly to PPB activity are also required for the correct guidance of the cell plate. Ultimately, cell plate expansion results in a fusion with the existing wall. From a mechanistic viewpoint, the cell plate inserts in the mother wall through a multitude of finger-like fusion tubes that contact the parental plasma membrane in the zone of adhesion (Samuels et al., 1995). Because the cell plate membrane and the plasma membrane are at first independent structures, their unification must rely on a membrane fusion process that involves membrane fusion machinery different from the KNOLLE/KEULE/SNAP33 SNARE complex that is required for cell plate formation and expansion (Jürgens, 2005a). To date, there is little information on the components that contribute to the anchoring of the plate to the mother wall. A candidate protein is ROOT/SHOOT/HYPOCOTYL-DEFECTIVE (RSH), a hydroxyl Pro-rich glycoprotein (extensin) that accumulates at the site of cell plate–cell wall contact. Disruption of the RSH protein is embryo-lethal and causes misplaced cell plates, resulting in irregular cell shape and size (Hall and Cannon, 2002). Here, we report the functional analysis of TPLATE, a gene with a role in cell plate anchorage. TPLATE-GFP (previously T22-GFP) localizes to the midline of the expanding phragmoplast in dividing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells (Van Damme et al., 2004a). During the final steps of cell plate expansion, GFP-fused TPLATE accumulates at a defined zone of the plasma membrane that corresponds to the division zone. TPLATE-GFP also accumulates at the pollen tube exit site during pollen germination, in agreement with the male-sterility phenotype that is caused by a T-DNA insertion in TPLATE. How cytokinesis and pollen development are connected is inferred from the similarity of TPLATE and vesicle-associated proteins, suggesting a role in heterotypic vesicle fusion. RESULTS TPLATE Is Similar to Coat Proteins A GFP-based screen in BY-2 cells identified TPLATE (clone T22) as a putative cell plate–targeted protein (Van Damme et al., 2004a). To analyze the relevance of this gene to other species, the occurrence of homologous sequences was determined (Figure 1
A T-DNA Insertion in TPLATE Causes Complete Male Sterility TPLATE is interrupted at the third intron by a T-DNA insertion in the Arabidopsis line SALK_003086 (Figure 2A tplate Mutant Pollen Shows Normal Karyokinesis and Is Defective in a Late Developmental Stage The development of the male gametophyte was analyzed using light and fluorescence microscopy. Pollen produced by a heterozygous tplate mutant plant is shown in Figure 2 To determine the developmental stage and nuclear composition of the pollen, dehiscing anthers were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Wild-type (Figure 2J Callose Accumulates Ectopically in Mutant Pollen Grains The thick deposits at the cell periphery in mutant pollen grains may have prevented germination by changing the structure of the intine wall layer. To determine the structure and composition of the mutant pollen cell wall, sections of plastic-embedded whole-mount anthers were stained with fluorescent cell wall dyes. Propidium iodide (PI) treatment identified three types of pollen grains. Fifty percent of the pollen grains had a normal ellipsoidal morphology and fluoresced homogenously (Figure 2B To analyze the deposits in more detail, pollen morphology was determined by means of scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The scanning images revealed that the exine layer of mutant pollen is similarly structured as in wild-type pollen (notice that the mutant pollen grain is approximately half the size of the wild-type pollen grain; Figure 2L
TPLATE-GFP Accumulates at the Pollen Tube Exit Site upon Germination Because pollen development requires TPLATE, we determined the localization of TPLATE-GFP in germinating pollen. The TPLATE-GFP protein was expressed in pollen from the Lat52 promoter, which is reported to have a pollen-specific expression pattern with only low transcript levels detectable in anther walls and petals (Ursin et al., 1989; Twell et al., 1990). Transcripts driven by the Lat52 promoter are first detected in spores undergoing pollen mitosis I and then increase substantially in mature pollen. GFP-tagged TPLATE protein expressed from Lat52 complemented the pollen phenotype of the tplate mutant. The ratio of wild-type versus mutant pollen was examined in tplate plants transformed with the Lat52-TPLATE-GFP construct. The plants were heterozygous for both T-DNAs, so complementation of the mutation caused by the insertion of the T-DNA in the TPLATE gene should result in a shift from a 1:1 ratio of wild-type versus mutant pollen to a 3:1 ratio. From 1325 pollen grains counted, 971 had a wild-type appearance and 354 were shriveled. This amounts statistically to the expected 3:1 ratio of two independently segregating insertions (χ2 test for a 3:1 ratio yields 2.08, and χ2 95% interval value is 3.84). The complementation was further substantiated by wild-type Columbia (Col-0) backcrosses. The TPLATE T-DNA insertion was transmitted to the wild-type plants via pollen that invariably also carried the TPLATE-GFP gene. Moreover, using PCR, we identified plants homozygous for the TPLATE T-DNA insertion in the backcrossed offspring (data not shown). We conclude that the GFP-tagged TPLATE protein, expressed by the Lat52 promoter, is functional in pollen. In mature pollen, TPLATE-GFP, expressed from the Lat52 or the endogenous promoter, was cytoplasmic and granular (Figure 4A
