• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
Ann Rheum Dis. Jan 1998; 57(1): 13–19.
PMCID: PMC1752458

On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study


OBJECTIVES—Knowledge on the clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice is poor. Preceding studies offer a fragmentary view only, whereas further knowledge is important to enable the assessment of the prognosis. The object of this study is to investigate the course of low back pain presented in general practice to enable the assessment of the prognosis.
METHODS—A one year follow up study on the clinical course of low back pain in consecutive cases receiving usual care in general practice. During a period of two years 15 general practitioners from Amsterdam and surrounding areas included consecutive patients with both chronic and recent onset low back pain. After the initial visit, each patient was monitored for a period of 12 months. The follow up consisted of monthly postal questionnaires on the course of the low back pain and the related disability.
RESULTS—A total of 443 of 605 patients identified were included in the follow up, which was fully completed by 269 patients. In general, patients with less serious low back pain participated less often or did not complete the follow up. At 12 weeks 35% and at the end of the follow up 10% of the population, respectively, still suffered from low back pain. Both the pain and the disability seemed to diminish quickly after the initial visit, and both seemed to stabilise at a lower level if the low back pain did not disappear completely. About three of four patients, whose pain disappeared before the end of the follow up, endured one or more relapses within a year. The median time to a relapse was about seven weeks, and its median duration about six weeks. Both the pain and the disability turned out to be less severe during relapses. The median time to recovery for patients whose low back pain developed more than seven weeks before the initial visit, was four weeks longer than for patients with more recently developed low back pain at the initial visit.
CONCLUSIONS—The clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice, for the most patients, clearly is less favourable than expected. It takes more than just a few weeks to recover, and relapses occur within a year in most cases. Fortunately, both the pain and the disability quickly diminish, even if the low back pain does not resolve within a few weeks.

Keywords: backache; prognosis; follow up study; general practice

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987 Sep;12(7 Suppl):S1–59. [PubMed]
  • Schlegel JD, Champine J, Taylor MS, Watson JT, Champine M, Schleusener RL, Savory KM. The role of distraction in improving the space available in the lumbar stenotic canal and foramen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Sep 15;19(18):2041–2047. [PubMed]
  • Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L. Graded chronic pain status: an epidemiologic evaluation. Pain. 1990 Mar;40(3):279–291. [PubMed]
  • Allan DB, Waddell G. An historical perspective on low back pain and disability. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;234:1–23. [PubMed]
  • Waddell G. 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987 Sep;12(7):632–644. [PubMed]
  • Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 Mar;8(2):141–144. [PubMed]
  • Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127–1131. [PubMed]
  • Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45–56. [PubMed]
  • Deyo RA. Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986 Nov;11(9):951–954. [PubMed]
  • Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker DR. The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 5;333(14):913–917. [PubMed]
  • Chavannes AW, Gubbels J, Post D, Rutten G, Thomas S. Acute low back pain: patients' perceptions of pain four weeks after initial diagnosis and treatment in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Jun;36(287):271–273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, Le Parc JM, Paolaggi JB. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ. 1994 Feb 26;308(6928):577–580. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Psychosocial predictors of disability in patients with low back pain. J Rheumatol. 1988 Oct;15(10):1557–1564. [PubMed]
  • Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Barlow W. Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 Jun 1;18(7):855–862. [PubMed]
  • Lanier DC, Stockton P. Clinical predictors of outcome of acute episodes of low back pain. J Fam Pract. 1988 Nov;27(5):483–489. [PubMed]
  • Pedersen PA. Prognostic indicators in low back pain. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Apr;31(225):209–216. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Philips HC, Grant L. The evolution of chronic back pain problems: a longitudinal study. Behav Res Ther. 1991;29(5):435–441. [PubMed]
  • Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 Mar;8(2):145–150. [PubMed]
  • Biering-Sørensen F, Hilden J. Reproducibility of the history of low-back trouble. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984 Apr;9(3):280–286. [PubMed]
  • Abenhaim L, Suissa S, Rossignol M. Risk of recurrence of occupational back pain over three year follow up. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Dec;45(12):829–833. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Klenerman L, Slade PD, Stanley IM, Pennie B, Reilly JP, Atchison LE, Troup JD, Rose MJ. The prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in a general practice setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Feb 15;20(4):478–484. [PubMed]
  • Mody GM, Meyers OL. Resorptive arthropathy in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1988 Jul;15(7):1075–1077. [PubMed]

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
The time to recovery from low back pain presented in general practice. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve on the time to recovery after the initial visit. The nominator at each week of the follow up equals the number of cases still in pain, that is the patients ...

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles