• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesView this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Ann Rheum Dis. Jul 2000; 59(7): 521–528.
PMCID: PMC1753194

Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis


OBJECTIVES—To evaluate synovial membrane hypertrophy, tenosynovitis, and erosion development of the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints by magnetic resonance imaging in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or suspected RA followed up for one year. Additionally, to compare the results with radiography, bone scintigraphy, and clinical findings.
PATIENTS AND METHODS—Fifty five patients were examined at baseline, of whom 34 were followed up for one year. Twenty one patients already fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA at baseline, five fulfilled the criteria only after one year's follow up, whereas eight maintained the original diagnosis of early unclassified polyarthritis. The following MRI variables were assessed at baseline and one year: synovial membrane hypertrophy score, number of erosions, and tenosynovitis score.
RESULTS—MRI detected progression of erosions earlier and more often than did radiography of the same joints; at baseline the MRI to radiography ratio was 28:4. Erosions were exclusively found in patients with RA at baseline or fulfilling the ACR criteria at one year. At one year follow up, scores of MR synovial membrane hypertrophy, tenosynovitis, and scintigraphic tracer accumulation had not changed significantly from baseline; in contrast, swollen and tender joint counts had declined significantly (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS—MRI detected more erosions than radiography. MR synovial membrane hypertrophy and scintigraphy scores did not parallel the changes seen over time in clinically assessed swollen and tender joint counts. Although joint disease activity may be assessed as quiescent by conventional clinical methods, a more detailed evaluation by MRI may show that a pathological condition is still present within the synovium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fleming A, Benn RT, Corbett M, Wood PH. Early rheumatoid disease. II. Patterns of joint involvement. Ann Rheum Dis. 1976 Aug;35(4):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Scott DL, Coulton BL, Popert AJ. Long term progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 May;45(5):373–378. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brook A, Corbett M. Radiographic changes in early rheumatoid disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977 Feb;36(1):71–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Emery P. Therapeutic approaches for early rheumatoid arthritis. How early? How aggressive? Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;34 (Suppl 2):87–90. [PubMed]
  • Ostergaard M, Gideon P, Sørensen K, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, Henriksen O, Lorenzen I. Scoring of synovial membrane hypertrophy and bone erosions by MR imaging in clinically active and inactive rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(4):212–218. [PubMed]
  • McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, McLean L. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Jun;57(6):350–356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Adam G, Dammer M, Bohndorf K, Christoph R, Fenke F, Günther RW. Rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Jan;156(1):125–129. [PubMed]
  • Björkengren AG, Geborek P, Rydholm U, Holtås S, Petterson H. MR imaging of the knee in acute rheumatoid arthritis: synovial uptake of gadolinium-DOTA. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Aug;155(2):329–332. [PubMed]
  • Hervé-Somma CM, Sebag GH, Prieur AM, Bonnerot V, Lallemand DP. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: MR evaluation with Gd-DOTA. Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):93–98. [PubMed]
  • Foley-Nolan D, Stack JP, Ryan M, Redmond U, Barry C, Ennis J, Coughlan RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis--a comparison with plain film radiographs. Br J Rheumatol. 1991 Apr;30(2):101–106. [PubMed]
  • Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Masuyama J, Furuse M. Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology. 1996 Jan;198(1):185–192. [PubMed]
  • Jevtic V, Watt I, Rozman B, Kos-Golja M, Demsar F, Jarh O. Distinctive radiological features of small hand joints in rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthritis demonstrated by contrast-enhanced (Gd-DTPA) magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 1995 Jul;24(5):351–355. [PubMed]
  • Polisson RP, Schoenberg OI, Fischman A, Rubin R, Simon LS, Rosenthal D, Palmer WE. Use of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in the assessment of synovial volume and glucose metabolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jun;38(6):819–825. [PubMed]
  • Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, Gideon P, Klarlund M, Jensen KE, Lorenzen I. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 May;42(5):918–929. [PubMed]
  • Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Kano S. Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of pannus volume in the hands. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Aug;37(8):854–861. [PubMed]
  • Jevtic V, Watt I, Rozman B, Presetnik M, Logar D, Praprotnik S, Tomsic M, Sipek A, Kos-Golja M, Sepe A, et al. Prognostic value of contrast enhanced Gd-DTPA MRI for development of bone erosive changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Dec;35 (Suppl 3):26–30. [PubMed]
  • McGonagle D, Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, Gibbon W, Green M, Wakefield R, Ridgway J, Emery P. The relationship between synovitis and bone changes in early untreated rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Aug;42(8):1706–1711. [PubMed]
  • Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf KJ, Raber H, Hamm B, Burmester GR, Bollow M. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jun;42(6):1232–1245. [PubMed]
  • Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Gideon P, Sørensen K, Jensen KE, Lorenzen I. Wrist and finger joint MR imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiol. 1999 Jul;40(4):400–409. [PubMed]
  • Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Lorenzen I. Finger joint synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: quantitative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999 Jan;38(1):66–72. [PubMed]
  • Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Rostrup E, Skjødt H, Lorenzen I. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis, early unclassified polyarthritis, and healthy controls. Scand J Rheumatol. 2000;29(2):108–115. [PubMed]
  • Jevtic V, Watt I, Rozman B, Kos-Golja M, Praprotnik S, Logar D, Presetnik M, Demsar F, Jarh O, Campion G, et al. Contrast enhanced Gd-DTPA magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis during a clinical trial with DMARDs. A prospective two-year follow-up study on hand joints in 31 patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1997 Mar-Apr;15(2):151–156. [PubMed]
  • Jevtic V, Rozman B, Watt I, Presetnik M. Use of contrast enhanced MRI in the assessment of therapeutic response to a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Case study of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis--6- and 24-month follow up. Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;34(10):956–959. [PubMed]
  • Fuchs HA, Pincus T. Radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis: description by nonlinear models. J Rheumatol. 1992 Nov;19(11):1655–1658. [PubMed]
  • Pincus T, Callahan LF, Fuchs HA, Larsen A, Kaye J. Quantitative analysis of hand radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis: time course of radiographic changes, relation to joint examination measures, and comparison of different scoring methods. J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;22(10):1983–1989. [PubMed]
  • Larsen A, Thoen J. Hand radiography of 200 patients with rheumatoid arthritis repeated after an interval of one year. Scand J Rheumatol. 1987;16(6):395–401. [PubMed]
  • Salaffi F, Ferraccioli GF. Progress of the anatomical damage in rheumatoid hands. Radiography of the natural course of the disease or of the course during treatment? Scand J Rheumatol. 1989;18(2):119–120. [PubMed]
  • Wolfe F, Kleinheksel SM, Cathey MA, Hawley DJ, Spitz PW, Fries JF. The clinical value of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Functional Disability Index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1988 Oct;15(10):1480–1488. [PubMed]
  • Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, Furst D, Goldsmith C, Kieszak S, Lightfoot R, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729–740. [PubMed]
  • van der Heijde DM. Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Aug;10(3):435–453. [PubMed]
  • Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1977 Jul;18(4):481–491. [PubMed]
  • Larsen A. How to apply Larsen score in evaluating radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis in long-term studies. J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;22(10):1974–1975. [PubMed]
  • Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315–324. [PubMed]
  • Kuper IH, van Leeuwen MA, van Riel PL, Sluiter WJ, Houtman NM, Cats HA, van Rijswijk MH. Influence of a ceiling effect on the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis during the first 6 years of disease. J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):268–276. [PubMed]
  • Halla JT, Fallahi S, Hardin JG. Small joint involvement: a systematic roentgenographic study in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 Apr;45(4):327–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, McLean L. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Mar;58(3):156–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kirwan JR. The relationship between synovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Feb;36(2):225–228. [PubMed]
  • Firestein GS. Starving the synovium: angiogenesis and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest. 1999 Jan;103(1):3–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Storgard CM, Stupack DG, Jonczyk A, Goodman SL, Fox RI, Cheresh DA. Decreased angiogenesis and arthritic disease in rabbits treated with an alphavbeta3 antagonist. J Clin Invest. 1999 Jan;103(1):47–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Möttönen TT, Hannonen P, Toivanen J, Rekonen A, Oka M. Value of joint scintigraphy in the prediction of erosiveness in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1988 Mar;47(3):183–189. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Van de Wiele C, Van den Bosch F, Mielants H, Simons M, Veys EM, Dierckx RA. Bone scintigraphy of the hands in early stage lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997 Oct;24(10):1916–1921. [PubMed]
  • Peterfy CG, Roberts T, Genant HK. Dedicated extremity MR imaging. An emerging technology. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997 Jan;35(1):1–20. [PubMed]

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
(A) Distribution of magnetic resonance imaging synovial membrane hypertrophy scores (0-4) in each finger joint (given as a percentage for each score (0-4)). (B) Clinical assessment in individual 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal ...
Figure 2
Distribution of magnetic resonance (MR) erosions at baseline and at the one year follow up of the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints of the dominant hand (of 32 right handed and two left handed patients). A dot ...
Figure 3
Magnetic resonance images of the three new erosions (white arrows) developed within the observation period of one year in three patients. T1 weighted, spin echo, pre-contrast axial images (A) at baseline, and (B) at the one year follow up; a new erosion ...
Figure 4
Distribution of radiographic erosions at baseline and at the one year follow up in both hands (34 patients). A dot represents an erosion at baseline. A triangle represents a new erosion at the one year follow up. Erosions found in dominant hands ...

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...