Expression Analysis of TPLATE The pollen-maturation phenotype of TPLATE T-DNA insertion plants and the subcellular localization of TPLATE-GFP in pollen suggest that the corresponding gene is activated in developing pollen. We analyzed the expression of TPLATE using a genomic fragment containing the open reading frame and 800 bp upstream of the start codon fused to the β-glucuronidase gene. β-Glucuronidase activity was detected in pollen grains and at the connectivum, where the anther is connected to the filament (see Supplemental Figure 1A online). A thorough study of whole-genome gene expression during different developmental stages of Arabidopsis pollen was performed previously (Honys and Twell, 2004). The TPLATE mRNA is expressed in uninucleate microspores and in bicellular and immature tricellular pollen, but it is low-abundant in dried, mature pollen grains. The same study showed that TPLATE expression is not restricted to pollen (Honys and Twell, 2004) (see Supplemental Figure 1B online). TPLATE was originally identified through homology with a tobacco BY-2 cDNA-AFLP tag (BSTT43-4-330) with an M-phase–specific upregulation of expression (Breyne et al., 2002; Van Damme et al., 2004a). We determined TPLATE mRNA levels in Arabidopsis roots by whole-mount in situ hybridization. Transcript was present throughout the root tip meristem, although it was not distributed uniformly. The lowest level of expression was at the very tip end, and a stronger expression occurred near the elongation zone (see Supplemental Figures 1C to 1F online). The TPLATE expression pattern is in agreement with the results of previous digital in situ results (Birnbaum et al., 2003; www.arexdb.com) and does not match the expression pattern of cell cycle–controlled genes. Thus, Arabidopsis TPLATE is not likely to be cell cycle–controlled. TPLATE Is Required for Somatic Cytokinesis The presence of TPLATE transcripts in somatic tissue suggests a role for TPLATE in somatic processes besides pollen development. Arabidopsis lines homozygous for the TPLATE T-DNA insertion that also carried the complementing Lat52-TPLATE-GFP did not show discernible growth or a morphological phenotype. Because of Lat52-TPLATE-GFP expression in seedlings, as shown by GFP fluorescence and protein gel blot analysis (see Supplemental Figure 2 online), any somatic phenotype is likely to be complemented in the homozygous TPLATE mutant lines by TPLATE-GFP expression. Therefore, we decided to suppress TPLATE activity by posttranscriptional gene silencing. The TPLATE cDNA was expressed from the 35S promoter as a hairpin loop double-stranded RNA in Arabidopsis. Two independent hairpin constructs with different backbones yielded transgenic plants that displayed severe growth defects (Figures 5A and 5B
At 5 d after germination, mitotic cells were no longer detected by DAPI staining and growth was completely arrested (data not shown). A morphological analysis of PI-stained seedlings revealed the presence of interrupted cell walls and aberrant cell plates in epidermal cotyledon cells (Figure 5H Cellulose polymerization defects and weakening of the cell wall frequently go hand in hand with the stimulation of callose synthesis, which, besides its role in pollen development, normally occurs only in wounded tissue and in developing cell plates (Delmer and Amor, 1995; Nickle and Meinke, 1998; Gillmor et al., 2005). To test the presence of ectopic callose deposition in RNA interference (RNAi) Arabidopsis plants, transgenic material was stained with aniline blue and epifluorescence was imaged. Numerous depositions of ectopic callose were detected in cotyledons (Figure 5F To investigate the growth inhibition and cytokinesis defects observed in Arabidopsis in more detail, TPLATE was silenced in BY-2 tobacco suspension cells using a homologous cDNA-AFLP fragment previously isolated from these cells (tag BSTT43-4-330) (Breyne et al., 2002). The TPLATE RNAi calli grew significantly slower than calli transformed with unrelated constructs (data not shown). In >20 independent transformation events that were analyzed, ~10% of the BY-2 cells had misplaced cell walls (deviations ≥ 90°) or produced cell walls with severe deformations. Examples of aberrant cross walls are presented in Supplemental Figure 3 online. In addition, we observed that cell plates did not always fuse to the mother wall and produced fuzzy extreme ends. Figure 6
The plate is initially made and expands until it reaches the cortex (Figure 6 Root and Hypocotyl Tissues from TPLATE RNAi Plants Are Severely Disorganized Root morphology was determined for several RNAi plants (Figures 5D and 5E
Some radial patterning can be observed in the RNAi seedlings, with smaller cells in the vascular bundle surrounded by larger cells of the endodermis, cortex, and epidermis. However, the vascular cylinder in the RNAi plants is severely disorganized, and cortical layers cannot be distinguished clearly (Figure 7B TPLATE Connects the Cell Plate with the Mother Wall To investigate the subcellular localization of TPLATE in a tissue context, we analyzed Arabidopsis plants carrying an N- or C-terminally fused TPLATE construct with GFP behind the 35S promoter. Arabidopsis leaves were imaged with the confocal microscope within the first 24 to 36 h after germination, when numerous leaf epidermal cells and root meristematic cells divide (Figure 8
