• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
Tob Control. Mar 2002; 11(1): 26–34.
PMCID: PMC1747656

Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA)

Abstract

Objective: To develop and implement a system for rating state clean indoor air laws.

Design: The public health interest of state clean indoor air laws is to limit non-smoker exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Current estimates of health risks and methods available for controlling ETS provided a framework for devising a ratings scale. An advisory committee applied this scale to each of seven site specific smoking restrictions and two enforcement related items. For each item, a target score of +4 was identified. The nine items were then combined to produce a summary score for each state. A state that achieved the target across all nine items would receive a summary score of 36 points and be eligible to receive an additional 6 points for exceeding the target on six of the nine items, resulting in a maximum summary score of 42 points. Individual scores were also adjusted to reflect state level preemption measures. Each state's law was evaluated annually from 1993 through 1999.

Setting: USA.

Main outcome measure: A summary score measuring the extensiveness of the state's clean indoor air law.

Results: State laws restricting smoking in the seven individual locations of interest were relatively weak. The overall mean score across the location restrictions ranged from 0.72 in 1993 to 0.98 in 1999. Mean scores were higher for the enforcement items than for the location restrictions. Summary scores ranged from 0 to 20 in 1993 and 0 to 31 in 1994 through 1999. Average summary scores ranged from 8.71 in 1993 to 10.98 in 1999. By the end of 1999, scores increased for 22 states; however, between 1995 and 1997 there were no changes in the summary scores. Three states scored zero points across all years. From 1993 through 1999, there was a 41% increase in the number of states that had in place state level preemption measures.

Conclusion: The number of newly enacted state clean indoor air laws has remained relatively stagnant since 1995. With a few exceptions, as of the end of 1999, progress in enacting state laws to meet specified public health targets for reducing exposure to ETS was relatively low. Thus, state laws in the USA provide, on average, only minimal protection in specified areas and, given the increase in preemption, are increasingly undermining those passed in localities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (131K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Brownson RC, Eriksen MP, Davis RM, Warner KE. Environmental tobacco smoke: health effects and policies to reduce exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:163–185. [PubMed]
  • Alciati MH, Frosh M, Green SB, Brownson RC, Fisher PH, Hobart R, Roman A, Sciandra RC, Shelton DM. State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system. Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):345–352. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ. Improving the measurement and use of tobacco control "inputs". Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):333–335. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Luke DA, Stamatakis KA, Brownson RC. State youth-access tobacco control policies and youth smoking behavior in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Oct;19(3):180–187. [PubMed]
  • Borland R, Pierce JP, Burns DM, Gilpin E, Johnson M, Bal D. Protection from environmental tobacco smoke in California. The case for a smoke-free workplace. JAMA. 1992 Aug 12;268(6):749–752. [PubMed]
  • Hammond SK, Sorensen G, Youngstrom R, Ockene JK. Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA. 1995 Sep 27;274(12):956–960. [PubMed]
  • Chapman S, Borland R, Scollo M, Brownson RC, Dominello A, Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1018–1023. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Farkas AJ, Gilpin EA, Distefan JM, Pierce JP. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):261–265. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Farrelly MC, Evans WN, Sfekas AE. The impact of workplace smoking bans: results from a national survey. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):272–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ, Husten CG, Carande-Kulis VG, Fielding JE, Alao MO, McKenna JW, Sharp DJ, Harris JR, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2 Suppl):16–66. [PubMed]
  • Ashley MJ, Ferrence R. Reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in homes: issues and strategies. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):61–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sweda EL, Jr, Gottlieb MA, Porfiri RC. Protecting children from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):1–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ, Kaufman NJ, Orleans CT, Barker DC, Ruel EE. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Biener L, Fitzgerald G. Smoky bars and restaurants: who avoids them and why? J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):74–78. [PubMed]
  • Biener L, Siegel M. Behavior intentions of the public after bans on smoking in restaurants and bars. Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):2042–2044. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Glantz SA, Smith LR. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1687–1693. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Siegel M. Involuntary smoking in the restaurant workplace. A review of employee exposure and health effects. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):490–493. [PubMed]
  • Jones K, Wakefield M, Turnbull DA. Attitudes and experiences of restaurateurs regarding smoking bans in Adelaide, South Australia. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):62–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hyland A, Cummings KM, Wilson MP. Compliance with the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):43–52. [PubMed]
  • Rigotti NA, Stoto MA, Schelling TC. Do businesses comply with a no-smoking law? Assessing the self-enforcement approach. Prev Med. 1994 Mar;23(2):223–229. [PubMed]
  • Repace JL, Lowrey AH. An enforceable indoor air quality standard for environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace. Risk Anal. 1993 Aug;13(4):463–475. [PubMed]
  • Vaughan WM, Hammond SK. Impact of "designated smoking area" policy on nicotine vapor and particle concentrations in a modern office building. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1990 Jul;40(7):1012–1017. [PubMed]
  • Williams DC, Whitaker JR, Jennings WG. Measurement of nicotine in building air as an indicator of tobacco smoke levels. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 May;60:405–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Becker DM, Conner HF, Waranch HR, Stillman F, Pennington L, Lees PS, Oski F. The impact of a total ban on smoking in the Johns Hopkins Children's Center. JAMA. 1989 Aug 11;262(6):799–802. [PubMed]
  • Stillman FA, Becker DM, Swank RT, Hantula D, Moses H, Glantz S, Waranch HR. Ending smoking at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. An evaluation of smoking prevalence and indoor air pollution. JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1565–1569. [PubMed]
  • Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: the current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Aug;43(8):680–686. [PubMed]
  • Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F, Fisher P. Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858–863. [PubMed]
  • Crawford VL. Cancer converts tobacco lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford goes on the record. Interview by Andrew A. Skolnick. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):199–202. [PubMed]
  • Longo DR, Brownson RC, Kruse RL. Smoking bans in US hospitals. Results of a national survey. JAMA. 1995 Aug 9;274(6):488–491. [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...