• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
Ann Rheum Dis. Apr 1997; 56(4): 268–271.
PMCID: PMC1752352

The relation between tender points and fibromyalgia symptom variables: evidence that fibromyalgia is not a discrete disorder in the clinic

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To investigate the relation between measures of pain threshold and symptoms of distress to determine if fibromyalgia is a discrete construct/disorder in the clinic.
METHODS—627 patients seen at an outpatient rheumatology centre from 1993 to 1996 underwent tender point and dolorimetry examinations. All completed the assessment scales for fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, global severity, pain, functional disability, and a composite measure of distress constructed from scores of sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and global severity—the rheumatology distress index (RDI).
RESULTS—In regression analyses, the RDI was linearly related to the count of tender points (r2=0.30). Lesser associations were found between the RDI and dolorimetry measurements (r2=0.08). The RDI was more strongly correlated with the two measures of pain threshold than any of the individual fibromyalgia symptom variables. In partial correlation analyses, all of the information relating to symptom variables was contained in the tender point count, and dolorimetry was not independently related to symptoms.
CONCLUSION—Tender points are linearly related to fibromyalgia variables and distress, and there is no discrete enhancement or perturbation of fibromyalgia or distress variables associated with very high levels of tender points. Although fibromyalgia is a recognisable clinical entity, there seems to be no rationale for treating fibromyalgia as a discrete disorder, and it would seem appropriate to consider the entire range of tenderness and distress in clinic patients as well as in research studies. The tender point count functions as a `sedimentation rate' for distress, and is a better measure than the dolorimetry score.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (115K).

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Graph of rheumatology distress index versus tender point count scores. Lines are predicted lowess (locally weighted regression) lines and 95% confidence intervals. The r2 values from linear regressions are 0.30 and 0.08, respectively. ...
Figure 2
Graph of rheumatology distress index versus dolorimetry scores. Lines are predicted lowess (locally weighted regression) lines and 95% confidence intervals. The r2 values from linear regressions are 0.30 and 0.08, respectively.

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...