GFP fluorescence was observed mainly in the cytoplasm of nondividing cells with both constructs. During cytokinesis, N- and C-terminally fused TPLATE concentrated at the developing cell plate (Figure 8 The accumulation of TPLATE fused to GFP at the division zone, together with the observation that in RNAi lines cell plates failed to or did not correctly connect to the mother wall, suggest that TPLATE plays a role in anchoring the cell plate to the mother wall. DISCUSSION TPLATE is a plant-specific protein that is essential for the formation of viable pollen grains and for the final steps of cytokinesis in somatic cells. This conclusion is supported by the male sterility of a tplate T-DNA insertion mutant, by the observation that TPLATE-GFP temporally accumulated at a narrow zone along the plasma membrane where the cell plate makes contact with the mother wall, and by the observation that downregulation of TPLATE results in anchoring defects. Nonconventional types of cytokinesis, such as male and female gametophyte development, were apparently unaffected in the tplate mutant, suggesting that the cortical localization of TPLATE-GFP is driven by a PPB-dependent process. In agreement with this notion, the peripheral region occupied by TPLATE-GFP corresponds to the division zone formerly marked by the PPB during the early steps of mitosis. The accumulation of TPLATE when the cell plate is in close proximity to the mother wall suggests that TPLATE contributes to cell plate formation and positioning during the final steps of cytokinesis. Pollen germination and somatic cytokinesis involve substantial vesicle transport and fusion and, therefore, not surprisingly, become rate-limiting when one of the components is reduced or missing. Arabidopsis mutants with defective vesicle transport machinery usually display pleiotropic cellular phenotypes that culminate in a general growth disorder (Kang et al., 2001; Sanderfoot et al., 2001; Geelen et al., 2002). However, vesicle trafficking and fusion can also be dependent on a highly selective component that is restricted to a single process. The prime example for such selectivity is the KNOLLE syntaxin specifically involved in somatic cytokinesis (Müller et al., 2003). Here, we describe a putative membrane traffic protein that is required in two seemingly unrelated cellular processes: pollen germination and somatic cytokinesis. Both phenomena necessitate the modification of the cell wall at a specific site where new wall material joins the existing wall. The targeting of GFP-tagged TPLATE during cytokinesis and pollen germination to the division site and the pollen tube exit site, respectively, suggests that TPLATE contributes to these cell wall modifications (see Supplemental Figure 4 online). The TPLATE Protein Shows Similarity to the COPI Proteins Adaptor protein complexes are involved in the formation of clathrin-coated vesicles, occurring in endocytic and recycling pathways between the plasma membrane and the lysosomes or the trans-Golgi network (Kirchhausen et al., 1997; McMahon and Mills, 2004). The TPLATE protein shows similarity to the adaptin_N domain of COP proteins; in addition, TPLATE proteins contain a 14–amino acid motif that is highly conserved in all β-COP proteins. We designated this motif the β-COP–specific element. Cell plate formation relies on massive vesicle transport along the phragmoplast microtubules and involves homotypic fusion of these vesicles to produce a solid cell plate at the center of the cytokinetic cell (Jürgens, 2005a). Similar to TPLATE, COPI proteins accumulate at the phragmoplast midline, where the cell plate is formed (Couchy et al., 2003; Vanstraelen et al., 2006). To date, it is not yet clear how important these coat proteins are for the formation of the cell plate. TPLATE-GFP Concentrates at Sites Where Vesicle Fusion Takes Place GFP-tagged TPLATE concentrates between the separated chromatin when the phragmoplast emerges at the cell center. The GFP signal follows the laterally expanding cell plate up to the moment of contact with the mother wall (Van Damme et al., 2004a). Remarkably, TPLATE also concentrates at the cortical division zone when the cell plate approaches the mother wall (Figures 8E and 8F At the cell plate, vesicle fusion drives cell plate formation and allows the plate to expand in a centrifugal manner. The vesicle fusion process is mediated by an essential, cytokinesis-specific syntaxin (KNOLLE), a SNARE member that cooperates with other membrane proteins to form a vesicle fusion complex (Lauber et al., 1997; Müller et al., 2003; Jürgens, 2005a). Because cell plates are made de novo, at first there is no target membrane and vesicle fusion must primarily be homotypic. Plasma membrane and cell plate composition are not identical; thus, attachment of the cell plate to the mother wall probably depends on a heterotypic fusion process that may require a different set of SNARE proteins (Jürgens, 2005a; Vanstraelen et al., 2006). knolle mutants are impeded in making correct cell plates but frequently produce small cell wall stubs associated with the mother wall. These stubs may result from continued vesicle