• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Tob Control. Dec 2000; 9(4): 364–371.
PMCID: PMC1748400

Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions


OBJECTIVE—To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions.
DESIGN—Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS—Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores.
RESULTS—Smokers clustered in three groups. "Reluctant" smokers (16%) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel "easygoing" smokers (42%) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. "Adamant" smokers (42%) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the "adamant" non-smokers (45%) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. "Unempowered" non-smokers (34%) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. "Laissez-faire" non-smokers (21%) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places.
CONCLUSION—Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.

Keywords: smokers; non-smokers; attitudes; smoking restrictions; typology; cluster

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fagerstrom KO, Schneider NG. Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):159–182. [PubMed]
  • Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119–1127. [PubMed]
  • Kozlowski LT, Porter CQ, Orleans CT, Pope MA, Heatherton T. Predicting smoking cessation with self-reported measures of nicotine dependence: FTQ, FTND, and HSI. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994 Feb;34(3):211–216. [PubMed]
  • Pierce JP, Farkas AJ, Gilpin EA. Beyond stages of change: the quitting continuum measures progress towards successful smoking cessation. Addiction. 1998 Feb;93(2):277–286. [PubMed]
  • Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38–48. [PubMed]
  • DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, Velicer WF, Velasquez MM, Rossi JS. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):295–304. [PubMed]
  • Husten CG, McCarty MC, Giovino GA, Chrismon JH, Zhu B. Intermittent smokers: a descriptive analysis of persons who have never smoked daily. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):86–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gilpin E, Cavin SW, Pierce JP. Adult smokers who do not smoke daily. Addiction. 1997 Apr;92(4):473–480. [PubMed]
  • Ashley MJ, Bull SB, Pederson LL. Support among smokers and nonsmokers for restrictions on smoking. Am J Prev Med. 1995 Sep-Oct;11(5):283–287. [PubMed]
  • Martin G, Steyn K, Yach D. Beliefs about smoking and health and attitudes toward tobacco control measures. S Afr Med J. 1992 Oct;82(4):241–245. [PubMed]
  • Pederson LL, Bull SB, Ashley MJ, Lefcoe NM. A population survey in Ontario regarding restrictive measures on smoking: relationship of smoking status to knowledge, attitudes and predicted behaviour. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep;16(3):383–391. [PubMed]
  • Brenner H, Born J, Novak P, Wanek V. Smoking behavior and attitude toward smoking regulations and passive smoking in the workplace. A study among 974 employees in the German metal industry. Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):138–143. [PubMed]
  • Poland BD, Stockton L, Ashley MJ, Pederson L, Cohen J, Ferrence R, Bull S. Interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places: a qualitative study. Can J Public Health. 1999 Sep-Oct;90(5):330–333. [PubMed]
  • Cardador MT, Hazan AR, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry smokers' rights publications: a content analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1212–1217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Poland BD. The 'considerate' smoker in public space: the micro-politics and political economy of 'doing the right thing'. Health Place. 2000 Mar;6(1):1–14. [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...