deposition at the insertion site in an attempt to make contact with a cell plate that in the end does not form. The formation of these stubs in the knolle mutant indicates that the KNOLLE complex is not essential for the connection of the cell plate with the mother wall. A cell plate was still formed in TPLATE knockdown Arabidopsis cells and BY-2 cell lines. However, these plates were not rigid as in wild-type cells, and they did not always connect properly to the mother wall. Possibly, cell plates did not attach correctly to the mother wall and therefore did not mature as in wild-type cells, leading to crooked shapes, in agreement with previous reports (Palevitz, 1980; Mineyuki and Gunning, 1990). In germinating pollen, TPLATE-GFP accumulates in a punctate manner at the site of pollen tube exit and later travels toward the tip of the growing pollen tube (Figure 4 Ectopic Callose Deposition in tplate Mutants Mature tplate mutant pollen contained extensive depositions of callose laid as irregular formations against the intine cell wall layer. Intine and exine appeared morphologically identical to those of wild-type pollen, indicating that callose deposition did not interfere with cell wall formation and likely occurred after wall formation had been completed. Based on appearance in electron micrographic recordings, differences in vesicle composition between wild-type and mutant pollen were observed. The most affected pollen contained fewer vesicles, and the diversity based on electron density was altered. Whether these differences in vesicle composition are the cause of ectopic callose formation remains to be determined. Relatively little is known about the composition and dynamics of vesicles in pollen. Most information comes from electron microscopic observations, by which it was determined that cell wall precursor–containing vesicles localize predominantly at the peripheral border near the intine layer (Van Aelst et al., 1993). The precursor vesicles accumulate in large amounts at the periphery to support the very fast mode of germination observed for Arabidopsis pollen (Heslop-Harrison, 1987; Pickert, 1988). Because TPLATE-GFP is concentrated at the cell periphery during pollen exit site establishment and at the pollen tube tip, it is possible that TPLATE is involved in vesicle targeting and fusion with the plasma membrane. The TPLATE pollen morphology strongly resembles that of adl1C mutant pollen (Kang et al., 2003a; ADL1C was renamed DRP1C by Hong et al. [2003a]). The adl1C mutation specifically affects male gametogenesis and leads to the production of shriveled pollen that fails to germinate. Remarkably, the adl1C and tplate mutations are fully penetrant, which is not so for several other male-sterile mutants (Kang et al., 2003a; this work). Similar to tplate pollen, adl1C pollen grains contain cell wall depositions close to the intine layer, the plasma membrane is heavily undulated, and vesicle composition is changed. The desiccation intolerance and shriveled appearance of both adl1C and tplate pollen is in agreement with a critical requirement of an intact intine wall for pollen germination and survival (Grini et al., 1999; Fei and Sawhney, 2001). DRP1C is a member of the dynamin-like protein family, which in animal cells function in both clathrin-mediated and non-clathrin-mediated endocytic processes (Praefcke and McMahon, 2004). Plant dynamins are subdivided into six families based on functional motifs (Hong et al., 2003a). Members of the Arabidopsis DRP1 family, which is most related to soybean (Glycine max) PHRAGMOPLASTIN, mediate membrane tubule formation and function in vesicle trafficking from Golgi to the cell plate (Gu and Verma, 1996; Hong et al., 2003b; Kang et al., 2003a, 2003b). The striking similarity between the pollen phenotypes conferred by tplate and adl1C together with the cell plate localization of both proteins during cytokinesis reinforce the idea that TPLATE functions in the regulation of vesicular traffic. Callose depositions were also observed in dividing cells in cotyledons and in roots in TPLATE RNAi seedlings, where vesicle composition is likely very different from that in pollen. Ectopic callose is often regarded as an indication of compromised cell wall integrity and occurs in response to stress situations (Gillmor et al., 2005). Defective cellulose deposition triggered by cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors, such as dichlorobenzonitrile or isoxaben (Desprez et al., 2002), or attributable to a cellulose deficiency mutation, as in cyt1 embryos (Nickle and Meinke, 1998; Lukowitz et al., 2001), leads to the accumulation of ectopic callose. Ectopic callose has also been seen to accumulate in embryos carrying a double mutation in the dynamins adl1A and adl1E (Kang et al., 2003b). The overexpression of PHRAGMOPLASTIN or a GTPase-defective form of PHRAGMOPLASTIN caused a persistence of callose in fully completed cell plates. Here, the mispositioning of cell plates during megaspore development is believed to retard or obstruct cell plate maturation (Geisler-Lee et al., 2002; Hong et al., 2003b). Cell plates that connect with the mother wall at unprepared sites seem not to flatten (Palevitz, 1980), possibly because the division zone contains some essential cell wall maturation factors (Mineyuki and Gunning, 1990). The embryonal cytokinesis defects in knolle and keule mutants do not display the accumulation of ectopic callose (Nickle and Meinke, 1998). Incomplete cell wall formation in plants without callose accumulation is phenocopied by caffeine, an inhibitor of Ca2+-controlled vesicle-trafficking processes (Hepler and Bonsignore, 1990) that resembles the cyd mutant of pea (Pisum sativum) (Liu et al., 1995). It is not the intrinsic strength of the cell wall in these cytokinesis mutants that is affected; rather, walls are missing or incomplete. The observations that cell plates can form and that callose persists in TPLATE RNAi seedlings and BY-2 cells suggest that TPLATE is more likely to be involved in cell wall modification and maturation than in the primary steps of plate formation. TPLATE Is Required for Cell Plate Positioning and Cell Differentiation Reduced expression of the TPLATE gene by RNAi resulted in the formation of distorted and sometimes incomplete cell walls. TPLATE is a singleton in Arabidopsis with low overall nucleotide similarity to genomic sequences, reducing the chance that other genes are silenced too. Knockdown plants sometimes produced a first pair of leaves. Regardless of the development of leaves, all plants died within a few weeks after germination. It is possible that the extended life span compared with other cytokinesis mutants is attributable to the low activity of the 35S promoter during embryogenesis, allowing growth beyond the embryonic heart stage (Odell et al., 1994; Völker et al., 2001). TPLATE RNAi seedlings had a radially expanded hypocotyl similar to that of the cellulose-deficient mutants kor1-2/rsw2, rsw1/cesA1, kob1, and procuste1 (Arioli et al., 1998; Nicol et al., 1998; Fagard et al., 2000; Peng et al., 2000; Lane et al., 2001; Williamson et al., 2001; Beeckman et al., 2002; Pagant et al., 2002). With the exception of kor1-2, these mutants have a thickened hypocotyl without severe impact on tissue organization or development of the vascular tissue. The kor1-2 mutant lacks distinct cell files in roots, hypocotyls, and cotyledons, shows impaired vascular tissue development, and cell divisions occur randomly (Zuo et al., 2000). Similar defects in cell file organization and random cell divisions are found in the TPLATE RNAi seedlings. At the cellular level, kor1-2 mutants show misplaced and distorted cell plates that often terminate before reaching the mother wall (Zuo et al., 2000). TPLATE RNAi seedlings also produced cells with interrupted and misplaced cell walls. The imperfect separation of dividing cells may account for miscommunication among neighboring cells whereby cell differentiation is disturbed and the tissues become improperly organized (Lukowitz et al., 1996). Perhaps such miscommunication provokes the formation of the starch-containing cells seen in the TPLATE RNAi hypocotyl sections. The occurrence of inadvertent cell divisions at the central cylinder is probably not responsible for the altered differentiation in the hypocotyl of TPLATE RNAi seedlings, as additional vascular divisions also occur in the mutant fass without a loss of correct vascular differentiation (Torrez-Ruiz and Jürgens, 1994). Extra cell divisions in the central cylinder have also been reported for the cellulose-deficient rsw2-1 mutant of Arabidopsis, which is allelic to kor1-2 (Lane et al., 2001). KOR1 encodes a membrane-anchored endoglucanase (KORRIGAN) that is assumed to function in cell wall modification and maturation. TPLATE may contribute to cell wall maturation too, as cell plates and cell walls appear less strong in RNAi BY-2 cells. Although several lines of evidence support a direct role for TPLATE in cell plate maturation, it is possible that incomplete cell walls and ectopic callose deposition are secondary effects of TPLATE silencing. Nevertheless, the subcellular distribution of TPLATE holds the promise that its primary function is to ascertain correct plasma membrane targeting (see Supplemental Figure 4 online). In the absence of TPLATE, specialized vesicles are no longer correctly formed or, more likely, they are inapt for site-directed targeting to the plasma membrane. The fact that the TPLATE mutation was pronounced in pollen and did not have a discernible effect on female gametophyte fertility may reflect a differential requirement for plasma membrane targeting between these cell types. TPLATE is clearly also essential for normal somatic development. Silencing of TPLATE has pleiotropic effects, including changes in cell division and cellular differentiation. Together, our findings have led to an unexpected link between the vesicle–plasma membrane interphase in pollen and cell plate maturation and attachment during cytokinesis. METHODS T-DNA Insertion Mutant Analysis Arabidopsis thaliana SALK_0030086 was obtained from the SALK collection (Alonso et al., 2003). Genomic DNA was extracted, and PCR to identify the insertion was done using the LP and RP primers (5′-CCCTTGGCAATTTTCCTCGAA-3′ and 5′-TGCAAAGTGACCCTTCCATCA-3′) that were recommended by the SIGNaL iSect Tool of The Arabidopsis Information Resource database (www.Arabidopsis.org) in combination with the T-DNA–specific LBa1 primer (5′-TGGTTCACGTAGTGGGCCATCG-3′). Thin Sections Whole-mount anther and seedling sections were prepared according to De Smet et al. (2004). Thin sections (5 μm) were made using a Rotation Microtome 2040 (Leica Microsystems) using glass knives (Leica Microsystems) for transverse sections and Superlap knives (Adamas Instrumenten) for longitudinal anther sections. Transverse sections of roots and hypocotyls were stained with 0.05% toluidine blue O (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M NaPO4 buffer, pH 7.0, and 1% Lugol solution (Merck) for starch staining. Pollen Analysis Pollen morphology was analyzed using light microscopy (DMLB; Leica). The pollen was stained with Alexander stain (Alexander, 1969), and mutant versus wild-type pollen grains were counted. Germination of pollen grains in vitro was performed as described by Chen and McCormick (1996). Anthers were stained with DAPI staining solution (0.1% Nonidet P-40, 10% DMSO, 50 mM PIPES, 5 mM EGTA, and 1 μL of DAPI; 1 mg/mL). PI (Sigma-Aldrich) staining of thin anther sections was done by adding 30 μM PI to the slides and washing them after 5 min of incubation. Aniline blue (0.5% in water; Sigma-Aldrich) and calcofluor white (1% in water, fluorescent brightener 28; Sigma-Aldrich) were added simultaneously to the thin anther sections, and slides were washed after 5 min of incubation. Fluorescent Protein Fusion Constructs and Transformation The construct to drive TPLATE-GFP expression under the control of the Lat52 promoter was created using the multisite Gateway system (Invitrogen) (Karimi et al., 2005). pDONRP4-P1R-Lat52, pDONR207-TPLATE, and pDONRP2R-P3-EGFP were used to clone the Lat52 promoter, the TPLATE, and the EGFP open reading frames in pH7m34GW. pLAT52-7 (Bate et al., 1996) was kindly provided by David Twell and was used for PCR of the Lat52 promoter and cloning in pDONRP4-P1R using the following primer pair: 5′-GGGGACAACTTTGTATAGAAAAGTTGGTCGACATACTCGACTCAGAAGGTAT-3′ and 5′-GGGGACTGCTTTTTTGTACAAACTTGGTGTCTTGTTTTGATTATA-3′. The genomic fragment of the TPLATE gene (5.1 kb) was amplified by PCR using Gateway adapted primers (FW, 5′-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTTTATTGTTCCTCACAGTCATGATATCGC-3′; REV, 5′-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTTGTTAACTTTGGTATATTTTCTATCTTTGCAC-3′) and cloned into an adapted version of the pK7GWFS7 plasmid to allow in-frame translational fusion between the TPLATE protein, β-glucuronidase, and EGFP. Expression of the TPLATE messenger was analyzed by β-glucuronidase expression, and the fusion protein was localized by GFP fluorescence using confocal microscopy. 35S-GFP fusion constructs and transformation of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells have been described by Van Damme et al. (2004a, 2004b). Cotransformations in BY-2 cells were obtained by consecutive transformations. Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0 plants were transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens–mediated transfection using the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Microscopy and Drug Treatments Image acquisition was as described by Van Damme et al. (2004b). PI staining and differential interference contrast images of anther sections were obtained with a 100M confocal microscope with software package LSM510 version 3.2 (Zeiss) equipped with a 63× water-corrected objective (numerical aperture = 1.2) using the settings for RFP excitation and emission (excitation = 543 nm; emission = 560 nm cutoff). Aniline blue, calcofluor, and DAPI staining were imaged using an Axiovert 135M fluorescence microscope equipped with a 63× water-corrected objective (numerical aperture = 1.2) with emission and excitation filters (excitation = 395 nm; emission = 420 nm long pass), and images were taken with an Axiocam camera and Axiovision software version 3.1 (Zeiss). Thin root sections on slides were analyzed by a light microscope (DMLB; Leica) equipped with a 40× objective, and images were taken with an Axiocam camera and Axiovision software version 3.1 (Zeiss). Arabidopsis seedlings were imaged between slide and cover glass. Aniline blue (0.5% in water) and FM4-64 (50 μM; Invitrogen) were added to whole Arabidopsis seedlings and imaged after a 5-min incubation. BY-2 cells were applied to a chambered cover glass system (Lab-Tek). Cells were immobilized in a thin layer of 200 μL of BY-2 medium containing vitamins and 0.8% low-melting-point agar (Invitrogen). FM4-64 (50 μM) and PI (30 μM) were added to 1 mL of liquid BY-2 medium with vitamins, and the drug concentration was adjusted to a final volume of 1.2 mL before addition to the samples. Stock solutions of FM4-64 (5 mM) and PI (1.5 mM) were prepared in nanopure water. Fluorescence intensity graphs were made using the profile program of the LSM software (Zeiss). Pollen expressing Lat52-TPLATE-GFP was analyzed by confocal microscopy on slides coated with germination medium. Complementation of the TPLATE Mutation Plants heterozygous for the T-DNA insertion in TPLATE (SALK_0030086) were transformed with the Lat52-TPLATE-EGFP construct. Seeds were selected on K1 medium (4.308 g/L Murashige and Skoog basal salt mixture; Duchefa), 10 g/L sucrose (Acros Organics), 100 mg/L myo-inositol (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.5 g/L MES (Duchefa), pH 5.7, with KOH, and 8 g/L plant tissue culture agar (International Diagnostics Group) with 15 μg/mL hygromycin B (Duchefa). The presence of the T-DNA was identified by PCR using the RP and LBaI primers. Pollen of T-DNA– and Lat52-TPLATE-GFP–positive plants was used to pollinate Col-0 plants, and transmission of the T-DNA insertion via the parental route was checked by PCR on the offspring plants. Electron Microscopy Analysis For scanning electron microscopy, air-dried pollen was tapped on stubs, sputter-coated with gold, and examined with a scanning microscope (JEOL) under an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. For transmission electron microscopy, tissue samples were immersed in a fixative solution of 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde and postfixed in 1% OsO4 with 1.5% K3Fe(CN)6 in 0.1 M Na-cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2. Samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, including a bulk staining with 2% uranyl acetate at the 50% ethanol step, followed by embedding in Spurr's resin. Ultrathin sections, made on an Ultracut E microtome (Leica Microsystems), were poststained in an ultrastainer (Leica) with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Samples were viewed with a 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL). For immunoelectron microscopy analysis, root tips of 4-d-old Arabidopsis seedlings (Col-0 ecotype) were excised, immersed in dextran (20%), and frozen immediately in a high-pressure freezer (EM Pact; Leica Microsystems). Freeze substitution was performed in a Leica EM AFS. Over a period of 4 d, root tips were substituted in dry acetone + 0.1% OsO4. Samples were infiltrated at 4°C stepwise in Spurr's resin and embedded in molds. The polymerization was performed at 70°C for 16 h. Ultrathin sections of gold interference color were cut using an ultramicrotome (ultracut E; Reichert-Jung) and collected on formvar copper slot grids. All steps of immunolabeling were performed in a humid chamber at room temperature. Samples were blocked in blocking solution (5% BSA and 1% fish skin gelatin in PBS) for 15 min followed by a wash step for 5 min (1% BSA in PBS). Incubation in a dilution (1% BSA in PBS) of primary antibodies (anti-callose 1:100; Biosupplies Australia) for 60 min was followed by washing four times for 5 min each (0.1% BSA in PBS). The grids were incubated with 10-nm Protein A Gold (Cell Biology, Utrecht University) and washed twice for 5 min each (0.1% BSA in PBS, PBS, and double distilled water). Sections were poststained in a LKB ultrastainer for 30 min in uranyl acetate at 40°C and for 5 min in lead stain at 20°C. Control experiments consisted of treating sections with 10-nm Protein A Gold alone. Grids were viewed with a JEOL 1010 transmission electron microscope operating system at 80 kV. RNAi Experiments The TPLATE coding sequence was cloned into the pK7GWIWG(II) or pH7GWIWG(II) vector (Karimi et al., 2002) to produce double-stranded RNA, and Arabidopsis Col-0 plants were transformed. Transformed seeds were selected on K1 medium with 25 μg/mL kanamycin A (Duchefa) or 15 μg/mL hygromycin B (Duchefa). BY-2 cells were transformed with the vector pH7GWIWG(II) containing the BSTT43-4-330 tobacco tag (Breyne et al., 2002), and calli were selected on hygromycin B (30 μg/mL; Duchefa). RT-PCR Arabidopsis seedlings were ground, and the RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). The RNA concentration was adjusted, and 1 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA amplification (Superscript RNA polymerase III; Invitrogen). PCR was performed using the following primer pairs: for TPLATE amplification, 5′-CGTGTGGATATACGGGTTGGATT-3′ and 5′-CGCCAAAGATCATCATACCC-3′ to amplify a 600-bp band; and for eIF-4A-1 (At3g13920), 5′-ACGGAGACATGGACCAGAAC-3′ and 5′-GCTGAGTTGGGAGATCGAAG-3′ to amplify a 150-bp band. Whole-Mount in Situ Hybridization Probe synthesis and whole-mount in situ hybridization were performed as described by Friml et al. (2003) on Arabidopsis Col-0 seedlings and Arabidopsis 35S-TPLATE-GFP–expressing seedlings. The sense and antisense probe mix consisted of a mixture of four separate probes (250, 400, 490, and 600 bp) directed against different positions of the TPLATE messenger. Accession Number The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative locus identifier for TPLATE is At3g01780. Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We thank Rita Van Den Driesche for scanning electron microscopy, Hugh Dickinson and Heather Owen for help with the pollen morphology phenotype, David Twell for the Lat52 promoter, Toshiyuki Nagata and Yasunori Machida for suggesting the callose staining, and Martine De Cock for layout. S.C. is indebted to the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders for a predoctoral fellowship. D.V.D. is a Postdoctoral Fellow and D.G. was a Postdoctoral Researcher of the Research Foundation-Flanders. Notes The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Danny Geelen (danny.geelen/at/ugent.be). [W]Online version contains Web-only data. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trends Cell Biol. 2005 May; 15(5):277-83.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2005]Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005; 56():281-99.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005]Curr Biol. 1995 Oct 1; 5(10):1085-7.
[Curr Biol. 1995]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991 Apr; 3(2):253-60.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991]Plant J. 2005 Nov; 44(4):595-605.
[Plant J. 2005]J Cell Biol. 1995 Sep; 130(6):1345-57.
[J Cell Biol. 1995]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(3):321-32.
[Plant J. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 27; 98(5):2262-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Plant Cell. 2000 Dec; 12(12):2409-2424.
[Plant Cell. 2000]Plant Cell. 2000 Jul; 12(7):1137-52.
[Plant Cell. 2000]J Cell Biol. 1995 Sep; 130(6):1345-57.
[J Cell Biol. 1995]Trends Cell Biol. 2005 May; 15(5):277-83.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2005]Plant Cell. 2002 May; 14(5):1161-72.
[Plant Cell. 2002]Plant J. 2004 Nov; 40(3):386-98.
[Plant J. 2004]Plant J. 2004 Nov; 40(3):386-98.
[Plant J. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Oct; 12(10):2907-20.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004 Aug; 16(4):379-91.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004]Stain Technol. 1969 May; 44(3):117-22.
[Stain Technol. 1969]Stain Technol. 1974 Jul; 49(4):199-202.
[Stain Technol. 1974]Plant Cell. 1989 Jul; 1(7):727-36.
[Plant Cell. 1989]Development. 1990 Jul; 109(3):705-13.
[Development. 1990]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(11):R85.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12; 99(23):14825-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Plant J. 2004 Nov; 40(3):386-98.
[Plant J. 2004]Science. 2003 Dec 12; 302(5652):1956-60.
[Science. 2003]Plant Cell. 1995 Jul; 7(7):987-1000.
[Plant Cell. 1995]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(3):321-32.
[Plant J. 1998]Plant Cell. 2005 Apr; 17(4):1128-40.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12; 99(23):14825-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Plant Physiol. 2001 May; 126(1):47-68.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Plant Cell. 2001 Mar; 13(3):659-66.
[Plant Cell. 2001]Plant Cell. 2002 Feb; 14(2):387-406.
[Plant Cell. 2002]Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Jun; 5(6):531-4.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2003]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Aug; 9(4):488-95.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004 Aug; 16(4):379-91.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004]Trends Cell Biol. 2005 May; 15(5):277-83.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2005]J Exp Bot. 2003 Sep; 54(390):2053-63.
[J Exp Bot. 2003]Curr Biol. 2006 Feb 7; 16(3):308-14.
[Curr Biol. 2006]Plant J. 2004 Nov; 40(3):386-98.
[Plant J. 2004]J Cell Biol. 1997 Dec 15; 139(6):1485-93.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Jun; 5(6):531-4.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2003]Trends Cell Biol. 2005 May; 15(5):277-83.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2005]Curr Biol. 2006 Feb 7; 16(3):308-14.
[Curr Biol. 2006]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001; 17():159-87.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Dec; 7(6):701-7.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Jun; 5(6):531-4.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2003]Zygote. 1993 May; 1(2):173-9.
[Zygote. 1993]Plant Cell. 2003 Apr; 15(4):899-913.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Oct; 53(3):261-5.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2003]Genetics. 1999 Feb; 151(2):849-63.
[Genetics. 1999]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Feb; 5(2):133-47.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004]Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Oct; 53(3):261-5.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2003]EMBO J. 1996 Feb 15; 15(4):695-704.
[EMBO J. 1996]Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Oct; 53(3):297-312.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2003]Plant Cell. 2003 Apr; 15(4):899-913.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Plant J. 2003 Jul; 35(1):1-15.
[Plant J. 2003]Plant Cell. 2005 Apr; 17(4):1128-40.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Plant Physiol. 2002 Feb; 128(2):482-90.
[Plant Physiol. 2002]Plant J. 1998 Aug; 15(3):321-32.
[Plant J. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 27; 98(5):2262-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Plant J. 2003 Jul; 35(1):1-15.
[Plant J. 2003]Plant Physiol. 1994 Oct; 106(2):447-58.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]J Cell Sci. 2001 Aug; 114(Pt 16):3001-12.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]Science. 1998 Jan 30; 279(5351):717-20.
[Science. 1998]EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1; 17(19):5563-76.
[EMBO J. 1998]Plant Cell. 2000 Dec; 12(12):2409-2424.
[Plant Cell. 2000]Planta. 2000 Aug; 211(3):406-14.
[Planta. 2000]Plant Physiol. 2001 May; 126(1):278-88.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Science. 2003 Aug 1; 301(5633):653-7.
[Science. 2003]Stain Technol. 1969 May; 44(3):117-22.
[Stain Technol. 1969]Development. 1996 Oct; 122(10):3243-53.
[Development. 1996]Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Mar; 10(3):103-5.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2005]Plant J. 1996 Oct; 10(4):613-23.
[Plant J. 1996]Plant J. 2004 Nov; 40(3):386-98.
[Plant J. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec; 136(4):3956-67.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Plant J. 1998 Dec; 16(6):735-43.
[Plant J. 1998]Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec; 136(4):3956-67.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Trends Plant Sci. 2002 May; 7(5):193-5.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12; 99(23):14825-30.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Plant J. 2003 Apr; 34(1):115-24.
[Plant J. 2003]